Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (6): 1389-1397.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.06.011
• Germplasm Resources·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry·Soil Fertilizer·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles
JIANG Zhu1,2(), ZHANG Jianghui2, BAI Yungang2(
), YANG Pengnian1, LIU Hongbo2, XIAO Jun2, LIU Xuhui2,3
Received:
2022-10-09
Online:
2023-06-20
Published:
2023-06-20
Correspondence author:
BAI Yungang(1974-),male, Qitai, Xinjiang, Professor-level senior engineer, The research direction is agricultural water and soil engineering,(E-mail) xjbaiyg@sina.com
Supported by:
江柱1,2(), 张江辉2, 白云岗2(
), 杨鹏年1, 刘洪波2, 肖军2, 刘旭辉2,3
通讯作者:
白云岗(1974-),男,新疆奇台人,教授级高级工程师,研究方向为农业水土工程,(E-mail) xjbaiyg@sina.com
作者简介:
江柱(1996-),男,四川自贡人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农田水利工程,(E-mail)jiangzhu55@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
JIANG Zhu, ZHANG Jianghui, BAI Yungang, YANG Pengnian, LIU Hongbo, XIAO Jun, LIU Xuhui. Effects of fertilizer and salt regulation on cotton growth and yield under plastic film drip irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
处理 Treatment | 苗期 Seedling stage | 蕾期 Bud stage | 花铃期 Flowering and Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12~47 d | 57 d | 67 d | 77 d | 83~123 d | 123~156 d | |
C1N1 | 10.2a | 40.2a | 63.3a | 82.8a | 88.5a | 88.7a |
C1N2 | 10.3a | 40.5a | 63.2a | 80.4ab | 85.5ab | 86.3a |
C1N3 | 10.2a | 39.5ab | 62.3ab | 78.7abc | 82.2abc | 82.1ab |
C2N1 | 10.3a | 40.5a | 62.7a | 77.3abcd | 81.3abc | 81.9ab |
C2N2 | 10.1a | 40.1a | 61.3ab | 74.8abcd | 78.7bcd | 78.2abc |
C2N3 | 10.1a | 38.2ab | 58.5ab | 71.1bcde | 74.5cde | 74.3abc |
C3N1 | 10.2a | 37.7ab | 58.1ab | 68.6cde | 71.5de | 69.7bc |
C3N2 | 10.2a | 34.4b | 54.3ab | 66.8de | 69.5e | 68.8bc |
C3N3 | 10.1a | 34.7b | 48.1b | 61.4e | 66.8e | 65.7c |
两因素(F值)Two-way ANOVA(F value) | ||||||
淡咸水混合比例 Combination (C) | 10.45*** | 13.03*** | 32.23*** | 29.40*** | 25.56*** | |
施氮量 Nitrogen (N) | 1.71 ns | 3.59* | 4.88* | 3.82* | 3.05ns | |
淡咸水混合比例×施氮量 Interaction (C×N) | 0.60 ns | 1.03ns | 0.19ns | 0.045ns | 0.11ns |
Tab.1 Effect of fertilizer and salt regulation on cotton plant height under salt water drip irrigation under film(mm)
处理 Treatment | 苗期 Seedling stage | 蕾期 Bud stage | 花铃期 Flowering and Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12~47 d | 57 d | 67 d | 77 d | 83~123 d | 123~156 d | |
C1N1 | 10.2a | 40.2a | 63.3a | 82.8a | 88.5a | 88.7a |
