Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (6): 1438-1449.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.015
• Soil Fertilizer·Horiculural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Procssing·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Xiao(), GUO Dongliang, LI Gongze, XUE Min, JIANG Haixia, YE Jiali, XIE Liqiong()
Received:
2021-10-11
Online:
2022-06-20
Published:
2022-07-07
Correspondence author:
XIE Liqiong
Supported by:
李枭(), 郭栋良, 李恭泽, 薛敏, 江海霞, 叶佳丽, 谢丽琼()
通讯作者:
谢丽琼
作者简介:
李枭(1996-),男,甘肃酒泉人,硕士研究生,研究方向为亚麻分子育种,(E-mail) 473982387@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Xiao, GUO Dongliang, LI Gongze, XUE Min, JIANG Haixia, YE Jiali, XIE Liqiong. Optimization of Salt Tolerance Identification System at Germination Stage of Flax and Comprehensive Assessment of Salt Tolerance of 150 Germplasms[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449.
李枭, 郭栋良, 李恭泽, 薛敏, 江海霞, 叶佳丽, 谢丽琼. 亚麻萌发期耐盐鉴定体系优化及150份种质耐盐性综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(6): 1438-1449.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.06.015
Fig.1 The growth of two flax germplasm Olayozon and Line 629-01 under the stress of different concentrations of NaCl solution after germination for 7 days(bar=1cm)
处理浓度 (mmol/L) | 鉴定指标 Indicators | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 全距 Range | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Std. | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | RSL | 1.60 | 0.40 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 0.27 | 33.52 |
RRL | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.12 | 16.94 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.92 | 0.17 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 4.30 | |
75 | RSL | 1.21 | 0.15 | 1.06 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 50.26 |
RRL | 0.74 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 39.48 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.85 | 0.24 | 0.99 | 0.05 | 5.34 | |
100 | RSL | 0.94 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 60.73 |
RRL | 0.70 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 70.59 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.90 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 4.94 | |
125 | RSL | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 51.85 |
RRL | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 57.06 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.80 | 0.29 | 0.96 | 0.07 | 7.15 | |
150 | RSL | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 52.40 |
RRL | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 44.43 | |
RGR | 1.04 | 0.66 | 0.38 | 0.95 | 0.08 | 8.44 | |
175 | RSL | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 34.59 |
RRL | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 29.31 | |
RGR | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 21.66 | |
200 | RGR | 1.02 | 0.13 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.21 | 27.71 |
210 | RGR | 0.98 | 0.06 | 0.92 | 0.54 | 0.26 | 48.20 |
220 | RGR | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 58.55 |
230 | RGR | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 75.50 |
240 | RGR | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 114.85 |
250 | RGR | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 191.57 |
Table 1 Salt tolerant coefficient of each single index of 30 flax germplasm during germination under different concentrations salt stress
处理浓度 (mmol/L) | 鉴定指标 Indicators | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 全距 Range | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Std. | 变异系数 CV(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50 | RSL | 1.60 | 0.40 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 0.27 | 33.52 |
RRL | 1.00 | 0.36 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.12 | 16.94 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.92 | 0.17 | 1.00 | 0.04 | 4.30 | |
