Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (1): 1-12.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.01.001
• Special volume for green,yield increasing,quality improving and efficiency improving technologies for major grain crops in Xinjing • Previous Articles Next Articles
SUN Na1(), MA Lin1, ZOU Hui1, ZHANG Zhihui1, ZHANG Shengjun1, HUANG Qiannan1, YANG Hui1, Dengsilamu Tuerxunbai1, LI Zhibin2, CAO Junmei3(
), LEI Junjie3(
)
Received:
2024-08-10
Online:
2025-01-20
Published:
2025-03-11
Correspondence author:
CAO Junmei, LEI Junjie
Supported by:
孙娜1(), 马林1, 邹辉1, 张志辉1, 张胜军1, 黄倩楠1, 杨蕙1, 登斯拉木·吐尔逊拜1, 李志彬2, 曹俊梅3(
), 雷钧杰3(
)
通讯作者:
曹俊梅,雷钧杰
作者简介:
孙娜(1982-),女,吉林人,高级农艺师,研究方向为小麦遗传育种,(E-mail)Sna18509993321@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
SUN Na, MA Lin, ZOU Hui, ZHANG Zhihui, ZHANG Shengjun, HUANG Qiannan, YANG Hui, Dengsilamu Tuerxunbai, LI Zhibin, CAO Junmei, LEI Junjie. Analysis of combined application of NPK fertilizers on yield and quality of winter wheat and the fertilizer effect[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 1-12.
孙娜, 马林, 邹辉, 张志辉, 张胜军, 黄倩楠, 杨蕙, 登斯拉木·吐尔逊拜, 李志彬, 曹俊梅, 雷钧杰. 氮磷钾配施对冬小麦产量和品质的影响及其肥效分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 1-12.
处理 Treatments | 养分 Nutrition (kg/hm2) | 施肥量 Fertilizer amounts (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 尿素 Urea | 重过磷酸钙 Heavy calcium superphosphate | 颗粒硫酸钾 Granular potassium sulfate | |
N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N0P2K2 | 0 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 0 | 240 | 114.75 |
N1P2K2 | 82.80 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 180 | 240 | 114.75 |
N2P0K2 | 165.60 | 0 | 45.90 | 360 | 0 | 114.75 |
N2P1K2 | 165.60 | 55.20 | 45.90 | 360 | 120 | 114.75 |
N2P2K2 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 360 | 240 | 114.75 |
N2P3K2 | 165.60 | 165.60 | 45.90 | 360 | 360 | 114.75 |
N2P2K0 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 0 | 360 | 240 | 0 |
N2P2K1 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 22.95 | 360 | 240 | 57.45 |
N2P2K3 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 68.85 | 360 | 240 | 172.20 |
N3P2K2 | 248.40 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 540 | 240 | 114.75 |
N1P1K2 | 82.80 | 55.20 | 45.90 | 180 | 120 | 114.75 |
N1P2K1 | 82.80 | 110.40 | 22.95 | 180 | 240 | 57.45 |
N2P1K1 | 165.60 | 55.20 | 22.95 | 360 | 120 | 57.45 |
Tab.2 "3414" experiment design and fertilizer amounts
处理 Treatments | 养分 Nutrition (kg/hm2) | 施肥量 Fertilizer amounts (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O | 尿素 Urea | 重过磷酸钙 Heavy calcium superphosphate | 颗粒硫酸钾 Granular potassium sulfate | |
N0P0K0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N0P2K2 | 0 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 0 | 240 | 114.75 |
N1P2K2 | 82.80 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 180 | 240 | 114.75 |
N2P0K2 | 165.60 | 0 | 45.90 | 360 | 0 | 114.75 |
N2P1K2 | 165.60 | 55.20 | 45.90 | 360 | 120 | 114.75 |
N2P2K2 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 360 | 240 | 114.75 |
N2P3K2 | 165.60 | 165.60 | 45.90 | 360 | 360 | 114.75 |
N2P2K0 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 0 | 360 | 240 | 0 |
N2P2K1 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 22.95 | 360 | 240 | 57.45 |
N2P2K3 | 165.60 | 110.40 | 68.85 | 360 | 240 | 172.20 |
N3P2K2 | 248.40 | 110.40 | 45.90 | 540 | 240 | 114.75 |
N1P1K2 | 82.80 | 55.20 | 45.90 | 180 | 120 | 114.75 |
N1P2K1 | 82.80 | 110.40 | 22.95 | 180 | 240 | 57.45 |
N2P1K1 | 165.60 | 55.20 | 22.95 | 360 | 120 | 57.45 |
处理 Treat- ments | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 氮肥投入 N input (元/hm2) | 磷肥投入 P input (元/hm2) | 钾肥投入 K input (元/hm2) | 肥料总投入 Total fertilizer input (元/hm2) | 产值 Output value (元/hm2) | 经济效益 Economic benefit (元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0P0K0 | 5 135.35±52.20h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 427.55h | 12 427.55±126.32j |
N0P2K2 | 6 557.07±5.82g | 0 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 754.30 | 15 868.10g | 15 113.80±14.08i |
N1P2K2 | 7 507.13±70.91d | 323.75 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 1 078.05 | 18 167.26d | 17 089.21±171.60fg |
