Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 847-856.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.008
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Guangwei1(), HAN Dengxu2, ZHU Qi1, ZHANG Shaomin1()
Received:
2022-07-31
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
ZHANG Shaomin(1979-),male,Chenggu,Shanxi,China,Associate Researcher,Ph.D.,Research field is crop nutrient management and rhizosphere regulation, (E-mail)Supported by:
通讯作者:
张少民(1979-),男,陕西城固人,副研究员,博士,研究方向为作物养分管理及根际调控,(E-mail)作者简介:
周广威(1990-),男,河南平舆人,助理研究员,研究方向为作物养分高效利用及植物营养生理生态,(E-mail)zgw024@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHOU Guangwei, HAN Dengxu, ZHU Qi, ZHANG Shaomin. Screening of spring maize genotypes tolerant to low-phosphorus and their phosphorus efficiency in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 847-856.
周广威, 韩登旭, 朱琦, 张少民. 耐低磷新疆春玉米基因型筛选及其磷效率[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 847-856.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.008
处理 Treatment | 地上部干重 Shoot dry biomass (g/plant) | 分配比例 Biomass distribution proportion (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ | 合计 Total | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 131.00±11.09b | 108.97±3.63b | 239.97±14.72b | 54.54±1.24a | 45.46±1.24d |
新玉29号 | 51.20±6.73d | 96.72±11.30bcd | 147.91±15.71d | 34.63±2.77c | 65.37±2.77b | |
新玉47号 | 42.21±0.47def | 105.54±12.28bc | 147.75±12.54d | 28.70±2.25d | 71.30±2.25a | |
新玉54号 | 46.59±5.51de | 98.04±12.59bcd | 144.62±8.48d | 32.38±5.11cd | 67.62±5.11ab | |
新玉69号 | 70.82±5.82c | 98.60±3.34bcd | 169.41±8.46c | 41.76±1.60b | 58.24±1.60c | |
新玉80号 | 36.82±5.41ef | 88.94±8.29cd | 125.76±7.93e | 29.30±4.32cd | 70.70±4.32ab | |
新玉102号 | 48.71±0.96de | 106.45±9.84b | 155.16±8.91cd | 31.48±2.33cd | 68.52±2.33ab | |
新玉110号 | 30.44±2.00f | 82.16±8.74d | 112.59±10.00e | 27.10±1.70d | 72.90±1.70a | |
郑单958 | 160.35±13.47a | 130.00±6.56a | 290.35±7.04a | 55.17±3.28a | 44.83±3.28d | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 53.24±7.49b | 49.97±3.19cd | 103.21±7.98c | 51.44±4.09a | 48.56±4.09d |
新玉29号 | 24.99±3.81d | 61.45±6.48bc | 86.44±9.87d | 28.86±1.79c | 71.14±1.79b | |
新玉47号 | 38.54±4.55c | 93.38±12.63a | 131.92±14.20b | 29.33±3.57c | 70.67±3.57b | |
新玉54号 | 37.32±5.89c | 89.75±8.29a | 127.07±4.34b | 29.42±4.96c | 70.58±4.96b | |
新玉69号 | 67.67±10.42a | 99.42±3.41a | 167.09±10.01a | 40.35±4.10b | 59.65±4.10c | |
新玉80号 | 17.10±2.08d | 59.55±6.29bcd | 76.65±8.27de | 22.30±0.74d | 77.70±0.74a | |
新玉102号 | 17.70±3.15d | 50.13±7.61cd | 67.83±10.73e | 26.05±0.70cd | 73.95±0.70ab | |
新玉110号 | 19.61±2.28d | 47.94±6.39d | 67.55±7.61e | 29.10±2.89c | 70.90±2.89b | |
郑单958 | 72.10±4.34a | 66.51±3.92b | 138.61±2.75b | 52.01±2.78a | 47.99±2.78d |
Tab.1 The accumulation and distribution of dry matter weight in maize under low and normal phosphorus levels
处理 Treatment | 地上部干重 Shoot dry biomass (g/plant) | 分配比例 Biomass distribution proportion (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ | 合计 Total | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 131.00±11.09b | 108.97±3.63b | 239.97±14.72b | 54.54±1.24a | 45.46±1.24d |
新玉29号 | 51.20±6.73d | 96.72±11.30bcd | 147.91±15.71d | 34.63±2.77c | 65.37±2.77b | |
新玉47号 | 42.21±0.47def | 105.54±12.28bc | 147.75±12.54d | 28.70±2.25d | 71.30±2.25a | |
新玉54号 | 46.59±5.51de | 98.04±12.59bcd | 144.62±8.48d | 32.38±5.11cd | 67.62±5.11ab | |
