Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (2): 291-301.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.02.004
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
NIU Yuan1(), YANG Xiangkun2, ZHANG Zhanqin2, MA Fuyu1(
)
Received:
2021-01-11
Online:
2022-02-20
Published:
2022-03-22
Correspondence author:
MA Fuyu
Supported by:
通讯作者:
马富裕
作者简介:
牛媛(1992-),女,山东定陶人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物信息技术与精准栽培,(E-mail) 360211472@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
NIU Yuan, YANG Xiangkun, ZHANG Zhanqin, MA Fuyu. Effects of Different Irrigation Amounts on Dry Matter Accumulation of Cotton under Film Uncovering Cultivation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(2): 291-301.
牛媛, 杨相昆, 张占琴, 马富裕. 揭膜种植方式下不同灌水量对棉花干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(2): 291-301.
月份 Month | 灌水次数 Irrigation frequency | 尿素 Urea (kg/hm2) | 66%磷酸钾铵 66% Ammonium potassium phosphate phosphate(kg/hm2) | 灌水量Irrigation (m3/hm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W3 | ||||
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
6 | 1 | 15 | 15 | 225 | 270 | 337.5 |
2 | 75 | 30 | 450 | 540 | 675 | |
7 | 3 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 |
4 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 | |
5 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 | |
6 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 | |
8 | 7 | 30 | 30 | 525 | 630 | 787.5 |
8 | 0 | 30 | 525 | 630 | 787.5 | |
合计Total | 600 | 345 | 4 425 | 5 310 | 6 637.5 |
Table 1 Irrigation and fertilization methods for each treatment
月份 Month | 灌水次数 Irrigation frequency | 尿素 Urea (kg/hm2) | 66%磷酸钾铵 66% Ammonium potassium phosphate phosphate(kg/hm2) | 灌水量Irrigation (m3/hm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
W1 | W2 | W3 | ||||
4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 150 | 150 | 150 |
6 | 1 | 15 | 15 | 225 | 270 | 337.5 |
2 | 75 | 30 | 450 | 540 | 675 | |
7 | 3 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 |
4 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 | |
5 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 | |
6 | 120 | 60 | 675 | 810 | 1 012.5 | |
8 | 7 | 30 | 30 | 525 | 630 | 787.5 |
8 | 0 | 30 | 525 | 630 | 787.5 | |
合计Total | 600 | 345 | 4 425 | 5 310 | 6 637.5 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总干物质 Total biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.973 | 24.33 | 72 | 61 | 117 | 56 | 911.05 | 2 063.26 |
T2 | 0.968 | 28.23 | 79 | 66 | 127 | 61 | 1 193.42 | 2 634.53 | ||
T3 | 0.982 | 23.21 | 83 | 58 | 117 | 59 | 1 234.25 | 2 076.03 | ||
T4 | 0.960 | 19.20 | 77 | 55 | 107 | 52 | 918.43 | 1 530.87 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.969 | 22.68 | 78 | 53 | 103 | 50 | 1 130.79 | 1 717.29 | |
T2 | 0.997 | 25.15 | 79 | 75 | 136 | 61 | 1 193.42 | 3 044.40 | ||
T3 | 0.989 | 25.12 | 82 | 63 | 119 | 56 | 1 189.34 | 2 196.86 | ||
T4 | 0.980 | 23.34 | 84 | 60 | 107 | 47 | 1 099.09 | 1 667.66 | ||
营养器官生物量 Biomass of vegetative organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.965 | 17.54 | 57 | 44 | 69 | 25 | 443.75 | 658.73 |
T2 | 0.992 | 18.13 | 57 | 44 | 70 | 26 | 465.52 | 706.98 | ||