N2P0K2 | 7 215.32±13.20f | 647.50 | 0 | 298.35 | 945.85 | 17 461.07f | 16 515.22±31.94h |
N2P1K2 | 7 629.05±26.89c | 647.50 | 227.98 | 298.35 | 1 173.83 | 18 462.30c | 17 288.47±65.08ef |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 647.50 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 1 401.80 | 19 447.20a | 18 045.40±90.10a |
N2P3K2 | 7 984.50±5.25a | 647.50 | 683.93 | 298.35 | 1 629.78 | 19 322.49a | 17 692.71±12.70bc |
N2P2K0 | 7 532.12±84.22d | 647.50 | 455.95 | 0 | 1 103.45 | 18 227.72d | 17 124.27±203.82 fg |
N2P2K1 | 7 731.57±41.50b | 647.50 | 455.95 | 149.18 | 1 252.63 | 18 710.39b | 17 457.76±100.44de |
N2P2K3 | 8 010.02±26.23a | 647.50 | 455.95 | 447.53 | 1 550.98 | 19 384.24a | 17 833.26±63.48b |
N3P2K2 | 7 976.48±42.54a | 971.24 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 1 725.54 | 19 303.09a | 17 577.55±102.95cd |
N1P1K2 | 7 378.40±62.86e | 323.75 | 227.98 | 298.35 | 850.08 | 17 855.73e | 17 005.65±152.12g |
N1P2K1 | 7 588.37±77.31cd | 323.75 | 455.95 | 149.18 | 928.88 | 18 363.85cd | 17 434.97±187.10de |
N2P1K1 | 7 766.68±24.95b | 647.50 | 227.98 | 149.18 | 1 024.66 | 18 795.37b | 17 770.71±60.37bc |
Tab.2 Changes of different fertilizer treatments on winter wheat yield and economic efficiency
处理 Treat- ments | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 氮肥投入 N input (元/hm2) | 磷肥投入 P input (元/hm2) | 钾肥投入 K input (元/hm2) | 肥料总投入 Total fertilizer input (元/hm2) | 产值 Output value (元/hm2) | 经济效益 Economic benefit (元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0P0K0 | 5 135.35±52.20h | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 427.55h | 12 427.55±126.32j |
N0P2K2 | 6 557.07±5.82g | 0 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 754.30 | 15 868.10g | 15 113.80±14.08i |
N1P2K2 | 7 507.13±70.91d | 323.75 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 1 078.05 | 18 167.26d | 17 089.21±171.60fg |
N2P0K2 | 7 215.32±13.20f | 647.50 | 0 | 298.35 | 945.85 | 17 461.07f | 16 515.22±31.94h |
N2P1K2 | 7 629.05±26.89c | 647.50 | 227.98 | 298.35 | 1 173.83 | 18 462.30c | 17 288.47±65.08ef |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 647.50 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 1 401.80 | 19 447.20a | 18 045.40±90.10a |
N2P3K2 | 7 984.50±5.25a | 647.50 | 683.93 | 298.35 | 1 629.78 | 19 322.49a | 17 692.71±12.70bc |
N2P2K0 | 7 532.12±84.22d | 647.50 | 455.95 | 0 | 1 103.45 | 18 227.72d | 17 124.27±203.82 fg |
N2P2K1 | 7 731.57±41.50b | 647.50 | 455.95 | 149.18 | 1 252.63 | 18 710.39b | 17 457.76±100.44de |
N2P2K3 | 8 010.02±26.23a | 647.50 | 455.95 | 447.53 | 1 550.98 | 19 384.24a | 17 833.26±63.48b |
N3P2K2 | 7 976.48±42.54a | 971.24 | 455.95 | 298.35 | 1 725.54 | 19 303.09a | 17 577.55±102.95cd |
N1P1K2 | 7 378.40±62.86e | 323.75 | 227.98 | 298.35 | 850.08 | 17 855.73e | 17 005.65±152.12g |
N1P2K1 | 7 588.37±77.31cd | 323.75 | 455.95 | 149.18 | 928.88 | 18 363.85cd | 17 434.97±187.10de |
N2P1K1 | 7 766.68±24.95b | 647.50 | 227.98 | 149.18 | 1 024.66 | 18 795.37b | 17 770.71±60.37bc |
肥料 类型 Fertilizer | 处理 Treatments | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 增产量 Increase (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Incr. Rate (%) | 毛收入增加 Incr. Profit (元/hm2) | 增加纯收入 Incr. net Profit (元/hm2) | 肥料贡献率 FCR(%) | 农学效率 AE (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N0P2K2 | 6 557.07±5.82c | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N1P2K2 | 7 507.13±70.91b | 950.06 | 14.49 | 2 299.16 | 1 975.41 | 13.06 | 11.47 | |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 1478.97 | 22.56 | 3 579.10 | 2 931.60 | 18.64 | 9.08 | |
N3P2K2 | 7 976.48±42.54a | 1 419.42 | 21.65 | 3 434.99 | 2 463.74 | 17.80 | 5.71 | |
平均 | 1 282.82 | 19.56 | 3 104.42 | 2 456.92 | 16.50 | 8.76 | ||
P2O5 | N2P0K2 | 7 215.32±13.20d | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N2P1K2 | 7 629.05±26.89c | 413.73 | 5.73 | 1 001.23 | 773.26 | 5.42 | 7.50 | |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 820.72 | 11.37 | 1 986.13 | 1 530.18 | 10.21 | 7.43 | |
N2P3K2 | 7 984.50±5.25b | 769.18 | 10.66 | 1 861.42 | 1 177.50 | 9.63 | 4.64 | |
平均 | 667.88 | 9.26 | 1 616.26 | 1 160.31 | 8.42 | 6.52 | ||
