新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.019

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (9): 2239-2247.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.019

新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价

宋冰梅¹^,²(), 姜岩², 陈鑫²^,³, 张宇⁴, 程宛楠⁴, 潘洪生²()

1.新疆大学生命科学与技术学院/新疆生物资源和基因工程重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830046
2.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/国家植物保护库尔勒观测实验站,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆农业大学农学院/棉花教育部工程研究中心,乌鲁木齐 830052
4.中国农业科学院植物保护研究所/植物病虫害生物学国家重点实验室,北京 100193

收稿日期:2022-12-10 出版日期:2023-09-20 发布日期:2023-09-19
通信作者: 潘洪生(1982-),男,黑龙江肇东人,研究员,博士,研究方向为转基因作物安全性评价,(E-mail)panhongsheng0715@163.com
作者简介:宋冰梅(1999-),女,四川自贡人,硕士研究生,研究方向为转基因作物安全性评价,(E-mail)2446620106@qq.com
基金资助:
农业科技创新稳定支持项目(xjnkywdzc-2022004);新疆维吾尔自治区天山英才培养计划(2022TSYCCX0086);新疆棉花产业技术体系库尔勒综合试验站;新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育专项(xjkcpy-2020004)

Evaluation of saline/alkali tolerance of new transgenic High-Yield cotton at germination and seedling stages

SONG Bingmei¹^,²(), JIANG Yan², CHEN Xin²^,³, ZHANG Yu⁴, CHENG Wannan⁴, PAN Hongsheng²()

1. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Biological Resources and Genetic Engineering/ College of Life Science and Technology, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
2. National Plant Protection Scientific Observation and Experiment Station in Korla/Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. Engineering Research Center of Cotton, Ministry of Education/College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
4. State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests/Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China

Received:2022-12-10 Online:2023-09-20 Published:2023-09-19
Correspondence author: PAN Hongsheng (1982-), male, native place: Zhaodong, Heilongjiang Province, researcher, master tutor, research direction for safety evaluation of transgenic crops, (E- mail) panhongsheng0715@163.com
Supported by:
Stable Support to Agricultural Sci-Tech Renovation(xjnkywdzc-2022004);Project Tianshan Talent Cultivation Plan of Xinjiang Autonomous Region(2022TSYCCX0086);Korla Comprehensive Experimental Station of Xinjiang Cotton Industry Technology System;Special Incubation Project of Science & Technology Renovation of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjkcpy-2020004)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究盐/碱胁迫对新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期生长发育的影响并对其耐盐性与耐碱性进行评价。【方法】以转Bn-csRRM2基因高产棉花HN9311和亲本对照中棉所12号(CCRI-12)为研究对象,在盐胁迫(150 mmol/L NaCl)和碱胁迫(70 mmol/L NaHCO₃)下,统计和分析生长发育相关指标及差异。【结果】与对照相比,除真叶数和根冠比以外,在盐胁迫和碱胁迫下HN9311萌发期和苗期各项直接指标均显著下降;除萌发期碱胁迫下相对下胚轴长和相对发芽指数以及苗期碱胁迫下相对根冠比以外,HN9311萌发期和苗期各项相对指标均显著低于或等于中棉所12号;HN9311萌发期相对盐/碱害率分别为27.00%、21.00%,中棉所12号分别为22.75%、23.00%,HN9311相对盐害率显著大于中棉所12号。【结论】盐/碱胁迫对HN9311萌发期和苗期生长发育均具有显著的抑制作用,与盐胁迫相比其苗期对碱胁迫更为敏感,萌发期耐盐胁迫能力和苗期耐盐/碱胁迫能力均低于中棉所12号。