75 | RSL | 1.21 | 0.15 | 1.06 | 0.48 | 0.24 | 50.26 |
RRL | 0.74 | 0.17 | 0.57 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 39.48 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.85 | 0.24 | 0.99 | 0.05 | 5.34 | |
100 | RSL | 0.94 | 0.11 | 0.83 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 60.73 |
RRL | 0.70 | 0.07 | 0.63 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 70.59 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.90 | 0.19 | 1.00 | 0.05 | 4.94 | |
125 | RSL | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.37 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 51.85 |
RRL | 0.28 | 0.04 | 0.24 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 57.06 | |
RGR | 1.09 | 0.80 | 0.29 | 0.96 | 0.07 | 7.15 | |
150 | RSL | 0.32 | 0.03 | 0.28 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 52.40 |
RRL | 0.14 | 0.03 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 44.43 | |
RGR | 1.04 | 0.66 | 0.38 | 0.95 | 0.08 | 8.44 | |
175 | RSL | 0.12 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 34.59 |
RRL | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 29.31 | |
RGR | 1.00 | 0.24 | 0.76 | 0.81 | 0.18 | 21.66 | |
200 | RGR | 1.02 | 0.13 | 0.89 | 0.75 | 0.21 | 27.71 |
210 | RGR | 0.98 | 0.06 | 0.92 | 0.54 | 0.26 | 48.20 |
220 | RGR | 0.90 | 0.00 | 0.90 | 0.40 | 0.23 | 58.55 |
230 | RGR | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 0.29 | 0.22 | 75.50 |
240 | RGR | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 114.85 |
250 | RGR | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.78 | 0.08 | 0.15 | 191.57 |
Fig.2 The indexchangesof 30 flax germplasm accessions under salt stress of different concentrations Note: In the boxplot, the top and the bottom line, respectively the data of the maximum and the minimum, which the boxplot above and below the line, respectively the third quartile and first quartile, the line segments in the middle of the boxplot represent the median of the data.In addition, the black dots at the top and bottom represent the extremes in the sample data, respectively.The orange dots represent the coefficient of variation (CV).The same as below
鉴定指标 Identification index | 对照 Control | 处理Treatment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Std. | 变异系数 CV(%) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Std. | 变异系数 CV(%) | |
SL(mm) | 56.83 | 15.22 | 40.32 | 7.66 | 19.01 | 22.47 | 1.48 | 7.42 | 3.79 | 51.13 |
RL(mm) | 93.83 | 29.33 | 66.37 | 12.11 | 18.25 | 37.47 | 2.15 | 12.86 | 6.71 | 52.14 |
GR(%) | 100.00 | 44.00 | 91.96 | 7.17 | 7.79 | 90.00 | 2.00 | 56.03 | 22.16 | 39.56 |
Table 2 Variation analysis of 150 flax germplasm under salt stress and control conditions
鉴定指标 Identification index | 对照 Control | 处理Treatment | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Std. | 变异系数 CV(%) | 最大值 Max | 最小值 Min | 平均值 Average | 标准差 Std. | 变异系数 CV(%) | |
SL(mm) | 56.83 | 15.22 | 40.32 | 7.66 | 19.01 | 22.47 | 1.48 | 7.42 | 3.79 | 51.13 |
RL(mm) | 93.83 | 29.33 | 66.37 | 12.11 | 18.25 | 37.47 | 2.15 | 12.86 | 6.71 | 52.14 |
GR(%) | 100.00 | 44.00 | 91.96 | 7.17 | 7.79 | 90.00 | 2.00 | 56.03 | 22.16 | 39.56 |
项目Item | RSL | RRL | RGR | μ(RSL) | μ(RRL) | μ(RGR) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值Min | 0.036 1 | 0.039 4 | 0.027 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 |
最大值Max | 0.615 7 | 0.601 0 | 0.954 5 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
平均值Average | 0.190 5 | 0.197 5 | 0.606 6 | 0.266 5 | 0.281 5 | 0.624 8 |
标准差Std. | 0.098 4 | 0.103 2 | 0.230 1 | 0.169 7 | 0.183 8 | 0.248 1 |
变异系数 CV | 0.516 3 | 0.522 8 | 0.379 4 | 0.636 9 | 0.653 1 | 0.397 1 |
权重 Weight | - | - | - | 0.364 0 | 0.368 6 | 0.267 5 |
Table 3 Salt tolerance coefficient and membership function values based on different identification indices
项目Item | RSL | RRL | RGR | μ(RSL) | μ(RRL) | μ(RGR) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
