

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 837-849.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.007
• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Cultivation Physiology · Physilolgy and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
HAO Xiyu1,2(
), ZHANG Zhongjuan1,2, ZHENG Chengdong1, ZHANG Siwen3,4, ZHANG Jin5, ZHENG Chunxiu6, WU Shikai7, WANG Xue1,2(
)
Received:2024-09-05
Online:2025-04-20
Published:2025-06-20
Supported by:
郝曦煜1,2(
), 张仲鹃1,2, 郑成栋1, 张斯文3,4, 张瑾5, 郑春秀6, 吴世凯7, 王雪1,2(
)
通讯作者:
王雪(1985-),女,安徽宣城人,高级工程师,博士,研究方向为功能食品开发,(E-mail)wangxue1@feihe.com
作者简介:郝曦煜(1990-),男,辽宁铁岭人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为作物育种与栽培,(E-mail)haoxiyu1990@foxmail.com
基金资助:CLC Number:
HAO Xiyu, ZHANG Zhongjuan, ZHENG Chengdong, ZHANG Siwen, ZHANG Jin, ZHENG Chunxiu, WU Shikai, WANG Xue. Comparative analysis of agronomic traits and yield of different fresh corn varieties (series)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 837-849.
郝曦煜, 张仲鹃, 郑成栋, 张斯文, 张瑾, 郑春秀, 吴世凯, 王雪. 不同鲜食玉米品种(系)农艺性状与产量的比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 837-849.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: https://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.007
| 序号 No. | 名称 Name | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|
| V1 | 白甜糯708 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V2 | 新糯玉10号 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V3 | 雪糯2号 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V4 | 京彩甜糯 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V5 | 美珍208 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V6 | 美珍204 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V7 | 美珍209 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V8 | 美珍206 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V9 | 京紫糯219 | 北京华奥农科育种开发有限责任公司 |
| V10 | 京科糯269 | 北京华奥农科育种开发有限责任公司 |
| V11 | 金糯2101 | 北京金农科种子科技有限公司 |
| V12 | 金银糯1881 | 北京金农科种子科技有限公司 |
| V13 | TN-2022-302-7 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V14 | N-2022-215 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V15 | N-2022-203-2 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V16 | N-2022-202-4 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V17 | N-2022-201-1 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V18 | N-2022-206-1 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V19 | N-2022-205-1 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V20 | N-2022-208 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V21 | T-2022-103 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V22 | N-2022-204 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V23 | N-2022-207-4 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V24 | N-2022-210 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V25 | N-2022-209 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V26 | N-2022-212 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V27 | N-2022-211 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V28 | N-2022-213 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V29 | 京甜糯807 | 北京四海种业有限责任公司 |
| V30 | 穗王 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V31 | 丝甜29 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V32 | 丝甜7 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V33 | 金娃娃 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V34 | 密甜糯1号 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V35 | 斯达糯51 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V36 | 墨灵 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V37 | 密花甜糯3号 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V38 | 天紫23 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V39 | 雪甜7401 | 福州金苗种业有限公司 |
| V40 | 粘娃娃800 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V41 | 玲诺788 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V42 | 粘娃娃700 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V43 | 绿糯619 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V44 | 早白2017 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V45 | 金牛3号 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V46 | 黄甜糯521 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V47 | 白糯996 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V48 | 金牛2号 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V49 | 美玉27加甜糯 | 海南绿川种苗公司 |
| V50 | 美玉糯30 | 海南绿川种苗公司 |
