Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (10): 2521-2531.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.022
• Plant Protection·Microbes·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIU Ping1(), ZHANG Kai1(), MA Chao2, ZHANG Hui1, YANG Chuan1
Received:
2023-01-07
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-11-01
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Kai (1986- ), male, native place: Huojia, Henan.Associate professor, research field: Cropland nutrient cycling (E-mail) Supported by:
通讯作者:
张凯(1986-),男,河南获嘉人,副教授,博士,研究方向为养分循环,(E-mail)作者简介:
柳萍(1997-),女,新疆奎屯人,硕士研究生,研究方向为磷肥高效利用,(E-mail)1732479593@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LIU Ping, ZHANG Kai, MA Chao, ZHANG Hui, YANG Chuan. Evaluation of the comprehensive efficiency of cotton field with different phosphate fertilizer dosage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2521-2531.
柳萍, 张凯, 马超, 张慧, 杨川. 有机物料对不同磷肥用量条件下棉田综合效益评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2521-2531.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.022
处理 Treatment | 产量 Output (kg/hm2) | 速效磷 Olsen-P (mg/kg) | 酶活性 ALP (mg/(g·h)) | 微生物生物量 Microbial biomass (mg/kg) | 磷肥利用率 REP (%) | 植物生物量 Plant biomass (g/3株) | 植物累计吸磷量 Plants P uptake (kg/hm2) | 经济效益 Economic benefits (元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP0 | 3 736.09 | 20.85 | 233.71 | 7.67 | - | 75.15 | 51.14 | 905.00 |
MAP50 | 4 776.47 | 26.21 | 214.19 | 17.71 | 19.16 | 99.53 | 63.86 | 9 038.75 |
MAP100 | 4 672.65 | 26.09 | 216.51 | 22.61 | 32.97 | 85.24 | 53.39 | 8 021.25 |
MAP150 | 4 933.16 | 21.33 | 239.78 | 24.42 | 17.35 | 113.68 | 46.85 | 9 917.50 |
MAP0+OF | 3 993.35 | 24.03 | 212.81 | 15.33 | - | 94.78 | 51.72 | 3 466.25 |
MAP50+OF | 4 639.45 | 26.79 | 208.32 | 19.38 | 29.64 | 124.69 | 52.54 | 8 535.00 |
MAP100+OF | 5 355.11 | 29.83 | 227.02 | 21.57 | 35.62 | 148.74 | 65.61 | 14 071.25 |
MAP150+OF | 4 903.93 | 29.03 | 212.36 | 27.37 | 21.61 | 131.56 | 63.27 | 10 465.00 |
MAP0+OA | 3 859.06 | 28.33 | 235.38 | 9.33 | - | 87.42 | 48.19 | 1 811.25 |
MAP50+OA | 4 954.21 | 30.27 | 234.22 | 21.93 | 29.17 | 101.85 | 45.87 | 10 383.75 |
MAP100+OA | 5 194.85 | 27.10 | 202.67 | 13.78 | 24.12 | 107.46 | 69.51 | 12 122.50 |
MAP150+OA | 4 583.73 | 32.02 | 251.02 | 11.58 | 11.14 | 102.70 | 45.87 | 7 046.25 |
MAP0+BC | 4 698.23 | 24.33 | 213.44 | 9.42 | - | 95.56 | 60.67 | 8 602.50 |
MAP50+BC | 4 864.01 | 30.09 | 234.44 | 13.47 | 25.87 | 96.65 | 75.59 | 9 741.25 |
MAP100+BC | 4 513.73 | 29.76 | 227.68 | 24.12 | 33.15 | 95.15 | 62.78 | 6 772.50 |
MAP150+BC | 4 681.85 | 30.16 | 198.22 | 20.72 | 18.14 | 100.92 | 57.26 | 7 910.00 |
Tab.1 Cotton field evaluation indicators
处理 Treatment | 产量 Output (kg/hm2) | 速效磷 Olsen-P (mg/kg) | 酶活性 ALP (mg/(g·h)) | 微生物生物量 Microbial biomass (mg/kg) | 磷肥利用率 REP (%) | 植物生物量 Plant biomass (g/3株) | 植物累计吸磷量 Plants P uptake (kg/hm2) | 经济效益 Economic benefits (元/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP0 | 3 736.09 | 20.85 | 233.71 | 7.67 | - | 75.15 | 51.14 | 905.00 |
