Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 25-31.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Cultivation Physiology · Germplasm Resources · Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
CUI Lei(), MA Tengfei, Halihashi Yibati, WANG Bin, SUN Chen, YANG Jinyu, QIAO Xiaoyan, HUI Guolong, WANG Jinxin()
Received:
2022-05-17
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2023-03-07
Correspondence author:
WANG Jinxin(1985-), male, native place: Linshu,Shandong province, associate researcher, Reserach filed: Crop nutrition and fertilization, (E-mail)wjxin345@sohu.com
Supported by:
崔磊(), 马腾飞, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 王斌, 孙晨, 杨金钰, 乔晓燕, 槐国龙, 王金鑫()
通讯作者:
王金鑫(1985-),男,山东临沭人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为作物营养与施肥,(E-mail)wjxin345@sohu.com
作者简介:
崔磊(1983-),男,陕西铜川人,助理研究员,研究方向为作物营养与施肥,(E-mail)47406097@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
CUI Lei, MA Tengfei, Halihashi Yibati, WANG Bin, SUN Chen, YANG Jinyu, QIAO Xiaoyan, HUI Guolong, WANG Jinxin. Effects of Acidifier Types and Dosage on Cotton Growth[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 25-31.
崔磊, 马腾飞, 哈丽哈什·依巴提, 王斌, 孙晨, 杨金钰, 乔晓燕, 槐国龙, 王金鑫. 滴施酸化剂种类及用量对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 25-31.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.004
生育期 Growth period | 播种期 Sowing date | 苗期 Seedling stage | 蕾期 Bud stage | 花期 Florescence | 铃期 Boll period | 吐絮期 Opening period | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灌溉日期(日/月) Irrigation date(D/M) | 18/4 | 8/6 | 18/6 | 26/6 | 3/7 | 11/7 | 18/7 | 26/7 | 4/8 | 14/8 | 24/8 |
灌溉量 Irrigation amount(m3/hm2) | 210 | 420 | 450 | 480 | 540 | 540 | 540 | 450 | 450 | 270 | 150 |
施氮量 Napplication rate(kg/hm2) | 30 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 42 | 45 | 45 | 39 | 27 | 6 | 0 |
Table 1 Irrigation period, irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate of cotton
生育期 Growth period | 播种期 Sowing date | 苗期 Seedling stage | 蕾期 Bud stage | 花期 Florescence | 铃期 Boll period | 吐絮期 Opening period | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灌溉日期(日/月) Irrigation date(D/M) | 18/4 | 8/6 | 18/6 | 26/6 | 3/7 | 11/7 | 18/7 | 26/7 | 4/8 | 14/8 | 24/8 |
灌溉量 Irrigation amount(m3/hm2) | 210 | 420 | 450 | 480 | 540 | 540 | 540 | 450 | 450 | 270 | 150 |
施氮量 Napplication rate(kg/hm2) | 30 | 12 | 24 | 30 | 42 | 45 | 45 | 39 | 27 | 6 | 0 |
处理 Treat- ment | 距滴头垂直方向距离 Distance from emitter in vertical direction (cm) | 距滴头水平方向距离 Distance from emitter in horizontal direction (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~10 | 10~20 | 20~30 | 0~5 | 5~10 | 10~15 | |
CK | 8.64 | 8.7 | 8.73 | 8.6 | 8.62 | 8.63 |
S1 | 8.52 | 8.66 | 8.7 | 8.52 | 8.65 | 8.64 |
S2 | 8.49 | 8.55 | 8.57 | 8.48 | 8.55 | 8.59 |
S3 | 8.32 | 8.44 | 8.48 | 8.25 | 8.54 | 8.49 |
C1 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.65 | 8.62 | 8.6 | 8.65 |
C2 | 8.51 | 8.55 | 8.6 | 8.58 | 8.46 | 8.59 |