K2O | N2P2K0 | 7 532.12±84.22c | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N2P2K1 | 7 731.57±41.50b | 199.45 | 2.65 | 482.67 | 333.49 | 2.58 | 8.69 | |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 503.92 | 6.69 | 1 219.48 | 921.13 | 6.27 | 10.98 | |
N2P2K3 | 8 010.02±26.23a | 449.90 | 5.97 | 1 088.76 | 641.23 | 5.97 | 6.94 | |
平均 | 384.42 | 5.10 | 930.30 | 631.95 | 4.94 | 8.87 |
Tab.3 Fertilization effects of different N, P and K levels in winter wheat
肥料 类型 Fertilizer | 处理 Treatments | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 增产量 Increase (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Incr. Rate (%) | 毛收入增加 Incr. Profit (元/hm2) | 增加纯收入 Incr. net Profit (元/hm2) | 肥料贡献率 FCR(%) | 农学效率 AE (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | N0P2K2 | 6 557.07±5.82c | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N1P2K2 | 7 507.13±70.91b | 950.06 | 14.49 | 2 299.16 | 1 975.41 | 13.06 | 11.47 | |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 1478.97 | 22.56 | 3 579.10 | 2 931.60 | 18.64 | 9.08 | |
N3P2K2 | 7 976.48±42.54a | 1 419.42 | 21.65 | 3 434.99 | 2 463.74 | 17.80 | 5.71 | |
平均 | 1 282.82 | 19.56 | 3 104.42 | 2 456.92 | 16.50 | 8.76 | ||
P2O5 | N2P0K2 | 7 215.32±13.20d | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N2P1K2 | 7 629.05±26.89c | 413.73 | 5.73 | 1 001.23 | 773.26 | 5.42 | 7.50 | |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 820.72 | 11.37 | 1 986.13 | 1 530.18 | 10.21 | 7.43 | |
N2P3K2 | 7 984.50±5.25b | 769.18 | 10.66 | 1 861.42 | 1 177.50 | 9.63 | 4.64 | |
平均 | 667.88 | 9.26 | 1 616.26 | 1 160.31 | 8.42 | 6.52 | ||
K2O | N2P2K0 | 7 532.12±84.22c | - | - | - | - | - | - |
N2P2K1 | 7 731.57±41.50b | 199.45 | 2.65 | 482.67 | 333.49 | 2.58 | 8.69 | |
N2P2K2 | 8 036.03±37.23a | 503.92 | 6.69 | 1 219.48 | 921.13 | 6.27 | 10.98 | |
N2P2K3 | 8 010.02±26.23a | 449.90 | 5.97 | 1 088.76 | 641.23 | 5.97 | 6.94 | |
平均 | 384.42 | 5.10 | 930.30 | 631.95 | 4.94 | 8.87 |
处理 Treatments | 蛋白质含量 Rotein content (%) | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten (%) | 面团形成时间 Development time (min) | 稳定时间 Stabilization time (min) | 沉降值 Sedimentation value | 吸水率 Water absorption (%) | 稠度 Consistence | 弱化度 Degree of softening | 容重 Test weight (g/L) | 硬度 Hardness (%) | 粉质质量指数 Farinograph quality number | 淀粉(干基) Starch(dry basis) (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0P0K0 | 14.02±0.18c | 30.15±1.46d | 2.00±0.17b | 1.00±0.20a | 22.16±1.34cd | 65.47±0.42b | 481.00±7.00d | 169.33±9.45abc | 807.32±5.88a | 69.50±0.25a | 26.33±1.53a | 71.31±0.74abc |
N0P2K2 | 14.03±0.63c | 30.96±1.14cd | 2.30±0.17ab | 1.20±0.17a | 21.53±2.03d | 66.00±0.61ab | 502.67±22.37abc | 154.33±10.97c | 814.16±7.39a | 69.20±1.03a | 29.33±3.06a | 71.96±0.52a |
N1P2K2 | 14.75±0.26b | 31.82±0.61abc | 2.53±0.15ab | 1.10±0.10a | 23.64±0.99abcd | 66.13±0.51ab | 502.67±11.06abc | 177.33±11.50abc | 811.84±7.64a | 69.89±0.57a | 29.33±2.08a | 71.15±0.07abc |
N2P0K2 | 15.33±0.42ab | 30.31±0.98a | 2.43±0.45ab | 1.20±0.20a | 24.88±0.66a | 65.97±0.25ab | 491.00±18.03bcd | 186.00±17.09a | 809.39±6.50a | 70.31±0.39a | 28.67±3.06a | 70.64±0.64c |
N2P1K2 | 15.15±0.50ab | 32.79±1.08a | 2.57±0.67ab | 1.17±0.35a | 24.08±1.48abc | 66.17±0.32ab | 503.00±5.57abc | 180.33±16.65ab | 811.47±1.50a | 69.70±0.82a | 30.33±6.35a | 70.93±0.30bc |
N2P2K2 | 14.87±0.39b | 32.16±0.92abc | 2.40±0.46ab | 1.13±0.31a | 25.15±0.31a | 66.00±0.30ab | 506.00±6.56ab | 171.00±7.81abc | 810.30±3.69a | 70.03±0.77a | 29.33±5.51a | 71.03±0.50abc |
N2P3K2 | 15.10±0.19ab | 32.69±0.43ab | 2.30±0.34ab | 1.13±0.25a | 24.88±0.51abc | 66.53±0.23a | 520.00±11.36a | 192.33±6.66a | 811.77±7.82a | 69.91±0.45a | 26.33±4.04a | 71.22±0.22abc |
N2P2K0 | 15.19±0.44ab | 32.92±1.07a | 2.27±0.25ab | 1.23±0.25a | 24.89±0.94ab | 66.07±0.32ab | 505.67±9.07ab | 183.67±6.66a | 813.89±5.13a | 69.86±0.46a | 28.33±2.08a | 70.61±0.73c |
N2P2K1 | 14.81±0.41b | 32.20±0.54abc | 2.33±0.29ab | 1.37±0.35a | 24.54±1.32ab | 65.97±0.25ab | 501.00±11.27abcd | 173.67±24.79abc | 813.55±2.73a | 69.62±0.50a | 29.00±1.73a | 71.42±0.66abc |
N2P2K3 | 15.29±0.15ab | 33.07±0.43a | 2.27±0.51ab | 1.27±0.29a | 24.99±0.76ab | 66.40±0.70a | 507.00±13.23ab | 186.00±7.94a | 810.45±6.76a | 69.32±0.60a | 26.67±3.51a | 70.97±0.24abc |
