Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (5): 1084-1092.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.006
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Zhe1(), Rebiye Yusun2, Maimaiti Moming3, Wumaierjiang Kurban4, AI Xiantao3(), GAO Shan1()
Received:
2021-11-27
Online:
2022-05-20
Published:
2022-06-09
Correspondence author:
AI Xiantao, GAO Shan
Supported by:
张哲1(), 热比耶·玉荪2, 买买提·莫明3, 吾买尔江·库尔班4, 艾先涛3(), 高山1()
通讯作者:
艾先涛,高山
作者简介:
张哲( 1998- ),男,山西临汾人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物高产生理生态与节水,(E-mail) 2694043151@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Zhe, Rebiye Yusun, Maimaiti Moming, Wumaierjiang Kurban, AI Xiantao, GAO Shan. Analysis of Agronomic Characters of Cotton Varieties in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1084-1092.
张哲, 热比耶·玉荪, 买买提·莫明, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 艾先涛, 高山. 新疆棉花生产品种机采农艺性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1084-1092.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.05.006
序号 | 品种名 | 序号 | 品种名 | 序号 | 品种名 | 序号 | 品种名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 新陆中87(JM47) | 26 | 新陆早55号 | 51 | 金垦1442 | 76 | WY26 |
2 | 新陆中85号 | 27 | 新陆早52号 | 52 | X1P075 | 77 | WY25 |
3 | 新陆中84号 | 28 | 新陆早46号(JM18) | 53 | NH12026 | 78 | WY24 |
4 | 新陆中82号 | 29 | 新陆早37号 | 54 | H33-1-4 | 79 | WY23 |
5 | 新陆中79号 | 30 | 新陆早26号 | 55 | 耕野2186 | 80 | WY16 |
6 | 新陆中74号(JM52) | 31 | 早84(JM06) | 56 | 天云0769 | 81 | WY15 |
7 | 新陆中70号(塔河) | 32 | 早45-2(JM05) | 57 | 禾棉A9-9 | 82 | WY14 |
8 | 新陆中68号 | 33 | 中113 | 58 | 新垦棉1号 | 83 | WY12 |
9 | 新陆中67号 | 34 | 中99 | 59 | 锦科棉9号 | 84 | WY8 |
10 | 新陆中63号(杂) | 35 | 中88 | 60 | 塔河2号 | 85 | WY6 |
11 | 新陆中59号 | 36 | 中63 | 61 | 瑞丰818 | 86 | WY4 |
12 | 新陆中55号 | 37 | 中49 | 62 | 瑞丰66 | 87 | WY3 |
13 | 新陆中52号 | 38 | 中棉所96A | 63 | 冀杂708 | 88 | 13号 |
14 | 新陆中42号(塔河) | 39 | 中棉所88 | 64 | 国欣71 | 89 | 12号 |
15 | 新陆中38号 | 40 | 中棉所79 | 65 | 合信2012 | 90 | 11号 |
16 | 新陆中37号(塔河) | 41 | 中棉所66 | 66 | 棉博士78 | 91 | 10号 |
17 | 新陆中36号 | 42 | 源棉11 | 67 | 创棉508 | 92 | 9号 |
18 | 新陆早84号 | 43 | 源棉7 | 68 | 惠远720 | 93 | 8号 |
19 | 新陆早77号 | 44 | 源棉6 | 69 | WY71 | 94 | 7号 |
20 | 新陆早76号 | 45 | 巴棉66-2 | 70 | WY62 | 95 | 6号 |
21 | 新陆早66号(JM16) | 46 | 巴棉31 | 71 | WY52 | 96 | 5号 |
22 | 新陆早65号 | 47 | 友质71 | 72 | WY32 | 97 | 4号 |
23 | 新陆早64号 | 48 | 友质54 | 73 | WY31 | 98 | 3号 |
24 | 新陆早63号 | 49 | J206-5 | 74 | WY30 | 99 | 2号 |
25 | 新陆早57号 | 50 | J8031 | 75 | WY29 | 100 | 1号 |
Table 1 Names of 100 cotton varieties
序号 | 品种名 | 序号 | 品种名 | 序号 | 品种名 | 序号 | 品种名 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 新陆中87(JM47) | 26 | 新陆早55号 | 51 | 金垦1442 | 76 | WY26 |
2 | 新陆中85号 | 27 | 新陆早52号 | 52 | X1P075 | 77 | WY25 |
3 | 新陆中84号 | 28 | 新陆早46号(JM18) | 53 | NH12026 | 78 | WY24 |
4 | 新陆中82号 | 29 | 新陆早37号 | 54 | H33-1-4 | 79 | WY23 |
5 | 新陆中79号 | 30 | 新陆早26号 | 55 | 耕野2186 | 80 | WY16 |
6 | 新陆中74号(JM52) | 31 | 早84(JM06) | 56 | 天云0769 | 81 | WY15 |
7 | 新陆中70号(塔河) | 32 | 早45-2(JM05) | 57 | 禾棉A9-9 | 82 | WY14 |
8 | 新陆中68号 | 33 | 中113 | 58 | 新垦棉1号 | 83 | WY12 |
9 | 新陆中67号 | 34 | 中99 | 59 | 锦科棉9号 | 84 | WY8 |
10 | 新陆中63号(杂) | 35 | 中88 | 60 | 塔河2号 | 85 | WY6 |
11 | 新陆中59号 | 36 | 中63 | 61 | 瑞丰818 | 86 | WY4 |
12 | 新陆中55号 | 37 | 中49 | 62 | 瑞丰66 | 87 | WY3 |
