新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 2013-2021.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.023
收稿日期:
2022-11-29
出版日期:
2023-08-20
发布日期:
2023-08-14
通信作者:
王俊刚(1970-),男,甘肃秦安人,教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为杂草学,(E-mail)wangjungang98@163.com作者简介:
魏迎凤(1995-),女,新疆库尔勒人,硕士研究生,研究方向为杂草学,(E-mail)465694392@qq.com
基金资助:
WEI Yingfeng(), ZHANG Quancheng, ZHA Hui, WANG Xiaoli, WANG Jungang()
Received:
2022-11-29
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-08-14
Correspondence author:
WANG Jungang (1970-), male, native place:Qinan Gansu, Professor and master tutor of Shihezi University, research field: Cotton plant shape regulation, (E-mail)wangjungang98@163.comSupported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究喷施二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育及其生理指标的影响。【方法】采用温室盆栽法,喷施不同浓度(0、300、600、900、1 200、1 500 g.a.i/hm2)二甲戊灵,于施药后不同时间内(5、10、15、20、25、30 d)测定龙葵的株高、茎粗、叶面积、地上部分鲜重及叶绿素含量、可溶性糖含量、可溶性蛋白含量。【结果】龙葵的生长指标和生理指标随二甲戊灵剂量升高整体呈下降趋势,当浓度为1 500 g.a.i/hm2时对其影响最为严重。其中在处理第30 d时龙葵株高、叶面积、地上部分鲜重最小,相比对照存在显著差异,分别为2.02 cm、0.32 cm2、0.47 g。在处理前15 d时茎粗相比对照明显增粗,随着龙葵后期的生长对照茎粗明显高于各处理。与对照相比,可溶性糖、可溶性蛋白、叶绿素含量在第30 d时达到最小值3.12、0.06、0.62 mg/g,且分别减少了7.82、0.05、1.05 mg/g。【结论】二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期生长发育指标及生理指标具有显著影响,随药剂剂量浓度升高其各项指标整体呈现出下降趋势,且高浓度对其影响最为严重。
中图分类号:
魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021.
WEI Yingfeng, ZHANG Quancheng, ZHA Hui, WANG Xiaoli, WANG Jungang. Effect of pendimethalin on the main growth and development and physiological indicators of Solanum nigrum L.[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021.
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间 Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 4.67±1.00a | 6.15±0.84a | 8.43±0.91a | 11.09±1.17a | 14.52±1.65a | 20.13±2.48a |
300 | 1.98±0.31b | 2.44±0.52b | 2.93±0.88b | 4.13±1.26b | 4.22±1.53b | 5.54±2.13b |
600 | 1.56±0.34c | 1.89±0.31c | 1.96±0.26c | 2.31±0.24c | 2.39±0.56c | 2.30±0.36c |
900 | 1.31±0.27cd | 1.96±0.38c | 1.89±0.23c | 2.13±0.18cd | 2.18±0.27c | 2.15±0.16c |
1 200 | 1.18±0.21d | 1.90±0.21c | 1.81±0.22c | 1.93±0.14cd | 1.96±0.32c | 2.06±0.17c |
1 500 | 0.97±0.20d | 1.46±0.16d | 1.67±0.13c | 1.77±0.11d | 1.90±0.10c | 2.02±0.09c |
表1 不同浓度二甲戊灵下龙葵株高变化
Tab.1 The effect of pendimethalin on the plant height of Solanum nigrum L.(cm)
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间 Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 4.67±1.00a | 6.15±0.84a | 8.43±0.91a | 11.09±1.17a | 14.52±1.65a | 20.13±2.48a |
300 | 1.98±0.31b | 2.44±0.52b | 2.93±0.88b | 4.13±1.26b | 4.22±1.53b | 5.54±2.13b |
600 | 1.56±0.34c | 1.89±0.31c | 1.96±0.26c | 2.31±0.24c | 2.39±0.56c | 2.30±0.36c |
900 | 1.31±0.27cd | 1.96±0.38c | 1.89±0.23c | 2.13±0.18cd | 2.18±0.27c | 2.15±0.16c |
1 200 | 1.18±0.21d | 1.90±0.21c | 1.81±0.22c | 1.93±0.14cd | 1.96±0.32c | 2.06±0.17c |
