Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.022

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (11): 2790-2797.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.11.022

• Microbes · Horticultural Special Local Products·Agricultural Product Processing Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles

Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field

WU Lili¹^,²(), QIAN Tao³, CHEN Yan², Wumaierjiang Baikeli², LI Guangkuo¹, DING Ruifeng¹()

1. Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops on Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs /Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091, China
2. Bazhou Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Korla Xinjiang 841000, China
3. College of Agriculture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2023-03-05 Online:2023-11-20 Published:2023-12-07
Correspondence author: DING Ruifeng(1985-), male, from Xinjiang, Researcher, research direction is weed comprehensive prevention and control in farmland, (E-mail)drf022@163.com
Supported by:
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops on Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs "Weed Community Structure Analysis and Control Agents Selection in Cotton Field in Bayingolin Mongol Autonomous Prefecture"(KFJJ202103);"Research on Digestion Dynamic of Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin in Cotton Field Soil"(KFJJ202203)

二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺对棉田一年生杂草的防治效果

吴莉莉¹^,²(), 钱涛³, 陈艳², 吾买尔江·拜克力², 李广阔¹, 丁瑞丰¹()

1.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆巴音郭楞蒙古自治区州农业技术推广中心,新疆库尔勒 841000
3.新疆农业大学农学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

通讯作者: 丁瑞丰(1985-),男,新疆人,研究员,博士,研究方向为农田杂草综合防控,(E-mail)drf022@163.com
作者简介:吴莉莉(1985-),女,河南人,高级农艺师,硕士,研究方向为农田有害生物综合治理,(E-mail)749858551@qq.com
基金资助:
农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室开放基金“巴州棉田杂草群落结构分析及防治药剂筛选”(KFJJ202103);“二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺在棉田土壤的分布及消解动态研究”(KFJJ202203)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To evaluate the control effect of pendimethalin EC, flumioxazin WP and their mixture to annual weeds and safety to cotton in the hope of providing scientific reference for chemical control to weeds in cotton field. 【Methods】 Plant control effect, fresh effect of 30 days and 40 days to annual weeds and safety to cotton after herbicides application were studied.【Results】 The results showed that there were no difference of treatments on safety to cotton, and no significant difference on seedling emergence rate between each treatment and blank control. Plant control effects of 330 g/L pendimethalin EC(742.5 g/hm²)+50% flumioxazin WP(45 g/hm²)and 330 g/L pendimethalin EC(866.25 g/hm²)+50% flumioxazin WP(60 g/hm²)to annual weeds after 30 days were 96.52% and 97.91%, 95.86% and 96.48% after 45 days, fresh weight control effects were 92.89% and 94.44% after 45 days, respectively. The mixture of pendimethalin and flumioxazin had significant effect on annual gramineous and broad-leaved weeds in cotton fields. The plant and fresh weight control effects of 330 g/L pendimethalin EC 866.25-990 g/hm² to annual gramineous weeds were between 83.58% to 90.23%, and the effects of 50% flumioxazin WP 60-75 g/hm² were between 84.58% to 90.98%, no significant difference between them. The plant and fresh weight control effects of 330 g/L pendimethalin EC 866.25-990 g/hm² to annual broad-leaved weeds were between 82.62% to 88.90%, and the effects of 50% flumioxazin WP 60-75 g/hm² were between 85.06%to 92.21%. 【Conclusion】 The plant and fresh weight control effect of flumioxazin to annual broad-leaf weeds are higher than that of pendimethalin, which can be applied selectively according to difference dominant weeds population for reasonable controling weeds in cotton field.

