Evaluation on the efficacy and safety of dif ferent application methods of flumioxazinone in controlling weeds in corn field

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.S1.004

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (S1): 28-34.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.S1.004

• The special clumn for research of pest control in corn field • Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluation on the efficacy and safety of dif ferent application methods of flumioxazinone in controlling weeds in corn field

DAI Aimei¹^,²(), YE Mengdi³, DING Zhimei², WANG Zhihui⁴, QIAO Xiaoyan¹, WANG Xiaowu¹, FU Kaiyun¹, JIA Zunzun¹, YE Xiaoqin¹, Tuerxun Ahemati¹, KANG Jian⁵, DING Xinhua¹(), GUO Wenchao¹()

1. Institute of Plant Protection, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management on Crops in Northwestern Oasis, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Agricultural Bio-safety,Urumqi 830091,China
2. Bortala Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture Agricultural Technology Extension Center,Bole Xinjiang 833400,China
3. Plant Protection of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region,Urumqi 830049,China
4. Institute of Microbial Application,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Environmental Microbiology, Urumqi 830091, China
5. Xinjiang Xinlong Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd,Urumqi 830006,China

Received:2024-07-05 Online:2024-10-10 Published:2024-11-15
Correspondence author: DING Xinhua, GUO Wenchao
Supported by:
Xinjiang Major Science and Technology projects“Research, development, and demonstration of key technologies for the green control of major pests on special and superiority crops in Xinjiang”(2023A02009)

不同苯唑氟草酮施药方式防除玉米田杂草药效及安全性评价

戴爱梅¹^,²(), 叶梦迪³, 丁志梅², 王志慧⁴, 乔晓燕¹, 王小武¹, 付开赟¹, 贾尊尊¹, 叶晓琴¹, 吐尔逊·阿合买提¹, 康健⁵, 丁新华¹(), 郭文超¹()

1.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室/新疆农业生物安全重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.博尔塔拉蒙古自治州农业技术推广中心,新疆博乐 833400
3.新疆维吾尔自治区植物保护站,乌鲁木齐 830049
4.新疆农业科学院微生物应用研究所/新疆特殊环境微生物实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
5.新疆鑫隆农业科技有限公司,乌鲁木齐 830006

通讯作者: 丁新华,郭文超
作者简介:戴爱梅(1974-),女,广西人,推广研究员,研究方向为农业有害生物综合防治,(E-mail)7628378@163.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区重大科技专项“新疆优势特色农作物重大有害生物绿色防控关键技术研发”(2023A02009)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 In order to establish a safe and efficient herbicide application method in line with the current large-scale intensive planting background, the efficacy test and safety evaluation of fenoxaprop-P-ethyl with different application methods to control weeds in corn fields were carried out.【Methods】 Drip irrigation and plant protection UAV spraying were used to compare and analyze the actual control effect of water dripping and plant protection UAV ultra-low spraying herbicides on weeds in corn fields in Xinjiang irrigation area.【Results】 Compared with drip irrigation, spraying 6 % flumioxazinone OD 125 mL + 90 % atrazine 62.5 mL by drone had better control effect on Chenopodium glaucum, Abutilon theophrasti, Convolvulus arvense and Echinochloa crusgalli on the 5th, 10th and 15th day after treatment, but there was no significant difference on the 30 th day.The study also found that the application of herbicides under mulched drip irrigation was significantly better than that without mulched drip irrigation, and the plant control effect and fresh weight control effect of the application of herbicides under mulched drip irrigation were 98.48 %-100 % and 99.28 %-100 %, respectively, after 30 days of treatment.The plant control effect and fresh weight control effect were only 71.60 % and 74.28 %, respectively, after 30 days of treatment of Convolvulus arvensis.In addition, different application methods did not produce obvious phytotoxicity symptoms on maize, and the yield of maize was significantly improved.【Conclusion】 Drip application of flumioxazinone herbicide can be applied to control a variety of weeds in irrigated maize production areas in Xinjiang.

