Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.12.017

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (12): 3020-3031.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.12.017

• Soil Fertilizer · Storage and Preservation Processing · Horticultural Special Local Products • Previous Articles Next Articles

Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources

XU Bin¹(), WANG Zheng², SONG Zhanteng³, Merhaba Paerhati³, ZHU Jingrong³(), CHE Fengbin⁴(), LI Yonghai²^,⁴, WU Fengyan⁵, MIAO Fuhong⁶

1. Institute of Agro-Products Storage and Processing, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. Xinjiang Kangyuan Biotechnology Group Co., Ltd, Habahe Xinjiang 836700, China
3. Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards & Testing Technology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
4. Seabuckthorn Engineering Technology Research Center of Xinjiang, Habahe Xinjiang 836700, China
5. Fuhai County Forest and Grassland Administration,Fuhai Xinjiang 836400,China
6. Xinjiang Desert Craftsman Environmental Technology Co., Ltd, Korla Xinjiang 841000, China

Received:2024-04-02 Online:2024-12-20 Published:2025-01-16
Correspondence author: ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin
Supported by:
Key Scientific R & D Program Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region "Research and application demonstration of technologies to improve the quality of seabuckthorn products and value-added utilization of by-products"(2022B02005)

11份野生沙棘种质资源果实品质分析与综合评价

徐斌¹(), 王征², 宋占腾³, 玛尔哈巴·帕尔哈提³, 朱靖蓉³(), 车凤斌⁴(), 李永海²^,⁴, 武凤艳⁵, 苗福红⁶

1.新疆农业科学院农产品贮藏加工研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆康元生物技术集团股份有限公司,新疆哈巴河 836700
3.新疆农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
4.新疆沙棘工程技术研究中心,新疆哈巴河 836700
5.福海县林业和草原局,新疆福海 836400
6.新疆大漠工匠环境科技有限公司,新疆库尔勒 841000

通讯作者: 朱靖蓉,车凤斌
作者简介:徐斌(1985-),男,河南南阳人,副研究员,研究方向为农产品精深加工,(E-mail)978142325@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重点研发计划项目“沙棘产品品质提升与副产品高值化加工利用技术研发及应用示范”(2022B02005)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To conduct fruit quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of wild sea buckthorn germplasm resources in Xinjiang in the hope of clarifying the characteristics of its ermplasm resources and providing a theoretical basis for the development and utilization of its resources and the selection and breeding of new varieties.【Methods】 Through the investigation of wild sea-thorn germplasm resources, in Ili, Bozhou, Altay region of Xinjiang, with 11 wild sea buckthorn germplasm resources as the research object, the appearance phenotype discrimination was analyzed and identified, and their quality and active ingredient indicators were measured.Meanwhile, correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and systematic cluster analysis were performed to construct a comprehensive evaluation model, and the comprehensive scores of fruit quality were calculated and ranked.【Results】 The results showed that there were varying degrees of correlation between the fruit quality and active ingredient indicators of the 11 wild sea buckthorn germplasm resources.Principal component analysis extracted 3 principal components, with a cumulative contribution rate of 86.298%.A comprehensive evaluation model of the fruit quality of wild sea buckthorn germplasm resources was established.Systematic cluster analysis divided the 11 wild sea buckthorn germplasm resources into 3 categories, and the classification results were basically consistent with the comprehensive evaluation results of the principal components.【Conclusion】 The comprehensive evaluation model shows that AQ01, AB01, and AB02 are the excellent wild sea buckthorn germplasm resources collected, which are suitable for fresh consumption and processing into fruit juice, fruit candies, and fruit jams.

