Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (10): 2371-2379.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.10.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Xinxin(), ZHAO Qiang(
), WANG Wei, MA Chunmei, Alimu Amuli, ZHAN Dongxia, Munire Abduaini, LI Guangwei, TIAN Yangqing
Received:
2023-01-06
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-11-01
Correspondence author:
ZHAO Qiang(1981-), male, Han nationality,from Anhui Province, associate professor, doctor, research direction is principle and technology of crop chemical control,(E-mail)Supported by:
李欣欣(), 赵强(
), 王为, 马春梅, 阿里木·阿木力, 占东霞, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 李广维, 田阳青
通讯作者:
赵强(1981-),男,安徽人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为作物化控,(E-mail)作者简介:
李欣欣(1998-),女,安徽人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物化控,(E-mail)1901023664@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
LI Xinxin, ZHAO Qiang, WANG Wei, MA Chunmei, Alimu Amuli, ZHAN Dongxia, Munire Abduaini, LI Guangwei, TIAN Yangqing. Effects of 0.1% thiabenduron combined with different exogenous substances on growth, yield and quality of chemical topping cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2371-2379.
李欣欣, 赵强, 王为, 马春梅, 阿里木·阿木力, 占东霞, 穆妮热·阿卜杜艾尼, 李广维, 田阳青. 0.1%噻苯隆复配不同外源物质对化学打顶棉花生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2371-2379.
试验编号 Test number | 试验处理 Test processing | 噻苯隆 药剂剂量 Dosage (mL/hm2) | 外源物 质剂量 Dosage (mL/hm2 或g/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
TDZ1 | 0.1%噻苯隆+ 14-羟基芸苔素甾醇 | 150 | 150 |
TDZ2 | 0.1%噻苯隆+复硝酚钠 | 150 | 300 |
TDZ3 | 0.1%噻苯隆+胺鲜酯 | 150 | 150 |
TDZ4 | 0.1%噻苯隆+诱抗素 | 150 | 300 |
TDZ5 | 0.1%噻苯隆+乙烯利 | 150 | 300 |
CK | 清水 | / | / |
Tab.1 Test treatment number and dose
试验编号 Test number | 试验处理 Test processing | 噻苯隆 药剂剂量 Dosage (mL/hm2) | 外源物 质剂量 Dosage (mL/hm2 或g/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|
TDZ1 | 0.1%噻苯隆+ 14-羟基芸苔素甾醇 | 150 | 150 |
TDZ2 | 0.1%噻苯隆+复硝酚钠 | 150 | 300 |
TDZ3 | 0.1%噻苯隆+胺鲜酯 | 150 | 150 |
TDZ4 | 0.1%噻苯隆+诱抗素 | 150 | 300 |
TDZ5 | 0.1%噻苯隆+乙烯利 | 150 | 300 |
CK | 清水 | / | / |
施药后天数 Days after medicated(d) | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thick (mm) | 果枝台数 No.of fruit branches(台) | 蕾铃数 The number of the bell(个) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | TDZ1 | 84.27a | 9.19a | 11.8ab | 15.47b |
TDZ2 | 80.37ab | 10.02a | 11.93ab | 15.47b | |
TDZ3 | 78.60b | 9.32a | 11.07ab | 15.87b | |
TDZ4 | 83.33ab | 10.39a | 12.60a | 18.53ab | |
TDZ5 | 85.00a | 10.65a | 12.60a | 21.67a | |
CK | 80.70ab | 10.20a | 10.33b | 14.47b | |
