Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2232-2239.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.018
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing·Soil Fertilizer·Water Saving Irrigation·Prataculture·Food Process Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
MA Bin(), WANG Shuai, WU Yiyan, JIANG Yan()
Received:
2021-12-01
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2023-01-16
Correspondence author:
JIANG Yan
Supported by:
通讯作者:
姜艳
作者简介:
马彬(1994-),男,新疆伊宁人,硕士研究生,研究方向为土壤生态与环境安全。(E-mail)mms151532@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
MA Bin, WANG Shuai, WU Yiyan, JIANG Yan. Study on the Tire Effect of Farmland Shelter Forest in Arid Desert Area[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2232-2239.
马彬, 王帅, 吴依衍, 姜艳. 干旱荒漠区农田防护林正负效应及其影响机制[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2232-2239.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.018
测点 Measuring point | 6月22日 (苗期 Seedling stage ) | 7月16日 (铃期 Bell period) | 8月2日 (蕾期 Bud stage) |
---|---|---|---|
0.1H | 5.14e | 24.12e | 46.39d |
0.25H | 11.45d | 88.25d | 177.45c |
0.5H | 40.04c | 139.55c | 241.76b |
1H | 50.17b | 154.60b | 261.21a |
2H | 60.89a | 161.07a | 267.31a |
3H | 61.04a | 164.34a | 271.75a |
Table 1 Changes in cotton biomass at different distances(%)
测点 Measuring point | 6月22日 (苗期 Seedling stage ) | 7月16日 (铃期 Bell period) | 8月2日 (蕾期 Bud stage) |
---|---|---|---|
0.1H | 5.14e | 24.12e | 46.39d |
0.25H | 11.45d | 88.25d | 177.45c |
0.5H | 40.04c | 139.55c | 241.76b |
1H | 50.17b | 154.60b | 261.21a |
2H | 60.89a | 161.07a | 267.31a |
3H | 61.04a | 164.34a | 271.75a |
项目 Item | 光照强度 Light intensity | 空气湿度 Air humidity | 风速 Wind speed | 空气温度 Air temperature | 蒸发量 Evaporation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 0.995 | 0.237 | 0.963 | 0.923 | 0.920 |
P | 0.000 | 0.326 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
Table 2 Leading factors of meteorological environment in the shelterbelt zone
项目 Item | 光照强度 Light intensity | 空气湿度 Air humidity | 风速 Wind speed | 空气温度 Air temperature | 蒸发量 Evaporation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 0.995 | 0.237 | 0.963 | 0.923 | 0.920 |
P | 0.000 | 0.326 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.005 |
测点 Measuring point | 4月30日-5月30日 | 6月10日-7月10日 | 7月25日-9月15日 |
---|---|---|---|
0.1H | 0.042b | 0.088c | 0.078c |
0.25H | 0.056b | 0.127c | 0.093c |
0.5H | 0.085b | 0.224c | 0.256c |
1H | 0.348b | 0.915b | 0.750b |
2H | 0.736a | 1.514a | 1.407a |
3H | 0.757a | 1.558a | 1.429a |
Table 3 Changes of light intensity in cotton fields at different distances
测点 Measuring point | 4月30日-5月30日 | 6月10日-7月10日 | 7月25日-9月15日 |
---|---|---|---|
0.1H | 0.042b | 0.088c | 0.078c |
0.25H | 0.056b | 0.127c | 0.093c |
0.5H | 0.085b | 0.224c | 0.256c |
1H | 0.348b | 0.915b | 0.750b |
2H | 0.736a | 1.514a | 1.407a |
3H | 0.757a | 1.558a | 1.429a |
7月16日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质(g/kg) Organic matter g/kg | 11.08 | 11.56 | 12.03 | 12.40 | 13.12 | 13.08 | |
Δ | -2 | -1.52 | -1.05 | -0.68 | 0.04 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -1.04 | 较3H降低7.97% | |||||
8月20日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
有机质(g/kg) Organic matter g/kg | 11.25 | 11.58 | 12.29 | 13.17 | 13.66 | 13.48 | |
Δ | -2.23 | -1.9 | -1.19 | -0.31 | 0.18 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -1.09 | 平均较3H降低8.09% |
Table 4 Soil organic matter content in different locations of the shelterbelt
7月16日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
有机质(g/kg) Organic matter g/kg | 11.08 | 11.56 | 12.03 | 12.40 | 13.12 | 13.08 | |
Δ | -2 | -1.52 | -1.05 | -0.68 | 0.04 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -1.04 | 较3H降低7.97% | |||||
8月20日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
有机质(g/kg) Organic matter g/kg | 11.25 | 11.58 | 12.29 | 13.17 | 13.66 | 13.48 | |
Δ | -2.23 | -1.9 | -1.19 | -0.31 | 0.18 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -1.09 | 平均较3H降低8.09% |