T3 | 0.978 | 14.91 | 56 | 40 | 72 | 32 | 473.67 | 719.35 | ||
T4 | 0.968 | 15.16 | 57 | 44 | 69 | 25 | 388 | 589.25 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.982 | 18.35 | 54 | 42 | 65 | 23 | 410.63 | 623.61 | |
T2 | 0.980 | 10.60 | 60 | 42 | 79 | 37 | 395.44 | 600.54 | ||
T3 | 0.989 | 12.94 | 76 | 54 | 97 | 43 | 553.81 | 841.06 | ||
T4 | 0.915 | 12.10 | 60 | 45 | 76 | 31 | 372.56 | 565.80 | ||
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
生殖器官生物量 Biomass of reproductive organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.997 | 24.99 | 110 | 92 | 128 | 36 | 893.87 | 1 357.5 |
T2 | 0.993 | 108.20 | 144 | 122 | 166 | 44 | 4 750.49 | 7 214.42 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 57.88 | 126 | 108 | 144 | 36 | 2 108.84 | 3 202.62 | ||
T4 | 0.989 | 22.48 | 106 | 90 | 121 | 31 | 705.82 | 1 071.90 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.986 | 37.45 | 123 | 100 | 146 | 46 | 1 693.71 | 2 572.19 | |
T2 | 0.999 | 79.54 | 136 | 114 | 159 | 45 | 3 596.16 | 5 461.38 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 43.03 | 125 | 103 | 146 | 43 | 1 872.99 | 2 844.44 | ||
T4 | 0.998 | 21.24 | 99 | 83 | 114 | 31 | 672.20 | 1 013.25 | ||
根系生物量 Root biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.997 | 1.95 | 66 | 45 | 87 | 42 | 81.30 | 123.47 |
T2 | 0.963 | 2.53 | 86 | 54 | 118 | 64 | 160.83 | 243.96 | ||
T3 | 0.970 | 2.05 | 66 | 40 | 93 | 53 | 108.83 | 165.28 | ||
T4 | 0.994 | 2.04 | 65 | 45 | 87 | 42 | 81.06 | 132.21 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.997 | 2.34 | 60 | 41 | 78 | 37 | 84.90 | 128.93 | |
T2 | 0.964 | 2.06 | 76 | 48 | 105 | 57 | 116.81 | 177.40 | ||
T3 | 0.945 | 2.37 | 63 | 44 | 83 | 39 | 91.39 | 138.79 | ||
T4 | 0.988 | 1.69 | 69 | 42 | 95 | 53 | 88.73 | 134.75 |
Table 2 Characteristic value of dry matter accumulation under different irrigation amount after uncovering plastic film (in 2016)
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总干物质 Total biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.973 | 24.33 | 72 | 61 | 117 | 56 | 911.05 | 2 063.26 |
T2 | 0.968 | 28.23 | 79 | 66 | 127 | 61 | 1 193.42 | 2 634.53 | ||
T3 | 0.982 | 23.21 | 83 | 58 | 117 | 59 | 1 234.25 | 2 076.03 | ||
T4 | 0.960 | 19.20 | 77 | 55 | 107 | 52 | 918.43 | 1 530.87 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.969 | 22.68 | 78 | 53 | 103 | 50 | 1 130.79 | 1 717.29 | |
T2 | 0.997 | 25.15 | 79 | 75 | 136 | 61 | 1 193.42 | 3 044.40 | ||
T3 | 0.989 | 25.12 | 82 | 63 | 119 | 56 | 1 189.34 | 2 196.86 | ||
T4 | 0.980 | 23.34 | 84 | 60 | 107 | 47 | 1 099.09 | 1 667.66 | ||
营养器官生物量 Biomass of vegetative organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.965 | 17.54 | 57 | 44 | 69 | 25 | 443.75 | 658.73 |
T2 | 0.992 | 18.13 | 57 | 44 | 70 | 26 | 465.52 | 706.98 | ||
T3 | 0.978 | 14.91 | 56 | 40 | 72 | 32 | 473.67 | 719.35 | ||
T4 | 0.968 | 15.16 | 57 | 44 | 69 | 25 | 388 | 589.25 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.982 | 18.35 | 54 | 42 | 65 | 23 | 410.63 | 623.61 | |
T2 | 0.980 | 10.60 | 60 | 42 | 79 | 37 | 395.44 | 600.54 | ||
T3 | 0.989 | 12.94 | 76 | 54 | 97 | 43 | 553.81 | 841.06 | ||
T4 | 0.915 | 12.10 | 60 | 45 | 76 | 31 | 372.56 | 565.80 | ||