Key words: wild seabuckthorn; fruit; principal component analysis; comprehensive evaluation

摘要：

【目的】 综合评价新疆野生沙棘种质资源果实品质,分析野生沙棘种质资源特性,为野生沙棘资源开发利用、新品种选育提供理论依据。【方法】 调查采集野生沙棘种质资源,以新疆伊犁哈萨克自治州(简称伊犁州)、博尔塔拉蒙古自治州(简称博州)、阿勒泰地区的11个野生沙棘种质资源为研究对象,对其外观表型进行分析判别,测定果实营养品质及活性成分指标,并进行相关性、主成分和系统聚类分析,构建综合评价模型,计算果实品质综合得分并排序。【结果】 11份野生沙棘种质资源果实品质及活性成分指标间存在不同程度的相关性。主成分分析提取了3个主成分,累计贡献率为86.298%。建立了野生沙棘种质资源果实品质综合评价模型。系统聚类分析将11份野生沙棘种质资源分为3类,分类结果与主成分综合评价结果基本一致。【结论】 AQ01、AB01、AB02为所采集的野生沙棘优异种质资源,适合鲜食及加工成果汁、果脯、果酱等产品。

关键词: 野生沙棘, 果实, 主成分分析, 综合评价

CLC Number:

XU Bin, WANG Zheng, SONG Zhanteng, Merhaba Paerhati, ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin, LI Yonghai, WU Fengyan, MIAO Fuhong. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031.

徐斌, 王征, 宋占腾, 玛尔哈巴·帕尔哈提, 朱靖蓉, 车凤斌, 李永海, 武凤艳, 苗福红. 11份野生沙棘种质资源果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031.

