喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落多样性及其测度指标

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.05.001

新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (5): 785-796.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.05.001

• 园艺·林业·生理生化 • 下一篇

喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落多样性及其测度指标

邹卓颖¹, 潘存德¹, 李贵华², 余戈壁³, 张帆¹, 刘博¹, 郭珂¹

1.新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院/新疆教育厅干旱区林业生态与产业技术重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830052;
2.新疆维吾尔自治区林业厅,乌鲁木齐830000;
3.喀纳斯国家自然保护区,新疆布尔津 836600

收稿日期:2019-01-30 发布日期:2019-05-20
通信作者: 潘存德(1964-),男,新疆奇台人,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为森林生态与经营, (E-mail)pancunde@163.com
作者简介:邹卓颖(1993-),女,重庆人,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林培育学,(E-mail)864082966@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31570634);自治区财政林业科技项目“新疆山地森林更新演替与可持续经营研究”(新林科字〔2016〕599号-30)

The Community Diversity in Pyrogenic Succession of Kanas Taiga and Its Measure Indices

ZOU Zhuo-ying¹, PAN Cun-de¹, LI Gui-hua², YU Ge-bi³, ZHANG Fan¹, LIU Bo¹, GUO Ke¹

1. Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecology and Industry Technology in Arid Region, Education Department of Xinjiang / College of Forestry and Horticulture,Xinjiang Agricultural University , Urumqi 830052, China;
2. Forestry Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi 830000, China;
3. Kanas National Nature Reserve, Burqin Xinjiang 836600, China

Received:2019-01-30 Published:2019-05-20
Correspondence author: PAN Cun-de( 1964-),male, native place: Xinjiang, professor, Research field: forest ecosystem management,( E-mail)pancunde@ 163.com
Supported by:
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China ( 31570634) ; the Financial Forestry Science and Technology Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region ( XLKZ [2016] No.599-30)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】比较分析以多度、盖度和重要值作为测度指标对群落多样性测度指数值的影响,研究适用于泰加林火成演替群落多样性分析的测度指标和测度指数。【方法】以新疆喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落为研究对象,调查8种群落类型的383个典型样方数据,分别以多度、盖度和重要值作为测度指标,选取测度群落物种丰富度、多样性、优势度和均匀度的11个指数进行分析。【结果】以重要值作为测度指标,8种群落类型的同类型物种丰富度指数值、多样性指数值、优势度指数值和均匀度指数值变化趋势相同或相近;物种均匀度对群落物种多样性的影响大于物种丰富度;Patrick 丰富度指数、Shannon多样性指数和Simpson优势度指数对物种丰富度的敏感性较其它同类型指数高;McIntosh均匀度指数对物种丰富度的敏感性较其它同类型指数低。【结论】可以重要值作为喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落的多样性测度指标,以Patrick 丰富度指数、Shannon多样性指数、Simpson优势度指数和McIntosh均匀度指数作为群落多样性的测度指数。物种均匀度对喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落物种多样性指数值的贡献要大于物种丰富度。

关键词: 泰加林; 火成演替; 群落; 物种多样性; 测度指标

Abstract: 【Objective】 The purpose of this paper is to study the measurement indicators and indices for the community diversity analysis of pyrogenic succession in taiga by comparing the influence of abundance, coverage and important value on the community diversity indices. 【Methods】 This project chose eleven measuring indices measuring the community species abundance, species diversity, species dominance and species evenness of community to analyze pyrogenic succession communities of Kanas taiga in Xinjiang by taking the abundance, cover and important value as the measuring indicators. The eleven indices were analyzed by using investigation data of 383 typical sample plots of 8 community types. 【Results】 The variation trends of homogeneous species abundance indices, diversity indices, dominance indices and evenness indices about 8 community were the same or similar by taking the important value as the measuring indicator. For community diversity, the effect of species evenness was stronger than that of species abundance. In terms of species abundance, the sensitivity of Patrick abundance index, Shannon diversity index and Simpson dominance index was higher than that of the same type indices. But McIntosh evenness index was lower than the same type indices.【Conclusion】 In the process of studying the pyrogenic succession community diversity of Kanas taiga, the important value, Patrick abundance index, Shannon diversity index, Simpson dominance index and McIntosh evenness index can be used as a measure indices. The contribution of species evenness to the species diversity index of pyrogenic succession community in Kanas taiga is greater than that of species abundance

Key words: taiga; pyrogenic succession; community; species diversity; measure index

中图分类号:

S754

邹卓颖, 潘存德, 李贵华, 余戈壁, 张帆, 刘博, 郭珂. 喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落多样性及其测度指标[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(5): 785-796.

