Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (1): 202-209.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.01.023
• Plant Protection·Horticultural Special Local Products • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Wei1(), ZHANG Renfu1, LIU Haiyang1, LI Xiaowei2, YAO Ju1(
)
Received:
2024-07-08
Online:
2025-01-20
Published:
2025-03-11
Correspondence author:
YAO Ju
Supported by:
王伟1(), 张仁福1, 刘海洋1, 李晓维2, 姚举1(
)
通讯作者:
姚举
作者简介:
王伟(1982-),男,天津人,研究员,博士,研究方向为棉花有害生物防治,(E-mail)wlzforever2004@sina.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Wei, ZHANG Renfu, LIU Haiyang, LI Xiaowei, YAO Ju. Occurrence dynamics and spatial distribution pattern of Frankliniella intonsa in cotton fields in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 202-209.
王伟, 张仁福, 刘海洋, 李晓维, 姚举. 新疆棉田花蓟马消长规律及空间分布[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(1): 202-209.
指标 Indexes | 计算公式 Calculation formula | 备注 Remarks |
---|---|---|
扩散系数(C) Diffusion coefficient (C) | C = S2/ m | C < 1时,均匀分布; C = 1时,随机分布;C > 1时,聚集分布。 |
丛生指标(I) Cluster index (I) | I = S2 / m - 1 | I < 0时,均匀分布;I = 0时,随机分布;I > 0时,聚集分布 |
负二项分布参数(k) Negative binomial parameter (k) | k = m2 / (S2 -m) | 8 > k > 0时,聚集分布;k < 0时,均匀分布;8< k → ∞时,随机分布. |
Cassie指标(CA) Cassie index (CA) | CA = (S2/ m -1) / m | CA < 0时,均匀分布;CA = 0时,随机分布;CA > 0时,聚集分布。 |
平均拥挤度(m*) Average congestion degree (m*) | m*= m + (S2 -m) / m | m* < 1时,均匀分布;m* = 1时,随机分布;m* > 1时,聚集分布。 |
聚块指标(PI) Agglomeration index (PI) | m* / m | PI < 1时,均匀分布;PI = 1时,随机分布;当PI > 1时,聚集分布 |
Taylor幂法则 Taylor model | lgS2=lga+ blgm | lga= 0、b = 0时,随机分布;lga > 0、b = 1时,聚集分布,但聚集度不依赖于密度;lga> 0、b > 1时,聚集分布,聚集度依赖于密度;lga> 0、b < 1时,均匀分布,种群密度越高越均匀。 |
Tab.1 Methods for assessing population spatial distribution
指标 Indexes | 计算公式 Calculation formula | 备注 Remarks |
---|---|---|
扩散系数(C) Diffusion coefficient (C) | C = S2/ m | C < 1时,均匀分布; C = 1时,随机分布;C > 1时,聚集分布。 |
丛生指标(I) Cluster index (I) | I = S2 / m - 1 | I < 0时,均匀分布;I = 0时,随机分布;I > 0时,聚集分布 |
负二项分布参数(k) Negative binomial parameter (k) | k = m2 / (S2 -m) | 8 > k > 0时,聚集分布;k < 0时,均匀分布;8< k → ∞时,随机分布. |
Cassie指标(CA) Cassie index (CA) | CA = (S2/ m -1) / m | CA < 0时,均匀分布;CA = 0时,随机分布;CA > 0时,聚集分布。 |
平均拥挤度(m*) Average congestion degree (m*) | m*= m + (S2 -m) / m | m* < 1时,均匀分布;m* = 1时,随机分布;m* > 1时,聚集分布。 |
聚块指标(PI) Agglomeration index (PI) | m* / m | PI < 1时,均匀分布;PI = 1时,随机分布;当PI > 1时,聚集分布 |
Taylor幂法则 Taylor model | lgS2=lga+ blgm | lga= 0、b = 0时,随机分布;lga > 0、b = 1时,聚集分布,但聚集度不依赖于密度;lga> 0、b > 1时,聚集分布,聚集度依赖于密度;lga> 0、b < 1时,均匀分布,种群密度越高越均匀。 |
Fig.1 F.intonsa female adult Notes: A: female adult, B: antenna, C: fore-wing, D: head, E: pronotum, F: mesonotum & metanotum, G: sternites Ⅱ-Ⅲ, H: sternites Ⅲ-Ⅳ, I: sternites Ⅷ-Ⅹ.
