Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 865-871.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.010
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources • Previous Articles Next Articles
DONG Xiuli1,2(), HAN Dengxu1,3, YANG Jie1,3, Abuleti Abula1(), DAI Aimei2(), LI Junjie2, WANG Yejian1, LIU Jun1, XI Haojiang1, LIANG Xiaoling1, LI Mingdong1
Received:
2022-07-30
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
Abuleti abula (1968-),male,kashgar,xinjiang,researcher,research direction: maize genetics and breeding,(E-mail) Supported by:
董秀丽1,2(), 韩登旭1,3, 杨杰1,3, 阿布来提·阿布拉1(), 戴爱梅2(), 李俊杰2, 王业建1, 刘俊1, 郗浩江1, 梁晓玲1, 李铭东1
通讯作者:
阿布来提·阿布拉(1968-),男,新疆喀什人,研究员,研究方向为玉米遗传育种,(E-mail)作者简介:
董秀丽(1983-),女,新疆温泉人,高级农艺师,研究方向为作物栽培,(E-mail)276007481@qq.cm
基金资助:
CLC Number:
DONG Xiuli, HAN Dengxu, YANG Jie, Abuleti Abula, DAI Aimei, LI Junjie, WANG Yejian, LIU Jun, XI Haojiang, LIANG Xiaoling, LI Mingdong. Comprehensive analysis of main agronomic traits of maize[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 865-871.
董秀丽, 韩登旭, 杨杰, 阿布来提·阿布拉, 戴爱梅, 李俊杰, 王业建, 刘俊, 郗浩江, 梁晓玲, 李铭东. 密植条件下玉米主要农艺性状的综合性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 865-871.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.010
变异来源 Variance source | 平方和 Squariance | df | 均方 Mean square | F | 显著性 significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Between experimental groups | 334.342 | 17 | 19.667 | 39.197 | 0.00 |
组内Within the experimental group | 18.063 | 36 | 0.502 | ||
总数Total | 352.406 | 53 |
Tab.1 Variance analysis of yield result
变异来源 Variance source | 平方和 Squariance | df | 均方 Mean square | F | 显著性 significant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
组间Between experimental groups | 334.342 | 17 | 19.667 | 39.197 | 0.00 |
组内Within the experimental group | 18.063 | 36 | 0.502 | ||
总数Total | 352.406 | 53 |
序号 Code | 品种名称 Variety name | 小区产量 Plot yield (kg) | 折合产量 Equivalent yield (kg/hm2) | 比CK增减 Increase compared with CK ± (%) | 产量位次 Yield rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||||
1 | 康地5184 | 16.68 | 15.63 | 15.92 | 13 397.89fGH | -24.18 | 17 |
2 | 新农001 | 21.55 | 20.19 | 20.44 | 17 273.09bcBCD | -2.25 | 5 |
3 | 亿科9158 | 15.72 | 13.69 | 14.33 | 12 150.61gH | -31.24 | 18 |
4 | 西亚3090 | 21.31 | 20.56 | 20.23 | 17 250.86bcBCD | -2.37 | 6 |
5 | 华西917 | 21.98 | 21.13 | 22.00 | 18 087.02bAB | 2.36 | 3 |
6 | 华西918 | 18.08 | 19.75 | 18.66 | 15 692.45dDE | -11.19 | 9 |
7 | 新农玉4320 | 18.51 | 18.00 | 18.34 | 15 236.87eEF | -13.77 | 11 |
8 | XY395 | 18.89 | 18.02 | 18.43 | 15 372.99eEF | -13.00 | 10 |
9 | 登海1786 | 16.69 | 15.52 | 16.21 | 13 450.67fGH | -23.88 | 16 |
10 | Kws3376 | 18.27 | 17.65 | 18.11 | 15 009.08deEFG | -15.06 | 12 |
11 | 登海1905 | 16.05 | 16.31 | 16.28 | 13 511.79fGH | -23.53 | 15 |
12 | 新农002 | 17.39 | 16.93 | 17.15 | 14 297.94efEFG | -19.09 | 13 |
13 | 亿科9254 | 16.52 | 16.56 | 16.65 | 13 814.58fFGH | -21.82 | 14 |
14 | 亿科9254 | 18.61 | 19.95 | 19.13 | 16 025.80cdCDE | -9.31 | 8 |
15 | 华西704 | 24.68 | 22.55 | 22.77 | 19 445.42aA | 10.05 | 1 |
