Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 798-809.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.003
• Cotton regulation technology special column • Previous Articles Next Articles
DAI Jianmin1(), ZHANG Jusong1(
), XU Xinlong1, LI Shixin2, ZHAI Menghua2, SUN Minghui2
Received:
2022-09-03
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Jusong(1963-), professor, research direction is cotton high-yield cultivation and physiological ecology, (E-mail)Supported by:
代健敏1(), 张巨松1(
), 徐新龙1, 李始鑫2, 翟梦华2, 孙明辉2
通讯作者:
张巨松(1963-),男,江苏人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为棉花高产栽培与生理生态,(E-mail)作者简介:
代健敏(1997-),女,河南周口人,硕士研究生,研究方向为棉花高产栽培,(E-mail)wttdjml@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
DAI Jianmin, ZHANG Jusong, XU Xinlong, LI Shixin, ZHAI Menghua, SUN Minghui. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer management on the growth characteristics and yield of drought cotton after hail reseeding[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 798-809.
代健敏, 张巨松, 徐新龙, 李始鑫, 翟梦华, 孙明辉. 氮肥运筹对雹后重播受旱棉花生长特性及产量影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 798-809.
土层 Soil depth (cm) | pH | 全氮 Total N (g/kg) | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 水解性氮 Hydrolytic N (mg/kg) | 有效磷 Available P (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available K (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.25 | 0.3 | 6.21 | 30.8 | 25.7 | 117 |
20~40 | 8.67 | 0.22 | 4.24 | 11.2 | 8 | 68 |
40~60 | 8.26 | 0.19 | 3.44 | 16.8 | 8.8 | 106 |
Tab.1 The soil basic physical and chemical properties
土层 Soil depth (cm) | pH | 全氮 Total N (g/kg) | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 水解性氮 Hydrolytic N (mg/kg) | 有效磷 Available P (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available K (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.25 | 0.3 | 6.21 | 30.8 | 25.7 | 117 |
20~40 | 8.67 | 0.22 | 4.24 | 11.2 | 8 | 68 |
40~60 | 8.26 | 0.19 | 3.44 | 16.8 | 8.8 | 106 |
水分胁迫 Moisture Coercion | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume (m3/hm2) | 基肥占 总施氮量 比例 Base fertilizer accounted for Total nitrogen application rate(%) | 蕾期+花期 Bud stage + Flowering and boll stage | 铃期 Bolls stage | 总施氮量 Total nitrogen application rate (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灌水次数 Irrigation frequency | 施肥次数 Fertilize frequency | 占总施氮量 比例 Percentage of total nitrogen application (%) | 灌水次数 Irrigation frequency | 施肥次数 Irrigation frequency | 占总施氮量 比例 Percentage of total nitrogen application (%) | |||||
CK | N0 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N37 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 56 | 320 | |
N55 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 320 | |
N73 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 56 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 320 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 56 | 320 | |
N2 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 320 | |
N3 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 56 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 320 |
Tab.2 Nitrogen fertilizer operation test plan for different growth periods of field cotton
