Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 454-462.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.02.023
• Prataculture·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian·Agricultural Eeconomy • Previous Articles Next Articles
HAN Xiqing(), ZHANG Xianhua(
), YUAN Hui, XIONG Hui, SA Chenghui
Received:
2024-08-19
Online:
2025-02-20
Published:
2025-04-17
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Xianhua
Supported by:
通讯作者:
张鲜花
作者简介:
韩禧卿(1996-),男,甘肃张掖人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草地资源与生态,(E-mail)1741977141@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
HAN Xiqing, ZHANG Xianhua, YUAN Hui, XIONG Hui, SA Chenghui. Analysis and evaluation of morphological characteristics and yield of 10 Phleum pratense (L. ) plants[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 454-462.
韩禧卿, 张鲜花, 袁惠, 熊辉, 撒成辉. 10份梯牧草植株形态特征与产量分析及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 454-462.
编号 Serial number | 区域 Region | 采集地/来源 Collection site/ source | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 地理位置 Geographical location | 备注 Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 天山北坡西段 | 尼勒克县木斯乡 | 1 621 | 83°18'19.90″E,43°41'49.03″N | 野生 |
T2 | 昭苏县军马场马料地 | 1 915 | 80°59'55.41″E,43°07'51.13″N | 野生 | |
T3 | 昭苏县军马场四马队 | 2 101 | 80°55'33.55″E,43°10'16.77″N | 野生 | |
T4 | 第四师七十七团 | 1 845 | 80°52'45.02″E,43°04'37.17″N | 野生 | |
T5 | 昭苏县野狼谷 | 2 177 | 81°00'06.40″E,43°10'30.26″N | 野生 | |
T6 | 昭苏县 | 2 179 | 81°09'29.00″E,43°15'33.60″N | 野生 | |
T7 | 尼勒克县唐布拉 | 1 931 | 83°50'12.04″E,43°43'08.30″N | 野生 | |
T8 | 天山北坡中段 | 乌鲁木齐县南山谢家沟 | 1 613 | 87°17'44.24″E,43°31'11.56″N | 野生 |
T9 | 乌鲁木齐县南山菊花台 | 2 080 | 87°10'47.69″E,43°28'21.47″N | 野生 | |
T10 | / | 岷县方正草业开发有限责任公司 | / | / | 岷山猫尾草/ 栽培品种 |
Tab.1 The source of Phleum pratense(L.) germ plasm resources
编号 Serial number | 区域 Region | 采集地/来源 Collection site/ source | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 地理位置 Geographical location | 备注 Note |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 天山北坡西段 | 尼勒克县木斯乡 | 1 621 | 83°18'19.90″E,43°41'49.03″N | 野生 |
T2 | 昭苏县军马场马料地 | 1 915 | 80°59'55.41″E,43°07'51.13″N | 野生 | |
T3 | 昭苏县军马场四马队 | 2 101 | 80°55'33.55″E,43°10'16.77″N | 野生 | |
T4 | 第四师七十七团 | 1 845 | 80°52'45.02″E,43°04'37.17″N | 野生 | |
T5 | 昭苏县野狼谷 | 2 177 | 81°00'06.40″E,43°10'30.26″N | 野生 | |
T6 | 昭苏县 | 2 179 | 81°09'29.00″E,43°15'33.60″N | 野生 | |
T7 | 尼勒克县唐布拉 | 1 931 | 83°50'12.04″E,43°43'08.30″N | 野生 | |
T8 | 天山北坡中段 | 乌鲁木齐县南山谢家沟 | 1 613 | 87°17'44.24″E,43°31'11.56″N | 野生 |
T9 | 乌鲁木齐县南山菊花台 | 2 080 | 87°10'47.69″E,43°28'21.47″N | 野生 | |
T10 | / | 岷县方正草业开发有限责任公司 | / | / | 岷山猫尾草/ 栽培品种 |
性状材料 Character material | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thick (mm) | 旗叶长 Flag leaf length (cm) | 旗叶宽 Flag leaf width (mm) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Blade width (mm) | 茎节数 Number of stem nodes (个) | 穗叶距 Distance of spicae and leaves (cm) | 穗长 Spike length (mm) | 穗宽 Spike width (mm) | 种子长 Seed length (mm) | 种子宽 Seed width (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 90.26±3.62ab | 1.61±0.10bc | 18.46±1.00abc | 6.99±0.42ab | 6.61±0.74b | 6.20±0.24ab | 4±0.1a | 11.62±1.75ab | 7.79±1.03ab | 6.13±0.14a | 1.79±0.03ab | 0.77±0.02ab |
