Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2601-2608.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.001
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Hui1(), DAI Lu1, LI Xingxing1, Abuduaini Abuduweili1, Aimaierjiang Abulitifu1, TIAN Liwen2(), OU Huan1
Received:
2023-03-26
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-12-07
Correspondence author:
TIAN Liwen (1965-), male.Feidong county, Anhui province, professor, Research Direction: research and development of light, simple and efficient cotton production technology, (E-mail) 1365400936@qq.com
Supported by:
马辉1(), 戴路1, 李星星1, 阿布都艾尼·阿布都维力1, 艾麦尔江·阿布力提甫1, 田立文2(), 欧欢1
通讯作者:
田立文(1965-),男,安徽肥东人,研究员,研究方向为棉花轻简高效生产,(E-mail)1365400936@qq.com
作者简介:
马辉(1979-),女,新疆昌吉人,正高级农艺师,研究方向为棉花育种与栽培,(E-mail) 1543043221@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
MA Hui, DAI Lu, LI Xingxing, Abuduaini Abuduweili, Aimaierjiang Abulitifu, TIAN Liwen, OU Huan. Analysis of the influence of different chemical treatments on the sealing effect of long staple cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608.
马辉, 戴路, 李星星, 阿布都艾尼·阿布都维力, 艾麦尔江·阿布力提甫, 田立文, 欧欢. 不同化学药剂处理对长绒棉封顶效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.001
处理 Treatments | 化学封顶剂 Detopping reagent | 剂量 Dose | 成分 Components | 剂型 Formulation |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | “易顶” | 2 250 mL/hm2 | 25%氟节胺 | 悬浮剂 |
2 | “抑顶” | 1 800 mL/hm2 | 40%氟节胺 | 悬浮剂 |
3 | “向铃转” | 975 mL/hm2 | 250 g/L甲哌鎓 | 水剂 |
4 | “施益富” | 975 mL/hm2+ 975 mL/hm2(助剂) | 3%甲哌鎓+15%矮壮素+无 | 水剂+水剂 |
5 | “棉顶封” | 750 mL/hm2+ 750 mL/hm2(助剂) | 250 g/L甲哌鎓+ 乙氧基改性聚三硅氧烷 | 水剂+ 离子型高渗透剂 |
6 | “国光冠顶套餐” | 150 g/hm2+600 g/hm2 +15 g/hm2(助剂) | 5%烯效唑+250 g/L甲哌鎓 +92%油酸甲酯 | 可湿性粉剂+水剂+无 |
7 | 人工打顶 | 0 | 无 | 无 |
Tab.1 Chemical detopping reagent
处理 Treatments | 化学封顶剂 Detopping reagent | 剂量 Dose | 成分 Components | 剂型 Formulation |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | “易顶” | 2 250 mL/hm2 | 25%氟节胺 | 悬浮剂 |
2 | “抑顶” | 1 800 mL/hm2 | 40%氟节胺 | 悬浮剂 |
3 | “向铃转” | 975 mL/hm2 | 250 g/L甲哌鎓 | 水剂 |
4 | “施益富” | 975 mL/hm2+ 975 mL/hm2(助剂) | 3%甲哌鎓+15%矮壮素+无 | 水剂+水剂 |
5 | “棉顶封” | 750 mL/hm2+ 750 mL/hm2(助剂) | 250 g/L甲哌鎓+ 乙氧基改性聚三硅氧烷 | 水剂+ 离子型高渗透剂 |
6 | “国光冠顶套餐” | 150 g/hm2+600 g/hm2 +15 g/hm2(助剂) | 5%烯效唑+250 g/L甲哌鎓 +92%油酸甲酯 | 可湿性粉剂+水剂+无 |
7 | 人工打顶 | 0 | 无 | 无 |
处理 Treatments | 封顶前 1d株高 Plant height 1d pre- detopping (cm) | 封顶后 株高 Plant height post- detopping (cm) | 株高增长量 Plant height increment (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
“易顶” “ Yiding” | 132.7 | 148.8 | 16.1b |
“抑顶” “Yiding” | 127.7 | 153.6 | 25.9b |
“向铃转” “Xianglingzhuan” | 133.4 | 153.2 | 19.8b |
“施益富” “Shiyifu” | 138.0 | 158.2 | 20.2b |
“棉顶封” “Miandingfeng” | 121.6 | 162.5 | 40.9a |
“国光冠顶套餐” “Guoguang guandingtaocan” | 125.9 | 142.9 | 17.1b |
人工打顶 Manual topping | 137.2 | 140.3 | 3.1c |
Tab.2 Plant height of different treatments pre-and post-dotopping on cotton
处理 Treatments | 封顶前 1d株高 Plant height 1d pre- detopping (cm) | 封顶后 株高 Plant height post- detopping (cm) | 株高增长量 Plant height increment (cm) |