7月16日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全氮(g/kg) Total nitrogen g/kg | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.44 | |
Δ | -0.11 | -0.07 | -0.04 | -0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -0.04 | 平均较3H下降10.17% | |||||
8月20日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
全氮(g/kg) Total nitrogen g/kg | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.46 | |
Δ | -0.17 | -0.15 | -0.10 | -0.06 | 0.01 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -0.09 | 平均较3H下降20.55% |
Table 5 Soil total nitrogen content at different locations from the shelterbelt
7月16日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
全氮(g/kg) Total nitrogen g/kg | 0.33 | 0.37 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.45 | 0.44 | |
Δ | -0.11 | -0.07 | -0.04 | -0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -0.04 | 平均较3H下降10.17% | |||||
8月20日 | 测点 Point | 0.1H | 0.25H | 0.5H | 1H | 2H | 3H |
全氮(g/kg) Total nitrogen g/kg | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.47 | 0.46 | |
Δ | -0.17 | -0.15 | -0.10 | -0.06 | 0.01 | 0 | |
平均 Average | -0.09 | 平均较3H下降20.55% |
项目 Item | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total nitrogen | 碱解氮 Alkaline Nitrogen | 速效磷 Available Phosphorus | 速效钾 Available Potassium | 全盐 Full salt | pH | 土壤含水率 Soil moisture |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 0.980 | 0.992 | 0.934 | 0.901 | 0.923 | 0.798 | 0.367 | 0.972 |
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.029 | 0.237 | 0.001 |
Table 6 Soil fertility factors of the protection forest belt
项目 Item | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total nitrogen | 碱解氮 Alkaline Nitrogen | 速效磷 Available Phosphorus | 速效钾 Available Potassium | 全盐 Full salt | pH | 土壤含水率 Soil moisture |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 0.980 | 0.992 | 0.934 | 0.901 | 0.923 | 0.798 | 0.367 | 0.972 |
P | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.029 | 0.237 | 0.001 |
模型变量 Variables | 非标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficients | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | P值 P value | R | Sig | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | 标准误差 Standard error | 贝塔 Beta | ||||
常量 Constant | -45.486 | 1.849 | 0.002 | 0.798 | 0.044 | |
光照强度 Light intensity | 98.137 | 3.718 | 0.789 | 0.001 | ||
有机质 Organic matter | 1.285 | 1.054 | 0.013 | 0.014 | ||
全氮 Total nitrogen | 15.351 | 2.641 | 0.214 | 0.025 | ||
碱解氮 Alkaline Hydrolyzed Nitrogen | 10.369 | 2.336 | 0.156 | 0.001 | ||
土壤水分 Soil Moisture | 23.389 | 5.574 | 0.282 | 0.000 |
Table 7 Multiple stepwise regression analysis of landlord factors in shelterbelt threats
模型变量 Variables | 非标准化系数 Unstandardized coefficients | 标准化系数 Standardized coefficient | P值 P value | R | Sig | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | 标准误差 Standard error | 贝塔 Beta | ||||
常量 Constant | -45.486 | 1.849 | 0.002 | 0.798 | 0.044 | |
光照强度 Light intensity | 98.137 | 3.718 | 0.789 | 0.001 | ||
有机质 Organic matter | 1.285 | 1.054 | 0.013 | 0.014 | ||
全氮 Total nitrogen | 15.351 | 2.641 | 0.214 | 0.025 | ||
碱解氮 Alkaline Hydrolyzed Nitrogen | 10.369 | 2.336 | 0.156 | 0.001 | ||
土壤水分 Soil Moisture | 23.389 | 5.574 | 0.282 | 0.000 |
[1] | 朱玉伟, 王永红, 陈启民, 等. 新疆150团农田防护林胁地效应研究[J]. 防护林科技, 2010,(4):9-11. |
ZHU Yuwei, WANG Yonghong,. CHEN Qimin, et al. Study on the Tied Land Effect of Farmland Shelter Forest in Xinjiang 150[J]. Protection Forest Technology, 2010,(4):9-11. | |
[2] |
DENGRX, LI Y, ZHANG SW, et al. Assessment of the effects of the shelterbelt on the soil temperature atregional scale based on MODIS data[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2011, 22(1): 65-70.
DOI URL |
[3] |
Sagrario GV, Geoff MG, Anantanarayanan R, et al. Plant diversity and habitatstructureaffect tree growth,herbivoryand natural enemies in shelterbelts[J], Basic Appl. Ecol. 2010, 11: 542-549.
DOI URL |
[4] |
YAN QL, ZHU JJ, ZHENG X et al., Causal effects of shelter forests and water factors on desertification control during 2000-2010 at the Horqin Sandy Land region, China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2014, 26(1):33-45.