16 | 登海1707 | 23.50 | 23.53 | 22.26 | 19 248.18aA | 8.93 | 2 |
17 | 禾山903 | 22.02 | 20.72 | 19.22 | 17 211.97bcBCD | -2.59 | 7 |
18 | 华美1号 | 22.12 | 20.38 | 21.11 | 17 670.33bBC | 4 |
Tab.2 Comparison of the yield characters of different maize varieties
序号 Code | 品种名称 Variety name | 小区产量 Plot yield (kg) | 折合产量 Equivalent yield (kg/hm2) | 比CK增减 Increase compared with CK ± (%) | 产量位次 Yield rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | Ⅲ | |||||
1 | 康地5184 | 16.68 | 15.63 | 15.92 | 13 397.89fGH | -24.18 | 17 |
2 | 新农001 | 21.55 | 20.19 | 20.44 | 17 273.09bcBCD | -2.25 | 5 |
3 | 亿科9158 | 15.72 | 13.69 | 14.33 | 12 150.61gH | -31.24 | 18 |
4 | 西亚3090 | 21.31 | 20.56 | 20.23 | 17 250.86bcBCD | -2.37 | 6 |
5 | 华西917 | 21.98 | 21.13 | 22.00 | 18 087.02bAB | 2.36 | 3 |
6 | 华西918 | 18.08 | 19.75 | 18.66 | 15 692.45dDE | -11.19 | 9 |
7 | 新农玉4320 | 18.51 | 18.00 | 18.34 | 15 236.87eEF | -13.77 | 11 |
8 | XY395 | 18.89 | 18.02 | 18.43 | 15 372.99eEF | -13.00 | 10 |
9 | 登海1786 | 16.69 | 15.52 | 16.21 | 13 450.67fGH | -23.88 | 16 |
10 | Kws3376 | 18.27 | 17.65 | 18.11 | 15 009.08deEFG | -15.06 | 12 |
11 | 登海1905 | 16.05 | 16.31 | 16.28 | 13 511.79fGH | -23.53 | 15 |
12 | 新农002 | 17.39 | 16.93 | 17.15 | 14 297.94efEFG | -19.09 | 13 |
13 | 亿科9254 | 16.52 | 16.56 | 16.65 | 13 814.58fFGH | -21.82 | 14 |
14 | 亿科9254 | 18.61 | 19.95 | 19.13 | 16 025.80cdCDE | -9.31 | 8 |
15 | 华西704 | 24.68 | 22.55 | 22.77 | 19 445.42aA | 10.05 | 1 |
16 | 登海1707 | 23.50 | 23.53 | 22.26 | 19 248.18aA | 8.93 | 2 |
17 | 禾山903 | 22.02 | 20.72 | 19.22 | 17 211.97bcBCD | -2.59 | 7 |
18 | 华美1号 | 22.12 | 20.38 | 21.11 | 17 670.33bBC | 4 |
性状 Character | 株高 Variety name X1 | 穗位高 Plant height X2 | 穗长 Ear length X3 | 穗粗 Ear diameter X4 | 突尖 Bald tip length X5 | 行粒数 Number of rows X6 | 穗粒重 Grain weight per ear X7 | 百粒重 100 grain weight X8 | 脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture X9 | 小区产量 Plot yield Y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 X1 Plant height | 0.858** | -0.064 | -0.043 | -0.056 | -0.034 | -0.063 | 0.084 | -0.158 | 0.077 | |
穗位高 X2 Ear height | 0.874** | -0.191 | -0.084 | 0.04 | -0.058 | -0.183 | -0.077 | -0.096 | -0.167 | |
穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.267 | 0.136 | 0.256 | -0.076 | 0.388 | 0.752** | 0.366 | 0.22 | 0.177 | |
穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.096 | 0.035 | 0.413 | -0.045 | 0.177 | 0.530* | 0.307 | 0.099 | 0.093 | |
突尖 X5 Bald length | -0.135 | -0.033 | -0.212 | -0.114 | 0.152 | 0.116 | 0.311 | 0.027 | 0.315 | |
行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.264 | 0.198 | 0.728** | 0.359 | -0.052 | 0.424 | -0.049 | -0.426 | 0.454 | |
穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.198 | 0.066 | 0.853** | 0.601** | -0.043 | 0.677** | 0.533* | 0.364 | 0.16 | |
百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.085 | -0.067 | 0.248 | 0.295 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 0.431 | 0.131 | 0.517* | |
脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.143 | -0.089 | 0.145 | 0.095 | 0.025 | -0.29 | 0.289 | 0.131 | -0.526* | |
小区产量 Y Plot yield | 0.216 | -0.021 | 0.398 | 0.21 | 0.203 | 0.565* | 0.352 | 0.485* | -0.484* |
Tab.3 Correlation analysis of main agronomic characters and plot yield
性状 Character | 株高 Variety name X1 | 穗位高 Plant height X2 | 穗长 Ear length X3 | 穗粗 Ear diameter X4 | 突尖 Bald tip length X5 | 行粒数 Number of rows X6 | 穗粒重 Grain weight per ear X7 | 百粒重 100 grain weight X8 | 脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture X9 | 小区产量 Plot yield Y |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 X1 Plant height | 0.858** | -0.064 | -0.043 | -0.056 | -0.034 | -0.063 | 0.084 | -0.158 | 0.077 | |
穗位高 X2 Ear height | 0.874** | -0.191 | -0.084 | 0.04 | -0.058 | -0.183 | -0.077 | -0.096 | -0.167 | |
穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.267 | 0.136 | 0.256 | -0.076 | 0.388 | 0.752** | 0.366 | 0.22 | 0.177 | |
穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.096 | 0.035 | 0.413 | -0.045 | 0.177 | 0.530* | 0.307 | 0.099 | 0.093 | |
突尖 X5 Bald length | -0.135 | -0.033 | -0.212 | -0.114 | 0.152 | 0.116 | 0.311 | 0.027 | 0.315 | |
行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.264 | 0.198 | 0.728** | 0.359 | -0.052 | 0.424 | -0.049 | -0.426 | 0.454 | |
穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.198 | 0.066 | 0.853** | 0.601** | -0.043 | 0.677** | 0.533* | 0.364 | 0.16 | |
百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.085 | -0.067 | 0.248 | 0.295 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 0.431 | 0.131 | 0.517* | |
脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.143 | -0.089 | 0.145 | 0.095 | 0.025 | -0.29 | 0.289 | 0.131 | -0.526* | |
小区产量 Y Plot yield | 0.216 | -0.021 | 0.398 | 0.21 | 0.203 | 0.565* | 0.352 | 0.485* | -0.484* |
项目 Item | 未标准化系数 Non-standardized coefficient | 标准误差 Standard error | 标准系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常量 Constant | -16.391 | 13.858 | -1.183 | 0.271 | |
株高 X1 Plant height | 9.663 | 4.996 | 0.626 | 1.934 | 0.089 |
穗位高 X2 Ear height | -14.69 | 6.717 | -0.685 | -2.187 | 0.06 |
穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.3 | 0.432 | 0.219 | 0.693 | 0.508 |
穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.736 | 1.503 | 0.089 | 0.489 | 0.638 |
突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.468 | 0.565 | 0.141 | 0.828 | 0.432 |
行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.469 | 0.197 | 0.898 | 2.376 | 0.045 |
穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | -0.055 | 0.032 | -0.823 | -1.734 | 0.121 |
百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.33 | 0.114 | 0.647 | 2.906 | 0.02 |
脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -7.384 | 21.294 | -0.085 | -0.347 | 0.738 |
Tab.4 The output results of regression coefficient
项目 Item | 未标准化系数 Non-standardized coefficient | 标准误差 Standard error | 标准系数 Standardized coefficient | t | 显著性 Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
常量 Constant | -16.391 | 13.858 | -1.183 | 0.271 | |