---|---|---|---|
“易顶” “ Yiding” | 132.7 | 148.8 | 16.1b |
“抑顶” “Yiding” | 127.7 | 153.6 | 25.9b |
“向铃转” “Xianglingzhuan” | 133.4 | 153.2 | 19.8b |
“施益富” “Shiyifu” | 138.0 | 158.2 | 20.2b |
“棉顶封” “Miandingfeng” | 121.6 | 162.5 | 40.9a |
“国光冠顶套餐” “Guoguang guandingtaocan” | 125.9 | 142.9 | 17.1b |
人工打顶 Manual topping | 137.2 | 140.3 | 3.1c |
处理 Treatments | 单株铃数 Bolls per plant (个) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
“易顶”“Yiding” | 9.5a | 3.09ab | 34.4a | 5 445.0a | 1 870.5a |
“抑顶” “Yiding” | 9.3a | 2.98ab | 33.2b | 5 031.0ab | 1 672.5ab |
“向铃转”“Xianglingzhuan” | 8.3abc | 3.04ab | 33.5ab | 4 806.0ab | 1 612.5b |
“施益富”“Shiyifu” | 7.7bc | 3.15a | 33.1b | 4 678.5b | 1 548.0b |
“棉顶封”“Miandingfeng” | 7.6bc | 3.10ab | 33.8ab | 4 509.0b | 1 522.5b |
“国光冠顶套餐”“Guoguang guandingtaocan” | 8.7ab | 2.92b | 33.7ab | 4 816.5ab | 1 621.5b |
人工打顶 Manual topping | 7.2c | 3.05ab | 33.3b | 4 636.5b | 1 543.5b |
Tab.3 Yield and yield components of different treatments on cotton
处理 Treatments | 单株铃数 Bolls per plant (个) | 铃重 Boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
“易顶”“Yiding” | 9.5a | 3.09ab | 34.4a | 5 445.0a | 1 870.5a |
“抑顶” “Yiding” | 9.3a | 2.98ab | 33.2b | 5 031.0ab | 1 672.5ab |
“向铃转”“Xianglingzhuan” | 8.3abc | 3.04ab | 33.5ab | 4 806.0ab | 1 612.5b |
“施益富”“Shiyifu” | 7.7bc | 3.15a | 33.1b | 4 678.5b | 1 548.0b |
“棉顶封”“Miandingfeng” | 7.6bc | 3.10ab | 33.8ab | 4 509.0b | 1 522.5b |
“国光冠顶套餐”“Guoguang guandingtaocan” | 8.7ab | 2.92b | 33.7ab | 4 816.5ab | 1 621.5b |
人工打顶 Manual topping | 7.2c | 3.05ab | 33.3b | 4 636.5b | 1 543.5b |
处理 Treatments | 上半部 平均长度 Length (mm) | 断裂比 强度 Strength (cN/tex) | 马克隆值 Micronaire value | 长度整齐 度指数 Length uniformity index |
---|---|---|---|---|
“易顶” “Yiding” | 38.05abc | 43.87a | 4.39a | 86.60a |
“抑顶” “Yiding” | 38.60ab | 43.97a | 4.19a | 87.83a |
“向铃转” “Xianglingzhuan” | 37.97abc | 43.97a | 4.32a | 87.27a |
“施益富” “Shiyifu” | 37.68abc | 44.10a | 4.08ab | 86.20a |
“棉顶封” “Miandingfeng” | 36.81c | 43.63a | 4.13ab | 86.60a |
“国光冠顶套餐” “Guoguang guandingtaocan” | 37.57bc | 45.43a | 4.17ab | 85.97a |
人工打顶 Manual topping | 39.14a | 43.45a | 3.76b | 87.25a |
Tab.4 Main fiber quality of different treatments on cotton
处理 Treatments | 上半部 平均长度 Length (mm) | 断裂比 强度 Strength (cN/tex) | 马克隆值 Micronaire value | 长度整齐 度指数 Length uniformity index |
---|---|---|---|---|
“易顶” “Yiding” | 38.05abc | 43.87a | 4.39a | 86.60a |
“抑顶” “Yiding” | 38.60ab | 43.97a | 4.19a | 87.83a |
“向铃转” “Xianglingzhuan” | 37.97abc | 43.97a | 4.32a | 87.27a |
“施益富” “Shiyifu” | 37.68abc | 44.10a | 4.08ab | 86.20a |
“棉顶封” “Miandingfeng” | 36.81c | 43.63a | 4.13ab | 86.60a |
“国光冠顶套餐” “Guoguang guandingtaocan” | 37.57bc | 45.43a | 4.17ab | 85.97a |
人工打顶 Manual topping | 39.14a | 43.45a | 3.76b | 87.25a |
性状 Characters | 权重Weight |
---|---|
株高增长量 Plant height increment | 0.054 5 |
单株果枝数Number of fruit branches per plant | 0.091 6 |
单株铃数 Bolls per plant | 0.089 4 |
铃重 Boll weight | 0.062 8 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.114 5 |
