Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 832-840.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.006
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
YANG Minghua(), LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan
Received:
2022-07-29
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
YANG Minghua(1983-),female,Master candidate,Associate researcher,Weiyuan,Sichuan Provinae;research direction:Maize genetic breeding and cultivation,(E-mail)Supported by:
杨明花(), 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山
作者简介:
杨明花(1983-),女,四川威远人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为玉米遗传育种及栽培,(E-mail)xjymh123@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
杨明花, 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山. 不完全双列杂交玉米组合抗倒伏综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.006
性状 Traits | 基部3粗 3rd node Stem diameter | 基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 基3穿 3rd node RPS | 穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 基4弯 4th node BS | 穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 0.975** | |||||||
穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 0.922** | 0.924** | ||||||
基3穿3rd node RPS | 0.145 | 0.081 | 0.117 | |||||
穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 0.011 | 0.062 | 0.225 | 0.890** | ||||
基4弯4th node BS | 0.671** | 0.555** | 0.561** | 0.839** | 0.635** | |||
穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 0.540** | 0.498** | 0.653** | 0.732** | 0.703** | 0.908** | ||
单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant | 0.381* | 0.411** | 0.442** | 0.511** | 0.231 | 0.573** | 0.529** | |
茎秆抗推力 The stem resists thrust | -0.182 | -0.153 | -0.105 | 0.451** | 0.588** | 0.459** | 0.422** | 0.490** |
Tab.1 Correlation analysis of lodging resistance and yield in different maize varieties
性状 Traits | 基部3粗 3rd node Stem diameter | 基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 基3穿 3rd node RPS | 穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 基4弯 4th node BS | 穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 0.975** | |||||||
穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 0.922** | 0.924** | ||||||
基3穿3rd node RPS | 0.145 | 0.081 | 0.117 | |||||
穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 0.011 | 0.062 | 0.225 | 0.890** | ||||
基4弯4th node BS | 0.671** | 0.555** | 0.561** | 0.839** | 0.635** | |||
穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 0.540** | 0.498** | 0.653** | 0.732** | 0.703** | 0.908** | ||
单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant | 0.381* | 0.411** | 0.442** | 0.511** | 0.231 | 0.573** | 0.529** | |
茎秆抗推力 The stem resists thrust | -0.182 | -0.153 | -0.105 | 0.451** | 0.588** | 0.459** | 0.422** | 0.490** |
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 穗高 Ear height | 穗长 Ear length | 秃尖长 Bar tip length | 穗粗 Ear diameter | 穗行数 Ear row number | 行粒数 Row grain number | 轴粗 Axle diameter | 百粒重 100-grain weight | 生育期 Growth period | 单株粒重 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗高Ear height | 0.561** | ||||||||||
穗长Ear length | -0.005 | -0.215 | |||||||||
秃尖长Bar tip length | -0.261 | 0.001 | -0.200 | ||||||||
穗粗Ear diameter | 0.075 | 0.080 | 0.165 | 0.071 | |||||||
穗行数Ear row number | -0.035 | 0.194 | -0.136 | 0.245 | 0.233 | ||||||
行粒数Row grain number | 0.360* | 0.043 | 0.574** | -0.332* | 0.403* | -0.031 | |||||
轴粗Axle diameter | -0.166 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.108 | 0.258 | 0.185 | 0.062 | ||||
百粒重100-grain weight | 0.250 | 0.065 | 0.476** | -0.170 | 0.546** | -0.035 | 0.685** | 0.455** | |||
生育期 Growth period | 0.022 | 0.733** | -0.250 | 0.010 | -0.389 | 0.494** | -0.506** | -0.409* | -0.811** | ||
单株粒重Grain weight per plant | 0.326* | 0.010 | 0.493** | -0.481** | 0.183 | -0.070 | 0.509** | -0.239 | 0.277 | 0.159 | |
茎秆抗推力 Thestem resists thrust | 0.388* | -0.047 | 0.237 | -0.402* | -0.075 | -0.388* | 0.387* | -0.176 | 0.195 | -0.182 | 0.490** |
