Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (2): 286-293.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.02.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
LU Mingkun1,2,3(), LI Junhong2,3, Nilupaier Yusufujiang4, PAN Xipeng4, LIU Xiaocheng1, ZHANG Zhenggui2,3, PAN Zhanlei2,3, ZHAI Menghua2,3, ZHANG Yaopeng2,3, ZHAO Wenqi2,3, WANG Lihong1, WANG Zhanbiao1,2,3(
)
Received:
2024-08-10
Online:
2025-02-20
Published:
2025-04-17
Correspondence author:
WANG Zhanbiao
Supported by:
陆明昆1,2,3(), 李军宏2,3, 尼陆排尔·于苏甫江4, 潘喜鹏4, 刘晓成1, 张正贵2,3, 潘占磊2,3, 翟梦华2,3, 张要朋2,3, 赵文琪2,3, 王丽宏1, 王占彪1,2,3(
)
通讯作者:
王占彪
作者简介:
陆明昆(1997-),女,河北唐山人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花抗逆栽培, (E-mail) 1838558355@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LU Mingkun, LI Junhong, Nilupaier Yusufujiang, PAN Xipeng, LIU Xiaocheng, ZHANG Zhenggui, PAN Zhanlei, ZHAI Menghua, ZHANG Yaopeng, ZHAO Wenqi, WANG Lihong, WANG Zhanbiao. Effect of silic on fertiliser application on the growth and development of cotton and its yield and quality[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 286-293.
陆明昆, 李军宏, 尼陆排尔·于苏甫江, 潘喜鹏, 刘晓成, 张正贵, 潘占磊, 翟梦华, 张要朋, 赵文琪, 王丽宏, 王占彪. 追施硅肥对棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 286-293.
生育时期 Age | 处理 Treatments | 株高 Height of plant (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thickness (mm) | 主茎节数 Number of nodes of main stem (个) | 始节位 Euclidian (节) | 始节高度 Height of beginning node (cm) | 果枝台数 Fruit branch number (个) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蕾期 Squaring stage | CK | 36.6±5.7a | 8.8±0.6b | 11.0±0.6a | 4.3±0.8ab | 14.4±3.4a | 7.3±1.6b |
S1 | 38.8±2.7a | 9.2±0.4ab | 11.3±0.5a | 4.5±1.1ab | 12.6±3.4a | 8.0±1.1ab | |
S2 | 40.0±5.2a | 10.0±0.9a | 11.3±1.0a | 4.2±0.4b | 12.4±1.5a | 9.0±1.1a | |
S3 | 41.3±3.6a | 9.9±0.8a | 11.7±0.5a | 5.3±1.0a | 15.6±4.1a | 8.0±0.9ab | |
花期 Flowering stage | CK | 96.4±7.2a | 11.8±3.9a | 17.2±3.8a | 5.3±0.5a | 18.5±7.1a | 11.8±3.8a |
S1 | 85.4±4.1b | 13.0±1.7a | 15.7±1.4a | 5.2±1.5a | 17.7±6.7a | 11.7±2.3a | |
S2 | 87.3±6.7b | 14.5±2.4a | 16.5±0.6a | 5.5±1.4a | 16.5±4.3a | 12.7±2.3a | |
S3 | 86.3±5.3b | 13.6±1.7a | 16.2±1.0a | 4.8±1.7a | 15.4±5.9a | 12.5±1.1a | |
铃期 Boll stage | CK | 92.3±6.2a | 14.6±1.2a | 17.7±1.0a | 5.3±0.8a | 14.1±4.5a | 12.8±2.2a |
S1 | 95.5±11.8a | 14.3±1.4a | 18.2±1.2a | 6.5±1.4a | 18.7±9.5a | 12.7±1.9a | |
S2 | 92.6±7.9a | 14.5±1.2a | 17.5±1.1a | 6.8±1.5a | 20.1±9.1a | 10.7±1.4a | |
S3 | 94.0±6.2a | 15.7±1.4a | 18.0±1.1a | 6.5±1.2a | 19.5±6.3a | 11.7±1.8a | |
吐絮期 Boll openning | CK | 101.5±2.5a | 14.3±0.5b | 15.8±0.8a | 4.7±0.8b | 16.0±2.7a | 12.3±0.5a |
S1 | 96.6±2.6b | 13.7±1.6b | 15.0±1.1a | 5.2±0.8ab | 15.53±4.3a | 12.3±1.0a | |
S2 | 94.6±3.8b | 16.8±3.6a | 15.8±1.5a | 3.5±0.6c | 10.7±2.3b | 13.3±0.8a | |
S3 | 92.4±5.8b | 13.1±0.9b | 14.7±1.4a | 6.0±1.4a | 16.4±5.3a | 11.2±1.2b |
Tab.1 Differences in agronomic traits among treatments at various fertility periods of cotton
