

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (6): 1408-1420.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.06.013
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Ruyue1,2(
), LUO Shasha1,2, ZHEN Ziyi1,2, XU Yeyong3, HU Haifang3(
), WANG Junwu4(
)
Received:2024-10-29
Online:2025-06-20
Published:2025-07-29
Correspondence author:
HU Haifang, WANG Junwu
Supported by:
王如月1,2(
), 罗莎莎1,2, 甄紫怡1,2, 徐业勇3, 虎海防3(
), 王俊武4(
)
通讯作者:
虎海防,王俊武
作者简介:王如月(1996-),女,硕士研究生,研究方向为森林培育,(E-mail)1547093665@qq.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
WANG Ruyue, LUO Shasha, ZHEN Ziyi, XU Yeyong, HU Haifang, WANG Junwu. Study on methods for judging different maturity of prunus domestica × armeniaca ‘Konglongdan’ fruits[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1408-1420.
王如月, 罗莎莎, 甄紫怡, 徐业勇, 虎海防, 王俊武. 杏李‘恐龙蛋’果实不同成熟度的判定方法分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(6): 1408-1420.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.06.013
| 盛花期后天数 The day after the peak flowering period(d) | 果皮颜色 Pericarp color | 果肉颜色 Flesh color | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | a*/b* | L* | a* | b* | a*/b* | |
| 102 | 58.483±0.914a | 1.053±1.485h | 28.917±1.675a | 0.040±0.056g | 52.083±2.770a | 4.640±0.730g | 28.930±0.979a | 0.163±0.031j |
| 105 | 57.163±1.570ab | 1.497±2.379h | 23.257±3.377b | 0.087±0.134g | 49.723±0.899ab | 9.223±2.081fg | 20.013±0.782b | 0.460±0.096ij |
| 108 | 57.253±2.206ab | 2.017±0.315h | 22.660±1.092bc | 0.090±0.017g | 47.150±1.034bc | 11.907±4.139f | 19.433±1.180bc | 0.610±0.187hij |
| 111 | 54.247±1.288abc | 2.713±2.678gh | 22.240±1.747bc | 0.137±0.165g | 46.783±1.493bc | 19.070±0.991e | 17.413±1.306bcd | 1.100±0.121hij |
| 114 | 54.323±1.645abc | 4.683±1.052fgh | 21.653±1.608bcd | 0.223±0.059fg | 43.973±2.011c | 20.083±0.495e | 16.830±0.884cde | 1.197±0.090ghij |
| 117 | 54.313±2.798abc | 6.637±1.289efg | 19.070±0.476cde | 0.350±0.072fg | 42.783±0.143de | 20.843±3.032e | 16.457±0.486de | 1.270±0.208ghij |
| 120 | 51.570±1.634bcd | 7.123±3.871ef | 18.147±1.201def | 0.430±0.236fg | 42.703±0.857de | 22.330±3.038de | 15.667±0.751def | 1.430±0.219fghij |
| 123 | 50.037±0.648cde | 6.457±2.677efg | 18.307±0.917def | 0.377±0.170fg | 42.163±2.041def | 22.443±2.798de | 15.603±2.441def | 1.447±0.116fghij |
| 126 | 49.670±1.748cde | 7.697±1.274def | 17.537±0.816ef | 0.453±0.081efg | 39.160±2.310ef | 23.557±0.694cde | 15.237±0.578def | 1.547±0.049efghij |
| 129 | 49.597±3.131cde | 9.293±0.759cde | 17.233±3.580ef | 0.800±0.459defg | 41.563±3.083def | 22.423±2.697de | 13.423±1.341fgh | 1.693±0.348efghi |
| 132 | 49.220±1.903cde | 11.437±1.307bcd | 16.207±1.182efg | 0.783±0.168defg | 38.710±1.998fg | 23.413±2.125cde | 14.630±1.164efg | 1.603±0.127efghij |
| 135 | 46.907±3.621efg | 11.730±2.668bc | 15.457±3.016efg | 0.883±0.348defg | 41.243±2.238def | 25.763±1.053abcd | 13.280±1.533fgh | 1.953±0.236defgh |
| 138 | 44.170±8.75efg | 11.593±0.801bcd | 14.773±1.134fgh | 0.833±0.133defg | 35.300±1.381g | 25.580±2.06bcd | 12.020±0.475ghi | 2.130±0.185defg |
| 141 | 43.897±4.304def | 13.623±0.477ab | 12.910±1.474ghi | 1.203±0.081def | 31.083±1.209h | 25.850±4.004abcd | 11.947±0.800hi | 2.157±0.200defg |
| 144 | 42.367±1.739fgh | 14.513±1.489ab | 12.863±2.530ghi | 1.540±0.872bcd | 29.957±1.744hi | 25.707±3.394abcd | 12.233±1.292ghi | 2.110±0.275defg |
| 147 | 39.447±2.172gh | 14.007±0.874ab | 11.333±2.481hij | 1.437±0.532cde | 28.777±1.845hig | 27.950±1.274abc | 9.607±1.721ij | 2.967±0.455cde |
| 150 | 40.267±3.865gh | 14.040±0.576ab | 10.327±1.045ij | 1.500±0.246cd | 28.427±1.272hig | 27.837±1.337abc | 9.973±1.265ij | 2.810±0.217cdef |
| 153 | 38.293±2.824gh | 14.453±0.499ab | 10.180±0.602ij | 1.617±0.146bcd | 26.887±1.294ig | 27.500±1.329abc | 8.263±0.665jk | 3.340±0.260bcd |