Tab.2 Correlation analysis between yield traits and stem thrust resistance of different maize varieties
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 穗高 Ear height | 穗长 Ear length | 秃尖长 Bar tip length | 穗粗 Ear diameter | 穗行数 Ear row number | 行粒数 Row grain number | 轴粗 Axle diameter | 百粒重 100-grain weight | 生育期 Growth period | 单株粒重 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗高Ear height | 0.561** | ||||||||||
穗长Ear length | -0.005 | -0.215 | |||||||||
秃尖长Bar tip length | -0.261 | 0.001 | -0.200 | ||||||||
穗粗Ear diameter | 0.075 | 0.080 | 0.165 | 0.071 | |||||||
穗行数Ear row number | -0.035 | 0.194 | -0.136 | 0.245 | 0.233 | ||||||
行粒数Row grain number | 0.360* | 0.043 | 0.574** | -0.332* | 0.403* | -0.031 | |||||
轴粗Axle diameter | -0.166 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.108 | 0.258 | 0.185 | 0.062 | ||||
百粒重100-grain weight | 0.250 | 0.065 | 0.476** | -0.170 | 0.546** | -0.035 | 0.685** | 0.455** | |||
生育期 Growth period | 0.022 | 0.733** | -0.250 | 0.010 | -0.389 | 0.494** | -0.506** | -0.409* | -0.811** | ||
单株粒重Grain weight per plant | 0.326* | 0.010 | 0.493** | -0.481** | 0.183 | -0.070 | 0.509** | -0.239 | 0.277 | 0.159 | |
茎秆抗推力 Thestem resists thrust | 0.388* | -0.047 | 0.237 | -0.402* | -0.075 | -0.388* | 0.387* | -0.176 | 0.195 | -0.182 | 0.490** |
主成分 Principal component | 主成分1 Factor 1 | 主成分2 Factor 2 | 主成分3 Factor 3 | 主成分4 Factor 4 | 主成分5 Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.257 | 0.115 | -0.414 | 0.045 | 0.515 |
X2 | 0.126 | -0.582 | 0.074 | -0.215 | 0.446 |
X3 | 0.383 | -0.261 | 0.018 | -0.105 | 0.021 |
X4 | 0.318 | 0.175 | 0.121 | -0.628 | 0.152 |
X5 | 0.418 | 0.090 | 0.204 | 0.156 | -0.139 |
X6 | 0.443 | 0.017 | 0.149 | 0.061 | -0.135 |
X7 | 0.419 | -0.030 | 0.138 | 0.110 | -0.142 |
X8 | 0.324 | 0.191 | -0.184 | 0.266 | -0.255 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 3.95 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
百分率 Percent (%) | 49.40 | 14.24 | 10.97 | 8.47 | 6.90 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative percentage (%) | 49.40 | 63.64 | 74.61 | 83.08 | 89.98 |
Tab.3 Principal component load matrix of S7 generation hybrid combination
主成分 Principal component | 主成分1 Factor 1 | 主成分2 Factor 2 | 主成分3 Factor 3 | 主成分4 Factor 4 | 主成分5 Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.257 | 0.115 | -0.414 | 0.045 | 0.515 |
X2 | 0.126 | -0.582 | 0.074 | -0.215 | 0.446 |
X3 | 0.383 | -0.261 | 0.018 | -0.105 | 0.021 |
X4 | 0.318 | 0.175 | 0.121 | -0.628 | 0.152 |
X5 | 0.418 | 0.090 | 0.204 | 0.156 | -0.139 |
X6 | 0.443 | 0.017 | 0.149 | 0.061 | -0.135 |
X7 | 0.419 | -0.030 | 0.138 | 0.110 | -0.142 |
X8 | 0.324 | 0.191 | -0.184 | 0.266 | -0.255 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 3.95 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
百分率 Percent (%) | 49.40 | 14.24 | 10.97 | 8.47 | 6.90 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative percentage (%) | 49.40 | 63.64 | 74.61 | 83.08 | 89.98 |
No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | u(x1) | u(x2) | u(x3) | u(x4) | u(x5) | D值 | 综合评 价指数 Compreh- ensive evaluation index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1×S7-1 | -1.666 | 1.951 | 1.050 | -0.137 | 0.100 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 中 |
1×S7-2 | -2.456 | 0.564 | 0.770 | 1.551 | 0.625 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.52 | 弱 |
1×S7-3 | -2.519 | -1.023 | 1.596 | -0.308 | 0.270 | 0.94 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 中 |
1×S7-4 | -1.312 | 0.574 | 0.359 | 0.155 | 0.692 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 中 |
1×S7-5 | -1.894 | 0.429 | -0.602 | 0.586 | -0.138 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 弱 |
1×S7-6 | -4.055 | 0.360 | -1.888 | 0.149 | 0.178 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 弱 |