水分胁迫 Moisture Coercion | 氮肥处理 Nitrogen Treatment | 灌水量 Irrigation volume (m3/hm2) | 基肥占 总施氮量 比例 Base fertilizer accounted for Total nitrogen application rate(%) | 蕾期+花期 Bud stage + Flowering and boll stage | 铃期 Bolls stage | 总施氮量 Total nitrogen application rate (kg/hm2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
灌水次数 Irrigation frequency | 施肥次数 Fertilize frequency | 占总施氮量 比例 Percentage of total nitrogen application (%) | 灌水次数 Irrigation frequency | 施肥次数 Irrigation frequency | 占总施氮量 比例 Percentage of total nitrogen application (%) | |||||
CK | N0 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N37 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 3 | 3 | 56 | 320 | |
N55 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 320 | |
N73 | 3 800 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 56 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 320 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 24 | 4 | 3 | 56 | 320 | |
N2 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 4 | 3 | 40 | 320 | |
N3 | 3 800 | 20 | 3 | 3 | 56 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 320 |
处理 Treatment | 5/18 | 日期(M/D) | 总量 Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/25 | 7/5 | 7/15 | 7/25 | 8/5 | 8/15 | 8/25 | 9/5 | |||
灌水量Irrigation volume(m3/hm2) | ||||||||||
CK 中度水迫 Moderate water stress | / | 570 | 570 | 570 | 760 | 570 | 570 | 190 | / | 3 800 |
/ | 570 | 570 | 760 | 570 | 570 | 190 | 570 | 3 800 | ||
施氮量Nitrogen application(kg/hm2) | ||||||||||
N0 | 0 | / | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | 0 |
N37 | 64 | / | 15.36 | 18.43 | 43.01 | 93.18 | 64.51 | 21.50 | / | 320 |
N55 | 64 | / | 25.60 | 30.72 | 71.68 | 66.56 | 46.08 | 15.36 | / | 320 |
N73 | 64 | / | 35.84 | 43.01 | 100.35 | 39.94 | 27.65 | 9.22 | / | 320 |
Tab.3 Irrigation amount and nitrogen application amount per treatment
处理 Treatment | 5/18 | 日期(M/D) | 总量 Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6/25 | 7/5 | 7/15 | 7/25 | 8/5 | 8/15 | 8/25 | 9/5 | |||
灌水量Irrigation volume(m3/hm2) | ||||||||||
CK 中度水迫 Moderate water stress | / | 570 | 570 | 570 | 760 | 570 | 570 | 190 | / | 3 800 |
/ | 570 | 570 | 760 | 570 | 570 | 190 | 570 | 3 800 | ||
施氮量Nitrogen application(kg/hm2) | ||||||||||
N0 | 0 | / | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | / | 0 |
N37 | 64 | / | 15.36 | 18.43 | 43.01 | 93.18 | 64.51 | 21.50 | / | 320 |
N55 | 64 | / | 25.60 | 30.72 | 71.68 | 66.56 | 46.08 | 15.36 | / | 320 |
N73 | 64 | / | 35.84 | 43.01 | 100.35 | 39.94 | 27.65 | 9.22 | / | 320 |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 盛蕾期 Full squaring stage | 初花期 Early flowering stage | 盛花期 Full flowers stage | 盛铃期 Full bolls stage | 吐絮期 Opening bolls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 6月22日 | 7月16日 | 7月26日 | 8月6日 | 9月14日 |
N37 | 6月22日 | 7月17日 | 7月28日 | 8月13日 | 9月28日 | |
N55 | 6月22日 | 7月17日 | 7月30日 | 8月15日 | 9月25日 | |
N73 | 6月22日 | 7月18日 | 8月1日 | 8月14日 | 9月30日 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 6月22日 | 7月15日 | 7月24日 | 8月3日 | 9月4日 |
N37 | 6月22日 | 7月16日 | 7月26日 | 8月11日 | 9月21日 | |
N55 | 6月22日 | 7月16日 | 7月27日 | 8月8日 | 9月14日 | |
N73 | 6月22日 | 7月17日 | 7月28日 | 8月10日 | 9月23日 |
Tab.4 The comparison of cotton growing period under different treatments
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 盛蕾期 Full squaring stage | 初花期 Early flowering stage | 盛花期 Full flowers stage | 盛铃期 Full bolls stage | 吐絮期 Opening bolls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 6月22日 | 7月16日 | 7月26日 | 8月6日 | 9月14日 |