Figures/Tables 9

References 22

[1]	马旭, 赵英, 韩炜, 等. 14种沙棘果实中氨基酸组成的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. DOI
	MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, et al. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of amino acids in seabuckthorn fruit[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. DOI
[2]	张东为, 赵鑫丹, 戈素芬, 等. 沙棘果实品质的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2023, 41(2): 1-10.
	ZHANG Dongwei, ZHAO Xindan, GE Sufen, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of sea buckthorn berry quality[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2023, 41(2): 1-10.
[3]	王珊珊, 张萍, 张冰冰, 等. 寒地沙棘种质资源果实品质分析与综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(13): 281-289.
	WANG Shanshan, ZHANG Ping, ZHANG Bingbing, et al. Fruit quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of seabuckthorn germplasm resources in cold region[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(13): 281-289.
[4]	Dinkar Gore D, Ahmad F, Tikoo K, et al. Comparative quantitative analysis of fruit oil from Hippophae rhamnoides (seabuckthorn) by qNMR, FTIR and GC-MS[J]. Chinese Herbal Medicines, 2023, 15(4): 607-613.
[5]	Tkacz K, Wojdyto A, Turkiewicz I P, et al. UPLC-PDA-Q/TOF-MS profiling of phenolic and carotenoid compounds and their influence on anticholinergic potential for AChE and BuChE inhibition and on-line antioxidant activity of selected HippophaÃ rhamnoides L. cultivars[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 309: 125766.
[6]	张焱, 高文远, 库尔班江. 新疆不同产地的野生沙棘种仁中的油脂脂肪酸和蛋白质氨基酸组分的研究[J]. 粮油加工, 2007,(10): 79-82.
	ZHANG Yan, GAO Wenyuan, KU Erbanjiang. The research on the fatty acid components and amino acid components of wild seabuckthorn from the different habits in Xinjiang[J]. Cereals and Oils Processing, 2007,(10): 79-82.
[7]	张文博, 库尔班江, 张焱. 新疆野生沙棘种仁蛋白的提取和氨基酸分析[J]. 粮油加工, 2008,(8): 56-58.
	ZHANG Wenbo, KU Erbanjiang, ZHANG Yan. Extraction and Amino Acid Analysis of Wild Sea Buckthorn Seed Kernel Protein in Xinjiang[J]. Cereals and Oils Processing, 2008,(8): 56-58.
[8]	方贵平, 毕金峰, 刘春海, 等. 中国四个地区代表性沙棘果实综合品质评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(21): 249-260.
	FANG Guiping, BI Jinfeng, LIU Chunhai, et al. Evaluation of the comprehensive quality of sea buckthorn fruit in four areas of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(21): 249-260.
[9]	胡建忠, 张滨, 高岩. 我国主要野生沙棘果实的黄酮含量分析[J]. 青海农林科技, 2021,(4): 8-12.
	HU Jianzhong, ZHANG Bin, GAO Yan. Analysis on total flavonoids of fruits from main natural seabuckthorn resources in China[J]. Science and Technology of Qinghai Agriculture and Forestry, 2021,(4): 8-12.
[10]	严鑫, 吴巨友, 贡鑫, 等. 不同产地圆黄梨果实品质差异分析[J]. 果树学报, 2021, 38(12): 2082-2090.
	YAN Xin, WU Juyou, GONG Xin, et al. Analysis of fruit quality of Wonhwang pear from different regions[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2021, 38(12): 2082-2090.
[11]	张建国, 罗红梅, 黄铨, 等. 大果沙棘不同品种果实特性比较研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18(6): 643-650.
	ZHANG Jianguo, LUO Hongmei, HUANG Quan, et al. A comparative study on berry characteristics of large berry cultivars of sea buckthorn[J]. Forest Research, 2005, 18(6): 643-650.
[12]	廉永善, 陈学林. 沙棘属植物的系统分类[J]. 沙棘, 1996,(1): 15-24.
	LIAN Yongshan, CHEN Xuelin. The Systematic Classification of Sea Buckthorn[J]. Seabuckthorn, 1996,(1): 15-24.
[13]	徐泽俊, 齐玉军, 邢兴华, 等. 黄淮海大豆种质农艺与品质性状分析及综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(2): 468-480. DOI
	XU Zejun, QI Yujun, XING Xinghua, et al. Analysis and evaluation of agronomic and quality traits in soybean germplasms from Huang-Huai-Hai Region[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(2): 468-480. DOI
[14]	纪龙, 申红芳, 徐春春, 等. 基于非线性主成分分析的绿色超级稻品种综合评价[J]. 作物学报, 2019, 45(7): 982-992. DOI
	JI Long, SHEN Hongfang, XU Chunchun, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of green super rice varieties based on nonlinear principal component analysis[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(7): 982-992. DOI
[15]	张伟清, 林媚, 王天玉, 等. 基于PCA分析和聚类分析的柑橘果实品质综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2023, 40(5): 902-918.
	ZHANG Weiqing, LIN Mei, WANG Tianyu, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of Citrus fruit quality based on principal component and cluster analysis[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2023, 40(5): 902-918.
[16]	陈学林, 廉永善. 沙棘属植物的分布格局及其成因[J]. 沙棘, 2007,(4): 1-5.
	CHEN Xuelin, LIAN Yongshan. The distribution pattern and causes of seabuckthorn plants[J]. Seabuckthorn Hippophae, 2007,(4): 1-5.
[17]	胡建忠, 金争平, 吕荣森. 新疆阿勒泰地区沙棘资源及种植开发[J]. 国际沙棘研究与开发, 2011,(1): 34-41.
	HU Jianzhong, JIN Zhengping, LYU Rongsen. The development of sea buckthorn resources and plantation in Xinjiang Altay region's[J]. The Global Seabuckthorn Research and Development, 2011,(1): 34-41.
[18]	薛鑫, 石胜友, 侯世奎. 龙眼‘蜀冠’×‘大乌圆’杂交后代果实品质性状多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(5): 827-836. DOI
	XUE Xin, SHI Shengyou, HOU Shikui. Comprehensive evaluation and diversity analysis of fruit quality traits in Longan ‘Shuguan’ × ‘dawuyuan’ sexual progenies[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(5): 827-836.
[19]	郭宝林, 杨俊霞, 李永慈, 等. 主成分分析法在仁用杏品种主要经济性状选种上的应用研究[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(6): 53-56.
	GUO Baolin, YANG Junxia, LI Yongci, et al. The application of principal component analysis on mainly economic characters and superior variety selection of apricot for nucleolus using[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2000, 36(6): 53-56.
[20]	喻华平, 赵志常, 高爱平, 等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析的23份黄皮种质资源的品质评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2022, 43(7): 1357-1364. DOI
	YU Huaping, ZHAO Zhichang, GAO Aiping, et al. Quality evaluation of 23 species of Clausena lansium(lour.) skeels germplasm resources based on principal component analysis and cluster analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2022, 43(7): 1357-1364. DOI
[21]	Cao Z L, Li T J, Li G Q, et al. Modular growth and clonal propagation of Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. sinensis in response to irrigation intensity[J]. Journal of Forestry Research, 2016, 27(5): 1019-1028.
[22]	李曦光, 李萧婷, 王蕾, 等. 基于空间差异的新疆沙棘资源果实品质及营养成分分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2023, 39(23): 268-275.
	LI Xiguang, LI Xiaoting, WANG Lei, et al. Fruit quality and medicinal components in Xinjiang sea buckthorn under spatial distribution differences[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2023, 39(23): 268-275.