新玉69号 | 70.82±5.82c | 98.60±3.34bcd | 169.41±8.46c | 41.76±1.60b | 58.24±1.60c | |
新玉80号 | 36.82±5.41ef | 88.94±8.29cd | 125.76±7.93e | 29.30±4.32cd | 70.70±4.32ab | |
新玉102号 | 48.71±0.96de | 106.45±9.84b | 155.16±8.91cd | 31.48±2.33cd | 68.52±2.33ab | |
新玉110号 | 30.44±2.00f | 82.16±8.74d | 112.59±10.00e | 27.10±1.70d | 72.90±1.70a | |
郑单958 | 160.35±13.47a | 130.00±6.56a | 290.35±7.04a | 55.17±3.28a | 44.83±3.28d | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 53.24±7.49b | 49.97±3.19cd | 103.21±7.98c | 51.44±4.09a | 48.56±4.09d |
新玉29号 | 24.99±3.81d | 61.45±6.48bc | 86.44±9.87d | 28.86±1.79c | 71.14±1.79b | |
新玉47号 | 38.54±4.55c | 93.38±12.63a | 131.92±14.20b | 29.33±3.57c | 70.67±3.57b | |
新玉54号 | 37.32±5.89c | 89.75±8.29a | 127.07±4.34b | 29.42±4.96c | 70.58±4.96b | |
新玉69号 | 67.67±10.42a | 99.42±3.41a | 167.09±10.01a | 40.35±4.10b | 59.65±4.10c | |
新玉80号 | 17.10±2.08d | 59.55±6.29bcd | 76.65±8.27de | 22.30±0.74d | 77.70±0.74a | |
新玉102号 | 17.70±3.15d | 50.13±7.61cd | 67.83±10.73e | 26.05±0.70cd | 73.95±0.70ab | |
新玉110号 | 19.61±2.28d | 47.94±6.39d | 67.55±7.61e | 29.10±2.89c | 70.90±2.89b | |
郑单958 | 72.10±4.34a | 66.51±3.92b | 138.61±2.75b | 52.01±2.78a | 47.99±2.78d |
处理 Treatment | 氮素累积量 N accumulation (mg/plant) | 分配比例 N distribution proportion (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ | 合计 Total | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 654.76±36.80b | 901.80±92.07d | 1 556.56±128.85c | 42.13±1.11a | 57.87±1.11e |
新玉29号 | 272.45±30.28e | 947.75±107.75d | 1 220.20±137.03d | 22.33±0.54cd | 77.67±0.54bc | |
新玉47号 | 365.29±8.43cd | 1 437.50±161.02ab | 1 802.79±168.86b | 20.35±1.49d | 79.65±1.49b | |
新玉54号 | 420.14±49.63c | 1 276.24±167.86bc | 1 696.38±128.66bc | 24.97±4.41c | 75.03±4.41c | |
新玉69号 | 604.06±48.17b | 1 210.65±16.98c | 1 814.72±59.54b | 33.25±1.64b | 66.75±1.64d | |
新玉80号 | 241.76±46.28e | 1 297.22±40.72bc | 1 538.98±39.42c | 15.69±2.84e | 84.31±2.84a | |
新玉102号 | 321.57±7.64de | 1 437.33±153.31ab | 1 758.90±160.93bc | 18.36±1.19de | 81.64±1.19ab | |
新玉110号 | 252.00±38.39e | 1 318.89±83.72bc | 1 570.89±112.37c | 16.00±1.58e | 84.00±1.58a | |
郑单958 | 1155.61±84.86a | 1 630.66±90.13a | 2 786.27±20.36a | 41.48±3.11a | 58.52±3.11e | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 435.99±97.41ab | 639.03±42.21cd | 1 075.02±58.91b | 40.31±6.96a | 59.69±6.96a |
新玉29号 | 201.12±40.55cd | 792.93±52.87bc | 994.05±91.61bc | 20.11±2.20b | 79.89±2.20c | |
新玉47号 | 382.96±31.69b | 1 227.93±125.81a | 1 610.89±106.13a | 23.89±3.22b | 76.11±3.22c | |
新玉54号 | 276.92±35.44c | 1 225.18±149.13a | 1 502.10±114.41a | 18.62±3.75b | 81.38±3.75c | |
新玉69号 | 501.00±51.24a | 1 132.70±66.68a | 1 633.70±67.76a | 30.67±2.95b | 69.33±2.95b | |
新玉80号 | 122.77±15.08d | 847.54±102.86b | 970.31±110.71bc | 12.69±1.31d | 87.31±1.31d | |
新玉102号 | 162.62±14.94d | 689.90±97.49bcd | 852.52±110.41cd | 19.16±1.35b | 80.84±1.35c | |
新玉110号 | 156.93±17.23d | 577.67±63.52d | 734.61±70.69cd | 21.41±2.27b | 78.59±2.27c | |
郑单958 | 398.11±38.18b | 697.91±50.71bcd | 1 096.02±87.11b | 36.30±0.99a | 63.70±0.99a |
Tab.2 The N accumulation of maize under low and normal phosphorus levels
处理 Treatment | 氮素累积量 N accumulation (mg/plant) | 分配比例 N distribution proportion (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ | 合计 Total | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 654.76±36.80b | 901.80±92.07d | 1 556.56±128.85c | 42.13±1.11a | 57.87±1.11e |
