新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 781-789.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.001
彭增莹1(), 张巨松1(), 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木1, 贺宏伟1, 刘群1, 郭仁松2
收稿日期:
2022-09-04
出版日期:
2023-04-20
发布日期:
2023-05-06
通信作者:
张巨松(1963-),男,江苏人,博士,教授,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为棉花高产栽培与生理,(E-mail)作者简介:
彭增莹(1997-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花高产栽培,(E-mail)1826597157@qq.com
基金资助:
PENG Zengying1(), ZHANG Jusong1(), Kadiliya Abudukelimu1, HE Hongwei1, LIU Qun1, GUO Rensong2
Received:
2022-09-04
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Jusong(1963-), male, Professor, Master, Research area: high yield cultivation and physiology of cotton, (E-mail)Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究新疆机采棉田合理的施肥化控配套技术。【方法】采用双因素裂区试验设计,以新陆中88号为材料,设置3个纯氮水平(160、320、480 kg/hm2)及3个缩节胺剂量(189、280.5、372 g/hm2),分析氮肥与缩节胺对机采棉农艺性状、干物质积累与分配、氮素吸收及产量的影响。【结果】随施氮量增多,棉花生育时期滞后,喷施缩节胺可以提前棉花生育时期;随施氮量增多,棉花株高、倒四叶宽、茎粗、株高日增量、干物质总量增加,喷施缩节胺可以降低株高日增量、倒四叶宽及果枝数,增加生殖器官干物质占比。各施氮量下的氮素积累总量差异显著,N2较N1提高66.4%、较N3提高12.3%;氮肥与缩节胺对籽棉产量存在极显著的互作效应,N2水平下籽棉产量较N1提高21.6%,较N3提高14.8%,N2H2处理较N2H1、N2H3单株结铃数提高5.6%、3.6%,单铃重提高5.6%、11.8%。【结论】N2H2处理生殖器官干物质占比最合理,且蕾花铃氮素吸收量占比高,籽棉产量最高,为新疆南疆最适氮肥与缩节胺组合。
中图分类号:
彭增莹, 张巨松, 卡地力亚·阿不都克力木, 贺宏伟, 刘群, 郭仁松. 氮肥与缩节胺对机采棉生长发育及氮素分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 781-789.
PENG Zengying, ZHANG Jusong, Kadiliya Abudukelimu, HE Hongwei, LIU Qun, GUO Rensong. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and DPC on the growth and nitrogen distribution of machine-picked cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 781-789.
处理 Treatment | 基肥 Base fertilizer | 时间 Time(D/M) | 总量 Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/6 | 1/7 | 10/7 | 20/7 | 27/7 | 6/8 | 16/8 | 23/8 | |||
N1 | 32 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 160 |
N2 | 64 | 16 | 32 | 48 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 320 |
N3 | 96 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 48 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 480 |
表1 施氮量及时间
Tab.1 Nitrogen application amount and time(kg/hm2)
处理 Treatment | 基肥 Base fertilizer | 时间 Time(D/M) | 总量 Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/6 | 1/7 | 10/7 | 20/7 | 27/7 | 6/8 | 16/8 | 23/8 | |||
N1 | 32 | 8 | 16 | 24 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 160 |
N2 | 64 | 16 | 32 | 48 | 64 | 32 | 32 | 16 | 16 | 320 |
N3 | 96 | 24 | 48 | 72 | 96 | 48 | 48 | 24 | 24 | 480 |
处理 Treatment | 喷施时间 Spray time | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
现蕾 Appearing bud period | 盛蕾 Full bud period | 初花 Preliminary flower period | 打顶后7 d 7 th day after topping | 总量(DPC) Total | |
H1 | 12 | 12 | 45 | 120 | 189 |
H2 | 12 | 28.5 | 45 | 195 | 280.5 |
H3 | 12 | 45 | 45 | 270 | 372 |