Key words: cotton; annual weeds; pendimethalin; flumioxazin; control effects

摘要：

【目的】 分析评价二甲戊灵乳油(EC)与丙炔氟草胺可湿性粉剂(WP)单剂及其混配后对棉田一年生杂草的安全性和防治效果,为棉田杂草的化学防治提供科学依据。【方法】 研究不同处理对棉田一年生杂草药后30 d株防效,45 d的株防效和鲜重防效,分析各处理药剂对棉花出苗的安全性。【结果】 供试药剂对棉花出苗无影响,各处理出苗率与空白对照相比无显著性差异。330 g/L二甲戊灵EC(742.5 g/hm²)+50%丙炔氟草胺WP(45 g/hm²)和330 g/L二甲戊灵EC(866.25 g/hm²)+50%丙炔氟草胺WP(60 g/hm²)对棉田一年生杂草30 d株防效分别为96.52%和97.91%,45 d株防效分别为95.86%和96.48%,45 d鲜重防效分别为92.89%和94.44%,2种药剂混配后对棉田一年生禾本科、阔叶杂草均有较好的防治效果。330 g/L二甲戊灵EC 866.25~990 g/hm²对棉田一年生禾本科杂草株防效和鲜重防效在83.58%~90.23%,50%丙炔氟草胺WP 60~75 g/hm²的处理为84.58%~90.98%,二者差异不显著,该剂量下二甲戊灵对棉田一年生阔叶杂草株防效和鲜重防效在82.62%~88.90%,丙炔氟草胺的处理防效为85.06%~92.21%。【结论】 丙炔氟草胺对棉田一年生阔叶杂草的株防效和鲜重防效优于二甲戊灵,可根据棉田优势杂草群落结构的差异选择不同的药剂施用,合理防治棉田杂草。

关键词: 棉花, 一年生杂草, 二甲戊灵, 丙炔氟草胺, 防治效果

CLC Number:

S451

WU Lili, QIAN Tao, CHEN Yan, Wumaierjiang Baikeli, LI Guangkuo, DING Ruifeng. Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797.

吴莉莉, 钱涛, 陈艳, 吾买尔江·拜克力, 李广阔, 丁瑞丰. 二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺对棉田一年生杂草的防治效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2790-2797.