关键词: HN9311; 萌发期; 苗期; 生长发育; 耐盐/碱性评价

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study aims to explore the effects of saline/alkali stress on the growth and development of new transgenic high-yield cotton at germination stage and seedling stage, and evaluate its saline/alkali tolerance. 【Methods】 In this project, transgenic Bn-csRRM2 high-yield cotton HN9311 and CCRI-12 (parent control) were used as study materials, the values and differences of growth and development related indexes were calculated and analyzed under saline stress (150 mmol/L NaCl) and alkali stress (70 mmol/L NaHCO₃). 【Results】 Except the number of true leaves and root/shoot, the other direct indexes of HN9311 at germination stage and seedling stage significantly decreased under saline stress and alkali stress when compared with those of CCRI-12; Except for relative hypocotyl length and relative germination index under alkali stress at germination stage, and relative root/shoot under alkali stress at seedling stage, the other relative indexes of HN9311 at germination and seedling stages were significantly lower than or equal to those of CCRI-12; The relative saline/alkali damage rates of HN9311 at germination stage were 27.00% and 21.00%, and those of CCRI-12 were 22.75% and 23.00%. The relative saline damage rate of HN9311was significantly higher than that of CCRI-12. 【Conclusion】 Saline/alkali stress has a significant inhibitory effect on the growth and development of HN9311 at germination stage and seedling stage. HN9311 is more sensitive to alkali stress at seedling stage when compared with saline stress, saline tolerance at germination stage and saline/alkali tolerance at seedling stage were lower than those of CCRI-12.

Key words: HN9311; germination stage; seedling stage; growth and development; saline/alkali tolerance evaluation

中图分类号:

S512

宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.

SONG Bingmei, JIANG Yan, CHEN Xin, ZHANG Yu, CHENG Wannan, PAN Hongsheng. Evaluation of saline/alkali tolerance of new transgenic High-Yield cotton at germination and seedling stages[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.

图/表 5

表1 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311萌发期直接指标变化

Tab.1 Effects of saline/alkali stress on the direct index of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at germination stage

直接指标 Direct index	盐胁迫 Saline stress		碱胁迫 Alkali stress
直接指标 Direct index	0 mmol/L NaCl (CK)	150 mmol/L NaCl	0 mmol/L NaHCO₃ (CK)	70 mmol/L NaHCO₃
鲜重量Fresh weight(g)	0.36±0.01^a	0.26±0.01^b	0.36±0.01^a	0.26±0.01^b
下胚轴长Hypocotyl length(cm)	1.72±0.05^a	1.41±0.14^b	1.70±0.03^a	1.37±0.02^b
根长Root length(cm)	4.43±0.05^a	2.22±0.08^b	4.31±0.04^a	0.00±0.00^c
发芽势Germination potential(%)	66.25±0.48^a	27.50±0.29^c	67.50±0.29^a	43.00±0.91^b
发芽率Germination rate(%)	98.25±0.48^a	72.00±0.82^c	98.25±0.48^a	78.00±0.00^b
发芽指数Germination index	95.42±0.19^a	56.40±0.48^c	95.85±0.13^a	71.04±0.33^b
活力指数Vigor index	34.26±0.59^a	14.92±0.68^c	33.80±0.62^a	18.03±0.40^b

表2 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311苗期直接指标变化

Tab.2 Effects of saline/alkali stress on the direct index of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at seedling stage

直接指标 Direct index	盐胁迫 Saline stress		碱胁迫 Alkali stress
直接指标 Direct index	0 mmol/L NaCl (CK)	150 mmol/L NaCl	0 mmol/L NaHCO₃ (CK)	70 mmol/L NaHCO₃
真叶数Number of true leaves	3.75±0.25^ab	3.25±0.25^b	4.00±0.00^a	2.25±0.08^c
株高Plant height(cm)	15.00±0.41^a	14.00±0.00^b	15.80±0.15^a	9.93±0.38^c
根长Root length(cm)	21.63±0.38^a	14.00±0.41^b	21.70±0.10^a	9.83±0.94^c
根鲜重Root fresh weight(g)	2.57±0.02^a	1.93±0.05^b	2.55±0.05^a	1.56±0.05^c
地上部鲜重Shoot fresh weight(g)	5.28±0.06^a	3.33±0.06^b	5.23±0.03^a	2.10±0.10^c
鲜重量Fresh weight(g)	7.85±0.04^a	5.25±0.10^b	7.78±0.09^a	3.66±0.15^c
根冠比Root/shoot	0.49±0.01^c	0.58±0.01^b	0.49±0.01^c	0.74±0.01^a

表3 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311萌发期相对指标变化

Tab.3 Effects of saline/alkali stress on the relative index of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at germination stage