MAP50 | 4 776.47 | 26.21 | 214.19 | 17.71 | 19.16 | 99.53 | 63.86 | 9 038.75 |
MAP100 | 4 672.65 | 26.09 | 216.51 | 22.61 | 32.97 | 85.24 | 53.39 | 8 021.25 |
MAP150 | 4 933.16 | 21.33 | 239.78 | 24.42 | 17.35 | 113.68 | 46.85 | 9 917.50 |
MAP0+OF | 3 993.35 | 24.03 | 212.81 | 15.33 | - | 94.78 | 51.72 | 3 466.25 |
MAP50+OF | 4 639.45 | 26.79 | 208.32 | 19.38 | 29.64 | 124.69 | 52.54 | 8 535.00 |
MAP100+OF | 5 355.11 | 29.83 | 227.02 | 21.57 | 35.62 | 148.74 | 65.61 | 14 071.25 |
MAP150+OF | 4 903.93 | 29.03 | 212.36 | 27.37 | 21.61 | 131.56 | 63.27 | 10 465.00 |
MAP0+OA | 3 859.06 | 28.33 | 235.38 | 9.33 | - | 87.42 | 48.19 | 1 811.25 |
MAP50+OA | 4 954.21 | 30.27 | 234.22 | 21.93 | 29.17 | 101.85 | 45.87 | 10 383.75 |
MAP100+OA | 5 194.85 | 27.10 | 202.67 | 13.78 | 24.12 | 107.46 | 69.51 | 12 122.50 |
MAP150+OA | 4 583.73 | 32.02 | 251.02 | 11.58 | 11.14 | 102.70 | 45.87 | 7 046.25 |
MAP0+BC | 4 698.23 | 24.33 | 213.44 | 9.42 | - | 95.56 | 60.67 | 8 602.50 |
MAP50+BC | 4 864.01 | 30.09 | 234.44 | 13.47 | 25.87 | 96.65 | 75.59 | 9 741.25 |
MAP100+BC | 4 513.73 | 29.76 | 227.68 | 24.12 | 33.15 | 95.15 | 62.78 | 6 772.50 |
MAP150+BC | 4 681.85 | 30.16 | 198.22 | 20.72 | 18.14 | 100.92 | 57.26 | 7 910.00 |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Output | 速效磷 Olsen-P | 酶活性 ALP | 微生物生物量 Microbial biomass | 磷肥 利用率 REP | 植物生物量 Plant biomass | 植物累计 吸磷量 Plants P uptake | 经济效益 Economic benefits |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP0 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.31 | - | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.09 |
MAP50 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
MAP100 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
MAP150 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
MAP0+OF | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.56 | - | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.25 |
MAP50+OF | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.61 |
MAP100+OF | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAP150+OF | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.74 |
MAP0+OA | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.43 | - | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.15 |
MAP50+OA | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.86 |
MAP100+OA | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAP150+OA | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.96 | 0.66 | 0.58 |
MAP0+BC | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.88 |
MAP50+BC | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAP100+BC | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.70 |
MAP150+BC | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.81 |