新玉29号 | 272.45±30.28e | 947.75±107.75d | 1 220.20±137.03d | 22.33±0.54cd | 77.67±0.54bc | |
新玉47号 | 365.29±8.43cd | 1 437.50±161.02ab | 1 802.79±168.86b | 20.35±1.49d | 79.65±1.49b | |
新玉54号 | 420.14±49.63c | 1 276.24±167.86bc | 1 696.38±128.66bc | 24.97±4.41c | 75.03±4.41c | |
新玉69号 | 604.06±48.17b | 1 210.65±16.98c | 1 814.72±59.54b | 33.25±1.64b | 66.75±1.64d | |
新玉80号 | 241.76±46.28e | 1 297.22±40.72bc | 1 538.98±39.42c | 15.69±2.84e | 84.31±2.84a | |
新玉102号 | 321.57±7.64de | 1 437.33±153.31ab | 1 758.90±160.93bc | 18.36±1.19de | 81.64±1.19ab | |
新玉110号 | 252.00±38.39e | 1 318.89±83.72bc | 1 570.89±112.37c | 16.00±1.58e | 84.00±1.58a | |
郑单958 | 1155.61±84.86a | 1 630.66±90.13a | 2 786.27±20.36a | 41.48±3.11a | 58.52±3.11e | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 435.99±97.41ab | 639.03±42.21cd | 1 075.02±58.91b | 40.31±6.96a | 59.69±6.96a |
新玉29号 | 201.12±40.55cd | 792.93±52.87bc | 994.05±91.61bc | 20.11±2.20b | 79.89±2.20c | |
新玉47号 | 382.96±31.69b | 1 227.93±125.81a | 1 610.89±106.13a | 23.89±3.22b | 76.11±3.22c | |
新玉54号 | 276.92±35.44c | 1 225.18±149.13a | 1 502.10±114.41a | 18.62±3.75b | 81.38±3.75c | |
新玉69号 | 501.00±51.24a | 1 132.70±66.68a | 1 633.70±67.76a | 30.67±2.95b | 69.33±2.95b | |
新玉80号 | 122.77±15.08d | 847.54±102.86b | 970.31±110.71bc | 12.69±1.31d | 87.31±1.31d | |
新玉102号 | 162.62±14.94d | 689.90±97.49bcd | 852.52±110.41cd | 19.16±1.35b | 80.84±1.35c | |
新玉110号 | 156.93±17.23d | 577.67±63.52d | 734.61±70.69cd | 21.41±2.27b | 78.59±2.27c | |
郑单958 | 398.11±38.18b | 697.91±50.71bcd | 1 096.02±87.11b | 36.30±0.99a | 63.70±0.99a |
处理 Treatment | 磷素累积量 P accumulation (mg/plant) | 分配比例 P distribution proportion (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ | 合计 Total | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 19.92±0.19cd | 193.60±4.58c | 213.49±4.46c | 9.33±0.26bc | 90.67±0.26ab |
新玉29号 | 32.72±4.47bc | 290.26±29.95b | 322.98±27.28b | 10.22±1.93b | 89.78±1.93b | |
新玉47号 | 24.38±1.87cd | 388.02±16.58a | 412.40±16.65a | 5.92±0.49c | 94.08±0.49a | |
新玉54号 | 43.73±6.14b | 392.25±39.56a | 435.99±35.31a | 10.12±1.97b | 89.88±1.97b | |
新玉69号 | 156.62±18.84a | 248.82±15.35b | 405.43±24.91a | 38.57±3.15a | 61.43±3.15c | |
新玉80号 | 21.67±4.99cd | 170.81±28.71c | 192.48±31.21c | 11.28±2.28b | 88.72±2.28b | |
新玉102号 | 15.83±2.36cd | 181.35±19.43c | 197.18±19.65c | 8.07±1.29bc | 91.93±1.29ab | |
新玉110号 | 11.32±2.67d | 175.79±30.44c | 187.11±32.59c | 6.04±0.91c | 93.96±0.91a | |
郑单958 | 166.98±19.63a | 271.97±33.89b | 438.94±38.28a | 38.10±4.15a | 61.90±4.15c | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 38.36±4.34b | 130.92±8.55c | 169.28±9.72bcd | 22.66±2.19b | 77.34±2.19e |
新玉29号 | 4.66±0.36e | 156.94±26.08bc | 161.60±26.09cd | 2.94±0.56ef | 97.06±0.56ab | |
新玉47号 | 5.11±0.99e | 184.79±19.44b | 189.90±18.82bc | 2.73±0.76f | 97.27±0.76a | |
新玉54号 | 8.12±0.72e | 190.21±28.36ab | 198.33±27.65b | 4.19±1.02ef | 95.81±1.02ab | |
新玉69号 | 20.90±4.25c | 221.45±6.24a | 242.35±8.09a | 8.61±1.59d | 91.39±1.59c | |
新玉80号 | 8.71±1.09de | 136.41±20.17c | 145.12±21.03d | 6.03±0.50de | 93.97±0.50bc | |
新玉102号 | 8.12±0.28e | 141.18±25.92c | 149.29±25.83d | 5.56±1.10ef | 94.44±1.10ab | |
新玉110号 | 13.83±1.97d | 96.72±9.77d | 110.55±10.63e | 12.53±1.58c | 87.47±1.58d | |
郑单958 | 45.39±6.35a | 123.36±7.94cd | 168.75±7.38bcd | 26.89±3.46a | 73.11±3.46f |