N37 | 6月22日 | 7月17日 | 7月28日 | 8月13日 | 9月28日 | |
N55 | 6月22日 | 7月17日 | 7月30日 | 8月15日 | 9月25日 | |
N73 | 6月22日 | 7月18日 | 8月1日 | 8月14日 | 9月30日 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 6月22日 | 7月15日 | 7月24日 | 8月3日 | 9月4日 |
N37 | 6月22日 | 7月16日 | 7月26日 | 8月11日 | 9月21日 | |
N55 | 6月22日 | 7月16日 | 7月27日 | 8月8日 | 9月14日 | |
N73 | 6月22日 | 7月17日 | 7月28日 | 8月10日 | 9月23日 |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 现蕾-初花 Full squaring - early flowering | 初花-盛花 Early flowering - full flowers | 盛花-盛铃 Full flowers - full bolls | 盛铃-吐絮 Full bolls - opening bolls | 生育期 Growth period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 24 | 10 | 10 | 38 | 107 |
N37 | 25 | 11 | 15 | 45 | 121 | |
N55 | 25 | 13 | 15 | 40 | 118 | |
N73 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 46 | 123 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 22 | 9 | 9 | 31 | 96 |
N37 | 24 | 10 | 15 | 40 | 114 | |
N55 | 24 | 11 | 10 | 34 | 104 | |
N73 | 25 | 11 | 12 | 43 | 116 |
Tab.5 The comparison of cotton growing stage under different treatments (d)
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 现蕾-初花 Full squaring - early flowering | 初花-盛花 Early flowering - full flowers | 盛花-盛铃 Full flowers - full bolls | 盛铃-吐絮 Full bolls - opening bolls | 生育期 Growth period |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 24 | 10 | 10 | 38 | 107 |
N37 | 25 | 11 | 15 | 45 | 121 | |
N55 | 25 | 13 | 15 | 40 | 118 | |
N73 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 46 | 123 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 22 | 9 | 9 | 31 | 96 |
N37 | 24 | 10 | 15 | 40 | 114 | |
N55 | 24 | 11 | 10 | 34 | 104 | |
N73 | 25 | 11 | 12 | 43 | 116 |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 真叶数 Number stem leaf | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch number | 倒四叶宽 Fall four leaf width (cm) | 双铃率 Double bell rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 83.8c | 10.77d | 14.2d | 6.6c | 14.02bc | 1.08d |
N37 | 100.3a | 11.28abc | 16.9abc | 8.5ab | 16.40a | 8.41b | |
N55 | 98.8a | 10.95ab | 15.8ab | 8.7ab | 14.8bb | 14.29a | |
N73 | 92.2b | 10.23cd | 15.0cd | 8.7ab | 14.60bc | 12.15bc | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 75.5c | 7.95f | 14.2d | 6.1c | 13.79c | 0.00d |
N37 | 96.9a | 11.97a | 17.2a | 9.2a | 15.98a | 15.67a | |
N55 | 89.8ab | 8.77e | 16.3bc | 8.2b | 14.49b | 6.50cd | |
N73 | 90.6ab | 8.64e | 16.1ab | 8.1ab | 14.41b | 10.43ab |
Tab.6 The comparison of cotton main agronomic characters under different treatments
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 真叶数 Number stem leaf | 有效果枝数 Effective fruit branch number | 倒四叶宽 Fall four leaf width (cm) | 双铃率 Double bell rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 83.8c | 10.77d | 14.2d | 6.6c | 14.02bc | 1.08d |
N37 | 100.3a | 11.28abc | 16.9abc | 8.5ab | 16.40a | 8.41b | |
N55 | 98.8a | 10.95ab | 15.8ab | 8.7ab | 14.8bb | 14.29a | |
N73 | 92.2b | 10.23cd | 15.0cd | 8.7ab | 14.60bc | 12.15bc | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 75.5c | 7.95f | 14.2d | 6.1c | 13.79c | 0.00d |
N37 | 96.9a | 11.97a | 17.2a | 9.2a | 15.98a | 15.67a | |
N55 | 89.8ab | 8.77e | 16.3bc | 8.2b | 14.49b | 6.50cd | |