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
生殖器官生物量 Biomass of reproductive organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.997 | 24.99 | 110 | 92 | 128 | 36 | 893.87 | 1 357.5 |
T2 | 0.993 | 108.20 | 144 | 122 | 166 | 44 | 4 750.49 | 7 214.42 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 57.88 | 126 | 108 | 144 | 36 | 2 108.84 | 3 202.62 | ||
T4 | 0.989 | 22.48 | 106 | 90 | 121 | 31 | 705.82 | 1 071.90 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.986 | 37.45 | 123 | 100 | 146 | 46 | 1 693.71 | 2 572.19 | |
T2 | 0.999 | 79.54 | 136 | 114 | 159 | 45 | 3 596.16 | 5 461.38 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 43.03 | 125 | 103 | 146 | 43 | 1 872.99 | 2 844.44 | ||
T4 | 0.998 | 21.24 | 99 | 83 | 114 | 31 | 672.20 | 1 013.25 | ||
根系生物量 Root biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.997 | 1.95 | 66 | 45 | 87 | 42 | 81.30 | 123.47 |
T2 | 0.963 | 2.53 | 86 | 54 | 118 | 64 | 160.83 | 243.96 | ||
T3 | 0.970 | 2.05 | 66 | 40 | 93 | 53 | 108.83 | 165.28 | ||
T4 | 0.994 | 2.04 | 65 | 45 | 87 | 42 | 81.06 | 132.21 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.997 | 2.34 | 60 | 41 | 78 | 37 | 84.90 | 128.93 | |
T2 | 0.964 | 2.06 | 76 | 48 | 105 | 57 | 116.81 | 177.40 | ||
T3 | 0.945 | 2.37 | 63 | 44 | 83 | 39 | 91.39 | 138.79 | ||
T4 | 0.988 | 1.69 | 69 | 42 | 95 | 53 | 88.73 | 134.75 |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总干物质 Total biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.934 | 22.25 | 88 | 66 | 111 | 45 | 1 007.12 | 1 529.48 |
T2 | 0.996 | 22.69 | 90 | 67 | 113 | 46 | 1 071.02 | 1 580.96 | ||
T3 | 0.998 | 20.11 | 63 | 71 | 126 | 55 | 1 095.62 | 1 688.58 | ||
T4 | 0.996 | 18.23 | 62 | 64 | 112 | 48 | 876.46 | 1 317.39 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.997 | 18.23 | 91 | 65 | 118 | 53 | 957.42 | 1 454.00 | |
T2 | 0.985 | 18.72 | 97 | 70 | 124 | 54 | 1 025.30 | 1 557.08 | ||
T3 | 0.972 | 16.46 | 94 | 67 | 122 | 55 | 909.06 | 1 380.56 | ||
T4 | 0.998 | 16.76 | 82 | 60 | 105 | 45 | 748.81 | 1 137.19 | ||
营养器官 生物量 Biomass of vegetative organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.952 | 8.87 | 58 | 42 | 74 | 33 | 280.33 | 425.72 |
T2 | 0.948 | 10.49 | 65 | 51 | 79 | 28 | 295.15 | 448.23 | ||
T3 | 0.958 | 5.30 | 103 | 54 | 153 | 99 | 524.97 | 797.25 | ||
T4 | 0.957 | 9.65 | 63 | 49 | 76 | 27 | 271.66 | 394.24 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.995 | 8.51 | 62 | 46 | 79 | 33 | 281.78 | 427.94 | |
T2 | 0.979 | 7.23 | 58 | 42 | 75 | 33 | 232.88 | 353.67 | ||
T3 | 0.947 | 8.49 | 60 | 46 | 75 | 29 | 243.63 | 369.99 | ||
T4 | 0.926 | 8.85 | 59 | 45 | 74 | 29 | 257.72 | 391.39 | ||
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
生殖器官 生物量 Biomass of reproductive organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.992 | 34.14 | 99 | 91 | 107 | 16 | 519.52 | 788.97 |
T2 | 0.998 | 22.87 | 102 | 88 | 117 | 29 | 673.16 | 1 022.30 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 23.73 | 103 | 91 | 114 | 23 | 551.74 | 837.90 | ||
T4 | 0.996 | 21.51 | 98 | 88 | 109 | 21 | 443.63 | 673.72 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.998 | 18.81 | 100 | 86 | 113 | 27 | 499.75 | 758.95 | |