20 | TDZ1 | 89.60a | 10.56a | 12.73ab | 11.60ab |
TDZ2 | 90.00a | 10.99a | 12.47ab | 10.47b | |
TDZ3 | 85.27a | 10.14a | 11.87ab | 11.53ab | |
TDZ4 | 92.73a | 11.15a | 13.33a | 12.60ab | |
TDZ5 | 93.87a | 11.21a | 13.60a | 14.73a | |
CK | 84.28a | 10.33a | 11.07b | 12.67ab | |
30 | TDZ1 | 90.13a | 10.25a | 11.73ab | 9.27ab |
TDZ2 | 90.20a | 10.85a | 11.40ab | 10.00ab | |
TDZ3 | 85.33a | 10.58a | 10.27b | 8.80ab | |
TDZ4 | 93.20a | 11.26a | 12.00ab | 10.53a | |
TDZ5 | 94.53a | 12.00a | 12.60a | 10.53a | |
CK | 85.53a | 10.33a | 11.07ab | 8.53b |
Tab.2 Effects of 0.1% thiabenduron combined with different exogenous substances on agronomic characters of cotton
施药后天数 Days after medicated(d) | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem thick (mm) | 果枝台数 No.of fruit branches(台) | 蕾铃数 The number of the bell(个) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | TDZ1 | 84.27a | 9.19a | 11.8ab | 15.47b |
TDZ2 | 80.37ab | 10.02a | 11.93ab | 15.47b | |
TDZ3 | 78.60b | 9.32a | 11.07ab | 15.87b | |
TDZ4 | 83.33ab | 10.39a | 12.60a | 18.53ab | |
TDZ5 | 85.00a | 10.65a | 12.60a | 21.67a | |
CK | 80.70ab | 10.20a | 10.33b | 14.47b | |
20 | TDZ1 | 89.60a | 10.56a | 12.73ab | 11.60ab |
TDZ2 | 90.00a | 10.99a | 12.47ab | 10.47b | |
TDZ3 | 85.27a | 10.14a | 11.87ab | 11.53ab | |
TDZ4 | 92.73a | 11.15a | 13.33a | 12.60ab | |
TDZ5 | 93.87a | 11.21a | 13.60a | 14.73a | |
CK | 84.28a | 10.33a | 11.07b | 12.67ab | |
30 | TDZ1 | 90.13a | 10.25a | 11.73ab | 9.27ab |
TDZ2 | 90.20a | 10.85a | 11.40ab | 10.00ab | |
TDZ3 | 85.33a | 10.58a | 10.27b | 8.80ab | |
TDZ4 | 93.20a | 11.26a | 12.00ab | 10.53a | |
TDZ5 | 94.53a | 12.00a | 12.60a | 10.53a | |
CK | 85.53a | 10.33a | 11.07ab | 8.53b |
施药后天数 Days after medicated(d) | 处理 Treatment | 生物量积累量(g/株) Total dry matter accumulation(g/plant) | 生物量分配比例 Dry matter distribution proportion(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 蕾、花、铃 Bud,flower,boll | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 蕾、花、铃 Bud,flower,boll | ||
10 | TDZ1 | 28.75±0.46a | 22.55±0.96a | 21.72±0.98a | 39.42±1.15ab | 30.86±0.53a | 29.72±0.62ab |
TDZ2 | 25.71±0.96bcd | 19.77±0.56b | 16.18±0.63c | 41.68±0.34a | 32.07±0.47a | 26.23±0.68b | |
TDZ3 | 26.62±0.90ab | 19.20±0.78b | 18.13±0.93bc | 41.63±0.88a | 30.01±0.64a | 28.37±1.46ab | |
TDZ4 | 27.20±0.99ab | 20.06±0.88b | 18.07±0.85bc | 41.62±0.60a | 30.69±0.88a | 27.69±1.46b | |
TDZ5 | 24.17±0.73cd | 19.81±0.82b | 20.61±0.78ab | 37.43±0.87b | 30.64±0.52a | 31.93±1.13a | |
CK | 23.34±0.58a | 16.41±0.55c | 15.38±0.95b | 42.35±1.27a | 29.77±1.07a | 27.88±1.56b | |
