Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2790-2797.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.022
• Microbes · Horticultural Special Local Products·Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Lili1,2(), QIAN Tao3, CHEN Yan2, Wumaierjiang Baikeli2, LI Guangkuo1, DING Ruifeng1()
Received:
2023-03-05
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-12-07
Correspondence author:
DING Ruifeng(1985-), male, from Xinjiang, Researcher, research direction is weed comprehensive prevention and control in farmland, (E-mail)drf022@163.com
Supported by:
吴莉莉1,2(), 钱涛3, 陈艳2, 吾买尔江·拜克力2, 李广阔1, 丁瑞丰1()
通讯作者:
丁瑞丰(1985-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农田杂草综合防控,(E-mail)drf022@163.com
作者简介:
吴莉莉(1985-),女,河南人,高级农艺师,硕士,研究方向为农田有害生物综合治理,(E-mail)749858551@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WU Lili, QIAN Tao, CHEN Yan, Wumaierjiang Baikeli, LI Guangkuo, DING Ruifeng. Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797.
吴莉莉, 钱涛, 陈艳, 吾买尔江·拜克力, 李广阔, 丁瑞丰. 二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺对棉田一年生杂草的防治效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.022
处理 Treat- ments | 供试药剂 Herbicides | 制剂用药量 Dosage of formulation (g·mL/ 667m2) | 有效成 分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC | 150 | 742.5 |
2 | 175 | 866.25 | |
3 | 200 | 990 | |
4 | 350 | 1 732.5 | |
5 | 50%丙炔氟 草胺WP | 6 | 45 |
6 | 8 | 60 | |
7 | 10 | 75 | |
8 | 16 | 120 | |
9 | 330 g/mL二甲戊灵 EC+50%丙炔 氟草胺WP | 150+6 | 742.5+45 |
10 | 175+8 | 866.25+60 | |
11 | 人工除草 | - | - |
12 | 空白对照 | - | - |
Tab.1 Test design
处理 Treat- ments | 供试药剂 Herbicides | 制剂用药量 Dosage of formulation (g·mL/ 667m2) | 有效成 分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC | 150 | 742.5 |
2 | 175 | 866.25 | |
3 | 200 | 990 | |
4 | 350 | 1 732.5 | |
5 | 50%丙炔氟 草胺WP | 6 | 45 |
6 | 8 | 60 | |
7 | 10 | 75 | |
8 | 16 | 120 | |
9 | 330 g/mL二甲戊灵 EC+50%丙炔 氟草胺WP | 150+6 | 742.5+45 |
10 | 175+8 | 866.25+60 | |
11 | 人工除草 | - | - |
12 | 空白对照 | - | - |
Ⅳ-3 | Ⅳ-4 | Ⅳ-6 | Ⅳ-5 | Ⅳ-7 | Ⅳ-1 | Ⅳ-12 | Ⅳ-9 | Ⅳ-11 | Ⅳ-2 | Ⅳ-8 | Ⅳ-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅲ-11 | Ⅲ-10 | Ⅲ-1 | Ⅲ-9 | Ⅲ-12 | Ⅲ-8 | Ⅲ-3 | Ⅲ-5 | Ⅲ-7 | Ⅲ-4 | Ⅲ-2 | Ⅲ-6 |
Ⅱ-4 | Ⅱ-12 | Ⅱ-7 | Ⅱ-11 | Ⅱ-8 | Ⅱ-10 | Ⅱ-5 | Ⅱ-2 | Ⅱ-6 | Ⅱ-3 | Ⅱ-1 | Ⅱ-9 |
Ⅰ-2 | Ⅰ-6 | Ⅰ-12 | Ⅰ-1 | Ⅰ-5 | Ⅰ-11 | Ⅰ-8 | Ⅰ-7 | Ⅰ-9 | Ⅰ-10 | Ⅰ-4 | Ⅰ-3 |
Tab.2 Plot arrangement
Ⅳ-3 | Ⅳ-4 | Ⅳ-6 | Ⅳ-5 | Ⅳ-7 | Ⅳ-1 | Ⅳ-12 | Ⅳ-9 | Ⅳ-11 | Ⅳ-2 | Ⅳ-8 | Ⅳ-10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅲ-11 | Ⅲ-10 | Ⅲ-1 | Ⅲ-9 | Ⅲ-12 | Ⅲ-8 | Ⅲ-3 | Ⅲ-5 | Ⅲ-7 | Ⅲ-4 | Ⅲ-2 | Ⅲ-6 |
Ⅱ-4 | Ⅱ-12 | Ⅱ-7 | Ⅱ-11 | Ⅱ-8 | Ⅱ-10 | Ⅱ-5 | Ⅱ-2 | Ⅱ-6 | Ⅱ-3 | Ⅱ-1 | Ⅱ-9 |
Ⅰ-2 | Ⅰ-6 | Ⅰ-12 | Ⅰ-1 | Ⅰ-5 | Ⅰ-11 | Ⅰ-8 | Ⅰ-7 | Ⅰ-9 | Ⅰ-10 | Ⅰ-4 | Ⅰ-3 |