表2 缩节胺用量
Tab.2 DPC dosage(g/hm2)
处理 Treatment | 喷施时间 Spray time | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
现蕾 Appearing bud period | 盛蕾 Full bud period | 初花 Preliminary flower period | 打顶后7 d 7 th day after topping | 总量(DPC) Total | |
H1 | 12 | 12 | 45 | 120 | 189 |
H2 | 12 | 28.5 | 45 | 195 | 280.5 |
H3 | 12 | 45 | 45 | 270 | 372 |
处理 Treatment | 出苗 Seedling (D/M) | 现蕾 Appearing bud period (D/M) | 开花 Prelim flower period (D/M) | 盛花 Full flower period (D/M) | 盛铃 Before full boll (D/M) | 吐絮 Opening boll period (D/M) | 苗期 Seedling- Appearing bud period (d) | 蕾期 Appearing bud period- Prelim flower period (d) | 花铃期 Prelim flower period- Appearing bud period (d) | 生育期 Reproductive period (d) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 22/4 | 4/6 | 29/6 | 13/7 | 25/7 | 4/9 | 43 | 25 | 67 | 135 | |
N1 | H2 | 22/4 | 1/6 | 29/6 | 12/7 | 26/7 | 5/9 | 40 | 28 | 68 | 136 |
H3 | 22/4 | 2/6 | 27/6 | 10/7 | 24/7 | 3/9 | 41 | 25 | 68 | 134 | |
H1 | 22/4 | 3/6 | 29/6 | 12/7 | 27/7 | 7/9 | 42 | 26 | 70 | 138 | |
N2 | H2 | 22/4 | 3/6 | 28/6 | 13/7 | 26/7 | 6/9 | 42 | 25 | 70 | 137 |
H3 | 22/4 | 1/6 | 28/6 | 12/7 | 25/7 | 4/9 | 40 | 27 | 68 | 135 | |
H1 | 22/4 | 2/6 | 29/6 | 14/7 | 27/7 | 10/9 | 41 | 27 | 73 | 141 | |
N3 | H2 | 22/4 | 1/6 | 29/6 | 15/7 | 26/7 | 10/9 | 40 | 28 | 73 | 141 |
H3 | 22/4 | 2/6 | 29/6 | 12/7 | 27/7 | 8/9 | 41 | 27 | 71 | 139 |
表3 不同处理棉花生育时期比较
Tab.3 Comparison of different treatments for reproductive period cotton
处理 Treatment | 出苗 Seedling (D/M) | 现蕾 Appearing bud period (D/M) | 开花 Prelim flower period (D/M) | 盛花 Full flower period (D/M) | 盛铃 Before full boll (D/M) | 吐絮 Opening boll period (D/M) | 苗期 Seedling- Appearing bud period (d) | 蕾期 Appearing bud period- Prelim flower period (d) | 花铃期 Prelim flower period- Appearing bud period (d) | 生育期 Reproductive period (d) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 22/4 | 4/6 | 29/6 | 13/7 | 25/7 | 4/9 | 43 | 25 | 67 | 135 | |
N1 | H2 | 22/4 | 1/6 | 29/6 | 12/7 | 26/7 | 5/9 | 40 | 28 | 68 | 136 |
H3 | 22/4 | 2/6 | 27/6 | 10/7 | 24/7 | 3/9 | 41 | 25 | 68 | 134 | |
H1 | 22/4 | 3/6 | 29/6 | 12/7 | 27/7 | 7/9 | 42 | 26 | 70 | 138 | |
N2 | H2 | 22/4 | 3/6 | 28/6 | 13/7 | 26/7 | 6/9 | 42 | 25 | 70 | 137 |
H3 | 22/4 | 1/6 | 28/6 | 12/7 | 25/7 | 4/9 | 40 | 27 | 68 | 135 | |
H1 | 22/4 | 2/6 | 29/6 | 14/7 | 27/7 | 10/9 | 41 | 27 | 73 | 141 | |
N3 | H2 | 22/4 | 1/6 | 29/6 | 15/7 | 26/7 | 10/9 | 40 | 28 | 73 | 141 |
H3 | 22/4 | 2/6 | 29/6 | 12/7 | 27/7 | 8/9 | 41 | 27 | 71 | 139 |
处理 Treatment | 时间/速度 Time/Speed (d/片) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗-3叶 Emerge em- ergence of seedings -3-leaf stage | 3叶-现蕾 3-leaf stage -Squaring | 现蕾-开花 Squaring -Flower | 开花-盛花 Flower- Blooming flowers | ||
H1 | 8.1a | 4.4a | 6.0b | 5.5b | |
N1 | H2 | 7.4ab | 3.8ab | 6.0b | 7.8ab |