T2 | 98.87±6.11ab | 1.56±0.16bc | 18.50±0.41abc | 5.96±0.35b | 6.57±0.46b | 5.35±0.43b | 4±0.23a | 13.09±1.27ab | 8.38±0.85ab | 6.09±0.25a | 1.81±0.01a | 0.74±0.01ab |
T3 | 101.34±9.85a | 1.79±0.09ab | 18.26±0.67abc | 6.63±0.56ab | 7.10±0.24b | 6.34±0.15ab | 4±0.03a | 15.21±1.94ab | 8.44±0.37ab | 5.64±0.49a | 1.69±0..04ab | 0.77±0.03ab |
T4 | 93.95±3.96ab | 1.86±0.03ab | 19.82±0.35ab | 6.46±0.64ab | 6.83±0.60b | 6.05±0.96b | 4±0.22a | 9.98±0.62bc | 8.32±0.33ab | 5.87±0.41a | 1.65±0.03ab | 0.76±0.00ab |
T5 | 97.61±4.90ab | 1.61±0.01bc | 18.07±0.46abc | 7.63±0.30a | 7.06±0.09b | 5.98±0.34b | 4±0.03a | 12.4±2.31ab | 7.22±1.04ab | 5.69±0.76a | 1.64±0.03ab | 0.76±0.01ab |
T6 | 86.85±2.31ab | 1.59±0.07bc | 19.22±0.75abc | 7.28±0.1ab | 8.18±0.74ab | 6.85±0.14ab | 4±0.2a | 16.47±0.75a | 8.44±0.85ab | 5.92±0.32a | 1.76±0.06ab | 0.77±0.01ab |
T7 | 83.15±2.84b | 1.57±0.11bc | 17.46±1.87bc | 7.05±0.62ab | 6.86±0.80b | 5.27±0.78b | 4±0.25a | 11.35±1.44ab | 7.00±0.49b | 5.84±0.19a | 1.49±0.06c | 0.7±0.03b |
T8 | 90.59±5.45ab | 1.47±0.03c | 18.05±0.54abc | 6.56±0.54ab | 7.45±0.39b | 5.67±0.55b | 4±0.23a | 16.27±2.21a | 7.16±0.43ab | 6.00±0.34a | 1.84±0.04a | 0.76±0.02ab |
T9 | 92.49±4.04ab | 1.62±0.12bc | 16.58±0.80c | 6.38±0.59ab | 6.41±0.47b | 6.01±0.10b | 4±0.09a | 12.37±1.68ab | 8.56±0.39ab | 5.95±0.17a | 1.74±0.03ab | 0.76±0.04ab |
T10 | 99.82±0.95ab | 2.04±0.08a | 20.48±0.56a | 7.56±0.52ab | 9.35±0.45a | 7.66±0.19a | 4±0.12a | 6.15±0.87c | 9.44±0.68a | 6.50±0.32a | 1.84±0.07a | 0.79±0.02a |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation(%) | 9.82 | 12.65 | 8.86 | 12.78 | 16.12 | 15.79 | 7.73 | 30.15 | 15.45 | 10.03 | 6.94 | 5.32 |
Tab.2 Comparisons of variance of Phleum pratense ( L.) plant morphological characteristics
性状材料 Character material | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thick (mm) | 旗叶长 Flag leaf length (cm) | 旗叶宽 Flag leaf width (mm) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Blade width (mm) | 茎节数 Number of stem nodes (个) | 穗叶距 Distance of spicae and leaves (cm) | 穗长 Spike length (mm) | 穗宽 Spike width (mm) | 种子长 Seed length (mm) | 种子宽 Seed width (mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 90.26±3.62ab | 1.61±0.10bc | 18.46±1.00abc | 6.99±0.42ab | 6.61±0.74b | 6.20±0.24ab | 4±0.1a | 11.62±1.75ab | 7.79±1.03ab | 6.13±0.14a | 1.79±0.03ab | 0.77±0.02ab |
T2 | 98.87±6.11ab | 1.56±0.16bc | 18.50±0.41abc | 5.96±0.35b | 6.57±0.46b | 5.35±0.43b | 4±0.23a | 13.09±1.27ab | 8.38±0.85ab | 6.09±0.25a | 1.81±0.01a | 0.74±0.01ab |
T3 | 101.34±9.85a | 1.79±0.09ab | 18.26±0.67abc | 6.63±0.56ab | 7.10±0.24b | 6.34±0.15ab | 4±0.03a | 15.21±1.94ab | 8.44±0.37ab | 5.64±0.49a | 1.69±0..04ab | 0.77±0.03ab |
T4 | 93.95±3.96ab | 1.86±0.03ab | 19.82±0.35ab | 6.46±0.64ab | 6.83±0.60b | 6.05±0.96b | 4±0.22a | 9.98±0.62bc | 8.32±0.33ab | 5.87±0.41a | 1.65±0.03ab | 0.76±0.00ab |