Tab.2 Infinite tempering of cotton field evaluation indicators
处理 Treatment | 产量 Output | 速效磷 Olsen-P | 酶活性 ALP | 微生物生物量 Microbial biomass | 磷肥 利用率 REP | 植物生物量 Plant biomass | 植物累计 吸磷量 Plants P uptake | 经济效益 Economic benefits |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP0 | 0.76 | 0.80 | 0.97 | 0.31 | - | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.09 |
MAP50 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.73 | 0.58 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.91 |
MAP100 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
MAP150 | 1.00 | 0.81 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 1.00 | 0.73 | 1.00 |
MAP0+OF | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.94 | 0.56 | - | 0.64 | 0.79 | 0.25 |
MAP50+OF | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.61 |
MAP100+OF | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAP150+OF | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.74 |
MAP0+OA | 0.74 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 0.43 | - | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.15 |
MAP50+OA | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.95 | 0.66 | 0.86 |
MAP100+OA | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAP150+OA | 0.88 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.53 | 0.38 | 0.96 | 0.66 | 0.58 |
MAP0+BC | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 0.80 | 0.88 |
MAP50+BC | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.56 | 0.78 | 0.96 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
MAP100+BC | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.83 | 0.70 |
MAP150+BC | 0.96 | 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.81 |
Fig.1 Evaluation of cotton field indicators under different phosphate fertiliser gradients Note:CK×10、50、100、150 kg P2O5/hm2,1-2:Yield:2-3:Rapid available phosphorus;3-4:Shouting phosphatase activity;4-5:Microbial biomass;5-6:Utilixation rate of phosphate;6-7:Plant dionass;7-8:Cumulative phosphorus optakeby plants;8-1:ferticizer Economlc benefit,the same as below
处理 Treatment | 雷达图面积 Radar map area S | 雷达图周长 Radar map circumference L | 面积评价值 Area evaluation value V1 | 周长评价值 Perimeter evaluation V2 | 评价值 Evaluation result Y | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP0 | 1.310 3 | 0.711 4 | 0.437 9 | 0.849 5 | 0.609 9 | 16 |
MAP50 | 2.435 4 | 0.912 8 | 0.814 0 | 0.987 9 | 0.896 7 | 9 |
MAP100 | 2.551 9 | 0.887 7 | 0.852 9 | 0.995 6 | 0.921 5 | 5 |
MAP150 | 2.539 4 | 0.779 2 | 0.848 7 | 0.982 7 | 0.913 3 | 7 |
MAP0+OF | 1.255 8 | 0.957 7 | 0.419 7 | 0.887 5 | 0.610 3 | 15 |
MAP50+OF | 2.089 7 | 1.059 7 | 0.698 4 | 0.992 9 | 0.832 7 | 11 |
MAP100+OF | 2.992 5 | 0.763 4 | 1.000 2 | 0.997 5 | 0.998 8 | 1 |
MAP150+OF | 2.467 5 | 0.869 6 | 0.824 7 | 0.989 9 | 0.903 5 | 8 |