H3 | 7.4ab | 3.8ab | 7.6a | 4.7bc | |
H1 | 8.3a | 4.5a | 5.3bc | 5.8b | |
N2 | H2 | 7.1ab | 4.3a | 5.4bc | 8.2a |
H3 | 7.6ab | 3.9ab | 7.2a | 4.6bc | |
H1 | 6.9b | 3.6b | 5.5bc | 8.9a | |
N3 | H2 | 6.8b | 3.6b | 6.1b | 4.4bc |
H3 | 7.1ab | 3.5b | 6.9ab | 8.7a |
表4 不同处理棉花出叶速度比较
Tab.4 Comparison of cotton leaf outlet speeds for different treatments
处理 Treatment | 时间/速度 Time/Speed (d/片) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗-3叶 Emerge em- ergence of seedings -3-leaf stage | 3叶-现蕾 3-leaf stage -Squaring | 现蕾-开花 Squaring -Flower | 开花-盛花 Flower- Blooming flowers | ||
H1 | 8.1a | 4.4a | 6.0b | 5.5b | |
N1 | H2 | 7.4ab | 3.8ab | 6.0b | 7.8ab |
H3 | 7.4ab | 3.8ab | 7.6a | 4.7bc | |
H1 | 8.3a | 4.5a | 5.3bc | 5.8b | |
N2 | H2 | 7.1ab | 4.3a | 5.4bc | 8.2a |
H3 | 7.6ab | 3.9ab | 7.2a | 4.6bc | |
H1 | 6.9b | 3.6b | 5.5bc | 8.9a | |
N3 | H2 | 6.8b | 3.6b | 6.1b | 4.4bc |
H3 | 7.1ab | 3.5b | 6.9ab | 8.7a |
处理 Treatment | 株高 Height (cm) | 倒四叶宽 Inverted four leaves wide (cm) | 始果节高 First fruit section height (cm) | 果枝数 Number of fruit branches (个) | 茎粗 Stem thick (mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 80.5bcd | 11.7d | 20.7a | 11.4abc | 8.7bcd | |
N1 | H2 | 83.9bc | 11.7d | 21.3a | 10.6bc | 8.4cd |
H3 | 69.8e | 12.5c | 22.0a | 10.0c | 8.0d | |
H1 | 85.4b | 13.4ab | 22.2a | 11.8ab | 9.4abc | |
N2 | H2 | 83.4bc | 12.8bc | 22.7a | 10.8bc | 9.3abc |
H3 | 79.2cd | 12.5c | 20.0a | 12.4a | 8.8bcd | |
H1 | 94.1a | 13.3ab | 21.3a | 11.6ab | 9.8a | |
N3 | H2 | 83.0bc | 13.7a | 21.0a | 11.6ab | 9.1abc |
H3 | 77.5d | 12.9abc | 23.0a | 10.8bc | 9.5ab | |
N | ** | ** | NS | * | ** | |
H | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
N×H | * | ** | NS | NS | NS |
表5 盛铃后期各处理棉花主要农艺性状比较
Tab.5 Comparison of cotton main agronomic characters of different treatments in late boll stage
处理 Treatment | 株高 Height (cm) | 倒四叶宽 Inverted four leaves wide (cm) | 始果节高 First fruit section height (cm) | 果枝数 Number of fruit branches (个) | 茎粗 Stem thick (mm) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 80.5bcd | 11.7d | 20.7a | 11.4abc | 8.7bcd | |
N1 | H2 | 83.9bc | 11.7d | 21.3a | 10.6bc | 8.4cd |
H3 | 69.8e | 12.5c | 22.0a | 10.0c | 8.0d | |
H1 | 85.4b | 13.4ab | 22.2a | 11.8ab | 9.4abc | |
N2 | H2 | 83.4bc | 12.8bc | 22.7a | 10.8bc | 9.3abc |
H3 | 79.2cd | 12.5c | 20.0a | 12.4a | 8.8bcd | |
H1 | 94.1a | 13.3ab | 21.3a | 11.6ab | 9.8a | |
N3 | H2 | 83.0bc | 13.7a | 21.0a | 11.6ab | 9.1abc |
H3 | 77.5d | 12.9abc | 23.0a | 10.8bc | 9.5ab | |
N | ** | ** | NS | * | ** | |
H | ** | NS | NS | NS | NS | |
N×H | * | ** | NS | NS | NS |
处理 Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 蕾花铃 Bud flower bell | 总积累量 Total (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N素吸收量 N absorption (kg/hm2) | 占比 Proportion (100%) | N素吸收量 N absorption (kg/hm2) | 占比 Proportion (100%) | N素吸收量 N absorption (kg/hm2) | 占比 Proportion (100%) | |||
