Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 982-991.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.024
• Prataculture·Plant Protection·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian·Agricultural Eeconomy • Previous Articles Next Articles
FENG Fan(), XIE Kaiyun, Aibibula Yimamu, WAN Jiangchun()
Received:
2022-08-23
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
WAN Jiangchun (1987-), male, PhD, Associate professor, Research Direction: Feed processing and production, (E-mail)Supported by:
通讯作者:
万江春(1987-),男,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为饲草料加工与生产,(E-mail)作者简介:
封帆(1997-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为饲草加工与生产,(E-mail)Eric.feng2580@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
FENG Fan, XIE Kaiyun, Aibibula Yimamu, WAN Jiangchun. Effects of intercrop forages on weed control, soil and tree nutrients in orchards[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 982-991.
封帆, 谢开云, 艾比布拉·伊马木, 万江春. 果园生草对苹果园杂草控制、土壤养分及果树营养状况的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 982-991.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.024
测定指标 Index | 测定年际 Interannual | 处理 Treatment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
T | L | B | ||
杂草生物量 Weed biomass | 2017 | 913.93±29.64aC | 1 759.23±72.81aA | 1 414.97±33.54aB |
2018 | 624.93±167.65bC | 1 337.20±130.05bA | 956.03±62.36bB | |
2019 | 389.83±150.93cC | 881.77±57.75cA | 654.33±54.70cAB | |
牧草生物量 Forage biomass | 2017 | 2 044.80±50.04aC | 5 983.40±46.88aA | 5 068.40±71.96bAB |
2018 | 2 037.57±76.14aC | 5 938.23±49.14aA | 4 809.97±79.61bB | |
2019 | 2 109.17±107.62aC | 6 117.87±93.35aA | 5 768.67±68.48aAB | |
总生物量 Total biomass | 2017 | 2 958.73±48.06aC | 7 742.63±56.78aA | 6 483.36±43.52aB |
2018 | 2 662.50±79.21abC | 7 275.43±56.39bA | 5 766.62±69.58bB | |
2019 | 2 499.00±126.62bcC | 6 999.64±67.52cA | 6 423.24±58.76aAB |
Tab.1 The Aboveground biomass of forage and weeds in each experimental plot from 2017 to 2019(kg/hm2)
测定指标 Index | 测定年际 Interannual | 处理 Treatment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
T | L | B | ||
杂草生物量 Weed biomass | 2017 | 913.93±29.64aC | 1 759.23±72.81aA | 1 414.97±33.54aB |
2018 | 624.93±167.65bC | 1 337.20±130.05bA | 956.03±62.36bB | |
2019 | 389.83±150.93cC | 881.77±57.75cA | 654.33±54.70cAB | |
牧草生物量 Forage biomass | 2017 | 2 044.80±50.04aC | 5 983.40±46.88aA | 5 068.40±71.96bAB |
2018 | 2 037.57±76.14aC | 5 938.23±49.14aA | 4 809.97±79.61bB | |
2019 | 2 109.17±107.62aC | 6 117.87±93.35aA | 5 768.67±68.48aAB | |
总生物量 Total biomass | 2017 | 2 958.73±48.06aC | 7 742.63±56.78aA | 6 483.36±43.52aB |
2018 | 2 662.50±79.21abC | 7 275.43±56.39bA | 5 766.62±69.58bB | |
2019 | 2 499.00±126.62bcC | 6 999.64±67.52cA | 6 423.24±58.76aAB |
处理 Treatment | 含水量 Water content (%) | 容重 Bulk density (g/cm3) | pH |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 19.40±0.67c | 1.84±0.07a | 8.03±0.02a |
T | 25.43±0.41a | 1.55±0.04bc | 7.85±0.04b |
L | 25.07±0.19a | 1.65±0.03b | 7.77±0.04bc |