Tab.3 The P accumulation of maize under low and normal phosphorus levels
处理 Treatment | 磷素累积量 P accumulation (mg/plant) | 分配比例 P distribution proportion (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ | 合计 Total | 营养器官 Vegetative organ | 生殖器官 Reproductive organ |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 19.92±0.19cd | 193.60±4.58c | 213.49±4.46c | 9.33±0.26bc | 90.67±0.26ab |
新玉29号 | 32.72±4.47bc | 290.26±29.95b | 322.98±27.28b | 10.22±1.93b | 89.78±1.93b | |
新玉47号 | 24.38±1.87cd | 388.02±16.58a | 412.40±16.65a | 5.92±0.49c | 94.08±0.49a | |
新玉54号 | 43.73±6.14b | 392.25±39.56a | 435.99±35.31a | 10.12±1.97b | 89.88±1.97b | |
新玉69号 | 156.62±18.84a | 248.82±15.35b | 405.43±24.91a | 38.57±3.15a | 61.43±3.15c | |
新玉80号 | 21.67±4.99cd | 170.81±28.71c | 192.48±31.21c | 11.28±2.28b | 88.72±2.28b | |
新玉102号 | 15.83±2.36cd | 181.35±19.43c | 197.18±19.65c | 8.07±1.29bc | 91.93±1.29ab | |
新玉110号 | 11.32±2.67d | 175.79±30.44c | 187.11±32.59c | 6.04±0.91c | 93.96±0.91a | |
郑单958 | 166.98±19.63a | 271.97±33.89b | 438.94±38.28a | 38.10±4.15a | 61.90±4.15c | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 38.36±4.34b | 130.92±8.55c | 169.28±9.72bcd | 22.66±2.19b | 77.34±2.19e |
新玉29号 | 4.66±0.36e | 156.94±26.08bc | 161.60±26.09cd | 2.94±0.56ef | 97.06±0.56ab | |
新玉47号 | 5.11±0.99e | 184.79±19.44b | 189.90±18.82bc | 2.73±0.76f | 97.27±0.76a | |
新玉54号 | 8.12±0.72e | 190.21±28.36ab | 198.33±27.65b | 4.19±1.02ef | 95.81±1.02ab | |
新玉69号 | 20.90±4.25c | 221.45±6.24a | 242.35±8.09a | 8.61±1.59d | 91.39±1.59c | |
新玉80号 | 8.71±1.09de | 136.41±20.17c | 145.12±21.03d | 6.03±0.50de | 93.97±0.50bc | |
新玉102号 | 8.12±0.28e | 141.18±25.92c | 149.29±25.83d | 5.56±1.10ef | 94.44±1.10ab | |
新玉110号 | 13.83±1.97d | 96.72±9.77d | 110.55±10.63e | 12.53±1.58c | 87.47±1.58d | |
郑单958 | 45.39±6.35a | 123.36±7.94cd | 168.75±7.38bcd | 26.89±3.46a | 73.11±3.46f |
处理 Treatment | 单株产量 Yield (g/plant) | |
---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 61.48±5.02c |
新玉29号 | 72.37±6.79bc | |
新玉47号 | 83.18±9.67ab | |
新玉54号 | 73.95±14.42bc | |
新玉69号 | 73.69±4.26bc | |
新玉80号 | 73.82±9.05bc | |
新玉102号 | 84.90±5.81ab | |
新玉110号 | 66.68±762c | |
郑单958 | 88.99±2.13a | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 36.92±0.51bc |
新玉29号 | 47.80±6.27b | |
新玉47号 | 70.68±8.99a | |
新玉54号 | 68.64±9.80a | |
新玉69号 | 71.27±4.33a | |
新玉80号 | 47.24±7.26b | |
新玉102号 | 39.72±5.27bc | |
新玉110号 | 38.32±5.76bc | |
郑单958 | 30.60±1.19c |
Tab.4 The yield per plant of maize under low and normal phosphorus levels
处理 Treatment | 单株产量 Yield (g/plant) | |
---|---|---|
施磷量 Phosphorus rate | 基因型 Genotype | |
正常磷 Normal P | 新玉24号 | 61.48±5.02c |
新玉29号 | 72.37±6.79bc | |
新玉47号 | 83.18±9.67ab | |
新玉54号 | 73.95±14.42bc | |
新玉69号 | 73.69±4.26bc | |
新玉80号 | 73.82±9.05bc | |
新玉102号 | 84.90±5.81ab | |
新玉110号 | 66.68±762c | |
郑单958 | 88.99±2.13a | |
低磷 Low P | 新玉24号 | 36.92±0.51bc |
新玉29号 | 47.80±6.27b | |
新玉47号 | 70.68±8.99a | |
新玉54号 | 68.64±9.80a | |
新玉69号 | 71.27±4.33a | |
新玉80号 | 47.24±7.26b | |
新玉102号 | 39.72±5.27bc | |
新玉110号 | 38.32±5.76bc | |
郑单958 | 30.60±1.19c |
基因型 Genotype | 地上部干重 Shoot dry biomass | 单株籽 粒产量 Yield | 全株磷 累积量 P accumulation | 全株氮 累积量 N accumulation |
---|---|---|---|---|
新玉24号 Xinyu 24 | 0.43 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.82 |