H1 | 15.35d | 0.17 | 25.49c | 0.27 | 52.88cd | 0.56 | 93.72c | |
N1 | H2 | 14.92d | 0.18 | 13.78e | 0.16 | 55.22cd | 0.66 | 83.92c |
H3 | 27.67b | 0.27 | 14.73e | 0.14 | 60.53c | 0.59 | 102.93c | |
H1 | 28.17b | 0.14 | 33.08a | 0.17 | 134.36a | 0.69 | 195.61a | |
N2 | H2 | 22.64c | 0.12 | 30.89ab | 0.17 | 133.71a | 0.71 | 187.24a |
H3 | 22.68c | 0.27 | 27.34c | 0.33 | 33.99d | 0.40 | 84.01c | |
H1 | 34.33a | 0.32 | 30.14b | 0.29 | 41.76cd | 0.39 | 106.23bc | |
N3 | H2 | 20.95c | 0.11 | 19.22d | 0.11 | 142.07a | 0.78 | 182.24a |
H3 | 17.31d | 0.13 | 13.72e | 0.11 | 96.18b | 0.76 | 127.21b |
表6 地上部不同器官氮素吸收量及占比
Tab.6 Nitrogen uptake and proportion of different organs in aboveground parts
处理 Treatment | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 蕾花铃 Bud flower bell | 总积累量 Total (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N素吸收量 N absorption (kg/hm2) | 占比 Proportion (100%) | N素吸收量 N absorption (kg/hm2) | 占比 Proportion (100%) | N素吸收量 N absorption (kg/hm2) | 占比 Proportion (100%) | |||
H1 | 15.35d | 0.17 | 25.49c | 0.27 | 52.88cd | 0.56 | 93.72c | |
N1 | H2 | 14.92d | 0.18 | 13.78e | 0.16 | 55.22cd | 0.66 | 83.92c |
H3 | 27.67b | 0.27 | 14.73e | 0.14 | 60.53c | 0.59 | 102.93c | |
H1 | 28.17b | 0.14 | 33.08a | 0.17 | 134.36a | 0.69 | 195.61a | |
N2 | H2 | 22.64c | 0.12 | 30.89ab | 0.17 | 133.71a | 0.71 | 187.24a |
H3 | 22.68c | 0.27 | 27.34c | 0.33 | 33.99d | 0.40 | 84.01c | |
H1 | 34.33a | 0.32 | 30.14b | 0.29 | 41.76cd | 0.39 | 106.23bc | |
N3 | H2 | 20.95c | 0.11 | 19.22d | 0.11 | 142.07a | 0.78 | 182.24a |
H3 | 17.31d | 0.13 | 13.72e | 0.11 | 96.18b | 0.76 | 127.21b |
处理 Treatment | 收获株数 Harvest number (104/hm2) | 单株结铃数 Number of bolls per plant (个) | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 20.5a | 4.7cd | 5.5a | 0.46a | 5 229.1d | ||||
N1 | H2 | 20.7a | 4.8c | 5.1a | 0.46a | 5 161.5de | |||
H3 | 20.6a | 4.8c | 5.3a | 0.47a | 5 211.6d | ||||
H1 | 21.2a | 5.4b | 5.4a | 0.46a | 6 181.5b | ||||
N2 | H2 | 21.3a | 5.7a | 5.7a | 0.46a | 6 875.1a | |||
H3 | 21.2a | 5.5ab | 5.1a | 0.46a | 5 912.3bc | ||||
H1 | 20.6a | 4.5d | 5.1a | 0.46a | 4 671.4e | ||||
N3 | H2 | 20.5a | 5.6ab | 5.5a | 0.46a | 6 282.5b | |||
H3 | 20.5a | 4.8c | 5.7a | 0.46a | 5 575.8cd | ||||
N | NS | * | NS | NS | ** | ||||
H | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | ||||
N×H | NS | ** | * | NS | ** |
表7 各处理产量及产量构成因素
Tab.7 Each treatment yield and yield components
处理 Treatment | 收获株数 Harvest number (104/hm2) | 单株结铃数 Number of bolls per plant (个) | 单铃重 Single bell weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1 | 20.5a | 4.7cd | 5.5a | 0.46a | 5 229.1d | ||||
N1 | H2 | 20.7a | 4.8c | 5.1a | 0.46a | 5 161.5de | |||
H3 | 20.6a | 4.8c | 5.3a | 0.47a | 5 211.6d | ||||