B | 22.60±0.78b | 1.47±0.03c | 7.70±0.01c |
Tab.2 Effects of different treatments on soil bulk density, water content and pH
处理 Treatment | 含水量 Water content (%) | 容重 Bulk density (g/cm3) | pH |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 19.40±0.67c | 1.84±0.07a | 8.03±0.02a |
T | 25.43±0.41a | 1.55±0.04bc | 7.85±0.04b |
L | 25.07±0.19a | 1.65±0.03b | 7.77±0.04bc |
B | 22.60±0.78b | 1.47±0.03c | 7.70±0.01c |
处理 Treatment | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkeline-N (mg/kg) | 速效磷 Olsen-P (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Olsen-K (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 11.07±0.34d | 54.63±0.80d | 13.80±0.15c | 150.57±1.19b |
T | 14.97±0.18c | 73.30±0.44c | 20.13±0.38b | 140.73±1.13c |
L | 18.60±0.32b | 81.93±1.13b | 24.93±0.90a | 151.27±1.23b |
B | 23.90±0.17a | 89.77±1.24a | 25.67±0.32a | 164.37±0.48a |
Tab.3 Effects of different treatments on soil organic matter and NPK available nutrients
处理 Treatment | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkeline-N (mg/kg) | 速效磷 Olsen-P (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Olsen-K (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 11.07±0.34d | 54.63±0.80d | 13.80±0.15c | 150.57±1.19b |
T | 14.97±0.18c | 73.30±0.44c | 20.13±0.38b | 140.73±1.13c |
L | 18.60±0.32b | 81.93±1.13b | 24.93±0.90a | 151.27±1.23b |
B | 23.90±0.17a | 89.77±1.24a | 25.67±0.32a | 164.37±0.48a |
处理 Treatment | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll (mg/g) | 氮 N (mg/g) | 磷 P (mg/g) | 钾 K (mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.66±0.05c | 18.53±0.46d | 3.56±0.05c | 3.55±0.05c |
T | 4.15±0.06a | 25.90±0.12c | 4.28±0.04b | 5.20±0.03b |
L | 3.22±0.05b | 27.97±1.00b | 4.59±0.01b | 3.44± 0.05c |
B | 3.24±0.02b | 30.77±0.48a | 5.60±0.25a | 7.21±0.95a |
Tab.4 Effects of different treatments on chlorophyll and N, P, K nutrients in fruit trees
处理 Treatment | 叶绿素 Chlorophyll (mg/g) | 氮 N (mg/g) | 磷 P (mg/g) | 钾 K (mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.66±0.05c | 18.53±0.46d | 3.56±0.05c | 3.55±0.05c |
T | 4.15±0.06a | 25.90±0.12c | 4.28±0.04b | 5.20±0.03b |
L | 3.22±0.05b | 27.97±1.00b | 4.59±0.01b | 3.44± 0.05c |
B | 3.24±0.02b | 30.77±0.48a | 5.60±0.25a | 7.21±0.95a |
处理 Treatment | 钙 Ca (mg/g) | 镁 Mg (mg/g) | 钠 Na (mg/g) | 铁 Fe (mg/g) | 锰 Mn (mg/g) | 铜 Cu (mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.24±0.04b | 0.31±0.02c | 1.26±0.05c | 2.12±0.04ab | 0.20±0.02b | 0.17±0.01b |
T | 1.96±0.07c | 0.83±0.04b | 1.73±0.05a | 2.03±0.05abc | 0.21±0.01b | 0.18±0.01b |
L | 2.24±0.08b | 0.79±0.02b | 1.49±0.13b | 1.94±0.05c | 0.18±0.02b | 0.19±0.01b |
B | 2.58±0.08a | 1.15±0.09a | 1.73±0.05a | 2.12±0.07a | 0.28±0.03a | 0.28±0.03a |
Tab.5 Trace element content of fruit trees in each test area
处理 Treatment | 钙 Ca (mg/g) | 镁 Mg (mg/g) | 钠 Na (mg/g) | 铁 Fe (mg/g) | 锰 Mn (mg/g) | 铜 Cu (mg/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.24±0.04b | 0.31±0.02c | 1.26±0.05c | 2.12±0.04ab | 0.20±0.02b | 0.17±0.01b |