处理 Treat- ments | 供试药剂 Herbicides | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 出苗率 Rate of emergence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC | 742.5 | 76.67±2.08a |
2 | 866.25 | 81.11±1.20a | |
3 | 990 | 78.89±5.31a | |
4 | 1 732.5 | 83.89±3.59a | |
5 | 50%丙炔氟草胺WP | 45 | 81.94±2.77a |
6 | 60 | 81.39±4.17a | |
7 | 75 | 78.33±0.72a | |
8 | 120 | 80.22±4.38a | |
9 | 330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC+50% 丙炔氟草胺WP | 742.5+45 | 80.28±2.42a |
10 | 866.25+60 | 80.00±3.19a | |
11 | 人工除草 | - | 81.39±2.66a |
12 | 空白对照 | - | 78.89±2.94a |
Tab.3 Investigation results of seedling emergence rate of different treatments
处理 Treat- ments | 供试药剂 Herbicides | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 出苗率 Rate of emergence (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC | 742.5 | 76.67±2.08a |
2 | 866.25 | 81.11±1.20a | |
3 | 990 | 78.89±5.31a | |
4 | 1 732.5 | 83.89±3.59a | |
5 | 50%丙炔氟草胺WP | 45 | 81.94±2.77a |
6 | 60 | 81.39±4.17a | |
7 | 75 | 78.33±0.72a | |
8 | 120 | 80.22±4.38a | |
9 | 330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC+50% 丙炔氟草胺WP | 742.5+45 | 80.28±2.42a |
10 | 866.25+60 | 80.00±3.19a | |
11 | 人工除草 | - | 81.39±2.66a |
12 | 空白对照 | - | 78.89±2.94a |
处理 Treatments | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 药后30 d株防效 30 days after application | 药后45 d株防效 45 days after application | 药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 742.5 | 83.46±2.87cd | 82.59±1.95fg | 81.77%±0.41d |
2 | 866.25 | 85.71±3.75c | 83.58±2.51f | 85.09%±1.03c |
3 | 990 | 90.23±4.71b | 89.55±1.25e | 88.20%±0.57b |
4 | 1 732.5 | 96.24±3.13a | 92.54±2.88cd | 91.41%±1.17a |
5 | 45 | 81.95±3.26d | 80.60±4.21g | 81.21%±2.48d |
6 | 60 | 84.96±1.23c | 84.58±1.71f | 85.67%±1.52bc |
7 | 75 | 90.98±3.27b | 90.55±2.95de | 88.17%±2.83b |
8 | 120 | 95.49±2.53a | 94.03±4.84bc | 91.56%±1.37a |
9 | 742.5+45 | 96.24±1.63a | 96.02±1.58ab | 92.41±1.03a |
10 | 866.25+60 | 96.99±0.75a | 97.01±1.90a | 94.29±1.05a |
11 | - | 94.74±3.44a | 94.53±4.25abc | 91.48%±1.95a |
Tab.4 Control of different treatments on annual gramineous weeds in cotton field
处理 Treatments | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 药后30 d株防效 30 days after application | 药后45 d株防效 45 days after application | 药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 742.5 | 83.46±2.87cd | 82.59±1.95fg | 81.77%±0.41d |
2 | 866.25 | 85.71±3.75c | 83.58±2.51f | 85.09%±1.03c |
3 | 990 | 90.23±4.71b | 89.55±1.25e | 88.20%±0.57b |
4 | 1 732.5 | 96.24±3.13a | 92.54±2.88cd | 91.41%±1.17a |
5 | 45 | 81.95±3.26d | 80.60±4.21g | 81.21%±2.48d |
6 | 60 | 84.96±1.23c | 84.58±1.71f | 85.67%±1.52bc |