T2 | 0.998 | 22.61 | 114 | 96 | 132 | 36 | 814.97 | 1 257.67 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 18.31 | 104 | 91 | 118 | 27 | 503.79 | 765.09 | ||
T4 | 0.999 | 18.30 | 92 | 83 | 101 | 18 | 335.38 | 509.32 | ||
根系生物量 Root biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.924 | 2.05 | 61 | 44 | 78 | 34 | 70.25 | 103.96 |
T2 | 0.968 | 2.16 | 66 | 50 | 82 | 32 | 69.19 | 105.07 | ||
T3 | 0.925 | 2.04 | 63 | 48 | 78 | 30 | 60.96 | 92.59 | ||
T4 | 0.968 | 2.69 | 64 | 50 | 77 | 27 | 70.73 | 107.41 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.899 | 1.60 | 67 | 44 | 90 | 46 | 73.83 | 112.11 | |
T2 | 0.934 | 2.11 | 60 | 47 | 74 | 27 | 55.56 | 84.37 | ||
T3 | 0.749 | 1.87 | 64 | 47 | 81 | 33 | 61.92 | 94.04 | ||
T4 | 0.967 | 2.23 | 67 | 50 | 85 | 35 | 76.57 | 116.28 |
Table 3 Characteristic value of dry matter accumulation under different irrigation amount after uncovering plastic film (in 2017)
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总干物质 Total biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.934 | 22.25 | 88 | 66 | 111 | 45 | 1 007.12 | 1 529.48 |
T2 | 0.996 | 22.69 | 90 | 67 | 113 | 46 | 1 071.02 | 1 580.96 | ||
T3 | 0.998 | 20.11 | 63 | 71 | 126 | 55 | 1 095.62 | 1 688.58 | ||
T4 | 0.996 | 18.23 | 62 | 64 | 112 | 48 | 876.46 | 1 317.39 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.997 | 18.23 | 91 | 65 | 118 | 53 | 957.42 | 1 454.00 | |
T2 | 0.985 | 18.72 | 97 | 70 | 124 | 54 | 1 025.30 | 1 557.08 | ||
T3 | 0.972 | 16.46 | 94 | 67 | 122 | 55 | 909.06 | 1 380.56 | ||
T4 | 0.998 | 16.76 | 82 | 60 | 105 | 45 | 748.81 | 1 137.19 | ||
营养器官 生物量 Biomass of vegetative organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.952 | 8.87 | 58 | 42 | 74 | 33 | 280.33 | 425.72 |
T2 | 0.948 | 10.49 | 65 | 51 | 79 | 28 | 295.15 | 448.23 | ||
T3 | 0.958 | 5.30 | 103 | 54 | 153 | 99 | 524.97 | 797.25 | ||
T4 | 0.957 | 9.65 | 63 | 49 | 76 | 27 | 271.66 | 394.24 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.995 | 8.51 | 62 | 46 | 79 | 33 | 281.78 | 427.94 | |
T2 | 0.979 | 7.23 | 58 | 42 | 75 | 33 | 232.88 | 353.67 | ||
T3 | 0.947 | 8.49 | 60 | 46 | 75 | 29 | 243.63 | 369.99 | ||
T4 | 0.926 | 8.85 | 59 | 45 | 74 | 29 | 257.72 | 391.39 | ||
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | R2 | Vm (d) | x0 (d) | x1 (d) | x2 (d) | △x (d) | GT (g) | K (g/m2) | |
生殖器官 生物量 Biomass of reproductive organs | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.992 | 34.14 | 99 | 91 | 107 | 16 | 519.52 | 788.97 |
T2 | 0.998 | 22.87 | 102 | 88 | 117 | 29 | 673.16 | 1 022.30 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 23.73 | 103 | 91 | 114 | 23 | 551.74 | 837.90 | ||
T4 | 0.996 | 21.51 | 98 | 88 | 109 | 21 | 443.63 | 673.72 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.998 | 18.81 | 100 | 86 | 113 | 27 | 499.75 | 758.95 | |
T2 | 0.998 | 22.61 | 114 | 96 | 132 | 36 | 814.97 | 1 257.67 | ||
T3 | 0.999 | 18.31 | 104 | 91 | 118 | 27 | 503.79 | 765.09 | ||
T4 | 0.999 | 18.30 | 92 | 83 | 101 | 18 | 335.38 | 509.32 | ||
根系生物量 Root biomass | 新陆早45号 | T1 | 0.924 | 2.05 | 61 | 44 | 78 | 34 | 70.25 | 103.96 |
T2 | 0.968 | 2.16 | 66 | 50 | 82 | 32 | 69.19 | 105.07 | ||
T3 | 0.925 | 2.04 | 63 | 48 | 78 | 30 | 60.96 | 92.59 | ||