C3 | 8.36 | 8.46 | 8.53 | 8.42 | 8.46 | 8.61 |
N1 | 8.62 | 8.63 | 8.68 | 8.63 | 8.63 | 8.65 |
N2 | 8.57 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.56 | 8.6 | 8.59 |
N3 | 8.46 | 8.5 | 8.55 | 8.42 | 8.45 | 8.58 |
Table 2 Effect of acidifier type and dosage on soil pH
处理 Treat- ment | 距滴头垂直方向距离 Distance from emitter in vertical direction (cm) | 距滴头水平方向距离 Distance from emitter in horizontal direction (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~10 | 10~20 | 20~30 | 0~5 | 5~10 | 10~15 | |
CK | 8.64 | 8.7 | 8.73 | 8.6 | 8.62 | 8.63 |
S1 | 8.52 | 8.66 | 8.7 | 8.52 | 8.65 | 8.64 |
S2 | 8.49 | 8.55 | 8.57 | 8.48 | 8.55 | 8.59 |
S3 | 8.32 | 8.44 | 8.48 | 8.25 | 8.54 | 8.49 |
C1 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.65 | 8.62 | 8.6 | 8.65 |
C2 | 8.51 | 8.55 | 8.6 | 8.58 | 8.46 | 8.59 |
C3 | 8.36 | 8.46 | 8.53 | 8.42 | 8.46 | 8.61 |
N1 | 8.62 | 8.63 | 8.68 | 8.63 | 8.63 | 8.65 |
N2 | 8.57 | 8.6 | 8.6 | 8.56 | 8.6 | 8.59 |
N3 | 8.46 | 8.5 | 8.55 | 8.42 | 8.45 | 8.58 |
处理 Treat- ment | 距滴头垂直方向距离 Distance from emitter in vertical direction (cm) | 距滴头水平方向距离 Distance from emitter in horizontal direction (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~10 | 10~20 | 20~30 | 0~5 | 5~10 | 10~15 | |
CK | 0.869 | 0.867 | 0.866 | 0.868 | 0.863 | 0.862 |
S1 | 0.865 | 0.864 | 0.863 | 0.872 | 0.862 | 0.865 |
S2 | 0.864 | 0.859 | 0.856 | 0.878 | 0.871 | 0.868 |
S3 | 0.868 | 0.875 | 0.872 | 0.864 | 0.877 | 0.868 |
C1 | 0.866 | 0.867 | 0.86 | 0.866 | 0.869 | 0.86 |
C2 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.868 | 0.864 | 0.868 | 0.868 |
C3 | 0.856 | 0.871 | 0.875 | 0.852 | 0.868 | 0.87 |
N1 | 0.854 | 0.863 | 0.853 | 0.859 | 0.862 | 0.865 |
N2 | 0.869 | 0.854 | 0.871 | 0.856 | 0.864 | 0.868 |
N3 | 0.877 | 0.865 | 0.866 | 0.869 | 0.868 | 0.866 |
Table 3 Effects of acidifier types and dosage on soil available zinc (mg/kg)
处理 Treat- ment | 距滴头垂直方向距离 Distance from emitter in vertical direction (cm) | 距滴头水平方向距离 Distance from emitter in horizontal direction (cm) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~10 | 10~20 | 20~30 | 0~5 | 5~10 | 10~15 | |
CK | 0.869 | 0.867 | 0.866 | 0.868 | 0.863 | 0.862 |
S1 | 0.865 | 0.864 | 0.863 | 0.872 | 0.862 | 0.865 |
S2 | 0.864 | 0.859 | 0.856 | 0.878 | 0.871 | 0.868 |
S3 | 0.868 | 0.875 | 0.872 | 0.864 | 0.877 | 0.868 |
C1 | 0.866 | 0.867 | 0.86 | 0.866 | 0.869 | 0.86 |
C2 | 0.854 | 0.854 | 0.868 | 0.864 | 0.868 | 0.868 |
C3 | 0.856 | 0.871 | 0.875 | 0.852 | 0.868 | 0.87 |
N1 | 0.854 | 0.863 | 0.853 | 0.859 | 0.862 | 0.865 |
N2 | 0.869 | 0.854 | 0.871 | 0.856 | 0.864 | 0.868 |
N3 | 0.877 | 0.865 | 0.866 | 0.869 | 0.868 | 0.866 |
处理 Treat- ment | 单株 结铃数 Boll numbers per plant (个) | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 株数 Number of cotton (104株/ hm2) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Yield increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.0e | 4.78 | 14.3 | 4 780 | — |