ZOU Zhuo-ying, PAN Cun-de, LI Gui-hua, YU Ge-bi, ZHANG Fan, LIU Bo, GUO Ke. The Community Diversity in Pyrogenic Succession of Kanas Taiga and Its Measure Indices[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(5): 785-796.

参考文献 28

[1]	Cardinale, B. J. , Duffy, J. E. , Gonzalez, A. , Hooper, D. U. , Perrings, C. , & Venail, P. , et al. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401): 59-67.
[2]	Hurlbert, S. H. (1971). The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology, 52(4): 577-586.
[3]	陈灵芝. 中国的生物多样性[M]. 北京:科学出版社,1993:112-156.CHEN Ling-zhi. (1993). China's Biological Diversity [M]. Beijing: Science Publishing House: 112-156.(in Chinese)
[4]	刘翠玲,潘存德,吴晓勇,等. 新疆喀纳斯旅游区树种多样性垂直格局与自然火干扰[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(8):4 157- 4 162.LIU Cui-ling,PAN Cun-de,WU Xiao-yong,et al.(2009). Altitudinal pattern of species richness of tree and effect of natural fire disturbance in Kanas Tourism District, Xinjiang [J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 29(8):4,157- 4,162.(in Chinese)
[5]	Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21(2-3): 213-251.
[6]	Pielou, E. C., & Levandowsky, M. (1975). Ecological diversity. Quarterly Review of Biology.
[7]	黄忠良,孔国辉,何道泉. 鼎湖山植物群落多样性的研究[J]. 生态学报,2000,20(2):193-198.HUANG Zhong-liang,KONG Guo-hui,HE Dao-quan.(2000). Plant community diversity in Dinghushan Nature Reserve [J]. Acta Ecological Sinica, 20(2):193-198.(in Chinese)
[8]	张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2004: 89-90.ZHANG Jin-tun.(2004). Quantitative Ecology [M]. Beijing: Science Publishing House: 89-90.(in Chinese)
[9]	Grubb, P.J. (1997). The maintenance of species‐richness in plant communities: the importance of the regeneration niche. Biological Reviews, 52(4): 107-145.
[10]	Pielou,E.C.(1966). Species-diversity and pattern-diversity in the study of ecological succession. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 10(2):370-383.
[11]	Whittaker,R.H.(1965). Dominance and diversity in land plant communities: numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution. Science,147:250-260.
[12]	Porter,J.W.(1972). Patterns of species?diversity in Caribbean reef corals. Ecology,5(1):52-76.
[13]	马克平,黄建辉,于顺利,等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅱ丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J]. 生态学报,1995,15(3):268-277.MA Ke-ping, HUANG Jian-hui,YU Shun-li,et al.(1995). Plant community diversity in Dongling mountain,Beijing,China:Ⅱ. species richness, evenness and species diversities[J]. Acta Ecological Sinica,15(3):268-277.(in Chinese).
[14]	张林静,岳明,赵桂仿,等. 新疆阜康地区植物群落物种多样性及其测度指标的比较[J]. 西北植物学报,2002,22(2):142- 150.ZHANG Lin-jing,YUE Ming,ZHAO Gui-fang,et al.(2002). Plant community species diversity on oasis-desert ecotone in Fukang of Xinjiang and comparison of its measurement [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 22(2):142-150.(in Chinese)
[15]	晋瑜,潘存德,王梅,等. 荒漠植物群落物种多样性及其测度指标比较[J]. 干旱区地理,2005,28(1):113-119.JIN Yu,PAN Cun-de,WANG Mei,et al.(2005). Plant community species diversity and comparison of its Indices in arid desert land [J]. Arid Land Geography,28(1):113-119.(in Chinese)
[16]	马淑琴,薛正伟,杨丽丽,等. 塔里木荒漠河岸林异质生境物种多样性比较与其测度指标筛选及评价[J]. 植物研究,2017, 37(6):961-969.MA Shu-qin,XUE Zheng-wei,YANG Li-li,et al.(2017). Comparison of species diversity under heterogeneous habitats, determination and evaluation of diversity indices of desert riparian forest community in Tarim Basin [J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research,37(6): 961-969.(in Chinese)
[17]	Patrick, R. , & Strawbridge, D. (1963). Variation in the structure of natural diatom communities. The American Naturalist,97(892): 51-57.
[18]	Clifford,H.T.,Stephenson,W.(1975). An Introduction to Numerical Classification[M]. London:Academic Press:65-89.
[19]	Magurran,A.E.(1988). Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement [M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press:26-32.
[20]	Simpson, E. H. (1972). Measurement of diversity. Journal of Cardiothoracic & Vascular Anesthesia, 27(2): 261.
[21]	Berger, W. H., & Parker, F. L. (1970). Diversity of planktonic foraminifera in deep-sea sediments. Science, 168(3937): 1,345-1,347.
[22]	Pielou, E. C. (2011). An introduction to mathematical ecology. Bioscience, 24(2):7-12.
[23]	陈梦,刘恩斌. 生物多样性熵值测度指标的应用与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2005,29(1):37-40.CHEN Meng,LIU En-bin.(2005). Analyses on assessment index of biodiversity [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Ed.), 29(1):37-40.(in Chinese)
[24]	陈廷贵,张金屯. 十五个物种多样性指数的比较研究[J]. 河南科学,1999,17(1):62-64.CHEN Ting-gui,ZHANG Jin-tun.(2017). A comparison of fifteen species diversity indices [J]. Henan Science, 17(1):62-64.(in Chinese)
[25]	许晴,张放,许中旗,等. Simpson指数和Shannon-Wiener指数若干特征的分析及"稀释效应"[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(4): 527-531.XU Qing,ZHANG Fang,XU Zhong-qi,et al.(2011). Some characteristics of Simpson index and the Shannon-Wiener index and their dilution effect [J]. Pratacultural Science, 28(4):527-531.(in Chinese)
[26]	吴昊. 不同类型群落物种多样性指数的比较研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2015,35(5):84-89.WU Hao.(2015). Comparative study of species diversity index of different types communities [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 35(5):84-89.(in Chinese)
[27]	彭少麟,王伯荪. 鼎湖山森林群落分析Ⅰ.物种多样性[J]. 生态科学,1983,1(1):11-17.PENG Shao-lin,WANG Bo-sun.(1983). Analysis on the forest community of Dinghushan I.species diversity [J]. Ecological science, 1(1):11-17. (in Chinese)
[28]	李新荣. 莫斯科州针阔混交林带森林群落的灌木层结构分析[J]. 植物学通报,1997, 14(S1):40-48.LI Xin-rong.(1997). Analysis community of shrub layer in different communities in the spruce-broad-leaved mixed geobotanical zone of Moscow state [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 14(S1):40-48.(in Chinese)