编号No.	采样地点 Sampling site	坐标 Position
YC01	伊犁州察布查尔县绰乎尔乡绰乎尔村	81°06'02″E,43°54'24″N
YN01	伊犁州尼勒克县喀拉托别乡卡因德巴斯陶村	82°30'57″E,43°45'46″N
YG01	伊犁州巩留县阿尕尔森镇塔依吐罕村	82°29'16″E,43°26'09″N
YT01	伊犁州特克斯县阿克托海乡哈拉达斯村	82°14'58″E,43°14'19″N
YZ01	新疆生产建设兵团第四师77团昭苏马场	80°57'36″E,42°57'18″N
BW01	博乐温泉县扎乡青霍甲村	81°19'55″E,45°01'31″N
AH01	阿勒泰地区哈巴河县沙尔布拉克镇	86°00'10″E,42°10'44″N
AB01	阿勒泰地区布尔津县窝依莫克镇江格孜塔勒村	86°53'01″E,47°48'40″N
AB02	阿勒泰地区布尔津县窝依莫克镇江格孜塔勒村	86°52'44″E,47°48'39″N
AJ01	阿勒泰地区吉木乃县沙窝村林业站	85°46'31″E,47°45'30″N
AQ01	阿勒泰地区青河县塔克什肯镇蒙其克村	90°42'45″E,46°11'45″N

编号No.	采样地点 Sampling site	坐标 Position
YC01	伊犁州察布查尔县绰乎尔乡绰乎尔村	81°06'02″E,43°54'24″N
YN01	伊犁州尼勒克县喀拉托别乡卡因德巴斯陶村	82°30'57″E,43°45'46″N
YG01	伊犁州巩留县阿尕尔森镇塔依吐罕村	82°29'16″E,43°26'09″N
YT01	伊犁州特克斯县阿克托海乡哈拉达斯村	82°14'58″E,43°14'19″N
YZ01	新疆生产建设兵团第四师77团昭苏马场	80°57'36″E,42°57'18″N
BW01	博乐温泉县扎乡青霍甲村	81°19'55″E,45°01'31″N
AH01	阿勒泰地区哈巴河县沙尔布拉克镇	86°00'10″E,42°10'44″N
AB01	阿勒泰地区布尔津县窝依莫克镇江格孜塔勒村	86°53'01″E,47°48'40″N
AB02	阿勒泰地区布尔津县窝依莫克镇江格孜塔勒村	86°52'44″E,47°48'39″N
AJ01	阿勒泰地区吉木乃县沙窝村林业站	85°46'31″E,47°45'30″N
AQ01	阿勒泰地区青河县塔克什肯镇蒙其克村	90°42'45″E,46°11'45″N