S1 | 7.4cd | 4.97 | 14.7 | 5 407b | 13.1 |
S2 | 8.4ab | 4.89 | 13.2 | 5 441b | 13.8 |
S3 | 8.7a | 4.98 | 13.0 | 5 637a | 17.9 |
C1 | 8.0b | 4.82 | 13.2 | 5 077d | 6.2 |
C2 | 7.6c | 4.96 | 13.3 | 5 056d | 5.8 |
C3 | 7.2d | 5.13 | 14.3 | 5 256bc | 10.0 |
N1 | 7.9b | 4.82 | 14.2 | 5 370b | 12.4 |
N2 | 7.9b | 4.89 | 13.8 | 5 328bc | 11.5 |
N3 | 8.0b | 4.80 | 14.0 | 5 383b | 12.6 |
Table 4 Effects of acidifier types and dosage on cotton yield components
处理 Treat- ment | 单株 结铃数 Boll numbers per plant (个) | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 株数 Number of cotton (104株/ hm2) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Yield increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.0e | 4.78 | 14.3 | 4 780 | — |
S1 | 7.4cd | 4.97 | 14.7 | 5 407b | 13.1 |
S2 | 8.4ab | 4.89 | 13.2 | 5 441b | 13.8 |
S3 | 8.7a | 4.98 | 13.0 | 5 637a | 17.9 |
C1 | 8.0b | 4.82 | 13.2 | 5 077d | 6.2 |
C2 | 7.6c | 4.96 | 13.3 | 5 056d | 5.8 |
C3 | 7.2d | 5.13 | 14.3 | 5 256bc | 10.0 |
N1 | 7.9b | 4.82 | 14.2 | 5 370b | 12.4 |
N2 | 7.9b | 4.89 | 13.8 | 5 328bc | 11.5 |
N3 | 8.0b | 4.80 | 14.0 | 5 383b | 12.6 |
处理 Treat- ment | 纤维长度 LEN (mm) | 整齐度 UN (%) | 马克隆值 MIC | 伸长率 ELG (%) | 比强度 STR (cN/tex) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 28.06 | 84.53 | 5.00 | 6.79 | 27.02 |
S1 | 27.60 | 84.10 | 4.91 | 6.87 | 26.96 |
S2 | 29.04 | 83.65 | 4.79 | 6.97 | 28.04 |
S3 | 29.42 | 80.74 | 4.95 | 6.75 | 28.57 |
C1 | 28.58 | 83.77 | 4.95 | 6.85 | 26.26 |
C2 | 28.95 | 83.66 | 4.89 | 6.77 | 26.89 |
C3 | 29.36 | 83.65 | 4.88 | 6.97 | 27.54 |
N1 | 27.89 | 83.84 | 4.99 | 6.66 | 27.19 |
N2 | 28.54 | 83.79 | 4.91 | 6.87 | 28.06 |
N3 | 28.98 | 81.56 | 4.85 | 6.83 | 28.84 |
Table 5 Effects of acidifier types and dosage on cotton quality
处理 Treat- ment | 纤维长度 LEN (mm) | 整齐度 UN (%) | 马克隆值 MIC | 伸长率 ELG (%) | 比强度 STR (cN/tex) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 28.06 | 84.53 | 5.00 | 6.79 | 27.02 |
S1 | 27.60 | 84.10 | 4.91 | 6.87 | 26.96 |
S2 | 29.04 | 83.65 | 4.79 | 6.97 | 28.04 |
S3 | 29.42 | 80.74 | 4.95 | 6.75 | 28.57 |
C1 | 28.58 | 83.77 | 4.95 | 6.85 | 26.26 |
C2 | 28.95 | 83.66 | 4.89 | 6.77 | 26.89 |
C3 | 29.36 | 83.65 | 4.88 | 6.97 | 27.54 |
N1 | 27.89 | 83.84 | 4.99 | 6.66 | 27.19 |
N2 | 28.54 | 83.79 | 4.91 | 6.87 | 28.06 |
N3 | 28.98 | 81.56 | 4.85 | 6.83 | 28.84 |
[1] | 曹秀华, 曲东. 土壤养分活化途径的探讨[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1998, 16(4): 9-14. |
CAO Xiuhua, QU Dong. A Method Study of Activating Potential Nutrient Components in Soil[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1998, 16(4): 9-14. | |
[2] | 钱金红, 谢振翅. 碳酸盐对土壤锌解吸影响的研究[J]. 土壤学报, 1994, 31(1): 105-108. |
QIAN Jinhong, XIE Zhenchi. Effect of Carbonate on Desorption of Soil Zinc[J]. Acta Pedologica sinica, 1994, 31(1): 105-108. | |
[3] |
Benítez M., Pedrajas V., Del Campillo M., et al. Iron chlorosis in olive in relation to soil properties[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2002, 62(1): 47-52.