MAP0+OA | 1.391 5 | 0.767 6 | 0.465 1 | 0.871 3 | 0.636 6 | 14 |
MAP50+OA | 2.648 4 | 0.849 9 | 0.885 2 | 0.993 6 | 0.937 8 | 4 |
MAP100+OA | 2.537 3 | 0.889 1 | 0.848 0 | 0.990 1 | 0.916 3 | 6 |
MAP150+OA | 1.920 6 | 0.941 5 | 0.641 9 | 0.957 4 | 0.783 9 | 12 |
MAP0+BC | 1.920 9 | 0.774 4 | 0.642 0 | 0.912 5 | 0.765 4 | 13 |
MAP50+BC | 2.686 1 | 0.812 2 | 0.897 8 | 0.986 6 | 0.941 1 | 3 |
MAP100+BC | 2.688 0 | 0.847 6 | 0.898 4 | 0.994 3 | 0.945 2 | 2 |
MAP150+BC | 2.323 6 | 0.897 9 | 0.776 6 | 0.986 7 | 0.875 3 | 10 |
Tab.3 Comprehensive evaluation of cotton field under different amount of phosphorus fertilizer
处理 Treatment | 雷达图面积 Radar map area S | 雷达图周长 Radar map circumference L | 面积评价值 Area evaluation value V1 | 周长评价值 Perimeter evaluation V2 | 评价值 Evaluation result Y | 排序 Rank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAP0 | 1.310 3 | 0.711 4 | 0.437 9 | 0.849 5 | 0.609 9 | 16 |
MAP50 | 2.435 4 | 0.912 8 | 0.814 0 | 0.987 9 | 0.896 7 | 9 |
MAP100 | 2.551 9 | 0.887 7 | 0.852 9 | 0.995 6 | 0.921 5 | 5 |
MAP150 | 2.539 4 | 0.779 2 | 0.848 7 | 0.982 7 | 0.913 3 | 7 |
MAP0+OF | 1.255 8 | 0.957 7 | 0.419 7 | 0.887 5 | 0.610 3 | 15 |
MAP50+OF | 2.089 7 | 1.059 7 | 0.698 4 | 0.992 9 | 0.832 7 | 11 |
MAP100+OF | 2.992 5 | 0.763 4 | 1.000 2 | 0.997 5 | 0.998 8 | 1 |
MAP150+OF | 2.467 5 | 0.869 6 | 0.824 7 | 0.989 9 | 0.903 5 | 8 |
MAP0+OA | 1.391 5 | 0.767 6 | 0.465 1 | 0.871 3 | 0.636 6 | 14 |
MAP50+OA | 2.648 4 | 0.849 9 | 0.885 2 | 0.993 6 | 0.937 8 | 4 |
MAP100+OA | 2.537 3 | 0.889 1 | 0.848 0 | 0.990 1 | 0.916 3 | 6 |
MAP150+OA | 1.920 6 | 0.941 5 | 0.641 9 | 0.957 4 | 0.783 9 | 12 |
MAP0+BC | 1.920 9 | 0.774 4 | 0.642 0 | 0.912 5 | 0.765 4 | 13 |
MAP50+BC | 2.686 1 | 0.812 2 | 0.897 8 | 0.986 6 | 0.941 1 | 3 |
MAP100+BC | 2.688 0 | 0.847 6 | 0.898 4 | 0.994 3 | 0.945 2 | 2 |
MAP150+BC | 2.323 6 | 0.897 9 | 0.776 6 | 0.986 7 | 0.875 3 | 10 |
[1] | 吕双庆. 有机肥料对土壤磷素的影响及磷肥对小麦的增产原因[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2003. |
LYU Shuangqing. Effects of organic fertilizer on soil phosphates and reasons for increasing production of phosphorus fertilizer on wheat[D]. Yang ling: Northwest A & F University, 2003. | |
[2] | 苏倩, 侯振安, 赵靓, 等. 生物碳对土壤磷素和棉花养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(3):642-650. |
SU Qian, HOU Zhen'an, ZHAO Liang, et al. Effects of biocarbon on the nutrient uptake of soil phosphorus and cotton[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20 (3): 642-650. | |
[3] |
Glaser B, Lehmann J, Zech W. Ameliorting physical and chemical properties of hi-ghly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal—A review[J]. Biology and Fertility of soils, 2002, 35(4):219-230.
DOI URL |
[4] |
Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M. Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems A eview[J]. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2006, 11(2):403-427.