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield | 0.104 4 |
皮棉产量 Lint yield | 0.146 2 |
上半部平均长度 Length | 0.064 8 |
断裂比强度Strength | 0.120 2 |
马克隆值 Micronaire value | 0.063 0 |
长度整齐度指数 Length uniformity index | 0.088 7 |
Tab.5 Entropy weight of different evaluation indexes on cotton
性状 Characters | 权重Weight |
---|---|
株高增长量 Plant height increment | 0.054 5 |
单株果枝数Number of fruit branches per plant | 0.091 6 |
单株铃数 Bolls per plant | 0.089 4 |
铃重 Boll weight | 0.062 8 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.114 5 |
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield | 0.104 4 |
皮棉产量 Lint yield | 0.146 2 |
上半部平均长度 Length | 0.064 8 |
断裂比强度Strength | 0.120 2 |
马克隆值 Micronaire value | 0.063 0 |
长度整齐度指数 Length uniformity index | 0.088 7 |
处理 Treatments | “易顶” “Yiding” | “抑顶” “Yiding” | “向铃转” “Xiangling zhuan” | “施益富” “Shiyifu” | “棉顶封” “Mian ding feng” | “国光冠顶套餐” “Guoguang guanding taocan” | 人工打顶 Manual topping |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高增长量Plant height increment | 0.035 6 | 0.021 6 | 0.030 4 | 0.029 8 | 0.000 0 | 0.034 3 | 0.054 5 |
单株果枝数Number of fruit branches per plant | 0.091 6 | 0.040 7 | 0.030 5 | 0.020 3 | 0.015 3 | 0.056 0 | 0.000 0 |
单株铃数Bolls per plant | 0.089 4 | 0.081 6 | 0.042 8 | 0.019 4 | 0.015 5 | 0.058 3 | 0.000 0 |
铃重 Boll weight | 0.046 4 | 0.016 4 | 0.032 7 | 0.062 8 | 0.049 1 | 0.000 0 | 0.035 5 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.114 5 | 0.008 8 | 0.035 2 | 0.000 0 | 0.061 7 | 0.052 9 | 0.017 6 |
籽棉产量Seed cotton yield | 0.104 4 | 0.058 2 | 0.033 1 | 0.018 9 | 0.000 0 | 0.034 3 | 0.014 2 |
皮棉产量Lint yield | 0.146 2 | 0.063 0 | 0.037 8 | 0.010 7 | 0.000 0 | 0.041 6 | 0.008 8 |
上半部平均长度Length | 0.034 5 | 0.049 8 | 0.032 3 | 0.024 2 | 0.000 0 | 0.021 1 | 0.064 8 |
断裂比强度Strength | 0.025 5 | 0.031 6 | 0.031 6 | 0.039 5 | 0.010 9 | 0.120 2 | 0.000 0 |
马克隆值Micronaire value | 0.000 0 | 0.040 7 | 0.014 2 | 0.063 0 | 0.052 9 | 0.044 7 | 0.050 8 |
长度整齐度指数Length uniformity index | 0.030 0 | 0.088 7 | 0.062 0 | 0.011 0 | 0.030 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.061 0 |
综合指数Complex index | 0.718 1 | 0.501 0 | 0.382 6 | 0.299 6 | 0.235 4 | 0.463 4 | 0.307 3 |
排序Order | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
Tab.6 Fuzzy comprehensive index of different treatments on cotton
处理 Treatments | “易顶” “Yiding” | “抑顶” “Yiding” | “向铃转” “Xiangling zhuan” | “施益富” “Shiyifu” | “棉顶封” “Mian ding feng” | “国光冠顶套餐” “Guoguang guanding taocan” | 人工打顶 Manual topping |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高增长量Plant height increment | 0.035 6 | 0.021 6 | 0.030 4 | 0.029 8 | 0.000 0 | 0.034 3 | 0.054 5 |
单株果枝数Number of fruit branches per plant | 0.091 6 | 0.040 7 | 0.030 5 | 0.020 3 | 0.015 3 | 0.056 0 | 0.000 0 |
单株铃数Bolls per plant | 0.089 4 | 0.081 6 | 0.042 8 | 0.019 4 | 0.015 5 | 0.058 3 | 0.000 0 |
铃重 Boll weight | 0.046 4 | 0.016 4 | 0.032 7 | 0.062 8 | 0.049 1 | 0.000 0 | 0.035 5 |
衣分Lint percentage | 0.114 5 | 0.008 8 | 0.035 2 | 0.000 0 | 0.061 7 | 0.052 9 | 0.017 6 |