1×S7-7 | -1.325 | 0.321 | 0.496 | -0.008 | -0.432 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 中 |
1×S7-8 | -2.526 | 0.326 | 0.443 | 0.544 | 0.304 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 弱 |
1×S7-9 | -2.099 | 0.986 | 0.175 | -0.089 | 0.390 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 弱 |
2×S7-1 | -0.568 | 0.519 | -1.306 | 0.368 | 0.585 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 弱 |
2×S7-2 | 2.430 | 1.349 | 0.570 | -0.465 | 0.086 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 强 |
2×S7-3 | 2.192 | -1.790 | -1.428 | -1.040 | -0.111 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 中 |
2×S7-4 | 2.653 | -0.906 | -0.695 | 1.149 | -0.755 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 中 |
2×S7-5 | 1.437 | 2.514 | -1.282 | 0.711 | -0.701 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 中 |
2×S7-6 | -0.052 | -0.690 | -1.216 | 1.174 | -0.927 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 弱 |
2×S7-7 | 3.393 | 0.760 | 0.391 | -0.921 | -0.471 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 强 |
2×S7-8 | -0.769 | -0.377 | -0.672 | -0.423 | -0.255 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 弱 |
2×S7-9 | 2.765 | 0.943 | -0.223 | 1.078 | -0.154 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 强 |
3×S7-1 | -1.658 | -0.645 | 0.273 | -0.705 | -1.811 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 弱 |
3×S7-2 | 0.878 | 1.025 | 1.281 | 0.269 | -1.438 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 强 |
3×S7-3 | -0.042 | -1.150 | 0.926 | 0.773 | 0.285 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 中 |
3×S7-4 | 2.740 | -0.685 | 0.291 | 1.145 | -0.204 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-5 | 1.126 | 1.037 | 1.006 | -1.183 | -0.062 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 强 |
3×S7-6 | 1.580 | -2.195 | 0.888 | -0.969 | -0.389 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-7 | 1.382 | -0.507 | 0.317 | 0.561 | 0.317 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 强 |
3×S7-8 | 0.539 | -1.238 | 0.224 | 1.901 | 0.512 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 中 |
3×S7-9 | 3.318 | 0.556 | 1.235 | -0.202 | 1.396 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 强 |
4×S7-1 | 0.067 | -0.053 | -0.844 | -0.988 | 1.878 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 弱 |
4×S7-2 | 1.129 | 0.648 | -2.456 | -1.059 | 0.477 | 0.22 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 弱 |
4×S7-3 | -0.834 | 0.199 | -0.490 | -0.867 | -1.274 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 弱 |
4×S7-4 | 0.286 | -0.257 | 0.159 | -0.305 | -0.265 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-5 | 1.465 | -0.790 | 0.002 | -0.049 | 0.472 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-6 | -2.003 | -0.253 | 0.257 | -0.694 | 0.515 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 弱 |
4×S7-7 | 1.132 | -0.705 | -0.060 | -0.514 | 1.039 | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 中 |
4×S7-8 | -2.735 | -2.273 | -0.164 | -0.097 | -0.178 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 弱 |
4×S7-9 | -1.997 | 0.477 | 0.619 | -1.089 | -0.556 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 中 |
权重Weight | - | - | - | - | - | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - |
Tab.4 Principal componentanalysis scores and membership function values of hybrid combinations
No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | u(x1) | u(x2) | u(x3) | u(x4) | u(x5) | D值 | 综合评 价指数 Compreh- ensive evaluation index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1×S7-1 | -1.666 | 1.951 | 1.050 | -0.137 | 0.100 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 中 |
1×S7-2 | -2.456 | 0.564 | 0.770 | 1.551 | 0.625 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.52 | 弱 |
1×S7-3 | -2.519 | -1.023 | 1.596 | -0.308 | 0.270 | 0.94 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 中 |