T4 | 0.968 | 2.69 | 64 | 50 | 77 | 27 | 70.73 | 107.41 | ||
新陆早42号 | T1 | 0.899 | 1.60 | 67 | 44 | 90 | 46 | 73.83 | 112.11 | |
T2 | 0.934 | 2.11 | 60 | 47 | 74 | 27 | 55.56 | 84.37 | ||
T3 | 0.749 | 1.87 | 64 | 47 | 81 | 33 | 61.92 | 94.04 | ||
T4 | 0.967 | 2.23 | 67 | 50 | 85 | 35 | 76.57 | 116.28 |
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |||
产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 2016 | 新陆早45号 | 4 114.38±253.70a | 4 411.62±191.34a | 3 920.44±255.56a | 3 920.44±48.94a |
新陆早42号 | 3 800.81±27.19a | 3 947.63±286.21a | 3 829.45±188.14a | 3 407.50±95.24a | ||
2017 | 新陆早45号 | 4 893.32±183.21a | 5 117.66±60.23a | 4 397.89±366.98a | 4 141.67±345.40a | |
新陆早42号 | 4 355.68±173.08a | 4 484.15±50.56a | 4 095.07±176.83a | 4 187.50±127.48a | ||
灌溉水 利用效率 iWUE (kg/m3) | 2016 | 新陆早45号 | 0.93±0.02a | 0.98±0.04a | 0.71±0.02b | 0.54±0.02b |
新陆早42号 | 0.86±0.01a | 0.89±0.01a | 0.72±0.01ab | 0.51±0.05b | ||
2017 | 新陆早45号 | 1.11±0.04a | 1.16±0.01a | 0.83±0.01b | 0.62±0.02c | |
新陆早42号 | 0.77±0.03a | 1.01±0.00a | 0.71±0.03b | 0.54±0.02c |
Table 4 Effects of different irrigation treatments on yield cotton and irrigation water utilization efficiency
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | |||
产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 2016 | 新陆早45号 | 4 114.38±253.70a | 4 411.62±191.34a | 3 920.44±255.56a | 3 920.44±48.94a |
新陆早42号 | 3 800.81±27.19a | 3 947.63±286.21a | 3 829.45±188.14a | 3 407.50±95.24a | ||
2017 | 新陆早45号 | 4 893.32±183.21a | 5 117.66±60.23a | 4 397.89±366.98a | 4 141.67±345.40a | |
新陆早42号 | 4 355.68±173.08a | 4 484.15±50.56a | 4 095.07±176.83a | 4 187.50±127.48a | ||
灌溉水 利用效率 iWUE (kg/m3) | 2016 | 新陆早45号 | 0.93±0.02a | 0.98±0.04a | 0.71±0.02b | 0.54±0.02b |
新陆早42号 | 0.86±0.01a | 0.89±0.01a | 0.72±0.01ab | 0.51±0.05b | ||
2017 | 新陆早45号 | 1.11±0.04a | 1.16±0.01a | 0.83±0.01b | 0.62±0.02c | |
新陆早42号 | 0.77±0.03a | 1.01±0.00a | 0.71±0.03b | 0.54±0.02c |
[1] | 杨荣, 田长彦, 买文选. 新疆膜下滴灌棉花早衰的根系生长发育特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016,(5):1384-1392. |
YANG Rong, TIAN Changyan, MAI Wenxuan. Characteristics of root development in cotton suffering presenility under drip irrigation and film mulch in Xinjiang Autonomous Region[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016,(5):1384-1392. | |
[2] | 胡灿, 王旭峰, 陈学庚, 等. 新疆农田残膜污染现状及防控策略[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24):223-234. |
HU Chan, WANG Xufeng, CHEN Xuegeng, et al. Present situation and prevention and control strategy of farmland residual film pollution in Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(24):223-234. | |
[3] | 周明冬, 侯洪, 董合干, 等. 新疆农用地膜应用与残留污染现状分析[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2015, 56(12):2058-2061. |
ZHOU Mingdong, HOU Hong, DONG Hegan, et al. Application of agricultural plastic film and analysis of residual pollution in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 56(12):2058-2061. | |
[4] |
WU LY, QIN F, FENG JM, et al. Regional climate effects of plastic film mulch over the cropland of arid and semi-arid regions in Northwest China using a regional climate model[J]. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2020, 139(1-2):335-349.