DOI URL |
[4] | Yuan S.H. Effect of Zn Adsorption on Charge of Variable Charge Soils[J]. Pedosphere, 1993, 3(3): 239-246. |
[5] | 张凌云, 张宪法, 翟衡. 土壤因子对植物缺铁失绿的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2002, 33(1): 74-77. |
ZHANG Lingyun, ZHANG Xianfa, ZHAI Heng. Effects of Soil Factors on Plant Chlorosis Due to Iron Deficit[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2002, 33(1): 74-77. | |
[6] |
Khorsandi F. Sulfuric acid effects on iron and phosphorus availability in two calcareous soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1994, 17(9): 1611-1623.
DOI URL |
[7] | 李燕婷, 白灯莎·买买提艾力, 张福锁, 等. 酸性根际肥对石灰性土壤pH和铁有效性的影响研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(3): 312-316. |
LI Yanting, Baidengsha Maimaitiaili, Zhang Fusuo, et al. Effect of acidic rhizosphere fertilizer on the soil pH and Fe availability of calcareous soil[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2003, 9(3): 312-316. | |
[8] |
Thomson C., Marschner H., Römheld V. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer form on p H of the bulk soil and rhizosphere, and on the growth, phosphorus, and micronutrient uptake of bean[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 1993, 16(3): 493-506.
DOI URL |
[9] | 杨绍琼, 党廷辉, 戚瑞生, 等. 低分子量有机酸对不同肥力土壤磷素的活化作用[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(4): 60-64. |
YANG Shaoqiong, DANG Tinghui, QI Ruisheng, et al. Activation of organic acids on phosphorus of soil with different fertility[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2012, 30(4): 60-64. | |
[10] | 龚松贵, 王兴祥, 张桃林, 等. 低分子量有机酸对红壤无机磷活化的作用[J]. 土壤学报, 2010, 47(4): 692-697. |
GONG Songgui, WANG Xingxiang, ZHANG Taolin, et al. Release of inorganic phosphorus from red soils induced by low molecular weight organic acids[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2010, 47(4): 692-697. | |
[11] | 赵红华, 危常州, 侯建伟, 等. 滴灌下酸性物质对石灰性土壤磷有效性及作物吸收的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(5): 847-852. |
ZHAO Honghua, WEI Changzhou, HOU Jianwei, et al. Acidic Materials on Mobilization of Phosphorus in Calcareous Soil and Its impact on Phosphorus Uptake of Drip-irrigated Cotton[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(5): 847-852. | |
[12] | 王金鑫, 危常州, 王肖娟, 等. 新疆石灰性土壤锌有效性及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2012, 26(6): 297-304. |
WANG Jinxin, WEI Changzhou, WANG Xiaojuan, et al. Zinc Availability and Its Influencing Factors of Xinjiang Calcareous Soil[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2012, 26(6): 297-304. | |
[13] | 赵红华. 滴灌条件下土壤酸化对石灰性土壤磷锌有效性影响及其生物效应[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2015. |
ZHAO Honghua. ffects of soil acidification under drip irrigation on soil P and Zn availability at calcareous soil and its biological effects[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2015. | |
[14] |
张书捷, 张新疆, 王娟, 等. 施用土壤酸化剂和调整播期防治膜下滴灌水稻苗期缺铁黄化的效果研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(5): 519-527.