最小值Min | 0.036 1 | 0.039 4 | 0.027 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 | 0.000 0 |
最大值Max | 0.615 7 | 0.601 0 | 0.954 5 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 | 1.000 0 |
平均值Average | 0.190 5 | 0.197 5 | 0.606 6 | 0.266 5 | 0.281 5 | 0.624 8 |
标准差Std. | 0.098 4 | 0.103 2 | 0.230 1 | 0.169 7 | 0.183 8 | 0.248 1 |
变异系数 CV | 0.516 3 | 0.522 8 | 0.379 4 | 0.636 9 | 0.653 1 | 0.397 1 |
权重 Weight | - | - | - | 0.364 0 | 0.368 6 | 0.267 5 |
项目 Item | μ(RSL) | μ(RRL) | μ(RGR) |
---|---|---|---|
μ(RRL) | 0.910*** | ||
μ(RGR) | 0.193* | 0.238** | |
D value | 0.876*** | 0.899*** | 0.608*** |
Table 4 Correlation analysis ofeach index membership function value and D value
项目 Item | μ(RSL) | μ(RRL) | μ(RGR) |
---|---|---|---|
μ(RRL) | 0.910*** | ||
μ(RGR) | 0.193* | 0.238** | |
D value | 0.876*** | 0.899*** | 0.608*** |
耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ALSEE | 0.956 7 | 高耐 | 51 | noname | 0.410 8 | 中耐 | 101 | Verchnevolzhkij | 0.313 4 | 中耐 | ||||||||
2 | OLEIFERA | 0.787 6 | 高耐 | 52 | Novelty | 0.410 3 | 中耐 | 102 | Line 657-01 | 0.307 3 | 中耐 | ||||||||
3 | CIli 2038 | 0.775 9 | 高耐 | 53 | L-60016-3-87 | 0.406 7 | 中耐 | 103 | VNIIL-742 | 0.302 3 | 中耐 | ||||||||
4 | VNIIL-180 | 0.668 1 | 耐盐 | 54 | ROYAL | 0.404 0 | 中耐 | 104 | Domtar Selection | 0.302 0 | 中耐 | ||||||||
5 | 谢列波 | 0.664 2 | 耐盐 | 55 | HINDI | 0.400 4 | 中耐 | 105 | VNIIL-1104 | 0.299 7 | 中耐 | ||||||||
6 | 1270 | 0.638 1 | 耐盐 | 56 | Argos | 0.399 8 | 中耐 | 106 | No. Dak. No. 40,013 | 0.297 9 | 中耐 | ||||||||
7 | CIli 2047 | 0.635 2 | 耐盐 | 57 | Mures | 0.396 7 | 中耐 | 107 | Marina | 0.290 0 | 敏感 | ||||||||
8 | MESSENIAS | 0.611 8 | 耐盐 | 58 | Linota | 0.395 8 | 中耐 | 108 | L-1120 | 0.282 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
9 | VNIIL-409 | 0.603 2 | 耐盐 | 59 | RIJKI | 0.394 6 | 中耐 | 109 | CIli 1617 | 0.279 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
10 | BELADI Y 6903 | 0.601 8 | 耐盐 | 60 | CIli 452 | 0.390 6 | 中耐 | 110 | Laura | 0.277 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
11 | CIli 642 | 0.598 7 | 耐盐 | 61 | Evelin | 0.389 0 | 中耐 | 111 | Hollandia | 0.273 8 | 敏感 | ||||||||
12 | Torzhokij 4 | 0.598 7 | 耐盐 | 62 | RABA 0189 | 0.387 5 | 中耐 | 112 | Z 11637 | 0.272 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
13 | CIli 1919 | 0.595 5 | 耐盐 | 63 | Q9903 | 0.387 3 | 中耐 | 113 | CDC Bethune-14 | 0.269 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
14 | 62/125-4 | 0.594 4 | 耐盐 | 64 | Tammes Type 12 | 0.386 2 | 中耐 | 114 | CYPRUS | 0.266 0 | 敏感 | ||||||||
15 | Crepitam Tabor | 0.593 5 | 耐盐 | 65 | Buda 80 | 0.385 5 | 中耐 | 115 | L-41 | 0.265 8 | 敏感 | ||||||||
16 | MINVANO | 0.590 1 | 耐盐 | 66 | CIli 897 | 0.379 9 | 中耐 | 116 | Tammes Type 5 | 0.260 9 | 敏感 | ||||||||
17 | VNIIL-918 | 0.577 2 | 耐盐 | 67 | CIli 1407 | 0.375 8 | 中耐 | 117 | Svetoch mutation | 0.255 9 | 敏感 | ||||||||
18 | BENVENUTO REAL | 0.573 1 | 耐盐 | 68 | Tajga | 0.375 1 | 中耐 | 118 | VNIIL-776 | 0.254 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
19 | VNIIL-725 | 0.541 1 | 耐盐 | 69 | 411704 Fiber | 0.373 4 | 中耐 | 119 | China 4 | 0.252 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
20 | Olayozon | 0.533 5 | 耐盐 | 70 | Q0415 | 0.371 2 | 中耐 | 120 | CIli 946 | 0.248 5 | 敏感 | ||||||||
21 | TIMBU | 0.527 8 | 耐盐 | 71 | VNIIL-6148 | 0.370 2 | 中耐 | 121 | Ariane | 0.242 6 | 敏感 | ||||||||
22 | VNIIL-3531 | 0.526 9 | 耐盐 | 72 | Sel. 176 x (19 x 112) | 0.369 0 | 中耐 | 122 | G 2063-5-10 | 0.242 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
23 | CIli 1490 | 0.525 5 | 耐盐 | 73 | ARANDAS | 0.368 7 | 中耐 | 123 | AR-2 | 0.239 3 | 敏感 | ||||||||
24 | Sel. C.I. 19-47 Pale Blue | 0.513 3 | 耐盐 | 74 | Tverta | 0.366 3 | 中耐 | 124 | VNIIL-5520 | 0.234 6 | 敏感 | ||||||||
25 | CIli 1525 | 0.510 2 | 耐盐 | 75 | L-140-16 | 0.364 2 | 中耐 | 125 | MARTIN | 0.225 9 | 敏感 | ||||||||
耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | ||||||||
26 | CIli 1749 | 0.497 0 | 耐盐 | 76 | L-8709-5-10 | 0.364 1 | 中耐 | 126 | China 2 | 0.213 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