DOI URL |
[5] | QI YL, Ossowicki A, YANG XM, et al. Effects of plastic mulch film residues on wheat rhizosphere and soil properties[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 387. |
[6] | 祖米来提·吐尔干, 林涛, 严昌荣, 等. 地膜覆盖时间对新疆棉田水热及棉花耗水和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(11):113-120. |
Zumilaiti Tuergan, LIN Tao, YAN Changrong, et al. Effect of plastic film mulching duration on soil temperature and moisture in field and cotton water consumption and yield in Xinjiang[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(11):113-120. | |
[7] | 韩俊伟, 赵文团, 唐震超, 等. 棉花头水前揭膜试验研究[J]. 中国种业, 2017,(2):59-60. |
HAN Junwei, ZHAO Wentuan, TANG Zhenchao, et al. Experimental study on uncovering film of cotton before watering[J]. China Seed Industry, 2017,(2):59-60. | |
[8] | 汤建. 膜下滴灌揭膜及残膜回收探讨[J]. 现代农业科技, 2014,(8):185-193. |
TANG Jian. Discussion on film uncovering and residual film recovery in drip irrigation under mulch[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014,(8):185-193. | |
[9] | 严昌荣, 何文清, 刘恩科, 等. 作物地膜覆盖安全期概念和估算方法探讨[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(9):1-4. |
YAN Changrong, HE Wenqing, LIU Enke, et al. Concept and estimation of crop safety period of plastic film mulching[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(9):1-4. | |
[10] | 吴军虎, 陶汪海, 赵伟, 等. 微咸水膜下滴灌不同灌水量对水盐运移和棉花生长的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3):272-276. |
WU Junhu, TAO Wanghai, ZHAO Wei, et al. Impact of different irrigation amount of light saline water drip irrigation under mulch on water-salt transport and cotton growth[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(3):272-276. | |
[11] | 李君, 吕军, 刘晓伟, 等. 揭膜时期对土壤水、盐运移及棉花产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2016, 25(9):1327-1332. |
LI Jun, LÜ Jun, LIU Xiaowei, et al. Effects of different uncovering plastic film periods on water use efficiency, soil salinity and yield of cotton[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2016, 25(9):1327-1332. | |
[12] | 李生秀, 张占琴, 魏建军. 不同覆膜方式对棉花生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2010, 47(6):1218-1223. |
LI Shengxiu, ZHANG Zhanqin, WEI Jianjun. Effects of Different Ways of Film Mulching on Cotton Growth[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 47(6):1218-1223. | |
[13] | 肖俊夫, 刘祖贵, 俞希根, 等. 滴灌条件下不同供水模式对棉花产量及品质的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2000,(4):194-197. |
XIAO Junfu, LIU Zugui, YU Xigen, et al. Effects of Different Water Application on Lint Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton under Drip Irrigation[J]. Cotton Science, 2000,(4):194-197. | |
[14] | 孙雯艳, 孙粉珍. 干旱胁迫对棉花干物质积累及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2015, 38(8):3-5. |
SUN Wenyan, SUN Fenzhen. Effects of drought stress on dry matter accumulation and yield of cotton[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2015, 38(8):3-5. | |
[15] | 张伟, 吕新, 朱芸, 等. 不同灌水量下新疆高产棉花冠层结构分析研究及产量初报[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2005, 42(2):77-82. |
ZHANG Wei, LÜ Xin, ZHU Yun, et al. Study on cotton canopy structure factor image analysis in high- yield cotton of Xinjiang at different irrigation[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 42(2):77-82. | |
[16] | 罗宏海, 张亚黎, 张旺锋, 等. 新疆滴灌棉花花铃期干旱复水对叶片光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008,(1):171-174. |
LUO Honghai, ZHANG Yali, ZHANG Wangfeng, et al. Effects of rewatering after drought stress on photosynjournal and yield during flowering and boll-setting stage of cotton under-mulch-drip irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,(1):171-174. | |
[17] | 李淦, 高丽丽, 康正华, 等. 不同灌水处理对机采棉干物质和氮素运移及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(4):353-360. |
LI Gan, GAO Lili, KANG Zhenghua, et al. Effects of Different Water Treatments on Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen Migration and Production of Machine-Harvested Cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(4):353-360. | |
[18] | 白鹏, 冉春艳, 谢小玉. 干旱胁迫对油菜蕾薹期生理特性及农艺性状的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014,(18):3566-3576. |
BAI Peng, RAN Chunyan, XIE Xiaoyu. Influence of drought stress on physiological characteristics and agronomic traits at bud stage of rapeseed[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014,(18):3566-3576. | |
[19] |
郑巨云, 王俊铎, 龚照龙, 等. 花铃期干旱胁迫对不同棉花品种光合作用影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2017, 54(12):2190-2197.