新玉47号 Xinyu 47 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.46 | 0.90 |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.89 |
新玉69号 Xinyu 69 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 0.90 |
新玉80号 Xinyu 80 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.63 |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.49 |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.47 |
郑单958 Zhengdan 958 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
Tab.5 Relative values of each characteristics under different phosphorus levels
基因型 Genotype | 地上部干重 Shoot dry biomass | 单株籽 粒产量 Yield | 全株磷 累积量 P accumulation | 全株氮 累积量 N accumulation |
---|---|---|---|---|
新玉24号 Xinyu 24 | 0.43 | 0.60 | 0.79 | 0.69 |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.82 |
新玉47号 Xinyu 47 | 0.89 | 0.85 | 0.46 | 0.90 |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.89 |
新玉69号 Xinyu 69 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 0.90 |
新玉80号 Xinyu 80 | 0.61 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 0.63 |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.75 | 0.49 |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.61 | 0.47 |
郑单958 Zhengdan 958 | 0.48 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.39 |
基因型 Genotype | 正常磷 Normal P | 低磷 Low P |
---|---|---|
新玉24号Xinyu 24 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
新玉29号Xinyu 29 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
新玉47号Xinyu 47 | 0.14 | 0.20 |
新玉54号Xinyu 54 | 0.13 | 0.20 |
新玉69号Xinyu 69 | 0.13 | 0.25 |
新玉80号Xinyu 80 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
新玉102号Xinyu 102 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
新玉110号Xinyu 110 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
郑单958 Zhengdan 958 | 0.25 | 0.08 |
Tab.6 Comprehensive value of P efficiency under low and high P levels
基因型 Genotype | 正常磷 Normal P | 低磷 Low P |
---|---|---|
新玉24号Xinyu 24 | 0.08 | 0.09 |
新玉29号Xinyu 29 | 0.07 | 0.08 |
新玉47号Xinyu 47 | 0.14 | 0.20 |
新玉54号Xinyu 54 | 0.13 | 0.20 |
新玉69号Xinyu 69 | 0.13 | 0.25 |
新玉80号Xinyu 80 | 0.03 | 0.07 |
新玉102号Xinyu 102 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
新玉110号Xinyu 110 | 0.02 | 0.02 |
郑单958 Zhengdan 958 | 0.25 | 0.08 |
[1] | 张家铜, 彭正萍, 李婷, 等. 不同供氮水平对玉米体内干物质和氮动态积累与分配的影响[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2009, 32(2): 1-5. |
ZHANG Jiatong, PENG Zhengping, LI Ting, et al. Effects of different N application rates on the dynamic accumulation and distribution of assimilate and N content in maize[J]. Journal of Agricultural University of Hebei, 2009, 32(2): 1-5. | |
[2] | 新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年鉴[J]. 北京:中国统计出版社出版, 2019. |
Statistic Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook[J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019. | |
[3] | 王庆仁, 李继云, 李振声. 高效利用土壤磷素的植物营养学研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 5(3): 417-421. |
WANG Qinren, LI Jiyun, LI Zhensheng. Studies on plant nutrition of efficient utility for soil phosphorus[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 5(3): 417-421. | |
[4] | 陆景陵. 植物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1995. |
LU Jinling. Plant Nutrition[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 1995. | |
[5] |
Ramaekers L, Remans R, Rao I M, Blair M W, Vanderleyden J. Strategies for improving phosphorus acquisition efficiency of crop plants[J]. Field Crops Research, 2010, 117(2-3):169-176.