| V51 | 万糯188 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V52 | 万黑糯109 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V53 | 万黑甜糯209 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V54 | 万糯8号 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V55 | 垦粘12号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V56 | 垦粘6号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V57 | 垦裕甜1号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V58 | 垦甜糯18A | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V59 | 垦粘7号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V60 | 嘿甜88 | 荆州市恒彩农业科技有限公司 |
| V61 | 白冰甜 | 荆州市恒彩农业科技有限公司 |
| V62 | 必达荣本初 | 青岛金妈妈科技农业有限公司 |
| V63 | 必达荣宪和 | 青岛金妈妈科技农业有限公司 |
| V64 | 库普拉 | 瑞士先正达农业服务亚洲公司北京代表处 |
| V65 | 黑甜糯33号 | 山西农业大学玉米研究所 |
| V66 | 晋糯10号 | 山西农业大学玉米研究所 |
| V67 | 晋单糯1417 | 山西农业大学玉米研究所 |
| V68 | 黑金699 | 上海长禾农业发展有限公司 |
| V69 | 津白甜糯1号 | 天津市农业科学院 |
Tab.1 Varieties (series)in this experiment
| 序号 No. | 名称 Name | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|
| V1 | 白甜糯708 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V2 | 新糯玉10号 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V3 | 雪糯2号 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V4 | 京彩甜糯 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V5 | 美珍208 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V6 | 美珍204 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V7 | 美珍209 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V8 | 美珍206 | 北京宝丰种子有限公司 |
| V9 | 京紫糯219 | 北京华奥农科育种开发有限责任公司 |
| V10 | 京科糯269 | 北京华奥农科育种开发有限责任公司 |
| V11 | 金糯2101 | 北京金农科种子科技有限公司 |
| V12 | 金银糯1881 | 北京金农科种子科技有限公司 |
| V13 | TN-2022-302-7 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V14 | N-2022-215 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V15 | N-2022-203-2 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V16 | N-2022-202-4 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V17 | N-2022-201-1 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V18 | N-2022-206-1 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V19 | N-2022-205-1 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V20 | N-2022-208 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V21 | T-2022-103 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V22 | N-2022-204 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V23 | N-2022-207-4 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V24 | N-2022-210 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V25 | N-2022-209 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V26 | N-2022-212 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V27 | N-2022-211 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V28 | N-2022-213 | 北京市农林科学院 |
| V29 | 京甜糯807 | 北京四海种业有限责任公司 |
| V30 | 穗王 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V31 | 丝甜29 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V32 | 丝甜7 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V33 | 金娃娃 | 北京泰美华农业科技有限公司 |
| V34 | 密甜糯1号 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V35 | 斯达糯51 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V36 | 墨灵 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V37 | 密花甜糯3号 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V38 | 天紫23 | 北京中农斯达农业科技开发有限公司 |
| V39 | 雪甜7401 | 福州金苗种业有限公司 |
| V40 | 粘娃娃800 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V41 | 玲诺788 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V42 | 粘娃娃700 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V43 | 绿糯619 | 公主岭市绿育种业科技有限公司 |
| V44 | 早白2017 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V45 | 金牛3号 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V46 | 黄甜糯521 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V47 | 白糯996 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V48 | 金牛2号 | 哈尔滨市金牛种业有限公司 |
| V49 | 美玉27加甜糯 | 海南绿川种苗公司 |
| V50 | 美玉糯30 | 海南绿川种苗公司 |
| V51 | 万糯188 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V52 | 万黑糯109 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V53 | 万黑甜糯209 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V54 | 万糯8号 | 河北华穗种业有限公司 |
| V55 | 垦粘12号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V56 | 垦粘6号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V57 | 垦裕甜1号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V58 | 垦甜糯18A | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V59 | 垦粘7号 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院农作物开发研究所 |
| V60 | 嘿甜88 | 荆州市恒彩农业科技有限公司 |
| V61 | 白冰甜 | 荆州市恒彩农业科技有限公司 |
| V62 | 必达荣本初 | 青岛金妈妈科技农业有限公司 |