DOI |
ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, GONG Zhaolong, et al. Photosynthetic Characteristics of Different Cotton Varity under Drought Stress during Flowering and Boll-setting Stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 54(12):2190-2197. | |
[20] | 田又升, 范术丽, 庞朝友, 等. 全生育期干旱胁迫对棉花形态、生理、光合作用和产量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(5):224-231. |
TIAN Yousheng, FAN Shuli, PANG Chaoyou, et al. Effects of Drought Stress in the Whole Period on Cotton Morphology, Physiology, Photosynjournal and Yield[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-sinica, 2017, 32(5):224-231. | |
[21] | 李磐. 不同灌溉量对长绒棉产量的影响[J]. 干旱区研究, 2008,(5):695-699. |
LI Pan. Effects of Different Irrigation Volumes on Cotton Yield in Arid Areas[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2008,(5):695-699. | |
[22] | 罗宏海, 赵瑞海, 杨新军, 等. 高产棉花叶面积载荷量与光合生产的关系及对冠层结构的影响[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 29(1):6-10. |
LUO Honghai, ZHAO Ruihai, YANG Xinjun, et al. The Relationship of Sink Capacity of Unit Leaf Area to Photosynthetic Production and Its Regulation Effect on Canopy Structure in High-Yield Cotton[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2011, 29(1):6-10. | |
[23] | 雷在新. 膜下滴灌条件下不同灌水量对棉花生长和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 甘肃水利水电技术, 2012, 48(4):46-47,65. |
LEI Zaixin. Effects of different irrigation amount on cotton growth and water use efficiency under drip irrigation under film[J]. Gansu Water Conservancy and Hydropower Technology, 2012, 48(4):46-47,65. |
[1] | ZHOU Xin, LIU Xuanfeng, JIANG Yuhan, ZHANG Haichun, YANG Yuxin, Yeerbdati Tiemuer, JIANG Yongxin, ZHANG Li. Current situation and development proposal of mechanized recovery and resource utilization of used mulch film in cotton fields in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 131-141. |
[2] | MIAO Hongping, WANG Xiaowei, TIAN Conghua, LI Zhi, ZHANG Yuxin, DAI Junsheng. Evolution characteristics and driving factors of cotton production and distribution in Tarim River basin [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 217-226. |
[3] | WANG Junduo, CUI Yujiang, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Junyun, LI Xueyuan. Xinjiang cotton production advantageous regional layout scheme [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 60-69. |
[4] | ZHENG Juyun, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, GENG Shiwei, SUN Fenglei, YANG ni, LI Xueyuan, WANG Junduo. Key technology model of machine-picked cotton production in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 70-74. |
[5] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[6] | LI Jie, LIU Jia, WANG Liang, ZHANG Na, YANG Yanlong, ZHENG Zipiao, WEI Xin, WANG Meng, ZHOU Zixin, YANG Ni, GONG Zhaolong, HOU Xianfei, HUANG Qixiu, Abudukadier kuerban, ZHANG Jipeng, CHANG Pengzhong. Current situation of transformation and application of scientific and technological achievements of "cotton, oil and sugar" [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 89-94. |
[7] | BIAN Qingyong, FU Yanbo, QI Tong, HUANG Jian, PU Shenghai, MENG Ajing, Halihashi Yibati. Study on influencing factors of cotton emergence and protection measures in saline-alkali land in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 95-100. |
[8] | LI Yongtai, GAO Axiang, LI Yanjun, ZHANG Xinyu. Effects of defoliants on the physiological characteristics of cotton varieties with different sensitivities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2094-2102. |
[9] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[10] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[11] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[12] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[13] | ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276. |
[14] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[15] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 56
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||