7 | 75 | 90.98±3.27b | 90.55±2.95de | 88.17%±2.83b |
8 | 120 | 95.49±2.53a | 94.03±4.84bc | 91.56%±1.37a |
9 | 742.5+45 | 96.24±1.63a | 96.02±1.58ab | 92.41±1.03a |
10 | 866.25+60 | 96.99±0.75a | 97.01±1.90a | 94.29±1.05a |
11 | - | 94.74±3.44a | 94.53±4.25abc | 91.48%±1.95a |
处理 Treatments | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 药后30 d株防效 30 days after application | 药后45 d株防效 45 days after application | 药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 742.5 | 80.52±4.28e | 80.14±5.21e | 80.21±2.12f |
2 | 866.25 | 83.12±3.95de | 82.62±2.77de | 84.49±1.74de |
3 | 990 | 85.06±3.65d | 84.75±1.34d | 88.90±2.36c |
4 | 1 732.5 | 91.56±3.27c | 90.43±2.80c | 90.58±2.49bc |
5 | 45 | 83.77±3.65de | 83.33±1.53de | 82.96±2.46e |
6 | 60 | 85.06±1.06d | 85.82±3.42d | 86.14±1.17d |
7 | 75 | 92.21±1.30c | 91.13±3.58bc | 90.66±2.28bc |
8 | 120 | 96.10±1.41ab | 94.33±3.27ab | 92.84±4.26ab |
9 | 742.5+45 | 96.75±1.09a | 95.74±2.04a | 93.52±3.29a |
10 | 866.25+60 | 98.70±1.25a | 96.10±1.74a | 94.65±1.92a |
11 | - | 92.86±2.88bc | 94.33%±4.25ab | 90.22±3.56c |
Tab.5 Control of different treatments on annual broad-leaved weeds in cotton field
处理 Treatments | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 药后30 d株防效 30 days after application | 药后45 d株防效 45 days after application | 药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 742.5 | 80.52±4.28e | 80.14±5.21e | 80.21±2.12f |
2 | 866.25 | 83.12±3.95de | 82.62±2.77de | 84.49±1.74de |
3 | 990 | 85.06±3.65d | 84.75±1.34d | 88.90±2.36c |
4 | 1 732.5 | 91.56±3.27c | 90.43±2.80c | 90.58±2.49bc |
5 | 45 | 83.77±3.65de | 83.33±1.53de | 82.96±2.46e |
6 | 60 | 85.06±1.06d | 85.82±3.42d | 86.14±1.17d |
7 | 75 | 92.21±1.30c | 91.13±3.58bc | 90.66±2.28bc |
8 | 120 | 96.10±1.41ab | 94.33±3.27ab | 92.84±4.26ab |
9 | 742.5+45 | 96.75±1.09a | 95.74±2.04a | 93.52±3.29a |
10 | 866.25+60 | 98.70±1.25a | 96.10±1.74a | 94.65±1.92a |
11 | - | 92.86±2.88bc | 94.33%±4.25ab | 90.22±3.56c |
处理 Treatments | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 药后30 d株防效 30 days after application (%) | 药后45 d株防效 45 days after application (%) | 药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 742.5 | 81.88±2.80f | 81.16±3.41e | 80.59±1.22f |
2 | 866.25 | 84.32±2.35e | 83.02±3.53de | 84.82±1.56e |
3 | 990 | 87.46±3.37d | 86.75±4.76c | 88.50±2.55d |
4 | 1 732.5 | 93.73±3.61bc | 91.30±1.04b | 91.04±1.25bc |
5 | 45 | 82.93±1.75ef | 82.19±2.84e | 81.97±1.25f |
6 | 60 | 85.02±2.88e | 85.30±2.24cd | 85.88±2.26e |
7 | 75 | 91.64±3.23c | 90.89±4.33b | 89.26±3.27cd |
8 | 120 | 95.82±3.74ab | 94.20±3.26a | 92.84±1.85b |
9 | 742.5+45 | 96.52±2.9a | 95.86±3.04a | 92.89±1.83ab |