T | 1.96±0.07c | 0.83±0.04b | 1.73±0.05a | 2.03±0.05abc | 0.21±0.01b | 0.18±0.01b |
L | 2.24±0.08b | 0.79±0.02b | 1.49±0.13b | 1.94±0.05c | 0.18±0.02b | 0.19±0.01b |
B | 2.58±0.08a | 1.15±0.09a | 1.73±0.05a | 2.12±0.07a | 0.28±0.03a | 0.28±0.03a |
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal components 1 | 主成分2 Principal components 2 | 主成分3 Principal components 3 |
---|---|---|---|
牧草生物量 Weed biomass(X1) | 0.339 | 0.784 | -0.510 |
杂草生物量 Forage biomass(X2) | 0.136 | 0.609 | -0.715 |
土壤含水量 Water content(X3) | 0.427 | -0.767 | -0.430 |
土壤容重 Soil bulk density(X4) | -0.830 | 0.394 | -0.107 |
土壤pH(X5) | -0.914 | 0.107 | 0.206 |
土壤有机质 Organic matter(X6) | 0.976 | 0.160 | -0.086 |
土壤碱解氮 Alkeline-N(X7) | 0.958 | -0.087 | -0.222 |
土壤速效磷 Olsen-P(X8) | 0.908 | -0.079 | -0.364 |
土壤速效钾 Olsen-K(X9) | 0.609 | 0.736 | 0.045 |
叶绿素 Chlorophyll(X10) | 0.308 | -0.928 | 0.139 |
N(X11) | 0.954 | -0.155 | -0.194 |
P(X12) | 0.991 | 0.095 | 0.007 |
K(X13) | 0.795 | -0.031 | 0.571 |
Ca(X14) | 0.574 | 0.760 | 0.097 |
Mg(X15) | 0.972 | -0.188 | 0.048 |
Na(X16) | 0.737 | -0.500 | 0.185 |
Fe(X17) | -0.041 | 0.415 | 0.748 |
Mn(X18) | 0.608 | 0.291 | 0.638 |
Cu(X19) | 0.782 | 0.348 | 0.306 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 10.325 | 4.456 | 2.691 |
初始特征方差贡献率 Initial characteristic variance contribution rate(%) | 54.340 | 23.451 | 14.161 |
因子旋转后方差 贡献率 Variance contribution rate after factor rotation (%) | 50.868 | 21.657 | 19.427 |
Tab.6 Principal component factor loading, eigenvalue and contribution rate
指标 Index | 主成分1 Principal components 1 | 主成分2 Principal components 2 | 主成分3 Principal components 3 |
---|---|---|---|
牧草生物量 Weed biomass(X1) | 0.339 | 0.784 | -0.510 |
杂草生物量 Forage biomass(X2) | 0.136 | 0.609 | -0.715 |
土壤含水量 Water content(X3) | 0.427 | -0.767 | -0.430 |
土壤容重 Soil bulk density(X4) | -0.830 | 0.394 | -0.107 |
土壤pH(X5) | -0.914 | 0.107 | 0.206 |
土壤有机质 Organic matter(X6) | 0.976 | 0.160 | -0.086 |
土壤碱解氮 Alkeline-N(X7) | 0.958 | -0.087 | -0.222 |
土壤速效磷 Olsen-P(X8) | 0.908 | -0.079 | -0.364 |
土壤速效钾 Olsen-K(X9) | 0.609 | 0.736 | 0.045 |
叶绿素 Chlorophyll(X10) | 0.308 | -0.928 | 0.139 |
N(X11) | 0.954 | -0.155 | -0.194 |
P(X12) | 0.991 | 0.095 | 0.007 |
K(X13) | 0.795 | -0.031 | 0.571 |
Ca(X14) | 0.574 | 0.760 | 0.097 |
Mg(X15) | 0.972 | -0.188 | 0.048 |
Na(X16) | 0.737 | -0.500 | 0.185 |
Fe(X17) | -0.041 | 0.415 | 0.748 |
Mn(X18) | 0.608 | 0.291 | 0.638 |
Cu(X19) | 0.782 | 0.348 | 0.306 |
特征值Eigenvalues | 10.325 | 4.456 | 2.691 |
初始特征方差贡献率 Initial characteristic variance contribution rate(%) | 54.340 | 23.451 | 14.161 |
因子旋转后方差 贡献率 Variance contribution rate after factor rotation (%) | 50.868 | 21.657 | 19.427 |
处理 Treatment | 主成分得分 Principal component score | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 综合得分 Composite scores | 排名 Rank | ||||
得分 Score | 排名 Rank | 得分 Score | 排名 Rank | 得分 Score | 排名 Rank | |||
CK | 18.84 | 4 | 19.91 | 2 | -6.312 | 1 | 12.67 | 4 |
T | 22.19 | 3 | 20.23 | 1 | -10.04 | 2 | 13.72 | 3 |