13 | 新陆中52号 | 38 | 中棉所96A | 63 | 冀杂708 | 88 | 13号 |
14 | 新陆中42号(塔河) | 39 | 中棉所88 | 64 | 国欣71 | 89 | 12号 |
15 | 新陆中38号 | 40 | 中棉所79 | 65 | 合信2012 | 90 | 11号 |
16 | 新陆中37号(塔河) | 41 | 中棉所66 | 66 | 棉博士78 | 91 | 10号 |
17 | 新陆中36号 | 42 | 源棉11 | 67 | 创棉508 | 92 | 9号 |
18 | 新陆早84号 | 43 | 源棉7 | 68 | 惠远720 | 93 | 8号 |
19 | 新陆早77号 | 44 | 源棉6 | 69 | WY71 | 94 | 7号 |
20 | 新陆早76号 | 45 | 巴棉66-2 | 70 | WY62 | 95 | 6号 |
21 | 新陆早66号(JM16) | 46 | 巴棉31 | 71 | WY52 | 96 | 5号 |
22 | 新陆早65号 | 47 | 友质71 | 72 | WY32 | 97 | 4号 |
23 | 新陆早64号 | 48 | 友质54 | 73 | WY31 | 98 | 3号 |
24 | 新陆早63号 | 49 | J206-5 | 74 | WY30 | 99 | 2号 |
25 | 新陆早57号 | 50 | J8031 | 75 | WY29 | 100 | 1号 |
性状 Trait | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 极差 Range | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异 系数 CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 123.0 | 158.0 | 35.0 | 141.1 | 6.9 | 4.9 |
X2 | 62.9 | 112.1 | 49.3 | 94.3 | 8.0 | 8.5 |
X3 | 9.0 | 14.7 | 5.7 | 11.5 | 0.9 | 8.2 |
X4 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 7.9 |
X5 | 21.0 | 38.1 | 17.1 | 26.9 | 3.1 | 11.5 |
X6 | 45.5 | 65.2 | 19.7 | 57.8 | 3.9 | 6.8 |
X7 | 3.9 | 9.8 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 16.0 |
X8 | 0.9 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 25.8 |
X9 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 64.0 |
X10 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 17.1 |
X11 | 4.2 | 14.2 | 10.0 | 9.9 | 2.0 | 20.2 |
X12 | 4.8 | 17.5 | 12.7 | 12.5 | 2.1 | 16.8 |
Table 2 Variation Analysis of agronomic characters of 100 cotton varieties
性状 Trait | 最小值 Min | 最大值 Max | 极差 Range | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD | 变异 系数 CV (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 123.0 | 158.0 | 35.0 | 141.1 | 6.9 | 4.9 |
X2 | 62.9 | 112.1 | 49.3 | 94.3 | 8.0 | 8.5 |
X3 | 9.0 | 14.7 | 5.7 | 11.5 | 0.9 | 8.2 |
X4 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 2.5 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 7.9 |
X5 | 21.0 | 38.1 | 17.1 | 26.9 | 3.1 | 11.5 |
X6 | 45.5 | 65.2 | 19.7 | 57.8 | 3.9 | 6.8 |
X7 | 3.9 | 9.8 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 1.1 | 16.0 |
X8 | 0.9 | 6.7 | 5.8 | 4.3 | 1.1 | 25.8 |
X9 | 0.0 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 64.0 |
X10 | 0.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 17.1 |
X11 | 4.2 | 14.2 | 10.0 | 9.9 | 2.0 | 20.2 |
X12 | 4.8 | 17.5 | 12.7 | 12.5 | 2.1 | 16.8 |
性状 Trait | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | |||||||||||
X2 | 0.20* | 1 | ||||||||||
X3 | -0.11 | 0.4 | 1 | |||||||||
X4 | 0.4 | 0.23* | -0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
X5 | 0.19 | 0.5 | -0.07 | 0.4 | 1 | |||||||
X6 | 0.16 | -0.12 | 0.01 | 0.20* | -0.3 | 1 | ||||||
X7 | -0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.19 | -0.19 | 1 | |||||
X8 | -0.5 | 0.09 | 0.17 | -0.16 | 0.03 | -0.23* | 0.8 | 1 | ||||
X9 | -0.15 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.13 | -0.07 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1 | |||
X10 | -0.6 | -0.12 | -0.02 | -0.3 | -0.13 | -0.18 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.15 | 1 | ||
X11 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.21* | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.16 | 0.15 | -0.07 | 0.3 | -0.2 | 1 | |