Figures/Tables 6

References 23

[1]	国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M], 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2022.
	State Statistical Bureau. China Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2022.
[2]	李欢欢, 马小艳, 姜伟丽, 等. 棉田化学除草现状及对策[J], 中国棉花, 2019, 46(5):1-7,10.
	LI Huanhuan, MA Xiaoyan, JIANG Weili, et al. Current status and countermeasure of chemical weeding in cotton fields[J]. China Cotton, 2019, 46(5):1-7,10.
[3]	马小艳, 马艳, 彭军, 等. 我国棉田杂草研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 棉花学报, 2010, 22(4):372-380.
	MA Xiaoyan, MA Yan, PENG Jun, et al. Current situation and developing tendency of the weed researches in cotton field of China[J]. Cotton Sciences, 2010, 22(4):372-380.
[4]	郭文磊, 王兆振, 谭金妮, 等. 氟咯草酮与二甲戊灵或乙草胺复配的联合除草作用及其对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2016, 18(5):605-611.
	GUO Wenlei, WANG Zhaozhen, TAN Jinni, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of fluorochloridone combined with pendimethalin or acetochlor[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2016, 18(5):605-611.
[5]	王恒智, 谭金妮, 吕学深, 等. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵复配的联合除草作用及对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2018, 20(3):309-315.
	WANG Zhiheng, TAN Jinni, LYU Xueshen, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of the combination of flumioxazin and pendimethalin[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2018, 20(3):309-315.
[6]	Nalini K, Muthukrishnan P, Chinnusamy C. Evaluation of pendimethalin 38.7 EC on weed management in winter irrigated cotton[J]. Madras Agricultural Journal, 2011, 98(4-6):165-168. DOI URL
[7]	张学坤, 惠慧, 赵静, 等. 新疆棉田田旋花对二甲戊灵的耐药性测定[J]. 农药, 2017, 56(7):542-545.
	ZHANG Xuekun, HUI Hui, ZHAO Jing, et al. identification of field bindweed(Convolvulus arvensis L.) tolerance to pendimethalin in cotton field in Xin Jiang[J]. Agrochemicals, 2017, 56(7):542-545.
[8]	Shrestha A, Fidelibus M. Grapevine row orientation affects light environment, growth,and development of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum)[J]. Weed Science, 2005, 53: 802-812. DOI URL
[9]	姜辉, 王秀丽, 高明伟, 等. 抗草甘膦棉花高效简化栽培技术[J]. 中国棉花, 2017, 44(8):36-38.
	JIANG Hui, WANG Xiuli, GAO Mingwei, et al. The Efficient- and simplified-techniques for cultivation of Glyphosate-resistant cottons[J]. China Cotton, 2017, 44(8):36-38.
[10]	Jiang H L, Deng X X, Wang J G, et al. Effects of gibberellic acid and N, N-dimethyl piperidinium chloride on the dose of and physiological responses to prometryn in black nightshade (Solanum nigrum L.)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(4):e93654. DOI URL
[11]	梁友, 贾会娟, 董雪, 等. 4种土壤处理除草剂对龙葵的防除效果及安全性评价[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2014, 36(1):102-108.
	LIANG You, JIA Huijuan, DONG Xue, et al. The Effects of Four Soil-applied Herbicides on Control of Solanum nigrum L.and Safety Evaluation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2014, 36(1):102-108.
[12]	贾芳, 崔海兰, 李香菊, 等. 耐草甘膦杂草的研究现状[J]. 杂草学报, 2019, 37(1):1-9.
	JIA Fang, CUI Hailan, LI Xiangju, et al. The current status of Glyphosate-tolerant weeds[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2019, 37(1):1-9.
[13]	Beckie H J, Ashworth M B, Flower K C. Herbicide resistance management: recent developments and trends[J]. Plants, 2019, 8(6):161. DOI URL
[14]	黄华树. 丙炔氟草胺述评[J]. 农药, 2016, 55(10):778-780.
	HUANG Huashu. Introduction of flumioxazin[J]. Agrochemical, 2016, 55(10):778-780.
[15]	Kwon J, Armbrust K, Grey T. Hydrolysis and photolysis of flumioxazin in aqueous buffer solutions[J]. Pest Managment Science, 2004, 60:939-943.
[16]	GB/T 17980. 128-2004.农药田间药效试验准则(二)第128部分:除草剂防治棉花田杂草[S].
	GB/T 17980. 128-2004.Guidelines for field efficacy trials(Ⅱ)-Part 128: Herbicide against weeds in cotton[S].
[17]	Coakes S J. SPSS:Analysis without Anguish:version 20.0 for Windows[M]. John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
[18]	赵冰梅, 丁丽丽, 张强, 等. 42%氟啶草酮悬浮剂桶混二甲戊灵对覆膜棉田恶性杂草防除效果及安全性[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(2):33-36.
	ZHAO Bingmei, DING Lili, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of a Tank Mixture with Fluridone 42% SC plus Pendimethalin for Controlling Malignant Weeds in Mulched Cotton Field[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(2):33-36.
[19]	黄红娟, 张朝贤, 姜翠兰, 等. 北疆棉田杂草多样性及群落组成[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(1):7-13.
	HUANG Hongjuan, ZHANG Chaoxian, JIANG Cuilan, et al. Diversity and community composition of weeds in cotton fields of Northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(1):7-13.
[20]	谭金妮, 李琦, 郭文磊, 等. 丙炔氟草胺对除草活性及对棉花的安全性[J]. 农药学学报, 2017, 19(2):189-194.
	TAN Jinni, LI Qi, GUO Wenlei, et al. Evaluation of herbicidal activity and safety to cotton of flumioxazin[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2017, 19(2): 189-194.
[21]	赵娜娜, 冯佳楠, 王盼盼, 等. 34%丙炔氟草胺·二甲戊灵乳油对棉田阔叶杂草的防除效果[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(4):779-784. DOI
	ZHAO Nana, FENG Jianan, WANG Panpan, et al. Field Efficacy of 34% flumioxazin·pendimethalin EC on Broadleaved Weeds in Cotton Field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(4):779-784. DOI
[22]	辛志梅, 刘甲魁. 50%丙炔氟草胺(速收)防除花生田杂草试验[J]. 山东农业科学, 2007,(6): 79-80.
	XIN Zhimei, LIU Jiakui. Test of 50% flumioxaxin on controlling weeds in groundnut fields[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(6):79-80.
[23]	赵冰梅, 朱玉永, 王林. 丙炔氟草胺与二甲戊灵混配使用对棉田杂草的防除效果及棉花安全性研究[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(3):250-255.
	ZHAO Bingmei, ZHU Yuyong, WANG Lin. Control effect of mixed used of flumioxazin and pendimethalin on weeds in cotton fields and safety to cotton[J]. Plant Protection, 2021, 47(3):250-255.