27 | R-111 | 0.495 8 | 耐盐 | 77 | Common | 0.357 6 | 中耐 | 127 | Noralta | 0.208 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
28 | de metcha 1-3-6 Vilm | 0.488 5 | 耐盐 | 78 | CULBERT M3P3 | 0.355 7 | 中耐 | 128 | BETA 201 | 0.204 3 | 敏感 | ||||||||
29 | TR 35141 | 0.486 3 | 耐盐 | 79 | CIli 1679 | 0.347 9 | 中耐 | 129 | A-93 | 0.201 6 | 敏感 | ||||||||
30 | TOMAGAON | 0.484 9 | 耐盐 | 80 | Belinka | 0.346 1 | 中耐 | 130 | Sel. of Minn. 281 | 0.200 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
31 | VNIIL-492 | 0.484 5 | 耐盐 | 81 | Natasja | 0.345 5 | 中耐 | 131 | China 1 | 0.197 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
32 | URUGUAY 36/48 | 0.483 4 | 耐盐 | 82 | Atlas (fiber) | 0.344 2 | 中耐 | 132 | Belochka | 0.197 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
33 | Atalante | 0.483 1 | 耐盐 | 83 | Macbeth | 0.344 1 | 中耐 | 133 | UNRYU | 0.197 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
34 | LINAZA | 0.478 7 | 耐盐 | 84 | Mapun | 0.339 4 | 中耐 | 134 | VNIIL-519 | 0.189 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
35 | 41 | 0.477 5 | 耐盐 | 85 | MALABRIGO 1.7 | 0.339 2 | 中耐 | 135 | Artemida | 0.184 8 | 敏感 | ||||||||
36 | Pskovski 2976 | 0.473 4 | 耐盐 | 86 | CONCURRENT | 0.339 0 | 中耐 | 136 | Line 548-01 | 0.179 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
37 | REDSON | 0.470 8 | 耐盐 | 87 | Sel. of N.D.R. 114 | 0.338 7 | 中耐 | 137 | Escalina | 0.170 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
38 | 38 | 0.458 9 | 耐盐 | 88 | CIli 908 | 0.336 7 | 中耐 | 138 | Line 629-01 | 0.164 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
39 | NOVA ROSSISK SELECTI | 0.457 1 | 耐盐 | 89 | Tammes Type 2 | 0.335 7 | 中耐 | 139 | DIADEM | 0.156 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
40 | CIli 1464 | 0.438 9 | 中耐 | 90 | G-1847-4-1 | 0.333 2 | 中耐 | 140 | 阿卡塔 | 0.131 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
41 | K-y | 0.437 0 | 中耐 | 91 | CIli 1924 | 0.331 8 | 中耐 | 141 | K-1339 | 0.122 8 | 高敏 | ||||||||
42 | Novotorzhskij | 0.436 9 | 中耐 | 92 | QUERANDI | 0.328 3 | 中耐 | 142 | Diane | 0.122 2 | 高敏 | ||||||||
43 | Concurent | 0.434 5 | 中耐 | 93 | Peynau | 0.327 4 | 中耐 | 143 | Hermes | 0.108 2 | 高敏 | ||||||||
44 | Lusatia | 0.432 6 | 中耐 | 94 | Sagino | 0.325 5 | 中耐 | 144 | Korostenskij 3 | 0.103 6 | 高敏 | ||||||||
45 | Erythree | 0.428 1 | 中耐 | 95 | TAMMES TYPE 12 | 0.324 8 | 中耐 | 145 | L-500004-2-84 | 0.100 8 | 高敏 | ||||||||
46 | RECOLTE NO 0196 | 0.427 8 | 中耐 | 96 | China 6 | 0.322 4 | 中耐 | 146 | L. 270-68 | 0.073 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
47 | Res. x Hoshangabad (C.I. 19 x C.I.140) | 0.427 1 | 中耐 | 97 | Tammes Pale Blue | 0.317 7 | 中耐 | 147 | B-14 | 0.056 8 | 高敏 | ||||||||
48 | CIli 1519 | 0.422 5 | 中耐 | 98 | GRAND TURKISTAN 4 | 0.317 1 | 中耐 | 148 | Aleksim | 0.052 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
49 | CIli 1918 | 0.419 4 | 中耐 | 99 | L-93-2 | 0.316 7 | 中耐 | 149 | G-1781-4-18 | 0.034 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
50 | Viking | 0.412 3 | 中耐 | 100 | TARAGUI | 0.314 4 | 中耐 | 150 | Raisa | 0.022 1 | 高敏 |
Table 5 The salt tolerance level of 150 flax germplasm were analyzed based on D value
耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ALSEE | 0.956 7 | 高耐 | 51 | noname | 0.410 8 | 中耐 | 101 | Verchnevolzhkij | 0.313 4 | 中耐 | ||||||||
2 | OLEIFERA | 0.787 6 | 高耐 | 52 | Novelty | 0.410 3 | 中耐 | 102 | Line 657-01 | 0.307 3 | 中耐 | ||||||||
3 | CIli 2038 | 0.775 9 | 高耐 | 53 | L-60016-3-87 | 0.406 7 | 中耐 | 103 | VNIIL-742 | 0.302 3 | 中耐 | ||||||||
4 | VNIIL-180 | 0.668 1 | 耐盐 | 54 | ROYAL | 0.404 0 | 中耐 | 104 | Domtar Selection | 0.302 0 | 中耐 | ||||||||
5 | 谢列波 | 0.664 2 | 耐盐 | 55 | HINDI | 0.400 4 | 中耐 | 105 | VNIIL-1104 | 0.299 7 | 中耐 | ||||||||
6 | 1270 | 0.638 1 | 耐盐 | 56 | Argos | 0.399 8 | 中耐 | 106 | No. Dak. No. 40,013 | 0.297 9 | 中耐 | ||||||||
7 | CIli 2047 | 0.635 2 | 耐盐 | 57 | Mures | 0.396 7 | 中耐 | 107 | Marina | 0.290 0 | 敏感 | ||||||||