X12 | 0.3 | 0.08 | -0.01 | 0.3 | -0.03 | 0.4 | -0.11 | -0.17 | 0.1 | -0.16 | 0.7 | 1 |
Table 3 Correlation analysis of agronomic characters of 100 cotton varieties
性状 Trait | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1 | |||||||||||
X2 | 0.20* | 1 | ||||||||||
X3 | -0.11 | 0.4 | 1 | |||||||||
X4 | 0.4 | 0.23* | -0.01 | 1 | ||||||||
X5 | 0.19 | 0.5 | -0.07 | 0.4 | 1 | |||||||
X6 | 0.16 | -0.12 | 0.01 | 0.20* | -0.3 | 1 | ||||||
X7 | -0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.04 | 0.19 | -0.19 | 1 | |||||
X8 | -0.5 | 0.09 | 0.17 | -0.16 | 0.03 | -0.23* | 0.8 | 1 | ||||
X9 | -0.15 | 0 | 0.12 | 0 | 0.13 | -0.07 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 1 | |||
X10 | -0.6 | -0.12 | -0.02 | -0.3 | -0.13 | -0.18 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.15 | 1 | ||
X11 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.21* | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.16 | 0.15 | -0.07 | 0.3 | -0.2 | 1 | |
X12 | 0.3 | 0.08 | -0.01 | 0.3 | -0.03 | 0.4 | -0.11 | -0.17 | 0.1 | -0.16 | 0.7 | 1 |
性状 Trait | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 因子5 Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.45 | 0.03 | -0.13 | 0.04 | -0.03 |
X2 | 0.11 | 0.43 | -0.26 | -0.36 | 0.13 |
X3 | -0.04 | 0.29 | 0.04 | -0.73 | -0.12 |
X4 | 0.29 | 0.23 | -0.05 | 0.26 | 0.45 |
X5 | 0.11 | 0.36 | -0.43 | 0.35 | 0.08 |
X6 | 0.21 | -0.09 | 0.54 | -0.14 | 0.33 |
X7 | -0.27 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
X8 | -0.43 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.23 |
X9 | -0.09 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.28 | -0.70 |
X10 | -0.44 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.22 |
X11 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.07 | -0.21 |
X12 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.06 |
特征值 Characteri stic value | 3.39 | 2.62 | 1.62 | 1.20 | 0.91 |
贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 28.28 | 21.81 | 13.49 | 9.97 | 7.59 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate(%) | 28.28 | 50.10 | 63.58 | 73.56 | 81.15 |
Table 4 Principal component analysis of agronomic characters of 100 cotton varieties
性状 Trait | 因子1 Factor 1 | 因子2 Factor 2 | 因子3 Factor 3 | 因子4 Factor 4 | 因子5 Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.45 | 0.03 | -0.13 | 0.04 | -0.03 |
X2 | 0.11 | 0.43 | -0.26 | -0.36 | 0.13 |
X3 | -0.04 | 0.29 | 0.04 | -0.73 | -0.12 |
X4 | 0.29 | 0.23 | -0.05 | 0.26 | 0.45 |
X5 | 0.11 | 0.36 | -0.43 | 0.35 | 0.08 |
X6 | 0.21 | -0.09 | 0.54 | -0.14 | 0.33 |
X7 | -0.27 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
X8 | -0.43 | 0.30 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.23 |
X9 | -0.09 | 0.28 | 0.22 | 0.28 | -0.70 |
X10 | -0.44 | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.16 | 0.22 |
X11 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.07 | -0.21 |
X12 | 0.30 | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.10 | 0.06 |
特征值 Characteri stic value | 3.39 | 2.62 | 1.62 | 1.20 | 0.91 |
贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 28.28 | 21.81 | 13.49 | 9.97 | 7.59 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate(%) | 28.28 | 50.10 | 63.58 | 73.56 | 81.15 |