喀纳斯泰加林火成演替群落多样性及其测度指标

The Community Diversity in Pyrogenic Succession of Kanas Taiga and Its Measure Indices

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 28

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李凯亮, 张振宇, 胡红英. 新疆哈密地区枣园昆虫群落结构及多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2028-2037.
[2]	费诚, 董乙强, 安沙舟. 新疆北疆荒漠群落组成及种间联结与相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2055-2065.
[3]	陈乙煌, 邢利, 东珍珍, 马小梅, 黄建军, 罗晓霞. 柽柳根际土壤放线菌的分离及拮抗活性筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1790-1797.
[4]	田敬宇, 高雁, 高兴旺, 曾军, 赵鹏安, 苏比努尔·居来提. 哈密瓜种植对根际土壤细菌群落组成和多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1253-1262.
[5]	张鲜花, 李江艳, 吴咏梅, 朱进忠. 镰芒针茅、博洛特绢蒿草地群落年际动态[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(7): 1802-1807.
[6]	张鲜花, 李江艳, 吴咏梅, 朱进忠. 天山北坡中段山地紫花鸢尾草甸植物群落动态分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1522-1529.
[7]	李海强, 王冬梅, 刘建. 核棉间作对棉田节肢动物群落结构及自然天敌种群发生的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(4): 934-941.
[8]	朱晓锋, 蔡淑琳, 苏卓文, 张殿朋, 宋博, 徐兵强, 阿布都克尤木·卡德尔, 杨森. 果园脐腹小蠹伴生(共生)真菌群落组成及功能分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 691-699.
[9]	买尔旦·艾斯卡尔, 吾玛尔·阿布力孜, 牙克甫·艾散江, 阿丽亚·司地克. 吐鲁番火焰山南麓农田生态区土壤螨类群落多样性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(3): 744-758.
[10]	郭晓雯, 杜思垚, 王芳霞, 叶扬, 杨茂琪, 闵伟. 长期咸水滴灌对棉田土壤细菌和真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 2909-2923.
[11]	木拉提江·夏地买买提, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪, 阿马努拉·依明尼亚孜. 坡向和海拔对乌孙山草地植物群落特征及物种多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2724-2733.
[12]	艾海白尔·卡斯木, 樊永红, 迪拉热·海米提. 盐碱地白刺不同部位微生物群落高通量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2562-2573.
[13]	葛瑶, 王振锡. 天山云杉林不同林型物种多样性对土壤因子的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 134-144.
[14]	何伟, 罗文芳, 于镇华, 许建军, 孙晓军. 高温闷棚对设施蔬菜根结线虫的防治效果及土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 179-189.
[15]	吕文钧, 吐尔逊娜依·热依木, 雪热提江·麦提努日, 张青青. 游牧与定居放牧下山地草甸草地植物群落特征分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1): 231-241.