株高 X1 Plant height | 9.663 | 4.996 | 0.626 | 1.934 | 0.089 |
穗位高 X2 Ear height | -14.69 | 6.717 | -0.685 | -2.187 | 0.06 |
穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.3 | 0.432 | 0.219 | 0.693 | 0.508 |
穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.736 | 1.503 | 0.089 | 0.489 | 0.638 |
突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.468 | 0.565 | 0.141 | 0.828 | 0.432 |
行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.469 | 0.197 | 0.898 | 2.376 | 0.045 |
穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | -0.055 | 0.032 | -0.823 | -1.734 | 0.121 |
百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.33 | 0.114 | 0.647 | 2.906 | 0.02 |
脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -7.384 | 21.294 | -0.085 | -0.347 | 0.738 |
性状 Character | 简单 相关性 Simple CV | 直接通 径系数 Direct path coefficient | 间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | 合计 Total | |||
株高 X1 Plant height | 0.216 | 0.626 | - | -0.596 | 0.058 | 0.009 | -0.019 | 0.237 | -0.163 | 0.055 | 0.012 | -0.407 |
穗位高 X2 Ear height | -0.021 | -0.685 | 0.545 | - | 0.030 | 0.003 | -0.005 | 0.178 | -0.163 | -0.043 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.398 | 0.219 | 0.167 | -0.093 | - | 0.037 | -0.030 | 0.654 | -0.702 | 0.160 | -0.012 | 0.014 |
穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.21 | 0.089 | 0.060 | -0.024 | 0.090 | - | -0.016 | 0.322 | -0.495 | 0.191 | -0.008 | 0.061 |
突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.203 | 0.141 | -0.085 | 0.023 | -0.046 | -0.010 | - | -0.047 | 0.035 | 0.194 | -0.002 | 0.147 |
行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.565* | 0.898* | 0.165 | -0.136 | 0.159 | 0.032 | -0.007 | - | -0.557 | -0.013 | 0.025 | -0.497 |
穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.352 | -0.823 | 0.124 | -0.045 | 0.187 | 0.053 | -0.006 | 0.608 | - | 0.279 | -0.025 | 1.051 |
百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.485* | 0.647* | 0.053 | 0.046 | 0.054 | 0.026 | 0.042 | -0.018 | -0.355 | - | -0.011 | -0.215 |
脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.484* | -0.085 | -0.090 | 0.061 | 0.032 | 0.008 | 0.004 | -0.260 | -0.238 | 0.085 | - | -0.309 |
Tab.5 Path analysis between yield and main agronomic characters
性状 Character | 简单 相关性 Simple CV | 直接通 径系数 Direct path coefficient | 间接通径系数 Indirect path coefficient | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 | X9 | 合计 Total | |||
株高 X1 Plant height | 0.216 | 0.626 | - | -0.596 | 0.058 | 0.009 | -0.019 | 0.237 | -0.163 | 0.055 | 0.012 | -0.407 |
穗位高 X2 Ear height | -0.021 | -0.685 | 0.545 | - | 0.030 | 0.003 | -0.005 | 0.178 | -0.163 | -0.043 | 0.008 | 0.007 |
穗长 X3 Ear length | 0.398 | 0.219 | 0.167 | -0.093 | - | 0.037 | -0.030 | 0.654 | -0.702 | 0.160 | -0.012 | 0.014 |
穗粗 X4 Ear width | 0.21 | 0.089 | 0.060 | -0.024 | 0.090 | - | -0.016 | 0.322 | -0.495 | 0.191 | -0.008 | 0.061 |
突尖 X5 Bald length | 0.203 | 0.141 | -0.085 | 0.023 | -0.046 | -0.010 | - | -0.047 | 0.035 | 0.194 | -0.002 | 0.147 |