20 | TDZ1 | 27.79±0.87a | 19.34±0.78b | 35.25±0.68a | 33.72±0.81a | 23.49±0.93bc | 42.79±0.14cd |
TDZ2 | 27.05±0.87a | 22.51±0.76a | 35.58±0.77a | 31.77±0.89abc | 26.43±0.54a | 41.80±1.10d | |
TDZ3 | 25.76±0.69ab | 16.81±0.65c | 36.34±0.44a | 32.64±0.44ab | 21.29±0.47d | 46.07±0.86ab | |
TDZ4 | 25.68±0.92ab | 19.45±0.82b | 35.94±0.64a | 31.67±0.55bc | 23.97±0.43b | 44.36±0.51bc | |
TDZ5 | 23.05±0.73c | 16.80±0.46c | 36.30±0.83a | 30.26±0.40c | 22.06±0.21cd | 47.68±0.60a | |
CK | 23.39±0.53bc | 14.81±0.69c | 32.77±0.78b | 32.97±0.22ab | 20.85±0.47d | 46.19±0.25ab |
Tab.3 Effects of 0.1% thiabenduron combined with different exogenous substances on dry matter of cotton
施药后天数 Days after medicated(d) | 处理 Treatment | 生物量积累量(g/株) Total dry matter accumulation(g/plant) | 生物量分配比例 Dry matter distribution proportion(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 蕾、花、铃 Bud,flower,boll | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 蕾、花、铃 Bud,flower,boll | ||
10 | TDZ1 | 28.75±0.46a | 22.55±0.96a | 21.72±0.98a | 39.42±1.15ab | 30.86±0.53a | 29.72±0.62ab |
TDZ2 | 25.71±0.96bcd | 19.77±0.56b | 16.18±0.63c | 41.68±0.34a | 32.07±0.47a | 26.23±0.68b | |
TDZ3 | 26.62±0.90ab | 19.20±0.78b | 18.13±0.93bc | 41.63±0.88a | 30.01±0.64a | 28.37±1.46ab | |
TDZ4 | 27.20±0.99ab | 20.06±0.88b | 18.07±0.85bc | 41.62±0.60a | 30.69±0.88a | 27.69±1.46b | |
TDZ5 | 24.17±0.73cd | 19.81±0.82b | 20.61±0.78ab | 37.43±0.87b | 30.64±0.52a | 31.93±1.13a | |
CK | 23.34±0.58a | 16.41±0.55c | 15.38±0.95b | 42.35±1.27a | 29.77±1.07a | 27.88±1.56b | |
20 | TDZ1 | 27.79±0.87a | 19.34±0.78b | 35.25±0.68a | 33.72±0.81a | 23.49±0.93bc | 42.79±0.14cd |
TDZ2 | 27.05±0.87a | 22.51±0.76a | 35.58±0.77a | 31.77±0.89abc | 26.43±0.54a | 41.80±1.10d | |
TDZ3 | 25.76±0.69ab | 16.81±0.65c | 36.34±0.44a | 32.64±0.44ab | 21.29±0.47d | 46.07±0.86ab | |
TDZ4 | 25.68±0.92ab | 19.45±0.82b | 35.94±0.64a | 31.67±0.55bc | 23.97±0.43b | 44.36±0.51bc | |
TDZ5 | 23.05±0.73c | 16.80±0.46c | 36.30±0.83a | 30.26±0.40c | 22.06±0.21cd | 47.68±0.60a | |
CK | 23.39±0.53bc | 14.81±0.69c | 32.77±0.78b | 32.97±0.22ab | 20.85±0.47d | 46.19±0.25ab |
处理 Treatment | 收获株数 No. of harvested plants (104株/hm2) | 单株结铃数 No. of bolls per plant (个/株) | 单铃重 Boll mass (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield(kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDZ1 | 22.00±0.72a | 7.16±0.77a | 6.31±0.11ab | 9 895.81±848.15a | 4 444.21±381.54a | 44.93±1.07a |
TDZ2 | 21.01±1.20a | 6.42±0.55a | 7.02±0.70a | 9 597.03±1 797.55a | 4 307.43±813.29a | 44.86±0.59a |