| 156 | 40.093±0.986gh | 15.837±4.575a | 9.043±2.441ij | 2.427±0.509abc | 26.813±1.087ig | 30.137±1.848ab | 7.833±1.27jk | 3.947±0.926bc |
| 159 | 38.123±3.369gh | 16.733±1.371a | 8.133±1.161j | 3.033±1.426a | 27.930±2.056hig | 28.993±1.453ab | 6.570±0.636k | 4.450±0.567ab |
| 162 | 37.610±0.751h | 16.023±0.788a | 8.443±1.419j | 2.500±1.012ab | 25.557±2.485g | 30.323±1.875a | 6.433±2.760k | 5.497±2.890a |
Tab.1 Changes of different days after flowering on the color of fruit skin and flesh
| 盛花期后天数 The day after the peak flowering period(d) | 果皮颜色 Pericarp color | 果肉颜色 Flesh color | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | a*/b* | L* | a* | b* | a*/b* | |
| 102 | 58.483±0.914a | 1.053±1.485h | 28.917±1.675a | 0.040±0.056g | 52.083±2.770a | 4.640±0.730g | 28.930±0.979a | 0.163±0.031j |
| 105 | 57.163±1.570ab | 1.497±2.379h | 23.257±3.377b | 0.087±0.134g | 49.723±0.899ab | 9.223±2.081fg | 20.013±0.782b | 0.460±0.096ij |
| 108 | 57.253±2.206ab | 2.017±0.315h | 22.660±1.092bc | 0.090±0.017g | 47.150±1.034bc | 11.907±4.139f | 19.433±1.180bc | 0.610±0.187hij |
| 111 | 54.247±1.288abc | 2.713±2.678gh | 22.240±1.747bc | 0.137±0.165g | 46.783±1.493bc | 19.070±0.991e | 17.413±1.306bcd | 1.100±0.121hij |
| 114 | 54.323±1.645abc | 4.683±1.052fgh | 21.653±1.608bcd | 0.223±0.059fg | 43.973±2.011c | 20.083±0.495e | 16.830±0.884cde | 1.197±0.090ghij |
| 117 | 54.313±2.798abc | 6.637±1.289efg | 19.070±0.476cde | 0.350±0.072fg | 42.783±0.143de | 20.843±3.032e | 16.457±0.486de | 1.270±0.208ghij |
| 120 | 51.570±1.634bcd | 7.123±3.871ef | 18.147±1.201def | 0.430±0.236fg | 42.703±0.857de | 22.330±3.038de | 15.667±0.751def | 1.430±0.219fghij |
| 123 | 50.037±0.648cde | 6.457±2.677efg | 18.307±0.917def | 0.377±0.170fg | 42.163±2.041def | 22.443±2.798de | 15.603±2.441def | 1.447±0.116fghij |
| 126 | 49.670±1.748cde | 7.697±1.274def | 17.537±0.816ef | 0.453±0.081efg | 39.160±2.310ef | 23.557±0.694cde | 15.237±0.578def | 1.547±0.049efghij |
| 129 | 49.597±3.131cde | 9.293±0.759cde | 17.233±3.580ef | 0.800±0.459defg | 41.563±3.083def | 22.423±2.697de | 13.423±1.341fgh | 1.693±0.348efghi |
| 132 | 49.220±1.903cde | 11.437±1.307bcd | 16.207±1.182efg | 0.783±0.168defg | 38.710±1.998fg | 23.413±2.125cde | 14.630±1.164efg | 1.603±0.127efghij |
| 135 | 46.907±3.621efg | 11.730±2.668bc | 15.457±3.016efg | 0.883±0.348defg | 41.243±2.238def | 25.763±1.053abcd | 13.280±1.533fgh | 1.953±0.236defgh |
| 138 | 44.170±8.75efg | 11.593±0.801bcd | 14.773±1.134fgh | 0.833±0.133defg | 35.300±1.381g | 25.580±2.06bcd | 12.020±0.475ghi | 2.130±0.185defg |
| 141 | 43.897±4.304def | 13.623±0.477ab | 12.910±1.474ghi | 1.203±0.081def | 31.083±1.209h | 25.850±4.004abcd | 11.947±0.800hi | 2.157±0.200defg |
| 144 | 42.367±1.739fgh | 14.513±1.489ab | 12.863±2.530ghi | 1.540±0.872bcd | 29.957±1.744hi | 25.707±3.394abcd | 12.233±1.292ghi | 2.110±0.275defg |
| 147 | 39.447±2.172gh | 14.007±0.874ab | 11.333±2.481hij | 1.437±0.532cde | 28.777±1.845hig | 27.950±1.274abc | 9.607±1.721ij | 2.967±0.455cde |
| 150 | 40.267±3.865gh | 14.040±0.576ab | 10.327±1.045ij | 1.500±0.246cd | 28.427±1.272hig | 27.837±1.337abc | 9.973±1.265ij | 2.810±0.217cdef |
| 153 | 38.293±2.824gh | 14.453±0.499ab | 10.180±0.602ij | 1.617±0.146bcd | 26.887±1.294ig | 27.500±1.329abc | 8.263±0.665jk | 3.340±0.260bcd |
| 156 | 40.093±0.986gh | 15.837±4.575a | 9.043±2.441ij | 2.427±0.509abc | 26.813±1.087ig | 30.137±1.848ab | 7.833±1.27jk | 3.947±0.926bc |
| 159 | 38.123±3.369gh | 16.733±1.371a | 8.133±1.161j | 3.033±1.426a | 27.930±2.056hig | 28.993±1.453ab | 6.570±0.636k | 4.450±0.567ab |
| 162 | 37.610±0.751h | 16.023±0.788a | 8.443±1.419j | 2.500±1.012ab | 25.557±2.485g | 30.323±1.875a | 6.433±2.760k | 5.497±2.890a |