| V63 | 必达荣宪和 | 青岛金妈妈科技农业有限公司 |
| V64 | 库普拉 | 瑞士先正达农业服务亚洲公司北京代表处 |
| V65 | 黑甜糯33号 | 山西农业大学玉米研究所 |
| V66 | 晋糯10号 | 山西农业大学玉米研究所 |
| V67 | 晋单糯1417 | 山西农业大学玉米研究所 |
| V68 | 黑金699 | 上海长禾农业发展有限公司 |
| V69 | 津白甜糯1号 | 天津市农业科学院 |
Fig.1 Comparisons of the growth stages of different corn varieties(series) Notes: SD: Sowing date, SeD: Seedling date, TD: Tasseling date, AD: Anthesis date, SiD: Silking date, HD: Harvest date, GP: Growth period, PH: Plant height, EH: Ear height, SD: Stalk diameter, EL: Ear length, LBE: Length of rare ear, ED: Ear diameter, NR: Number of rows per ear, NK: Number of kernels per row, EW: Ear weight
| 主成分 Principal component | 特征根 Characteristic root | 方差解释率 Explanation rate of variance(%) | 累计 Accumulation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCA1 | 5.208 | 30.633 | 30.633 |
| PCA2 | 3.650 | 21.473 | 52.106 |
| PCA3 | 1.352 | 7.952 | 60.058 |
| PCA4 | 1.302 | 4.658 | 67.716 |
| PCA5 | 1.023 | 6.018 | 73.734 |
Tab.2 Total variance analysis of agronomic traits in fresh corn
| 主成分 Principal component | 特征根 Characteristic root | 方差解释率 Explanation rate of variance(%) | 累计 Accumulation (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PCA1 | 5.208 | 30.633 | 30.633 |
| PCA2 | 3.650 | 21.473 | 52.106 |
| PCA3 | 1.352 | 7.952 | 60.058 |
| PCA4 | 1.302 | 4.658 | 67.716 |
| PCA5 | 1.023 | 6.018 | 73.734 |
| 农艺性状 Agronomic traits | 主成分Principal component | 主成分系数Principal component cofficient | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| X1 | 0.522 | -0.376 | -0.496 | 0.320 | -0.035 | 0.229 | -0.197 | -0.426 | 0.281 | -0.035 |
| X2 | -0.420 | 0.786 | 0.309 | -0.031 | -0.026 | -0.184 | 0.412 | 0.266 | -0.027 | -0.025 |
| X3 | -0.113 | -0.535 | 0.090 | -0.076 | -0.564 | -0.050 | -0.280 | 0.078 | -0.067 | -0.558 |
| X4 | -0.332 | -0.263 | 0.315 | 0.457 | 0.352 | -0.145 | -0.137 | 0.271 | 0.401 | 0.348 |
| X5 | 0.682 | 0.379 | -0.097 | -0.097 | -0.243 | 0.299 | 0.198 | -0.083 | -0.085 | -0.240 |
| X6 | 0.269 | 0.804 | 0.084 | 0.204 | -0.220 | 0.118 | 0.421 | 0.072 | 0.179 | -0.218 |
| X7 | 0.214 | -0.180 | 0.086 | 0.531 | 0.364 | 0.094 | -0.094 | 0.074 | 0.466 | 0.360 |
| X8 | 0.507 | 0.622 | -0.226 | -0.177 | 0.304 | 0.222 | 0.326 | -0.194 | -0.155 | 0.301 |
| X9 | 0.279 | 0.841 | -0.160 | -0.136 | 0.168 | 0.122 | 0.440 | -0.138 | -0.119 | 0.166 |
| X10 | 0.334 | 0.550 | 0.310 | 0.425 | -0.154 | 0.146 | 0.288 | 0.266 | 0.373 | -0.153 |
| X11 | 0.723 | -0.289 | -0.037 | 0.098 | 0.151 | 0.317 | -0.151 | -0.032 | 0.086 | 0.150 |
| X12 | -0.621 | 0.204 | 0.044 | -0.165 | 0.203 | -0.272 | 0.107 | 0.038 | -0.145 | 0.201 |
| X13 | 0.668 | -0.103 | 0.613 | -0.060 | -0.025 | 0.293 | -0.054 | 0.527 | -0.052 | -0.025 |
| X14 | 0.296 | -0.331 | 0.143 | -0.585 | 0.356 | 0.130 | -0.173 | 0.123 | -0.513 | 0.352 |
| X15 | 0.770 | 0.041 | -0.392 | 0.104 | -0.008 | 0.338 | 0.021 | -0.337 | 0.092 | -0.008 |
| X16 | 0.915 | -0.153 | 0.255 | -0.087 | 0.030 | 0.401 | -0.080 | 0.220 | -0.076 | 0.030 |
| X17 | 0.857 | -0.211 | 0.298 | -0.134 | -0.041 | 0.375 | -0.110 | 0.256 | -0.117 | -0.041 |
Tab.3 Component matrix and component coefficient matrix of agronomic traits in fresh corn
| 农艺性状 Agronomic traits | 主成分Principal component | 主成分系数Principal component cofficient | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| X1 | 0.522 | -0.376 | -0.496 | 0.320 | -0.035 | 0.229 | -0.197 | -0.426 | 0.281 | -0.035 |
| X2 | -0.420 | 0.786 | 0.309 | -0.031 | -0.026 | -0.184 | 0.412 | 0.266 | -0.027 | -0.025 |
| X3 | -0.113 | -0.535 | 0.090 | -0.076 | -0.564 | -0.050 | -0.280 | 0.078 | -0.067 | -0.558 |
| X4 | -0.332 | -0.263 | 0.315 | 0.457 | 0.352 | -0.145 | -0.137 | 0.271 | 0.401 | 0.348 |
| X5 | 0.682 | 0.379 | -0.097 | -0.097 | -0.243 | 0.299 | 0.198 | -0.083 | -0.085 | -0.240 |
| X6 | 0.269 | 0.804 | 0.084 | 0.204 | -0.220 | 0.118 | 0.421 | 0.072 | 0.179 | -0.218 |
| X7 | 0.214 | -0.180 | 0.086 | 0.531 | 0.364 | 0.094 | -0.094 | 0.074 | 0.466 | 0.360 |
| X8 | 0.507 | 0.622 | -0.226 | -0.177 | 0.304 | 0.222 | 0.326 | -0.194 | -0.155 | 0.301 |
| X9 | 0.279 | 0.841 | -0.160 | -0.136 | 0.168 | 0.122 | 0.440 | -0.138 | -0.119 | 0.166 |
| X10 | 0.334 | 0.550 | 0.310 | 0.425 | -0.154 | 0.146 | 0.288 | 0.266 | 0.373 | -0.153 |
| X11 | 0.723 | -0.289 | -0.037 | 0.098 | 0.151 | 0.317 | -0.151 | -0.032 | 0.086 | 0.150 |
| X12 | -0.621 | 0.204 | 0.044 | -0.165 | 0.203 | -0.272 | 0.107 | 0.038 | -0.145 | 0.201 |
| X13 | 0.668 | -0.103 | 0.613 | -0.060 | -0.025 | 0.293 | -0.054 | 0.527 | -0.052 | -0.025 |