H1 | 21.2a | 5.4b | 5.4a | 0.46a | 6 181.5b | ||||
N2 | H2 | 21.3a | 5.7a | 5.7a | 0.46a | 6 875.1a | |||
H3 | 21.2a | 5.5ab | 5.1a | 0.46a | 5 912.3bc | ||||
H1 | 20.6a | 4.5d | 5.1a | 0.46a | 4 671.4e | ||||
N3 | H2 | 20.5a | 5.6ab | 5.5a | 0.46a | 6 282.5b | |||
H3 | 20.5a | 4.8c | 5.7a | 0.46a | 5 575.8cd | ||||
N | NS | * | NS | NS | ** | ||||
H | NS | NS | NS | NS | ** | ||||
N×H | NS | ** | * | NS | ** |
[1] |
成厚亮, 张富仓, 李萌, 等. 不同生育期土壤基质势调控对棉花生长和土壤水盐分布的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(1): 211-221.
DOI |
CHENG Houliang, ZHANG Fucang, LI Meng, et al. Effects of soil matrix potential regulation at various growth states on cotton growth and soil water and salt distribution[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(1): 211-221.
DOI |
|
[2] | Tung Shahbaz Atta. 缩节胺对晚播高密棉花形态特征、生理特性的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2018. |
Tung Shahbaz Atta. Foliar Applied Mepiquat Chloride Induced Morpho-physiological Changes in Late-planted Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) at High Density[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[3] | 王克秀, 唐铭霞, 胡建军, 等. 氮素水平对雾培马铃薯植株生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,(5): 38-45. |
WANG Kexiu, TANG Mingxia, HU Jianjun, et al. Effect of nitrogen levels on growth and yield of potato in an aeroponic system[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019,(5): 38-45. | |
[4] | 石洪亮, 张巨松, 严青青, 等. 非充分滴灌下施氮量对棉花生长特性、产量及水氮利用率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(4): 129-136. |
SHI Hongliang, ZHANG Jusong, YAN Qingqing, et al. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer levels on growth,yield,water and nitrogen use efficiency of cotton under non-sufficient drip irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(4): 129-136. | |
[5] | 胡明芳, 田长彦, 马英杰, 等. 氮素营养对棉铃形成与脱落的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005,(1): 95-98. |
HU Mingfang, TIAN Changyan, MA Yingjie, et al. Effects of nitrogen on the formation and shedding of cotton bolls[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2005,(1): 95-98. | |
[6] | 娄善伟, 张巨松, 罗新宁, 等. 施氮水平对棉花农艺性状、倒四叶光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2009, 32(1): 39-42. |
LOU Shanwei, ZHANG Jusong, LUO Xinning, et al. Influence of nitrogenous fertilizer level on agronomic characters fourth leaf from top photosynthetic characteristics and yield of cotton[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2009, 32(1): 39-42. | |
[7] | 潘胜屏. 缩节胺可控制无效生长[J]. 农家参谋, 2004,(5): 11. |
PAN Shengping. DPC controls ineffective growth[J]. The Farmers Consultant, 2004,(5): 11. | |
[8] |
Gencsoylu I. Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Agronomic Characteristics, Lint Quality, Pests, and Predators in Cotton[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2009, 28(2): 147-153.