C1N2 | 10.3a | 40.5a | 63.2a | 80.4ab | 85.5ab | 86.3a |
C1N3 | 10.2a | 39.5ab | 62.3ab | 78.7abc | 82.2abc | 82.1ab |
C2N1 | 10.3a | 40.5a | 62.7a | 77.3abcd | 81.3abc | 81.9ab |
C2N2 | 10.1a | 40.1a | 61.3ab | 74.8abcd | 78.7bcd | 78.2abc |
C2N3 | 10.1a | 38.2ab | 58.5ab | 71.1bcde | 74.5cde | 74.3abc |
C3N1 | 10.2a | 37.7ab | 58.1ab | 68.6cde | 71.5de | 69.7bc |
C3N2 | 10.2a | 34.4b | 54.3ab | 66.8de | 69.5e | 68.8bc |
C3N3 | 10.1a | 34.7b | 48.1b | 61.4e | 66.8e | 65.7c |
两因素(F值)Two-way ANOVA(F value) | ||||||
淡咸水混合比例 Combination (C) | 10.45*** | 13.03*** | 32.23*** | 29.40*** | 25.56*** | |
施氮量 Nitrogen (N) | 1.71 ns | 3.59* | 4.88* | 3.82* | 3.05ns | |
淡咸水混合比例×施氮量 Interaction (C×N) | 0.60 ns | 1.03ns | 0.19ns | 0.045ns | 0.11ns |
处理 Treatment | 苗期 Seedling stage | 蕾期 Bud stage | 花铃期 Flowering and Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12~47 d | 57 d | 67 d | 77 d | 83~123 d | 123~156 d | |
C1N1 | 0.64a | 2.01a | 3.28a | 4.57a | 5.08a | 4.24ab |
C1N2 | 0.64a | 2.20a | 3.24a | 4.14a | 4.54ab | 3.94abc |
C1N3 | 0.62a | 2.05a | 3.35a | 4.05a | 4.51ab | 3.84abc |
C2N1 | 0.57a | 2.18a | 3.31a | 4.10a | 4.46ab | 4.34a |
C2N2 | 0.60a | 1.88ab | 2.95ab | 3.82a | 4.16bc | 3.93abc |
C2N3 | 0.55a | 1.73b | 2.69abc | 3.79a | 4.02bc | 3.79abc |
C3N1 | 0.63a | 2.16a | 2.67abc | 2.95c | 4.08bc | 3.38bc |
C3N2 | 0.55a | 1.95ab | 2.29bc | 2.87c | 3.56c | 3.30bc |
C3N3 | 0.55a | 1.73b | 1.99c | 2.74c | 3.42c | 3.10c |
两因素(F值)Two-way ANOVA(F value) | ||||||
淡咸水混合比例 Combination (C) | 0.49 ns | 19.16*** | 50.05*** | 25.50*** | 14.61*** | |
施氮量 Nitrogen (N) | 3.88* | 3.24* | 3.23* | 8.74** | 3.35* | |
淡咸水混合比例×施氮量 Interaction (C×N) | 1.21 ns | 1.13ns | 0.31ns | 0.07ns | 0.20 ns |
Tab.2 Effects of fertilizer and salt regulation on cotton leaf area index under salt water drip irrigation under film
处理 Treatment | 苗期 Seedling stage | 蕾期 Bud stage | 花铃期 Flowering and Bolling stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12~47 d | 57 d | 67 d | 77 d | 83~123 d | 123~156 d | |
C1N1 | 0.64a | 2.01a | 3.28a | 4.57a | 5.08a | 4.24ab |
C1N2 | 0.64a | 2.20a | 3.24a | 4.14a | 4.54ab | 3.94abc |
C1N3 | 0.62a | 2.05a | 3.35a | 4.05a | 4.51ab | 3.84abc |
C2N1 | 0.57a | 2.18a | 3.31a | 4.10a | 4.46ab | 4.34a |
C2N2 | 0.60a | 1.88ab | 2.95ab | 3.82a | 4.16bc | 3.93abc |
C2N3 | 0.55a | 1.73b | 2.69abc | 3.79a | 4.02bc | 3.79abc |
C3N1 | 0.63a | 2.16a | 2.67abc | 2.95c | 4.08bc | 3.38bc |
C3N2 | 0.55a | 1.95ab | 2.29bc | 2.87c | 3.56c | 3.30bc |
C3N3 | 0.55a | 1.73b | 1.99c | 2.74c | 3.42c | 3.10c |