N3P2K2 | 15.59±0.26a | 33.31±0.28a | 2.50±0.17ab | 1.27±0.32a | 25.41±1.05a | 66.37±0.42a | 505.00±3.00ab | 183.67±12.74a | 811.08±1.35a | 69.91±0.72a | 27.00±3.61a | 70.68±0.07c |
N1P1K2 | 14.81±0.16b | 32.10±0.22abc | 2.73±0.31a | 1.10±0.10a | 22.93±0.57bcd | 66.10±0.36ab | 490.67±7.64bcd | 167.67±8.96abc | 809.00±0.77a | 69.95±0.85a | 29.33±3.79a | 71.27±0.23abc |
N1P2K1 | 14.85±0.32b | 32.11±0.72abc | 2.37±0.21ab | 1.03±0.12a | 23.56±0.33abc | 66.00±0.61ab | 501.67±1.53abcd | 184.33±8.33a | 815.77±6.51a | 70.28±0.12a | 29.33±2.08a | 71.34±0.42abc |
N2P1K1 | 14.93±0.23ab | 31.19±0.69bcd | 2.33±0.12ab | 1.18±0.22a | 22.90±1.37bcd | 65.73±0.58ab | 483.00±6.25cd | 156.67±12.34bc | 810.71±5.67a | 70.11±0.19a | 30.67±2.31a | 71.76±1.00ab |
Tab.4 Changes of different fertilization treatments on wheat quality
处理 Treatments | 蛋白质含量 Rotein content (%) | 湿面筋含量 Wet gluten (%) | 面团形成时间 Development time (min) | 稳定时间 Stabilization time (min) | 沉降值 Sedimentation value | 吸水率 Water absorption (%) | 稠度 Consistence | 弱化度 Degree of softening | 容重 Test weight (g/L) | 硬度 Hardness (%) | 粉质质量指数 Farinograph quality number | 淀粉(干基) Starch(dry basis) (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0P0K0 | 14.02±0.18c | 30.15±1.46d | 2.00±0.17b | 1.00±0.20a | 22.16±1.34cd | 65.47±0.42b | 481.00±7.00d | 169.33±9.45abc | 807.32±5.88a | 69.50±0.25a | 26.33±1.53a | 71.31±0.74abc |
N0P2K2 | 14.03±0.63c | 30.96±1.14cd | 2.30±0.17ab | 1.20±0.17a | 21.53±2.03d | 66.00±0.61ab | 502.67±22.37abc | 154.33±10.97c | 814.16±7.39a | 69.20±1.03a | 29.33±3.06a | 71.96±0.52a |
N1P2K2 | 14.75±0.26b | 31.82±0.61abc | 2.53±0.15ab | 1.10±0.10a | 23.64±0.99abcd | 66.13±0.51ab | 502.67±11.06abc | 177.33±11.50abc | 811.84±7.64a | 69.89±0.57a | 29.33±2.08a | 71.15±0.07abc |
N2P0K2 | 15.33±0.42ab | 30.31±0.98a | 2.43±0.45ab | 1.20±0.20a | 24.88±0.66a | 65.97±0.25ab | 491.00±18.03bcd | 186.00±17.09a | 809.39±6.50a | 70.31±0.39a | 28.67±3.06a | 70.64±0.64c |
N2P1K2 | 15.15±0.50ab | 32.79±1.08a | 2.57±0.67ab | 1.17±0.35a | 24.08±1.48abc | 66.17±0.32ab | 503.00±5.57abc | 180.33±16.65ab | 811.47±1.50a | 69.70±0.82a | 30.33±6.35a | 70.93±0.30bc |
N2P2K2 | 14.87±0.39b | 32.16±0.92abc | 2.40±0.46ab | 1.13±0.31a | 25.15±0.31a | 66.00±0.30ab | 506.00±6.56ab | 171.00±7.81abc | 810.30±3.69a | 70.03±0.77a | 29.33±5.51a | 71.03±0.50abc |
N2P3K2 | 15.10±0.19ab | 32.69±0.43ab | 2.30±0.34ab | 1.13±0.25a | 24.88±0.51abc | 66.53±0.23a | 520.00±11.36a | 192.33±6.66a | 811.77±7.82a | 69.91±0.45a | 26.33±4.04a | 71.22±0.22abc |
N2P2K0 | 15.19±0.44ab | 32.92±1.07a | 2.27±0.25ab | 1.23±0.25a | 24.89±0.94ab | 66.07±0.32ab | 505.67±9.07ab | 183.67±6.66a | 813.89±5.13a | 69.86±0.46a | 28.33±2.08a | 70.61±0.73c |
N2P2K1 | 14.81±0.41b | 32.20±0.54abc | 2.33±0.29ab | 1.37±0.35a | 24.54±1.32ab | 65.97±0.25ab | 501.00±11.27abcd | 173.67±24.79abc | 813.55±2.73a | 69.62±0.50a | 29.00±1.73a | 71.42±0.66abc |
N2P2K3 | 15.29±0.15ab | 33.07±0.43a | 2.27±0.51ab | 1.27±0.29a | 24.99±0.76ab | 66.40±0.70a | 507.00±13.23ab | 186.00±7.94a | 810.45±6.76a | 69.32±0.60a | 26.67±3.51a | 70.97±0.24abc |
N3P2K2 | 15.59±0.26a | 33.31±0.28a | 2.50±0.17ab | 1.27±0.32a | 25.41±1.05a | 66.37±0.42a | 505.00±3.00ab | 183.67±12.74a | 811.08±1.35a | 69.91±0.72a | 27.00±3.61a | 70.68±0.07c |
N1P1K2 | 14.81±0.16b | 32.10±0.22abc | 2.73±0.31a | 1.10±0.10a | 22.93±0.57bcd | 66.10±0.36ab | 490.67±7.64bcd | 167.67±8.96abc | 809.00±0.77a | 69.95±0.85a | 29.33±3.79a | 71.27±0.23abc |
N1P2K1 | 14.85±0.32b | 32.11±0.72abc | 2.37±0.21ab | 1.03±0.12a | 23.56±0.33abc | 66.00±0.61ab | 501.67±1.53abcd | 184.33±8.33a | 815.77±6.51a | 70.28±0.12a | 29.33±2.08a | 71.34±0.42abc |
N2P1K1 | 14.93±0.23ab | 31.19±0.69bcd | 2.33±0.12ab | 1.18±0.22a | 22.90±1.37bcd | 65.73±0.58ab | 483.00±6.25cd | 156.67±12.34bc | 810.71±5.67a | 70.11±0.19a | 30.67±2.31a | 71.76±1.00ab |
Fig.1 Changes of interaction between N and P, N and K, P and K on grain yield of winter wheat Notes: 0, 1, 2, 3, N levels of 0、82.80、165.60、284.40 kg/hm2, respectively or P2O5 levels of 0、55.20、110.40、165.60 kg/hm2 or K2O levels of 0、22.95、45.90、68.85 kg/hm2
拟合方程 Fitting equations | R2 | |
---|---|---|
产量 Yield(kg/hm2) | Y=5 163.823 5+16.460 3N+15.502 0P+15.280 1K-0.040 9N2-0.053 8P2-0.195 4K2-0.016 1NP+0.020 1NK+0.013 5PK | 0.987 0 |
湿面筋含量 Wet gluten(kg/hm2) | Y=1 557.883 9+3.927 5N+7.321 9P+5.953 7K-0.013 2N2-0.027P2-0.030 7K2+0.008NP+0.0199NK-0.041 4PK | 0.988 1 |