| X14 | 0.296 | -0.331 | 0.143 | -0.585 | 0.356 | 0.130 | -0.173 | 0.123 | -0.513 | 0.352 |
| X15 | 0.770 | 0.041 | -0.392 | 0.104 | -0.008 | 0.338 | 0.021 | -0.337 | 0.092 | -0.008 |
| X16 | 0.915 | -0.153 | 0.255 | -0.087 | 0.030 | 0.401 | -0.080 | 0.220 | -0.076 | 0.030 |
| X17 | 0.857 | -0.211 | 0.298 | -0.134 | -0.041 | 0.375 | -0.110 | 0.256 | -0.117 | -0.041 |
| 品种 Varieties | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F综 | 排名 Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1 | 1.192 | -1.130 | -0.614 | 0.776 | -1.025 | 0.097 | 33 |
| V2 | 0.466 | -1.214 | -1.168 | 0.266 | -0.138 | -0.270 | 41 |
| V3 | 0.753 | 0.579 | 0.814 | 1.143 | -0.676 | 0.633 | 22 |
| V4 | 2.635 | 2.349 | -1.811 | 0.467 | -2.698 | 1.412 | 9 |
| V5 | -0.317 | -1.849 | -1.580 | -0.217 | -0.411 | -0.897 | 54 |
| V6 | 1.471 | -2.125 | -0.327 | -0.223 | -0.654 | -0.120 | 37 |
| V7 | -0.148 | -2.607 | -1.648 | 1.299 | -0.740 | -0.924 | 56 |
| V8 | -2.267 | -2.900 | 1.942 | 2.019 | 1.315 | -1.260 | 59 |
| V9 | 0.914 | 0.645 | 0.102 | 0.259 | 1.330 | 0.714 | 20 |
| V10 | -0.721 | 0.534 | 0.022 | -2.033 | -0.778 | -0.416 | 43 |
| V11 | 1.130 | 0.661 | -0.199 | 0.258 | 0.093 | 0.675 | 21 |
| V12 | 1.691 | 0.565 | -1.741 | 1.227 | 0.681 | 0.862 | 19 |
| V13 | 2.678 | -0.678 | 0.392 | 1.828 | 0.710 | 1.206 | 13 |
| V14 | 2.751 | 2.728 | -1.376 | 2.353 | 0.813 | 2.100 | 1 |
| V15 | 1.982 | 0.172 | 1.117 | 0.404 | -1.463 | 0.916 | 18 |
| V16 | 1.353 | -0.659 | 0.331 | 0.795 | 0.696 | 0.545 | 23 |
| V17 | 1.786 | 1.353 | -0.231 | -0.338 | 0.010 | 1.077 | 15 |
| V18 | 0.806 | 0.163 | 0.978 | 0.112 | -1.393 | 0.386 | 28 |
| V19 | -0.634 | 0.639 | 0.485 | -0.618 | -1.151 | -0.183 | 39 |
| V20 | -1.583 | -1.339 | 1.340 | 1.104 | 1.186 | -0.692 | 50 |
| V21 | 0.615 | -3.944 | 0.531 | 1.066 | 0.392 | -0.693 | 51 |
| V22 | 3.410 | 0.701 | -0.375 | 0.125 | 0.745 | 1.654 | 4 |
| V23 | 3.790 | 0.372 | -2.195 | 0.584 | 1.752 | 1.650 | 5 |
| V24 | 2.184 | 1.032 | 0.461 | -0.377 | 1.175 | 1.314 | 11 |
| V25 | 1.346 | 1.286 | -0.960 | -2.579 | -0.844 | 0.493 | 25 |
| V26 | 2.453 | 0.714 | -0.994 | -1.161 | 0.983 | 1.080 | 14 |
| V27 | 2.326 | 0.205 | 1.060 | -1.012 | 0.398 | 1.068 | 16 |
| V28 | 2.906 | 0.727 | 0.820 | -2.330 | 0.448 | 1.302 | 12 |
| V29 | -1.614 | 0.682 | 0.333 | 0.611 | 0.771 | -0.310 | 42 |
| V30 | -2.448 | -2.576 | -1.867 | -0.824 | 0.847 | -1.985 | 67 |
| V31 | -1.898 | -2.453 | -0.308 | 0.279 | -1.215 | -1.606 | 62 |
| V32 | -1.631 | -4.642 | -0.194 | 0.285 | -1.287 | -2.126 | 68 |
| V33 | -2.646 | -2.543 | -0.650 | 1.258 | -1.784 | -1.925 | 66 |
| V34 | 1.680 | 3.071 | -0.567 | 1.979 | -1.002 | 1.655 | 3 |
| V35 | 1.677 | 2.550 | -0.363 | -0.066 | 0.523 | 1.436 | 7 |
| V36 | -2.545 | -0.740 | -2.031 | -0.108 | -0.121 | -1.513 | 61 |
| V37 | -4.382 | 3.025 | 1.080 | 0.000 | 0.396 | -0.791 | 53 |
| V38 | -1.279 | 3.364 | -0.836 | 1.694 | -0.033 | 0.532 | 24 |
| V39 | -0.737 | -4.542 | 0.616 | -1.085 | -0.469 | -1.713 | 63 |
| V40 | -5.578 | 3.209 | -0.109 | 0.062 | -0.759 | -1.450 | 60 |
| V41 | -3.786 | 2.988 | 0.743 | -1.577 | 0.253 | -0.766 | 52 |
| V42 | -6.917 | 3.258 | -1.226 | -0.264 | -0.855 | -2.154 | 69 |
| V43 | -0.319 | 0.443 | 0.615 | -1.692 | 0.408 | -0.079 | 36 |
| V44 | 1.971 | -2.817 | 1.471 | -2.034 | -0.290 | -0.078 | 35 |
| V45 | 3.414 | -0.923 | -0.206 | -1.449 | 0.871 | 1.048 | 17 |
| V46 | -0.393 | -0.995 | 0.170 | 0.001 | -0.386 | -0.466 | 46 |
| V47 | -1.135 | 0.107 | 1.047 | 1.215 | 0.982 | -0.121 | 38 |
| V48 | -2.180 | -0.838 | 1.098 | 0.175 | 1.407 | -0.898 | 55 |
| V49 | -1.745 | 1.127 | 1.087 | -0.231 | 0.700 | -0.246 | 40 |
| V50 | 0.315 | -0.207 | 2.798 | -0.429 | -0.615 | 0.278 | 30 |
| V51 | 3.266 | 0.863 | 0.266 | 0.347 | -1.021 | 1.590 | 6 |
| V52 | 3.624 | 0.944 | 2.532 | -0.032 | -1.418 | 1.934 | 2 |
| V53 | 1.179 | -0.907 | 0.765 | 0.484 | -0.728 | 0.299 | 29 |
| V54 | 0.583 | 0.243 | -0.953 | -1.273 | -1.169 | -0.017 | 34 |
| V55 | -1.053 | 0.130 | -0.855 | 0.122 | 0.123 | -0.469 | 47 |
| V56 | 1.041 | 0.984 | 0.056 | -2.446 | -0.092 | 0.463 | 26 |
| V57 | -2.336 | -0.618 | 0.699 | 0.035 | -0.289 | -1.095 | 57 |
| V58 | -4.928 | 1.020 | -0.418 | -1.076 | 1.670 | -1.771 | 64 |
| V59 | -0.399 | -1.024 | -0.118 | -1.321 | 1.127 | -0.522 | 49 |
| V60 | -0.883 | -0.350 | 1.581 | -0.091 | -1.546 | -0.434 | 45 |
| V61 | -2.445 | -3.234 | 0.544 | 0.110 | -0.004 | -1.888 | 65 |
| V62 | 0.959 | 2.287 | 0.973 | 1.097 | 1.226 | 1.383 | 10 |