行粒数 X6 Number of rows | 0.565* | 0.898* | 0.165 | -0.136 | 0.159 | 0.032 | -0.007 | - | -0.557 | -0.013 | 0.025 | -0.497 |
穗粒重 X7 Grain weight per ear | 0.352 | -0.823 | 0.124 | -0.045 | 0.187 | 0.053 | -0.006 | 0.608 | - | 0.279 | -0.025 | 1.051 |
百粒重 X8 100 grain weight | 0.485* | 0.647* | 0.053 | 0.046 | 0.054 | 0.026 | 0.042 | -0.018 | -0.355 | - | -0.011 | -0.215 |
脱粒含水量 X9 Threshing moisture | -0.484* | -0.085 | -0.090 | 0.061 | 0.032 | 0.008 | 0.004 | -0.260 | -0.238 | 0.085 | - | -0.309 |
性状 Trait | 主成分 Principal components | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
株高 Plant height | 0.477 | -0.762 | 0.342 | 0.137 |
穗位高 Ear height | 0.348 | -0.809 | 0.372 | 0.159 |
穗长 Ear length | 0.891 | 0.124 | -0.185 | 0.048 |
穗粗 Ear width | 0.643 | 0.273 | -0.034 | 0.046 |
突尖 Bared tip | -0.143 | 0.226 | 0.643 | -0.551 |
行粒数 Row gtains | 0.776 | -0.122 | -0.352 | -0.399 |
穗粒重 Grain weight per panicil | 0.916 | 0.324 | 0.011 | 0.04 |
百粒重 100-grain weight | 0.36 | 0.419 | 0.625 | -0.166 |
脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture | 0.081 | 0.467 | 0.298 | 0.744 |
特征值 Characteristic root | 3.154 | 1.889 | 1.307 | 1.093 |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 20.986 | 14.523 | 12.149 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 56.029 | 70.552 | 82.701 |
Tab.6 Rotated factor pattern, characteristic root and contribution rate
性状 Trait | 主成分 Principal components | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
株高 Plant height | 0.477 | -0.762 | 0.342 | 0.137 |
穗位高 Ear height | 0.348 | -0.809 | 0.372 | 0.159 |
穗长 Ear length | 0.891 | 0.124 | -0.185 | 0.048 |
穗粗 Ear width | 0.643 | 0.273 | -0.034 | 0.046 |
突尖 Bared tip | -0.143 | 0.226 | 0.643 | -0.551 |
行粒数 Row gtains | 0.776 | -0.122 | -0.352 | -0.399 |
穗粒重 Grain weight per panicil | 0.916 | 0.324 | 0.011 | 0.04 |
百粒重 100-grain weight | 0.36 | 0.419 | 0.625 | -0.166 |
脱粒含水量 Threshing moisture | 0.081 | 0.467 | 0.298 | 0.744 |
特征值 Characteristic root | 3.154 | 1.889 | 1.307 | 1.093 |
贡献率 Contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 20.986 | 14.523 | 12.149 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 35.043 | 56.029 | 70.552 | 82.701 |
[1] | 董继广, 姜军侠, 白伟, 等. 陕西杨凌国家区试玉米品种病虫害抗性调查[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(16):174-178, 137. |
DONG Jiguang, JIANG Junxia, BAI Wei, et al. Investigation on pest resistance of Maize Varieties in Yangling National Regional Test[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 2019, 47(16): 174-178, 137. | |
[2] | 戴景瑞, 鄂立柱. 我国玉米育种科技创新问题的几点思考[J]. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(1):1-5. |
DAI Jingrui, ER Lizhu. Reflections on the Technological Innovation of Maize breeding in China[J]. Journal of Maize Science, 2010, 18(1):1-5. | |
[3] | 崔莹, 董雪, 葛立群. 中国玉米种业市场市场现状和发展研究[J]. 园艺与种苗, 2016,(2):75-78. |
CUI Ying, DONG Xue, GE Liqun, et al. Study on the development and market status of maize in China[J]. Horticulture & Seed, 2016,(2):75-78. | |
[4] | 杨金慧, 毛建昌, 李发民. 玉米杂交种农艺性状与子粒产量的相关和通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2003, 19(4):28-30. |