蛋白质含量 Protein content (kg/hm2) | Y=725.804 4+2.460 1N+2.707 5P+1.916 9K-0.006 0N2+0.007 0P2+0.014 7K2-0.002 4NP+0.010 6NK-0.013 5PK | 0.982 1 |
淀粉干基 Starch dry base (kg/hm2) | Y=3 684.486 9+12.539 0N+10.466 4P-0.002 8K-0.029 8N2-0.040 5P2-0.168 6K2-0.015 3NP+0.002 2NK+0.048 5PK | 0.984 7 |
Tab.5 Fitting equation wintr wheat yield and main quality indicators
拟合方程 Fitting equations | R2 | |
---|---|---|
产量 Yield(kg/hm2) | Y=5 163.823 5+16.460 3N+15.502 0P+15.280 1K-0.040 9N2-0.053 8P2-0.195 4K2-0.016 1NP+0.020 1NK+0.013 5PK | 0.987 0 |
湿面筋含量 Wet gluten(kg/hm2) | Y=1 557.883 9+3.927 5N+7.321 9P+5.953 7K-0.013 2N2-0.027P2-0.030 7K2+0.008NP+0.0199NK-0.041 4PK | 0.988 1 |
蛋白质含量 Protein content (kg/hm2) | Y=725.804 4+2.460 1N+2.707 5P+1.916 9K-0.006 0N2+0.007 0P2+0.014 7K2-0.002 4NP+0.010 6NK-0.013 5PK | 0.982 1 |
淀粉干基 Starch dry base (kg/hm2) | Y=3 684.486 9+12.539 0N+10.466 4P-0.002 8K-0.029 8N2-0.040 5P2-0.168 6K2-0.015 3NP+0.002 2NK+0.048 5PK | 0.984 7 |
[1] | 李美宁, 耿卫东. 新疆伊犁河谷小麦生产现状及对策建议[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2022, 42(3): 147-150. |
LI Meining, GENG Weidong. Current situation of wheat production in the Ili River Valley of Xinjiang and suggestions for countermeasures[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2022, 42(3): 147-150. | |
[2] | Sawadi S Z, Noni G B. Effect of Addition and Organic Matter on Irrigation Efficiency, NPK Availability and Wheat Yield (L.)[C]//IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing, 2023, 1158(2): 022029. |
[3] | Nitharwal P K, Chauhan P S, Mandeewal R L, et al. Influence of Different Levels and Methods of NPK Fertilizer Application on the Growth and Production of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Arid Region of Rajasthan[J]. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 2022, 34(16): 107-114. |
[4] | Singh P, Chitale S, Lakpale R, et al. Effect of different NPK levels, splitting of soil application and foliar feeding of NPK (19: 19: 19) fertilizer on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)[J]. 2023, 12(3): 1344-1354. |
[5] | Duncan E G, O'Sullivan C A, Roper M M, et al. Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat increased with root length and biomass due to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium interactions[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2018, 181(3): 364-373. |
[6] | 孔凡斌, 郭巧苓, 潘丹. 中国粮食作物的过量施肥程度评价及时空分异[J]. 经济地理, 2018, 38(10): 201-210,240. |
KONG Fanbin, GUO Qiaoling, PAN Dan. Evaluation of the degree of over-fertilization and spatial and temporal divergence of grain crops in China[J]. Economic Geography, 2018, 38(10): 201-210,240. | |
[7] | 郝雯悦, 王西娜, 王月梅, 等. 小麦过量施肥的危害及化肥减施途径[J]. 现代农业科技, 2022, (24): 40-44,48. |
HAO Wenyue, WANG Xina, WANG Yuemei, et al. Hazards of over-fertilization of wheat and ways of fertilizer reduction[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, (24): 40-44,48. | |
[8] | 叶雪峰. 优化施肥和秸秆还田对旱地作物氮磷利用及径流损失的影响研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020. |
YE Xuefeng. Research on the effects of optimized fertilization and straw return on nitrogen and phosphorus utilization and runoff loss of dryland crops[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[9] | Wang Y, Wu Y, Cao C, et al. Effects of fertilizer reduction coupled with straw returning on soil fertility, wheat root endophytic bacteria, and the occurrence of wheat crown rot[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2023, 14: 1143480. |
[10] | 谭人伟. 探究农业面源污染防治的难点、问题及对策[J]. 低碳世界, 2019, 9(8): 60-61. |
TAN Renwei. Exploring the difficulties, problems and countermeasures of agricultural surface pollution prevention and control[J]. Low Carbon World, 2019, 9(8): 60-61. | |
[11] | 郭丹丹, 刘哲文, 常旭虹, 等. 不同氮磷钾肥处理对小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2022, (3): 47-52. |
GUO Dandan, LIU Zhewen, CHANG Xuhong, et al. Effects of different nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer treatments on yield and quality of wheat[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter, 2022, (3): 47-52. | |
[12] | 赵海波, 林琪, 刘义国, 等. 氮磷配施对“济麦22”小麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6): 1325-1332. |