| V63 | 1.071 | 1.521 | 2.875 | 1.601 | 0.653 | 1.417 | 8 |
| V64 | -1.362 | -2.428 | -1.314 | 1.372 | 2.005 | -1.108 | 58 |
| V65 | -0.460 | -0.111 | -0.978 | -2.273 | 1.714 | -0.425 | 44 |
| V66 | 1.291 | -0.647 | -1.691 | -0.781 | 0.990 | 0.165 | 31 |
| V67 | 1.399 | -0.820 | -1.663 | 0.215 | -0.993 | 0.104 | 32 |
| V68 | -2.230 | 1.934 | -1.034 | 0.809 | -1.165 | -0.486 | 48 |
| V69 | -1.116 | 2.686 | 0.855 | 0.104 | -0.184 | 0.407 | 27 |
Tab.4 Evaluation results of agronomic traits of fresh corn
| 品种 Varieties | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | F5 | F综 | 排名 Ranking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| V1 | 1.192 | -1.130 | -0.614 | 0.776 | -1.025 | 0.097 | 33 |
| V2 | 0.466 | -1.214 | -1.168 | 0.266 | -0.138 | -0.270 | 41 |
| V3 | 0.753 | 0.579 | 0.814 | 1.143 | -0.676 | 0.633 | 22 |
| V4 | 2.635 | 2.349 | -1.811 | 0.467 | -2.698 | 1.412 | 9 |
| V5 | -0.317 | -1.849 | -1.580 | -0.217 | -0.411 | -0.897 | 54 |
| V6 | 1.471 | -2.125 | -0.327 | -0.223 | -0.654 | -0.120 | 37 |
| V7 | -0.148 | -2.607 | -1.648 | 1.299 | -0.740 | -0.924 | 56 |
| V8 | -2.267 | -2.900 | 1.942 | 2.019 | 1.315 | -1.260 | 59 |
| V9 | 0.914 | 0.645 | 0.102 | 0.259 | 1.330 | 0.714 | 20 |
| V10 | -0.721 | 0.534 | 0.022 | -2.033 | -0.778 | -0.416 | 43 |
| V11 | 1.130 | 0.661 | -0.199 | 0.258 | 0.093 | 0.675 | 21 |
| V12 | 1.691 | 0.565 | -1.741 | 1.227 | 0.681 | 0.862 | 19 |
| V13 | 2.678 | -0.678 | 0.392 | 1.828 | 0.710 | 1.206 | 13 |
| V14 | 2.751 | 2.728 | -1.376 | 2.353 | 0.813 | 2.100 | 1 |
| V15 | 1.982 | 0.172 | 1.117 | 0.404 | -1.463 | 0.916 | 18 |
| V16 | 1.353 | -0.659 | 0.331 | 0.795 | 0.696 | 0.545 | 23 |
| V17 | 1.786 | 1.353 | -0.231 | -0.338 | 0.010 | 1.077 | 15 |
| V18 | 0.806 | 0.163 | 0.978 | 0.112 | -1.393 | 0.386 | 28 |
| V19 | -0.634 | 0.639 | 0.485 | -0.618 | -1.151 | -0.183 | 39 |
| V20 | -1.583 | -1.339 | 1.340 | 1.104 | 1.186 | -0.692 | 50 |
| V21 | 0.615 | -3.944 | 0.531 | 1.066 | 0.392 | -0.693 | 51 |
| V22 | 3.410 | 0.701 | -0.375 | 0.125 | 0.745 | 1.654 | 4 |
| V23 | 3.790 | 0.372 | -2.195 | 0.584 | 1.752 | 1.650 | 5 |
| V24 | 2.184 | 1.032 | 0.461 | -0.377 | 1.175 | 1.314 | 11 |
| V25 | 1.346 | 1.286 | -0.960 | -2.579 | -0.844 | 0.493 | 25 |
| V26 | 2.453 | 0.714 | -0.994 | -1.161 | 0.983 | 1.080 | 14 |
| V27 | 2.326 | 0.205 | 1.060 | -1.012 | 0.398 | 1.068 | 16 |
| V28 | 2.906 | 0.727 | 0.820 | -2.330 | 0.448 | 1.302 | 12 |
| V29 | -1.614 | 0.682 | 0.333 | 0.611 | 0.771 | -0.310 | 42 |
| V30 | -2.448 | -2.576 | -1.867 | -0.824 | 0.847 | -1.985 | 67 |
| V31 | -1.898 | -2.453 | -0.308 | 0.279 | -1.215 | -1.606 | 62 |
| V32 | -1.631 | -4.642 | -0.194 | 0.285 | -1.287 | -2.126 | 68 |
| V33 | -2.646 | -2.543 | -0.650 | 1.258 | -1.784 | -1.925 | 66 |
| V34 | 1.680 | 3.071 | -0.567 | 1.979 | -1.002 | 1.655 | 3 |
| V35 | 1.677 | 2.550 | -0.363 | -0.066 | 0.523 | 1.436 | 7 |
| V36 | -2.545 | -0.740 | -2.031 | -0.108 | -0.121 | -1.513 | 61 |
| V37 | -4.382 | 3.025 | 1.080 | 0.000 | 0.396 | -0.791 | 53 |
| V38 | -1.279 | 3.364 | -0.836 | 1.694 | -0.033 | 0.532 | 24 |
| V39 | -0.737 | -4.542 | 0.616 | -1.085 | -0.469 | -1.713 | 63 |
| V40 | -5.578 | 3.209 | -0.109 | 0.062 | -0.759 | -1.450 | 60 |
| V41 | -3.786 | 2.988 | 0.743 | -1.577 | 0.253 | -0.766 | 52 |
| V42 | -6.917 | 3.258 | -1.226 | -0.264 | -0.855 | -2.154 | 69 |
| V43 | -0.319 | 0.443 | 0.615 | -1.692 | 0.408 | -0.079 | 36 |
| V44 | 1.971 | -2.817 | 1.471 | -2.034 | -0.290 | -0.078 | 35 |
| V45 | 3.414 | -0.923 | -0.206 | -1.449 | 0.871 | 1.048 | 17 |
| V46 | -0.393 | -0.995 | 0.170 | 0.001 | -0.386 | -0.466 | 46 |
| V47 | -1.135 | 0.107 | 1.047 | 1.215 | 0.982 | -0.121 | 38 |
| V48 | -2.180 | -0.838 | 1.098 | 0.175 | 1.407 | -0.898 | 55 |
| V49 | -1.745 | 1.127 | 1.087 | -0.231 | 0.700 | -0.246 | 40 |
| V50 | 0.315 | -0.207 | 2.798 | -0.429 | -0.615 | 0.278 | 30 |
| V51 | 3.266 | 0.863 | 0.266 | 0.347 | -1.021 | 1.590 | 6 |
| V52 | 3.624 | 0.944 | 2.532 | -0.032 | -1.418 | 1.934 | 2 |
| V53 | 1.179 | -0.907 | 0.765 | 0.484 | -0.728 | 0.299 | 29 |
| V54 | 0.583 | 0.243 | -0.953 | -1.273 | -1.169 | -0.017 | 34 |
| V55 | -1.053 | 0.130 | -0.855 | 0.122 | 0.123 | -0.469 | 47 |
| V56 | 1.041 | 0.984 | 0.056 | -2.446 | -0.092 | 0.463 | 26 |
| V57 | -2.336 | -0.618 | 0.699 | 0.035 | -0.289 | -1.095 | 57 |
| V58 | -4.928 | 1.020 | -0.418 | -1.076 | 1.670 | -1.771 | 64 |
| V59 | -0.399 | -1.024 | -0.118 | -1.321 | 1.127 | -0.522 | 49 |
| V60 | -0.883 | -0.350 | 1.581 | -0.091 | -1.546 | -0.434 | 45 |