DOI URL |
[5] | 薛灵芝, 戴荣强. 农田防护林林带胁地原因及对策[J]. 内蒙古林业, 2001,(4):30. |
XUE Lingzhi, DAI Rongqiang. Causes and countermeasures of threatened land in farmland shelterbelts[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry, 2001,(4):30. | |
[6] | 朱廷曜, 关德新, 周广胜, 等. 农田防护林生态工程学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001. |
ZHU Tingyao, GUAN Dexin, ZHOU Guangsheng, et al. Ecologial Engineering of Farmland Shelterbelt[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Press, 2001. | |
[7] | Brandle J R, Hodges L, Zhou XH. Windbreaks in North American agricultural systems[J]. Agroforestry Systems, 2004, 61(1-3):65-78. |
[8] | 范志平, 关文彬, 曾德慧, 等. 东北地区农田防护林高效多功能经营的指标体系及标准研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(5):701-705. |
FAN Zhiping., GUAN Wenbin, ZEN Dehui, et al. Study on the index system and standards for efficient and multifunctional management of farmland shelterbelts in Northeast China[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 12(5):701-705.
DOI URL |
|
[9] | 崔晶. 豫东平原农林间作竞争与控制研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014. |
CUI Jing. A Study on the Competition and Control of Intercropping Between Agriculture and Forestry in the Eastern Henan Plain[D]. ZhenZHou: Henan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[10] | 尚静原, 赵焕成, 王宝珠. 农田防护林胁地效应及其解决对策[J]. 防护林科技, 2006,(4):71-97. |
SHANG Jingyuan, ZHAO Huancheng, WANG Baozhu. The threat effect of farmland shelterbelt and its countermeasures[J]. Protection Forest Technology, 2006,(4):71-97. | |
[11] | 阎富, 井国臣, 赵会明. 农田防护林带胁地及防治措施的研究[J]. 水土保持科技情报, 1998,(1):20-21. |
YAN Fu, JING Guochen, ZHAO Huiming. Study on threatened land and prevention measures of farmland shelterbelts[J]. Science and Technology Information of Soil and Water Conservation, 1998,(1):20-21. | |
[12] | J.P.A. LamersAgronomie and Soeio-Eeonomie Aspects of Windbreaks in Southwest-Niger,The Fourth International Symposium,Windbreaks and Agroforestry, 1993,Hedeselskabet Denmark. |
[13] | 赵凌泉, 李成烈, 赵岭, 等. 音河乡农田防护林胁地状况的调查研究[J]. 防护林科技, 1992,(1):1-5. |
ZHAO Lingquan, LI Chenglie, ZHAO Lin, et al. Investigation and Research on the Tied Land Condition of Farmland Shelterbelt in Yinhe Township[J]. Protection Forest Technology, 1992,(1):1-5. | |
[14] | 袁素芬, 陈亚宁, 李卫红. 干旱区新垦绿洲防护林体系的防护效益分析-以克拉玛依农业综合开发区为例[J]. 中国沙漠, 2007,(4):600-607. |
YUAN Sufen, CHEN Yaning, LI Weihong. Analysis of the protection benefit of the newly reclaimed oasis protection forest system in arid area——Taking Karamay Agricultural Comprehensive Development Zone as an example[J]. China Desert, 2007,(4):600-607. | |
[15] | Cleugh HA. Effect of wind break son air flow, micro climates and crop yields[J]. Agro forestry Systems, 1998,(41):55-84. |
[16] | Brenner AJ, Jarvis PG, Beldt RJVD. Windbreak-crop interactions in the Sahel. 2. Growth response of millet in shelter. Agric For Meteorol, 1995, (75): 235-262. |
[17] | JUDD M, MCANENEY J. Shelterbelts and kiwifruit production[J]. ActaHortic, 1992,(297):255-262. |
[18] | 聂哲. 区域尺度农田防护林的气候效应及对农作物增产机制的研究[D]. 沈阳农业大学, 2020. |
NIE Zhe. Study on the Climate Effects of Farmland Shelterbelts at the Regional Scale and the Mechanism for Increasing Crop Yield[D]. Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. | |
[19] | SINGH H P, KOHLI R K, BATISH D R. Impact ofpopulusdeltoidesanddalbergiasissooshelterbelts on wheat:a comparative study[J]. Int Tree Crop J, 1999, 10(1):51-60. |
[20] | 孙国吉, 张金池, 王智, 等. 徐淮平原杨树林带的胁地规律.南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)[J], 27(4): 67-71. 2003. |
SUN Guoji, ZHANG Jinchi, WANG Zhi, et al. The threatened land law of the poplar forest belt in the Xuhuai Plain[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition)[J], 27(4): 67-71. 2003. | |
[21] | 王广钦, 樊巍. 农田林网内土壤水分变化动态的研究.河南农业大学学报[J], 22(3): 285-293. 1988. |
WANG Guang-qin, FAN Wei. Study on the dynamics of soil moisture changes in the farmland forest network[J]. Journal of Henan AgriculturalUniversity, 22(3): 285-293. 1988. | |
[22] | 刘锋, 甄世霞, 王佳河, 等. 民勤县林带边缘农作物减产因子探析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(18):5831-5832. |
LIU Feng, ZHEN Shixia, WANG Jiahe, et al. Analysis on the factors of crop yield reduction at the edge of forest belt in Minqin County[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(18):5831-5832. | |
[23] |
KOWALCHUK T E, DE JONG E. Shelterbelts and their effect on crop yield[J]. Can J Soil Sci, 1995, 75(4):543-550.