Fig.2 F.intonsa male adult Notes: A: male adult, B: antenna, C: head, D: pronotum, E: mesonotum & metanotum, F: sternites Ⅰ-Ⅲ, G: sternites Ⅵ-Ⅶ, H: sternites Ⅷ-Ⅹ.
Fig.3 T.tabaci female adult Notes: A: female adult, B: antenna, C: fore-wing, D: head, E: pronotum, F: mesonotum & metanotum, G: sternites Ⅱ-Ⅲ, H: sternites Ⅲ-Ⅳ, I: sternites Ⅷ-Ⅹ.
时间 Date | 采集点 Location | 棉花种类 Cotton type | 样品数量 Sample size | 烟蓟马 T.tabaci | 花蓟马 F.intonsa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品数量 Sample size | 百分比 Percentage(%) | 样品数量 Sample size | 百分比 Percentage(%) | ||||
5月 | 莎车县 | 陆地棉 | 11 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
巴楚县 | 陆地棉 | 12 | 11 | 91.67 | 1 | 8.33 | |
7月 | 阿克苏市① | 长绒棉 | 43 | 1 | 2.33 | 42 | 97.67 |
阿克苏市② | 陆地棉 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 100 | |
阿克苏市③ | 长绒棉 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | |
库车市① | 陆地棉 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | |
库车市② | 陆地棉 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 100 | |
巴楚县① | 陆地棉 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 100 | |
巴楚县② | 陆地棉 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | |
巴楚县③ | 陆地棉 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100 | |
8月 | 图木舒克市 | 陆地棉 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 100 |
库车市① | 陆地棉 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 100 | |
库车市② | 陆地棉 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 100 | |
库车市③ | 陆地棉 | 170 | 0 | 0 | 170 | 100 | |
新和县① | 陆地棉 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 100 | |
新和县② | 陆地棉 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 124 | 100 | |
新和县③ | 陆地棉 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 127 | 100 |
Tab.2 Identification results of thrips in the field of different geographical regions
时间 Date | 采集点 Location | 棉花种类 Cotton type | 样品数量 Sample size | 烟蓟马 T.tabaci | 花蓟马 F.intonsa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
样品数量 Sample size | 百分比 Percentage(%) | 样品数量 Sample size | 百分比 Percentage(%) | ||||
5月 | 莎车县 | 陆地棉 | 11 | 11 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
巴楚县 | 陆地棉 | 12 | 11 | 91.67 | 1 | 8.33 | |
7月 | 阿克苏市① | 长绒棉 | 43 | 1 | 2.33 | 42 | 97.67 |
阿克苏市② | 陆地棉 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 64 | 100 | |
阿克苏市③ | 长绒棉 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | |
库车市① | 陆地棉 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | |
库车市② | 陆地棉 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 100 | |
巴楚县① | 陆地棉 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 100 | |
巴楚县② | 陆地棉 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 100 | |
巴楚县③ | 陆地棉 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 24 | 100 | |
8月 | 图木舒克市 | 陆地棉 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 72 | 100 |
库车市① | 陆地棉 | 84 | 0 | 0 | 84 | 100 | |
库车市② | 陆地棉 | 58 | 0 | 0 | 58 | 100 | |
库车市③ | 陆地棉 | 170 | 0 | 0 | 170 | 100 | |
新和县① | 陆地棉 | 144 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 100 | |
新和县② | 陆地棉 | 124 | 0 | 0 | 124 | 100 | |
新和县③ | 陆地棉 | 127 | 0 | 0 | 127 | 100 |
时间 Date (M/D) | 样本数量 Sample size | 鉴定结果 Result | |
---|---|---|---|
种类 Species | 百分比 Percentage(%) | ||
6/20 | 46 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
6/25 | 47 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
6/30 | 49 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/5 | 59 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/10 | 95 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/14 | 107 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/16 | 136 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/24 | 270 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/30 | 241 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/5 | 107 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/10 | 79 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/15 | 58 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/23 | 26 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/28 | 21 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