| V61 | -2.445 | -3.234 | 0.544 | 0.110 | -0.004 | -1.888 | 65 |
| V62 | 0.959 | 2.287 | 0.973 | 1.097 | 1.226 | 1.383 | 10 |
| V63 | 1.071 | 1.521 | 2.875 | 1.601 | 0.653 | 1.417 | 8 |
| V64 | -1.362 | -2.428 | -1.314 | 1.372 | 2.005 | -1.108 | 58 |
| V65 | -0.460 | -0.111 | -0.978 | -2.273 | 1.714 | -0.425 | 44 |
| V66 | 1.291 | -0.647 | -1.691 | -0.781 | 0.990 | 0.165 | 31 |
| V67 | 1.399 | -0.820 | -1.663 | 0.215 | -0.993 | 0.104 | 32 |
| V68 | -2.230 | 1.934 | -1.034 | 0.809 | -1.165 | -0.486 | 48 |
| V69 | -1.116 | 2.686 | 0.855 | 0.104 | -0.184 | 0.407 | 27 |
| 性状 Traits | 项目 Item | 类群Cluster | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | ||
| 播种期-出苗期 SD-SeD | 均值(d) | 8.00 | 15.14 | 11.47 | 16.64 | 13.71 |
| 变异系数(%) | 12.50 | 22.11 | 15.06 | 20.70 | 22.51 | |
| 出苗期-抽穗期 SeD-TD | 均值(d) | 66.20 | 46.14 | 57.80 | 51.73 | 50.54 |
| 变异系数(%) | 10.04 | 7.60 | 6.90 | 11.14 | 6.60 | |
| 抽穗期-散粉期 TD-AD | 均值(d) | 2.00 | 2.79 | 1.80 | 1.91 | 2.17 |
| 变异系数(%) | 0.00 | 40.27 | 47.88 | 49.44 | 29.40 | |
| 散粉期-吐丝期 AD-SiD | 均值(d) | 2.40 | 3.29 | 1.80 | 2.18 | 0.75 |
| 变异系数(%) | 22.82 | 65.85 | 94.37 | 100.03 | 125.88 | |
| 吐丝期-收获期 SiD-HD | 均值(d) | 26.60 | 28.21 | 31.47 | 36.36 | 33.38 |
| 变异系数(%) | 8.65 | 15.05 | 13.64 | 7.71 | 12.86 | |
| 生育日数 Number of growing days | 均值(d) | 105.20 | 95.57 | 104.33 | 108.82 | 100.54 |
| 变异系数(%) | 4.72 | 4.45 | 5.20 | 3.41 | 3.98 | |
| 叶绿素 Chlorophyli | 均值(SPAD) | 51.80 | 54.40 | 56.37 | 54.79 | 53.67 |
| 变异系数(%) | 3.56 | 5.94 | 4.70 | 5.38 | 6.40 | |
| 株高 Plant height | 均值(cm) | 265.10 | 226.08 | 263.88 | 293.34 | 275.74 |
| 变异系数(%) | 5.90 | 7.72 | 7.03 | 8.29 | 9.83 | |
| 穗位高 Ear height | 均值(cm) | 139.31 | 61.65 | 112.65 | 133.74 | 118.31 |
| 变异系数(%) | 7.64 | 23.41 | 17.35 | 16.43 | 16.31 | |
| 茎粗 Stem diameter | 均值(cm) | 2.63 | 2.44 | 2.81 | 3.02 | 2.74 |
| 变异系数(%) | 8.39 | 10.28 | 6.29 | 8.24 | 9.88 | |
| 穗长 Spike length | 均值(cm) | 16.64 | 20.66 | 20.13 | 22.08 | 21.13 |
| 变异系数(%) | 14.89 | 6.32 | 4.46 | 4.95 | 5.04 | |
| 秃尖长 Bald tip long | 均值(cm) | 2.64 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.06 | 0.31 |
| 变异系数(%) | 66.18 | 140.44 | 100.01 | 221.91 | 212.45 | |
| 穗粗 Ear diameter | 均值(cm) | 4.48 | 4.81 | 4.95 | 5.17 | 5.04 |
| 变异系数(%) | 7.18 | 5.37 | 5.17 | 6.17 | 4.27 | |
| 穗行数 Ear row number | 均值(行) | 15.36 | 17.24 | 16.64 | 15.87 | 18.27 |
| 变异系数(%) | 14.13 | 7.92 | 11.07 | 11.07 | 10.26 | |
| 行粒数 Kernels per rou | 均值(粒) | 31.60 | 38.22 | 36.31 | 42.95 | 40.26 |
| 变异系数(%) | 8.55 | 5.40 | 8.06 | 9.91 | 4.30 | |
| 穗重 Spike weight | 均值(g) | 186.84 | 298.47 | 312.27 | 388.81 | 362.83 |
| 变异系数(%) | 19.23 | 15.82 | 13.13 | 10.92 | 10.02 | |
| 产量 Production | 均值(kg/hm2) | 6 485.47 | 10 003.13 | 9 959.61 | 13 173.81 | 12 489.91 |
| 变异系数(%) | 28.23 | 18.16 | 15.07 | 17.18 | 13.56 | |
Tab.5 Mean and variation coefficient of agronomic traits in different groups
| 性状 Traits | 项目 Item | 类群Cluster | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | Ⅳ | Ⅴ | ||
| 播种期-出苗期 SD-SeD | 均值(d) | 8.00 | 15.14 | 11.47 | 16.64 | 13.71 |
| 变异系数(%) | 12.50 | 22.11 | 15.06 | 20.70 | 22.51 | |
| 出苗期-抽穗期 SeD-TD | 均值(d) | 66.20 | 46.14 | 57.80 | 51.73 | 50.54 |
| 变异系数(%) | 10.04 | 7.60 | 6.90 | 11.14 | 6.60 | |
| 抽穗期-散粉期 TD-AD | 均值(d) | 2.00 | 2.79 | 1.80 | 1.91 | 2.17 |
| 变异系数(%) | 0.00 | 40.27 | 47.88 | 49.44 | 29.40 | |
| 散粉期-吐丝期 AD-SiD | 均值(d) | 2.40 | 3.29 | 1.80 | 2.18 | 0.75 |
| 变异系数(%) | 22.82 | 65.85 | 94.37 | 100.03 | 125.88 | |
| 吐丝期-收获期 SiD-HD | 均值(d) | 26.60 | 28.21 | 31.47 | 36.36 | 33.38 |
| 变异系数(%) | 8.65 | 15.05 | 13.64 | 7.71 | 12.86 | |
| 生育日数 Number of growing days | 均值(d) | 105.20 | 95.57 | 104.33 | 108.82 | 100.54 |
| 变异系数(%) | 4.72 | 4.45 | 5.20 | 3.41 | 3.98 | |
| 叶绿素 Chlorophyli | 均值(SPAD) | 51.80 | 54.40 | 56.37 | 54.79 | 53.67 |
| 变异系数(%) | 3.56 | 5.94 | 4.70 | 5.38 | 6.40 | |
| 株高 Plant height | 均值(cm) | 265.10 | 226.08 | 263.88 | 293.34 | 275.74 |
| 变异系数(%) | 5.90 | 7.72 | 7.03 | 8.29 | 9.83 | |
| 穗位高 Ear height | 均值(cm) | 139.31 | 61.65 | 112.65 | 133.74 | 118.31 |
| 变异系数(%) | 7.64 | 23.41 | 17.35 | 16.43 | 16.31 | |
| 茎粗 Stem diameter | 均值(cm) | 2.63 | 2.44 | 2.81 | 3.02 | 2.74 |
| 变异系数(%) | 8.39 | 10.28 | 6.29 | 8.24 | 9.88 | |
| 穗长 Spike length | 均值(cm) | 16.64 | 20.66 | 20.13 | 22.08 | 21.13 |
| 变异系数(%) | 14.89 | 6.32 | 4.46 | 4.95 | 5.04 | |
| 秃尖长 Bald tip long | 均值(cm) | 2.64 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.06 | 0.31 |
| 变异系数(%) | 66.18 | 140.44 | 100.01 | 221.91 | 212.45 | |