10 | 866.25+60 | 97.91±1.7a | 96.48±2.75a | 94.44±2.69a |
11 | - | 93.73±2.96bc | 94.41±2.75a | 90.93±1.06bc |
Tab.6 Control effect of different treatments on annual weeds in cotton field
处理 Treatments | 有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm2) | 药后30 d株防效 30 days after application (%) | 药后45 d株防效 45 days after application (%) | 药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 742.5 | 81.88±2.80f | 81.16±3.41e | 80.59±1.22f |
2 | 866.25 | 84.32±2.35e | 83.02±3.53de | 84.82±1.56e |
3 | 990 | 87.46±3.37d | 86.75±4.76c | 88.50±2.55d |
4 | 1 732.5 | 93.73±3.61bc | 91.30±1.04b | 91.04±1.25bc |
5 | 45 | 82.93±1.75ef | 82.19±2.84e | 81.97±1.25f |
6 | 60 | 85.02±2.88e | 85.30±2.24cd | 85.88±2.26e |
7 | 75 | 91.64±3.23c | 90.89±4.33b | 89.26±3.27cd |
8 | 120 | 95.82±3.74ab | 94.20±3.26a | 92.84±1.85b |
9 | 742.5+45 | 96.52±2.9a | 95.86±3.04a | 92.89±1.83ab |
10 | 866.25+60 | 97.91±1.7a | 96.48±2.75a | 94.44±2.69a |
11 | - | 93.73±2.96bc | 94.41±2.75a | 90.93±1.06bc |
[1] | 国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M], 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022. |
State Statistical Bureau. China Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2022. | |
[2] | 李欢欢, 马小艳, 姜伟丽, 等. 棉田化学除草现状及对策[J], 中国棉花, 2019, 46(5):1-7,10. |
LI Huanhuan, MA Xiaoyan, JIANG Weili, et al. Current status and countermeasure of chemical weeding in cotton fields[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(5):1-7,10. | |
[3] | 马小艳, 马艳, 彭军, 等. 我国棉田杂草研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(4):372-380. |
MA Xiaoyan, MA Yan, PENG Jun, et al. Current situation and developing tendency of the weed researches in cotton field of China[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2010, 22(4):372-380. | |
[4] | 郭文磊, 王兆振, 谭金妮, 等. 氟咯草酮与二甲戊灵或乙草胺复配的联合除草作用及其对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2016, 18(5):605-611. |
GUO Wenlei, WANG Zhaozhen, TAN Jinni, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of fluorochloridone combined with pendimethalin or acetochlor[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2016, 18(5):605-611. | |
[5] | 王恒智, 谭金妮, 吕学深, 等. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵复配的联合除草作用及对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2018, 20(3):309-315. |
WANG Zhiheng, TAN Jinni, LYU Xueshen, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of the combination of flumioxazin and pendimethalin[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2018, 20(3):309-315. | |
[6] |
Nalini K, Muthukrishnan P, Chinnusamy C. Evaluation of pendimethalin 38.7 EC on weed management in winter irrigated cotton[J]. Madras Agricultural Journal, 2011, 98(4-6):165-168.