相对指标 Relative index	盐胁迫 Saline stress		碱胁迫 Alkali stress
相对指标 Relative index	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311
相对鲜重量Relative fresh weight	0.86±0.02^*	0.74±0.03	0.95±0.0 $1 * *$	0.72±0.02
相对下胚轴长Relative hypocotyl length	0.98±0.02	0.82±0.08	0.73±0.01	0.81±0.0 $1 * *$
相对根长Relative root length	0.56±0.03	0.50±0.02	0.28±0.00	0.28±0.01
相对发芽势Relative germination potential	0.56±0.0 $1 * *$	0.42±0.00	0.65±0.01	0.64±0.01
相对发芽率Relative germination rate	0.77±0.0 $1 * *$	0.73±0.01	0.78±0.00	0.79±0.00
相对发芽指数Relative germination index	0.70±0.0 $1 * *$	0.59±0.00	0.72±0.00	0.74±0.00^*
相对活力指数 Relative vigor index	0.60±0.0 $1 * *$	0.43±0.02	0.68±0.01	0.53±0.01

表3 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311萌发期相对指标变化

Tab.3 Effects of saline/alkali stress on the relative index of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at germination stage

相对指标 Relative index	盐胁迫 Saline stress		碱胁迫 Alkali stress
相对指标 Relative index	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311
相对鲜重量Relative fresh weight	0.86±0.02^*	0.74±0.03	0.95±0.0 $1 * *$	0.72±0.02
相对下胚轴长Relative hypocotyl length	0.98±0.02	0.82±0.08	0.73±0.01	0.81±0.0 $1 * *$
相对根长Relative root length	0.56±0.03	0.50±0.02	0.28±0.00	0.28±0.01
相对发芽势Relative germination potential	0.56±0.0 $1 * *$	0.42±0.00	0.65±0.01	0.64±0.01
相对发芽率Relative germination rate	0.77±0.0 $1 * *$	0.73±0.01	0.78±0.00	0.79±0.00
相对发芽指数Relative germination index	0.70±0.0 $1 * *$	0.59±0.00	0.72±0.00	0.74±0.00^*
相对活力指数 Relative vigor index	0.60±0.0 $1 * *$	0.43±0.02	0.68±0.01	0.53±0.01

表4 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311苗期相对指标变化

Tab.4 Effects of saline/alkali stress on the relative index of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at seedling stage

相对指标 Relative index	盐胁迫 Saline stress		碱胁迫 Alkali stress
相对指标 Relative index	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311
相对真叶数Relative true leaf number	0.89±0.00	0.87±0.07	0.56±0.02	0.60±0.02
相对株高Relative plant height	0.95±0.03	0.93±0.00	0.77±0.01^*	0.66±0.03
相对根长Relative root length	0.60±0.01	0.65±0.02	0.59±0.03	0.46±0.04
相对根鲜重Relative root fresh weight	0.90±0.0 $0 * *$	0.75±0.02	0.86±0.0 $0 * *$	0.61±0.02
相对地上部鲜重Relative shoot fresh weight	0.87±0.07^*	0.63±0.01	0.75±0.0 $1 * *$	0.40±0.02
相对鲜重量Relative fresh weight	0.88±0.0 $4 * *$	0.67±0.01	0.79±0.0 $1 * *$	0.47±0.02
相对根冠比Relative root/shoot	1.06±0.09	1.19±0.03	1.14±0.01	1.53±0.0 $3 * *$

表4 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311苗期相对指标变化

Tab.4 Effects of saline/alkali stress on the relative index of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at seedling stage

相对指标 Relative index	盐胁迫 Saline stress		碱胁迫 Alkali stress
相对指标 Relative index	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311	中棉所12号 CCRI-12	HN9311
相对真叶数Relative true leaf number	0.89±0.00	0.87±0.07	0.56±0.02	0.60±0.02
相对株高Relative plant height	0.95±0.03	0.93±0.00	0.77±0.01^*	0.66±0.03
相对根长Relative root length	0.60±0.01	0.65±0.02	0.59±0.03	0.46±0.04
相对根鲜重Relative root fresh weight	0.90±0.0 $0 * *$	0.75±0.02	0.86±0.0 $0 * *$	0.61±0.02
相对地上部鲜重Relative shoot fresh weight	0.87±0.07^*	0.63±0.01	0.75±0.0 $1 * *$	0.40±0.02
相对鲜重量Relative fresh weight	0.88±0.0 $4 * *$	0.67±0.01	0.79±0.0 $1 * *$	0.47±0.02
相对根冠比Relative root/shoot	1.06±0.09	1.19±0.03	1.14±0.01	1.53±0.0 $3 * *$