1×S7-4 | -1.312 | 0.574 | 0.359 | 0.155 | 0.692 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 中 |
1×S7-5 | -1.894 | 0.429 | -0.602 | 0.586 | -0.138 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 弱 |
1×S7-6 | -4.055 | 0.360 | -1.888 | 0.149 | 0.178 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 弱 |
1×S7-7 | -1.325 | 0.321 | 0.496 | -0.008 | -0.432 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 中 |
1×S7-8 | -2.526 | 0.326 | 0.443 | 0.544 | 0.304 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 弱 |
1×S7-9 | -2.099 | 0.986 | 0.175 | -0.089 | 0.390 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 弱 |
2×S7-1 | -0.568 | 0.519 | -1.306 | 0.368 | 0.585 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 弱 |
2×S7-2 | 2.430 | 1.349 | 0.570 | -0.465 | 0.086 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 强 |
2×S7-3 | 2.192 | -1.790 | -1.428 | -1.040 | -0.111 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 中 |
2×S7-4 | 2.653 | -0.906 | -0.695 | 1.149 | -0.755 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 中 |
2×S7-5 | 1.437 | 2.514 | -1.282 | 0.711 | -0.701 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 中 |
2×S7-6 | -0.052 | -0.690 | -1.216 | 1.174 | -0.927 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 弱 |
2×S7-7 | 3.393 | 0.760 | 0.391 | -0.921 | -0.471 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 强 |
2×S7-8 | -0.769 | -0.377 | -0.672 | -0.423 | -0.255 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 弱 |
2×S7-9 | 2.765 | 0.943 | -0.223 | 1.078 | -0.154 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 强 |
3×S7-1 | -1.658 | -0.645 | 0.273 | -0.705 | -1.811 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 弱 |
3×S7-2 | 0.878 | 1.025 | 1.281 | 0.269 | -1.438 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 强 |
3×S7-3 | -0.042 | -1.150 | 0.926 | 0.773 | 0.285 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 中 |
3×S7-4 | 2.740 | -0.685 | 0.291 | 1.145 | -0.204 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-5 | 1.126 | 1.037 | 1.006 | -1.183 | -0.062 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 强 |
3×S7-6 | 1.580 | -2.195 | 0.888 | -0.969 | -0.389 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-7 | 1.382 | -0.507 | 0.317 | 0.561 | 0.317 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 强 |
3×S7-8 | 0.539 | -1.238 | 0.224 | 1.901 | 0.512 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 中 |
3×S7-9 | 3.318 | 0.556 | 1.235 | -0.202 | 1.396 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 强 |
4×S7-1 | 0.067 | -0.053 | -0.844 | -0.988 | 1.878 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 弱 |
4×S7-2 | 1.129 | 0.648 | -2.456 | -1.059 | 0.477 | 0.22 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 弱 |
4×S7-3 | -0.834 | 0.199 | -0.490 | -0.867 | -1.274 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 弱 |
4×S7-4 | 0.286 | -0.257 | 0.159 | -0.305 | -0.265 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-5 | 1.465 | -0.790 | 0.002 | -0.049 | 0.472 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-6 | -2.003 | -0.253 | 0.257 | -0.694 | 0.515 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 弱 |
4×S7-7 | 1.132 | -0.705 | -0.060 | -0.514 | 1.039 | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 中 |
4×S7-8 | -2.735 | -2.273 | -0.164 | -0.097 | -0.178 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 弱 |
4×S7-9 | -1.997 | 0.477 | 0.619 | -1.089 | -0.556 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 中 |
权重Weight | - | - | - | - | - | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - |
[1] | 赵久然, 王荣焕, 史洁慧, 等. 国内外玉米动态及展望[J]. 作物杂志, 2008,(5):5-9. |
ZHAO Jiuran, WANG Ronghuan, SHI Jiehui, et al. Corn trends and prospects at home and abroad[J]. Crops, 2008,(5):5-9. | |
[2] |
薛军, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 等. 玉米生长后期倒伏研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1845-1854.