Fig.2 Contribution rates of fruit quality indicators in different dimensions Notes: The darker the color in the figure, the greater the contribution rate, while the lighter the color, the smaller the contribution rate
Fig.3 Contribution rate of fruit color index in different dimensions Notes: The darker the color in the figure, the greater the contribution rate, while the lighter the color, the smaller the contribution rate. PL represents the brightness value of the fruit peel L*, Pa represents the red green value of the fruit peel a*, Pb represents the yellow blue value of the fruit peel b*, Pa. b represents the color ratio of the fruit peel a*/b*, FL represents the flesh L*, and Fa represents the flesh a*
Fig.4 Selection results of fruit quality and chromaticity indicators Notes: The redder the line color, the greater the contribution during different ripening stages of the fruit, while the blue color indicates the minimum contribution during different ripening stages of the fruit
Fig.6 Sample distribution of fruits with different maturity levels based on Fisher linear discriminant analysis Notes: 6 represents six maturity, 7 represents seven maturity, 8 represents eight maturity, 9 represents nine maturity, and 10 represents ten maturity
| 成熟度 Maturity | 预测成员信息Predicting member information | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 六成熟 Six Maturity | 七成熟 SevenMaturity | 八成熟 Eight Maturity | 九成熟 Nine Maturity | 十成熟 Ten Maturity | 总计 Total | ||
| 回代检验 | 六成熟 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Backtesting | 七成熟 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 未分组个案 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 18 | |
| 六成熟 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 七成熟 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 未分组个案 | 11.1 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 22.2 | 11.1 | 100 | |
| 判别正确率 | 100.0% | ||||||
| 六成熟 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 七成熟 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 回代检验 | 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Backtesting | 六成熟 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 七成熟 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 100 | |
| 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 判别正确率 | 195.20% | ||||||
Tab.2 Classification results of fruits with different maturity levels based on Fisher linear discriminant analysis
| 成熟度 Maturity | 预测成员信息Predicting member information | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 六成熟 Six Maturity | 七成熟 SevenMaturity | 八成熟 Eight Maturity | 九成熟 Nine Maturity | 十成熟 Ten Maturity | 总计 Total | ||
| 回代检验 | 六成熟 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Backtesting | 七成熟 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | |
| 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 未分组个案 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 18 | |
| 六成熟 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 七成熟 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 未分组个案 | 11.1 | 27.8 | 27.8 | 22.2 | 11.1 | 100 | |
| 判别正确率 | 100.0% | ||||||
| 六成熟 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 七成熟 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 | |
| 回代检验 | 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Backtesting | 六成熟 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 |
| 七成熟 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 八成熟 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | |
| 九成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75 | 25 | 100 | |
| 十成熟 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 100 | |
| 判别正确率 | 195.20% | ||||||