L | 24.42 | 2 | 18.13 | 4 | -11.89 | 4 | 14.04 | 2 |
B | 27.13 | 1 | 19.67 | 3 | -11.47 | 3 | 15.83 | 1 |
Tab.7 Principal component scores and comprehensive scores in various fields
处理 Treatment | 主成分得分 Principal component score | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 综合得分 Composite scores | 排名 Rank | ||||
得分 Score | 排名 Rank | 得分 Score | 排名 Rank | 得分 Score | 排名 Rank | |||
CK | 18.84 | 4 | 19.91 | 2 | -6.312 | 1 | 12.67 | 4 |
T | 22.19 | 3 | 20.23 | 1 | -10.04 | 2 | 13.72 | 3 |
L | 24.42 | 2 | 18.13 | 4 | -11.89 | 4 | 14.04 | 2 |
B | 27.13 | 1 | 19.67 | 3 | -11.47 | 3 | 15.83 | 1 |
[1] | 阿克苏统计年鉴委员会. 阿克苏统计年鉴[J].[2019-10-06]. http://www.yearbookchina.com. |
Aksu Statistical Yearbook Committee. Aksu Statistical Yearbook[J]. [2019-10-06]. http://www.yearbookchina.com. | |
[2] | 寇建村, 杨文权, 韩明玉, 等. 我国果园生草研究进展[J]. 草业科学, 2010, 27(7):154-159. |
KOU Jiancun, YANG Wenquan, HAN Minyu, et al. Research progress on interplanting grass in orchard in China[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(7): 154-159. | |
[3] | 孟林, 杨富裕. 果园生草及草地利用[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2016. |
MENG Lin, YANG Fuyu. Orchard Grass and Grassland Utilization[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2016. | |
[4] |
白岗栓, 郑锁林, 邹超煜, 等. 陇东旱塬果园生草对土壤水分及苹果树生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1):173-183.
DOI |
BAI Gangshuan, ZHENG Suolin, ZOU Chaoyu, et al. Influence of interplant herbage on soil moisture and apple tree growth in dry plateau of Eastern Gansu[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(1): 173-183. | |
[5] |
焦润安, 刘高顺, 闫士朋, 等. 生草栽培对白龙江干热河谷地带油橄榄园小气候的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3):770-780.
DOI |
JIAO Runan, LIU Gaoshun, YAN Shipeng, et al. Effect of sod-culture on the microclimate of olive orchard in Bailong River dry-hot valley region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(3): 770-780. | |
[6] | 朱先波, 潘亮, 王华玲, 等. 十堰猕猴桃果园生草生态效应的分析[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(3):381-388. |
ZHU Xianbo, PAN Liang, WANG Hualing, et al. Analysis of the ecological effects of grass-growing in kiwifruit orchards in Shiyan, China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020, 37(3): 381-388. | |
[7] | 井赵斌, 李腾飞, 龙明秀, 等. 生草对猕猴桃果园土壤酶活性和土壤微生物的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2020, 37(9):1710-1718. |
JING Zhaobin, LI Tengfei, LONG Mingxiu, et al. Effects of planted grasses on soil enzyme activities and microbial communities in a kiwifruit orchard[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(9): 1710-1718. | |
[8] | 陈海波, 李婷. 苹果树常见缺素症与防治[J]. 中国果菜, 2018, 38(6):57-59. |
CHEN Haibo, LI Ting. Symptoms and prevention techniques of element deficiency diseases in apple trees[J]. China Fruit and Vegetable, 2018, 38(6): 57-59. | |
[9] |
Zhang Q, Li X, Zhao M, et al. Lactic acid bacteria strains for enhancing the fermentation quality and aerobic stability ofLeymus chinensis silage[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 2016, 71(3): 472-481.