编号 No.	百果质量 Hundred fruit mass (g)	果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter (mm)	果实横径 Fruit transverse diameter (mm)	果梗长度 Stem length (mm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index	果实形状 Fruit shape	果实色泽 Fruit color	树姿 Tree performance	叶片 Leaf	刺 Thorn
YC01	11.0	7.20	5.75	7.50	1.25	卵圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	披针叶形	刺少无分叉
YN01	16.0	8.04	6.19	6.00	1.30	卵圆形	黄色	高大,直立型	狭披针叶形	刺少无分叉
YG01	14.0	8.20	5.48	6.47	1.50	圆柱形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	狭披针叶形	刺多有分叉
YT01	19.0	7.05	6.20	4.94	1.14	卵圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	狭披针叶形	刺多有分叉
YZ01	14.0	6.50	7.50	2.70	0.98	圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	中等,任意型	狭披针叶形	刺多有分叉
BW01	12.0	7.64	5.28	6.46	1.45	圆柱形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	披针叶形	刺多有分叉
AH01	54.6	13.76	8.45	5.43	1.63	圆柱形	红色	中等,开张型	宽,叶尖渐尖	无刺
AB01	54.0	12.45	8.90	6.73	1.40	圆柱形	橘黄色,果底有红晕	矮小,开张型	宽,钝尖	刺少有分叉
AB02	52.0	11.46	8.87	6.40	1.29	卵圆形	金黄色,果底有红晕	矮小,紧凑型	宽,钝尖	刺少无分叉
AJ01	31.0	10.60	7.83	5.90	1.35	卵圆形	黄色	中等,任意型	宽,叶尖渐尖	刺多有分叉
AQ01	40.1	10.80	8.34	5.06	1.29	卵圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	中等,开张型	宽,叶尖渐尖	刺多有分叉

编号 No.	百果质量 Hundred fruit mass (g)	果实纵径 Fruit longitudinal diameter (mm)	果实横径 Fruit transverse diameter (mm)	果梗长度 Stem length (mm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index	果实形状 Fruit shape	果实色泽 Fruit color	树姿 Tree performance	叶片 Leaf	刺 Thorn
YC01	11.0	7.20	5.75	7.50	1.25	卵圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	披针叶形	刺少无分叉
YN01	16.0	8.04	6.19	6.00	1.30	卵圆形	黄色	高大,直立型	狭披针叶形	刺少无分叉
YG01	14.0	8.20	5.48	6.47	1.50	圆柱形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	狭披针叶形	刺多有分叉
YT01	19.0	7.05	6.20	4.94	1.14	卵圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	狭披针叶形	刺多有分叉
YZ01	14.0	6.50	7.50	2.70	0.98	圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	中等,任意型	狭披针叶形	刺多有分叉
BW01	12.0	7.64	5.28	6.46	1.45	圆柱形	黄色,果底有红晕	高大,任意型	披针叶形	刺多有分叉
AH01	54.6	13.76	8.45	5.43	1.63	圆柱形	红色	中等,开张型	宽,叶尖渐尖	无刺
AB01	54.0	12.45	8.90	6.73	1.40	圆柱形	橘黄色,果底有红晕	矮小,开张型	宽,钝尖	刺少有分叉
AB02	52.0	11.46	8.87	6.40	1.29	卵圆形	金黄色,果底有红晕	矮小,紧凑型	宽,钝尖	刺少无分叉
AJ01	31.0	10.60	7.83	5.90	1.35	卵圆形	黄色	中等,任意型	宽,叶尖渐尖	刺多有分叉
AQ01	40.1	10.80	8.34	5.06	1.29	卵圆形	黄色,果底有红晕	中等,开张型	宽,叶尖渐尖	刺多有分叉