TDZ3 | 22.65±1.70a | 6.33±0.30a | 6.77±0.64a | 9 721.67±835.05a | 4 420.57±419.18a | 45.40±0.55a |
TDZ4 | 21.85±1.47a | 6.87±0.42a | 6.09±0.38ab | 9 101.64±809.62a | 4 119.91±376.72a | 45.26±0.67a |
TDZ5 | 22.18±1.68a | 6.21±0.22a | 6.25±0.16ab | 8 647.77±920.80a | 3 901.48±382.79a | 45.20±0.46a |
CK | 21.29±0.76a | 6.43±0.23a | 5.49±0.12b | 7 507.10±231.63a | 3 275.75±124.25a | 43.62±0.38a |
Tab.4 Effects of 0.1% thiabenduron combined with different exogenous substances on cotton yield and components
处理 Treatment | 收获株数 No. of harvested plants (104株/hm2) | 单株结铃数 No. of bolls per plant (个/株) | 单铃重 Boll mass (g) | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield(kg/hm2) | 皮棉产量 Lint yield (kg/hm2) | 衣分 Lint percentage(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDZ1 | 22.00±0.72a | 7.16±0.77a | 6.31±0.11ab | 9 895.81±848.15a | 4 444.21±381.54a | 44.93±1.07a |
TDZ2 | 21.01±1.20a | 6.42±0.55a | 7.02±0.70a | 9 597.03±1 797.55a | 4 307.43±813.29a | 44.86±0.59a |
TDZ3 | 22.65±1.70a | 6.33±0.30a | 6.77±0.64a | 9 721.67±835.05a | 4 420.57±419.18a | 45.40±0.55a |
TDZ4 | 21.85±1.47a | 6.87±0.42a | 6.09±0.38ab | 9 101.64±809.62a | 4 119.91±376.72a | 45.26±0.67a |
TDZ5 | 22.18±1.68a | 6.21±0.22a | 6.25±0.16ab | 8 647.77±920.80a | 3 901.48±382.79a | 45.20±0.46a |
CK | 21.29±0.76a | 6.43±0.23a | 5.49±0.12b | 7 507.10±231.63a | 3 275.75±124.25a | 43.62±0.38a |
处理 Treatment | 整齐度 Uniformity index(%) | 断裂比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 伸长率 Elongationrate (%) | 上半部纤维长度 Upper half mean length (mm) | 马克隆值 Micronaire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDZ1 | 83.47±0.49a | 28.77±1.04a | 6.63±0.03b | 28.53±0.38a | 4.64±0.25a |
TDZ2 | 84.23±0.71a | 30.13±1.03a | 6.73±0.03ab | 29.37±0.94a | 4.79±0.07a |
TDZ3 | 84.70±0.87a | 30.87±0.58a | 6.80±0.06a | 29.13±0.22a | 4.64±0.30a |
TDZ4 | 82.83±0.58a | 27.87±1.05a | 6.67±0.03ab | 28.63±0.08a | 4.69±0.05a |
TDZ5 | 82.77±0.94a | 29.60±1.68a | 6.67±0.03ab | 29.37±0.80a | 4.46±0.43a |
CK | 82.50±0.40a | 29.67±0.52a | 6.73±0.07ab | 29.74±0.22a | 4.37±0.30a |
Tab.5 Effects of 0.1% thiabenduron combined with different exogenous substances on cotton fiber quality
处理 Treatment | 整齐度 Uniformity index(%) | 断裂比强度 Fiber strength (cN/tex) | 伸长率 Elongationrate (%) | 上半部纤维长度 Upper half mean length (mm) | 马克隆值 Micronaire |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDZ1 | 83.47±0.49a | 28.77±1.04a | 6.63±0.03b | 28.53±0.38a | 4.64±0.25a |
TDZ2 | 84.23±0.71a | 30.13±1.03a | 6.73±0.03ab | 29.37±0.94a | 4.79±0.07a |