Fig.7 PCA analysis at different maturity levels Notes: Single fruit weight represents single fruit weight, Skin hardness represents peel hardness, Peeling hardness represents peel hardness, Tittable acid represents titratable acid, Solid solids represents soluble solids, Solid acid ratio represents solid acid ratio, PL* is the abbreviation of peel L* Peel L*, Pa* is the abbreviation of peel a* Peel a*, Pb* is the abbreviation of peel b* Peel b*, Pa*/b* is the abbreviation of peel a/* b* Peel a/* b*, FL* is the abbreviation of flesh L* Fruit pulp L*, Fa* is Fruit pulp a*, Fb* stands for Fruit pulp b*, Fa*/b* stands for Fruit pulp L*
| 成熟度 Maturity | 盛花期 后天数 Days after flowering period (d) | 色度指标Color index | 品质指标Quality indicators | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果皮黄蓝值 Peel b* | 果皮 a*/ b* | 果肉亮度值 Flesh L* | 果肉红绿值 Flesh a* | 带皮硬度 Skin hardness (N) | 去皮硬度 Peeling hardness (N) | 固酸比 Solid acid ratio (%) | 单果重 Single fruit weight (g) | ||
| 六成熟 Six mature | <102 | >22.658 | <0.088 | >47.150 | <11.907 | >34.651 | >30.835 | <0.804 | <84.200 |
| 七成熟 seven mature | 111-126 | 17.537-22.658 | 0.088-0.454 | 39.162-47.150 | 11.907-23.533 | 28.452-34.651 | 17.491-30.835 | 0.804-1.323 | 84.200-104.557 |
| 八成熟 Eight mature | 129-144 | 12.862-17.537 | 0.454-1.538 | 29.954-39.162 | 23.533-25.706 | 23.717-28.452 | 12.668-17.491 | 1.323-1.921 | 105.557-132.200 |
| 九成熟 Nine mature | 147-156 | 9.042-12.862 | 1.538-2.426 | 29.954-26.812 | 25.706-30.138 | 19.081-23.717 | 9.017-12.668 | 1.921-3.818 | 132.200-106.290 |
| 十成熟 Ten mature | >159 | <9.042 | >2.426 | <26.812 | >30.138 | <19.081 | <9.017 | >3.818 | <106.290 |
Tab.3 Quantitative Index Range for Different Maturity Criteria of Dinosaur Eggs
| 成熟度 Maturity | 盛花期 后天数 Days after flowering period (d) | 色度指标Color index | 品质指标Quality indicators | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 果皮黄蓝值 Peel b* | 果皮 a*/ b* | 果肉亮度值 Flesh L* | 果肉红绿值 Flesh a* | 带皮硬度 Skin hardness (N) | 去皮硬度 Peeling hardness (N) | 固酸比 Solid acid ratio (%) | 单果重 Single fruit weight (g) | ||
| 六成熟 Six mature | <102 | >22.658 | <0.088 | >47.150 | <11.907 | >34.651 | >30.835 | <0.804 | <84.200 |
| 七成熟 seven mature | 111-126 | 17.537-22.658 | 0.088-0.454 | 39.162-47.150 | 11.907-23.533 | 28.452-34.651 | 17.491-30.835 | 0.804-1.323 | 84.200-104.557 |
| 八成熟 Eight mature | 129-144 | 12.862-17.537 | 0.454-1.538 | 29.954-39.162 | 23.533-25.706 | 23.717-28.452 | 12.668-17.491 | 1.323-1.921 | 105.557-132.200 |
| 九成熟 Nine mature | 147-156 | 9.042-12.862 | 1.538-2.426 | 29.954-26.812 | 25.706-30.138 | 19.081-23.717 | 9.017-12.668 | 1.921-3.818 | 132.200-106.290 |
| 十成熟 Ten mature | >159 | <9.042 | >2.426 | <26.812 | >30.138 | <19.081 | <9.017 | >3.818 | <106.290 |
| [1] | 丁向阳, 孙晓辉. 美国杏李种间杂交新品种及引种栽培前景[J]. 林业科技开发, 2004,(5): 13-16. |
| DING Xiangyang, SUN Xiaohui. Prospects on introduction and cultivation of new varieties from the hybrid between American apricot and plum[J]. China Forestry Science and Technology, 2004,(5): 13-16. | |
| [2] | 杨飞, 韦茜, 刘朝英, 等. 美国杏李种植管理技术[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2011, 27(3): 155-156. |
| YANG Fei, WEI Qian, LIU Zhaoying, et al. Planting management techniques of apricot and plum in the United States[J]. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2011, 27(3): 155-156. | |
| [3] | 李芳东. 农业成果转化资金项目介绍杏李种间杂交新品种中试及丰产栽培技术[J]. 中国农村科技, 2006,(8): 53. |
| LI Fangdong. Introduction to the project of transforming agricultural achievements into funds: pilot test and high-yield cultivation techniques of new interspecific hybrid varieties of apricot and plum[J]. China Rural Science & Technology, 2006,(8): 53. | |