籽棉产量Seed cotton yield | 0.104 4 | 0.058 2 | 0.033 1 | 0.018 9 | 0.000 0 | 0.034 3 | 0.014 2 |
皮棉产量Lint yield | 0.146 2 | 0.063 0 | 0.037 8 | 0.010 7 | 0.000 0 | 0.041 6 | 0.008 8 |
上半部平均长度Length | 0.034 5 | 0.049 8 | 0.032 3 | 0.024 2 | 0.000 0 | 0.021 1 | 0.064 8 |
断裂比强度Strength | 0.025 5 | 0.031 6 | 0.031 6 | 0.039 5 | 0.010 9 | 0.120 2 | 0.000 0 |
马克隆值Micronaire value | 0.000 0 | 0.040 7 | 0.014 2 | 0.063 0 | 0.052 9 | 0.044 7 | 0.050 8 |
长度整齐度指数Length uniformity index | 0.030 0 | 0.088 7 | 0.062 0 | 0.011 0 | 0.030 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.061 0 |
综合指数Complex index | 0.718 1 | 0.501 0 | 0.382 6 | 0.299 6 | 0.235 4 | 0.463 4 | 0.307 3 |
排序Order | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 5 |
处理 Treatments | “易顶” “Yiding” | “抑顶” “Yiding” | “向铃转” “Xiangling zhuan” | “施益富” “Shiyifu” | “棉顶封” “Mian ding feng” | “国光冠顶 套餐” “Guoguang guanding taocan” | 人工打顶 Manual topping |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
化学封顶剂成本 Detopping cost | 360 | 450 | 525 | 300 | 240 | 240 | 600 |
无人机作业成本 UAV operation cost | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | - |
节省成本 Cost saving | 165 | 75 | 0 | 225 | 285 | 285 | - |
Tab.7
处理 Treatments | “易顶” “Yiding” | “抑顶” “Yiding” | “向铃转” “Xiangling zhuan” | “施益富” “Shiyifu” | “棉顶封” “Mian ding feng” | “国光冠顶 套餐” “Guoguang guanding taocan” | 人工打顶 Manual topping |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
化学封顶剂成本 Detopping cost | 360 | 450 | 525 | 300 | 240 | 240 | 600 |
无人机作业成本 UAV operation cost | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | 75 | - |
节省成本 Cost saving | 165 | 75 | 0 | 225 | 285 | 285 | - |
[1] | 叶春秀, 王刚, 李有忠, 等. 不同化学打顶剂对北疆早熟陆地棉农艺及经济性状的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(4):762-766. |
YE Chunxiu, WANG Gang, LI Youzhong, et al. Effects of Different Chemical Topping Agents on Agronomic Characters and Yield of Early Maturing Upland Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum) in Northern Xinjiang Province[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(4):762-766. | |
[2] | 王香茹, 张恒恒, 庞念厂, 等. 新疆棉区棉花化学打顶剂的筛选研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(3):7-12,31. |
WANG Xiangru, ZHANG Hengheng, PANG Nianchang, et al. Screening for Suitable Cotton Topping Chemicals in the Xinjiang Region[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(3):7-12,31. | |
[3] | 赵强, 周春江, 张巨松, 等. 化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺和经济性状的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(4):329-333. |
ZHAO Qiang, ZHOU Chunjiang, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Effect of Chemical Detopping on the Canopy and Yield of Cotton(Gossypium hirsutum) in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(4):329-333. | |
[4] |
祝令晓, 刘连涛, 张永江, 等. 化学封顶对棉花株型的调控及评价指标筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(20):4152-4163.
DOI |
ZHU Lingxiao, LIU Liantao、 ZHANG Yongjiang, et al. The Regulation and Evaluation Indexes Screening of Chemical Topping on Cotton’s Plant Architecture[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(20):4152-4163.