类群 Group | 生育期 X1 | 株高 X2 | 果枝数 X3 | 果枝 始节 X4 | 果枝 始节 高度 X5 | 果枝 夹角 X6 | 单株 结铃 X7 | 吐絮 铃数 X8 | 叶枝 X9 | 吐絮率 X10 | 上部果 枝第1 果节 长度 X11 | 中部果 枝第1 果节 长度 X12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 143.8 | 85.2 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 24.7 | 55.0 | 6.4 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 11.9 |
Ⅱ | 132.5 | 81.3 | 11.0 | 6.2 | 24.4 | 58.4 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 8.1 | 11.7 |
Ⅲ | 147.0 | 102.0 | 11.8 | 6.7 | 29.2 | 56.3 | 7.3 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 11.0 | 11.9 |
Ⅳ | 151.9 | 95.9 | 11.1 | 6.7 | 27.3 | 58.7 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 11.8 | 14.3 |
Ⅴ | 131.0 | 96.4 | 11.9 | 6.1 | 26.8 | 54.8 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 9.4 | 11.8 |
Ⅵ | 137.9 | 104.1 | 12.1 | 6.5 | 29.5 | 55.8 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 10.8 | 12.6 |
Ⅶ | 141.0 | 93.7 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 26.4 | 60.2 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 9.6 | 12.6 |
Table 5 Average number of agronomic characters of different groups
类群 Group | 生育期 X1 | 株高 X2 | 果枝数 X3 | 果枝 始节 X4 | 果枝 始节 高度 X5 | 果枝 夹角 X6 | 单株 结铃 X7 | 吐絮 铃数 X8 | 叶枝 X9 | 吐絮率 X10 | 上部果 枝第1 果节 长度 X11 | 中部果 枝第1 果节 长度 X12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | 143.8 | 85.2 | 10.7 | 6.1 | 24.7 | 55.0 | 6.4 | 3.7 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 9.0 | 11.9 |
Ⅱ | 132.5 | 81.3 | 11.0 | 6.2 | 24.4 | 58.4 | 7.0 | 5.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 8.1 | 11.7 |
Ⅲ | 147.0 | 102.0 | 11.8 | 6.7 | 29.2 | 56.3 | 7.3 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 11.0 | 11.9 |
Ⅳ | 151.9 | 95.9 | 11.1 | 6.7 | 27.3 | 58.7 | 6.2 | 3.1 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 11.8 | 14.3 |
Ⅴ | 131.0 | 96.4 | 11.9 | 6.1 | 26.8 | 54.8 | 7.3 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 9.4 | 11.8 |
Ⅵ | 137.9 | 104.1 | 12.1 | 6.5 | 29.5 | 55.8 | 7.7 | 5.0 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 10.8 | 12.6 |
Ⅶ | 141.0 | 93.7 | 11.5 | 6.5 | 26.4 | 60.2 | 6.7 | 4.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 9.6 | 12.6 |
[1] |
陈秀玲, 张巨松, 陈振, 等. 不同机采棉花品种生长发育及光合物质生产的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(3): 408-417.
DOI |
CHEN Xiuling, ZHANG Jusong, CHEN Zhen, et al. Comparison of growth, development and photosynthetic matter production of different mechanically harvested cotton varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(3): 408-417.
DOI |
|
[2] | 王彦. 哈密垦区机采棉品种筛选及种植模式研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2016. |
WANG Yan. Selection of machine picked cotton varieties and Study on planting mode in Hami reclamation area[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016. | |
[3] | 李武, 谢德意, 赵付安, 等. 黄河流域棉花品种农艺性状的主成分及聚类分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(8): 82-85. |
LI Wu, XIE Deyi, ZHAO Fu'an, et al. Principal component and cluster analysis of agronomic characters of cotton varieties in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(8): 82-85. | |
[4] | 艾尼江, 朱新霞, 吕军, 等. 我国早熟陆地棉品种遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(3): 402-410. |