ZHAO Haibo, LIN Qi, LIU Yiguo, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on the yield and quality of "Jimai 22" wheat[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2010, 16(6): 1325-1332. | |
[13] | 赵广才, 常旭虹, 杨玉双, 等. 氮磷钾运筹对不同小麦品种产量和品质的调节效应[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(1): 106-112. |
ZHAO Guangcai, CHANG Xuhong, YANG Yushuang, et al. Regulatory effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium transport on yield and quality of different wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2011, 31(1): 106-112. | |
[14] | 魏双雨, 李敏, 吉文丽, 等. 适宜氮磷钾用量和配比提高油用牡丹产量和出油量[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(5): 880-888. |
WEI Shuangyu, LI Min, JI Wenli, et al. Appropriate dosage and ratio of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium to improve the yield and oil production of oil peony[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2019, 25(5): 880-888. | |
[15] | 詹其厚, 王慎强, 周静, 等. 沿淮低洼地玉米施肥效应与土壤供肥能力研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2011, 42(6): 1415-1419. |
ZHAN Qihou, WANG Shenqiang, ZHOU Jing, et al. Study on fertilization effects on maize and soil nutrient supply capacity in lowland along Huaihe river[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2011, 42 (6):1415-1419. | |
[16] |
孙小花, 谢亚萍, 牛俊义, 等. 不同供钾水平对胡麻花后干物质转运分配及钾肥利用效率的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015,(1): 192-201.
DOI |
SUN Xiaohua, XIE Yaping, NIU Junyi, et al. Effects of different levels of potassium supply on post-flowering dry matter translocation allocation and potash utilization efficiency in Huzhou[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, (1): 192-201.
DOI |
|
[17] | 马海洋, 石伟琦, 刘亚男, 等. 氮, 磷, 钾肥对卡因菠萝产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4): 901-907. |
MA Haiyang, SHI Wenqi, LIU Yanan, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on yield and quality of pineapple in Cayenne[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(4): 901-907. | |
[18] | 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 陈刚, 等. 稻米的品质和影响因素[J]. 分子植物育种, 2003, 1(2): 231-241. |
WANG Zhong, GU Yunjie, CHEN Gang, et al. Quality of rice and factors affecting it[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2003, 1(2): 231-241. | |
[19] | 王成瑷, 张文香, 赵磊, 等. 氮磷钾肥料用量对水稻产量与品质的影响[J]. 吉林农业科学, 2010, 35(1): 28-33. |
WANG Chengai, ZHANG Wenxiang, ZHAO Lei, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on rice yield and quality[J]. Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 35(1): 28-33. | |
[20] |
魏冬峰, 张利霞, 常青山, 等. 氮磷钾平衡施肥对凤丹光合特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2016,(11): 2265-2273.
DOI |
WEI Dongfeng, ZHANG Lixia, CHANG Qingshan, et al. Effects of balanced fertilization with nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on photosynthetic characteristics of Fengdan[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2016,(11): 2265-2273.
DOI |
|
[21] | 杜少平, 马忠明, 薛亮. 氮磷钾配施对砂田西瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(2): 468-475. |
DU Shaoping, MA Zhongming, XUE Liang. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium rationing on yield and quality of watermelon in sand field[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016, 22(2): 468-475. | |
[22] | 李生秀. 植物营养与肥料学科的现状与展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1999, 5(3): 193-205. |
LI Shengxiu. Current status and prospects of plant nutrition and fertilizer[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 1999, 5(3): 193-205. | |
[23] | 刘刚, 殷浩, 罗春燕, 等. 不同施肥处理对桑叶产量及其品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2): 506-511. |
LIU Gang, YIN Hao, LUO Chunyan, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on the yield and quality of mulberry leaves[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(2): 506-511. | |
[24] | 王峰, 王顺霞, 王占军, 等. 不同施肥水平与组合对玉米生产性能的影响研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2005, 19(4): 167-171. |
WANG Feng, WANG Shunxia, WANG Zhanjun, et al. Effects of different fertilization levels and combinations on maize production performance[J]. Arid Zone Resources and Environment, 2005, 19(4): 167-171. | |
[25] |
李浩, 徐瑞, 施辉能, 等. 氮磷钾配施对玛咖产量和品质的影响及肥料效应[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(10): 2404-2412.