Key words: flumioxazinone; corn; efficacy; security; UAV; drip application

摘要：

【目的】不同设置苯唑氟草酮施药方式防除玉米田间杂草的药效试验,并进行安全性评价,筛选符合当前大面积集约化种植的高效除草剂安全施药方法。【方法】采用滴灌施药及植保无人机喷施的方式,对比分析随水滴施和植保无人机超低量喷施除草剂对新疆灌区玉米田杂草的实际防除效果。【结果】相较于滴灌滴施,利用无人机喷施6%苯唑氟草酮可分散油悬浮剂(OD) 125 mL+90%莠去津62.5 mL在药后第5、10和15 d对灰藜、苘麻、田旋花及稗草的防效更优,施药30d时两者间无显著差异。膜下滴灌滴施除草剂显著优于无膜滴灌滴施处理,且膜下滴灌施药对灰黎、苘麻和稗草药后30 d的株防效和鲜重防效依次为98.48%~100%和99.28%~100%,对田旋花药后30 d的株防效和鲜重防效分别仅为71.60%和74.28%。此外,不同施药方式均未对玉米产生明显的药害症状,且对玉米产量有显著提升。【结论】滴施苯唑氟草酮除草剂可应用于新疆灌溉玉米产区防治多种杂草。

关键词: 苯唑氟草酮, 玉米, 药效, 安全性, 无人机, 滴施

CLC Number:

S435.131.4

DAI Aimei, YE Mengdi, DING Zhimei, WANG Zhihui, QIAO Xiaoyan, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, YE Xiaoqin, Tuerxun Ahemati, KANG Jian, DING Xinhua, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation on the efficacy and safety of dif ferent application methods of flumioxazinone in controlling weeds in corn field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 28-34.

戴爱梅, 叶梦迪, 丁志梅, 王志慧, 乔晓燕, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 叶晓琴, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 康健, 丁新华, 郭文超. 不同苯唑氟草酮施药方式防除玉米田杂草药效及安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 28-34.