两因素(F值)Two-way ANOVA(F value) | ||||||
淡咸水混合比例 Combination (C) | 0.49 ns | 19.16*** | 50.05*** | 25.50*** | 14.61*** | |
施氮量 Nitrogen (N) | 3.88* | 3.24* | 3.23* | 8.74** | 3.35* | |
淡咸水混合比例×施氮量 Interaction (C×N) | 1.21 ns | 1.13ns | 0.31ns | 0.07ns | 0.20 ns |
处理 Treatment | 方程 Equation | Vm (g/d) | t0 (d) | t1 (d) | t2 (d) | Δt (d) | A (g/株) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1N1 | Y=107.54/[1+e(6.93-0.078t)] | 2.10 | 89 | 72 | 106 | 34 | 107.54 | 0.960 |
C1N2 | Y=102.83/[1+e(6.79-0.077t)] | 1.98 | 88 | 71 | 105 | 34 | 102.83 | 0.943 |
C1N3 | Y=98.16/[1+e(3.39-0.072t)] | 1.77 | 89 | 70 | 107 | 37 | 98.16 | 0.961 |
C2N1 | Y=104.51/[1+e(6.16-0.068t)] | 1.78 | 91 | 71 | 110 | 39 | 104.51 | 0.976 |
C2N2 | Y=88.70/[1+e(5.80-0.065t)] | 1.44 | 89 | 69 | 109 | 41 | 88.70 | 0.930 |
C2N3 | Y=85.24/[1+e(5.86-0.062t)] | 1.32 | 95 | 73 | 116 | 42 | 85.24 | 0.960 |
C3N1 | Y=88.79/[1+e(7.41-0.079t)] | 1.75 | 94 | 77 | 110 | 33 | 88.24 | 0.941 |
C3N2 | Y=75.17/[1+e(6.47-0.070t)] | 1.32 | 92 | 74 | 111 | 38 | 75.17 | 0.945 |
C3N3 | Y=74.45/[1+e(6.40-0.068t)] | 1.27 | 94 | 75 | 113 | 39 | 74.45 | 0.952 |
Tab.3 Logistic function growth model and related parameters of aboveground dry matter accumulation of cotton
处理 Treatment | 方程 Equation | Vm (g/d) | t0 (d) | t1 (d) | t2 (d) | Δt (d) | A (g/株) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C1N1 | Y=107.54/[1+e(6.93-0.078t)] | 2.10 | 89 | 72 | 106 | 34 | 107.54 | 0.960 |
C1N2 | Y=102.83/[1+e(6.79-0.077t)] | 1.98 | 88 | 71 | 105 | 34 | 102.83 | 0.943 |
C1N3 | Y=98.16/[1+e(3.39-0.072t)] | 1.77 | 89 | 70 | 107 | 37 | 98.16 | 0.961 |
C2N1 | Y=104.51/[1+e(6.16-0.068t)] | 1.78 | 91 | 71 | 110 | 39 | 104.51 | 0.976 |
C2N2 | Y=88.70/[1+e(5.80-0.065t)] | 1.44 | 89 | 69 | 109 | 41 | 88.70 | 0.930 |
C2N3 | Y=85.24/[1+e(5.86-0.062t)] | 1.32 | 95 | 73 | 116 | 42 | 85.24 | 0.960 |
C3N1 | Y=88.79/[1+e(7.41-0.079t)] | 1.75 | 94 | 77 | 110 | 33 | 88.24 | 0.941 |
C3N2 | Y=75.17/[1+e(6.47-0.070t)] | 1.32 | 92 | 74 | 111 | 38 | 75.17 | 0.945 |
C3N3 | Y=74.45/[1+e(6.40-0.068t)] | 1.27 | 94 | 75 | 113 | 39 | 74.45 | 0.952 |
处理 Treatment | 产量及产量构成因子 Yield and yield components | IWUE (kg/m3) | IFWUE (kg/m3) | WUE (kg/m3) | PFPN (kg/kg) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株铃数 Bolls (个) | 百铃重 Hundred bell weight (g) | 籽棉产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | |||||
C1N1 | 5.89a | 550.88a | 6 921.75a | 1.44a | 1.44d | 0.97a | 17.30cde |
C1N2 | 5.85a | 552.82a | 6 899.70a | 1.44a | 1.44d | 0.98a | 23.00bc |