图1 盐/碱胁迫下新型转基因高产棉花HN9311萌发期相对盐/碱害率变化注:*、ns分别代表HN9311与中棉所12号相对盐害率具有(P<0.05)或不具有(P>0.05)显著性差异(独立样本T检验法检验)

Fig.1 Effects of saline/alkali stress on relative saline/alkali damage rate of new transgenic high-yield cotton HN9311 at germination stage Note:* and ns respectively represent significant difference (P<0.05) or not represent significant difference (P>0.05) for the relative saline damage rate between HN9311 and CCRI-12 (independent sample T test)

参考文献 51

[1]	Guo J X, Lu X Y, Tao Y F, et al. Comparative ionomics and metabolic responses and adaptive strategies of cotton to salt and alkali stress[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13: 871387. DOI URL
[2]	陆宴辉, 梁革梅, 张永军, 等. 二十一世纪以来棉花害虫治理成就与展望[J]. 应用昆虫学报, 2020, 57(3): 477-490.
	LU Yanhui, LIANG Gemei, ZHANG Yongjun, et al. Advances in the management of insect pests of cotton in China since the 21st century[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology, 2020, 57(3): 477-490.
[3]	Abdelraheem A, Kuraparthy V, Hinze L, et al. Genome-wide association study for tolerance to drought and salt tolerance and resistance to thrips at the seedling growth stage in US upland cotton[J]. Industrial Crops & Products, 2021, 169: 113645.
[4]	Zhang M, Zheng X L, Song S Q, et al. Spatiotemporal manipulation of auxin biosynthesis in cotton ovule epidermal cells enhances fiber yield and quality[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2011, 29(5): 453-461. DOI PMID
[5]	Sun F, Liu C L, Zhang C J, et al. A conserved RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain of brassica napus FCA improves cotton fiber quality and yield by regulating cell size[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2012, 30(1): 93-101. DOI URL
[6]	雒珺瑜, 刘传亮, 张帅, 等. 转RRM2基因棉生长势和产量及对棉田节肢动物群落的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 38(7): 785-794.
	LUO Junyu, LIU Chuanliang, ZHANG Shuai, et al. Growth vigor and yield of transgenic RRM2 (RNA recognition motif 2) cotton and their effects on arthropod community in cotton field[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 38(7): 785-794.
[7]	刘小玲, 徐道青, 王维, 等. 转RRM2和ACO2-E6基因棉花冠层特征和光合特性与产量形成的关系[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(6): 628-634.
	LIU Xiaoling, XU Daoqing, WANG Wei, et al. Relationship of canopy properties and photosynthetic characteristics with construction of lint yield in transgenic RRM2 and ACO2-E6 cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(6): 628-634.
[8]	Zhu G Z, Gao W W, Song X H, et al. Genome-wide association reveals genetic variation of lint yield components under salty field conditions in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20(1): 23. DOI
[9]	Qadir M, Quillérou E, Nangia V, et al. Economics of salt-induced land degradation and restoration[J]. In Natural Resources Forum, 2014, 38(4): 282-295. DOI URL
[10]	王俊铎, 黎玉华, 龚照龙, 等. 棉花耐盐性研究进展[J]. 棉花科学, 2021, 43(5): 3-10.
	WANG Junduo, LI Yuhua, GONG Zhaolong, et al. Research progresses on salt tolerance of cotton[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2021, 43(5): 3-10.
[11]	Zẽrb C, Geilfus C M, Dietz K J. Salinity and crop yield[J]. Plant Biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2019,(S1): 31-38.
[12]	Liang W, Cui W, Ma X, et al. Function of wheat Ta-UnP gene in enhancing salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis and rice[J]. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2014, 450(1): 794-801. DOI PMID
[13]	Ashraf J, Zuo D, Wang Q, et al. Recent insights into cotton functional genomics: progress and future perspectives[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2018, 16(3): 699-713. DOI PMID
[14]	Ullah A, Sun H, et al. Drought coping strategies in cotton: increased crop per drop[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, 15(3): 271-284. DOI PMID
[15]	Li W H, Wang Z H, Zhang J Z, et al. Soil salinity variations and cotton growth under long-term mulched drip irrigation in saline-alkali land of arid oasis[J]. Irrigation Science, 2022, 40: 103-113. DOI
[16]	Mottaleb S A, Darwish E, Mostafa M, et al. Phenotyping root system architecture of cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) grown under salinity[J]. Agriculture/Pol'nohospodárstvo, 2017, 63(4): 142-150.
[17]	许艳超. 复合盐碱胁迫下半野生棉抗性评价与调控机理初步分析[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2017.
	XU Yanchao. Primary studies on integrated evaluation and regulated mechanism of semi-wild cotton under complex salt-alkali stress[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2017.
[18]	马盼盼, 赵曾强, 祝建波, 等. 棉花耐旱耐盐碱生理和分子机制研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 23(2): 27-36.