9/3 | 8 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
合计 | 1 349 |
Tab.3 Identification results of thrips in the field
时间 Date (M/D) | 样本数量 Sample size | 鉴定结果 Result | |
---|---|---|---|
种类 Species | 百分比 Percentage(%) | ||
6/20 | 46 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
6/25 | 47 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
6/30 | 49 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/5 | 59 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/10 | 95 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/14 | 107 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/16 | 136 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/24 | 270 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
7/30 | 241 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/5 | 107 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/10 | 79 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/15 | 58 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/23 | 26 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
8/28 | 21 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
9/3 | 8 | 花蓟马 | 100 |
合计 | 1 349 |
Fig.6 Changes of cumulative occurrence of F.intonsa on different organs of the cotton at different periods Notes: Data are mean±SE.** shows significant difference at P < 0.01 by Student's t test.Distinct lowercase letters show significant difference at P < 0.05 by Duncan's new multiple range test.A: initial growth period, B: peak outbreak period, C: decline period, D: total period.
日期 Date (M/D) | 样方均数 m | 方差 S2 | 扩散系数 C | 聚块指标 PI | 负二项参数 k | 丛生指标 I | 久野指数 CA | 分布型 Distribution pattern |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/20 | 2.05 | 2.11 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 65.49 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 随机分布 |
6/25 | 1.33 | 6.69 | 5.02 | 4.01 | 0.33 | 4.02 | 3.01 | 聚集分布 |
6/30 | 1.93 | 4.10 | 2.12 | 1.58 | 1.73 | 1.12 | 0.58 | 聚集分布 |
7/05 | 2.80 | 3.96 | 1.41 | 1.15 | 6.76 | 0.41 | 0.15 | 聚集分布 |
7/10 | 7.57 | 47.31 | 6.25 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 5.25 | 0.69 | 聚集分布 |
7/14 | 16.27 | 87.73 | 5.39 | 1.27 | 3.70 | 4.39 | 0.27 | 聚集分布 |
7/19 | 18.82 | 54.62 | 2.90 | 1.10 | 9.89 | 1.90 | 0.10 | 聚集分布 |
7/24 | 25.40 | 283.74 | 11.17 | 1.40 | 2.50 | 10.17 | 0.40 | 聚集分布 |
7/29 | 59.63 | 1 081.10 | 18.13 | 1.29 | 3.48 | 17.13 | 0.29 | 聚集分布 |
8/05 | 208.57 | 12 897.58 | 61.84 | 1.29 | 3.43 | 60.84 | 0.29 | 聚集分布 |
8/10 | 145.98 | 18 064.38 | 123.74 | 1.84 | 1.19 | 122.74 | 0.84 | 聚集分布 |
8/18 | 41.82 | 4 164.55 | 99.59 | 3.36 | 0.42 | 98.59 | 2.36 | 聚集分布 |
8/23 | 53.03 | 14 083.97 | 265.57 | 5.99 | 0.20 | 264.57 | 4.99 | 聚集分布 |
8/28 | 1.43 | 4.08 | 2.85 | 2.29 | 0.78 | 1.85 | 1.29 | 聚集分布 |
9/03 | 0.37 | 0.60 | 1.63 | 2.73 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 1.73 | 聚集分布 |
Tab.4 Aggregation indices of F.intonsa populations
日期 Date (M/D) | 样方均数 m | 方差 S2 | 扩散系数 C | 聚块指标 PI | 负二项参数 k | 丛生指标 I | 久野指数 CA | 分布型 Distribution pattern |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/20 | 2.05 | 2.11 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 65.49 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 随机分布 |
6/25 | 1.33 | 6.69 | 5.02 | 4.01 | 0.33 | 4.02 | 3.01 | 聚集分布 |
6/30 | 1.93 | 4.10 | 2.12 | 1.58 | 1.73 | 1.12 | 0.58 | 聚集分布 |
7/05 | 2.80 | 3.96 | 1.41 | 1.15 | 6.76 | 0.41 | 0.15 | 聚集分布 |
7/10 | 7.57 | 47.31 | 6.25 | 1.69 | 1.44 | 5.25 | 0.69 | 聚集分布 |
7/14 | 16.27 | 87.73 | 5.39 | 1.27 | 3.70 | 4.39 | 0.27 | 聚集分布 |
7/19 | 18.82 | 54.62 | 2.90 | 1.10 | 9.89 | 1.90 | 0.10 | 聚集分布 |