| 穗粗 Ear diameter | 均值(cm) | 4.48 | 4.81 | 4.95 | 5.17 | 5.04 |
| 变异系数(%) | 7.18 | 5.37 | 5.17 | 6.17 | 4.27 | |
| 穗行数 Ear row number | 均值(行) | 15.36 | 17.24 | 16.64 | 15.87 | 18.27 |
| 变异系数(%) | 14.13 | 7.92 | 11.07 | 11.07 | 10.26 | |
| 行粒数 Kernels per rou | 均值(粒) | 31.60 | 38.22 | 36.31 | 42.95 | 40.26 |
| 变异系数(%) | 8.55 | 5.40 | 8.06 | 9.91 | 4.30 | |
| 穗重 Spike weight | 均值(g) | 186.84 | 298.47 | 312.27 | 388.81 | 362.83 |
| 变异系数(%) | 19.23 | 15.82 | 13.13 | 10.92 | 10.02 | |
| 产量 Production | 均值(kg/hm2) | 6 485.47 | 10 003.13 | 9 959.61 | 13 173.81 | 12 489.91 |
| 变异系数(%) | 28.23 | 18.16 | 15.07 | 17.18 | 13.56 | |
| [1] | 徐丽, 赵久然, 卢柏山, 等. 我国鲜食玉米种业现状及发展趋势[J]. 中国种业, 2020,(10): 14-18. |
| XU Li, ZHAO Jiuran, LU BaiShan, et al. The current Situation and development trend of fresh corn seed indeustry in China[J]. China Seed Industry, 2020,(10): 14-18. | |
| [2] | 宋俏姮, 孔亮亮, 刘俊峰, 等. 甜加糯玉米研究进展及发展对策分析[J/OL]. 广东农业科学, 2023: 1-11. (2023-10-13). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1267.S.20231011.1651.004.html. |
| SONG Qiaoheng, KONG Liangliang, LIU Junfeng, et al. Research Progress and Development Strategy Analysis of Sweet and Waxy Corn[J/OL]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2023: 1-11. (2023-10-13). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/44.1267.S.20231011.1651.004.html. | |
| [3] | 徐秀兰, 吴学宏, 张国珍, 等. 甜玉米种子携带真菌与种子活力关系分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(8): 1565-1570. |
|
XU Xiulan, WU Xuehong, ZHANG Guozhen, et al. Analysis of correlation between seed-associated fungi and seed vigor of sweet corn[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 39(8): 1565-1570.
DOI |
|
| [4] | 郝小琴, 吴子恺. 鲜食甜糯玉米主要营养品质的遗传规律研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(21): 5457-5460. |
| HAO Xiaoqin, WU Zikai. Study on the genetic law of main nutritional quality of the sweet-waxy maize as fresh food[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 34(21): 5457-5460. | |
| [5] | 周慧明. 谷物科学原理[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2001. |
| ZHOU Huiming. Principles of Cereal Science[M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2001. | |
| [6] | 薛万新, 赵秋菊, 钱海忠. 中国甜玉米产业现状与发展对策[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2023,(8): 14-22. |
| XUE Wanxin, ZHAO Qiuju, QIAN Haizhong. Current status of sweet corn industry in China and countermeasures for its development[J]. China Vegetables, 2023,(8): 14-22. | |
| [7] | 安林, 程乙, 罗上轲, 等. 鲜食糯玉米营养品质及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 山地农业生物学报, 2023, 42(5): 40-45. |
| AN Lin, CHENG Yi, LUO Shangke, et al. Research progress on nutritional quality of fresh waxy corn and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology, 2023, 42(5): 40-45. | |
| [8] | 史亚兴, 张保民. 鲜食玉米的发展与前景——探索我国甜玉米的北方市场[J]. 蔬菜, 2016,(12): 1-6. |
| SHI Yaxing, ZHANG Baomin. The Development and Prospects of Fresh Eating Corn - Exploring the Northern Market of Sweet Corn in China[J]. Vegetables, 2016,(12): 1-6. | |
| [9] | 李紫琪, 古艳婷, 郭燕枝, 等. 我国鲜食玉米标准体系及营养标准研究[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2022, 13(18): 5964-5973. |
| LI Ziqi, GU Yanting, GUO Yanzhi, et al. Study on the standard system and nutritional standard of fresh corn in China[J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2022, 13(18): 5964-5973. | |
| [10] | 李明, 甄善继, 高祺, 等. 黑龙江省作物种植结构演变特点与调整对策研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(5): 46-53. |
| LI Ming, ZHEN Shanji, GAO Qi, et al. Research on the evolution characteristics of crop planting structure and adjustment countermeasures in Heilongjiang province[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2018, 39(5): 46-53. | |
| [11] | 黑龙江省统计局, 国家统计局黑龙江调查总队. 黑龙江统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022. |
| Heilongjiang Provincial Bureau of Statistics, National Bureau of Statistics Heilongjiang Survey Team. Heilongjiang Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2022. | |
| [12] | 钱春荣, 顾万荣, 徐洪岩, 等. 科学规划黑龙江省鲜食玉米产业布局及加快玉米须产业链发展的思考[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2022,(7): 90-96. |
| QIAN Chunrong, GU Wanrong, XU Hongyan, et al. Strategic thinking on scientifically planning the layout of fresh maize industry and accelerating the development of maize silk industry chain in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022,(7): 90-96. | |
| [13] |
王丽冬, 冯一新, 徐建, 等. 13个鲜食甜、糯玉米品种(系)在黑龙江省比较研究试验[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(35): 24-30.