生育时期 Age | 处理 Treatments | 株高 Height of plant (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thickness (mm) | 主茎节数 Number of nodes of main stem (个) | 始节位 Euclidian (节) | 始节高度 Height of beginning node (cm) | 果枝台数 Fruit branch number (个) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
蕾期 Squaring stage | CK | 36.6±5.7a | 8.8±0.6b | 11.0±0.6a | 4.3±0.8ab | 14.4±3.4a | 7.3±1.6b |
S1 | 38.8±2.7a | 9.2±0.4ab | 11.3±0.5a | 4.5±1.1ab | 12.6±3.4a | 8.0±1.1ab | |
S2 | 40.0±5.2a | 10.0±0.9a | 11.3±1.0a | 4.2±0.4b | 12.4±1.5a | 9.0±1.1a | |
S3 | 41.3±3.6a | 9.9±0.8a | 11.7±0.5a | 5.3±1.0a | 15.6±4.1a | 8.0±0.9ab | |
花期 Flowering stage | CK | 96.4±7.2a | 11.8±3.9a | 17.2±3.8a | 5.3±0.5a | 18.5±7.1a | 11.8±3.8a |
S1 | 85.4±4.1b | 13.0±1.7a | 15.7±1.4a | 5.2±1.5a | 17.7±6.7a | 11.7±2.3a | |
S2 | 87.3±6.7b | 14.5±2.4a | 16.5±0.6a | 5.5±1.4a | 16.5±4.3a | 12.7±2.3a | |
S3 | 86.3±5.3b | 13.6±1.7a | 16.2±1.0a | 4.8±1.7a | 15.4±5.9a | 12.5±1.1a | |
铃期 Boll stage | CK | 92.3±6.2a | 14.6±1.2a | 17.7±1.0a | 5.3±0.8a | 14.1±4.5a | 12.8±2.2a |
S1 | 95.5±11.8a | 14.3±1.4a | 18.2±1.2a | 6.5±1.4a | 18.7±9.5a | 12.7±1.9a | |
S2 | 92.6±7.9a | 14.5±1.2a | 17.5±1.1a | 6.8±1.5a | 20.1±9.1a | 10.7±1.4a | |
S3 | 94.0±6.2a | 15.7±1.4a | 18.0±1.1a | 6.5±1.2a | 19.5±6.3a | 11.7±1.8a | |
吐絮期 Boll openning | CK | 101.5±2.5a | 14.3±0.5b | 15.8±0.8a | 4.7±0.8b | 16.0±2.7a | 12.3±0.5a |
S1 | 96.6±2.6b | 13.7±1.6b | 15.0±1.1a | 5.2±0.8ab | 15.53±4.3a | 12.3±1.0a | |
S2 | 94.6±3.8b | 16.8±3.6a | 15.8±1.5a | 3.5±0.6c | 10.7±2.3b | 13.3±0.8a | |
S3 | 92.4±5.8b | 13.1±0.9b | 14.7±1.4a | 6.0±1.4a | 16.4±5.3a | 11.2±1.2b |
Fig.2 Comparisons of cotton biomass in different treatments Notes:CK、S1、S2、S3: The silicon application rate was 0、14.4、28.8、43.2 kg SiO2/hm2,respectively. SS: Squaring stage; FS: Flowering stage; BS: Boll stage; BO: Boll openning stage.Different small letters meant significant differenceamong treatments at 0.05 level
处理 Treatments | 收获密度 Harvest density (104株/hm2) | 单株铃数 Boll number per plant (个) | 单铃重 Single boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint cotton yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 12.2±0.2a | 9.3±0.1b | 4.9±0.1b | 47.91±0.0a | 5 475.6±166.5b | 2 623.8±91.6c |
S1 | 12.5±0.2a | 9.9±0.5a | 5.2±0.2ab | 45.70±0.0a | 6 386.4±276.3a | 2 918.4±153.6b |
S2 | 12.6±0.3a | 10.1±0.2a | 5.4±0.2a | 47.16±0.0a | 6 847.7±248.9a | 3 228.4±100.4a |
S3 | 12.4±0.5a | 10.1±0.3a | 5.3±0.3a | 47.02±0.0a | 6 566.7±578.0a | 3 083.3±202.6ab |
Tab.2 Comparisons of cotton yield and its components in different treatments
处理 Treatments | 收获密度 Harvest density (104株/hm2) | 单株铃数 Boll number per plant (个) | 单铃重 Single boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint cotton yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 12.2±0.2a | 9.3±0.1b | 4.9±0.1b | 47.91±0.0a | 5 475.6±166.5b | 2 623.8±91.6c |
S1 | 12.5±0.2a | 9.9±0.5a | 5.2±0.2ab | 45.70±0.0a | 6 386.4±276.3a | 2 918.4±153.6b |
S2 | 12.6±0.3a | 10.1±0.2a | 5.4±0.2a | 47.16±0.0a | 6 847.7±248.9a | 3 228.4±100.4a |