| [4] | Kevers C, Pincemail J, Tabart J, et al. Influence of cultivar, harvest time, storage conditions, and peeling on the antioxidant capacity and phenolic and ascorbic acid contents of apples and pears[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2011, 59(11): 6165-6171. |
| [5] | Mahmood T, Anwar F, Abbas M, et al. Compositional variation in sugars and organic acids at different maturity stages in selected small fruits from Pakistan[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2012, 13(2): 1380-1392. |
| [6] | Pereira T, Tijskens L M M, Vanoli M, et al. Assessing the harvest maturity of Brazilian mangoes[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 2010(880): 269-276. |
| [7] | Mendoza F, Aguilera J. Application of image analysis for classification of ripening bananas[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2004, 69(9): E471-E477. |
| [8] | Olmo M, Nadas A, García J M. Nondestructive methods to evaluate maturity level of oranges[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2000, 65(2): 365-369. |
| [9] | Thai C N, Shewfelt R L. Seasonal variability of tomato color thermal kinetics[J]. Transactions of the ASAE, 1991, 34(4): 1830-1835. |
| [10] | Boynton B B, Welt B A, Sims C A, et al. Effects of low-dose electron beam irradiation on respiration, microbiology, color, and texture of fresh-cut cantaloupe[J]. Horttechnology, 2006, 15(4):802-807. |
| [11] | Mercado-Silva E, Benito-Bautista P, de los Angeles García-Velasco M. Fruit development, harvest index and ripening changes of guavas produced in central Mexico[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 1998, 13(2): 143-150. |
| [12] | Luchsinger L E, Walsh C S. Development of an objective and non-destructive harvest maturity index for peaches and nectarines[J]. Acta Horticulturae, 1998,(465): 679-688. |
| [13] | Hayama H, Tatsuki M, Nakamura Y. Combined treatment of aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG) and 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) reduces melting-flesh peach fruit softening[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 2008, 50(2/3): 228-230. |
| [14] | Taghadomi-Saberi S, Omid M, Emam-djomeh Z, et al. Determination of cherry color parameters during ripening by artificial neural network assisted image processing technique[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology, 2015, 17(3):589-600. |
| [15] | Rizzo M, Marcuzzo M, Zangari A, et al. Fruit ripeness classification: a survey[J]. Artificial Intelligence in Agriculture, 2023, 7: 44-57. |
| [16] | Knee M, Hatfield S G S, Smith S M. Evaluation of various indicators of maturity for harvest of apple fruit intended for long-term storage[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science, 1989, 64(4): 403-411. |
| [17] | 刘妍, 周新奇, 俞晓峰, 等. 无损检测技术在果蔬品质检测中的应用研究进展[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2020, 46(1): 27-37. |
| LIU Yan, ZHOU Xinqi, YU Xiaofeng, et al. Research progress of nondestructive testing techniques for fruit and vegetable quality[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2020, 46(1): 27-37. | |
| [18] | 田靖, 王玲. 核磁共振技术在农业中的应用研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2015, 43(1): 12-16. |
| TIAN Jing, WANG Ling. Research progress on application of nuclear magnetic resonance technology in agriculture[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(1): 12-16. | |
| [19] | 张保华, 李江波, 樊书祥, 等. 高光谱成像技术在果蔬品质与安全无损检测中的原理及应用[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014, 34(10): 2743. |
| ZHANG Baohua, LI Jiangbo, FAN Shuxiang, et al. Principles and applications of hyperspectral imaging technique in quality and safety inspection of fruits and vegetables[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2014, 34(10): 2743. | |