T5 | 97.61±4.90ab | 1.61±0.01bc | 18.07±0.46abc | 7.63±0.30a | 7.06±0.09b | 5.98±0.34b | 4±0.03a | 12.4±2.31ab | 7.22±1.04ab | 5.69±0.76a | 1.64±0.03ab | 0.76±0.01ab |
T6 | 86.85±2.31ab | 1.59±0.07bc | 19.22±0.75abc | 7.28±0.1ab | 8.18±0.74ab | 6.85±0.14ab | 4±0.2a | 16.47±0.75a | 8.44±0.85ab | 5.92±0.32a | 1.76±0.06ab | 0.77±0.01ab |
T7 | 83.15±2.84b | 1.57±0.11bc | 17.46±1.87bc | 7.05±0.62ab | 6.86±0.80b | 5.27±0.78b | 4±0.25a | 11.35±1.44ab | 7.00±0.49b | 5.84±0.19a | 1.49±0.06c | 0.7±0.03b |
T8 | 90.59±5.45ab | 1.47±0.03c | 18.05±0.54abc | 6.56±0.54ab | 7.45±0.39b | 5.67±0.55b | 4±0.23a | 16.27±2.21a | 7.16±0.43ab | 6.00±0.34a | 1.84±0.04a | 0.76±0.02ab |
T9 | 92.49±4.04ab | 1.62±0.12bc | 16.58±0.80c | 6.38±0.59ab | 6.41±0.47b | 6.01±0.10b | 4±0.09a | 12.37±1.68ab | 8.56±0.39ab | 5.95±0.17a | 1.74±0.03ab | 0.76±0.04ab |
T10 | 99.82±0.95ab | 2.04±0.08a | 20.48±0.56a | 7.56±0.52ab | 9.35±0.45a | 7.66±0.19a | 4±0.12a | 6.15±0.87c | 9.44±0.68a | 6.50±0.32a | 1.84±0.07a | 0.79±0.02a |
变异系数 Coefficient of variation(%) | 9.82 | 12.65 | 8.86 | 12.78 | 16.12 | 15.79 | 7.73 | 30.15 | 15.45 | 10.03 | 6.94 | 5.32 |
性状 Characters | 株高 Plant height | 茎粗 Stem thick | 旗叶长 Flag leaf length | 旗叶宽 Flag leaf width | 叶长 Leaf length | 叶宽 Blade width | 茎节数 Number of stem nodes | 穗叶距 Distance of spicae and leaves | 穗长 Spike length | 穗宽 Spike width | 种子长 Seed length | 种子宽 Seed width |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
牧草产量 Hay yield | 0.142 | 0.29 | 0.362* | -0.081 | 0.18 | 0.001 | -0.131 | -0.534** | -0.071 | -0.005 | 0.245 | 0.109 |
种子产量 Seed yield | 0.405* | 0.621** | 0.508** | 0.159 | 0.326 | 0.463** | 0.164 | -0.559** | 0.476** | 0.198 | 0.298 | 0.27 |
千粒重 Weight of thousand seeds | -0.146 | 0.008 | 0.243 | 0.077 | 0.224 | 0.033 | 0.109 | 0.146 | 0.018 | 0.046 | 0.209 | 0.126 |
Tab.3 Correlation analysis between morphological characteristics and yield of Phleum pratense ( L.) plants collected from different regions
性状 Characters | 株高 Plant height | 茎粗 Stem thick | 旗叶长 Flag leaf length | 旗叶宽 Flag leaf width | 叶长 Leaf length | 叶宽 Blade width | 茎节数 Number of stem nodes | 穗叶距 Distance of spicae and leaves | 穗长 Spike length | 穗宽 Spike width | 种子长 Seed length | 种子宽 Seed width |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
牧草产量 Hay yield | 0.142 | 0.29 | 0.362* | -0.081 | 0.18 | 0.001 | -0.131 | -0.534** | -0.071 | -0.005 | 0.245 | 0.109 |
种子产量 Seed yield | 0.405* | 0.621** | 0.508** | 0.159 | 0.326 | 0.463** | 0.164 | -0.559** | 0.476** | 0.198 | 0.298 | 0.27 |
千粒重 Weight of thousand seeds | -0.146 | 0.008 | 0.243 | 0.077 | 0.224 | 0.033 | 0.109 | 0.146 | 0.018 | 0.046 | 0.209 | 0.126 |
性状 Characters | 主成分Principal component | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
株高Plant height | 0.584 | -0.196 | -0.051 | 0.485 | 0.065 | 0.336 |
茎粗Stem thick | 0.74 | -0.328 | -0.031 | 0.132 | -0.227 | -0.367 |
旗叶长Flag leaf length | 0.791 | -0.031 | 0.314 | -0.171 | -0.028 | 0.176 |