DOI URL |
[10] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. |
LU Rukun. Methods for Agricultural Chemical Analysis of Soils[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. | |
[11] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
BAO Shidan. Soil Agricultural Chemistry Analysis (3rd Ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000. | |
[12] |
Uddling J, Gelang-Alfredsson J, Piikki K, et al. Evaluating the relationship between leaf chlorophyll concentration and SPAD-502 chlorophyll meter readings[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 2007, 91(1): 37-46.
DOI PMID |
[13] | 中华人民共和国国家进出口商品检验局AOAC编译委员会编译. 公定分析方法(第十五版)[M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1991. |
China Nation Import and Export Commodity Inspection Bureau AOAC Translation Committee. Public Determination of Analytical Methods (15th Ed.)[M]. Beijing: Science and Technology of China Press, 1991. | |
[14] | 李晓刚, 邵明灿, 杨青松, 等. 梨园生草白三叶栽培对梨园杂草的抑制作用及其土壤理化性状的影响研究[J]. 上海农业科技, 2017,(2):106-107, 142. |
LI Xiaogang, SHAO Mingcan, YANG Qingsong, et al. Study on the inhibition effect of white clover cultivation on the weeds of pear orchard and the effects of soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(2): 106-107, 142. | |
[15] | 牛自勉, 李全, 王贤萍, 等. 生草覆盖果园有机质及矿物质的变化[J]. 山西农业科学, 1997, 25(2):61-64. |
NIU Zimian, LI Quan, WANG Xianping, et al. Changes of organic matter and mineral elements in the soil and leaves in weed mulching orchards[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 1997, 25(2): 61-64. | |
[16] | 谭学进, 穆兴民, 高鹏, 等. 黄土区植被恢复对土壤物理性质的影响[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(2):713-722. |
TAN Xuejin, MU Xingmin, GAO Peng, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration on changes to soil physical properties on the loess plateau[J]. China Environmental Science, 2019, 39(2): 713-722. | |
[17] | 张振境. 龙眼园生草栽培草种引种试种表现及对果园土壤的影响[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2018. |
ZHANG Zhenjing. Performance of several cover crops and their effects on soils in Longan orchards[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2018. | |
[18] |
毛培春, 孟林, 张国芳, 等. 白三叶对桃园小气候和桃品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2006, 14(4):360-364.
DOI |
MAO Peichun, MENG Lin, ZHANG Guofang, et al. Effect of planting white clover as a cover crop on the microclimate of a peach orchard and the peach quality[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2006, 14(4): 360-364. | |
[19] | 李国怀, 伊华林. 生草栽培对柑橘园土壤水分与有效养分及果实产量、品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(2):161-163. |
LI Guohuai, YI Hualin. Influences of sod culture on the soil water content, effect of soil nutrients, fruit yield and quality in citrus orchard[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(2): 161-163. | |
[20] | 康伟伟, 周晓康. 天水苹果产区苹果园套种白三叶草对果园的影响[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2015,(6):75-76. |
KANG Weiwei, ZHOU Xiaokang. Effect of white clover interplanting on apple orchard in Tianshui apple producing area[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2015, (6): 75-76. | |
[21] | 艾麦尔艾力·吐合提, 王冀川, 张迪, 等. 阿克苏地区果园套种油菜技术及其发展优势探讨[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2018, 41(8):20-21. |
Aimaieraili·Tuheti, WANG Jichuan, ZHANG Di, et al. Study on the technology of interplanting rapeseed in orchards in Aksu region and its development advantages[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2018, 41(8): 20-21. | |
[22] | 邢荔. 苹果园林间种草对果树光合蒸腾效率及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2019,(9):74-75. |
XING Li. Effects of planting grass in apple orchard on photosynthetic transpiration and water use efficiency of fruit trees[J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2019, (9): 74-75. | |
[23] |
TAN S, Crabtree G D. Competition between perennial ryegrass sod and Chardonnay wine grapes for mineral nutrients[J]. Hortscience, 1990, 25(5): 533-535.