DOI URL |
[1] | LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, LI Na, XIN Huinan, BU Shengbing, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus uptake and utilization, and soil fertility of the extremely-late winter sown wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343. |
[2] | HOU Zhixiong, JING Changqing, CHEN Chen, WANG Gongxin, GUO Wenzhang, ZHAO Weikang. Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Coverage of Natural Grassland in Northern Xinjiang in Recent 20 Years and Its Relationship with Meteorological Factors [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 464-471. |
[3] | WANG Dongmei, PAN Hongsheng, LI Haiqiang, DING Ruifeng, Akedan Wuwaishi, LIU Jian, LI Haobin. Quantitatively Evaluate the Control Function of Predatory Natural Enemies on Cotton Aphids by DNA Molecular Detection Technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2661-2667. |
[4] | LI Xu, YUE Chunfang, ZHANG Mengli. Study on Significant Meteorological Factors of Evapotranspiration of Jujube Orchard under Drip Irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1704-1711. |
[5] | ZHANG Yang, MA Yingjie. Relationship Between Stem Flow Rate and Meteorological Factors in Different Growth Periods of Mature Grey Jujube [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(9): 1712-1722. |
[6] | ZHU Yuyong, ZHAO Bingmei, ZHANG Qiang, DING Lili, MA Jiangfeng, LI Xianchao, JIAN Ying, WANG Lin, WANG Xueyi, JIAO Wenkai. Preliminary Study of 4 Spray-adjuvants on The Reduction of Herbicide Application in Cotton Fields of Early Maturing Cotton Region in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(7): 1291-1296. |
[7] | MA Xiaomei,LI Baocheng,WANG Xin,ZHAO Suqin,LIU Yongchang, HAN Huanyong, ZHOU Xiaofeng, DONG Chengguang. Interaction Effects of Early-maturing Upland Cotton Varieties and Meteorological Factors on Cotton Fiber Quality [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(2): 216-226. |
[8] | WU Qiong, LIU Baojun, LI Hui, ZHAO Zhiqiang, LI Jing, GUO Qingyuan. Effects of Different Basal Fertilizer Levels on Cotton Seedling Growth and Cotton Yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 740-745. |
[9] | LAI Ning, CHEN Shu-huang, FU Yan-bo, HUANG Jian, GENG Qing-long. Soil Fertility Evaluation of Orchards in Southern of Xinjiang Based on GIS [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(8): 1476-1486. |
[10] | HE Hao, WEI Chang-zhou, LI Jun-hua, ZHANG Yu-tong. Effects of Commercial Organic Fertilizer Replacing Partial Chemical Fertilizer on Maize Growth,Yield and Soil Fertility [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(2): 325-332. |
[11] | ZHENG Wen-qiang, YUE Chun-fang, CAO Wei. Study on Diagnosis and prediction of Water Shortage of Mature Jujube in Aksu Based on Canopy-air Temperature Differential [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(12): 2256-2262. |
[12] | GAO Qiu-ling, WANG Zhen-lei, LIN Min-juan, WANG Jian-yu. Study on Seed Content and Fertility of Different Jujube Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(12): 2275-2281. |
[13] | GENG Qing-long, LI Na, LAI Ning, LI Ya-li, CHEN Shu-huang. Soil Fertility Evaluation for Orchard Soil Based on Improvement of Nemerow Index [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(11): 2104-2111. |
[14] | LI Xue-ling , LUO Yan-liang, LI Hui, XIE Xin, MA Ruo-han, LIU Yong-Jian, WANG Pei-ling, LU Yan-hui. Regulation and Control Effects of Suaeda Strips on the Population Occurrence of Hippomidia variegata in Cotton Fields [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(1): 13-22. |
[15] | Aziguli Abulizi, Aibibaimu Yiming, Sajidamu Aizezi, WANG Gan-cheng, Yasen Shali. Effects of Main Meteorological Factors on the Population Fluctuation of Loxostege sticticalis:Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)in Habahe County [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 55(3): 509-517. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||