DOI |
XUE Jun, WANG Keru, XIE Ruizhi, et al. Research progress on lodging in late growth stage of maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1845-1854.
DOI |
|
[3] |
王夏青, 宋伟, 张如养, 等. 玉米茎秆抗倒伏遗传的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学 2021, 54(11):2261-2272.
DOI |
WANG Xiaqing, SONG Wei, ZHANG Ruyang, et al. Research progress on lodging resistance inheritance of maize stalk[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2261-2272. | |
[4] | 胡建东, 鲍雅萍, 罗福和, 等. 作物茎秆抗倒伏强度测定技术研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2000, 34(1):77-80. |
HU Jiandong, BAO Yaping, LUO Fuhe, et al. Study on determination technology of lodging resistance of crop stems[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2000, 34(1): 77-80. | |
[5] | 王恒亮, 吴仁海, 朱昆, 等. 玉米倒伏成因与控制措施研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(10): 1-5. |
WANG Hengliang, WU Renhai, ZHU Kun, et al. Research progress on Causes and control measures of maize lodging[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 40(10): 1-5. | |
[6] | 汪黎明, 姚国旗, 穆春华, 等. 玉米抗倒性的遗传研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2011, 19(4): 1-4. |
WANG Liming, YAO Quoqi, MU Chunhua, et al. Genetic research progress of lodging resistance in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2011, 19(4): 1-4. | |
[7] | 靳英杰, 李鸿萍, 安盼盼, 等. 玉米抗倒性研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2): 94-98. |
JIN Yingjie, LI Hongping, AN Panpan, et al. Research progress on Lodging Resistance of maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(2): 94-98. | |
[8] | 勾玲, 赵明, 黄建军, 等. 玉米茎秆弯曲性能与抗倒能力的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(4): 653-661. |
GOU Ling, ZHAO Ming, HUANG Jianjun, et al. Study on bending property and lodging resistance of maize stalk[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34 (4): 653-661.
DOI URL |
|
[9] | Hu H X, Liu W X, Fu Z Y, et al. QTL mapping of stalk bending strength in a recombinant inbred line maize population[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2013, 126(9):2257-2266. |
[10] |
Li K, Yan J, Li J, et al. Genetic architecture of rind penetrometer resistance in two maize recombinant inbred line populations[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1): 152.
DOI URL |
[11] | 许莹莹, 马青美, 宋希云, 等. 不同玉米品种倒伏抗性与产量相关性状的聚类和相关分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(5):15-21. |
XU Yingying, MA Qingmei, SONG Xiyun, et al. Clustering and correlation analysis of lodging Resistance and yield related traits of different maize varieties[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(5): 15-21. | |
[12] | 王峥, 张宾, 李华伟. 2013 年倒伏对夏玉米产量影响试验报告[J]. 河南农业, 2016,(2):19-21. |
WANG Zheng, ZHANG Bin, LI Huawei. Experimental report on the impact of lodging on summer maize yield in 2013[J]. Agriculture of Henan, 2016,(2): 19-21. | |
[13] |
李树岩, 马玮, 彭记永, 等. 大喇叭口及灌浆期倒伏对夏玉米产量损失的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(19): 3952-3964.