DOI URL |
[5] | 邢英, 李心清, 周志红, 等. 生物炭对水体中铵氮的吸附特征及其动力学研究[J]. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(4):511-516. |
XING Ying, LI Xingqing, ZHOU Zhihong, et al. The characteristics and dynamics of ammonium adsorption in water[J]. Earth and the Environment, 2011, 39 (4): 511-516. | |
[6] | 周志红, 李心清, 邢英, 等. 生物炭对土壤氮素淋失的抑制作用[J]. 地球与环境, 2011, 39(2):278-284. |
ZHOU Zhihong, LI Xinqing, XING Ying, et al. Inhibition effect of biochar on soil nitrogen lymphatic loss[J]. Earth and the Environment, 2011, 39 (2): 278-284. | |
[7] | 王永壮, 陈欣, 史奕, 等. 低分子量有机酸对土壤磷活化及其机制研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(7):2189-2198. |
WANG Yongzhuang, CHEN Xin, SHI Yi, et al. Progress in the activation and mechanism of low molecular weight organic acids[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37 (7): 2189-2198. | |
[8] | 陈宇晖, 李方敏. 有机酸对土壤磷吸附的影响[J]. 湖北农学院学报, 1998,(2):3-5. |
CHEN Yuhui, LI Fangmin. Effects of organic acids on soil phosphorus adsorption[J]. Journal of Hubei Agricultural College, 1998,(2): 3-5. | |
[9] | 胡红青, 李妍, 贺纪正. 土壤有机酸与磷素相互作用的研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2004,(2): 222-229. |
HU Hongqing, LI Yan, HE Jizheng. Study on the interaction of organic acids and phosphorus elements in soil[J]. Soil Bulletin, 2004,(2): 222-229. | |
[10] | 李迟园. 低磷土壤施用有机酸和根外施磷对玉米磷吸收及生长的影响[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2011. |
LI Chiyuan. Effect of organic acid and external root application of phosphorus on maize phosphorus absorption and growth[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2011. | |
[11] | Xin X, Qin S, Zhang J, et al. Yield,phosphorus use efficiency and balance response to substituting long-term chemical fertilizer use with organic manure ina wheatmaize system[J]. FieldCrops Research,2017, 208(2017):27-33. |
[12] | 宋晓, 黄晨晨, 黄绍敏, 等. 不同耕作和有机培肥措施对土壤理化性质及小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020,(3):102-108. |
SONG Xiao, HUANG Chenchen, HUANG Shaomin, et al. Effect of different tillage and organic fertilizer cultivation measures on soil physicochemical properties and wheat yield[J]. Crop Magazine, 2020,(3): 102-108. | |
[13] | 石鑫蕊, 任彬彬, 江琳琳, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对水稻光合速率、氮素利用率和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 12(3):1-10. |
SHI Xinrui, REN Binbin, JIANG Linlin, et al. Effect of replacement of organic fertilizers on photosynthetic rate, nitrogen utilization and yield in rice[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 12 (3): 1-10.
DOI URL |
|
[14] |
Sarah R. Noack et al. Management of crop residues affects the transfer of phosphorus to plant and soil pools: Results from a dual-labelling experiment[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2014, 71:31-39.
DOI URL |
[15] | 章永松, 林咸永, 罗安程, 等. 有机肥(物)对土壤中磷的活化作用及机理研究─Ⅰ.有机肥(物)对土壤不同形态无机磷的活化作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998,(2):145-150. |
ZHANG Yongsong, LIN Xianyong, LUO Ancheng, et al. Activation effect of organic fertilizer (material) on different forms of soil inorganic phosphorus─ I[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 1998,(2): 145-150. | |
[16] | 章永松, 林咸永, 罗安程. 有机肥(物)对土壤中磷的活化作用及机理研究─Ⅱ.有机肥(物)分解产生的有机酸及其对不同形态磷的活化作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998,(2):151-155. |
ZHANG Yongsong, LIN Xianyong, LUO Ancheng. Actiactivation and mechanism of organic fertilizer (material) on phosphorus in soil ─Ⅱ.Organic acids produced by the decomposition of organic fertilizer (substances) and their activation effect on different forms of phosphorus[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 1998,(2): 151-155. | |
[17] | 宋晓, 黄晨晨, 黄绍敏, 等. 不同耕作和有机培肥措施对土壤理化性质及小麦产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, 196(3):102-108. |
SONG Xiao, HUANG Chenchen, HUANG Shaomin, et al. Effect of different tillage and organic fertilizer cultivation measures on soil physicochemical properties and wheat yield[J]. Crop Magazine, 2020, 196 (3): 102-108. | |
[18] | 石鑫蕊, 任彬彬, 江琳琳, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对水稻光合速率、氮素利用率和产量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 12(3):1-10. |
SHI Xinrui, REN Binbin, JIANG Linlin, et al. Effect of replacement of organic fertilizers on photosynthetic rate, nitrogen utilization and yield in rice[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 12 (3): 1-10.