1 500 | 0.97±0.20d | 1.46±0.16d | 1.67±0.13c | 1.77±0.11d | 1.90±0.10c | 2.02±0.09c |
图1 不同浓度二甲戊灵下不同时期龙葵的长势变化 注:A为施药后5 d龙葵的长势情况;B为施药后10 d龙葵的长势情况;C为施药后15 d龙葵的长势情况;D为施药后20 d龙葵的长势情况;E为施药后25 d龙葵的长势情况;F为施药后30 d龙葵的长势情况
Fig.1 Effect of pendimethalin of different concentrations on the growth of Solanum nigrum L.in different periods Note: A is the growth condition of the Solanum nigrum L.5 d after herbicides ; B is the growth condition of the Solanum nigrum L.10 d after herbicides ; C is the growth condition of the Solanum nigrum L.15 d after herbicides ; D is the growth condition of the Solanum nigrum L.20 d after herbicides ; E is the growth condition of the Solanum nigrum L.25 d after herbicides ; F is the growth condition of the Solanum nigrum L.30 d after herbicides.
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间 Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 0.05±0.01c | 0.06±0.01b | 0.10±0.01c | 0.16±0.03a | 0.21±0.03a | 0.25±0.03a |
300 | 0.08±0.02b | 0.12±0.02a | 0.13±0.02ab | 0.12±0.02bc | 0.13±0.01b | 0.13±0.02b |
600 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.12±0.02b | 0.12±0.02bcd | 0.12±0.01c | 0.14±0.01b |
900 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.12±0.02b | 0.11±0.01cd | 0.13±0.01bc | 0.13±0.01b |
1 200 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.12±0.02ab | 0.11±0.01d | 0.12±0.01c | 0.14±0.02b |
1 500 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.13±0.01a | 0.13±0.01a | 0.13±0.01b | 0.13±0.01bc | 0.14±0.02b |
表2 不同浓度二甲戊灵下龙葵茎粗变化
Tab.2 The effect of pendimethalin on the stem thickness of Solanum nigrum L.(cm)
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间 Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 0.05±0.01c | 0.06±0.01b | 0.10±0.01c | 0.16±0.03a | 0.21±0.03a | 0.25±0.03a |
300 | 0.08±0.02b | 0.12±0.02a | 0.13±0.02ab | 0.12±0.02bc | 0.13±0.01b | 0.13±0.02b |
600 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.12±0.02b | 0.12±0.02bcd | 0.12±0.01c | 0.14±0.01b |
900 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.12±0.02b | 0.11±0.01cd | 0.13±0.01bc | 0.13±0.01b |
1 200 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.12±0.02a | 0.12±0.02ab | 0.11±0.01d | 0.12±0.01c | 0.14±0.02b |
1 500 | 0.11±0.02a | 0.13±0.01a | 0.13±0.01a | 0.13±0.01b | 0.13±0.01bc | 0.14±0.02b |
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间 Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 0.26±0.05a | 0.41±0.07a | 0.77±0.13a | 1.50±0.46a | 3.92±1.39a | 10.06±1.75a |
300 | 0.21±0.04b | 0.32±0.06b | 0.48±0.22b | 0.72±0.11b | 2.02±0.28b | 4.10±0.65b |
600 | 0.20±0.04b | 0.33±0.10b | 0.47±0.13b | 0.47±0.11c | 1.09±0.29c | 2.03±0.36c |
900 | 0.22±0.05b | 0.31±0.05bc | 0.38±0.10c | 0.33±0.08cd | 0.57±0.14d | 0.98±0.12d |
1 200 | 0.21±0.04b | 0.32±0.06bc | 0.31±0.09c | 0.32±0.08d | 0.37±0.09d | 0.64±0.13d |