DOI |
LI Shuyan, MA Wei, PENG Jiyong, et al. Study on yield loss of summer maize caused by large bell mouth and lodging during grain filling period[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19): 3952-3964.
DOI |
|
[14] | 曹庆军, 曹铁华, 杨粉团, 等. 灌浆期风灾倒伏对玉米子粒灌浆特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(9):1107-1113. |
CAO Qingjun, CAO Tiehua, YANG Fengtuan, et al. Effects of wind disaster lodging on Grain Filling Characteristics and quality of maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(9): 1107-1113. | |
[15] | 勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾, 等. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007,(33):1688-1695. |
GOU Ling, HUANG Jianjun, ZHANG Bin, et al. Effects of population density on lodging resistance and agronomic characters of maize stems[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007,(33):1688-1695. | |
[16] | 李永忠. 玉米茎秆和根系的研究概况[J]. 国外农学:玉米, 1990, 1(2) :5-9. |
LI Yongzhong. Research overview of maize stem and root system[J]. Foreign Agronomy: Maize, 1990, 1(2): 5-9. | |
[17] | 孙世贤, 戴俊英, 顾慰连. 氮、磷、钾肥对玉米倒伏及其产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(3) :28-33. |
SUN Shixian, DAI Junying, GU Weiliang. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on Maize lodging and yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1989, 22(3): 28-33. | |
[18] | 张芳魁, 霍仕平, 张健, 等. 玉米茎秆性状与抗折断力的相关和通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2006, 14(6) : 46-49. |
ZHANG Fankui, HUO Shiping, ZHANG Jian, et al. Correlation and path analysis between maize stem traits and breaking resistance[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2006, 14(6): 46-49. | |
[19] | Martin S A, Darrah L L, Hibbard B E. Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on Europe-an corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn[J]. Crop Science, 2004. |
[20] | 王雅楠, 鉴军帅, 贾凯. 等. 不同玉米品种青贮收获期茎秆抗倒力学特性比较分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(5):77-85, 92. |
WANG Yanan, JIAN Junshuai, JIA Kai, et al. Comparative analysis of stem lodging resistance of Different Maize Varieties during silage harvest[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(5): 77-85, 92. | |
[21] | 刘卫星, 王晨阳, 王强, 等. 不同玉米品种茎秆抗倒特性及其与产量的关系[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(7):17-21. |
LIU Weixin, WANG Chenyang, WANG Qiang, et al. Stem lodging resistance of different maize varieties and its relationship with yield[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 44(7): 17-21. | |
[22] | 郝玉波, 于洋, 钱春荣, 等. 不同熟期玉米品种茎秆抗倒伏特性研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020,(12):14-18. |
HAO Yubo, YU Yang, QIAN Chunrong, et al. Study on stem lodging resistance of maize varieties at different maturity[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(12): 14-18. | |
[23] | 杨青华, 冉午玲, 李蕾蕾, 等. 玉米茎秆性状与倒伏的相关性及通经分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50(2):167-170. |
YANG Qinghua, RAN Wuling, LI Leilei, et al. Correlation and general analysis of maize stem traits and lodging[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2016, 50(2): 167-170. | |
[24] | 赵仁全, 张启东, 蹇淑红, 等. 玉米抗倒能力的差异及倒伏对穗部性状的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2004,(3) : 20. |
ZHAO Renquan, ZHANG Qidong, JIAN Shuhong, et al. Differences in lodging resistance of maize and effects of lodging on ear traits[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2004,(3): 20. | |
[25] | 李雁, 肖植文, 伏成秀, 等. 云南28个玉米杂交组合主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(1): 34-40. |
LI Yan, XIAO Zhiwen, FU Chenxiu, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 28 maize hybrid combinations in Yunnan[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(1): 34-40. | |
[26] | 丁璐, 刘海学, 王聿双, 等. 26个玉米杂交组合农艺性状的相关性与主成分分[J/OL]. 分子植物育种:1-8[2019-12-11]. |
DING Lu, LIU Haixue, WANG Yushuang, et al. Correlation and principal component analysis of agronomic characters of 26 maize hybrids[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding: 1-8 [December 11, 2019]. | |