旗叶宽Flag leaf width | 0.26 | 0.596 | -0.354 | -0.438 | -0.143 | -0.163 |
叶长Leaf length | 0.575 | 0.018 | 0.232 | -0.215 | -0.503 | 0.308 |
叶宽Blade width | 0.709 | 0.452 | -0.338 | -0.043 | -0.009 | -0.009 |
茎节数Number of stem nodes | 0.234 | 0.484 | -0.42 | -0.02 | 0.264 | 0.016 |
穗叶距Distance of spicae and leaves | -0.504 | 0.507 | 0.379 | 0.418 | 0.02 | -0.093 |
穗长Spike length | 0.528 | -0.055 | -0.097 | 0.676 | -0.189 | -0.263 |
穗宽Spike width | 0.464 | 0.265 | -0.203 | 0.18 | 0.212 | 0.529 |
种子长Seed length | 0.519 | 0.222 | 0.524 | 0.12 | 0.485 | 0.008 |
种子宽Seed width | 0.508 | 0.337 | 0.396 | -0.144 | 0.232 | -0.435 |
鲜草产量Fresh grass yield | 0.371 | -0.568 | 0.141 | -0.461 | 0.336 | 0.046 |
种子产量Seed yield | 0.78 | -0.222 | -0.178 | -0.013 | -0.022 | -0.208 |
千粒重Weight of thousand seeds | 0.104 | 0.409 | 0.489 | -0.094 | -0.411 | 0.136 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 4.503 | 1.974 | 1.488 | 1.443 | 1.052 | 1.011 |
贡献率Contribution rate(%) | 30.018 | 13.159 | 9.923 | 9.621 | 7.012 | 6.738 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate(%) | 30.018 | 43.177 | 53.1 | 62.72 | 69.733 | 76.47 |
Tab.4 Comparison of plant morphology and yield principal components of Phleum pratense ( L.) from different regions
性状 Characters | 主成分Principal component | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
株高Plant height | 0.584 | -0.196 | -0.051 | 0.485 | 0.065 | 0.336 |
茎粗Stem thick | 0.74 | -0.328 | -0.031 | 0.132 | -0.227 | -0.367 |
旗叶长Flag leaf length | 0.791 | -0.031 | 0.314 | -0.171 | -0.028 | 0.176 |
旗叶宽Flag leaf width | 0.26 | 0.596 | -0.354 | -0.438 | -0.143 | -0.163 |
叶长Leaf length | 0.575 | 0.018 | 0.232 | -0.215 | -0.503 | 0.308 |
叶宽Blade width | 0.709 | 0.452 | -0.338 | -0.043 | -0.009 | -0.009 |
茎节数Number of stem nodes | 0.234 | 0.484 | -0.42 | -0.02 | 0.264 | 0.016 |
穗叶距Distance of spicae and leaves | -0.504 | 0.507 | 0.379 | 0.418 | 0.02 | -0.093 |
穗长Spike length | 0.528 | -0.055 | -0.097 | 0.676 | -0.189 | -0.263 |
穗宽Spike width | 0.464 | 0.265 | -0.203 | 0.18 | 0.212 | 0.529 |
种子长Seed length | 0.519 | 0.222 | 0.524 | 0.12 | 0.485 | 0.008 |
种子宽Seed width | 0.508 | 0.337 | 0.396 | -0.144 | 0.232 | -0.435 |
鲜草产量Fresh grass yield | 0.371 | -0.568 | 0.141 | -0.461 | 0.336 | 0.046 |
种子产量Seed yield | 0.78 | -0.222 | -0.178 | -0.013 | -0.022 | -0.208 |
千粒重Weight of thousand seeds | 0.104 | 0.409 | 0.489 | -0.094 | -0.411 | 0.136 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 4.503 | 1.974 | 1.488 | 1.443 | 1.052 | 1.011 |
贡献率Contribution rate(%) | 30.018 | 13.159 | 9.923 | 9.621 | 7.012 | 6.738 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate(%) | 30.018 | 43.177 | 53.1 | 62.72 | 69.733 | 76.47 |
材料 Materials | 关联度 Correlation | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|
T1 | 0.897 | 9 |
T2 | 0.947 | 4 |
T3 | 0.901 | 7 |
T4 | 0.962 | 3 |
T5 | 0.906 | 5 |
T6 | 0.906 | 6 |
T7 | 0.899 | 8 |
T8 | 0.895 | 10 |
T9 | 0.997 | 1 |
T10 | 0.992 | 2 |