DOI |
|
[5] | 娄善伟, 康正华, 赵强, 等. 化学封顶高产棉花株型研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7):1328-1333. |
LOU Shanwei, KANG Zhenghua, ZHAO Qiang, et al. Study on Plant Type of High Yield Cotton after Chemical Detopping[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7):1,328-1,333. | |
[6] | 李新裕, 陈玉娟. 新疆垦区长绒棉化学封顶取代人工打顶试验研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2001, 28(1):11-12. |
LI Xinyu, CHEN Yujuan. Experimental Study of Long-Fiber Cotton on Chemical Detopping Replacing Artificial Detoping in Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2001, 28(1):11-12. | |
[7] | 戴翠荣, 赵晓雁, 余力, 等. 氟节胺化学打顶对南疆棉花农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(8):1394-1398. |
DAI Cuirong, ZHAO Xiaoyan, YU Li, et al. Effect of Chemical Topping with Flumetralin on the Canopy and Yield of Cotton in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(8):1394-1398. | |
[8] | 孙国军, 李克富, 彭延. 南疆棉区棉花利用氟节胺打顶技术试验[J]. 棉花科学, 2014, 36(2):23-25. |
SUN Guojun, LI Kefu, PENG Yan. Test of Topping Technology by Using Flumetralin in Southern Xinjiang Cotton Region[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2014, 36(2):23-25. | |
[9] | 马辉, 张明, 戴路, 等. 基于投影寻踪法综合评价棉花不同化学打顶剂效果[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(6):5-10. |
MA Hui, ZHANG Ming, DAI Lu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the effects of different chemical topping agents on cotton basedon the projection pursuit method[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(6):5-10. | |
[10] | 康正华, 赵强, 娄善伟, 等. 不同化学打顶剂对棉花农艺及产量性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7):1200-1208. |
KANG Zhenghua, ZHAO Qiang, LOU Shanwei, et al. Effects on the Agronomic and Economic Characters of Cotton by Applying Different Topping Chemicals[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7):1200-1208. | |
[11] | 曹飞, 练文明, 吴博, 等. 南疆棉区4 种化学打顶剂应用效果的研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(6):72-77. |
CAO Fei, LIAN Wenming, WU Bo, et al. Research on the Application Effect of 4 Chemical Detopping in the Cotton Region of the Southern Xinjiang[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(6):72-77. |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | WANG Ping, KONG Na, PAN Yan, SUN Xiping, XU Bin, ZHANG Ting. Effects of chlorine dioxide fumigation treatments on the storage of fresh walnuts [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1940-1949. |
[3] | SONG Danbo, ZHANG Guoxin, WANG Quan, LIU Baojun, HUANG Tao, HAN Hongwei, BAI Jianyu, GUO Qingyuan. Study on the biological characteristics of the pathogen of bacterial perforation of alternaria alternata in Xinjiang and the screening of laboratory agents [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1515-1522. |
[4] | LIU Xukun, Aerziguli Rouzi, ZHU Xiaofeng, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, ZHAO Wenhui, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Adili Shataer, GUO Wenchao. The control effect of three kinds of fan devices on (Carposina sasakii Matsmura) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 3041-3048. |