TDZ3 | 84.70±0.87a | 30.87±0.58a | 6.80±0.06a | 29.13±0.22a | 4.64±0.30a |
TDZ4 | 82.83±0.58a | 27.87±1.05a | 6.67±0.03ab | 28.63±0.08a | 4.69±0.05a |
TDZ5 | 82.77±0.94a | 29.60±1.68a | 6.67±0.03ab | 29.37±0.80a | 4.46±0.43a |
CK | 82.50±0.40a | 29.67±0.52a | 6.73±0.07ab | 29.74±0.22a | 4.37±0.30a |
性状 Character | 株高 Plant height | 茎粗 Stem thick | 果枝台数 No. of fruit branches | 蕾铃数 Cotton boll buds | 单株结铃数 No. of bolls per plant | 单铃重 Boll mass | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 1 | ||||||
茎粗 Stem thick | 0.676** | 1 | |||||
果枝台数 No. of fruit branches | 0.698** | 0.714** | 1 | ||||
蕾铃数 Cotton boll buds | 0.604** | 0.599** | 0.624** | 1 | |||
单株结铃数 No. of bolls per plant | 0.372 | 0.083 | 0.301 | 0.138 | 1 | ||
单铃重 Boll mass | -0.056 | 0.181 | -0.073 | 0.023 | 0.215 | 1 | |
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield | 0.046 | 0.289 | 0.165 | 0.026 | 0.564* | 0.809** | 1 |
Tab.6 Correlation Analysis between cotton agronomic characters and yield and its components
性状 Character | 株高 Plant height | 茎粗 Stem thick | 果枝台数 No. of fruit branches | 蕾铃数 Cotton boll buds | 单株结铃数 No. of bolls per plant | 单铃重 Boll mass | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height | 1 | ||||||
茎粗 Stem thick | 0.676** | 1 | |||||
果枝台数 No. of fruit branches | 0.698** | 0.714** | 1 | ||||
蕾铃数 Cotton boll buds | 0.604** | 0.599** | 0.624** | 1 | |||
单株结铃数 No. of bolls per plant | 0.372 | 0.083 | 0.301 | 0.138 | 1 | ||
单铃重 Boll mass | -0.056 | 0.181 | -0.073 | 0.023 | 0.215 | 1 | |
籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield | 0.046 | 0.289 | 0.165 | 0.026 | 0.564* | 0.809** | 1 |
[1] | 尚玉磊, 李春喜, 姜丽娜, 等. 生长调节剂对小麦旗叶衰老和产量性状的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2001, 21(2):72-75. |
SHANG Yulei, LI Chunxi, JIANG Lina, et al. Effects of growth regulators on flag leaf senescence and yield traits of wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2001, 21(2): 72-75. | |
[2] | CAMPOY J A, RUIZ D, EGEA J. Effects of shading and thidiazuron + oil treatment on dormancy breaking, blooming and fruit set in apricot in a warm-winter climate[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2010, 125(3):200-210. |
[3] | 杨国强. 噻苯隆在草莓的残留分析及其对草莓相关酶活性水平的影响研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019. |
YANG Guoqiang. Residue analysis of thiabenduron in strawberry and its effect on Strawberry related enzyme activity[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2019. | |
[4] |
李钊阳, Shaukat Ali, 唐良德, 等. 0.2%噻苯隆可溶液剂对金桔产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(16):33-36.