S3 | 12.4±0.5a | 10.1±0.3a | 5.3±0.3a | 47.02±0.0a | 6 566.7±578.0a | 3 083.3±202.6ab |
处理 Treatments | 上半部平均长度 Fiber length (mm) | 长度整齐度指数 Length Neatness Index(%) | 断裂比强度 Specific breaking strength (cN/tex) | 断裂伸长率 Elongation at break(%) | 马克隆值 Micronaire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 31.6±0.6a | 85.6±0.9b | 32.0±0.5a | 9.1±1.1a | 4.9±0.1ab |
S1 | 31.1±1.0ab | 87.3±0.5a | 33.5±1.2a | 8.6±0.7a | 4.5±0.2b |
S2 | 31.0±0.4ab | 86.9±0.3ab | 32.4±1.9a | 8.4±0.4a | 4.9±0.4ab |
S3 | 30.1±0.1b | 85.8±1.0b | 32.4±2.1a | 9.0±0.5a | 5.1±0.3a |
Tab.3 Fiber quality difference between silicon fertilizer treatment and control cotton
处理 Treatments | 上半部平均长度 Fiber length (mm) | 长度整齐度指数 Length Neatness Index(%) | 断裂比强度 Specific breaking strength (cN/tex) | 断裂伸长率 Elongation at break(%) | 马克隆值 Micronaire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 31.6±0.6a | 85.6±0.9b | 32.0±0.5a | 9.1±1.1a | 4.9±0.1ab |
S1 | 31.1±1.0ab | 87.3±0.5a | 33.5±1.2a | 8.6±0.7a | 4.5±0.2b |
S2 | 31.0±0.4ab | 86.9±0.3ab | 32.4±1.9a | 8.4±0.4a | 4.9±0.4ab |
S3 | 30.1±0.1b | 85.8±1.0b | 32.4±2.1a | 9.0±0.5a | 5.1±0.3a |
指标 Indicators | 株高 Height of plant | 茎粗 Stem thick- ness | 主茎节数 Number of nodes of main stem | 始节位 Eucl- idian | 始节 高度 Height of beginning node | 果枝 台数 Fruit branch number | 蕾花铃 Bud Fower Bell | 单株 铃数 Boll number per plant | 单铃重 Single boll weight | 衣分 Lint percentage | 籽棉 产量 Seed cotton yield | 皮棉 产量 Lint cotton yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Height of plant | 1 | |||||||||||
茎粗 Stem thickness | -0.04 | 1 | ||||||||||
主茎节数 Number of nodes of main stem | 0.53** | -0.06 | 1 | |||||||||
始节位 Euclidian | -0.00 | -0.46* | -0.07 | 1 | ||||||||
始节高度 Height of beginning node | 0.32 | -0.28 | -0.20 | 0.56** | 1 | |||||||
果枝台数 Fruit branch number | 0.42* | 0.24 | 0.44* | -0.50* | -0.21 | 1 | ||||||
蕾花铃 Bud Fower Bell | -0.06 | 0.59** | 0.32 | -0.55** | -0.52** | 0.58** | 1 | |||||
单株铃数 Boll number per plant | -0.03 | 0.31 | 0.22 | -0.16 | -0.38 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 1 | ||||
单铃重 Single boll weight | -0.01 | -0.20 | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.14 | -0.17 | -0.09 | 0.48* | 1 | |||
衣分 Lint percentage | -0.01 | 0.13 | 0.17 | -0.21 | -0.22 | -0.00 | 0.17 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 1 | ||
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.12 | -0.04 | -0.07 | 0.48* | 0.82** | -0.33 | 1 | |
皮棉产量 Lint cotton yield | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.10 | -0.25 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.83** | 0.79** | 0.16 | 0.79** | 1 |
Tab.4 Correlation between cotton main agronomic traits and yield traits under different treatments
指标 Indicators | 株高 Height of plant | 茎粗 Stem thick- ness | 主茎节数 Number of nodes of main stem | 始节位 Eucl- idian | 始节 高度 Height of beginning node | 果枝 台数 Fruit branch number | 蕾花铃 Bud Fower Bell | 单株 铃数 Boll number per plant | 单铃重 Single boll weight | 衣分 Lint percentage | 籽棉 产量 Seed cotton yield | 皮棉 产量 Lint cotton yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Height of plant | 1 | |||||||||||