	MA Panpan, ZHAO Zengqiang, ZHU Jiangbo, et al. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of drought and salt tolerance in cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2020, 23(2): 27-36.
[19]	苏莹, 郭安慧, 华金平. 棉花耐盐性鉴定方法探讨[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(12): 11-19.
	SU Ying, GUO Anhui, HUA Jinping. Strategies for evaluation the salt tolerance in cotton[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(12): 11-19.
[20]	庞学兵, 王朝阳, 王爱英, 等. 根际促生菌对棉苗盐碱胁迫的缓解效应[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(1): 101-109.
	PANG Xuebing, WANG Chaoyang, WANG Aiying, et al. Mitigative effect PGPR cotton seedings subjected to salt-alkaline stress[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2017, 26(1): 101-109.
[21]	赵云丽, 李刚, 修伟明, 等. 非抗虫转基因棉花对土壤细菌群落多样性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(4): 716-721.
	ZHAO Yunli, LI Gang, XIU Weiming, et al. Effects of insect non-resistant transgenic cottons on bacterial community diversity in soil[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015, 34(4): 716-721.
[22]	李淑英, 朱加保, 路献勇, 等. 转RRM2基因棉田昆虫群落多样性及其时序动态[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(11): 1190-1203. DOI
	LI Shuying, ZHU Jiabao, LU Xianyong, et al. The diversity of insect communities and its dynamic changes in transgenic RRM2(RNA recognition motif 2) cotton fields[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2018, 26(11): 1190-1203. DOI
[23]	付媛媛, 江晓慧, 申孝军, 等. 盐胁迫下棉花幼苗叶片K⁺、Na⁺含量与光合参数的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(6): 1716-1722.
	FU Yuanyuan, JIANG Xiaohui, SHEN Xiaojun, et al. The relationship between foliar K⁺ and Na⁺ concentrations and photosynthetic parameters of cotton seedlings under salt stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(6): 1716-1722.
[24]	张国伟, 路海玲, 张雷, 等. 棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(8): 2045-2053.
	ZHANG Guowei, LU Hailing, ZHANG Lei, et al. Salt tolerance evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)at its germinating and seedling stages and selection of related indices[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(8): 2045-2053. PMID
[25]	Guo R, Shi L X, Yang C W, et al. Comparison of ionomic and metabolites response under alkali stress in old and young leaves of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 25(7): 1785.
[26]	Xu Y, Magwanga Ro, Yang X, et al. Genetic regulatory networks for salt-alkali stress in Gossypium hirsutum with differing morphological characteristics[J]. BMC Genomics, 2020, 21(1): 15. DOI
[27]	Zhang G W, Liu R X, Yang C Q, et al. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method based on entropy weight theory in evaluation of salt tolerance of cotton[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2014, 15(9): 1441-1445.
[28]	Manikandan A, Sahu D K, Blaise D, et al. Cotton response to differential salt stress[J]. International Journal of Agriculture Science, 2019, 11(6): 8059-8065.
[29]	刘瑞显, 张国伟, 杨长琴. 基于熵权理论的灰色关联度法在棉花耐盐性评价中的应用[J]. 核农学报, 2017, 31(2): 402-409. DOI
	LIU Ruixian, ZHANG Guowei, YANG Changqin. Using gray related degree method based on entropy weight theory to evaluate salt tolerance of cotton[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 31(2): 402-409. DOI
[30]	赵康, 杨涛, 王红刚, 等. 42个新疆海岛棉品种萌发期耐盐性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, 38(5): 27-33.
	ZHAO Kang, YANG Tao, WANG Honggang, et al. Evaluation on salt tolerance of 42 sea-lsland cotton (Gossypium barbadense) varieties in Xinjiang during germination period[J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 27-33.
[31]	ZHeng J Y, Zhang Z L, Gong Z L, et al. Genome-wide association analysis of salt-tolerant traits in terrestrial cotton at seedling stage. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2021, 11(1): 97-120.
[32]	谢志霞, 李茂营, 杜明伟, 等. 冠菌素对棉花幼苗盐害的缓解效应[J]. 棉花学报, 2020, 24(6): 511-517.
	XIE Zhixia, LI Maoying, DU Mingwei, et al. Ameliorating effect of the phytotoxin coronatine on seedlings of transgenic insect-resistant cotton variety under salt stress[J]. Cotton Science, 2020, 24(6): 511-517.
[33]	马宏秀, 王开勇, 张开祥, 等. 棉粕对盐碱胁迫下棉花生理及生长补偿效应[J]. 植物学报, 2019, 54(2): 208-216. DOI
	MA Hongxiu, WANG Kaiyong, ZHANG Kaixiang, et al. Effect of cottonseed meal on cotton physiology and growth compensation under salinity-alkalinity stress[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(2): 208-216.
[34]	Mai W X, Tian C Y, Li C J. Soil salinity dynamics under drip irrigation and mulch film and their effects on cotton root length[J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2013, 44(9): 1489-1502. DOI URL