| [20] | 刘新社, 李静, 潘自舒. 1-MCP对美国杏李采后生理及贮藏品质的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2010,(2): 205-208. |
| LIU Xinshe, LI Jing, PAN Zishu. Effects of 1-MCP on post harvest physiology and storage quality of pluot to USA fruits[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2010,(2): 205-208. | |
| [21] | 周国庄. 几个早熟美国杏李品种栽培表现[J]. 山西果树, 2003,(5): 43-44. |
| ZHOU Guozhuang. Cultivation performance of several early-maturing American apricot and plum varieties[J]. Shanxi Fruits, 2003,(5): 43-44. | |
| [22] | LI W W, WEI Y J, FENG B B, et al. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics among different Prunus domestica × Armeniaca cultivars[J]. Agricultural Science & Technology, 2016, 17(3): 485-489. |
| [23] | 郁网庆, 吕平, 贾连文, 等. 苹果成熟度确定方法[J]. 中国果菜, 2012, 32(11): 37-39. |
| YU Wangqing, LYU Ping, JIA Lianwen, et al. Determination method of apple maturity[J]. China Fruit Vegetable, 2012, 32(11): 37-39. | |
| [24] | 邵蒲芬, 胡西琴, 王日葵, 等. 锦橙贮藏果实适宜采收指标的研究[J]. 中国柑桔, 1991, (3): 24-25. |
| SHAO Pufen, HU Xiqin, WANG Rikui, et al. A Study on the suitable harvesting indicators of Jin orange fruits during storage[J] Chinese Citrus, 1991, (3): 24-25. | |
| [25] | 鲍佳生, 潘丙珍, 黄雄俊, 等. 梅州蜜柚不同采摘期果实成熟度评价[J/OL]. 浙江农业科学, 2023: 1-5. (2023-08-14). |
| BAO Jiasheng, PAN Bingzhen, HUANG Xiongjun, et al. Evaluation on fruit maturity of Meizhou honey pomelo in different picking periods[J/OL]. China Industrial Economics, 2023: 1-5. (2023-08-14). | |
| [26] | 北京市农业学校. 李中涛. 果树栽培学实验实习指导: 全国中等农业学校试用教材果树专业用[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1984. |
| Beijing Agricultural School. Li Zhongtao. Experimental and Practical Guidance for Fruit Tree Cultivation: A Trial Textbook for National Secondary Agricultural Schools, for Fruit Tree Specialization Use[M]. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1984. | |
| [27] | 王明霞, 孙中平, 于唐丽, 等. 不同种类及相同种类不同品种蔬菜的粗纤维含量分析[J]. 科技资讯, 2018, 16(13): 212-213. |
| WANG Mingxia, SUN Zhongping, YU Tangli, et al. Analysis of crude fiber content of different kinds of vegetables and different varieties of the same kind[J]. Science & Technology Information, 2018, 16(13): 212-213. | |
| [28] | 王武, 邓烈, 何绍兰, 等. 不同套袋时间对早香橘橙果实色泽的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(7): 415-421. |
| WANG Wu, DENG Lie, HE Shaolan, et al. Effects of different bagging time on the color and luster in Zaoxiang mandarin fruit[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007, 23(7): 415-421. | |
| [29] | Speirs J, Lee E, Brady C J, et al. Endopolygalacturonase: messenger RNA, enzyme and softening in the ripening fruit of a range of tomato genotypes[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 1990, 135(5): 576-582. |
| [30] | 王学坤, 胡丽诗, 王浩, 等. 威海地区3个苹果品种果实适宜采收期的确定[J]. 果树学报, 2022, 39(9): 1691-1700. |
| WANG Xuekun, HU Lishi, WANG Hao, et al. Determination of optimal harvest dates for three apple cultivars in Weihai, Shandong[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2022, 39(9): 1691-1700. | |
| [31] | 李建华, 王春生, 郭黄萍, 等. 玉露香梨的贮藏特性及保鲜技术[J]. 山西果树, 2006,(4): 13-14. |
| LI Jianhua, WANG Chunsheng, GUO Huangping, et al. The storage characteristics and preservation techniques of Yulu fragrant pear[J]. Shanxi Fruits, 2006,(4): 13-14. | |
| [32] | Kan E, Sargent S, Cantliffe D, et al. Harvest maturity and storage temperature affect postharvest quality of ‘wanda’ datil hot pepper grown under protected culture[J]. HortTechnology, 2019, 29(4):1-6. |
| [33] | Cherian S, Figueroa C R, Nair H. ‘Movers and shakers’ in the regulation of fruit ripening: a cross-dissection of climacteric versus non-climacteric fruit[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(17): 4705-4722. |
| [34] | 薛晓敏, 韩雪平, 王贵平, 等. 不同成熟度对李果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2020, 38(3): 26-36. |