N73 | 90.6ab | 8.64e | 16.1ab | 8.1ab | 14.41b | 10.43ab |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 方程 Equation | t0 (d) | t1 (d) | t2 (d) | △t (d) | Vm (g/(plant·d)) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | Y=84.096 9/(1+e(3.310 8-0.052 935 t)) | 63 | 38 | 87 | 50 | 1.11 | 0.98* |
N37 | Y=128.083 4/(1+e(3.366 7-0.047 224 t)) | 71 | 43 | 99 | 56 | 1.51 | 0.99* | |
N55 | Y=178.840 1/(1+e(3.900 7-0.049 755 t)) | 78 | 52 | 105 | 53 | 2.22 | 0.98* | |
N73 | Y=107.611 1/(1+e(3.357 3-0.060 877 t)) | 55 | 34 | 77 | 43 | 1.64 | 0.99* | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | Y=71.504 0/(1+e(3.314 0-0.053 694 t)) | 62 | 37 | 86 | 49 | 0.96 | 0.99* |
N37 | Y=166.744 4/(1+e(4.232 4-0.054 288 t)) | 78 | 54 | 102 | 49 | 2.26 | 0.99* | |
N55 | Y=97.198 0/(1+e(3.002 9-0.050 132 t)) | 60 | 34 | 86 | 53 | 1.22 | 0.99* | |
N73 | Y=112.757 8/(1+e(3.096 1-0.052 956 t)) | 58 | 34 | 83 | 50 | 1.49 | 0.99* |
Tab.7 The logistic model and its characteristics on dry matter accumulation of cotton
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 方程 Equation | t0 (d) | t1 (d) | t2 (d) | △t (d) | Vm (g/(plant·d)) | R2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | Y=84.096 9/(1+e(3.310 8-0.052 935 t)) | 63 | 38 | 87 | 50 | 1.11 | 0.98* |
N37 | Y=128.083 4/(1+e(3.366 7-0.047 224 t)) | 71 | 43 | 99 | 56 | 1.51 | 0.99* | |
N55 | Y=178.840 1/(1+e(3.900 7-0.049 755 t)) | 78 | 52 | 105 | 53 | 2.22 | 0.98* | |
N73 | Y=107.611 1/(1+e(3.357 3-0.060 877 t)) | 55 | 34 | 77 | 43 | 1.64 | 0.99* | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | Y=71.504 0/(1+e(3.314 0-0.053 694 t)) | 62 | 37 | 86 | 49 | 0.96 | 0.99* |
N37 | Y=166.744 4/(1+e(4.232 4-0.054 288 t)) | 78 | 54 | 102 | 49 | 2.26 | 0.99* | |
N55 | Y=97.198 0/(1+e(3.002 9-0.050 132 t)) | 60 | 34 | 86 | 53 | 1.22 | 0.99* | |
N73 | Y=112.757 8/(1+e(3.096 1-0.052 956 t)) | 58 | 34 | 83 | 50 | 1.49 | 0.99* |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 单株干物质积累量 Plant dry matter accumulation (g) | 营养器官分配比例 Vegetative organs dry matter distribution ratio (%) | 生殖器官分配比例 Reproduction organs dry matter distribution ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 76.513 | 35.80 | 64.20 |
N37 | 108.7 | 38.57 | 61.43 | |
N55 | 144.81 | 36.54 | 63.46 | |
N73 | 102.24 | 39.51 | 60.49 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 65.92 | 33.97 | 66.03 |
N37 | 140.28 | 34.88 | 65.12 | |
N55 | 91.31 | 36.64 | 63.36 | |
N73 | 108.59 | 36.30 | 63.70 |
Tab.8 The comparison of vegetative organs and reproductive organs ratio in cotton boll opening period
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratio | 单株干物质积累量 Plant dry matter accumulation (g) | 营养器官分配比例 Vegetative organs dry matter distribution ratio (%) | 生殖器官分配比例 Reproduction organs dry matter distribution ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 76.513 | 35.80 | 64.20 |
N37 | 108.7 | 38.57 | 61.43 | |
N55 | 144.81 | 36.54 | 63.46 | |
N73 | 102.24 | 39.51 | 60.49 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 65.92 | 33.97 | 66.03 |
N37 | 140.28 | 34.88 | 65.12 | |
N55 | 91.31 | 36.64 | 63.36 | |
N73 | 108.59 | 36.30 | 63.70 |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratior | 单株结铃数 Bolls per plant | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 衣分 Fiber yield | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Yield increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 6.16d | 5.65a | 0.44bc | 4 775.40c | |