8 | MESSENIAS | 0.611 8 | 耐盐 | 58 | Linota | 0.395 8 | 中耐 | 108 | L-1120 | 0.282 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
9 | VNIIL-409 | 0.603 2 | 耐盐 | 59 | RIJKI | 0.394 6 | 中耐 | 109 | CIli 1617 | 0.279 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
10 | BELADI Y 6903 | 0.601 8 | 耐盐 | 60 | CIli 452 | 0.390 6 | 中耐 | 110 | Laura | 0.277 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
11 | CIli 642 | 0.598 7 | 耐盐 | 61 | Evelin | 0.389 0 | 中耐 | 111 | Hollandia | 0.273 8 | 敏感 | ||||||||
12 | Torzhokij 4 | 0.598 7 | 耐盐 | 62 | RABA 0189 | 0.387 5 | 中耐 | 112 | Z 11637 | 0.272 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
13 | CIli 1919 | 0.595 5 | 耐盐 | 63 | Q9903 | 0.387 3 | 中耐 | 113 | CDC Bethune-14 | 0.269 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
14 | 62/125-4 | 0.594 4 | 耐盐 | 64 | Tammes Type 12 | 0.386 2 | 中耐 | 114 | CYPRUS | 0.266 0 | 敏感 | ||||||||
15 | Crepitam Tabor | 0.593 5 | 耐盐 | 65 | Buda 80 | 0.385 5 | 中耐 | 115 | L-41 | 0.265 8 | 敏感 | ||||||||
16 | MINVANO | 0.590 1 | 耐盐 | 66 | CIli 897 | 0.379 9 | 中耐 | 116 | Tammes Type 5 | 0.260 9 | 敏感 | ||||||||
17 | VNIIL-918 | 0.577 2 | 耐盐 | 67 | CIli 1407 | 0.375 8 | 中耐 | 117 | Svetoch mutation | 0.255 9 | 敏感 | ||||||||
18 | BENVENUTO REAL | 0.573 1 | 耐盐 | 68 | Tajga | 0.375 1 | 中耐 | 118 | VNIIL-776 | 0.254 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
19 | VNIIL-725 | 0.541 1 | 耐盐 | 69 | 411704 Fiber | 0.373 4 | 中耐 | 119 | China 4 | 0.252 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
20 | Olayozon | 0.533 5 | 耐盐 | 70 | Q0415 | 0.371 2 | 中耐 | 120 | CIli 946 | 0.248 5 | 敏感 | ||||||||
21 | TIMBU | 0.527 8 | 耐盐 | 71 | VNIIL-6148 | 0.370 2 | 中耐 | 121 | Ariane | 0.242 6 | 敏感 | ||||||||
22 | VNIIL-3531 | 0.526 9 | 耐盐 | 72 | Sel. 176 x (19 x 112) | 0.369 0 | 中耐 | 122 | G 2063-5-10 | 0.242 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
23 | CIli 1490 | 0.525 5 | 耐盐 | 73 | ARANDAS | 0.368 7 | 中耐 | 123 | AR-2 | 0.239 3 | 敏感 | ||||||||
24 | Sel. C.I. 19-47 Pale Blue | 0.513 3 | 耐盐 | 74 | Tverta | 0.366 3 | 中耐 | 124 | VNIIL-5520 | 0.234 6 | 敏感 | ||||||||
25 | CIli 1525 | 0.510 2 | 耐盐 | 75 | L-140-16 | 0.364 2 | 中耐 | 125 | MARTIN | 0.225 9 | 敏感 | ||||||||
耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | 耐盐性排序 Order | 品种名称 Variety name | D值 D value | 等级 Level | ||||||||
26 | CIli 1749 | 0.497 0 | 耐盐 | 76 | L-8709-5-10 | 0.364 1 | 中耐 | 126 | China 2 | 0.213 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
27 | R-111 | 0.495 8 | 耐盐 | 77 | Common | 0.357 6 | 中耐 | 127 | Noralta | 0.208 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
28 | de metcha 1-3-6 Vilm | 0.488 5 | 耐盐 | 78 | CULBERT M3P3 | 0.355 7 | 中耐 | 128 | BETA 201 | 0.204 3 | 敏感 | ||||||||
29 | TR 35141 | 0.486 3 | 耐盐 | 79 | CIli 1679 | 0.347 9 | 中耐 | 129 | A-93 | 0.201 6 | 敏感 | ||||||||
30 | TOMAGAON | 0.484 9 | 耐盐 | 80 | Belinka | 0.346 1 | 中耐 | 130 | Sel. of Minn. 281 | 0.200 1 | 敏感 | ||||||||
31 | VNIIL-492 | 0.484 5 | 耐盐 | 81 | Natasja | 0.345 5 | 中耐 | 131 | China 1 | 0.197 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
32 | URUGUAY 36/48 | 0.483 4 | 耐盐 | 82 | Atlas (fiber) | 0.344 2 | 中耐 | 132 | Belochka | 0.197 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
33 | Atalante | 0.483 1 | 耐盐 | 83 | Macbeth | 0.344 1 | 中耐 | 133 | UNRYU | 0.197 4 | 敏感 | ||||||||
34 | LINAZA | 0.478 7 | 耐盐 | 84 | Mapun | 0.339 4 | 中耐 | 134 | VNIIL-519 | 0.189 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
35 | 41 | 0.477 5 | 耐盐 | 85 | MALABRIGO 1.7 | 0.339 2 | 中耐 | 135 | Artemida | 0.184 8 | 敏感 | ||||||||
36 | Pskovski 2976 | 0.473 4 | 耐盐 | 86 | CONCURRENT | 0.339 0 | 中耐 | 136 | Line 548-01 | 0.179 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
37 | REDSON | 0.470 8 | 耐盐 | 87 | Sel. of N.D.R. 114 | 0.338 7 | 中耐 | 137 | Escalina | 0.170 7 | 敏感 | ||||||||
38 | 38 | 0.458 9 | 耐盐 | 88 | CIli 908 | 0.336 7 | 中耐 | 138 | Line 629-01 | 0.164 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