DOI |
| WANG Lidong, FENG Yixin, XU Jian, et al. A comparative study on thirteen fresh waxy sweet maize varieties(lines) in Heilongjiang[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(35): 24-30. | |
| [14] | 杨丽, 陈天宇, 王怀鹏, 等. 寒地半干旱区鲜食玉米品种适应性和品质性状分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(3): 54-60. |
| YANG Li, CHEN Tianyu, WANG Huaipeng, et al. Analysis of adaptability and quality characteristics of fresh eating waxy maize in the cold area of China[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(3): 54-60. | |
| [15] | 李青超, 王立达, 赵秀梅, 等. 齐齐哈尔市鲜食玉米品种比较试验[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020,(7): 11-14. |
| LI Qingchao, WANG Lida, ZHAO Xiumei, et al. Comparative test of fresh maize varieties in Qiqihar City[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(7): 11-14. | |
| [16] | 石云素. 玉米种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. |
| SHI Yunsu. Descriptors and data standard for maize (Zea mays L.)[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. | |
| [17] | 王贺然, 刘东明, 陈鹏狮, 等. 基于积温带重新划分的东北玉米熟型分布研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(5): 102-112. |
| WANG Heran, LIU Dongming, CHEN Pengshi, et al. Distribution of maturity types of maize based on accumulated temperature rezone in NorthEast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(5): 102-112. | |
| [18] | 王俊花, 闫建宾, 王瑞钢. 基于主成分、聚类和灰色关联度分析的超甜玉米杂交组合综合评价[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(5): 1108-1114. |
| WANG Junhua, YAN Jianbin, WANG Ruigang. Comprehensive evaluation of super sweet maize cross combinations based on principal component analysis, cluster analysis and gray correlation analysis[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2020, 51(5): 1108-1114. | |
| [19] | 王野, 陈豪, 郑艳, 等. 鲜食糯玉米(Zea mays l.sinensis kulesh)杂交种主要性状间的相关和通径分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2017, 15(10): 4196-4202. |
| WANG Ye, CHEN Hao, ZHENG Yan, et al. Genetic correlation and path analysis of main traits of fresh waxy maize(Zea mays L. sinensis kulesh) hybrids[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2017, 15(10): 4196-4202. | |
| [20] | 徐田军, 吕天放, 赵久然, 等. 玉米生产上3个主推品种光合特性、干物质积累转运及灌浆特性[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(3): 414-422. |
| XU Tianjun, LYU Tianfang, ZHAO Jiuran, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and translocation, grain filling parameter of three main maize varieties in production[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(3): 414-422. | |
| [21] | 张银杰, 王磊, 白由路, 等. 玉米不同层位叶片生理生化指标与SPAD值的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(10): 1805-1817. |
| ZHANG Yinjie, WANG Lei, BAI Youlu, et al. Relationship of physiological and biochemical indicators with SPAD values in maize leaves at different layers[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(10): 1805-1817. | |
| [22] | 赵洪, 张靖立, 禇云霞, 等. 基于DUS测试性状的上海鲜食玉米遗传多样性分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2022, 30(3): 24-31. |
| ZHAO Hong, ZHANG Jingli, Zhe Yunxia, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of fresh maize based on DUS characters in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2022, 30(3): 24-31. |
| [1] | QIAO Di, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, ZHANG Pengzhong, ZHANG Hao, BAO Longlong, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of RZWQM2-based nitrogen fertilizer transport mode on cotton growth and yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 807-819. |
| [2] | LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comprehensive evaluation of low temperature tolerance of different varieties of spring wheat seeds during germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 820-828. |
| [3] | MA Ruhai, HUANG Chunyan, CUI Huimei, ZHENG Yuehui, FANG Yuan, WANG Dengwei. Effects of different planting modes of yellow sand substrate on tomato yield and quality in solar greenhouse [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 903-910. |
| [4] | CAI Chenyang, GUO Limin, WU Bin. Process optimization of tomato and carrot mixed juice prepared by compound enzyme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 944-953. |
| [5] | JIAO Runxing, BU Dongsheng, SHAO Yanhui, ZHANG Tao, CHEN Ling, ZHANG Dongdong. Effects of “dry sowing and wet emergence” on water and salt distribution, nutrients and cotton yield in different salinized soils [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 572-583. |
| [6] | NIE Lingfan, ZHANG Jinshan, TIAN Wenqiang, SUN Ganggang, WANG Hongyi, ZHANG Jun, ZHANG Qiangbin, GUO Fei, WU Li, SHI Shubing. Effects of different water and nitrogen treatments on the growth, water and nitrogen use efficiency and yield of ultra-late sowing winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 584-592. |
| [7] | SUN Ganggang, GUO Fei, NIE Lingfan, TIAN Wenqiang, WANG Hongyi, SHI Yongqing, WU Li, AI Hongyu, ZHANG Jinshan, SHI Shubing. Effects of seed fertilizer separation on photosynthesis, dry matter accumulation and yield formation of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 593-599. |
| [8] | HAO Xiyu, LIU Tingting, WANG Hui, LENG Jingwen, GONG Shihang, LIU Wei. Selection and comprehensive evaluation of nitrogen-efficient foxtail millet varieties based on principal component analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(3): 619-626. |
| [9] | LIU Yue, LIAN Shihao, LI Jiahao, WANG Hongyi, TIAN Wenqiang, NIE Lingfan, SUN Ganggang, JIA Yonghong, SHI Shubing, YU Yuehua, ZHANG Jinshan. Effects of sowing dates and planting density on yield formation and quality of peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 278-285. |
| [10] | LU Mingkun, LI Junhong, Nilupaier Yusufujiang, PAN Xipeng, LIU Xiaocheng, ZHANG Zhenggui, PAN Zhanlei, ZHAI Menghua, ZHANG Yaopeng, ZHAO Wenqi, WANG Lihong, WANG Zhanbiao. Effect of silic on fertiliser application on the growth and development of cotton and its yield and quality [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 286-293. |
| [11] | WANG Yiding, ZHANG Kai, ZHANG Lingjian, ZHANG Hui, GUO Xiaomeng, CHEN Guoyue. Effects of drip irrigation on the growth and development, yield formation, and water use efficiency of cotton in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 294-301. |
| [12] | WANG Xiaoyan, BAI Yungang, CHAI Zhongping, LU Zhenlin, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, Amannisa . Effect of "dry sowing and wet emergence" on cotton growth and yield under the control of winter drip irrigation in off-cropping period [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 302-313. |
| [13] | LIU Yiyang, ZHOU Peng, LIU Jingjing, WANG Xiaomin, HU Xinhua, FU Jinjun, GAO Yanming, LI Jianshe. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 103 tomato germplasm resources in streamlined cultivation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 324-334. |
| [14] | LI Tianle, BAI Xinlu, AN Shijie, ZHENG Qiangqing, TANG Zhihui, ZHI Jinhu. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on the growth, fruit quality and yield of Korla Fragrant Pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 335-342. |
| [15] | YE Duoduo, MENG Xintao, Gulimire Zununa, Abidaimu Abudureyimu, Kuerbannayi Tuerxunmaimaiti, ZHANG Ting, MA Yan, PAN Yan. Quality change characteristics of not from concentrate (NFC) Lycium barbarum juice during processing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(2): 361-372. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||