茎粗 Stem thickness | -0.04 | 1 | ||||||||||
主茎节数 Number of nodes of main stem | 0.53** | -0.06 | 1 | |||||||||
始节位 Euclidian | -0.00 | -0.46* | -0.07 | 1 | ||||||||
始节高度 Height of beginning node | 0.32 | -0.28 | -0.20 | 0.56** | 1 | |||||||
果枝台数 Fruit branch number | 0.42* | 0.24 | 0.44* | -0.50* | -0.21 | 1 | ||||||
蕾花铃 Bud Fower Bell | -0.06 | 0.59** | 0.32 | -0.55** | -0.52** | 0.58** | 1 | |||||
单株铃数 Boll number per plant | -0.03 | 0.31 | 0.22 | -0.16 | -0.38 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 1 | ||||
单铃重 Single boll weight | -0.01 | -0.20 | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.14 | -0.17 | -0.09 | 0.48* | 1 | |||
衣分 Lint percentage | -0.01 | 0.13 | 0.17 | -0.21 | -0.22 | -0.00 | 0.17 | 0.39 | 0.12 | 1 | ||
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield | 0.03 | -0.07 | 0.25 | 0.28 | -0.12 | -0.04 | -0.07 | 0.48* | 0.82** | -0.33 | 1 | |
皮棉产量 Lint cotton yield | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 0.10 | -0.25 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.83** | 0.79** | 0.16 | 0.79** | 1 |
[1] | de Oliveira S A, Nunes de Macedo J R, dos Santos Rosa D. Eco-efficiency of poly (lactic acid)-starch-cotton composite with high natural cotton fiber content: environmental and functional value[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 217: 32-41. |
[2] | 国家统计局. 国家统计局关于2023年棉花产量的公告[J]. 中国棉花加工, 2023,(6): 15, 20. |
National Bureau of Statistics. Announcement of national bureau.Announcement of national bureau of statistics on cotton output in 2023[J]. China Cotton Processing, 2023,(6): 15, 20. | |
[3] | 张静. 新疆棉花种植农户绿色农业技术采纳行为研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2023. |
ZHANG Jing. Study on green agricultural technology adoption behavior of cotton farmers in Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2023. | |
[4] |
EPSTEIN E. SILICON[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1999, 50: 641-664
PMID |
[5] | Naidu S, Pandey J, Mishra L C, et al. Silicon nanoparticles: Synthesis, uptake and their role in mitigation of biotic stress[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2023, 255: 114783. |
[6] | 张鑫月, 翟玉莹. 不同胁迫下硅对植物的作用及发展前景[J]. 现代园艺, 2024,(1): 58-59, 64. |
ZHANG Xinyue, ZHAI Yuying. Effects of silicon on plants under different stresses and its development prospect[J]. Contemporary Horticulture, 2024,(1): 58-59, 64. | |
[7] | 宋兴宜, 刘昌华, 郭祥, 等. 施用有机硅肥对提高烤烟农艺性状和质量的作用[J]. 中南农业科技, 2023,(9): 3-5. |
SONG Xingyi, LIU Changhua, GUO Xiang, et al. Effect of applying silicone fertilizer on improving agronomic characters and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. South-Central Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023,(9): 3-5. | |
[8] |
Kah M, Kookana R S, Gogos A, et al. A critical evaluation of nanopesticides and nanofertilizers against their conventional analogues[J]. Nature Nanotechnology, 2018, 13(8): 677-684.