[27] | 李帅, 刘长华, 曹士亮, 等. 30个玉米杂交组合主要农艺性状鉴定与综合评价研究[J]. 黑龙江大学(自然科学学报), 2019, 36(6):703-712. |
LI Shuai, LIU Changhua, CAO Shiliang, et al. Identification and comprehensive evaluation of main agronomic characters of 30 maize hybrid combinations[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Heilongjiang University, 2019, 36(6): 703-712. | |
[28] | 王平, 徐加利, 闫保罗, 等. 基于主成分-聚类-逐步回归分析的夏玉米品种光温利用能力综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):71-77. |
WANG Ping, XU Giali, YAN Baoluo, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of light and temperature utilization capacity of summer maize varieties based on principal component cluster stepwise regression analysis[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(10): 71-77. |
[1] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, XU Qijiang, Sailihan Sai, LEI Junjie. Regulation of chlormequat on lodging resistance of winter wheat stem during the period of drip application of CCC [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878. |
[2] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[3] | ZHANG Jingcan, ZHANG Yongqiang, LEI Junjie, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, XU Wenxiu. Effects of different growth regulators on stem characteristics and lodging resistance of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1067-1074. |
[4] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[5] | YAO Qing, Aribelegan Hazzetti, YANG Minghua, LI Qiang, MIAO Haocui, CUI Hongliang. Response of quinoa seeds to germination temperature and identification of germination ability under low temperature stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149. |
[6] | LIU Min, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, GENG Wenjuan. Evaluation of cold resistance of three fresh edible jujube cultivars in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 916-924. |
[7] | GUO Yang, GUO Junxian, SHI Yong, LIU Li, FANG Wenyan, LIU Yancen. Prediction of SPAD Value in Melon Leaves by Characteristic Wavelength Screening Combined with PCA-LSSVM [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 616-623. |
[8] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[9] | CAO Yijie, SHI Zhiyong, Yusup Ablitip, Aisajan Mamat. Analysis of Amino Acid and Mineral Elements in the Rough-skinned Fruits of Korla Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 407-415. |
[10] | MA Hui, DAI Lu, LI Xingxing, Abuduaini Abuduweili, Aimaierjiang Abulitifu, TIAN Liwen, OU Huan. Analysis of the influence of different chemical treatments on the sealing effect of long staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608. |
[11] | Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, ZHANG Yanhong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, DU Xiaojing, WANG Fengbin, LYU Yuping, Amanguli Aizizi. Screening and evaluation of aromatic rice varieties with high quality and high yield in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703. |
[12] | LIU Ping, ZHANG Kai, MA Chao, ZHANG Hui, YANG Chuan. Evaluation of the comprehensive efficiency of cotton field with different phosphate fertilizer dosage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2521-2531. |
[13] | DOU Ziwei, YANG Lu, CHENG Ping, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Hong. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Nutritional Quality of Different Mulberry Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 127-139. |
[14] | YANG Minghua, WANG Qian, ZHOU Xinli, Aihemaitijiang Mahemuti, PEN Yuncheng, Aierjuma Tuluhan, Buayxam Namat, HOU Lili, LIU Qiang. Multiple Analysis on Character and Yield of Maize Hybrid Combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122. |
[15] | LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, SHU Sheng, HE Tao, JIN Yujie, MA Xinchao, DU Jiageng, ZHANG Jing. The Influence of Water and Fertilizer Coupling on the Growth-development and Quality of Sand Culture Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2158-2169. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||