7/24 | 25.40 | 283.74 | 11.17 | 1.40 | 2.50 | 10.17 | 0.40 | 聚集分布 |
7/29 | 59.63 | 1 081.10 | 18.13 | 1.29 | 3.48 | 17.13 | 0.29 | 聚集分布 |
8/05 | 208.57 | 12 897.58 | 61.84 | 1.29 | 3.43 | 60.84 | 0.29 | 聚集分布 |
8/10 | 145.98 | 18 064.38 | 123.74 | 1.84 | 1.19 | 122.74 | 0.84 | 聚集分布 |
8/18 | 41.82 | 4 164.55 | 99.59 | 3.36 | 0.42 | 98.59 | 2.36 | 聚集分布 |
8/23 | 53.03 | 14 083.97 | 265.57 | 5.99 | 0.20 | 264.57 | 4.99 | 聚集分布 |
8/28 | 1.43 | 4.08 | 2.85 | 2.29 | 0.78 | 1.85 | 1.29 | 聚集分布 |
9/03 | 0.37 | 0.60 | 1.63 | 2.73 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 1.73 | 聚集分布 |
[1] | 北京农业大学. 昆虫学通论-下册(2版.)[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1993. |
Beijing Agricultural University. General theory of entomology-volume II(2nd ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1993. | |
[2] | Morse J G, Hoddle M S. Invasion biology of Thrips[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2006, 51: 67-89. |
[3] | Mirab-balou M, Tong X L, Feng J N, et al. Thrips (Insecta: Thysanoptera) of China[J]. Check List, 2011, 7(6): 720. |
[4] |
Riley D G, Pappu H R. Tactics for management of Thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and tomato spotted wilt virus in tomato[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2004, 97(5): 1648-1658.
DOI PMID |
[5] | 张维球. 几种捕食性蓟马[J]. 昆虫天敌, 1980, 2(1): 1-6. |
ZHANG Weiqiu. Several predatory Thrips[J]. Natural Enemies of Insects, 1980, 2(1): 1-6. | |
[6] | 韩冬银, 邢楚明, 李磊, 等. 海南芒果蓟马种群的活动及消长规律[J]. 热带作物学报, 2015, 36(7): 1297-1301. |
HAN Dongyin, XING Chuming, LI Lei, et al. Population activities and occurrence dynamics of Thrips in mango orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2015, 36(7): 1297-1301. | |
[7] | 蒋兴川, 李志华, 曹志勇, 等. 蔬菜花期蓟马的种群动态与空间分布研究[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2013, 50(6): 1628-1636. |
JIANG Xingchuan, LI Zhihua, CAO Zhiyong, et al. Population dynamics and spatial distribution of Thrips on vegetables flowers[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2013, 50(6): 1628-1636. | |
[8] | 范咏梅, 童晓立, 高良举, 等. 普通大蓟马在海南豇豆上的空间分布型[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2013, 35(6): 737-743. |
FAN Yongmei, TONG Xiaoli, GAO Liangju, et al. The spatial aggregation pattern of dominant species of Thrips on cowpea in Hainan[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2013, 35(6): 737-743. | |
[9] | 付步礼, 夏西亚, 邱海燕, 等. 香蕉园黄胸蓟马成虫种群的活动节律、消长规律与空间分布[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(13): 4996-5004. |
FU Buli, XIA Xiya, QIU Haiyan, et al. Population activities, occurrence dynamics, and spatial distribution pattern of Thrips hawaiiensis in banana orchards[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(13): 4996-5004. | |
[10] | 丁岩钦. 昆虫种群数学生态学原理与应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1980. |
DING Yanqin. Principle and application of mathematical ecology of insect population[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1980. | |
[11] | David F N, Moore P G. Notes on contagious distributions in plant populations[J]. Annals of Botany, 1954, 18(1): 47-53. |
[12] | 韩铭哲. 关于负二项分布参数k值的讨论[J]. 生物数学学报, 1989, 4(2): 97-101. |
HAN Mingzhe. A discussion on parameter k of negative binomial distribution[J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 1989, 4(2): 97-101. | |
[13] | 戈峰. 昆虫生态学原理与方法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008. |
GE Feng. Principle and methods of insect ecology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2008. | |
[14] | Lloyd M. Mean crowding[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 1967, 36(1): 1-30. |
[15] | Taylor L R. Aggregation, variance and the mean[J]. Nature, 1961, 189: 732-735. |
[16] | Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4[J]. Journal of Statistical Software, 2015, 67(1): 1-48. |