C1N3 | 5.82b | 547.51ab | 6 432.75b | 1.34ab | 1.34d | 0.91a | 32.20a |
C2N1 | 5.84a | 551.35a | 6 829.80a | 1.42a | 1.78c | 0.97ab | 17.07cde |
C2N2 | 5.75b | 545.52b | 6 191.55b | 1.29abc | 1.61cd | 0.88ab | 20.64bcd |
C2N3 | 5.10cd | 542.07bc | 5 202.30cd | 1.08bcd | 1.35d | 0.74ab | 26.01b |
C3N1 | 5.19c | 530.20bc | 5 271.30bc | 1.10bcd | 2.75a | 0.74ab | 13.18e |
C3N2 | 4.80d | 526.22cd | 4 852.80cd | 1.01cd | 2.53ab | 0.68ab | 16.18de |
C3N3 | 4.78d | 507.54d | 4 297.20d | 0.90d | 2.24b | 0.61b | 21.49bcd |
两因素(F值)Two-way ANOVA(F value) | |||||||
淡咸水混合比例 Combination (C) | 35.63*** | 33.58*** | 93.13*** | 37.62*** | 314.81*** | 17.92*** | 29.64*** |
施氮量Nitrogen (N) | 14.87** | 9.09* | 26.07*** | 10.57** | 27.60*** | 4.57* | 65.81*** |
淡咸水混合比例×施氮量 Combination ×Nitrogen (C×N) | 1.85ns | 1.09ns | 2.67ns | 1.13ns | 3.55* | 0.58ns | 2.53ns |
Tab.4 Cotton yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency
处理 Treatment | 产量及产量构成因子 Yield and yield components | IWUE (kg/m3) | IFWUE (kg/m3) | WUE (kg/m3) | PFPN (kg/kg) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株铃数 Bolls (个) | 百铃重 Hundred bell weight (g) | 籽棉产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | |||||
C1N1 | 5.89a | 550.88a | 6 921.75a | 1.44a | 1.44d | 0.97a | 17.30cde |
C1N2 | 5.85a | 552.82a | 6 899.70a | 1.44a | 1.44d | 0.98a | 23.00bc |
C1N3 | 5.82b | 547.51ab | 6 432.75b | 1.34ab | 1.34d | 0.91a | 32.20a |
C2N1 | 5.84a | 551.35a | 6 829.80a | 1.42a | 1.78c | 0.97ab | 17.07cde |
C2N2 | 5.75b | 545.52b | 6 191.55b | 1.29abc | 1.61cd | 0.88ab | 20.64bcd |
C2N3 | 5.10cd | 542.07bc | 5 202.30cd | 1.08bcd | 1.35d | 0.74ab | 26.01b |
C3N1 | 5.19c | 530.20bc | 5 271.30bc | 1.10bcd | 2.75a | 0.74ab | 13.18e |
C3N2 | 4.80d | 526.22cd | 4 852.80cd | 1.01cd | 2.53ab | 0.68ab | 16.18de |
C3N3 | 4.78d | 507.54d | 4 297.20d | 0.90d | 2.24b | 0.61b | 21.49bcd |
两因素(F值)Two-way ANOVA(F value) | |||||||
淡咸水混合比例 Combination (C) | 35.63*** | 33.58*** | 93.13*** | 37.62*** | 314.81*** | 17.92*** | 29.64*** |
施氮量Nitrogen (N) | 14.87** | 9.09* | 26.07*** | 10.57** | 27.60*** | 4.57* | 65.81*** |
淡咸水混合比例×施氮量 Combination ×Nitrogen (C×N) | 1.85ns | 1.09ns | 2.67ns | 1.13ns | 3.55* | 0.58ns | 2.53ns |
[1] | 杜传莉, 黄国勤. 棉花主要抗旱鉴定指标研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9):17-20. |
DU Chuanli, HUANG Guoqin. Research Progress of Major Identification Indicators in the Cotton Drought-resistance[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(9):17-20.