编号 No.	可溶性固形物 Soluble solids content (%)	总糖 Total sugar (g/100g)	总酸 Total acidity (g/kg)	蛋白质 Protein (g/100g)	抗坏血酸 Ascorbic acid (mg/100g)	糖酸比 Sugar acid ratio	固酸比 Solid acid ratio	黄酮 Flavone (mg/g)	多酚 Polyphenol (g/100g)	SOD酶活力 Activity of SOD enzyme/U	VE (mg/100g)
YC01	9.6±0.11^e	1.41±0.42^g	3.19±0.43^b	0.653±0.01^h	273.44±3.5^d	0.44±0.02^g	3.01±0.54^h	12.149±0.32^bc	8.366±0.36^c	1210.631±7.89^c	8.611±0.23^b
YN01	10.5±0.24^d	2.37±0.52^d	2.06±0.58^d	1.007±0.04^d	76.18±2.2^j	1.15±0.01^c	5.10±0.30^bc	7.425±0.37^f	3.519±0.67^f	614.769±4.37^e	5.321±0.39^g
YG01	10.9±0.31^d	1.55±0.58^ef	2.88±0.63^bc	1.069±0.05^d	78.39±1.3^j	0.54±0.02^f	3.78±0.43^f	9.408±0.26^d	4.305±0.41^e	656.145±3.26^e	7.340±0.55^c
YT01	11.6±0.15^c	1.50±0.75^f	1.90±0.35^e	2.151±0.03^a	196.40±3.4^f	0.79±0.01^e	6.11±0.48^a	3.289±0.41^h	2.831±0.78^g	1 217.436±7.62^c	5.896±0.31^e
YZ01	11.8±0.17^c	2.47±0.49^d	2.08±0.53^d	0.818±0.02^e	92.63±4.6ⁱ	1.19±0.02^c	5.67±0.35^b	8.048±0.36^ef	4.382±0.38^e	1 178.537±6.47^d	6.467±0.34^d
BW01	14.8±0.23^a	0.86±0.35^h	3.08±0.44^bc	2.021±0.07^b	112.01±5.1^h	0.28±0.01^h	4.81±0.52^c	12.737±0.55^b	10.651±0.77^a	2 406.918±8.71^a	5.567±0.22^f
AH01	14.9±0.17^a	1.60±0.61^e	3.43±0.58^ab	0.646±0.06ⁱ	229.28±2.8^e	0.47±0.03^g	4.34±0.35^e	12.086±0.63^c	9.260±0.46^b	1 387.188±6.54^b	5.690±0.13^ef
AB01	12.2±0.31^bc	3.44±0.41^b	2.66±0.47^c	0.679±0.05^g	564.81±6.2^b	1.29±0.04^b	4.59±0.41^d	8.324±0.47^e	5.021±0.29^d	1 152.193±8.31^d	6.384±0.22^d
AB02	11.9±0.12^c	3.14±0.63^c	3.48±0.41^ab	0.858±0.03^e	388.56±3.1^c	0.90±0.03^d	3.42±0.33^g	3.885±0.31^g	2.359±0.66^g	595.286±2.98^e	12.619±0.63^a
AJ01	12.9±0.15^bc	3.31±0.75^bc	3.61±0.35^a	1.163±0.01^c	158.14±3.9^g	0.92±0.01^d	3.57±0.23^g	13.945±0.85^a	10.924±0.63^a	1 360.728±5.93^b	8.025±0.41^b
AQ01	13.2±0.24^b	4.26±0.18^a	2.65±0.61^c	0.763±0.04^f	773.32±4.4^a	1.61±0.06^a	4.98±0.61^c	3.969±0.42^g	9.378±0.65^b	1 164.815±3.65^d	4.641±0.33^h

Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources

11份野生沙棘种质资源果实品质分析与综合评价

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 22

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

主成分 Principal components	特征值 Eigenvalus	贡献率 Contribution rates(%)	累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rates(%)
1	3.816	34.687	34.687
2	2.887	26.242	60.929
3	2.351	25.369	86.298
4	0.912	4.287	90.585
5	0.415	3.769	94.354
6	0.369	3.354	97.708
7	0.179	1.632	99.340
8	0.063	0.574	99.914
9	0.009	0.085	99.998
10	0	0.002	100.000
11	6.18E-16	5.62E-15	100.000

品质及活性成分指标 Quality and active ingredients	主成分 Principle components
品质及活性成分指标 Quality and active ingredients	1	2	3
可溶性固形物Soluble solids	0.473	-0.397	0.275
总糖Total sugar	0.645	0.684	-0.225
总酸Total acid	0.566	-0.474	-0.455
蛋白质Protein	0.502	-0.132	0.592
抗坏血酸A scorbic acid	0.655	0.598	-0.185
糖酸比Sugar acid ratio	0.544	0.797	0.064
固酸比Solid acid tatio	0.382	0.173	0.811
黄酮Flavone	0.620	-0.564	-0.218
多酚Polyphenol	0.786	-0.352	-0.127
SOD酶活力SOD acitvity	0.804	-0.289	0.276
VE	0.517	0.094	-0.454

