Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.024

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality in the production of processing tomatoes in Xinjiang. 【Methods】 To investigate the application effect of microbial agent "Junlintianxia".The tomatoes were subjected to different doses of microbials agent at the seedling, early flowering, and fruiting stages through root dipping and drip irrigation. 【Results】 The application of microbial agent significantly enhanced the growth potential, stress tolerance, and yield of processing tomatoes. The field investigation demonstrated that the application of microbial agent treatment resulted in a significant increase in crop yield by 9.3% and economic benefits by RMB 440.7/667m², when compared to conventional management practices. Additionally, there was a reduction of 12.7% and 13.7% in fertilizer and pesticide usage respectively. 【Conclusion】 The application of microbial agent "Junlintianxia" in processing tomato fields can effectively enhance the quality and yield of tomatoes, thereby significantly augmenting the economic benefits associated with processing tomatoes.

Key words: microbial agent; processed tomatoes; fruit quality; fruit yield; application effect

摘要：

【目的】研究不同剂量的微生物菌剂对新疆加工番茄产量及品质的影响。【方法】选用微生物菌剂“菌临天下”采取蘸根和滴灌的方式分别对加工番茄幼苗期、初花期和盛果期施用不同剂量微生物菌剂。【结果】微生物菌剂显著增加了加工番茄的生长势、果实耐压力和果实产量。微生物菌剂处理较常规管理产量增加9.3%,经济效益增收440.7元/667m²,同时化肥和农药使用量分别减少12.7%和13.7%。【结论】加工番茄田间施用微生物菌剂“菌临天下”可以有效提高番茄的品质和产量,并显著提高加工番茄的经济效益。

关键词: 微生物菌剂, 加工番茄, 果实品质, 果实产量, 应用效果

CLC Number:

S641.2

CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.

陈芳, 李字辉, 孙孝贵, 张庭军. 不同剂量的微生物菌剂对加工番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.

Figures/Tables 4

Fig.1 Comparative analysis of agronomic traits in tomato plants between the control and treated groups Note: *,**, and *** indicate statistically significant differences at the 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 significance levels respectively

Fig.2 Comparative analysis of tomato quality indices between the control and treatment groups Note: ** in the figure indicates statistically significant differences at the 0.01 level

Tab.1 Yield and efficiency of processed tomatoes

项目 Items	单产 (kg/667m²)	肥料成本 (不含菌剂) (元/667m²)	农药成本 (元/667m²)
对照 Compare	10 240	389.5	82.7
处理 Treatments	10 650	340	71.7
增减百分率 Increase/decrease percentage	3.93	-12.7	-13.7

Fig.3 Comparison of crop yields between fields treated with microbial applications and those without such treatments Note: * in the figure represents significant differences at the 0.05 level