DOI URL |
[7] | 张学坤, 惠慧, 赵静, 等. 新疆棉田田旋花对二甲戊灵的耐药性测定[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(7):542-545. |
ZHANG Xuekun, HUI Hui, ZHAO Jing, et al. identification of field bindweed(Convolvulus arvensis L.) tolerance to pendimethalin in cotton field in Xin Jiang[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(7):542-545. | |
[8] |
Shrestha A, Fidelibus M. Grapevine row orientation affects light environment, growth,and development of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum)[J]. Weed Science, 2005, 53: 802-812.
DOI URL |
[9] | 姜辉, 王秀丽, 高明伟, 等. 抗草甘膦棉花高效简化栽培技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2017, 44(8):36-38. |
JIANG Hui, WANG Xiuli, GAO Mingwei, et al. The Efficient- and simplified-techniques for cultivation of Glyphosate-resistant cottons[J]. China Cotton, 2017, 44(8):36-38. | |
[10] |
Jiang H L, Deng X X, Wang J G, et al. Effects of gibberellic acid and N, N-dimethyl piperidinium chloride on the dose of and physiological responses to prometryn in black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4):e93654.
DOI URL |
[11] | 梁友, 贾会娟, 董雪, 等. 4种土壤处理除草剂对龙葵的防除效果及安全性评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(1):102-108. |
LIANG You, JIA Huijuan, DONG Xue, et al. The Effects of Four Soil-applied Herbicides on Control of Solanum nigrum L.and Safety Evaluation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2014, 36(1):102-108. | |
[12] | 贾芳, 崔海兰, 李香菊, 等. 耐草甘膦杂草的研究现状[J]. 杂草学报, 2019, 37(1):1-9. |
JIA Fang, CUI Hailan, LI Xiangju, et al. The current status of Glyphosate-tolerant weeds[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2019, 37(1):1-9. | |
[13] |
Beckie H J, Ashworth M B, Flower K C. Herbicide resistance management: recent developments and trends[J]. Plants, 2019, 8(6):161.
DOI URL |
[14] | 黄华树. 丙炔氟草胺述评[J]. 农药, 2016, 55(10):778-780. |
HUANG Huashu. Introduction of flumioxazin[J]. Agrochemical, 2016, 55(10):778-780. | |
[15] | Kwon J, Armbrust K, Grey T. Hydrolysis and photolysis of flumioxazin in aqueous buffer solutions[J]. Pest Managment Science, 2004, 60:939-943. |
[16] | GB/T 17980. 128-2004.农药田间药效试验准则(二)第128部分:除草剂防治棉花田杂草[S]. |
GB/T 17980. 128-2004.Guidelines for field efficacy trials(Ⅱ)-Part 128: Herbicide against weeds in cotton[S]. | |
[17] | Coakes S J. SPSS:Analysis without Anguish:version 20.0 for Windows[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2013. |
[18] | 赵冰梅, 丁丽丽, 张强, 等. 42%氟啶草酮悬浮剂桶混二甲戊灵对覆膜棉田恶性杂草防除效果及安全性[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(2):33-36. |
ZHAO Bingmei, DING Lili, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of a Tank Mixture with Fluridone 42% SC plus Pendimethalin for Controlling Malignant Weeds in Mulched Cotton Field[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(2):33-36. | |
[19] | 黄红娟, 张朝贤, 姜翠兰, 等. 北疆棉田杂草多样性及群落组成[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(1):7-13. |
HUANG Hongjuan, ZHANG Chaoxian, JIANG Cuilan, et al. Diversity and community composition of weeds in cotton fields of Northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(1):7-13. | |
[20] | 谭金妮, 李琦, 郭文磊, 等. 丙炔氟草胺对除草活性及对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2017, 19(2):189-194. |
TAN Jinni, LI Qi, GUO Wenlei, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of flumioxazin[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2017, 19(2): 189-194. | |
[21] |
赵娜娜, 冯佳楠, 王盼盼, 等. 34%丙炔氟草胺·二甲戊灵乳油对棉田阔叶杂草的防除效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):779-784.