| XUE Xiaomin, HAN Xueping, WANG Guiping, et al. Effects of different maturities on characteristics of plum fruit quality[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2020, 38(3): 26-36. | |
| [35] | 杨婷婷, 朱璇, 向玉洁, 等. 采收成熟度对杏果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 现代食品科技, 2015, 31(7): 277-282. |
| YANG Tingting, ZHU Xuan, XIANG Yujie, et al. Impact of harvest maturity on storage quality of apricot fruits[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2015, 31(7): 277-282. | |
| [36] | 冯立娟, 苑兆和, 尹燕雷, 等. 2个杏品种不同成熟期果实品质变化研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(16): 206-210. |
| FENG Lijuan, YUAN Zhaohe, YIN Yanlei, et al. Studies on the change of fruit quality target of two apricot cultivars in different maturation period[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(16): 206-210. | |
| [37] | 梁森苗, 朱婷婷, 张淑文, 等. 杨梅果实发育成熟度与颜色变化规律探究[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(6): 879-882. |
| LIANG Senmiao, Zhu Tingting, Zhang Shuwen, et al. Study on the maturity and color change of Chinese bayberry[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 60(6): 879-882. | |
| [38] | 宋成秀, 张修德, 宋成香, 等. 苹果果实发育期果皮色泽与色素变化及其相关性分析[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(4): 106-110. |
| SONG Chengxiu, ZHANG Xiude, SONG Chengxiang, et al. Changes and correlation analysis of peel color and pigment during apple fruit development[J]. South China Fruits, 2016, 45(4): 106-110. | |
| [39] | 林旗华, 钟秋珍, 张泽煌. 浮宫1号杨梅及其早熟变异果实色泽发育研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2016, 45(3): 107-109. |
| LIN Qihua, ZHONG Qiuzhen, ZHANG Zehuang. Study on color development of Myrica rubra Fugong No.1 and its early-maturing variant fruit[J]. South China Fruits, 2016, 45(3): 107-109. | |
| [40] | 马培恰, 吴文, 王平, 等. 贡柑采收期果肉颜色变化与果实成熟度的关系研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(10): 63-64. |
| MA Peiqia, WU Wen, WANG Ping, et al. Relationship between the color change of Citrus Gonggan flesh and the maturity in harvest time[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 37(10): 63-64. | |
| [41] | 李珊珊, 郝义, 张婷婷, 等. 基于主成分分析法分析不同采收期对李果实贮藏品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2024, 45(16): 272-281. |
| LI Shanshan, HAO Yi, ZHANG Tingting, et al. Analysis of the effects of different harvesting periods on storage quality of plum fruit based on principal component analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2024, 45(16): 272-281. | |
| [42] | 张淑文, 梁森苗, 郑锡良, 等. 杨梅优株果实品质的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2018, 35(8): 977-986. |
| ZHANG Shuwen, LIANG Senmiao, ZHENG Xiliang, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of fruit quality in some advanced selections of Chinese bayberry[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2018, 35(8): 977-986. | |
| [43] | 周桂梅, 刘振兴, 陈健, 等. 基于因子分析和聚类分析对不同红小豆品种(系)性状的综合评价[J]. 现代农业科技, 2023,(9): 41-44. |
| ZHOU Guimei, LIU Zhenxing, CHEN Jian, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on characters of different adzuki bean varieties (lines) based on factor analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2023,(9): 41-44. | |
| [44] | 屈慧鸽, 孙宪忠, 赵淑兰, 等. 不同采收期的软枣猕猴桃贮藏效果研究[J]. 特产研究, 1997, 19(3): 11-14. |
| QU Huige, SUN Xianzhong, ZHAO Shulan, et al. Study on storage effect of Actinidia arguta in different harvest periods[J]. Special Wild Economic Animal and Plant Research, 1997, 19(3): 11-14. |
| [1] | BAI Feng, LUO Chunyan, ZHANG Kai, YU Lijuan, Nazhakaiti Ainiwaner, MA Junde, Jumaheng Tayierbieke, Talihati Kemailebayi, Aminiguti Abulaizi, Maerziya Yasen, ZHOU Xirong, ZHANG Yanhua. Correlation and principal component analysis of body weight and body size in Kazakh sheep [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(6): 1552-1560. |