1 500 | 0.13±0.03c | 0.27±0.06c | 0.33±0.08c | 0.33±0.09cd | 0.36±0.03d | 0.47±0.10d |
表3 不同浓度二甲戊灵下龙葵地上部分鲜重变化
Tab.3 The effect of pendimethalin on the fresh weight of the ground part of Solanum nigrum L.(g)
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间 Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 0.26±0.05a | 0.41±0.07a | 0.77±0.13a | 1.50±0.46a | 3.92±1.39a | 10.06±1.75a |
300 | 0.21±0.04b | 0.32±0.06b | 0.48±0.22b | 0.72±0.11b | 2.02±0.28b | 4.10±0.65b |
600 | 0.20±0.04b | 0.33±0.10b | 0.47±0.13b | 0.47±0.11c | 1.09±0.29c | 2.03±0.36c |
900 | 0.22±0.05b | 0.31±0.05bc | 0.38±0.10c | 0.33±0.08cd | 0.57±0.14d | 0.98±0.12d |
1 200 | 0.21±0.04b | 0.32±0.06bc | 0.31±0.09c | 0.32±0.08d | 0.37±0.09d | 0.64±0.13d |
1 500 | 0.13±0.03c | 0.27±0.06c | 0.33±0.08c | 0.33±0.09cd | 0.36±0.03d | 0.47±0.10d |
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 0.34±0.12a | 0.62±0.16a | 0.83±0.21a | 0.83±0.19a | 1.11±0.21a | 1.40±0.27a |
300 | 0.16±0.05c | 0.26±0.10bc | 0.28±0.07b | 0.27±0.08b | 0.27±0.05b | 0.34±0.07b |
600 | 0.23±0.08b | 0.29±0.08b | 0.30±0.07b | 0.28±0.07b | 0.29±0.08b | 0.33±0.08b |
900 | 0.15±0.08c | 0.21±0.07c | 0.26±0.07b | 0.30±0.07b | 0.32±0.07b | 0.31±0.09b |
1 200 | 0.12±0.07c | 0.21±0.05c | 0.25±0.06b | 0.28±0.08b | 0.26±0.06b | 0.26±0.07b |
1 500 | 0.15±0.06c | 0.19±0.03c | 0.22±0.05b | 0.26±0.06b | 0.29±0.06b | 0.32±0.06b |
表4 不同浓度二甲戊灵下龙葵叶面积变化
Tab.4 The effect of pendimethalin on the leaf area of Solanum nigrum L.(cm2)
浓度 Concentration (g.a.i/hm2) | 药后时间Post-herbicides time | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 25 d | 30 d | |
0 | 0.34±0.12a | 0.62±0.16a | 0.83±0.21a | 0.83±0.19a | 1.11±0.21a | 1.40±0.27a |
300 | 0.16±0.05c | 0.26±0.10bc | 0.28±0.07b | 0.27±0.08b | 0.27±0.05b | 0.34±0.07b |
600 | 0.23±0.08b | 0.29±0.08b | 0.30±0.07b | 0.28±0.07b | 0.29±0.08b | 0.33±0.08b |
900 | 0.15±0.08c | 0.21±0.07c | 0.26±0.07b | 0.30±0.07b | 0.32±0.07b | 0.31±0.09b |
1 200 | 0.12±0.07c | 0.21±0.05c | 0.25±0.06b | 0.28±0.08b | 0.26±0.06b | 0.26±0.07b |
1 500 | 0.15±0.06c | 0.19±0.03c | 0.22±0.05b | 0.26±0.06b | 0.29±0.06b | 0.32±0.06b |
图2 不同浓度二甲戊灵下龙葵生理指标变化 注:2-1为二甲戊灵对龙葵叶绿素含量的影响;2-2为二甲戊灵对龙葵可溶性糖含量的影响;2-3为二甲戊灵对龙葵可溶性蛋白含量的影响。图中数值0、300、600、900、1 200、1 500分别表示喷施二甲戊灵浓度为0、300、600、900、1 200、1 500 g.a.i./hm2,小写字母表示在0.05水平下差异显著。
Fig.2 Effect of Pendimethalin on the physiological indicators of Solanum nigrum L. Note: 2-1 is the effect of pendimethalin on the chlorophyll content of Solanum nigrum L.;2-2 is the effect of pendimethalin on the soluble sugar content of Solanum nigrum L.;2-3 is the effect of pendimethalin on the soluble protein content of Solanum nigrum L.Values 0, 300, 600, 900, 1,200, 1,500 in the figure indicate that the spraying pendimethalin concentration is 0, 300, 600, 900, 1,200, 1,500 g.a.i/hm2, and lowercase letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level.