DOI URL |
[6] |
Martinez V, Bernstein N, Läuchli A. Salt-induced inhibition of phosphorus transport in lettuce plants[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 1996, 97(1):118-122.
DOI URL |
[7] | Grattan, S R, Grieve C M. Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 1998, (78):127-157. |
[8] | Grattan S R, Grieve C M. Mineral nutrient acquisition and response by plants grown in saline environments[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 1992, (2):203-226. |
[9] | 张皓禹, 孟超然, 张凤麟, 等. 新疆北疆地区磷肥不同基追比例对滴灌玉米养分吸收和产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(1): 138-145. |
ZHANG Haoyu, MENG Chaoran, ZHANG Fenglin, et al. Effects of Different Base-Topdressing Ratios of Phosphate Fertilizer on Nutrient Uptake and Yield of Maize under Drip Irrigation in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2021, 29(1): 138-145. | |
[10] | 李志刚, 谢甫绨, 宋书宏, 等. 作物不同基因型的磷素营养研究进展[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, (4): 307-312. |
LI Zhigang, XIE Futi, SONG Shuhong, et al. On research progress of different crops genotypes phosphorus nutrition[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, 2002,(4): 307-312. | |
[11] | 史向远, 王秀红, 韩彦青, 等. 玉米耐低磷基因型的筛选[J]. 山西农业科学, 2012, 40(3): 217-220, 223. |
SHI Xiangyuan, WANG Xiuhong, HAN Yanqing, et al. Genotypes selection on tolerance to low phosphorus stress in maize[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(3): 217-220, 223. | |
[12] | 王庆仁, 李继云, 李振声. 植物高效利用土壤难溶态磷研究动态及展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998,(2): 107-116. |
WANG Qinren, LI Jiyun, LI Zhensheng. Dynamics and prospect on studies of high acquisiton of soil unavailable phosphorus by plants[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 1998,(2): 107-116. | |
[13] | 王文华, 范婷婷, 罗兰艳, 等. 甘蓝型油菜不同磷效率品种根系形态及生理特性的研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011,(4): 26-29. |
WANG Wenhua, FAN Tingting, LUO Lanyan, et al. Study on the morphological and physiological characteristic of roots with different P efficiency[J]. Soil and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2011,(4): 26-29. | |
[14] |
Gaume A, Mächler F, De León C, et al. Low-P tolerance by maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes: significance of root growth, and organic acids and acid phosphatase root exudation[J]. Plant and Soil, 2001, 228(2): 253-264.
DOI URL |
[15] |
Liu Y, Mi G, Chen F, Zhang J, et al. Rhizosphere effect and root growth of two maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes with contrasting P efficiency at low P availability[J]. Plant Science, 2004, 167(2): 217-223.
DOI URL |
[16] |
阳显斌, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等. 小麦磷素利用效率的品种差异[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(1): 60-66.
PMID |
YANG Xianbin, ZHANG Xizhou, LI Tingxuan, et al. Differences in phosphorus utilization efficiency among wheat cultivars[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(1): 60-66.
PMID |
|
[17] | 李春艳, 马龙, 张宏, 等. 新疆冬小麦苗期耐低磷指标的筛选[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2013, 33(11): 137-140. |
LI Chunyan, MA Long, ZHANG Hong, et al. Screening on indexes for tolerance to low phosphorus stress at seeding stage of winter wheat[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2013, 33(11): 137-140. | |
[18] | 龚江, 李绍长, 夏春兰, 等. 低磷胁迫下玉米自交系磷高效基因型筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2002, 39(2): 77-81. |
GONG Jiang, LI Shaochang, XIA Chunlan, et al. Selection of maize inbred for high phosphate efficiency in Low phosphate stress[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2002, 39(2): 77-81. | |
[19] | 刘向生, 陈范骏, 春亮, 等. 玉米自交系耐低磷胁迫的基因型差异[J]. 玉米科学, 2003,(3): 23-27. |
LIU Xiangsheng, CHEN Fanjun, CHUN Liang, et al. Genotypic difference of maize inbred lines in tolerance to phosphorus deficiency[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2003,(3): 23-27. | |
[20] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
BAO Shidan. Soil Agrochemical Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. | |
[21] | 刘露露, 汪军成, 姚立蓉, 等. 不同春小麦品种耐低磷性评价及种质筛选[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28(7): 999-1009. |
LIU Lulu, WANG Juncheng, YAO Lirong, et al. Evaluation of low phosphorus tolerance and germplasm screening of spring wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2020, 28(7): 999-1009. | |
[22] | 钟思荣, 陈仁霄, 陶瑶, 等. 耐低氮烟草基因型的筛选及其氮效率类型[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(7): 993-1002. |
ZHONG Sirong, CHEN Renxiao, TAO Yao, et al. Screening of Tobacco Genotypes Tolerant to Low-Nitrogen and Their Nitrogen Efficiency Types[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(7): 993-1002.