AI Nijiang, ZHU Xinxia, LÜ Jun, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of early maturing Upland Cotton Varieties in China[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(3): 402-410. | |
[5] | 艾先涛, 李雪源, 王俊铎, 等. 北疆陆地棉育成品种表型性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2011, 9(1): 113-122. |
AI Xiantao, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of Upland Cotton Varieties in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2011, 9(1): 113-122. | |
[6] | 袁加红, 刘正杰, 吴慧琳, 等. 111份藜麦种质资源农艺性状分析[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 35(4): 572-580, 650. |
YUAN Jiahong, LIU Zhengjie, WU Huilin, et al. Analysis of agronomic characters of 111 quinoa germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2020, 35(4): 572-580, 650. | |
[7] | 薛云云, 田跃霞, 张鑫, 等. 72份山西花生资源主要农艺和品质性状分析[J]. 花生学报, 2020, 49(4): 31-37. |
XUE Yunyun, TIAN Yuexia, ZHANG Xin, et al. Analysis of Main Agronomic and quality characters of 72 peanut resources in Shanxi[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2020, 49(4): 31-37. | |
[8] | 陈朝阳, 易晓余, 熊君, 等. 118个小麦新品系的农艺性状和分子标记评价[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2018, 36(6): 722-728. |
CHEN Chaoyang, YI Xiaoyu, XIONG Jun, et al. Evaluation of agronomic characters and molecular markers of 118 new wheat lines[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2018, 36(6): 722-728. | |
[9] | 王光禄, 刘志宏, 程倩倩, 等. 94份国外小麦种质材料的主要农艺性状分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(5): 577-582. |
WANG Guanglu, LIU Zhihong, CHENG Qianqian, et al. Analysis of main agronomic characters of 94 foreign wheat germplasm materials[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(5): 577-582. | |
[10] | 孙振纲, 姜艳丽, 陈耕, 等. 27个陆地棉新种质材料主要性状研究及聚类分析[J]. 山西农业科学, 2015, 43(7): 773-776. |
SUN Zhengang, JIANG Yanli, CHEN Geng, et al. Study on main characters and cluster analysis of 27 new upland cotton germplasm materials[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(7): 773-776. | |
[11] | 曲志华, 白苇, 张丽丽, 等. 170份亚麻种质资源主要农艺性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(4): 77-83. |
QU Zhihua, BAI Wei, ZHANG Lili, et al. Analysis of main agronomic characters of 170 flax germplasm resources[J]. Crops, 2019,(4): 77-83. | |
[12] | 步洪凤, 张忠武, 邓正春, 等. 26个辣椒品种主要农艺性状分析与测评[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(7): 1290-1296. |
BU Hongfeng, ZHANG Zhongwu, DENG Zhengchun, et al. Analysis and evaluation of main agronomic characters of 26 pepper varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(7): 1290-1296. | |
[13] | 邓艳凤, 肖水平, 柯兴盛, 等. 长江流域早熟棉新品系主要产量、品质及农艺性状的分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2019, 41(5): 861-872. |
DENG Yanfeng, XIAO Shuiping, KE Xingsheng, et al. Analysis of main yield, quality and agronomic characters of New Early Maturing Cotton Lines in the Yangtze River Basin[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2019, 41(5): 861-872. | |
[14] |
王俊铎, 龚照龙, 梁亚军, 等. 200份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9): 1623-1629.
DOI |
WANG Junduo, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic characters of 200 Upland Cotton Germplasm Resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9): 1623-1629. | |