[1] |
CHUN Z Z, CHEN J Y. Novel α-Tubulin Mutations Conferring Resistance to Dinitroaniline Herbicides in Lolium rigidum[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 1-12.
DOI URL |
[2] | Breeden S M, Brosnan J T, Breeden G K, et al. Controlling Dinitroaniline-Resistant Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) in Turfgrass[J]. Weed Technology, 2017, 31(6): 12-16. |
[3] |
Chen J Y, Yu Q, Patterson E, et al. Dinitroaniline Herbicide Resistance and Mechanisms in Weeds[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 634018-634018.
DOI URL |
[4] | 连玉朱, 王金信, 李浙江, 等. 几种棉田除草剂大田防除效果及其对棉花的安全性测定[J]. 农药, 2006,(4): 270-271,277. |
LIAN Yuzhu, WANG Jinxin, LI Zhejiang, et al. Field control effect of several herbicides in cotton field and their safety to cotton[J]. Agrochemicals, 2006,(4): 270-271,277. | |
[5] | 赵冰梅, 朱玉永, 王林. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵混配使用对棉田杂草的防除效果及棉花安全性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(3): 250-255,264. |
ZHAO Bingmei, ZHU Yuyong, WANG Lin. Control effect of mixed use of flumioxazin and pendimethalin on weed in cotton fields and safety to cotton[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2021, 47(3): 250-255,264. | |
[6] | 朱玉永, 赵冰梅, 王林. 新疆棉田杂草发生与防除现状及对策[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(2): 1-7. |
ZHU Yuyong, ZHAO Bingmei, WANG Lin. Current status of weed occurrence and control in cotton field of Xinjiang and its countermeasures[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(2): 1-7. | |
[7] | 冯宏祖, 王兰. 新疆南部棉区棉田杂草调查[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008,(7): 2819-2820,2986. |
FENG Hongzhu, WANG Lan. Investigation on weeds in cotton fields in southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008,(7): 2819-2820,2986. | |
[8] | 郝彦俊, 李广阔, 王剑, 等. 新疆棉田杂草发生及防治[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2003,(1): 24-25. |
HAO Yanjun, LI Guangkuo, WANG Jian. Occurrence and control of weeds in cotton fields in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2003,(1): 24-25. | |
[9] | 黄红娟, 张朝贤, 姜翠兰, 等. 北疆棉田杂草多样性及群落组成[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(1): 7-13. |
HUANG Hongjun, ZHANG Chaoxian, JIANG Cuilan, et al. Diversity and community composition of weeds in cotton fields of northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(1): 7-13. | |
[10] | 蒋成国, 刘彤, 张建萍, 等. 滴灌下新疆北部棉田杂草土壤种子库的时空变化[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6): 3081-3089. |
JIANG Chenguo, LIU Tong, ZHANG Jianping, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of weed seed banks under drip irrigation in cotton fields of Northern Xinjiang[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(6): 3081-3089. | |
[11] | 张强, 李红, 赵冰梅, 等. 新疆兵团机采棉田杂草种类及群落结构调查[J]. 杂草学报, 2021, 39(1): 29-37. |
ZHANG Qiang, LI Hong, ZHAO Bingmei, et al. Investigation on weed species and community structure in cotton field of Xinjiang Corps[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2021, 39(1): 29-37. | |
[12] | 张强, 田英, 朱玉永, 等. 新疆兵团主要植棉区机采棉田杂草调查[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(5): 13-16. |
ZHANG Qiang, TIAN Ying, ZHU Yuyong, et al. Investigation on weeds in mechanical cotton fields in main cotton planting areas of Xinjiang Corps[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(5): 13-16. | |
[13] | 魏建华, 张建云, 马冬梅. 新疆昌吉州棉田杂草发生演替规律调查研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2016, 43(1): 31-33. |