39 | NOVA ROSSISK SELECTI | 0.457 1 | 耐盐 | 89 | Tammes Type 2 | 0.335 7 | 中耐 | 139 | DIADEM | 0.156 2 | 敏感 | ||||||||
40 | CIli 1464 | 0.438 9 | 中耐 | 90 | G-1847-4-1 | 0.333 2 | 中耐 | 140 | 阿卡塔 | 0.131 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
41 | K-y | 0.437 0 | 中耐 | 91 | CIli 1924 | 0.331 8 | 中耐 | 141 | K-1339 | 0.122 8 | 高敏 | ||||||||
42 | Novotorzhskij | 0.436 9 | 中耐 | 92 | QUERANDI | 0.328 3 | 中耐 | 142 | Diane | 0.122 2 | 高敏 | ||||||||
43 | Concurent | 0.434 5 | 中耐 | 93 | Peynau | 0.327 4 | 中耐 | 143 | Hermes | 0.108 2 | 高敏 | ||||||||
44 | Lusatia | 0.432 6 | 中耐 | 94 | Sagino | 0.325 5 | 中耐 | 144 | Korostenskij 3 | 0.103 6 | 高敏 | ||||||||
45 | Erythree | 0.428 1 | 中耐 | 95 | TAMMES TYPE 12 | 0.324 8 | 中耐 | 145 | L-500004-2-84 | 0.100 8 | 高敏 | ||||||||
46 | RECOLTE NO 0196 | 0.427 8 | 中耐 | 96 | China 6 | 0.322 4 | 中耐 | 146 | L. 270-68 | 0.073 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
47 | Res. x Hoshangabad (C.I. 19 x C.I.140) | 0.427 1 | 中耐 | 97 | Tammes Pale Blue | 0.317 7 | 中耐 | 147 | B-14 | 0.056 8 | 高敏 | ||||||||
48 | CIli 1519 | 0.422 5 | 中耐 | 98 | GRAND TURKISTAN 4 | 0.317 1 | 中耐 | 148 | Aleksim | 0.052 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
49 | CIli 1918 | 0.419 4 | 中耐 | 99 | L-93-2 | 0.316 7 | 中耐 | 149 | G-1781-4-18 | 0.034 4 | 高敏 | ||||||||
50 | Viking | 0.412 3 | 中耐 | 100 | TARAGUI | 0.314 4 | 中耐 | 150 | Raisa | 0.022 1 | 高敏 |
Fig.4 Differences of salt tolerance in flax different subgroupsduring germination Note:(A,C,E,G) Flax different subsets of the salt tolerance coefficient under salt stress distribution.(B,D,F,H) Flax between different subgroups of the boxplot of salt-tolerant coefficients.A and B: relative germination rate;C and D: relative shoot length; E and F: relative root length; G and H: D value
[1] | 廖岩, 彭友贵, 陈桂珠. 植物耐盐性机理研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2007,(5): 2077-2089. |
LIAO Yan, PENG Yougui, CHEN Guizhu. Research advances in plant salt-tolerance mechanism[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007,(5): 2077-2089. | |
[2] | 吴淑杭, 周德平, 姜震方. 盐碱地改良与利用研究进展[J]. 上海农业科技, 2007,(2): 23-25. |
WU Shuhang, ZHOU Deping, JIANG Zhenfang. Research progress on improvement and utilization of saline-alkali land[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2007,(2): 23-25. | |
[3] | 李彬, 王志春, 孙志高, 等. 中国盐碱地资源与可持续利用研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005,(2): 154-158. |
LI Bin, WANG Zhichun, SUN Zhigao, et al. Resources and sustainable resource exploitation of salinized land in China[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005,(2): 154-158. | |
[4] | 杨真, 王宝山. 中国盐渍土资源现状及改良利用对策[J]. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(4): 125-130. |
YANG Zhen, WANG Baoshan. Present Status of Saline Soil Resources andCountermeasures for Improvement and Utilization in China[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 47(4): 125-130. | |
[5] | 赵利, 赵玮, 李闻娟, 等. 不同环境下胡麻脂肪酸含量的遗传分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6): 48-55. |
ZHAO Li, ZHAO Wei, LI Wenjuan, et al. Genetic analysis of fatty acid contents in flax (Linum usitatissimun L.) grown under different environmental conditions[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6): 48-55. | |
[6] | 郭媛, 邱财生, 龙松华, 等. 盐碱胁迫对不同地区亚麻主栽品种种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2013, 32(12): 1-5. |
GUO Yuan, QIU Caisheng, LONG Songhua, et al. The Effect of Salinity-Alkalinity Stress on Seed Cermination of Main FlaxCultivars in Different Region ( Linum usitatissimum L.)[J]. Seed, 2013, 32(12): 1-5. | |
[7] | 于莹, 程莉莉, 赵东升, 等. 亚麻品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015,(1): 1-5. |
YU Ying, CHENG Lili, ZHAO Dongsheng, et al. Salt Tolerance Identification of FlaxVarieties at Germination Stage[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015,(1): 1-5. | |
[8] | Zaghdoudi M, Baatour O, Bensalem N, et al. Effect of saline conditions on germination and enzymatic activity in two varieties of Linum usitatissimum seeds[J]. Journal of New Sciences, 2015, 20(1):780-787. |