DOI URL |
|
[23] | 冯二静. 甜糯玉米耐低磷品种筛选及其生理机制研究[D]. 广州: 广东海洋大学, 2014. |
FENG Renjing. Screening and physiological mechanisms of sweet-waxy maize varieties with resistant low-phosphorus[D]. Guangzhou: Guangdong Ocean University, 2014. | |
[24] | Alvaro E S, Gabelman W H. Screening maize inbred lines for tolerance to low-P stress condition[J]. Plant and Soil, 1992, (146): 181-187. |
[25] |
马祥庆, 梁霞. 植物高效利用磷机制的研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004,(4): 712-716.
PMID |
MA Xiangqing, LIANG Xia. Research advances in mechanism of high phosphorus use efficiency of plants[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004,(4): 712-716.
PMID |
|
[26] | 姚启伦. 玉米地方品种耐低磷性状苗期筛选指标研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,(1): 125-130. |
YAO Qilun. Studies on screening indexes of maize landraces for low-P intolerant traits at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Ed.), 2008,(1): 125-130. | |
[27] | 袁硕, 彭正萍, 沙晓晴, 等. 玉米杂交种对缺磷反应的生理机制及基因型差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1): 51-58. |
YUAN Shuo, PENG Zhengping, SHA Xiaoqing, et al. Physiological mechanism of maize hybrids in response to P deficiency and differences among cultivars[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(1): 51-58. | |
[28] | 李俊, 张春雷, 秦岭, 等. 不同磷效率基因型油菜对低磷胁迫的生理响应[J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(2): 222-228, 234. |
LI Jun, ZHANG Chunlei, QIN Ling, et al. Physiological response to low phosphorus stress for different P-efficiency genotype of rapeseed[J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2010, 32(2): 222-228, 234. | |
[29] | 邱双, 闫双堆, 刘利军. 不同谷子品种耐低磷能力研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 139-144. |
QIU Shuang, YAN Shuangdui, LIU Lijun. Tolerance to low phosphorus by different foxtail millet varieties[J]. Crops, 2017(2): 139-144. | |
[30] | 龚丝雨, 梁喜欢, 钟思荣, 等. 苗期耐低磷烟草基因型筛选及其磷效率[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4): 661-670. |
GONG Siyu, LIANG Xihuan, ZHONG Sirong, et al. Screening of tobacco genotypes tolerant to low-phosphorus and their phosphorus efficiency at tobacco seedling stage[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(4): 661-670. | |
[31] |
颜晓军, 叶德练, 苏达, 等. 磷肥用量对甜玉米磷素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(1): 169-176.
DOI |
YAN Xiaojun, YE Delian, SU Da, et al. Effects of phosphorus application on phosphorus uptake and utilization of sweet corn[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinca, 2021, 47(1): 169-176. | |
[32] | 彭正萍, 张家铜, 袁硕, 等. 不同供磷水平对玉米干物质和磷动态积累及分配的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(4): 793-798. |
PENG Zhengping, ZHANG Jiatong, YUAN Shuo, et al. Effects of different phosphrus application rates on the dynamic accumulation and distribution of dry matter and phosphrus in maize[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(4): 793-798. | |
[33] | 张晗菡, 魏清岗, 穆春华, 等. 玉米应答低磷胁迫机制研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(6): 175-180. |
ZHANG Hanhan, WEI Qinggang, MU Chunhua, et al. Advances in research on mechanism of response to low phosphorus stress in maize[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(6): 175-180. | |
[34] | 杨瑞吉, 张小红, 王鹤龄, 等. 不同基因型春小麦对磷胁迫适应性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2005, 25(11): 2314-2318. |
YANG Ruiji, ZHANG Xiaohong, WANG Heling, et al. Adaptabil ities of different genotypes of spring wheat to phosphorous deficiency[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinca, 2005, 25(11): 2314-2318. | |
[35] |
陈海英, 余海英, 陈光登, 等. 低磷胁迫下磷高效基因型大麦的根系形态特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(10): 3020-3026.