WEI Jianhua, ZHANG Jianyun, MA Dongmei. Investigation and study on law of succession of weeds in cotton fields in Changji, Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2016, 43(1): 31-33. | |
[14] | 赵冰梅, 朱玉永, 张强. 乙氧氟草醚和二甲戊灵防除覆膜棉田龙葵效果[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(8): 616-618. |
ZHAO Bingmei, ZHU Yuyong, ZHANG Qiang. Efficacy of oxyfluorfen and pendimethalian on Solanum nigrum in film covered cotton field[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(8): 616-618. | |
[15] | 谢桂英, 游秀峰, 孙淑君, 等. 龙葵种子休眠解除方法研究[J]. 杂草科学, 2013, 31(1): 37-39. |
XIE Guiying, YOU Xiufeng, SUN Shujun, et al. Research on the method of solving dormancy of Solanum nigrum L.Seed[J]. Weeds Science, 2013, 31(1): 37-39. | |
[16] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
LI Hesheng. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. | |
[17] | 刘阳. 两种苯氧羧酸类除草剂对谷子生理特性及安全性的影响[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2016. |
LIU Yang. Effects of two phenoxycarboxylic herbicides on physiological characteristics and safety of foxtail millet[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[18] | Song N, Yang Z, Zhou L, et al. Effect of dissolved organic matter on the toxicity of chlorotoluron to Triticumae stivum[J]. Journal of Environmental Science, 2006, 18(1): 101-108. |
[19] | 王丹. 适于大蒜茎叶处理的除草剂筛选及其生理效应研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2018. |
WANG Dan. Screening of herbicides suitable for garlic stem and leaf treatment and their physiological effects[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[20] | 徐汉虹. 植物化学保护[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 197-198. |
XU Hanhong. Plant Chemical Protection[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007: 197-198. | |
[21] |
张少逸, 张朝贤, 王金信, 等. 五种土壤处理除草剂对刺萼龙葵的生物活性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2012, 27(S1): 382-385.
DOI |
ZHANG Shaoyi, ZHANG Chaoxian, WANG Jinxing, et al. Study on biological activities of five herbicides for soil treatment to Solanum rostratum Dunal[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2012, 27(S1): 382-385. | |
[22] | 刘韶光. 氟乐灵和二甲戊灵对谷子安全性及田间杂草防效的研究[D]. 晋中: 山西农业大学, 2019. |
LIU Shaoguang. Study on the safety of trifluralin and pendimethalin to millet and the control effect of weeds in the field[D]. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[23] | 赵江涛, 李晓峰, 李航, 等. 可溶性糖在高等植物代谢调节中的生理作用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 4(24): 6423-6425,6427. |
ZHAO Jiangtao, LI Xiaofeng, LI Hang, et al. The physiological role of soluble sugar in metabolic regulation of higher plants[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 4(24): 6423-6425,6427. | |
[24] | 武辉, 张巨松, 石俊毅, 等. 棉花幼苗对不同程度低温逆境的生理响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2013, 33(1): 74-82. |
WU Hui, ZHANG Jusong, SHI Junyi, et al. Physiological response of cotton seedlings to different degree of low temperature stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2013, 33(1): 74-82. | |
[25] | 王正贵, 周立云, 郭文善, 等. 除草剂对小麦光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2011, 30(6): 1037-1043. |
WANG Zhenggui, ZHOU Liyun, GUO Wenshsn, et al. Effects of herbicides on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of wheat[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2011, 30(6): 1037-1043.