[9] | Datir S S. Salt-Induced Physiological and Biochemical Changes in two varieties of Linum usitatissimum L.[J]. International Journal of Current Microbiology & Applied Sciences, 2015, 4(9): 296-304. |
[10] | 赵玮, 齐燕妮, 张建平, 等. 胡麻资源萌发期耐盐综合性评价[J]. 植物研究, 2019, 39(6): 955-963. |
ZHAO Wei, QI Yanni, ZHANG Jianping, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation for Salinity Tolerance of Flax Resources During Germination[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019. 39(6): 955-963. | |
[11] |
Guo D, Jiang H, Yan W, et al. Resequencing 200 Flax Cultivated Accessions Identifies Candidate Genes Related to Seed Size and Weight and Reveals Signatures of Artificial Selection[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 10: 1682.
DOI URL |
[12] | 郭栋良, 江海霞, 钟俐, 等. 不同地区亚麻萌发期耐盐碱性遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 35(3): 360-365. |
GUO Dongliang, JIANG Haixia, ZHONG Li, et al. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Saline-alkali Tolerance of Flax(Linum Usitatissimum L.) from Different Regions during theGermination Period[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University(Natural Science Ed.), 2018, 35(3): 360-365. | |
[13] | 陈新, 张宗文, 吴斌. 裸燕麦萌发期耐盐性综合评价与耐盐种质筛选[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10): 2038-2046. |
CHEN Xin, ZHANG Zongwen, WU Bin. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Screening for Salt Tolerant Accessions of Naked Oat (Avena nuda L.)at Germination Stage[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(10): 2038-2046. | |
[14] | 马晓军, 金峰学, 杨姗, 等. 作物耐盐碱数量性状基因座(QTL)定位[J]. 分子植物育种, 2015, 13(1): 221-227. |
MA Xiaojun, JIN Fengxue, YANG Shan, et al. Mapping QTLs for Salt & Alkaline Tolerance in Crops[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2015, 13(1): 221-227. | |
[15] | 郭远, 王文成, 徐颖莹, 等. 植物耐盐评价方法综述[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(23): 18-23. |
GUO Yuan, WANG Wencheng, XU Yingying, et al. Plant salt tolerance evaluation methods were reviewed[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(23): 18-23. | |
[16] | 张笛, 苗兴芬, 王雨婷. 100份谷子品种资源萌发期耐盐性评价及耐盐品种筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(6): 43-49. |
ZHANG Di, MIAO Xingfen, WANG Yuting. Evaluation and Screening of Salt Tolerance in 100 Foxtail Millet at Germination Stage[J]. Crops, 2019,(6): 43-49. | |
[17] | 荆瑞勇, 王丽艳, 郑桂萍, 等. 水稻萌发期和幼苗期耐盐性鉴定指标筛选及综合评价[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2019, 31(6): 1-6,19. |
JING Ruiyong, WANG Liyan, ZHENG Guiping, et al. Comprehensive Assessment and Selection of Identification Index of Rice Salt Tolerance at Germination Stage and Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2019, 31(6): 1-6,19. | |
[18] | 陶金, 侯龙鱼, 杨杰, 等. 燕麦萌发耐盐性及指标筛选[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(10): 2414-2421. |
TAO Jin, HOU Longyu, YANG Jie, et al. Comparative studies on seed germination characteristics and indicators of oat varieties under salt stress[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(10): 2414-2421. | |
[19] | 张玉娟, 游均, 刘爱丽, 等. 芝麻发芽期耐盐性鉴定方法研究及耐盐候选基因的挖掘[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(12): 2235-2247. |
ZHANG Yujuan, YOU Jun, LIU Aili, et al. Screening Method for Salt Tolerance in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and Identification of Candidate Salt-Tolerant Genes[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(12): 2235-2247. | |
[20] | Qayyum M A, Akhtar J, Saqib Z A, et al. Phenotyping of linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) genotypes for potential against NaCl stress[J]. Soil Environ, 2015, 34(2):200-206. |
[21] |
Moghaddam M, Babaei K, Pooya E S. Germination and growth response of flax (Linum usitatissimum) to salinity stress by different salt types and concentrations[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2018, 41(5): 563-573.