Figures/Tables 3

References 15

[1]	邱军, 王术坤, 景琦, 等. 中国玉米种子供需形势分析与未来展望[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2023, 31 (6): 163-168.
	QU Jun, WANG Shukung, JING Qi, et al. Analysis and Future Prospect of Supply and Demand of Chinese Corn Seeds[J]. Science and Technology of Cereals,Oils and Foods, 2023, 31 (6): 163-168.
[2]	刘长全, 韩磊, 李婷婷, 等. 大食物观下中国饲料粮供给安全问题研究[J]. 中国农村经济, 2023(1):33-57.
	LIU Changquan, HAN Lie, LI Tingting, et al. Roles of Fusarium Toxins in Plant-pathogen Interaction[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2023,(1):33-57.
[3]	白文斌, 张建华, 高振峰, 等. 不同施肥与耕作方式对高粱-玉米轮作田杂草多样性影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2024, 33(11).
	BAI Wenbing, ZHAGN Jianhua, GAO Zhenfeng, et al. Effects of Different Fertilization and Tillage Methodson Weed Diversityin Sorghum-maize Rotation Fileds[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2024, 33(11).
[4]	丁新华, 王小武, 蒋旭东, 等. 2种增效剂对春玉米田除草剂的减量增效作用[J]. 植物保护, 2022, 48 (1): 297-304.
	DING Xinhua, WANG Xiaowu, JIANG Xudong, et al. Decrement and Synergistic Effect of two Synergist on Herbicides in Spring Corn Field[J]. Plant Protection, 2022, 48 (1): 297-304.
[5]	钟秋瓒, 申昌优, 肖先仪, 等. 3种除草剂对水稻产量·杂草防除及后茬作物安全性的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2016, 44(11):173-175.
	ZHONG Qiuzan, SHEN Changyou, XlAO Xianyi, et al. Effects of Three Tested Herbicides on the Yield of Paddy Rice,Weed Control and Safety of succeeding Crops[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(11):173-175.
[6]	王钢. 玉米田除草剂漂移对烟草的影响研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2019.
	WANG Gang. Study on the Effects of Corn Herbicides Drift on Tobacco[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Dissertation, 2019.
[7]	李建国. 农田除草剂漂移对古银杏树的危害初探[J]. 现代园艺, 2016, (13): 150-151.
	LI Jianguo. Preliminary Study on the Harm of Herbicide Drift in Farmland to Ancient Ginkgo Trees[J]. Contemporary Horticulture, 2016,(13): 150-151.
[8]	李双建, 王小武, 王志慧, 等. 春播玉米田杂草化学防除药效筛选及其安全性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56 (3): 551-559. DOI
	LI ShuangJian, WANG Xiaowu, WANG Zhihui, et al. Screening and Safety Evaluation of chemical Control of Weeds in Spring Sowing Corn Fields in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56 (3): 551-559. DOI
[9]	陈祥, 陈卫民, 梁巧玲, 等. 新疆伊犁河谷玉米田杂草发生现状及防除对策[J]. 杂草科学, 2010, (2): 36-38.
	CHEN Xiang, CHEN Weimin, LIANG Qiaoling, et al. Occurrence Status and Control Countermeasures of Weeds in Maize Field of Yili River Valley in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2010,(2): 36-38.
[10]	雷勇刚. 96% 金都尔乳油随水滴灌施药防治棉田杂草试验效果探讨[J]. 农民致富之友, 2015,(4): 145.
	LIE Yonggang. Study on the Effect of 96 % Jinduer EC with Drip Irrigation to Control Weeds in Cotton Field[J]. Friends of Farmers Getting Rich, 2015,(4): 145.
[11]	程功, 魏义长, 王维超, 等. 除草剂随滴灌水施用的除草效果及对烟草生长的影响[J]. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45 (4): 85-90.
	CHENG Gong, WEl Yichang, WANG Weichao, et al. Effects of Herbicides Applied with Drip lrrigation Water on Weeds and Tobacco Growth[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 45 (4): 85-90.
[12]	李敏华, 董永义, 庄得凤, 等. 苗前除草剂对浅埋滴灌玉米田杂草的防除效果[J]. 农药, 2022, 61 (5): 386-390.
	LI Minhua, DONG Yongyi, ZHUANG Defeng, et al. Control Effects of Pre-emergence Herbicide on Weeds in Corn Fields Under Shallow Drip Irrigation[J]. Agrochemicals, 2022, 61 (5): 386-390.
[13]	史才德. 膜下滴灌技术推广与应用[J]. 农业机械. 2018, (9):87-89
	SHI Caide. Promotion and Application of Drip Irrigation Technology Under Film[J]. Farm Machinery, 2018,(9):87-89.
[14]	郭致杰, 张海英, 李建军, 等. 基于玉米膜下滴灌系统的药液扩散与除草效果研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2023, 60 (4): 1183-1191.
	GUO Zhijie, ZHANG Haiying, Ll Jianjun, et al. Medicinal Liguid Diffusion and Weed Control Effect Based on Drip lrrigation System Under Maize Film[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2023, 60 (4): 1183-1191.
[15]	孙军仓, 燕鹏, 王敬昌, 等. 关中地区麦田杂草田旋花和打碗花的发生特点及防治对策[J]. 农技服务, 2020, 37 (4): 81-82.
	SUN Junchang, YAN Peng, WANG Jingchang, et al. Occurrence Characteristics and Control Measures of Convolvulus Australis and C.dahurica in wheat Field Weed Field in Guanzhong Area[J]. Agricultural Technology Service, 2020, 37 (4): 81-82.