[35]	Chen W L, Jin M G, FERRÉ T, et al. Soil conditions affect cotton root distribution and cotton yield under mulched drip irrigation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 249: 107743. DOI URL
[36]	Min W, Guo H J, Zhou G W, et al. Root distribution and growth of cotton as affected by drip irrigation with saline water[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014, 169: 1-10. DOI URL
[37]	叶武威, 庞念厂, 王俊娟, 等. 盐胁迫下棉花体内Na⁺的积累、分配及耐盐机制研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2006, 33(5): 279-283.
	YE Wuwei, PANG Nianchang, WANG Junjuan, et al. Characteristics of absorbing, accumulating and distribution of Na⁺ under the salinity stress on cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2006, 33(5): 279-283.
[38]	Gupta B, Huang B R. Mechanism of salinity tolerance in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular characterization[J]. Corporation International Journal of Genomics, 2014, 2014: 701596.
[39]	Yin Z P, Zhang H, Zhao Q, et al. Physiological and comparative proteomic analyses of saline-alkali NaHCO3-responses in leaves of halophyte Puccinellia Tenuiflora[J]. Plant Soil, 2019, 437(1-2): 137-158. DOI
[40]	苏孟杞. 陆地棉对NaCl、Na₂CO₃及NaHCO₃的耐性鉴定[D]. 南宁: 广西大学, 2015.
	SU Mengqi. Salt tolerance identification of upland cotton Nacl, Na₂CO₃ and NaHCO₃[D]. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2015.
[41]	辛承松, 罗振, 孔祥强, 等. 不同基因型陆地棉亲本及其杂交后代的耐盐性差异[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(3): 235-240.
	XIN Chengsong, LUO Zhen, KONG Xiangqiang, et al. Salt tolerant variation among parents of different genotype upland cotton and their hybrids[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(3): 235-240.
[42]	徐婷, 柳延涛, 王海江, 等. 盐碱胁迫对花生种子发芽特性影响及盐害综合鉴定评价[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2022, 44(5): 1037-1047. DOI
	XU Ting, LIU Yantao, WANG Haijiang, et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on germination characteristics of peanut seeds and comprehensive identification and evaluation of salt damage[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2022, 44(5): 1037-1047. DOI
[43]	王立红, 孙影影, 李星星, 等. 水杨酸浸种对NaCl胁迫下棉花种子萌发和幼苗根系生长的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2016, 21(4): 10-17.
	WANG Lihong, SUN Yingying, LI Xingxing, et al. Effects of salicylic acid soaking on seed germination and root growth of cotton under salt stress[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016, 21(4): 10-17.
[44]	白灯莎·买买提艾力, 张少民, 孙良斌, 等. 新疆不同年代27个棉花品种(系)种子萌发阶段耐盐能力比较[J]. 西北农业学报, 2012, 21(1): 72-79.
	Baidengsha Maimaitiaili, ZHANG Shaomin, SUN Liangbin, et al. Comparisons of salt resistances during germination stage among 27 cotton varieties (Line) grown in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 72-79.
[45]	Dai J L, Duan L S, Dong H Z. Improved nutrient uptake enhance cotton growth and salinity tolerance in saline media[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2014, 37(8): 1269-1286. DOI URL
[46]	孙娜, 王劲, 左开井. 陆地棉GhbHLH4基因的克隆与功能分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(3): 29-35.
	SUN Na, WANG Jin, ZUO Kaijing. Cloning and functional analysis of GhbHLH4 gene from upland cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 16(3): 29-35. DOI
[47]	Niñerola V B, Navarro-Pedreño J, Lucas I G, et al. Geostatistical assessment of soil salinity and cropping systems used as soil phytoremediation strategy[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 174(S1): 53-58. DOI URL
[48]	郑琦, 王海江, 吕新, 等. 新疆棉田土壤质量综合评价方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(4): 1291-1301. DOI
	ZHENG Qi, WANG Haijiang, LYU Xin, et al. Comprehensive method for evaluating soil quality in cotton fields in Xinjiang,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(4): 1291-1301. DOI
[49]	Ma H X, Meng C M, Zhang K X, et al. Study on physiological mechanism of using cottonseed meal to improve saline-alkali tolerance of cotton[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2021, 40(1): 126-136. DOI
[50]	汪保华, 王亚峰, 王长彪, 等. 中棉所35及中棉所12盐胁迫下的丙二醛含量变化及其SSR指纹图谱构建[J]. 中国棉花, 2011, 38(11): 20-23.
	WANG Baohua, WANG Yafeng, WANG Changbiao, et al. Effect of salt stress on malondialdehyde content variation and SSR fingerprint construction for CCRI 35 and CCRI 12[J]. China Cotton, 2011, 38(11): 20-23.
[51]	刘雅辉, 王秀萍, 鲁雪林, 等. 棉花耐盐相关序列扩增多态性(SRAP)分子标记筛选[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2015, 31(3): 484-488.
	LIU Yahui, WANG Xiuping, LU Xuelin, et al. Selection of sequence-related amplified polymorphism molecular marker associated withs salt tolerance of cotton[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 31(3): 484-488.