DOI URL |
[22] | 张海艳. 不同品种玉米萌发期和苗期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(5): 61-67. |
ZHANG Haiyan. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance of Different Corn Varieties at the Germination and Seedling Stages[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016, 24(5): 61-67. | |
[23] | 慈敦伟, 杨吉顺, 丁红, 等. 盐胁迫对花生植株形态建成及物质积累的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2018, 47(1): 11-18. |
CI Dunwei, YANG Jishun, DING Hong, et al. Effects of Salt Stress on Plant Morphogenesis and Matter Accumulation of Peanut[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2018, 47(1): 11-18. | |
[24] | 胡涛, 张鸽香, 郑福超, 等. 植物盐胁迫响应的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(9): 3006-3015. |
HU Tao, ZHANG Gexiang, ZHEN Fuchao, et al. Research Progress in Plant Salt Stress Response[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(9): 3006-3015. | |
[25] | 徐恒恒, 黎妮, 刘树君, 等. 种子萌发及其调控的研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2014, 40(7): 1141-1156. |
XU Hengheng, LI Ni, LIU Shujun, et al. Research Progress in Seed Germination and Its Control[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(7): 1141-1156.
DOI URL |
|
[26] |
Demissew Sertse, Frank M.You, Sridhar Ravichandran, et al. The genetic structure of flax illustrates environmental and anthropogenic selections that gave rise to its eco-geographical adaptation[J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 2019, 137:22-32.
DOI PMID |
[27] |
Allaby R G, Peterson G W, Merriwether D A, et al. Evidence of the domestication history of flax ( Linum usitatissimum L.) from genetic diversity of the sad2 locus[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2005, 112(1):58-65.
DOI URL PMID |
[1] | SONG Bingmei, JIANG Yan, CHEN Xin, ZHANG Yu, CHENG Wannan, PAN Hongsheng. Evaluation of saline/alkali tolerance of new transgenic High-Yield cotton at germination and seedling stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
[2] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[3] | YAO Qing, Aribelegan Hazzetti, YANG Minghua, LI Qiang, MIAO Haocui, CUI Hongliang. Response of quinoa seeds to germination temperature and identification of germination ability under low temperature stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149. |
[4] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[5] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[6] | MA Hui, DAI Lu, LI Xingxing, Abuduaini Abuduweili, Aimaierjiang Abulitifu, TIAN Liwen, OU Huan. Analysis of the influence of different chemical treatments on the sealing effect of long staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608. |
[7] | SHAN Ying, LI Yue, XU Min, LIU Yanzhen, LI Ran, CHEN Jieyin, WANG Zisheng, ZHU He. Drought resistance evaluation of liaomian cotton varieties at germination stage under PEG simulated drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2653-2660. |
[8] | Buhaliqiemu Abulizi, ZHANG Yanhong, YUAN Jie, ZHAO Zhiqiang, WEN Xiaorong, DU Xiaojing, WANG Fengbin, LYU Yuping, Amanguli Aizizi. Screening and evaluation of aromatic rice varieties with high quality and high yield in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703. |
[9] | LIU Ping, ZHANG Kai, MA Chao, ZHANG Hui, YANG Chuan. Evaluation of the comprehensive efficiency of cotton field with different phosphate fertilizer dosage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2521-2531. |
[10] | DOU Ziwei, YANG Lu, CHENG Ping, ZHANG Zhigang, LI Hong. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Nutritional Quality of Different Mulberry Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 127-139. |
[11] | LI Jiangyan, ZHANG Xianhua, YUAN Xiaoqiang, YUAN Hui, LIU Wenxin. Study on the Growth Characteristics and Water Consumption Law of Dactylisglomerata Seedling under Drought Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1502-1512. |
[12] | MA YanMing, ZHAO LianJia, WANG Wei, AN Xuechun, XIANG Li, MIAO Yu. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Barley Germplasm Resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2628-2636. |
[13] | LIAO Niu, DIAO Ming, CUI Hongxin, NIU Ning, LIU Huiying. Effect of Drip Irrigation with Saltwater during Flowering on Main Characters of 10 Tomato Germplasm and Evaluation of Salt Tolerance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2486-2494. |
[14] | ZHAO Wei, MA Haixia, ZHANG Yanping. Threshold Analysis of Salt Stress in Flax at Germination and seedling Stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(1): 145-154. |
[15] | HAN Dengxu, YANG Jie, WANG Yejian, XI Haojiang, LIANG Xiaoling, LI Mingdong, Abulaiti Abula. Comprehensive Evaluation of Low Temperature Germination Resistance of Backbone Maize Inbred Lines at Home and Abroad [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(3): 401-411. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||