Tab.5 Comprehensive evaluation of morphological characteristics and yield of Phleum pratense ( L.) collected from different regions
材料 Materials | 关联度 Correlation | 排名 Ranking |
---|---|---|
T1 | 0.897 | 9 |
T2 | 0.947 | 4 |
T3 | 0.901 | 7 |
T4 | 0.962 | 3 |
T5 | 0.906 | 5 |
T6 | 0.906 | 6 |
T7 | 0.899 | 8 |
T8 | 0.895 | 10 |
T9 | 0.997 | 1 |
T10 | 0.992 | 2 |
[1] | 高明, 陆相龙, 毛宏祥, 等. 梯牧草和燕麦草的营养价值及其奶牛瘤胃降解特性[J]. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 48(3): 335-341. |
GAO Ming, LU Xianglong, MAO Hongxiang, et al. Nutritional value of timothy grass and oat grass and their rumen degradation properties in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2022, 48(3): 335-341. | |
[2] | Escribano S, Robins J G. Phenotypic performance of timothy accessions under irrigated and nonirrigated conditions[J]. Crop Science, 2014, 54(3): 1079-1086. |
[3] | 曹致中. 我国猫尾草引种栽培与猫尾草产业之梗概[J]. 中国草地, 2003, 25(6): 72-74. |
CAO Zhizhong. The cultivation and production of Phleum pratense in China[J]. Grassland of China, 2003, 25(6): 72-74. | |
[4] | 何盘星. 塔尔巴哈台山不同海拔野生鸭茅群落物种多样性及种群分布研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2018. |
HE Panxing. Study on Species Diversity and Population Distribution of Dactylis glomerata at Different Elevations in Talbahatai Mountain[D] Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[5] | 师尚礼, 曹文侠, 陈耀, 等. 猫尾草产业发展现状与前景分析[J]. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(5): 1-7. |
SHI Shangli, CAO Wenxia, CHEN Yao, et al. Analysis of current situation and prospect of characteristic forage industry of timothy in China[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2020, 40(5): 1-7. | |
[6] | 杨鹏年, 安学忠, 马文馨, 等. 猫尾草新品系在甘肃省中部地区的生产性能和营养价值研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(9): 44-51. |
YANG Pengnian, AN Xuezhong, MA Wenxin, et al. The study on the production performance and nutritional value of a new line of Phleum pretense in central Gansu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(9): 44-51. | |
[7] | 王凤宇, 梁国玲, 刘文辉. 590份燕麦种质资源营养器官表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 1-16. |
WANG Fengyu, LING Guoling, LIU Wenhui. Phenotypic Diversity Analysis of Nutritional Organs in 590 Oats Germplasm[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland,1-16. | |
[8] | 景芳, 刘彦明, 南铭, 等. 12个燕麦品种在黄土高原沟壑区生产性能及适应性[J]. 草业科学, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. |
JING Fang, LIU Yanming, NAN Ming, et al. Production performance and adaptability of 12 oat varieties in the Gully Region of Loess Plateau[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2024, 41(5): 1175-1188. | |
[9] | 哈雪, 张金青, 宋于笑, 等. 5份草地早熟禾种子产量性状相关指标综合评价与分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2023, 45(12): 61-71. |
HA Xue, ZHANG Jinqing, SONG Yuxiao, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of seed yield traits in five varieties of Kentucky bluegrass[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2023, 45(12): 61-71. | |
[10] |
郭文章, 井长青, 王公鑫, 等. 天山北坡荒漠草原土壤呼吸和生态系统呼吸对降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