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicides	制剂用药量 Dosage of formulation (g·mL/ 667m²)	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm²)
1	330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC	150	742.5
2		175	866.25
3		200	990
4		350	1 732.5
5	50%丙炔氟草胺WP	6	45
6		8	60
7		10	75
8		16	120
9	330 g/mL二甲戊灵 EC+50%丙炔氟草胺WP	150+6	742.5+45
10	330 g/mL二甲戊灵 EC+50%丙炔氟草胺WP	175+8	866.25+60
11	人工除草	-	-
12	空白对照	-	-

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicides	制剂用药量 Dosage of formulation (g·mL/ 667m²)	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm²)
1	330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC	150	742.5
2		175	866.25
3		200	990
4		350	1 732.5
5	50%丙炔氟草胺WP	6	45
6		8	60
7		10	75
8		16	120
9	330 g/mL二甲戊灵 EC+50%丙炔氟草胺WP	150+6	742.5+45
10	330 g/mL二甲戊灵 EC+50%丙炔氟草胺WP	175+8	866.25+60
11	人工除草	-	-
12	空白对照	-	-

Ⅳ-3	Ⅳ-4	Ⅳ-6	Ⅳ-5	Ⅳ-7	Ⅳ-1	Ⅳ-12	Ⅳ-9	Ⅳ-11	Ⅳ-2	Ⅳ-8	Ⅳ-10
Ⅲ-11	Ⅲ-10	Ⅲ-1	Ⅲ-9	Ⅲ-12	Ⅲ-8	Ⅲ-3	Ⅲ-5	Ⅲ-7	Ⅲ-4	Ⅲ-2	Ⅲ-6
Ⅱ-4	Ⅱ-12	Ⅱ-7	Ⅱ-11	Ⅱ-8	Ⅱ-10	Ⅱ-5	Ⅱ-2	Ⅱ-6	Ⅱ-3	Ⅱ-1	Ⅱ-9
Ⅰ-2	Ⅰ-6	Ⅰ-12	Ⅰ-1	Ⅰ-5	Ⅰ-11	Ⅰ-8	Ⅰ-7	Ⅰ-9	Ⅰ-10	Ⅰ-4	Ⅰ-3

Ⅳ-3	Ⅳ-4	Ⅳ-6	Ⅳ-5	Ⅳ-7	Ⅳ-1	Ⅳ-12	Ⅳ-9	Ⅳ-11	Ⅳ-2	Ⅳ-8	Ⅳ-10
Ⅲ-11	Ⅲ-10	Ⅲ-1	Ⅲ-9	Ⅲ-12	Ⅲ-8	Ⅲ-3	Ⅲ-5	Ⅲ-7	Ⅲ-4	Ⅲ-2	Ⅲ-6
Ⅱ-4	Ⅱ-12	Ⅱ-7	Ⅱ-11	Ⅱ-8	Ⅱ-10	Ⅱ-5	Ⅱ-2	Ⅱ-6	Ⅱ-3	Ⅱ-1	Ⅱ-9
Ⅰ-2	Ⅰ-6	Ⅰ-12	Ⅰ-1	Ⅰ-5	Ⅰ-11	Ⅰ-8	Ⅰ-7	Ⅰ-9	Ⅰ-10	Ⅰ-4	Ⅰ-3

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂 Herbicides	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm²)	出苗率 Rate of emergence (%)
1	330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC	742.5	76.67±2.08^a
2		866.25	81.11±1.20^a
3		990	78.89±5.31^a
4		1 732.5	83.89±3.59^a
5	50%丙炔氟草胺WP	45	81.94±2.77^a
6		60	81.39±4.17^a
7		75	78.33±0.72^a
8		120	80.22±4.38^a
9	330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC+50% 丙炔氟草胺WP	742.5+45	80.28±2.42^a
10	330 g/mL 二甲戊灵EC+50% 丙炔氟草胺WP	866.25+60	80.00±3.19^a
11	人工除草	-	81.39±2.66^a
12	空白对照	-	78.89±2.94^a