新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价

Evaluation of saline/alkali tolerance of new transgenic High-Yield cotton at germination and seedling stages

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 51

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[2]	魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021.
[3]	王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 曲可佳, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.
[4]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[5]	陈艳, 黄璐瑶, 邓昌蓉, 张彦君, 侯全刚, 邵登魁. 冷害对多茸毛型线辣椒幼苗生理水平的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1492-1498.
[6]	张燕红, 侯天钰, 巴音花, 赵彩月, 吕玉平, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 赵志强, 李冬, 杜孝敬, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 水稻重组自交系群体芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1041-1049.
[7]	哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126.
[8]	李家辉, 赵晓钰, 李海英, 张俐华, 张杰, 魏彦, 周军, 赵全庄, 李宗福. 也迷离鸡生长发育规律及体重体尺的相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1281-1291.
[9]	彭增莹, 张巨松, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 贺宏伟, 刘群, 郭仁松. 氮肥与缩节胺对机采棉生长发育及氮素分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 781-789.
[10]	陈亮亮, 张梦, 郭立平, 戚廷香, 张学贤, 唐会妮, 王海林, 乔秀琴, 吴建勇, 邢朝柱. 陆地棉杂交组合F₁、F₂苗期优势表现及亲本配合力分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 261-271.
[11]	周小云, 张军高, 周佳玉, 李进, 秦冰霜, 梁晶, 龚静云, 雷斌. 三种植物提取物对棉花种子发芽及幼苗生长影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2902-2910.
[12]	单莹, 李越, 徐敏, 刘艳珍, 李冉, 陈捷胤, 王子胜, 朱鹤. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下辽棉系列品种种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2653-2660.
[13]	孙明辉, 阿依努尔·卡依木, 翟梦华, 代健敏, 张巨松. 雹灾重播条件下不同棉花品种生长发育、产量及品质的差异比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2667-2673.
[14]	吕亮雨, 樊光辉, 付全, 苏彩风, 李发毅. 生物有机肥对枸杞生长及土壤性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2779-2789.
[15]	李欣欣, 赵强, 王为, 马春梅, 阿里木·阿木力, 占东霞, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 李广维, 田阳青. 0.1%噻苯隆复配不同外源物质对化学打顶棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2371-2379.