DOI URL |
[9] | 张超, 于起庆, 马晓丽, 等. 缩节胺对棉花生长及产量影响的应用研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(9): 11-13. |
ZHANG Chao, YU Qiqing, MA Xiaoli, et al. Advances in the Application of Mepiquat Chloride to the Growth and Yield of Cotton[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(9): 11-13. | |
[10] | 杨长琴, 张国伟, 刘瑞显, 等. 种植密度和缩节胺调控对麦后直播棉产量和冠层特征的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(4): 331-338. |
YANG Changqin, ZHANG Guowei, LIU Ruixian, et al. Effects of planting density and growth regulator mepiquat chloride on yields and canopy architecture of cotton sown after harvesting barley[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(4): 331-338. | |
[11] | 韩焕勇, 王方永, 陈兵, 等. 氮肥对棉花应用增效缩节胺封顶效果的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(2): 12-20. |
HAN Huanyong, WANG Fangyong, CHEN Bing, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on plant growth and yield formation of cotton applied with fortified DPC[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(2): 12-20. | |
[12] | 张特, 王蜜蜂, 赵强. 滴施缩节胺与氮肥对棉花生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021: 1-19. |
ZHANG Te, WANG Mifeng, ZHAO Qiang. Effects of DPC and nitrogen fertilizer through drip irrigation on growth and yield in cotton[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021: 1-19. | |
[13] | 辛明华, 王占彪, 韩迎春, 等. 新疆机采棉发展回顾、现状分析及措施建议[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 11-20. |
XIN Minghua, WANG Zhanbiao, HAN Yingchun, et al. Review,Status and Measures of Xinjiang Machine-picked Cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 11-20. | |
[14] | 李志坤. 过量施用氮肥及缩节胺对棉花产量及纤维品质和种子质量的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2018. |
LI Zhikun. Effects of excess nitrogen fertilizer and DPC onyield and quality of fibers and seeds in cotton[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[15] | 李勇, 王峰, 孙景生, 等. 内蒙古西部旱区机采棉膜下滴灌水氮耦合效应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(3): 845-854. |
LI Yong, WANG Feng, SUN Jingsheng, et al. Coupling effect of water and nitrogen on mechanically harvested cotton with drip irrigation under plastic film in arid area of western Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(3): 845-854.
DOI |
|
[16] | 石洪亮, 张巨松, 严青青, 等. 施氮量对南疆机采棉生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(3): 397-404. |
SHI Honglian, ZHANG Jusong, YAN Qingqing, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rates on growth characteristics and yield of machine-picking cotton in south Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 397-404. | |
[17] | 李春艳, 张巨松, 向雁玲, 等. 密度与氮肥对机采棉生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2018, 41(4): 633-639. |
LI Chunyan, ZHANG Jusong, XIANG Yanling, et al. Effects of density and nitrogen fertilizer on growth characteristics and yield of cotton harvested by machine[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2018, 41(4): 633-639. | |
[18] | 霍飞超. 南疆1膜3行模式密度与缩节胺对棉花生长及产量的影响[D]. 阿拉尔: 塔里木大学, 2020. |
HUO Feichao. Effects of density and DPC on cotton growth and yield under the planting mode of one film with three rows in southern Xinjiang[D]. Aral: Tarim University, 2020. | |
[19] |
刘丽英, 戴茂华, 吴振良. 缩节胺对黄河流域机采棉农艺性状、产量和品质的影响及化控技术研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(33): 38-42.
DOI |
LIU Liying, DAI Maohua, WU Zhenliang. Effects of DPC on agronomic characters, yield, fiber quality of machine picked cotton in the yellow river valley and chemical treatment technical research[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(33): 38-42.
DOI |
|
[20] | 何钟佩, 闵祥佳, 李丕明, 等. 植物生长延缓剂DPC对棉铃内源激素水平和棉铃发育影响的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1990,(3): 252-258. |
HE Zhongping, MIN Xiangjia, LI Piming, et al. Study on effects of DPC on endogenous hormone levels and the development of cotton bolls[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1990,(3): 252-258. | |
[21] |
赵文超, 杜明伟, 黎芳, 等. 应用缩节安(DPC)调控棉花株型的定位定量效应研究[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 1059-1069.