DOI |
ZHAO Nana, FENG Jianan, WANG Panpan, et al. Field Efficacy of 34% flumioxazin·pendimethalin EC on Broadleaved Weeds in Cotton Field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4):779-784.
DOI |
|
[22] | 辛志梅, 刘甲魁. 50%丙炔氟草胺(速收)防除花生田杂草试验[J]. 山东农业科学, 2007,(6): 79-80. |
XIN Zhimei, LIU Jiakui. Test of 50% flumioxaxin on controlling weeds in groundnut fields[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(6):79-80. | |
[23] | 赵冰梅, 朱玉永, 王林. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵混配使用对棉田杂草的防除效果及棉花安全性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(3):250-255. |
ZHAO Bingmei, ZHU Yuyong, WANG Lin. Control effect of mixed used of flumioxazin and pendimethalin on weeds in cotton fields and safety to cotton[J]. Plant Protection, 2021, 47(3):250-255. |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[3] | WANG Hui, GUO Jincheng, SONG Jia, ZHANG Tingjun, He Liangrong. Physiological and biochemical analysis of transgenic offspring of upland cotton GhCIPK6 under high temperature Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119. |
[4] | YANG Chuan, ZHANG Kai, CHEN Bing, ZHANG Hui, LIU Ping, CHANG Song, SHENG Jiandong. Responses of morphological characteristics of cotton to different water conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127. |
[5] | ZHU Yujie, LIN Ling, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Effect of modified cotton straw charcoal on ammonia volatilization characteristics of nitrogen fertilizer in grey desert soils of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2128-2137. |
[6] | YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[7] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[8] | LI Xueling, GUO Junxian, CHEN Li, SONG Heling, ZHANG Zhong. Effects of Different Film Mulching Width on Cotton Farmland Environment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847. |
[9] | YANG Ni, Mayila Yusuyin, YANG Yanlong, LI Chunping, ZHANG Dawei, XU Haijiang, LAI Chengxia. Comparative analysis of plant volatiles from the Verticillium-Infected withered spot and etiolated leaves in cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986. |
[10] | WEI Yingfeng, ZHANG Quancheng, ZHA Hui, WANG Xiaoli, WANG Jungang. Effect of pendimethalin on the main growth and development and physiological indicators of Solanum nigrum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021. |
[11] | Mierzhati Mutalifu, SHI Xiunan, BO Junbing, Zubaidai Abudukerimu, Wulejialehasi Azhati, SHI Shubing. Effects of different delinting modes on seed vigor and seedling characteristics of cotton under PEG stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568. |
[12] | DUAN Songjiang, PENG Zengying, SHEN Yingying, Mulidier Baibolati, WU Yifan, CUI jianping, ZHANG Jusong. Responses of seed cotton yield and fiber quality of different sea island cotton varieties to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579. |
[13] | LIN Ling, ZHU Yujie, FENG Lei, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Features of aged cotton stalk charcoal and its effect on ammonia volatilization from sand soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1580-1588. |
[14] | XUE Zhengxuan, CAI Zhiping, ZHANG Zhijian, PENG Tianxiang, HUANG Zhiwei, HUANG Enze, WANG Peiling, LU Yanhui. Transfer of Hippodamia variegate between licorice and cotton fields based on rubidium marker technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1741-1747. |
[15] | JIANG Zhu, ZHANG Jianghui, BAI Yungang, YANG Pengnian, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, LIU Xuhui. Effects of fertilizer and salt regulation on cotton growth and yield under plastic film drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||