DOI PMID |
[9] | Gomaa A, Kandil E, El-Banna A, et al. Response of some maize hybrids to foliar application of silicon under soil affected by salinity[J]. Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H Botany, 2021, 12(1): 1-8. |
[10] | 马新. 石河子垦区土壤有效硅的空间分布与硅肥肥效[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2015. |
MA Xin. Spatial distribution of soil available silicon and its fertilizer efficiency in Shihezi reclamation area[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015. | |
[11] | 孙浩妍, 纪武鹏. 硅肥对玉米农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2021,(7): 47-48. |
SUN Haoyan, JI Wupeng. Effect of silicon fertilizer on agronomic traits and yield of maize[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2021,(7): 47-48. | |
[12] |
孙星, 朱克亚, 刘勤, 等. 皖南山区稻田土壤施用硅肥效应研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(6): 6-10.
DOI |
SUN Xing, ZHU Keya, LIU Qin, et al. Effect of silicon fertilizer application on paddy soil in mountainous area of southern Anhui Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(6): 6-10.
DOI |
|
[13] | 赖添奎, 邓裕娴, 葛少彬, 等. 施用硅肥对水稻稻瘟病、生长及产量的影响[J]. 热带农业工程, 2012, 36(2): 6-8. |
LAI Tiankui, DENG Yuxian, GE Shaobin, et al. Effects of silicon fertilizer on rice blast control, rice growth and yield[J]. Tropical Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 36(2): 6-8. | |
[14] | 刘鹏, 卜文宣, 王斌, 等. 硅肥对马铃薯生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2023,(5): 88-92. |
LIU Peng, BU Wenxuan, WANG Bin, et al. Effect of silicon fertilizer on potato growth and development and yield quality[J]. China Vegetables, 2023,(5): 88-92. | |
[15] |
李欣欣, 赵强, 张特, 等. 叶面喷施硅锌肥对棉花生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2023, 50(3): 13-17.
DOI |
LI Xinxin, ZHAO Qiang, ZHANG Te, et al. Effects of foliar application of silicon and zinc fertilizer on cotton growth, yield and fiber quality[J]. China Cotton, 2023, 50(3): 13-17.
DOI |
|
[16] | 李阳. 不同施硅量对马铃薯农艺性状及产量品质的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2023. |
LI Yang. Effects of different silicon application rates on agronomic characters, yield and quality of potato[D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2023. | |
[17] | 郝立冬. 硅肥对春小麦生长及产量品质的影响[D]. 大庆: 黑龙江八一农垦大学, 2013. |
HAO Lidong. Effects of silicon fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of spring wheat[D]. Daqing: Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2013. | |
[18] |
张大伟, 魏鑫, 徐海江, 等. 滴施硅肥对棉花生长发育和产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(11): 1998-2003.
DOI |
ZHANG Dawei, WEI Xin, XU Haijiang, et al. Effects of silicon fertilizer on cotton growth, yield and quality[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(11): 1998-2003.
DOI |
|
[19] |
Khan M I R, Ashfaque F, Chhillar H, et al. The intricacy of silicon, plant growth regulators and other signaling molecules for abiotic stress tolerance: an entrancing crosstalk between stress alleviators[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 162: 36-47.
DOI PMID |
[20] | 陈健晓, 屠乃美, 易镇邪, 等. 硅肥对超级早稻产量形成和部分生理特性的影响[J]. 作物研究, 2011, 25(6): 544-549. |
CHEN Jianxiao, TU Naimei, YI Zhenxie, et al. Effects of silicon fertilizer on yield formation and some physiological characteristics of super early rice[J]. Crop Research, 2011, 25(6): 544-549. | |
[21] | 苏素苗, 杨春雷, 饶雄飞, 等. 硅对植物抗逆性影响的研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(6): 160-168. |
SU Sumiao, YANG Chunlei, RAO Xiongfei, et al. Progress on effects of silicon on plant stress resistance[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2022, 41(6): 160-168. | |
[22] | 罗赵福. 液体硅肥在水稻上的应用效果研究[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2022, 42(8): 76-77, 83. |
LUO Zhaofu. Study on the application effect of liquid silicon frtilizer on rice[J]. Horticulture & Seed, 2022, 42(8): 76-77, 83. | |
[23] | 孙德祥. 外源施加锌、硅肥对干旱胁迫下小麦旗叶生理特性及产量的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2015. |
SUN Dexiang. Effects of exogenous application of zinc and silicon fertilizers on physiological characteristics and yield of flag leaves of wheat under drought stress[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2015. | |
[24] | 施作家, 潘国庆, 周青, 等. 硅肥在棉花上的应用研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2001, 28(7): 17-18. |
SHI Zuojia, PAN Guoqing, ZHOU Qing, et al. Study on the application of silicon fertilizer in cotton[J]. China Cotton, 2001, 28(7): 17-18. | |