DOI |
LI Hao, XU Rui, SHI Huineng, et al. Effects of Combined application of N,P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of lepidium meyenii and its fertilizer interaction[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 35(10): 2404-2412.
DOI |
|
[26] | 许丹枫, 罗丹丹, 夏运生, 等. 氮、钾配施对杭菊生长、产量和元素含量的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(10): 2360-2366. |
XU Danfeng, LUO Dandan, XIA Yunsheng, et al. Effects of combined application of nitrogen and potassium on growth,yield and mineral elements of chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 32(10): 2360-2366.). | |
[27] | 苏文华, 张光飞, 王泽明, 等. 氮,磷和钾肥对灯盏花生长和有效成分积累的影响[J]. 中草药, 2009, (12): 1963-1966. |
SU Wenhua, ZHANG Guangfei, WANG Zeming, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on the growth and active ingredient accumulation of Lampsia chinensis[J]. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2009, (12): 1963-1966. | |
[28] | 宋毓雪, 胡静洁, 孔德章, 等. 不同氮, 磷, 钾水平对苦荞产量和品质的影响[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2014, 41(3): 411-415. |
SONG Yuxue, HU Jinjie, KONG Dezhang, et al. Effects of different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on yield and quality of buckwheat[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural University, 2014, 41(3): 411-415. | |
[29] |
鲁泽刚, 卢迎春, 张广辉, 等. 氮磷钾配施对灯盏花产量和品质的影响及肥料效应[J]. 核农学报, 2019,(3): 616-622.
DOI |
LU Zegang, LU Yingchun, ZHANG Guanghong, et al. Influence of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium rationing on yield and quality of lamp blossom and fertilizer effect[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019,(3): 616-622.
DOI |
|
[30] | 姜东, 戴廷波, 荆奇, 等. 氮磷钾肥长期配合施用对冬小麦籽粒品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(4): 566-571. |
JIANG Dong, DAI Tingbo, JING Qi, et al. Effects of long-term combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on grain quality of winter wheat[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004, 37(4): 566-571. | |
[31] | 郑志松, 王晨阳, 牛俊义, 等. 水肥耦合对冬小麦籽粒蛋白质及氨基酸含量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(4): 788-793. |
ZHANG Zhisong, WANG Chenyang, NIU Junyi, et al. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on protein and amino acid content of winter wheat kernels[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 19(4): 788-793. | |
[32] | 熊江霞, 薛裕国, 郑建渠, 等. 磷钾配比对小麦品质和产量影响的研究[J]. 江苏耕地质量建设论文集, 2008. |
XIONG Jiangxia, XUE Yuguo, ZHENG Jianqu, et al. Effects of phosphorus and potassium ratios on wheat quality and yield[J]. Proceedings of Jiangsu Cultivated Land Quality Construction, 2008. | |
[33] | 朱英杰, 冯金凤, 常旭虹, 等. 氮磷钾肥对不同冬小麦产量及加工品质的影响[J]. 2018 中国作物学会学术年会论文摘要集, 2018. |
ZHU Yingjie, FENG Jinfeng, CHANG Xuhong, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on yield and processing quality of different winter wheat[J]. 2018 Crop Society of China Academic Annual Conference Abstracts Collection, 2018. | |
[34] | 张艳艳, 刘淋茹, 袁鑫茹, 等. 不同水分条件下施磷对冬小麦穗花结实及光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2024, (14): 1-15[2024-06-12]. |
ZHANG Yanyan, LIU Linfu, YUAN Xinru, et al. Effects of phosphorus application on spike floret development into grain and photosynthetic characteristics of winter wheat under different water treatments[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2024, (14): 1-15[2024-06-12]. | |
[35] | 李勇, 吕文河, 吕典秋, 等. 施氮水平对不同淀粉型马铃薯块茎产量和淀粉品质的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(3): 27-38. |
LI Yong, LV Wenhe, LV Dianqiu, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application rate on the tuber yield andstarch quality of potato varieties with different starch contents[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2019, 24(3): 27-38. | |
[36] | 周忠新, 于振文, 许卫霞, 等. 氮磷钾用量及配比对小麦产量、蛋白质含量和肥料利用率的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2006,(3): 42-44. |
ZhOU Zhongxin, YU Zhenwen, XU Weixia, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium dosage and ratio on wheat yield, protein content and fertilizer utilization[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2006,(3): 42-44. | |
[37] | 朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. |
ZHU Zhaoliang, JIN Jiyun. Fertilizer use and food security in China[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. | |
[38] |
吴兵, 高玉红, 谢亚萍, 等. 氮磷配施对旱地胡麻干物质积累和籽粒产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(5): 996-1004.
DOI |
WU Bing, GAO Yuhong. XIE Yaping, et al. Effects of nitrogen application combined with phosphorus on dry matter accumulation and seed yield of rain-fed flax[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(5): 996-1004.
DOI |
|
[39] | Mathe-Gaspar G, Radimszky L, Mathe P. Changes in growth parameters and water content of young canola in response to N fertilization on two sites[J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2008, 36: 1495-1498. |
[40] | 战秀梅, 韩晓日, 杨劲峰, 等. 不同氮, 磷, 钾肥用量对玉米源, 库干物质积累动态变化的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2007, 38(3): 495-499. |
ZHAN Xiumei, HAN Xiaori, YANG Jingfeng, et al. Dynamics changes of dry matter accumulation of maize as affected by different quantity of nitrogen and phosphorus and potassium[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2007, 38(3): 495-499. | |
[41] |
张均华, 刘建立, 张佳宝, 等. 施氮量对稻麦干物质转运与氮肥利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(10): 1736-1742.