N37 | 7.07c | 5.93a | 0.45abc | 5 764.94b | 20.72 | |
N55 | 8.04a | 5.96a | 0.44c | 6 570.16a | 37.58 | |
N73 | 7.21bc | 5.90a | 0.46c | 5 821.96b | 21.91 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 5.25d | 5.84a | 0.43c | 4 213.88c | |
N37 | 7.91ab | 6.10a | 0.46a | 6 629.73a | 57.33 | |
N55 | 6.54c | 5.52a | 0.44c | 4 946.90b | 17.39 | |
N73 | 6.8c | 5.98a | 0.44abc | 5 601.81b | 32.93 |
Tab.9 The comparison of yield and its components of cotton under different treatments
水分胁迫 Water stress | 施氮比例 Nitrogen application ratior | 单株结铃数 Bolls per plant | 单铃重 Boll weight (g) | 衣分 Fiber yield | 籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield (kg/hm2) | 增产率 Yield increase rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | N0 | 6.16d | 5.65a | 0.44bc | 4 775.40c | |
N37 | 7.07c | 5.93a | 0.45abc | 5 764.94b | 20.72 | |
N55 | 8.04a | 5.96a | 0.44c | 6 570.16a | 37.58 | |
N73 | 7.21bc | 5.90a | 0.46c | 5 821.96b | 21.91 | |
中度水迫 Moderate water stress | N0 | 5.25d | 5.84a | 0.43c | 4 213.88c | |
N37 | 7.91ab | 6.10a | 0.46a | 6 629.73a | 57.33 | |
N55 | 6.54c | 5.52a | 0.44c | 4 946.90b | 17.39 | |
N73 | 6.8c | 5.98a | 0.44abc | 5 601.81b | 32.93 |
[1] | 王平, 陈新平, 田长彦, 等. 不同水氮管理对棉花产量、品质及养分平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005,(4): 761-769. |
WANG Ping, CHEN Xinping, TIAN Zhangyan, et al. Effects of Different Water and Nitrogen Management on Cotton Yield, Quality and Nutrient Balance[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005,(4): 761-769. | |
[2] |
姚青青, 孙绘健, 马兴旺, 等. 减量追施氮肥运筹对棉花地上部干物质积累、分配及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(8): 1398-1405.
DOI |
YAO Qingqing, SUN Huijian, MA Xingwang, et al. Effect of Nitrogen Application of Reduced Topdressing on Dry Matter Accumulation, Distribution and Yield of Cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(8): 1398-1405.
DOI |
|
[3] | 石洪亮, 张巨松, 严青青, 等. 非充分滴灌下施氮量对棉花生长特性、产量及水氮利用率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(4): 129-136. |
SHI Hongliang, ZHANG Jusong, YAN Qingqing, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate under insufficient drip irrigation on cotton growth characteristics, yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(4): 129-136. | |
[4] | 万艳霞, 金卫平, 王广恩, 等. 棉花子叶期遇冰雹形成不同类型棉株生长发育差异的研究[C]. 2004: 3. |
WAN Yanxia, JIN Weiping, WANG Guang'en, et al. Study on the Growth and Development Differences of Different Types of Cotton Plants Formed by Hail at the Cotyledon Stage of Cotton[C]. Paper Collection of the 2004 Annual Meeting of the Cotton Society of China, 2004: 3. | |
[5] | 严建昌. 阿克苏地区冰雹灾害对棉花生产的影响[J]. 南方农业, 2016, 10(21): 218-220. |
YAN Jianchang. Influence of Hail Disaster on Cotton Production in Aksu Area[J]. South China Agriculture, 2016, 10(21): 218-220. | |
[6] | 宁松瑞, 左强, 石建初, 等. 新疆典型膜下滴灌棉花种植模式的用水效率与效益[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22): 90-99. |
NING Songrui, ZUO Qiang, SHI Jianchu, et al. Water use efficiency and benefits of typical cotton planting patterns under mulch drip irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(22): 90-99. | |
[7] |
张海娜, 李存东, 肖凯. 氮素对不同衰老特性棉花品种光合特性和细胞保护酶活性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2008,(5): 170-174.