名称 Name	主成分得分 Principal component score			综合得分 Compre hensive core	排序 Ranking
名称 Name	1	2	3	综合得分 Compre hensive core	排序 Ranking
YC01	-0.528	-1.127	-1.881	-1.071	11
YN01	-1.737	1.129	0.736	-0.180	7
YG01	-1.643	-0.635	-0.594	-1.049	10
YT01	-0.309	1.190	-1.948	-0.257	8
YZ01	-0.677	0.862	1.025	0.257	4
BW01	1.633	-3.137	1.616	0.107	5
AH01	0.538	-1.989	-0.272	-0.479	9
AB01	0.516	1.606	-0.306	0.650	2
AB02	-1.092	0.654	2.649	0.437	3
AJ01	1.769	-1.107	-1.203	0.079	6
AQ01	1.530	2.553	0.179	1.505	1

[1]	JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110.
[2]	ZHU Xiaofeng, XU Bingqiang, Abudukeyoumu Kadeer, LI Haiqiang, SONG Bo, CHEN Haoyu, HAO Jingzhe. The occurrence and control status of fruit tree diseases and insect pests in Xinjiang: A case study of jujube [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 116-121.
[3]	WANG Xiang, DAI Junsheng. Analysis and driving factors of structure layout of forest and fruit industry in Tarim River Basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 227-231.
[4]	LIU Jing, DU Mingchuan, ZHANG Wenting, BAO Haijuan, JING Meiling, DU Wenhua. Screening of triticale germplasm in different areas of Qinghai [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2183-2190.
[5]	TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202.
[6]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[7]	LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
[8]	XU Jinzong, BAO Jianping. Effects of different irrigation amounts on storage quality of Korla fragrant pear fruit under irrigation mode [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1696-1709.
[9]	ZHANG Fulin, LI Ning, LIU Yuxiang, CHEN Yijia, YU Qinghui, YAN Huizhuan. Effects of exogenous 2,4-Epibrassinolide and melatonin on fruit quality and peel morphology of cherry tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1738-1747.
[10]	Yasen Tuerdi, MA Tianyu, Tuerdimaimaiti Nuermaimaiti, Adili Shataer. Study on the using pattern of Cydia pomonella L. and Grapholitha molesta Busck Sex Pheromone in walnut orchard [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1757-1765.
[11]	YE Pingyi, LONG Yilei, TANG Yanping, DU Xiao, AN Mengjie, TAO Zhixin, LIANG Farui, AI Xiantao, HU Shoulin. Identification and evaluation of fruit branch angle and machine-picked agronomic traits in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1318-1327.
[12]	Abudukadier Kurban, PAN Jinghai, CHEN Youqiang, LIU Huajun, DONG Xinjiu, BAI Xiaoshan, LI Sizhong, GAO Weishi, LI Xiaohui. Comprehensive evaluation of adaptability of late sowing sugar-beet varieties based on yield correlation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1368-1377.
[13]	YANG Junyan, YAN Miao, WU Haibo, YANG Wenli, WANG Haojie, MAO Jiancai, ZHAI Wenqiang, LI Junhua. The impact of high temperature on different thick -skinned melon varieties and comprehensive evaluation of its heat resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1386-1396.
[14]	HUANG Jinyue, XU Min, WANG Longfei, LIU Xinyi, GUO Yuqing, WU Xiaolan, WANG Yatong, ZHANG Shikui, FAN Guoquan. Changes of pectin components and enzyme activities during the development of apricot fruits [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1407-1415.
[15]	Tuerxun Ahemaiti, LIU Xukun, ZHAO Wenhui, ZHU Xiaofeng, Aerziguli Rouzi, Palidamu Tayier, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, JIA Zunzun, Adili Shataer, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of the effect of 10 new insecticides on the control of (Carposinasasakii Matsmura) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1447-1453.