[25] | Boylston E K. Presence of silicon in developing cotton fibers[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1988, 11(12): 1739-1747. |
[1] | WANG Yongpan, MA Jun, LI Chenyu, YAO Mengyao, WANG Zixuan, HUANG Lingzhi, ZHU Haiyan, LIU Wanrong, LI Bo, YANG Yang, GAO Wenwei. Salt tolerance in germination period of cotton seeds based on convolutional neural network and synthetic dataset [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 261-269. |
[2] | HU Shasha, SHAO Liping, CHEN Lihua, SONG Weiping, ZHAO Hai, ZHANG Xinyu, SUN Jie. Effect of defoliant on boll development and fiber quality of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 270-277. |
[3] | LIU Yue, LIAN Shihao, LI Jiahao, WANG Hongyi, TIAN Wenqiang, NIE Lingfan, SUN Ganggang, JIA Yonghong, SHI Shubing, YU Yuehua, ZHANG Jinshan. Effects of sowing dates and planting density on yield formation and quality of peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 278-285. |
[4] | WANG Yiding, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Lingjian, ZHANG Hui, GUO Xiaomeng, CHEN Guoyue. Effects of drip irrigation on the growth and development, yield formation, and water use efficiency of cotton in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 294-301. |
[5] | WANG Xiaoyan, BAI Yungang, CHAI Zhongping, LU Zhenlin, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, Amannisa . Effect of "dry sowing and wet emergence" on cotton growth and yield under the control of winter drip irrigation in off-cropping period [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 302-313. |
[6] | ZHANG Tengyi, LI Qianli, FENG Beibei, NAN Kun, YAN Peng, GENG Wenjuan. Determination of harvest date of Golden Delicious, Harlikar and Ruixue apples and their dynamic study on fruit quality [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 314-323. |
[7] | LI Tianle, BAI Xinlu, AN Shijie, ZHENG Qiangqing, TANG Zhihui, ZHI Jinhu. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on the growth, fruit quality and yield of Korla Fragrant Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 335-342. |
[8] | YIN Meilin, LIN Minjuan, JING Shuangquan, XIONG Renci. Effects of branch pulling angles on photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of jujube [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 343-349. |
[9] | SI Yane, Rukeyanmu Maitisidike, Aikebaier Yilahong, YANG Qifeng. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on quality of Lycium barbarum L. and soil enzyme activity [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 350-360. |
[10] | YE Duoduo, MENG Xintao, Gulimire Zununa, Abidaimu Abudureyimu, Kuerbannayi Tuerxunmaimaiti, ZHANG Ting, MA Yan, PAN Yan. Quality change characteristics of not from concentrate (NFC) Lycium barbarum juice during processing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 361-372. |
[11] | ZHANG Jinqiang, YANG Xiang, SU Xuede, WANG Huanhuan, LI Ming, LI Pengcheng. Evaluation of fruit quality difference of sweet cherry under different cultivation modes in solar greenhouse in northern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 446-453. |
[12] | HAN Xiqing, ZHANG Xianhua, YUAN Hui, XIONG Hui, SA Chenghui. Analysis and evaluation of morphological characteristics and yield of 10 Phleum pratense (L. ) plants [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 454-462. |
[13] | XU Yingyue, HOU Yurong, ZHOU Chenye, WANG Jing, LI Youzheng, ZHOU Qi, LAN Jiyong, KE Mei, WEI Peng, WANG yuxiang. Effects of mixed sowing of Medicago sativa and Agropyron cristatum on forage quality [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 474-483. |
[14] | ZHENG Peiyu, Aminiguli , Aierdengbatu , Aoyunbateer , TANG Liping, ZHANG Yanwei, XIE Mengwan, DI Jiang, YU Lijuan. Comparative analysis of meat quality of Bayinbruk sheep of different months of age under natural grazing conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 494-501. |
[15] | SUN Na, MA Lin, ZOU Hui, ZHANG Zhihui, ZHANG Shengjun, HUANG Qiannan, YANG Hui, Dengsilamu Tuerxunbai, LI Zhibin, CAO Junmei, LEI Junjie. Analysis of combined application of NPK fertilizers on yield and quality of winter wheat and the fertilizer effect [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 1-12. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 17
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 50
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||