YANG Jinhui, MAO Jianchang, LI Famin. Correlation and path analysis between agronomic traits and grain yield of maize hybrids[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2003, 19(4):28-30. | |
[5] | 李军虎. 夏玉米杂交种主要农艺性状与产量的遗传相关和通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 1997,(3):16-19. |
LI Junhu. Genetic correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits and yield in summer maize hybrids[J]. Journal of Maize Science, 1997,(3):16-19. | |
[6] | 梁晓玲, 阿布来提, 冯国俊, 等. 玉米杂交种的产量比较及主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2001,(1):16-20. |
LIANG Xiaoling, Abuleti, FENG Guojun, et al. Yield comparison and correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits of maize hybrids[J]. Journal of Maize Science, 2001,(1):16-20. | |
[7] | 徐磊, 谭福忠, 师臣, 等. 黑龙江省西部干旱区玉米产量与产量构成因素的相关性分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020,(7):1-6. |
XU Lei, TAN Fuzhong, SHI Chen, et al. Correlation analysis of corn yield and yield components in arid areas of western Heilongjiang Province[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(7):1-6. | |
[8] | 张绍星, 肖春华, 邹楠, 等. 玉米品种高产稳产的综合评价研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(4):425-430. |
ZHANG Shaoxing, XIAO Chunhua, ZOU Nan, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of high and stable yield of maize varieties[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural Science Ed.), 2017, 35(4):425-430. | |
[9] | 阿依古丽·艾买提, 别力克孜·阿西木, 阿布来提, 等. 南疆地区春播玉米产量与主要农艺性状的相关研究[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2006, 43(6):490-492. |
Ayiguli Aimaiti, Belizzi Asimu, Abulaiti, et al. Spring sowing corn yield and its correlation with main agronomic traits in southern Xinjiang region[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 43(6):490-492. | |
[10] |
史宏. 不同生态类型大豆农艺性状与产量关系的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(1):150-159.
DOI |
SHI Hong. Relationship between agronomic traits and yield of soybean of different ecological types[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinia, 2016, 33(1):150-159. | |
[11] | 杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6. |
DU Jiaju, CHEN Zhiwei. Method of path analysis with SPSS linear regression[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2010, 45(2):4-6. | |
[12] | 任洪雷, 李春霞, 龚士琛, 等. 利用SPSS实现玉米杂交种主要农艺性状与产量的相关和通径分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019,(3):86-90. |
REN Honglei, LI Chunxia, GONG Shichen, et al. Correlation and path analysis of main agronomic traits and yield of maize hybrids using SPSS[J]. Crops, 2019,(3):86-90. | |
[13] | 沈恩庭, 房春兴, 唐怀坡. 适合玉米机收的含水量与产量关系的试验研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(24):31-33. |
SHEN Enting, FANG Chunxing, TANG Huaipo. Experimental study on the relationship between water content and yield of maize[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 19(24):31-33. | |
[14] |
鲁珊, 肖荷霞, 毛彩云, 等. 不同类型玉米主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19):11-14.