[5] | JIANG Congjun, Alifu Aierxi, LIN Tao, SHA Hong, ZHENG Zipiao, Nuermanguli Wupuer, JIANG Zhengjun, CUI Jianping, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na. Effects of defoliants on defoliation, yield and quality of machine-picked cotton in different planting modes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2661-2666. |
[6] | WU Lili, QIAN Tao, CHEN Yan, Wumaierjiang Baikeli, LI Guangkuo, DING Ruifeng. Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797. |
[7] | XU Yanjun, LIAN Weijia, LIU Xiangyu, Slayidin Smayi, TANG Qiuju, Ernival Abdulah. Effects of Water - Nitrogen Coupling on Soil Water Distribution and Yield in Cotton Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1051-1059. |
[8] | TAN Yixi, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, Tursun Ahemat, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of Trap Colour, Hanging Height and Position on the Effectiveness of Trapping Tuta absoluta(meyrick) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1144-1155. |
[9] | FU Kaiyun, LI Aimei, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Ahmat Tuerxun, FENG Hongzu, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of 10 Kinds of Insecticides on the Control Effect of Tomato Leaf Miner [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172. |
[10] | HE Wei, LUO Wenfang, YU Zhenhua, XU Jianjun, SUN Xiaojun. Growth Promoting Effect and Safety Evaluation of Bacillus velezensis JTB8-2 on Processed Tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1260-1269. |
[11] | MA Yongjie, WANG Xingyi, HAN Congying, LIN Yuhong, MA Hui, ZHANG Xueyan. Evaluation of the Effect of Self-propelled Atomizing Cooling Machine for the Back Wall in Sunlight Greenhouse [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 1016-1024. |
[12] | SHI Lei, LÜ Ning, HE Shuai, YIN Feihu, GAO Zhijian, TAN Rongxin. Screening of the Water Drainage and Salt Control Mode of Subsurface Pipe and Shaft on the Secondary Salinization Soil and Its Effect Evaluation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(3): 716-724. |
[13] | ZHANG Donghai, WEI Junmei, CHEN Bing, JI Guangpeng, WANG Fan, NIU Linglei. Evaluation on Effects of Herbicide Sprayed on Cotton Fields before Sowing by UAV [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 3022-3029. |
[14] | CUI Jinxin, LU Xiaoshuang, LI Shengmei, YANG Tao, PANG Bo, WANG Honggang, GAO Wenwei. Defoliant on Cotton Defoliation Effect and Its Influence on the Yield of Different Position Fruit Branches [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2384-2393. |
[15] | LU Yanhong, HAO Jinhui, ZHAN Faqiang, WANG Ning, HOU Xinqiang, YANG Rong, BAO Huifang, LONG Xuanqi. Isolation of Pathogenic Bacteria and Screening and Identification of Antagonistic Bacteria of Black Spot of Fragrant pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2538-2545. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||