Control effects of pendimethalin and flumioxazin to annual weeds in cotton field

二甲戊灵和丙炔氟草胺对棉田一年生杂草的防治效果

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

处理 Treatments	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm²)	药后30 d株防效 30 days after application	药后45 d株防效 45 days after application	药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application
1	742.5	83.46±2.87^cd	82.59±1.95^fg	81.77%±0.41^d
2	866.25	85.71±3.75^c	83.58±2.51^f	85.09%±1.03^c
3	990	90.23±4.71^b	89.55±1.25^e	88.20%±0.57^b
4	1 732.5	96.24±3.13^a	92.54±2.88^cd	91.41%±1.17^a
5	45	81.95±3.26^d	80.60±4.21^g	81.21%±2.48^d
6	60	84.96±1.23^c	84.58±1.71^f	85.67%±1.52^bc
7	75	90.98±3.27^b	90.55±2.95^de	88.17%±2.83^b
8	120	95.49±2.53^a	94.03±4.84^bc	91.56%±1.37^a
9	742.5+45	96.24±1.63^a	96.02±1.58^ab	92.41±1.03^a
10	866.25+60	96.99±0.75^a	97.01±1.90^a	94.29±1.05^a
11	-	94.74±3.44^a	94.53±4.25^abc	91.48%±1.95^a

处理 Treatments	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm²)	药后30 d株防效 30 days after application	药后45 d株防效 45 days after application	药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application
1	742.5	80.52±4.28^e	80.14±5.21^e	80.21±2.12^f
2	866.25	83.12±3.95^de	82.62±2.77^de	84.49±1.74^de
3	990	85.06±3.65^d	84.75±1.34^d	88.90±2.36^c
4	1 732.5	91.56±3.27^c	90.43±2.80^c	90.58±2.49^bc
5	45	83.77±3.65^de	83.33±1.53^de	82.96±2.46^e
6	60	85.06±1.06^d	85.82±3.42^d	86.14±1.17^d
7	75	92.21±1.30^c	91.13±3.58^bc	90.66±2.28^bc
8	120	96.10±1.41^ab	94.33±3.27^ab	92.84±4.26^ab
9	742.5+45	96.75±1.09^a	95.74±2.04^a	93.52±3.29^a
10	866.25+60	98.70±1.25^a	96.10±1.74^a	94.65±1.92^a
11	-	92.86±2.88^bc	94.33%±4.25^ab	90.22±3.56^c

处理 Treatments	有效成分用量 Dosage of active ingredient (g/hm²)	药后30 d株防效 30 days after application (%)	药后45 d株防效 45 days after application (%)	药后45 d鲜重防效 Fresh weight control effect of 45 days after application (%)
1	742.5	81.88±2.80^f	81.16±3.41^e	80.59±1.22^f
2	866.25	84.32±2.35^e	83.02±3.53^de	84.82±1.56^e
3	990	87.46±3.37^d	86.75±4.76^c	88.50±2.55^d
4	1 732.5	93.73±3.61^bc	91.30±1.04^b	91.04±1.25^bc
5	45	82.93±1.75^ef	82.19±2.84^e	81.97±1.25^f
6	60	85.02±2.88^e	85.30±2.24^cd	85.88±2.26^e
7	75	91.64±3.23^c	90.89±4.33^b	89.26±3.27^cd
8	120	95.82±3.74^ab	94.20±3.26^a	92.84±1.85^b
9	742.5+45	96.52±2.9^a	95.86±3.04^a	92.89±1.83^ab
10	866.25+60	97.91±1.7^a	96.48±2.75^a	94.44±2.69^a
11	-	93.73±2.96^bc	94.41±2.75^a	90.93±1.06^bc

[1]	ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141.
[2]	MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226.
[3]	DAI Aimei, YE Mengdi, DING Zhimei, WANG Zhihui, QIAO Xiaoyan, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, YE Xiaoqin, Tuerxun Ahemati, KANG Jian, DING Xinhua, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation on the efficacy and safety of dif ferent application methods of flumioxazinone in controlling weeds in corn field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 28-34.
[4]	WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69.
[5]	ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74.
[6]	LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94.
[7]	BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100.
[8]	LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102.
[9]	ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[10]	CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[11]	HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[12]	WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[13]	ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[14]	DONG Zhiduo, XU Fei, FU Qiuping, HUANG Jian, QI Tong, MENG Ajing, FU Yanbo, Kaisaier Kuerban. Effects of different types of salt and alkali stress on cotton seed germination [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1831-1844.
[15]	LI Ying, GUO Wenwen, LI Jiangbo, QU Yanying, CHEN Quanjia, ZHENG Kai. Evaluation of adaptability of 90 BT transgenic insectresistant cotton varieties (lines) in early cotton areas of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1561-1573.