DOI |
LI Zhaoyang, Shaukat Ali, TANG Liangdei, et al. Effect of 0.2% thiabenduron solution on Yield and quality of Kumquat[J]. Chinese Agronomy Bulletin, 2021, 37(16): 33-36. | |
[5] | 樊翠芹, 张丽, 于翠红, 等. 0.1%噻苯隆可溶性液剂在巨峰葡萄上的应用效果[J]. 河北农业科学, 2016, 20(6):40-45. |
FEN Cuiqing, ZHANG Li, YU Cuihong, et al. Application effect of 0.1% thiabenduron soluble solution on Jufeng grape[J]. Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 20(6): 40-45. | |
[6] | 许曼琳, 高庆刚, 潘月庆, 等. 芸苔素内酯复配剂对花生条纹病毒病的田间药效评价[J]. 花生学报, 2020, 49(2):73-76. |
XU Manli, GAO Qinggang, PAN Yueqing, et al. Field efficacy evaluation of brassinolide compound on Peanut stripe virus disease[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2020, 49(2): 73-76. | |
[7] | 王庆彬, 彭春娥, 孟慧, 等. 芸苔素内酯·吲哚乙酸·赤霉酸在不同氮浓度下对小白菜产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业资源与环境学报, 2021, 38(4):626-635. |
WANG Qingbin, PENG Chune, MENG Hui, et al. Effects of brassinolide, indoleacetic acid and gibberellic acid on Yield and quality of Chinese Cabbage under different nitrogen concentrations[J]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2021, 38(4): 626-635. | |
[8] | 薛珠政, 康玉妹, 温庆放. 芸苔素内酯·胺鲜酯水分散粒剂对大白菜生长效果的研究试验[J]. 上海蔬菜, 2016,(3):47-48. |
XUE Zhuzheng, KANG Yumei, WEN Qingfang. Study on the effect of Brassinolide · aminopropyl ester water dispersible granules on the growth of Chinese cabbage[J]. Shanghai Vegetables, 2016,(3): 47-48. | |
[9] | 宋伟丰, 韦庆慧, 刘凯, 等. 芸苔素甾醇复配磷酸二氢钾对耐盐碱水稻产量影响的研究[J]. 现代农药, 2022, 21(2):62-64,72. |
SONG Weifeng, WEI Qinghui, LIU Kai, et al. Effect of brassinosterol combined with potassium dihydrogen phosphate on yield of saline alkali tolerant rice[J]. Modern Agrochemicals, 2022, 21(2): 62-64,72. | |
[10] | 夏雪岩, 程汝宏, 陈媛, 等. 植物生长调节剂和叶面肥对谷子杂交种的防早衰效应分析[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2014, 16(1):104-110. |
XIA Xueyan, CHENG Ruhong, CHEN Yuan, et al. Effect of plant growth regulator and foliar fertilizer on preventing premature senescence of millet hybrids[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014, 16 (1): 104-110. | |
[11] | 卜令铎, 李江舟, 张立猛, 等. 5种外源活性物质促进烤烟增产提质的机制研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(5):941-947. |
BU Lingduo, LI Jiangzhou, ZHANG Limeng, et al. Study on the mechanism of five exogenous active substances promoting the yield and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(5): 941-947. | |
[12] |
彭田伟, 谢会雅, 李思军, 等. 复硝酚钠和枯草芽孢杆菌复配对烟苗生长和生理指标的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2022, 24(4):154-161.
DOI |
PENG Tianwei, XIE Huiya, LI Sijun, et al. Effects of sodium dinitrophenol and Bacillus subtilis on growth and physiological indexes of tobacco seedlings[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2022, 24(4): 154-161.