[15] | 齐海坤, 左彦利, 张伯谦, 等. 黄河流域黑龙港植棉区棉花主要产量决策性状分析[J]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(6):483-490. |
QI Haikun, ZUO Yanli, ZHANG Boqian, et al. Analysis of main yield decision-making characters of cotton in Heilonggang cotton planting area of the Yellow River Basin[J]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(6): 483-490. | |
[16] | 楚宗艳, 赵鹏飞, 杜玉倍, 等. 一批棉花品系农艺性状与产量的相关和通径分析[J]. 棉花科学, 2016, 38(4):22-28. |
CHU Zongyan, ZHAO Pengfei, DU Yubei, et al. Correlation and path analysis between Agronomic Characters and yield of a batch of cotton lines[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 38(4): 22-28. | |
[17] | 何忠盛, 孙绘健, 陈玉娜, 等. 巴州棉花品种比较试验参试品种丰产稳定性分析[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2021,(4): 4-6. |
HE Zhongsheng, SUN Huijian, CHEN Yuna, et al. Analysis of high yield stability of cotton varieties in Bazhou comparative experiment[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021,(4): 4-6. | |
[18] | 孔清泉, 杨兆光, 吴振江, 等. 陆地棉92份种质资源主要性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 棉花科学, 2020, 42(3): 33-40. |
KONG Qingquan, YANG Zhaoguang, WU Zhenjiang, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of main characters of 92 Upland Cotton Germplasm Resources[J]. Cotton Science, 2020, 42(3): 33-40. | |
[19] | 吉光鹏. 早中熟陆地棉种质资源主要农艺性状的综合评价及聚类分析[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2015, 38(5): 3-5. |
JI Guangpeng. Comprehensive evaluation and cluster analysis of main agronomic characters of early and medium maturity upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2015, 38(5): 3-5. | |
[20] | 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 张泽坤, 等. 新疆南疆机采棉品种株型结构与产量性状的相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):722-728. |
ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, ZHANG Zekun, et al. Correlation between plant type structure and yield characters of machine picked cotton varieties in southern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4): 722-728. | |
[21] | 邢晋, 张思平, 赵新华, 等. 种植密度和缩节胺互作对棉花株型及产量的调控效应[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(1):53-61. |
XING Jin, ZHANG Siping, ZHAO Xinhua, et al. Regulatory effects of plant density and ketamine interaction on cotton plant type and yield[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(1): 53-61. | |
[22] | 王燕, 王树林, 张谦, 等. 机采棉主要农艺性状与密度相关性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(6): 66-70. |
WANG Yan, WANG Shulin, ZHANG Qian, et al. Correlation analysis between main agronomic characters and density of mechanically harvested cotton[J]. Crops, 2019,(6): 66-70. | |
[23] | 尹会会, 李秋芝, 李海涛, 等. 134份国外陆地棉种质主要农艺性状与纤维品质性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6): 1105-1115. |
YIN Huihui, LI Qiuzhi, LI Haitao, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Main Agronomic and fiber quality traits of 134 foreign Upland Cotton Germplasm[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(6): 1105-1115. | |
[24] | 王宗文, 高明伟, 李洪田, 等. 不同棉花品种适宜机采性状比较研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(11): 24-28. |
WANG Zongwen, GAO Mingwei, LI Hongtian, et al. Comparative study on suitable mechanical mining characters of different cotton varieties[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 49(11): 24-28 | |