DOI URL |
|
[19] | 王琛, 林启美, 赵小蓉, 等. 有机肥替代化肥对土壤养分动态及甜玉米生产的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020, 289(5):132-140. |
WANG Chen, LIN Qimei, ZHAO Xiaorong, et al. Effect of organic fertilizer replacing chemical fertilizer on soil nutrient dynamics and sweet corn production[J]. Soil and Fertilizer in China, 2020, 289 (5): 132-140. | |
[20] | 乔鹏程, 吴正国, 李辉. 基于改进雷达图法的电能质量综合评估方法[J]. 电力自动化设备, 2011, 31(6):88-92. |
QIAO Pengcheng, WU Zhengguo, LI Hui. Integrated power quality assessment method based on improved radar mapping method[J]. Power automation equipment, 2011, 31 (6): 88-92. | |
[21] | 朱唯韦. 基于主客观权重的配电系统电能质置综合评估[D]. 合肥: 安徽大学, 2019. |
ZHU Weiwei. Comprehensive evaluation of power quality of power distribution system based on subjective and objective weights[D]. Hefei: Anhui University, 2019. | |
[22] | 程志友, 朱唯韦, 陶青, 等. 基于改进雷达图的配电系统电能质量评估方法[J]. 电测与仪表, 2019, 56(14):34-39. |
CHENG Zhiyou, ZHU Weiwei, TAO Qing, et al. Power Quality Assessment Method of power distribution system based on improved radar diagram[J]. Electrical measurement and instrument, 2019, 56 (14): 34-39. | |
[23] | 王梓琪, 肖思曲, 程雨, 等. 贵州省医疗保障能力综合评价:基于TOPSIS、聚类、雷达图实证研究[J]. 中国医院, 2019, 23,(12):17-20. |
WANG Ziqi, XIAO Siqu, CHENG Yu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of medical security capability in Guizhou Province: based on the empirical research of TOPSIS, clustering and radar map[J]. China Hospital, 2019, 23, (12): 17-20. | |
[24] | 李健, 蔡红丹, 申利未, 等. 基于EGM-雷达图分析法的数字医疗信息服务水平综合评价[J]. 医学与社会, 2020, 33(2):39-44. |
LI Jian, CAI Hongdan, SHEN Liwei, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Digital Medical Information Service Level based on EGM-Radar Map Analysis[J]. Medicine and Society, 2020, 33 (2): 39-44. | |
[25] | 苏顺宝. 基于多维评价模型的长春市某中学教学评价系统的研究[D]. 大连: 大连海事大学, 2017. |
SU Shunbao. Research on the Teaching Evaluation System of a Middle School in Changchun Based on Multi-dimensional Evaluation Model[D]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University, 2017. | |
[26] | 刘哲, 王虎, 杨建宇, 等. 品种筛选多环境测试作图分析方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(10):142-147. |
LIU Zhe, WANG Hu, YANG Jianyu, et al. Mapping and analysis method for multi-environment testing for variety screening[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27 (10): 142-147. | |
[27] | 尉栋. 浅谈玉米区域试验新品种的综合评价[J]. 农技服务, 2017, 34(10):14. |
WEI Dong. Comprehensive Evaluation of New Variety[J]. Agricultural technology Service, 2017, 34 (10): 14. | |
[28] | 常世豪, 耿臻, 杨青春, 等. 改进雷达图分析法在大豆品种选育中的应用[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(6):862-868. |
CHANG Shihao, GENG Zhen, YANG Qingchun, et al. Application of Improving Radar Map Analysis in Soybean Variety Breeding[J]. Soy Science, 2020, 39 (6): 862-868. | |
[29] | 邓禄军, 夏锦慧, 卢扬, 等. 雷达图分析法在马铃薯品种特征综合评价中的应用[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2013, 41(7):59-62. |
DENG Lujun, XIA Jinhui, LU Yang, et al. Application of Radar Map Analysis in Comprehensive Evaluation of Potato Variety Characteristics[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Science, 2013, 41 (7): 59-62. | |
[30] |
方长云, 胡贤巧, 邵雅芳, 等. 基于雷达图分析法初步评价稻米食味品质的研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(2):13-17.