杂草种类 Weed species	施药天数 Days of application (d)	处理3		处理4
杂草种类 Weed species	施药天数 Days of application (d)	株防效 Plant control (%)	鲜重防效 Fresh weight control(%)	株防效 Plant control (%)	鲜重防效 Fresh weight control(%)
灰藜 Chenopodium album L.	5	44.73±0.72^aA	36.30±0.88^aA	44.74±0.77^aA	34.49±0.98^aA
	10	65.78±0.65^aA	53.74±2.07^aA	69.61±0.44^aA	53.43±1.32^aA
	15	93.67±0.96^aA	94.59±1.45^aA	94.95±0.70^aA	95.21±0.24^aA
	30	100±0^aA	100±0^aA	100±0^aA	100±0^aA
苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti Medicus	5	29.11±0.49^bB	31.29±0.74^aA	31.98±1.33^aA	32.01±2.15^aA
	10	66.10±1.09^aAB	62.87±3.6^bA	68.85±0.66^aA	71.61±0.53^aA
	15	92.61±0.42^aA	92.93±0.25^bA	91.66±0.89^aA	94.63±0.16^aA
	30	99.45±0.55^aA	99.60±0.40^aA	99.11±0.44^aA	98.91±0.56^aA
稗草 Echinochloa crcsgalli(L.) Beauv.	5	23.90±0.75^aA	31.29±0.98^aA	21.43±1.34^abA	17.30±1.07^cBC
	10	51.52±1.03^aA	52.90±1.02^aA	46.71±3.02^abAB	44.53±1.12^bB
	15	92.66±1.2^aA	95.03 ±0.20^aA	81.90±0.67^bB	83.97± 2.74^bB
	30	99.29±0.36^aA	99.21±0.40^aA	93.76±0.47^bA	94.16±0.73^bB
田旋花 Convolvulus arensis L.	5	4.11±0.71^aA	4.45±1.01^aA	1.39±0.70^bA	1.39±0.70^bA
	10	24.17±0.18^abAB	23.15±0.27^bB	20.29±0.98^bcAB	20.29±0.98^cB
	15	59.19±1.11^bA	57.27±2.12^aA	50.04±0.60^bA	50.04±0.60^bB
	30	72.59±2.22 ^aA	67.82±1.25^bA	65.19±1.48^aA	58.00±3.52^cB

杂草种类 Weed species	施药天数 Days of application (d)	处理3		处理4
杂草种类 Weed species	施药天数 Days of application (d)	株防效 Plant control (%)	鲜重防效 Fresh weight control(%)	株防效 Plant control (%)	鲜重防效 Fresh weight control(%)
灰藜 Chenopodium album L.	5	44.73±0.72^aA	36.30±0.88^aA	44.74±0.77^aA	34.49±0.98^aA
	10	65.78±0.65^aA	53.74±2.07^aA	69.61±0.44^aA	53.43±1.32^aA
	15	93.67±0.96^aA	94.59±1.45^aA	94.95±0.70^aA	95.21±0.24^aA
	30	100±0^aA	100±0^aA	100±0^aA	100±0^aA
苘麻 Abutilon theophrasti Medicus	5	29.11±0.49^bB	31.29±0.74^aA	31.98±1.33^aA	32.01±2.15^aA
	10	66.10±1.09^aAB	62.87±3.6^bA	68.85±0.66^aA	71.61±0.53^aA
	15	92.61±0.42^aA	92.93±0.25^bA	91.66±0.89^aA	94.63±0.16^aA
	30	99.45±0.55^aA	99.60±0.40^aA	99.11±0.44^aA	98.91±0.56^aA
稗草 Echinochloa crcsgalli(L.) Beauv.	5	23.90±0.75^aA	31.29±0.98^aA	21.43±1.34^abA	17.30±1.07^cBC
	10	51.52±1.03^aA	52.90±1.02^aA	46.71±3.02^abAB	44.53±1.12^bB
	15	92.66±1.2^aA	95.03 ±0.20^aA	81.90±0.67^bB	83.97± 2.74^bB
	30	99.29±0.36^aA	99.21±0.40^aA	93.76±0.47^bA	94.16±0.73^bB
田旋花 Convolvulus arensis L.	5	4.11±0.71^aA	4.45±1.01^aA	1.39±0.70^bA	1.39±0.70^bA
	10	24.17±0.18^abAB	23.15±0.27^bB	20.29±0.98^bcAB	20.29±0.98^cB
	15	59.19±1.11^bA	57.27±2.12^aA	50.04±0.60^bA	50.04±0.60^bB
	30	72.59±2.22 ^aA	67.82±1.25^bA	65.19±1.48^aA	58.00±3.52^cB

处理 Treatments	药害 Crop injury	小区产量 Yield (kg/667m²)	增产率 Yield increase rate(%)
处理1 Treatment 1	无	116.37±0.43	5.40
处理2 Treatment 2	无	118.37±0.37	7.22
处理3 Treatment 3	无	116.87±0.27	5.86
处理4 Treatment 4	1	114.17±0.94	3.41
处理5 Treatment 5		110.40±1.04