DOI |
GUO Wenzhang, JING Changqing, WANG Gongxin, et al. Responses of soil respiration and ecosystem respiration to precipitation in desert steppe on the northern slope of Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
DOI |
|
[11] | 孙玉兰, 陈爱萍, 李瑞强, 等. 20份红豆草种质资源农艺与品质性状综合评价[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2022, 45 (3): 182-189. |
SUN Yulan, CHEN Aiping, LI Ruiqiang, et al. Comperhensive Evaluation of Ageonomic and Quality Traits of 20 Onobrychis viciifolia Germplasm Resources[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2022, 45(3): 182-189. | |
[12] | 张锦豪, 王树彦, 杨恩泽, 等. 藜麦种质资源表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(12): 37-46. |
ZHANG Jinhao, WANG Shuyan, YANG Enze, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits in Chenopodium quinoa Willd. germplasm resources[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(12): 37-46. | |
[13] | 程离, 夏建梅, 胡冬南, 等. 河南新县野生油茶群体表型变异特征研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2020, 54(1): 52-58. |
CHENG Li, XIA Jianmei, HU Dongnan, et al. Phenotypic variation of natural Camellia oleifera populations in Xinxian County of Henan Province[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2020, 54(1): 52-58. | |
[14] | 吕伟, 韩俊梅, 任果香, 等. 山西芝麻种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(5): 57-63. |
LYU Wei, HAN Junmei, REN Guoxiang, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of sesame germplasm resources in Shanxi[J]. Crops, 2019,(5): 57-63. | |
[15] | 孙铭, 符开欣, 范彦, 等. 15份多花黑麦草优良引进种质的表型变异分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4): 655-662. |
SUN Ming, FU Kaixin, FAN Yan, et al. Analysis of phenotypic variations in 15 introduced elite germplasm of Lolium multiflorum lam[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(4): 655-662. | |
[16] | 吕亮雨, 刘青青, 蔡宗程, 等. 达日县7个燕麦品种生产性能对比研究[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2023, 53(4): 21-26, 32. |
LYU Liangyu, LIU Qingqing, CAI Zongcheng, et al. Comparative study on production performance of 7 oat varieties in Dari County[J]. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2023, 53(4): 21-26, 32. | |
[17] | 虎凌云, 汪茜, 赵冠军, 等. 岷县猫尾草新品种引种试验[J]. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2019, 49(3): 71-73. |
HU Lingyun, WANG Qian|Xi, ZHAO Guanjun, et al. Introduction test of new varieties of Phleum pratense ( L. ) in Minxian County[J]. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2019, 49(3): 71-73. | |
[18] | 张瑞珍, 马涛, 余东, 等. “川西” 猫尾草新品种驯化选育研究[J]. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 47(1): 1-10. |
ZHANG Ruizhen, MA Tao, YU Dong, et al. Study on domestication and breeding of new variety of Chuanxi timothy grass[J]. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 47(1): 1-10. | |
[19] |
Xiong Y, Lei X, Bai S Q, et al. Genomic survey sequencing, development and characterization of single- and multi-locus genomic SSR markers of Elymus sibiricus L[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2021, 21(1): 3.