PMID |
CHEN Haiying, YU Haiying, CHEN Guangdeng, et al. Root morphological characteristics of barley genotype with high phosphorus efficiency under phosphorus stress[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(10): 3020-3026.
PMID |
|
[36] | 王晓慧, 曹玉军, 魏雯雯, 等. 我国北方40个高产春玉米品种的磷素利用特性[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3): 580-589. |
WANG Xiaohui, CAO Yujun, WEI Wenwen, et al. Phosphorus utilization characteristics of forty spring maize hybrids with high-yielding potential in north of China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(3): 580-589. | |
[37] | 袁硕, 彭正萍, 史建霞, 等. 磷对不同基因型玉米生长及氮磷钾吸收的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010,(1): 25-28,80. |
YUAN Shuo, PENG Zhengping, SHI Jianxia, et al. Effects of P fertilizer application on the plant growth and nutrient uptake of N, P and K in different maize cultivars[J]. Soil and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2010,(1): 25-28, 80. |
[1] | CHEN Zhanhui, SUN Qiang, REN Jiaojiao, HUANG Bowen, XU Jiabo, YANG Jie, WU Penghao. QTL mapping and genomic selection of maize leaf width [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1606-1613. |
[2] | SHAO Panxia, ZHAO Zhun, SHAO Wukui, HAO Xiaoyan, GAO Shengqi, LI Jianping, HU Wenran, HUANG Quansheng. Expression analysis of ZmCDPK22 gene in maize under drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1372-1378. |
[3] | LU Yantian, SANG Zhiqin, XU Can, ZHANG Li, XIA Chunlan, WANG Youde, LI Wei, CHEN Shubin. Evolution of main characters of maize varieties approved in Xinjiang and Ningxia over the years and analysis of the current situation of variety approval [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388. |
[4] | YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840. |
[5] | Chen Guo, Hao Xiaoyan, Gao Shengqi, Hu Wenran, Zhao Zhun, Huang Quansheng. Genome-wide identification of the maize calcium-dependent protein kinase and drought expression analysis of the CDPK gene family in maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 857-864. |
[6] | DONG Xiuli, HAN Dengxu, YANG Jie, Abuleti Abula, DAI Aimei, LI Junjie, WANG Yejian, LIU Jun, XI Haojiang, LIANG Xiaoling, LI Mingdong. Comprehensive analysis of main agronomic traits of maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 865-871. |
[7] | DUAN Yanyan, HU Jing, QI Bingqin, PAN Zhiyuan, WU Haonan, GOU Ling. Response of reciprocal cross to lodging resistance and planting density of maize hybrids [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2949-2961. |
[8] | TANG Huaijun, XIE Xiaoqing, ZHANG Lei, SUN Baocheng, YANG Jie, LIU Cheng. Drought resistance identification and screening of 283 maize [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2687-2693. |
[9] | XIE Xiaoqing, TANG Huaijun, ZHANG Lei, SUN Baocheng, LIU Cheng. Changes of maize ear traits and drought resistance with irrigation amount [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2412-2418. |
[10] | YANG Minghua, WANG Qian, ZHOU Xinli, Aihemaitijiang Mahemuti, PEN Yuncheng, Aierjuma Tuluhan, Buayxam Namat, HOU Lili, LIU Qiang. Multiple Analysis on Character and Yield of Maize Hybrid Combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122. |
[11] | XING Yongfeng, ZHOU Wenwei, XU Weimeng, CHEN Guoli, WEI Changmin, LI Guizhi, SONG Wanyou, WAN Yanwei, ZHOU Enzhong, LI Weifang. Effects and Correlative Analysis of Slow-release Nitrogen Supply on Yield and Dry Matter of Summer Maize at Lime Concretion Black Soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2179-2185. |
[12] | YANG Jinyu, SUN Jiusheng, QIAO Xiaoyan, WANG Xihe, HUAI Guolong, CUI Lei. Effects of More Plants Per Hole on Maize Growth and Yield Components [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2186-2191. |
[13] | PAN Zhiyuan, DUAN Yanyan, CHANG Baoxue, CUI Zhenkun, QI Bingqin, HU Jing, GOU Ling. Research on the Lodging Resistance Characteristics and Heterosis in Different Height Maize Hybrids [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(7): 1590-1597. |
[14] | BA Aili, YANG Jing, JIA Feiyun, FAN Miaomiao, ZHANG Ran, LI Youyong. Screening of High Polymorphism SSR Primers for Classification of Heterosis Group in Maize (Zea mays L.) [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1373-1383. |
[15] | DING Xinhua, WANG Zhihui, JIA Zunzun, FU Kaiyun, Tursun Ahemaiti, YANG Jie, GUO Wenchao. Identification and Evaluation of Resistance to Borer of Main Maize Varieties in Different Growth Stages in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1180-1188. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||