DOI URL |
[24] | 任群, 肖家欣, 陈世林. 生草栽培对柑橘叶片矿质营养含量及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(24):407-409. |
REN Qun, XIAO Jiaxin, CHEN Shilin. Influences of sod culture on mineral nutrition in citrus leaves and fruit quality[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(24): 407-409.
DOI |
|
[25] | 李艳丽. 土壤管理方式对梨园土壤性状、梨树生长及果实品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012. |
LI Yanli. Effects of soil properties, pear tree growth, fruit quality by soil management method[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. |
[1] | XI Li, LI Siyao, XIA Xiaoying, CHEN Yuwen, LI Lin, WANG Jie, MA Xiaolong, Mierzhati Kenijialimu, Aliye Maimaiti, WANG Weixia. Study on soil nutrient characteristics of Picea schrenkiana var. Tianschanica forest with different canopy densities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2216-2222. |
[2] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[3] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[4] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[5] | LIU Min, JIN Juan, Abudoukayoumu Ayimaiti, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing, YANG Lei, ZHAO Xiaomei, GENG Wenjuan. Evaluation of cold resistance of three fresh edible jujube cultivars in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 916-924. |
[6] | CHENG Lihua, YANG Honglan, MA Qingqian, SHI Ying, ZHANG Dawei, Alisher A. Abdullaev, ZHANG Daoyuan. Physiological identification and analysis of Verticillium wilt resistance of 10 foreign cotton germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 992-1002. |
[7] | YANG ZHi, DONG Mengyi, WANG Zhenlei, YAN Fenfen, WU Cuiyun, WANG Jiurui, LIU Mengjun, LIN Minjuan. TPA Method was Used to Analyze the Texture and Split of F1 Fruit of Jujube Hybrid [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 608-615. |
[8] | GUO Yang, GUO Junxian, SHI Yong, LIU Li, FANG Wenyan, LIU Yancen. Prediction of SPAD Value in Melon Leaves by Characteristic Wavelength Screening Combined with PCA-LSSVM [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 616-623. |
[9] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[10] | CAO Yijie, SHI Zhiyong, Yusup Ablitip, Aisajan Mamat. Analysis of Amino Acid and Mineral Elements in the Rough-skinned Fruits of Korla Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 407-415. |
[11] | Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, ZHANG Yanhong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, DU Xiaojing, WANG Fengbin, LYU Yuping, Amanguli Aizizi. Screening and evaluation of aromatic rice varieties with high quality and high yield in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703. |
[12] | LYU Liangyu, FAN Guanghui, FU Quan, SU Caifeng, LI Fayi. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on growth and soil properties of Lycium barbarum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2779-2789. |
[13] | ZUO Xiaoxiao, YAN An, NING Songrui, YANG Li, SUN Meng, LU Qiancheng. Study on the effect of Bio-Organic fertilizer on promoting growth and increasing yield in saline alkali wheat field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2532-2540. |
[14] | SHI Xueping, ZHANG Qian, WANG Yan, DONG Ming, QI Hong, FENG Guoyi, SUN Hongchun, WANG Shulin. Effects of Manure Replacing Part Chemical Fertilizers on Soil Nutrient Contents, Cotton Yields and Returns of Fertilizer Inputs [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 192-196. |
[15] | YANG Minghua, WANG Qian, ZHOU Xinli, Aihemaitijiang Mahemuti, PEN Yuncheng, Aierjuma Tuluhan, Buayxam Namat, HOU Lili, LIU Qiang. Multiple Analysis on Character and Yield of Maize Hybrid Combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||