DOI |
|
[13] | 樊翠芹, 于翠红, 张丽, 等. 30%胺鲜酯·乙烯利水剂对巨峰葡萄果实着色和品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2017, 21(5):42-46. |
FAN Cuiqin, YU Cuihong, ZHANG Li, et al. Effects of 30% prochloraz·ethephon on fruit coloring and quality of Jufeng grape[J]. Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 21(5): 42-46. | |
[14] | 徐加利, 尹红增, 周海燕, 等. 复硝酚钠和胺鲜酯·复硝酚钠对大棚番茄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 植物医生, 2019, 32(1):23-26. |
XU Jiali, YIN Hongzeng, ZHOU Haiyan, et al. Effects of sodium dinitrophenol and prochloraz·sodium dinitrophenol on growth and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato[J]. Doctor Plant, 2019, 32(1): 23-26. | |
[15] | 万宣伍, 李国慧, 邢艳, 等. 10%S-诱抗素可溶性粉剂对葡萄产量及品质的影响[J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2021, 12(3):925-930. |
WAN Xuanwu, LI Guohui, XING Yan, et al. Effects of 10% S-inducible resistin soluble powder on grape yield and quality[J]. Journal of Food Safety and Quality, 2021, 12 (3): 925-930. | |
[16] | 鱼冰星, 王宏富, 王振华, 等. 化学调控对谷子茎秆性状及其籽粒产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2022, 57(1):40-47,55. |
YU Bingxing, WANG Hongfu, WANG Zhenhua, et al. Effects of chemical regulation on stem characters and grain yield of millet[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2022, 57(1): 40-47,55. | |
[17] | 李瑞杰, 闫鹏, 王庆燕, 等. 5-氨基乙酰丙酸和乙烯利对东北春玉米功能叶光合生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021,(1):135-142. |
LI Ruijie, YAN Peng, WANG Qingyan, et al. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid and ethephon on Photosynthetic Physiological Characteristics and yield of functional leaves of northeast spring maize[J]. Crops, 2021,(1): 135-142. | |
[18] | 李汉忠, 张国英. 乙烯利、矮壮素复配剂在夏玉米不同生育时期的试验效果分析[J]. 种业导刊, 2010,(1):28-29. |
LI Hanzhong, ZHANG Guoying. Experimental effect analysis of Ethephon and chlormequat compound in different growth stages of summer maize[J]. Journal of Seed Industry Guide, 2010,(1): 28-29. | |
[19] | 向运佳, 谭杰, 李星月, 等. 化控技术在农业生产中的地位与应用前景[J]. 四川农业科技, 2017,(1):37-39. |
XIANG Yunjia, TAN Jie, LI Xingyue, et al. Status and application prospect of chemical control technology in agricultural production[J]. Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(1): 37-39. | |
[20] |
阿力木江·克来木, 赵强, 占东霞, 等. 外源物质对化学封顶棉花农艺性状及产量形成的调控效应[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2019, 21(10):20-29.
DOI |
Alimujiang Kelam, ZHAO Qiang, ZHAN Dongxia, et al. Effects of exogenous substances on Agronomic Characters and yield formation of chemically capped cotton[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019, 21 (10): 20-29.
DOI |
|
[21] | 段强, 王冲, 孙燕, 等. 1.8%复硝酚钠水剂对棉花生长的调节作用[J]. 农药研究与应用, 2011, 15(2):26-28. |
DUAN Qiang, WANG Chong, SUN Yan, et al. Regulating effect of 1.8% sodium dinitrophenol on Cotton Growth[J]. Agronmicals Research and Application, 2011, 15(2): 26-28. | |
[22] | 文廷刚, 王伟中, 杨文飞, 等. 水稻茎秆形态特征与抗倒伏能力对外源植物生长调节剂的响应差异[J]. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(1):48-55. |
WEN Tinggang, WANG Weizhong, YANG Wenfei, et al. Difference in response of morphological characteristics and lodging resistance of rice stem to exogenous plant growth regulators[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 51(1): 48-55. | |
[23] | 文廷刚, 贾艳艳, 杜小凤, 等. 基于Richards方程的水稻强、弱势籽粒灌浆特征对外源植物生长调节剂的调控响应[J/OL]. 南京农业大学学报:1-14[2022-04-05]. |
WEN Tinggang, JIA Yanyan, DU Xiaofen, et al. Response of strong and weak grain filling characteristics of rice to exogenous plant growth regulators based on Richards equation[J/OL]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University: 1-14 [2022-04-05]. | |
[24] | 姚晨涛, 姜兴印, 孙晓, 等. 0.25% S-诱抗素水剂调节番茄生长田间药效试验[J]. 现代农药, 2019, 18(2):50-51,56. |
YAO Chentao, JIANG Xingyin, SUN Xiao, et al. Field efficacy experiment of 0.25% S-inducible resistin on regulating tomato growth[J]. Modern Pesticides, 2019, 18 (2): 50-51,56. | |
[25] | 陈英侠, 冀洪策. S-诱抗素在邓州市棉花生产中试验示范报告[J]. 农家参谋, 2017,(6):36. |
CHEN Yingxia, JI Hongce. Experimental demonstration report of S-inducible resistin in cotton production in Dengzhou City[J]. The Farmers Consultant, 2017,(6): 36. | |