References 21

[1]	李永程, 李扬, 孙延明, 等. 山东省番茄种植现状、存在问题及对策[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2023, (7): 1-5.
	LI Yongcheng, LI Yang, SUN Yanming, et al. Status quo, problems and countermeasures of tomato planting in Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2023,(7): 1-5.
[2]	孙永珍, 贺靖, 魏芳, 等. "十三五"我国番茄产业发展及其国际竞争力评价[J]. 中国瓜菜, 2023, 36(1): 112-116.
	SUN Yongzhen, HE Jing, WEI Fang, et al. Evaluation on the development and international competitiveness of China's tomato industry during the 13th Five-Year Plan period[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables, 2023, 36(1): 112-116.
[3]	敖立琴, 刘才国, 范旭东, 等. 浅谈生物菌肥在设施蔬菜上的应用[J]. 现代农业, 2020, (2): 62-63.
	AO Liqin, LIU Caiguo, FAN Xudong, et al. Discussion on the application of biological bacterial fertilizer in protected vegetables[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2020, (2): 62-63.
[4]	宋琪, 周杨, 朱红惠, 等. 微生物肥料研究领域发展现状与趋势[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2023, 29(3): 783-92.
	SUN Qi, ZHOU Yang, ZHUN Honghui, et al Present situation and trends in the field of microbial fertilizer research[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2023, 29(3): 783-92.
[5]	陈翔兰. 生物菌肥的作用及推广应用前景[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2008, (4): 96.
	CHENG Xianglan. The role of biological bacterial fertilizer and the prospects for its popularization and application[J]. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2008,(4): 96.
[6]	李金鞠, 廖甜甜, 潘虹, 等. 土壤有益微生物在植物病害防治中的应用[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(23): 4753-4757.
	LI Jinju, LIAO Tiantian, PAN Hong, et al. Application of beneficial soil microorganisms in biological control of crop diseases[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 50(23): 4753-4757.
[7]	Li Q J, Zhang D Q, Cheng H Y, et al. Organic fertilizers activate soil enzyme activities and promote the recovery of soil beneficial microorganisms after dazomet fumigation[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 309: 114666.
[8]	张大琪, 任立瑞, 杜洪志, 等. 微生物菌剂处理增加了生姜土壤中有益微生物的相对丰度[J]. 植物保护, 2023, 49(4): 55-66.
	ZHANG Daqi, REN Lirui, DU Hongzhi, et al. Treatment with microbial agents increases the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the rhizosphere soil of ginger[J]. Plant Protection, 2023, 49(4): 55-66.
[9]	张蕾, 吴文强, 王维瑞, 等. 土壤调理剂及其配施微生物菌肥对设施菜田次生盐渍化土壤改良效果研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021, (3): 264-271.
	ZHANG Lei, WU Wenqiang, WANG Weirui, et al. Study on the effect of soil conditioner and combined application with microbial fertilizer on the improvement of secondary salinized soil in vegetable field[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021, (3): 264-271.
[10]	王丽丽, 朱诗君, 沈岚, 等. 微生物菌剂结合改良剂对连作草莓品质和土壤环境的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2023, 39(23): 39-44.
	WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, SHEN Lan, et al. Effects on fruit quality and soil environment of continuous cropping strawberry: microbial agents combined with soil conditioner[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2023, 39(23): 39-44.
[11]	余冬冬, 李永军. 不同微生物菌剂对草莓灰霉病的防治效果、植株生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2023, 64(10) : 2482-2486.
	YU Dongdong, LI Yongjun. Effects of different microbial agents on the control effect, plant growth and fruit quality of strawberry gray mold[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 64(10) : 2482-2486.
[12]	殷九泽. 长治市潞州区化肥减量增效现状及对策[J]. 中国果菜, 2023, 43(8): 80-84.
	YIN Jiuze. Current situation and countermeasures of fertilizer reduction and efficiency increase in Luzhou district, Changzhi city[J]. China Fruit & Vegetable, 2023, 43(8): 80-84.
[13]	温丹, 王晓, 孙凯宁, 等. 不同形态微生物菌剂对不结球白菜生长和品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(5): 1777-1782.
	WEN Dan, WANG Xiao, SUN Kaining, et al. Effects of different forms of microbial agents on the growth and quality of Brassica rapaL.ssp.chinensisMakino(non-heading Chinese cabbage)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(5): 1777-1782.
[14]	王丽丽, 朱诗君, 狄蕊, 等. 微生物菌肥菌剂对番茄生长发育和产量品质的影响[J]. 土壤与作物, 2022, 11(1): 88-95.
	WANG Lili, ZHU Shijun, DI Rui, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer and microbial agent on the growth, yield and quality of tomato[J]. Soils and Crops, 2022, 11(1): 88-95.
[15]	刘一江, 都林娜, 康华靖. 微生物菌剂对水稻植株性状、产量及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(6): 39-42.
	LUI Yijiang, DU Lina, KANG Huajing. Effects of Microbial Inoculants on Rice Growth and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties[J]. China Rice, 2019, 25(6): 39-42.
[16]	侯乐梅, 孟瑞青, 乜兰春, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对基质酶活性和番茄产量及品质的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(8): 2520-2526.
	HOU Lemei, MENG Ruiqing, NIE Lanchun, et al. Effects of different microbial agents on substrate enzyme activities and tomato yield and quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2016, 27(8): 2520-2526.
[17]	陈文东, 黄平, 王开金, 等. 复合微生物菌剂在昭通苹果化肥减量增效中的应用效果初探[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2023, 43(4): 57-60.
	CHEN Wendong, HUANG Ping, WANG Kaijin, et al. Preliminary study on the application effect of compound microbial agents in the reduction and increase of apple fertilizer in Zhaotong[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2023, 43(4): 57-60.
[18]	史伟杰, 张博超, 高华山, 等. 微生物菌剂对张家口坝上结球生菜生长的影响[J]. 蔬菜, 2020,(10): 23-26.
	SHI Weijie, ZHANG Bochao, GAO Huashan, et al. Effects of microbial agents on the head lettuce growth inr Bashang Region of Zhangjiakou[J]. Vegetables, 2020,(10): 23-26.
[19]	陈海玲, 黄强, 颜墩炜, 等. 化肥减施配施微生物菌剂对结球紫甘蓝产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 热带农业科学, 2023, 43(1): 5-9.
	CHENG Hailing, HUANG Qiang, YAN Dunwei, et al. Effects of Chemical Fertilizer Reduction Combined with Microbial AgentonYield, Quality, and Soil Fertility of Nodular Purple Cabbage[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2023, 43(1): 5-9.
[20]	曹恩珲, 侯宪文, 李光义, 等. 复合菌剂对盆栽番茄土壤理化性质及微生物活性的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2011, 20(5): 875-880.
	CAO En( Hui\|Hun), HOU Xianwen, LI Guangyi, et al. Effect of combination bacteria on soil physicochemical properties and soil microbial activity by pot tomato experiments[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2011, 20(5): 875-880.
[21]	杨楠, 谭雪莲, 郭天文, 等. 施加微生物菌剂对马铃薯根际土壤细菌多样性的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2023, 32(5): 781-790.
	YANG Nan, TAN Xuelian, GUO Tianwen, et al. Effect of microbial agents on bacterial diversity in potato rhizosphere soil[J]. Acta AgriculturaeBoreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 781-790.