DOI PMID |
[20] | 周镇磊, 刘建明, 曹东, 等. 不同燕麦品种草产量、农艺性状和饲草品质的比较[J/OL]. 作物杂志, 2023 (2023-10-10). |
ZHOU Zhenlei, LIU Jianming, CAO Dong, et al. Comparison of Grass Yield, Agronomic Traits and Forage Quality of Different Oat Varieties[J/OL]. Crop, 2023 (2023-10-10). | |
[21] | 杜文华, 田新会, 曹致中. 猫尾草不同品种的种子产量和适应性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2004, 13(3): 52-56. |
DU Wenhua, TIAN Xinhui, CAO Zhizhong. Phleum pratense variety seed yield and adaptability[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(3): 52-56. | |
[22] | 张鸭关, 薛世明, 匡崇义, 等. 云南北亚热带冬闲田引种优良牧草的灰色关联度分析与综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2007, 16(3): 69-73. |
ZHANG Yaguan, XUE Shiming, KUANG Chongyi, et al. Relation grade analysis of grey theory and comprehensive evaluation of introduced forage of winter-free farmland in the north of Yunnan subtropics[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2007, 16(3): 69-73. |
[1] | LIU Yue, LIAN Shihao, LI Jiahao, WANG Hongyi, TIAN Wenqiang, NIE Lingfan, SUN Ganggang, JIA Yonghong, SHI Shubing, YU Yuehua, ZHANG Jinshan. Effects of sowing dates and planting density on yield formation and quality of peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 278-285. |
[2] | LU Mingkun, LI Junhong, Nilupaier Yusufujiang, PAN Xipeng, LIU Xiaocheng, ZHANG Zhenggui, PAN Zhanlei, ZHAI Menghua, ZHANG Yaopeng, ZHAO Wenqi, WANG Lihong, WANG Zhanbiao. Effect of silic on fertiliser application on the growth and development of cotton and its yield and quality [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 286-293. |
[3] | WANG Yiding, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Lingjian, ZHANG Hui, GUO Xiaomeng, CHEN Guoyue. Effects of drip irrigation on the growth and development, yield formation, and water use efficiency of cotton in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 294-301. |
[4] | WANG Xiaoyan, BAI Yungang, CHAI Zhongping, LU Zhenlin, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, Amannisa . Effect of "dry sowing and wet emergence" on cotton growth and yield under the control of winter drip irrigation in off-cropping period [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 302-313. |
[5] | LI Tianle, BAI Xinlu, AN Shijie, ZHENG Qiangqing, TANG Zhihui, ZHI Jinhu. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on the growth, fruit quality and yield of Korla Fragrant Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 335-342. |
[6] | SUN Na, MA Lin, ZOU Hui, ZHANG Zhihui, ZHANG Shengjun, HUANG Qiannan, YANG Hui, Dengsilamu Tuerxunbai, LI Zhibin, CAO Junmei, LEI Junjie. Analysis of combined application of NPK fertilizers on yield and quality of winter wheat and the fertilizer effect [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 1-12. |
[7] | DU Yalong, FU Qiuping, AI Pengrui, MA Yingjie, QI Tong, PAN Yang. Comprehensive evaluation of irrigation treatment based on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated Gossypium barbadense [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 161-173. |
[8] | XIE Xiurong, ZHANG Yongqiang, HAI Feng, LEI Junjie, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, WANG Jichuan. Effects of uniform sowing and densification on population structure and yield of late sowing winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 21-28. |
[9] | HU Mengting, LIU Shengyao, JIA Songnan, FAN Fengcui, DU Fenghuan, LI Jingsong, QIN Yong. Effects of different planting row spacings on yield and water use efficiency of spinach [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 217-224. |
[10] | ZHANG Yanting, ZHANG Yongqiang, LEI Junjie, CHEN Hui, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, XU Wenxiu. Effects of different phosphorus application modes on photosynthetic physiological characteristics and yield of Dry-Seeded and Wet-Emerged winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 29-36. |
[11] | HAI Feng, ZHANG Yongqiang, XIE Xiurong, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, WANG Jichuan, LEI Junjie. Effects of different drip irrigation rates on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of drip irrigated winter wheat under limited irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 45-52. |
[12] | LI Jie, XU Qijiang, ZHANG Yongqiang, XU Wenxiu, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie. Effects of different urea and application methods on photosynthetic characteristics, yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 53-59. |
[13] | MA Lin, HUANG Qiannan, YANG Hui, Dengsilamu Tuerxunbai, ZOU Hui, SUN Na, LEI Junjie. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizers with humic acid strategies on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 60-67. |
[14] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHANG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effect of microbial agents combined with nitrogen fertilizer on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 68-74. |
[15] | LI Na, LYU Caixia, Xin Huinan, LI Yongfu, LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on the characteristics and root zone soil nutrients of drip irrigation wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 87-94. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 6
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 44
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||