DOI |
ZHAO Wenchao, DU Mingwei, LI Fang, et al. Location- and quantity-based effects of mepiquat chloride application on cotton plant-type[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(7): 1059-1069.
DOI |
|
[22] | 刘铨义, 周晶, 王文博, 等. 缩节胺对棉花品种生理生育特性影响研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(7): 1280-1284. |
LIU Quanyi, ZHOU Jing, WANG Wenbo, et al. Study the effect of DPC treatment on physiological and fertility characteristics of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(7): 1280-1284. | |
[23] | 李伶俐, 房卫平, 谢德意, 等. 施氮量对杂交棉干物质积累、分配和氮磷钾吸收、分配与利用的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(4): 347-353. |
LI Lingli, FANG Weiping, XIE Deyi, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on dry matter accumulation and N, P, K uptake and distribution in different organs and utilization of hybrid cotton under high-yield cultivated condition[J]. Cotton Science, 2010, 22(4): 347-353. | |
[24] | 王士红. 增密减氮对棉花产量品质的影响及氮高效生理基础研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2019. |
WANG Shihong. Effects of increasing plant density and decreasing nitrogen rate on yield and quality of cotton, and physiological mechanisms of nitrogen efficient utilization[D]. Tai'an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[25] | 徐景丽. 氮素和缩节胺对小麦后直播棉产量及农艺性状的调节[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2021. |
XU Jingli. Regulation of both nitrogen and DPC on the yield and agronomic triats for direct seeding cotton after wheat harvest[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2021. | |
[26] | 刘生荣, 李葆来, 贾涛, 等. 棉花限水灌溉与氮肥化学控制的产量效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005,(3): 76-78. |
LIU Shengron, LI Baolai, JIA Tao, et al. Study on limited irrigation and N fertilizer and DPC regulation for yield effect of cotton[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005,(3): 76-78. | |
[27] | 罗宏海, 赵瑞海, 韩春丽, 等. 缩节胺(DPC)对不同密度下棉花冠层结构特征与产量性状的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(4): 334-340. |
LUO Honghai, ZHAO Ruihai, HAN Chunli, et al. Effects of growth regulators(DPC) on canopy architecture and yield characteristics of cotton under different planting densities[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(4): 334-340. |
[1] | 刘海军, 张昊, 王一帆, 陈茂光, 吴凤全, 林涛, 汤秋香. 不同覆盖材料和灌溉量对机采棉产量形成及有效积温生产效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | 杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[3] | 陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[4] | 宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
[5] | 李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[6] | 魏迎凤, 张全成, 查慧, 王小丽, 王俊刚. 二甲戊灵对龙葵苗期主要生长发育和生理指标的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 2013-2021. |
[7] | 段松江, 彭增莹, 申莹莹, 木丽迪尔·拜波拉提, 吴一凡, 崔建平, 张巨松. 不同海岛棉品种产量及纤维品质对氮肥的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1569-1579. |
[8] | 张永强, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 雷钧杰, 刘昌文. 氮肥增效剂与氮肥减量配施对冬小麦叶片生理及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325. |
[9] | 江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397. |
[10] | 刘兴宇, 袁建钰, 李广, 张娟, 徐万恒, 张霞霞. 陇中黄土高原春小麦品种和优化施肥[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1398-1405. |
[11] | 申莹莹, 张巨松, 彭增莹, 段松江, 李宗润, 吴一帆. 缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉冠层结构、光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1110-1117. |
[12] | 李家辉, 赵晓钰, 李海英, 张俐华, 张杰, 魏彦, 周军, 赵全庄, 李宗福. 也迷离鸡生长发育规律及体重体尺的相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1281-1291. |
[13] | 申莹莹, 张巨松, 彭增莹, 李宗润, 段松江, 吴一帆, 郭仁松. 缩节胺复配打顶剂对机采棉株型塑造和棉铃分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 790-797. |
[14] | 代健敏, 张巨松, 徐新龙, 李始鑫, 翟梦华, 孙明辉. 氮肥运筹对雹后重播受旱棉花生长特性及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 798-809. |
[15] | 张宸, 梁悦, 殷昊, 张应榕, 陈波浪. 氮肥形态和品种对棉花根系形态与氮素积累的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 823-831. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||