DOI |
ZHANG Junhua, LIU Jianli, ZHANG Jiabao, et al. Utilization of nitrogen in rice and wheat effects of nitrogen application rates on translocation of dry matter and wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(10): 1736-1742.
DOI |
|
[42] | Cui Z, Zhang F, Chen X, et al. In-season nitrogen management strategy for winter wheat: Maximizing yields, minimizing environmental impact in an over-fertilization context[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 116(1-2): 140-146. |
[43] | 陆增根, 戴廷波, 姜东, 等. 氮肥运筹对弱筋小麦群体指标与产量和品质形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(4): 590-597. |
LU Zenggen, DAI Tingbo, JANG Dong, et al. Effeets of nitrogen strategies on population quality Index and grain yield & quality in Weak-Gluten wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(4): 590-597. | |
[44] | 王月福, 于振文, 李尚霞, 等. 土壤肥力和施氮量对小麦氮素吸收运转及籽粒产量和蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(11): 1868-1872. |
WANG Yuefu, YU Zhenwen, LI Shangxia, et al. Effects of soil fertility and nitrogen application rate on nitrogen absorption and translocation, grain yield, and grain protein content of wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(11): 1868-1872.
PMID |
|
[45] | 沈玉芳, 曲东, 王保莉, 等. 干旱胁迫下磷营养对不同作物苗期根系导水率的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2005, 31(2): 214-218. |
SHEN Yufang, QU Dong, WANG Baoli, et al. Effects of Phosphorus on Root Hydraulic Conductivity of Crops under Drought Stress[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31(2): 214-218. | |
[46] |
王乐政, 华方静, 曹鹏鹏, 等. 氮磷钾配施对红小豆干物质积累, 产量和效益的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(10): 2058-2067.
DOI |
WANG Lezheng, HUA Fanjing, CAO Pengpeng, et al. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium combined application ondry matter accumulation, yield and economic benefits of adzuki bean[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(10): 2058-2067.
DOI |
|
[47] | 闫湘, 金继运, 梁鸣早. 我国主要粮食作物化肥增产效应与肥料利用效率[J]. 土壤, 2017, 49(6): 1067-1077. |
YAN Xiang, JIN Jiyun, LIANG Mingzao. Fertilizer Use Efficiencies and Yield-increasing Rates of Grain Crops in China[J]. Soils, 2017, 49(6): 1067-1077. |
[1] | DU Yalong, FU Qiuping, AI Pengrui, MA Yingjie, QI Tong, PAN Yang. Comprehensive evaluation of irrigation treatment based on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated Gossypium barbadense [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 161-173. |
[2] | XIE Xiurong, ZHANG Yongqiang, HAI Feng, LEI Junjie, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, WANG Jichuan. Effects of uniform sowing and densification on population structure and yield of late sowing winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 21-28. |
[3] | HU Mengting, LIU Shengyao, JIA Songnan, FAN Fengcui, DU Fenghuan, LI Jingsong, QIN Yong. Effects of different planting row spacings on yield and water use efficiency of spinach [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 217-224. |
[4] | TANG Liping, Aminiguli , WANG Xu, FENG Xing, ZHENG Peiyu, YU Jianguo, ZHANG Yanwei, XIE Mengwan, DI Jiang, YU Lijuan. Analysis and evaluation of slaughter performance and meat quality characteristics of Luobu sheep [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 251-260. |
[5] | ZHANG Yanting, ZHANG Yongqiang, LEI Junjie, CHEN Hui, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, XU Wenxiu. Effects of different phosphorus application modes on photosynthetic physiological characteristics and yield of Dry-Seeded and Wet-Emerged winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 29-36. |
[6] | ZHANG Jingcan, XU Qijiang, ZHANG Yongqiang, LEI Junjie, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, XU Wenxiu. Effects of different growth regulator and its application times on stem characteristics and lodging resistance of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 37-44. |
[7] | HAI Feng, ZHANG Yongqiang, XIE Xiurong, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, WANG Jichuan, LEI Junjie. Effects of different drip irrigation rates on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of drip irrigated winter wheat under limited irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 45-52. |
[8] | LI Jie, XU Qijiang, ZHANG Yongqiang, XU Wenxiu, LYU Xiaoqing, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie. Effects of different urea and application methods on photosynthetic characteristics, yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 53-59. |
[9] | MA Lin, HUANG Qiannan, YANG Hui, Dengsilamu Tuerxunbai, ZOU Hui, SUN Na, LEI Junjie. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizers with humic acid strategies on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 60-67. |
[10] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHANG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effect of microbial agents combined with nitrogen fertilizer on the photosynthetic characteristics and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 68-74. |
[11] | LI Na, LYU Caixia, Xin Huinan, LI Yongfu, LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on the characteristics and root zone soil nutrients of drip irrigation wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 87-94. |
[12] | JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[13] | WU Yating, CHEN He, ZHENG Nan, MA Xianlan, ZHOU Lina, ZHAO Yankun. Current situation and development trend prospect of Xinjiang characteristic dairy industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 158-162. |
[14] | HOU Xianzheng, XIAO Tong, CHEN Yulan, WEI Jiyu. The spatial effects and mechanism of digital technology innovation on agricultural economic resilience [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 196-205. |
[15] | YUE Rongqiang, ZHANG Qiong, WANG Fang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. Improve the academic quality and influence of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 256-260. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 128
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 1591
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||