DOI |
ZHANG Shujie, ZHANG Xinjiang, WANG Juan, et al. Applying soil acidification agents and adjusting sowing date to deal with rice chlorosis in seedling stage caused by iron ddficiency under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching[J]. Chin J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(5): 519-527.
DOI |
|
[15] |
Jing JY, Rui YK, Zhang FD, et al. Localized application of phosphorus and ammonium improves growth of maize seedlings by stimulating root proliferation and rhizosphere acidification[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 119(2): 355-364.
DOI URL |
[16] | 刘涛, 梁永超, 褚贵新, 等. 三种硝化抑制剂在石灰性土壤中的应用效果比较[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(5): 758-762. |
LIU Tao, LIANG Yongchao, CHU Guixin, et al. Effect Comparison of Three Different Types of Nitrification Inhibitors (DCD, DMPP and Nitrapyrin) in Calcareous Soils[J]. Soil, 2011, 43(5): 758-762. | |
[17] |
Freney J, Chen D, Mosier A, et al. Use of nitrification inhibitors to increase fertilizer nitrogen recovery and lint yield in irrigated cotton[J]. Fertilizer Research, 1993, 34(1): 37-44.
DOI URL |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[3] | WANG Hui, GUO Jincheng, SONG Jia, ZHANG Tingjun, He Liangrong. Physiological and biochemical analysis of transgenic offspring of upland cotton GhCIPK6 under high temperature Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119. |
[4] | YANG Chuan, ZHANG Kai, CHEN Bing, ZHANG Hui, LIU Ping, CHANG Song, SHENG Jiandong. Responses of morphological characteristics of cotton to different water conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127. |
[5] | ZHU Yujie, LIN Ling, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Effect of modified cotton straw charcoal on ammonia volatilization characteristics of nitrogen fertilizer in grey desert soils of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2128-2137. |
[6] | YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[7] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[8] | LI Xueling, GUO Junxian, CHEN Li, SONG Heling, ZHANG Zhong. Effects of Different Film Mulching Width on Cotton Farmland Environment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847. |
[9] | YANG Ni, Mayila Yusuyin, YANG Yanlong, LI Chunping, ZHANG Dawei, XU Haijiang, LAI Chengxia. Comparative analysis of plant volatiles from the Verticillium-Infected withered spot and etiolated leaves in cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986. |
[10] | Mierzhati Mutalifu, SHI Xiunan, BO Junbing, Zubaidai Abudukerimu, Wulejialehasi Azhati, SHI Shubing. Effects of different delinting modes on seed vigor and seedling characteristics of cotton under PEG stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568. |
[11] | DUAN Songjiang, PENG Zengying, SHEN Yingying, Mulidier Baibolati, WU Yifan, CUI jianping, ZHANG Jusong. Responses of seed cotton yield and fiber quality of different sea island cotton varieties to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579. |
[12] | LIN Ling, ZHU Yujie, FENG Lei, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Features of aged cotton stalk charcoal and its effect on ammonia volatilization from sand soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1580-1588. |
[13] | XUE Zhengxuan, CAI Zhiping, ZHANG Zhijian, PENG Tianxiang, HUANG Zhiwei, HUANG Enze, WANG Peiling, LU Yanhui. Transfer of Hippodamia variegate between licorice and cotton fields based on rubidium marker technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1741-1747. |
[14] | JIANG Zhu, ZHANG Jianghui, BAI Yungang, YANG Pengnian, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, LIU Xuhui. Effects of fertilizer and salt regulation on cotton growth and yield under plastic film drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397. |
[15] | WANG Wentao, WU Bo, TAI Hongzhong, LIAN Wenming, DAI Cuirong, LI Shuangjiang, PU Yanmei. Effects of different sowing dates on cotton growth in aral reclamation area, Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1413-1422. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||