DOI URL |
|
[26] | 李贵, 吴竞仑. 除草剂对作物生理生化指标的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2007,(29): 9157-9159. |
LI Gui, WU Jinglong. Effect of herbicide on crop physiology and biochemistry[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(29): 9157-9159. | |
[27] | 彭俊, 宋志龙, 孟新刚, 等. 除草剂对藨草生理生化指标的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2013, 22(9): 192-197. |
PENG Jun, SONG Zhilong, MENG Xingang, et al. The effect of herbicides on physiological and biochemical indexes of Scirpus triqueter L.[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2013, 22(9): 192-197. | |
[28] | 朱诗禹, 崔娟, 徐伟, 等. 精异丙甲草胺苗前封闭处理对大豆苗期生长及其生理生化指标的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2016, 43(4): 677-682. |
ZHU Shiyu, CUI Juan, XU Wei, et al. Effect of the treatment with S-metolachlor befor seeding emergence on the soybean growth and physiological and biochemical indexes[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 2016, 43(4): 677-682. | |
[29] | 钱兰娟, 袁树忠, 高颜. 除草剂炔草酯对不同小麦品种幼苗期叶片抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(5): 674-679. |
QIAN Lanjuan, YUAN Shuzhong, GAO Yan. Effects of the herbicide Clodinafop-propargyl on the anti-oxidant characteristics of different wheat cultivars at the seedling stage[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2014, 34(5): 674-679. |
[1] | 陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[2] | 宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
[3] | 鞠乐, 齐军仓, 陈培育, 牛银亭, 阴志刚. 干旱胁迫对大麦种子萌发、幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886. |
[4] | 王冠玉, 贾平平, 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 樊丁宇, 赵晓梅, 郝庆, 杨磊, 耿文娟. 高温胁迫对枣花器官生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1485-1491. |
[5] | 陈艳, 黄璐瑶, 邓昌蓉, 张彦君, 侯全刚, 邵登魁. 冷害对多茸毛型线辣椒幼苗生理水平的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1492-1498. |
[6] | 刘衍晨, 刘志刚, 白新慧, 乔鹏, 徐诚, 白慧敏, 张娟. 蛭石复混基质对辣椒育苗的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1190-1199. |
[7] | 李家辉, 赵晓钰, 李海英, 张俐华, 张杰, 魏彦, 周军, 赵全庄, 李宗福. 也迷离鸡生长发育规律及体重体尺的相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1281-1291. |
[8] | 彭增莹, 张巨松, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 贺宏伟, 刘群, 郭仁松. 氮肥与缩节胺对机采棉生长发育及氮素分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 781-789. |
[9] | 程利华, 杨红兰, 马清倩, 史莹, 张大伟, Alisher A. Abdullaev, 张道远. 陆地棉种质黄萎病抗性生理鉴定分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 992-1002. |
[10] | 周小云, 张军高, 周佳玉, 李进, 秦冰霜, 梁晶, 龚静云, 雷斌. 三种植物提取物对棉花种子发芽及幼苗生长影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2902-2910. |
[11] | 孙明辉, 阿依努尔·卡依木, 翟梦华, 代健敏, 张巨松. 雹灾重播条件下不同棉花品种生长发育、产量及品质的差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2667-2673. |
[12] | 吕亮雨, 樊光辉, 付全, 苏彩风, 李发毅. 生物有机肥对枸杞生长及土壤性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2779-2789. |
[13] | 吴莉莉, 钱涛, 陈艳, 吾买尔江·拜克力, 李广阔, 丁瑞丰. 二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺对棉田一年生杂草的防治效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797. |
[14] | 李欣欣, 赵强, 王为, 马春梅, 阿里木·阿木力, 占东霞, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 李广维, 田阳青. 0.1%噻苯隆复配不同外源物质对化学打顶棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2371-2379. |
[15] | 黄小双, 李海峰, 胡西旦·买买提, 热西旦·阿木提, 刘志刚, 任红松, 石书兵, 张雨. 不同果树花生间作模式对花生生长发育、叶片生理特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2433-2441. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||