[26] | 刘承德, 曹导叶, 陈继选, 等. 噻苯隆对大豆农艺性状与产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2007,(5):60-62. |
LIU Chengde, CAO Daoye, CHEN Jixuan, et al. Effects of thiuron on soybean yield[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(5): 60-62. | |
[27] | 王学奎, 骆炳山, 屈映兰. 油菜素内酯促进小麦灌浆结实及其生理基础的研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1990, 9(2):123-128. |
WANG Xuekui, LUO Bingshan, QU Yinglan. Study on brassinolide promoting grain filling and seed setting of wheat and its physiological basis[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 1990, 9(2): 123 - 128. | |
[28] | 刘承德, 曹导叶, 陈继选, 等. 噻苯隆对夏玉米农艺性状和产量影响的试验初报[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2007,(4):58-59. |
LIU Chengde, CAO Daoye, CHEN Jixuan, et al. Preliminary report on the effects of thiabenduron on Agronomic Characters and yield of summer maize[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(4): 58-59. | |
[29] | 刘晓双, 顾万荣, 张立国, 等. 噻苯隆-乙烯利复配剂对玉米子粒脱水效果及产量品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(5):934-940. |
LIU Xiaoshuang, GU Wanrong, ZHANG Liguo, et al. Effects of thiabenduron ethephon compound on dehydration effect, yield and quality of corn kernels[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(5): 934-940. | |
[30] | 于福利, 白伟, 王素琴, 等. 噻苯隆促进甜瓜生长效果及安全性研究[J]. 农药科学与管理, 2015, 36(9):45-48. |
YU Fuli, BAI Wei, WANG Shuqin, et al. Study on the effect and safety of thiabenduron in promoting the growth of melon[J]. Pesticide Science and Management, 2015, 36(9): 45-48. | |
[31] | 张云, 姚刚, 张建党, 等. 噻苯隆 1204 对烟叶生长发育和产质量的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2002,(3): 20-23. |
ZHANG Yun, YAO Gang, ZHANG Jiandang, et al. Effects of thifenuron 1204 on growth, yield and quality of tobacco leaves[J]. Shaanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2002,(3): 20-23. | |
[32] | 杜晓东, 崔海燕, 王建平, 等. 0.1%噻苯隆可溶性液剂对甜瓜产量和品质的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2014, 18(5):42-44,84. |
DU Xiaodong, CUI Haiyan, WANG Jianping, et al. Effect of 0.1% thiabenduron soluble solution on Yield and quality of melon[J]. Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 18(5): 42-44,84. | |
[33] | 夏丽娟, 陈浩, 侯勇. 赤霉酸和噻苯隆复配的室内活性测定及葡萄田间试验效果研究[J]. 安徽大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):98-104. |
XIA Lijuan, CHEN Hao, HOU Yong. Laboratory activity determination of the combination of gibberellic acid and thiabenduron and Study on the effect of grape field experiment[J]. Journal of Anhui University (Natural Science Ed.), 2021, 45(1): 98-104. | |
[34] | 王燕, 王树林, 张谦, 等. 机采棉主要农艺性状与密度相关性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(6):66-70. |
WANG Yan, WANG Shulin, ZHANG Qian, et al. Correlation analysis between main agronomic characters and density of mechanically harvested cotton[J]. Crops, 2019,(6): 66-70. | |
[35] | 石建斌, 周红, 王宁, 等. 陆地棉纤维品质与主要农艺性状的相关性分析[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2019, 35(4):770-775. |
SHI Jianbin, ZHOU Hong, WANG Ning, et al. Correlation analysis between fiber quality and main agronomic characters of upland cotton[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 35(4): 770-775. |
[1] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[2] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[3] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[4] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[5] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[6] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[7] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[8] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[9] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[10] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[11] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[12] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[13] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[15] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 85
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||