DOI |
FANG Changyun, HU Xianqiao, SHAO Yafang, et al. Study on Preliminary Evaluation of Rice Taste Quality Based on Radar Grram Analysis[J]. China Rice, 2017, 23 (2): 13-17. | |
[31] | 孟凡秋. 借助AutoCAD及雷达图对评估结果实现多维度分析的探究[J]. 现代职业教育, 2022(2):22-24. |
MENG Fanqiu. Exploration of multi-dimensional analysis with the help of AutoCAD and radar map[J]. Modern vocational Education, 2022 (2): 22-24. | |
[32] | 陈勇, 陈潇凯, 李志远, 等. 具有评价结果唯一性特征的雷达图综合评价法[J]. 北京理工大学学报, 2010, 30(12):1409-1412. |
CHEN Yong, CHEN Xiaokai, LI Zhiyuan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation method of radar diagram with the uniqueness feature of evaluation results[J]. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 2010, 30 (12): 1409-1412. |
[1] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[2] | YAO Qing, Aribelegan Hazzetti, YANG Minghua, LI Qiang, MIAO Haocui, CUI Hongliang. Response of quinoa seeds to germination temperature and identification of germination ability under low temperature stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149. |
[3] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[4] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[5] | MA Hui, DAI Lu, LI Xingxing, Abuduaini Abuduweili, Aimaierjiang Abulitifu, TIAN Liwen, OU Huan. Analysis of the influence of different chemical treatments on the sealing effect of long staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608. |
[6] | Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, ZHANG Yanhong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, DU Xiaojing, WANG Fengbin, LYU Yuping, Amanguli Aizizi. Screening and evaluation of aromatic rice varieties with high quality and high yield in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703. |
[7] | DOU Ziwei, YANG Lu, CHENG Ping, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Hong. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Nutritional Quality of Different Mulberry Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 127-139. |
[8] | MA Bin, WANG Shuai, WU Yiyan, JIANG Yan. Study on the Tire Effect of Farmland Shelter Forest in Arid Desert Area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2232-2239. |
[9] | LI Xiao, GUO Dongliang, LI Gongze, XUE Min, JIANG Haixia, YE Jiali, XIE Liqiong. Optimization of Salt Tolerance Identification System at Germination Stage of Flax and Comprehensive Assessment of Salt Tolerance of 150 Germplasms [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449. |
[10] | LI Jiangyan, ZHANG Xianhua, YUAN Xiaoqiang, YUAN Hui, LIU Wenxin. Study on the Growth Characteristics and Water Consumption Law of Dactylisglomerata Seedling under Drought Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1502-1512. |
[11] | MA YanMing, ZHAO LianJia, WANG Wei, AN Xuechun, XIANG Li, MIAO Yu. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Barley Germplasm Resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2628-2636. |
[12] | WANG Dongmei, PAN Hongsheng, LI Haiqiang, DING Ruifeng, Akedan Wuwaishi, LIU Jian, LI Haobin. Quantitatively Evaluate the Control Function of Predatory Natural Enemies on Cotton Aphids by DNA Molecular Detection Technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2661-2667. |
[13] | LI Jiangyu, ZHAO Qiang, WU Xueqin, MA Chunmei, REN Ruofei, XU Doudou, TIAN Yanqing. Effects of Moulding Agent on Agronomic Traits, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2352-2357. |
[14] | LIAO Niu, DIAO Ming, CUI Hongxin, NIU Ning, LIU Huiying. Effect of Drip Irrigation with Saltwater during Flowering on Main Characters of 10 Tomato Germplasm and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2486-2494. |
[15] | GAO Wencui, YANG Weijun, SHI Chunling, CHEN Lei. Study on Soil Organic Carbon and Its Change of Activity in Continuous Cropping Cotton Field under Mulched Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1603-1609. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||