处理 Treatments	药害 Crop injury	小区产量 Yield (kg/667m²)	增产率 Yield increase rate(%)
处理1 Treatment 1	无	116.37±0.43	5.40
处理2 Treatment 2	无	118.37±0.37	7.22
处理3 Treatment 3	无	116.87±0.27	5.86
处理4 Treatment 4	1	114.17±0.94	3.41
处理5 Treatment 5		110.40±1.04

Evaluation on the efficacy and safety of dif ferent application methods of flumioxazinone in controlling weeds in corn field

不同苯唑氟草酮施药方式防除玉米田杂草药效及安全性评价

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 15

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

[1]	ZHANG Shuai, GAO Guowen, WU Lili, ZHAO Haiyan, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, DING Xinhua, LI Kemei, GUO Wenchao. Evaluation of the synergistic application of seed coating agents, synergists, and micro fertilizers for the prevention and control of corn stem rot disease [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27.
[2]	YUAN Zihan, ZHAO Wenhui, WANG Xiaowu, Tuerxun Ahemaiti, DING Xinhua, ZHANG Shuai, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, GUO Wenchao. Screening of Corn Stalk Rot control bacteria and evaluation of control effects [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 35-48.
[3]	GONG Xuehua, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, TURSUN Ahmat, QIAO Xiaoyan, YE Xiaoqin, GUO Wenchao, DING Xinhua. Effects of weed seeds bank and environmental factors on weed seeds germination in oasis irrigation areas of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 49-59.
[4]	ZHANG Lei, SUN Shiren, XIE Xiaoqing, WANG Yejian, LI Dong, TANG Huaijun, LIU Cheng. Present situation of maize irrigation water and scientific water-saving irrigation strategy in Emin County [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 81-84.
[5]	YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, PENG Yuncheng, Dawulai Jiekeshan, FENG Guorui, TANG Shimin. Study on variation of grain nutritional quality of glutinous maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2087-2093.
[6]	YANG Caixia, GU Wei, GUAN Yuan, QU Jingtao, DANG Dongdong, WU Penghao, ZHENG Hongjian. Variation analysis of sweetness gene Sugary1 (Su1) sequence in Sweet corn [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1605-1614.
[7]	ZHONG Huili, WU Jun, LU Xiangsheng. Effects of different growth stage application combinations of amendments on secondary salinized soil properties and sweet corn yield in Hexi Corrido [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1615-1625.
[8]	ZHANG Zhenfei, GUO Jing, YAN An, HOU Zhengqing, YUAN Yilin, XIAO Shuting, SUN Zhe. Study on extraction of apple tree height at different flight altitudes using multispectral UAV [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1710-1716.
[9]	SHAO Yajie, LI Ke, DING Wenhao, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, WU Fengquan, WANG Xin, TANG Qiuxiang. Study on cotton biomass estimation based on multi-spectral imaging features of unmanned aerial vehicle [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1328-1335.
[10]	ZHANG Zhenfei, GUO Jing, YAN An, YUAN Yilin, XIAO Shuting, HOU Zhengqing, SUN Zhe. Study on extraction of apple tree crown width at different flight altitudes using multi-spectral UAV [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1468-1476.
[11]	LI Xuerui, ZHAI Menghua, XU Xinlong, SUN Minghui, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of spraying different concentrations of SAH by UAV on cotton growth and development [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1085-1093.
[12]	FU Hao, ZHANG Xuejun, SHI Zenglu, CHENG Jinpeng, WU Haifeng, YU Yongliang, RAO Zhiqiang. Design and experiment of corn precision no-till planter in drip irrigation area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1094-1101.
[13]	LIU Wanqin, YI Yuanyang, PENG Xiaowu, XIE Fang, GU Meiying, ZHANG Zhidong. Effect of cephalosporin residue organic fertilizer on resistant bacteria and related resistance genes in maize soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 1003-1010.
[14]	ZHU Tao, Lei Qingyuan, MA Liang. Effects of water and nitrogen on growth, yield and water and nitrogen utilization efficiency of resown Maize and verification of scheme optimization model [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 835-844.
[15]	FU Yanbo, BIAN Qingyong, WEI Yayuan, WEI Yanhong, ZHANG Wanxu, ZHU Jinquan. Effects of formula fertilizer on physiological growth and yield of drip irrigation maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 878-884.