| [2] | FAN Depeng, CHEN Yupeng, SHI Jie, JU Yanjun, XING Binde, JIANG Yinghong, LIU Yi, ZHAO Duoyong. Analysis and evaluation of potato quality traits of different potato varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(5): 1111-1120. |
| [3] | LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature tolerance of different varieties of spring wheat seeds during germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 820-828. |
| [4] | HAO Xiyu, ZHANG Zhongjuan, ZHENG Chengdong, ZHANG Siwen, ZHANG Jin, ZHENG Chunxiu, WU Shikai, WANG Xue. Comparative analysis of agronomic traits and yield of different fresh corn varieties (series) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 837-849. |
| [5] | YE Duoduo, MENG Xintao, Gulimire Zununa, Abidaimu Abudureyimu, Kuerbannayi Tuerxunmaimaiti, ZHANG Ting, MA Yan, PAN Yan. Quality change characteristics of not from concentrate (NFC) Lycium barbarum juice during processing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 361-372. |
| [6] | WANG Heya, LUO Jingjing, MENG Ling, LI Huaisheng, AI Haifeng, JIA Donghai. Comprehensive evaluation of new variety(strain) in Taer Basin based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 118-128. |
| [7] | MIAO Yu, CHEN Cuixia, MA Yanming, XING Guofang, DONG Yusheng, CHEN Zhijun, WANG Xian, XIANG Li. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of 276 Central Asian barley germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895. |
| [8] | XIAN Ouyang, LI Xiao, CHEN Yongcheng, WANG Xuze, ZHANG Fanfan, HOU Guoqing. Effects of Lactiplantibacillus plantarumand molasses on the silage of Silphium perfoliatum [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1505-1511. |
| [9] | YANG Lu, WANG Na, FAN Shaoli, CHENG Ping, LI Hong, WANG Yangdong. Analysis of phenotypic trait variation characteristics of Morus nigra L.germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1172-1181. |
| [10] | GAO Mutian, XIAO Yanmei, LIAO Zhijie, HUANG Cheng. Comprehensive evaluation of kernel and quality traits in maize-teosinte introgression line population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 885-891. |
| [11] | XIAN Ouyang, LI Xiao, CHEN Yongcheng, WANG Ting, WANG Xuze, ZHANG Fanfan, MA Chunhui. Effects of molasses and Lactobacillus plantarum on silage quality,microbial quantity and rumen degradation rate of hop branches and leaves [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(3): 719-726. |
| [12] | YANG Xiangbo, CHEN Liangyu, YANG Songnan, CHEN Xifeng, XING Weiming, LI Xueying, CONG Weixuan, ZANG Zhenyuan, ZANG Yuanbo, ZHANG Jun. Phenotype analysis and comprehensive evaluation of spring soybean germplasm resources from northeast China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933. |
| [13] | LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, GAO Yuan, MA Quanhui, LI Zhiguo, MA Xing. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on diurnal changes of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of sand-cultivated tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3006-3013. |
| [14] | XU Bin, WANG Zheng, SONG Zhanteng, Merhaba Paerhati, ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin, LI Yonghai, WU Fengyan, MIAO Fuhong. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031. |
| [15] | TANG Li, TIAN Kechuan, ZHANG Xinning, LIU Li, Abulikemu Adili, YANG Zhi, YANG Cunming, ZHANG Xiaoxue, HUANG Xixia, TIAN Yuezhen. Clustering and principal component analysis of Hotan sheep body weight indexes in different growth stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2853-2860. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||