DOI |
|
[2] | 李志博, 建伟, 李衡, 等. 后期持续干旱对北疆棉花生长发育的影响及其抗旱适应性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(3):45-49, 82. |
LI Zhibo, XU Jianwei, LI Heng, et al. Effect of prolonged drought late growth stage on growth of cotton and evaluation of its drought resistance in North Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2014, 32(3):45-49, 82. | |
[3] | Aldaya M M, Chapagain A K, Hoekstra A Y, et al. The water footprint assessment manual: Setting the global standard[M]. London: Routledge, 2012. |
[4] | 王全九, 徐益敏, 王金栋, 等. 咸水与微咸水在农业灌溉中的应用[J]. 灌溉排水, 2002,(4):73-77. |
WANG Quanjiu, XU Yimin, WANG Jindong, et al. Application of Saline and Slight Saline Water for Farmland Irrigation[J]. Irrigation and Drainage, 2002,(4):73-77. | |
[5] | 贾玉珍, 朱禧月, 唐予迪, 等. 棉花出苗及苗期耐盐性指标的研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1987,(1):30-41. |
JIA Yuzhen, ZHU Xiyue, TANG Yudi, et al. Research on the Targets Tolerant Towards Salt in Cotton Emergence and Seedling Stage[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 1987,(1):30-41. | |
[6] | 罗宾陈恺元等译. 棉花生理学[M]. 上海: 上海科技出版社, 1983. |
Robin, editor in chief, translated by CHEN Kaiyuan, et al). Cotton physiology[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1983. | |
[7] | 宋有玺, 安进强, 何岸镕, 等. 微咸水膜下滴灌对棉花生长发育及其产量的影响研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2016, 23(1):128-132. |
SONG Youxi, AN Jinqiang, HE Anrong, et al. Effect of Mulched Drip Irrigation with Saline Water on Cotton Growth ang Yield[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 23(1):128-132. | |
[8] | 魏红国, 杨鹏年, 张巨松, 等. 咸淡水滴灌对棉花产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(12):2344-2349. |
WEI Hongguo, YANG Pengnian, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Influence Irrigation by Salt- water of and Fresh- water on Cotton Yield and Fiber Quality[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(12):2344-2349. | |
[9] | 林葆, 林继雄, 李家康. 长期施肥的作物产量和土壤肥力变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1994,(1):6-18. |
LIN Bao, LIN Jixiong, LI Jiakang. THE changes of crop yield and soil fertility with long-term fertilizer application[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 1994,(1):6-18. | |
[10] | 张培通, 徐立华, 杨长琴, 等. 施氮量对科棉3号干物质积累及分配、产量和纤维品质的效应[J]. 棉花学报, 2008,(4):295-299. |
ZHANG Peitong, XU Lihua, YANG Changqin, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Dry Matter Accumulation and Its Distribution, Yield and Fiber Quality of Upland Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2008,(4):295-299. | |
[11] | 刘雪艳, 丁邦新, 白云岗, 等. 微咸水膜下滴灌对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2020, 37(6):1627-1634. |
LIU Xueyan, DING Bangxin, BAI Yungang, et al. Effect of drip irrigation under brackish water film on cotton growth and yield[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2020, 37(6):1627-1634. | |
[12] | 闵伟, 侯振安, 冶军, 等. 灌溉水盐度和施氮量对棉花产量和水氮利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4):858-867. |
MIN Wei, HOU Zhenan, YE Jun, et al. Effects of water salinity and nitrogen rate on yield, WUE and NUE of cotton under drip irrigation with saline water conditions[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(4):858-867. | |
[13] | 侯森. 微咸水滴灌棉田水氮利用效率研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2011. |
HOU Sen. Study on water and nitrogen use efficiency of cotton under drip irrigation with saline water[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2011. | |
[14] | 何平如, 张富仓, 范军亮, 等. 土壤水分调控对南疆滴灌棉花生长、品质及水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(4):39-46. |
HE Pingru, ZHANG Fucang, FAN Junliang, et al. Effects of soil moisture regulation on growth,quality and water use of cotton under drip irrigation in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(4):39-46. | |
[15] | 宋明丹, 李正鹏, 冯浩. 不同水氮水平冬小麦干物质积累特征及产量效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(2):119-126. |