[17] | 杨海峰, 王惠珍, 马祁. 棉田烟蓟马的发生与防治[J]. 新疆农业科学, 1985, 22(3): 24-25. |
YANG Haifeng, WANG Huizhen, MA Qi. Occurrence and control of tobacco Thrips in cotton field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 1985, 22(3): 24-25. | |
[18] | 李国英. 新疆棉花病虫害及其防治[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017: 207-211. |
LI Guoying. Cotton pests and diseases in Xinjiang and their control[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2017: 207-211. | |
[19] |
Teerling C R, Pierce H D Jr, Borden J H, et al. Identification and bioactivity of alarm pheromone in the western flower Thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 1993, 19(4): 681-697.
DOI PMID |
[20] | Hulshof J, Ketoja E, Vänninen I. Life history characteristics of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber leaves with and without supplemental food[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2003, 108(1): 19-32. |
[21] | Zhi J R, Fitch G K, Margolies D C, et al. Apple pollen as a supplemental food for the western flower Thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis: response of individuals and populations[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2005, 117(3): 185-192. |
[22] | 李强, 刘奎, 付步礼, 等. 不同食料对黄胸蓟马生物学特性的影响[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(1): 136-143. |
LI Qiang, LIU Kui, FU Buli, et al. Effects of different diets on the biological characteristics of the Thrips hawaiiensis[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(1): 136-143. | |
[23] |
Hamilton J G C, Hall D R, Kirk W D J. Identification of a male-produced aggregation pheromone in the western flower Thrips Frankliniella occidentalis[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 2005, 31(6): 1369-1379.
PMID |
[24] |
Li X, Geng S, Zhang Z, et al. Species-specific aggregation pheromones contribute to coexistence in two closely related Thrips species[J]. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 2019, 109(1): 119-126.
DOI PMID |
[1] | SUN Caiqin, WU Jia, HUANG Hai, GUO Jiaxin, MIN Wei, GUO Huijuan. Effects of different saline and alkaline stress on the proteome of cotton root system [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 146-160. |
[2] | LAI Chengxia, YANG Yanlong, WANG Penglong, ZHU Mengyu, YANG Dong, LI Chunping, GE Fengwei, Mayila Yusuyin, YANG Ni, MA Jun. Pathogen colony’s morphological characteristics and pathogenicity identification of defioating cotton Verticillium wilt in some areas in northern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 174-181. |
[3] | WEN Fang, LIAO Na, WANG Na, JIN Jing, YAO Yiqiang. Adsorption and immobilization of Cd2+ by cotton straw biochar [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 225-233. |
[4] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[5] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[6] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[7] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[8] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[9] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[10] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[11] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[12] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[13] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[14] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[15] | XIAO Shuting, YAN An, WANG Weixia, ZHANG Qingqing, HOU Zhengqing, MA Mengqian, SUN Zhe. Analysis of spatial and temporal variations of aboveground biomass and the factors affecting it in a typical forest area in the central Tianshan Mountains [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2237-2244. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 15
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 73
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||