DOI |
ZHANG Haina, LI Cundong, XIAO Kai. Effects of Nitrogen on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Cytoprotective Enzyme Activities of Cotton Varieties with Different Senescence Characteristics[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2008, (5): 170-174. | |
[8] | 刘永红, 杨勤, 杨文钰, 等. 花期干湿交替对玉米干物质积累与再分配的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006,(11): 1723-1727. |
LIU Yonghong, YANG Qin, YANG Wenyu, et al. Effect of Alternation of Drying and Wetting During Flowering on Dry Matter Accumulation and Redistribution of Maize[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006,(11): 1723-1727. | |
[9] | 赖波, 汤明尧, 柴仲平, 等. 新疆农田化肥施用现状调查与评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(6): 1024-1030. |
LAI Bo, TANG Mingyao, CHAI Zhongping, et al. Investigation and Evaluation of Current Status of Chemical Fertilizer Application in Xinjiang Farmland[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2014, 31(6): 1024-1030. | |
[10] | 夏德强, 呼小洲, 张海亮. 西部某地区农业面源污染现状及防治对策[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(5): 222-223. |
XIA Deqiang, HU Xiaozhou, ZHANG Hailiang. Current Status of Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution and Countermeasures in a Certain Western Region[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(5): 222-223. | |
[11] | 韩会玲, 康凤君. 水分胁迫对棉花生产影响的试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2001,(3): 37-40. |
HAN Huiling, KANG Fengjun. Experimental Study on the Effect of Water Stress on Cotton Production[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2001,(3): 37-40. | |
[12] | 刘翠, 张巨松, 郑慧, 等. 氮肥基追比对杂交棉生长发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2014, 23(12): 102-109. |
LIU Cui, ZHANG Jusong, ZHENG Hui, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Dressing Ratio on the Growth and Yield Formation of Hybrid Cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2014, 23(12): 102-109. | |
[13] | 胡国智, 张炎, 李青军, 等. 氮肥运筹对棉花干物质积累、氮素吸收利用和产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(2): 397-403. |
HU Guozhi, ZHANG Yan, LI Qingjun, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Management on Cotton Dry Matter Accumulation, Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization and Yield[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2011, 17(2): 397-403. | |
[14] | 丁红, 成波, 张冠初, 等. 施用氮肥对干旱胁迫下花生生理特性的影响[J]. 花生学报, 2021, 50(2): 64-68. |
DING Hong, CHENG Bo, ZHANG Guanchu, et al. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Physiological Characteristics of Peanut under Drought Stress[J]. Journal of Peanut Science, 2021, 50(2): 64-68. | |
[15] |
何梦迪, 钟宣伯, 周启政, 等. 氮肥缓解苗期干旱对小麦根系形态建成及生理特性的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2019, 33(11): 2246-2253.
DOI |
HE Mengdi, ZHONG Xuanbo, ZHOU Qizheng, et al. Nitrogen fertilizer alleviates the effects of drought in seedling stage on morphogenesis and physiological characteristics of wheat roots[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 33(11): 2246-2253. | |
[16] | 闫曼曼, 郑剑超, 张巨松, 等. 蕾期调亏灌溉对海岛棉棉铃发育及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2015, 27(4): 354-361. |
YAN Manman, ZHENG Jianchao, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation at Bud Stage on Boll Development and Yield of Sea Island Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2015, 27(4): 354-361. | |
[17] |
PADHI J, MISRA Rk, PAYERO Jo. Estimation of soil water deficit in an irrigated cotton field with infrared thermography[J]. Field Crop Res, 2012, 126(1): 45-55.
DOI URL |
[18] | Ramoliya P J, Patel H M, Pandey A N. Effect of salinization of soil on growth and macro- and micro-nutrient accumulation in seedlings of Salvadora persica (Salvadoraceae)[J]. Forest Ecology & Management, 2004, 202(1-3): 181-193. |
[19] | 郑剑超, 唐亚楠, 闫曼曼, 等. 光胁迫下氮肥运筹对棉花生长发育与产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2014, 37(1): 1-6. |
ZHENG Jianchao, TANG Yanan, YAN Manman, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Cotton Growth and Yield under Light Stress[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2014, 37(1): 1-6. | |
[20] | 陈求柱. 氮肥运筹对棉花产量形成及养分吸收利用的影响研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013. |
CHEN Qiuzhu. Study on the Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Cotton Yield Formation and Nutrient Uptake and Utilization[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013. | |
[21] | 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 张旺锋, 等. 新疆滴灌棉花花铃期干旱复水对叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008,(1): 171-174. |
LUO Honghai, ZHANG Yali, ZHANG Wangfeng, et al. Effect of Drought and Rewatering on Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Cotton during Flowering and Boll Period with Drip Irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, (1): 171-174. | |
[22] | 李鹏程, 董合林, 刘爱忠, 等. 施氮量对棉花功能叶片生理特性、氮素利用效率及产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(1): 81-91. |
LI Pengcheng, DONG Helin, LIU Aizhong, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on physiological characteristics, nitrogen use efficiency and yield of cotton functional leaves[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015, 21(1): 81-91. | |
[23] | 张旺锋, 王振林, 余松烈, 等. 氮肥对新疆高产棉花群体光合性能和产量形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2002,(6): 789-796. |
ZHANG Wangfeng, WANG Zhenlin, YU Songlie, et al. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Performance and Yield Formation of High-yield Cotton in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2002, (6): 789-796. | |
[24] |
Milroy S P, Bange M P. Nitrogen and Light Responses of Cotton Photosynthesis and Implications for Crop Growth[J]. Crop Science, 2003, 43(3): 904-913.