SONG Mingdan, LI Zhengpeng, FENG Hao. Effects of irrigation and nitrogen regimes on dry matter dynamic accumulation and yield of winter wheat[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(2):119-126. | |
[16] | 王海江, 崔静, 侯振安, 等. 膜下滴灌棉花水氮耦合对其干物质和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2010, 19(3):76-80. |
WANG Haijiang, CUI Jing, HOU Zhen'an, et al. Impact of Coupling of Water and Nitrogen on Dry Matter and Water Use Efficiency of Cotton under Plastic Mulching by Drip Irrigation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2010, 19(3):76-80. | |
[17] | 王军, 李久生, 关红杰. 北疆膜下滴灌棉花产量及水分生产率对灌水量响应的模拟[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(3):62-68. |
WANG Jun, LI Jiusheng, GUAN Hongjie. Modeling response of cotton yield and water productivity to irrigation amount under mulched drip irrigation in North Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(3):62-68. | |
[18] | 张豫, 朱珠, 蔡德所. 干旱区咸水膜下滴灌对棉花生长与产量的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2015,(9):106-110. |
ZHANG Yu, ZHU Zhu, CAI Desuo. The Effect of the Growth and Yield of Cotton in Arid Land Under-mulch Drip Irrigation with Salt Water[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2015,(9):106-110. | |
[19] | Yang G, Li F, Tian L, et al. Soil physicochemical properties and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield under brackish water mulched drip irrigation[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020:199. |
[20] | 侯森, 侯振安, 冶军, 等. 咸水滴灌条件下棉花生长和氮素吸收对水氮的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(9):1882-1887. |
HOU Sen, HOU Zhenan, YE Jun, et al. Cotton Growth and Nitrogen Uptake in Response to Rates of Water and Nitrogen Under Drip Irrigation with Saline Water[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(9):1882-1887. | |
[21] |
Hoorn J, Katerji N, Hamdy A, et al. Effect of salinity on yield and nitrogen uptake of four grain legumes and on biological nitrogen contribution from the soil[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2001, 51(2):87-98.
DOI URL |
[22] | 刘雪艳, 丁邦新, 白云岗. 微咸水膜下滴灌对棉花植株盐分、养分吸收及品质的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(4):128-135. |
LIU Xueyan, DING Bangxin, BAI Yungang. Effects of drip irrigation with brackish water under film mulch on salinity, nutrients and quality of cotton plants[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(4):128-135. | |
[23] | Coleman J, Others A. Public and Private Schools. An Analysis of High School and Beyond: A National Longitudinal Study for the 1980's[J]. Academic Achievement, 1981:491. |
[24] | 龚江, 吕宁, 茹思博, 等. 滴灌条件下盐分对棉花养分及盐离子吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(3):670-676. |
GONG Jiang, LYU Ning, RU Sibo, et al. Effects of soil salinity on nutrients and ions uptake in cotton with drip irrigation under film[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(3):670-676. |
[1] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[2] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[3] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[4] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[5] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[6] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[7] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[8] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[9] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[10] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[11] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[12] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[13] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[15] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 59
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 898
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||