DOI |
LU Shan, XIAO Hexia, MAO Caiyun, et al. Correlation and Path Analysis of Major Agronomic Traits of Maize Types[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(19):11-14. | |
[15] | 李建中, 于广军, 许洛, 等. 抗逆丰产宜机收夏玉米品种筛选[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2019, 47(22):21-23. |
LI Jianzhong, YU Guangjun, XU Luo, et al. Selection of summer maize varieties with stress resistance and high yield suitable for machine harvesting[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(22): 21-23. | |
[16] | 李少昆. 我国玉米机械粒收质量影响因素及粒收技术的发展方向[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 35(3):265-272. |
LI Shaokun. Influencing factors of corn mechanical harvesting quality and development direction of corn mechanical harvesting technology in China[J]. Journal of Shihezi University (Natural science Ed.), 2017, 35(3):265-272. | |
[17] |
杨杰, 韩登旭, 王业建, 等. 新疆干旱区密植条件下不同玉米品种主要农艺性状及耐密性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(9):1569-1577.
DOI |
YANG Jie, HAN Dengxu, WANG Yejian, et al. Study on Main Agronomic Traitsand Density Tonlerance of Different Maize Varieties under Dense Planting Conditions in Arid Areas of Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(9):1569-1577.
DOI |
|
[18] | 吴伟华, 柳家友, 袁刘正, 等. 花期高温对不同玉米品种主要农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2020, 48(6):33-36. |
WU Weihua, LIU Jiayou, YUAN Liuzheng, et al. Effects of high temperature at flowering stage on Main Agronomic Characters and yield of Different Maize Varieties[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(6):33-36. | |
[19] |
孟静娇, 陈百翠, 李琰聪, 等. 区域试验中玉米品种的高产稳产性综合分析与评判[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(21):11-18.
DOI |
MENG Jingjiao, CHEN Baicui, LI Yancong, et al. Comprehensive analysis and evaluation of high and stable yield of Maize Varieties in regional trials[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(21):11-18.
DOI |
|
[20] | 王浥州, 张万旭, 王克如, 等. 新疆玉米机械收获籽粒含水率与相关形状的关系[J]. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(9):1417-1427. |
WANG Suzhou, ZHANG Wanxu, WANG Keru, et al. The relationship between moisture content and related shape of maize mechanical harvest in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agriculture Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(9):1417-1427. |
[1] | WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, GAO Wenju, LONG Yilei, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | CHEN Maoguang, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, LIU Haijun, WANG Yifan, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of mulch film types on cotton growth and analysis of self-degradation recycling characteristics [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[3] | YANG Guojiang, CHEN Yun, LIN Xiangqun, HE Jiangyong, LIU Shenglin, QU Yongqing. Effects of organic fertilizer replacement on the yield and nutrient absorption of cotton and nitrate nitrogen under chemical fertilizer reduction [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[4] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[5] | WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[6] | WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[7] | XIANG Li, WANG Xian, DONG Yusheng, GUO Xiaoling, FANG Furong, CHEN Zhijun, MA Yanming, MIAO Yu. Effects of exogenous butyric acid on yield and quality of barley under drought stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181. |
[8] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[9] | WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[10] | DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[11] | LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[12] | ZHANG Chao, BAI Yungang, ZHENG Ming, XIAO Jun, DING Ping. Synergistic effect of water and fertilizer on grape in extreme arid area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939. |
[13] | WANG Ting, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Fanfan, HUANG Rongzheng, LI Xiao, ZHANG Yulin, CHEN Yongcheng, ZHAO Jiantao, MA Chunhui. Poduction performance screening and nutritional value evaluation of corn varieties suitable for silage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605. |
[14] | SHI Xiaolei, DING Sunlei, CONG Hua, ZHANG Jinbo, QU Kejia, WANG Xingzhou, HAN dai, YAN Yongliang. Gray correlation analysis of reast soybean yield correlation traits [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1641-1652. |
[15] | YAN Yongliang, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, SHI Xiaolei, WANG Xingzhou, ZHANG Jinbo, CONG Hua. Comparative study on the agronomic traits and yields of different soybean varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1653-1662. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||