DOI URL |
[25] |
Song C J, Ma K M, Qu L Y, et al. Interactive effects of water, nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth, biomass partitioning and water-use efficiency of Bauhinia faberi seedlings[J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 2010, 74(9):1003-1012.
DOI URL |
[26] | 黄绍文, 金继运, 董悦厚, 等. 追肥运筹对优质小麦产量和品质的影响[J]. 土壤肥料, 2003,(2):3-6. |
HUANG Shaowen, JIN Jiyun, DONG Yuehou, et al. The effect of top dressing management on the yield and quality of high-quality wheat[J]. Soil and Fertilizer, 2003,(2):3-6. | |
[27] | 王晓英, 贺明荣, 刘永环, 等. 水氮耦合对冬小麦氮肥吸收及土壤硝态氮残留淋溶的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2008,(2): 685-694. |
WANG Xiaoying, HE Mingrong, LIU Yonghuan, et al. Effects of Water and Nitrogen Coupling on Winter Wheat Nitrogen Fertilizer Absorption and Soil Nitrate Nitrogen Residual Leaching[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, (2): 685-694. | |
[28] | 王朝辉, 王兵, 李生秀. 缺水与补水对小麦氮素吸收及土壤残留氮的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004,(8): 1339-1343. |
WANG Chaohui, WANG Bing, LI Shengxiu. Effects of Water Deficiency and Supplementation on Nitrogen Uptake of Wheat and Residual Nitrogen in Soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, (8): 1339-1343. | |
[29] | 李世清, 邵明安, 李紫燕, 等. 小麦籽粒灌浆特征及影响因素的研究进展[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003,(11): 2030-2038. |
LI Shiqing, SHAO Ming'an, LI Ziyan, et al. Research progress of wheat grain filling characteristics and influencing factors[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2003, (11): 2030-2038. | |
[30] | 汪玲, 朱靖蓉, 杨涛, 等. 氮肥施用策略对棉花干物质积累及产量构成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(10): 1952-1957. |
WANG Ling, ZHU Jingrong, YANG Tao, et al. Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application Strategy on Cotton Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield Components[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(10): 1952-1957. | |
[31] | 陈素芳, 屠灿英, 陈英, 等. 不同氮肥运筹比例对华粳8号生长发育及产量、品质的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2020,(10): 56-61. |
CHEN Sufang, TU Canying, CHEN Ying, et al. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Ratios on the Growth and Development, Yield and Quality of Huajing 8[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter, 2020,(10): 56-61. | |
[32] |
张永强, 张璐, 徐珊, 等. 追氮时期及比例对滴灌冬小麦生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(25): 1-6.
DOI |
ZHANG Yongqiang, ZHANG Lu, XU Shan, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing Period and Ratio on Growth Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat with Drip Irrigation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(25): 1-6.
DOI |
|
[33] | 段晓丽, 张富林, 倪承凡, 等. 前氮后移对水稻产量形成和田面水氮素动态变化的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(1): 255-261. |
DUAN Xiaoli, ZHANG Fulin, NI Chengfan, et al. Effect of front nitrogen shift on rice yield formation and field water nitrogen dynamic changes[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(1): 255-261. |
[1] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[2] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[3] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[4] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[5] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[6] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[7] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[8] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[9] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[10] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[11] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[12] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[13] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[15] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 59
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 1232
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||