[25] | 徐安阳, 李琴, 李代阔, 等. 南疆不同类型棉花品种机采适宜性分析[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(11): 22-24, 33. |
XU Anyang, LI Qin, LI Daikuo, et al. Analysis of machine picking suitability of different types of cotton varieties in southern Xinjiang_[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(11): 22-24, 33. |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[3] | WANG Hui, GUO Jincheng, SONG Jia, ZHANG Tingjun, He Liangrong. Physiological and biochemical analysis of transgenic offspring of upland cotton GhCIPK6 under high temperature Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119. |
[4] | YANG Chuan, ZHANG Kai, CHEN Bing, ZHANG Hui, LIU Ping, CHANG Song, SHENG Jiandong. Responses of morphological characteristics of cotton to different water conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2120-2127. |
[5] | ZHU Yujie, LIN Ling, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Effect of modified cotton straw charcoal on ammonia volatilization characteristics of nitrogen fertilizer in grey desert soils of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2128-2137. |
[6] | YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[7] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[8] | LI Xueling, GUO Junxian, CHEN Li, SONG Heling, ZHANG Zhong. Effects of Different Film Mulching Width on Cotton Farmland Environment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1840-1847. |
[9] | YANG Ni, Mayila Yusuyin, YANG Yanlong, LI Chunping, ZHANG Dawei, XU Haijiang, LAI Chengxia. Comparative analysis of plant volatiles from the Verticillium-Infected withered spot and etiolated leaves in cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1975-1986. |
[10] | Mierzhati Mutalifu, SHI Xiunan, BO Junbing, Zubaidai Abudukerimu, Wulejialehasi Azhati, SHI Shubing. Effects of different delinting modes on seed vigor and seedling characteristics of cotton under PEG stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568. |
[11] | DUAN Songjiang, PENG Zengying, SHEN Yingying, Mulidier Baibolati, WU Yifan, CUI jianping, ZHANG Jusong. Responses of seed cotton yield and fiber quality of different sea island cotton varieties to nitrogen fertilizer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579. |
[12] | LIN Ling, ZHU Yujie, FENG Lei, TANG Guangmu, ZHANG Yunshu, XU Wanli. Features of aged cotton stalk charcoal and its effect on ammonia volatilization from sand soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1580-1588. |
[13] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[14] | XUE Zhengxuan, CAI Zhiping, ZHANG Zhijian, PENG Tianxiang, HUANG Zhiwei, HUANG Enze, WANG Peiling, LU Yanhui. Transfer of Hippodamia variegate between licorice and cotton fields based on rubidium marker technology [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1741-1747. |
[15] | LU Yantian, SANG Zhiqin, XU Can, ZHANG Li, XIA Chunlan, WANG Youde, LI Wei, CHEN Shubin. Evolution of main characters of maize varieties approved in Xinjiang and Ningxia over the years and analysis of the current situation of variety approval [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||