Influence of Pesticide Reduction and Synergist on Utilization Rates and Droplets Distribution in Corn Field

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.11.010

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (11): 2675-2681.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.11.010

• Plant Protection・Prataculture・Animal Husbandry Veterinarian • Previous Articles Next Articles

Influence of Pesticide Reduction and Synergist on Utilization Rates and Droplets Distribution in Corn Field

FU Kaiyun¹(), WANG Zhihui², DING Xinhua¹, Tursun Ahmat¹, WANG Xiaowu², JIA Zunzun³, Arziguli Rouzi¹, GUO Wenchao¹()

1. Key Laboratory of Intergraded Management of Harmful Crop Vermin of China Northwestern Oasis, MOARA/ Institute of Plant Protection,Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Urumqi 830091,China
2. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Special Environmental Microbiology/Research Institute of Applied Microbiology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
3. College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2022-01-21 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-12-28
Correspondence author: GUO Wenchao
Supported by:
National Key R&D Program Project "Integrated Research and Demonstration of Northern Corn Fertilizer and Pesticide Reduction Technology"(2017YFD0201800)

玉米田增效剂及药剂减施措施对农药沉积分布的影响

付开赟¹(), 王志慧², 丁新华¹, 吐尔逊・阿合买提¹, 王小武², 贾尊尊³, 阿尔孜姑丽・肉孜¹, 郭文超¹()

1.新疆农业科学院植物保护研究所/农业农村部西北荒漠绿洲作物有害生物综合治理重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆农业科学院微生物应用研究所/新疆特殊环境微生物重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆农业大学农学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

通讯作者: 郭文超
作者简介:付开赟(1987-),男,浙江杭州人,助理研究员,博士,研究方向为农业害虫与昆虫防治,(E-mail)fukaiyun000@foxmail.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划“北方玉米化肥农药减施技术集成研究与示范”(2017YFD02018)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To validate the influence of pesticide reduction and synergist on utilization rates and droplets distribution in corn field in the hope of providing theoretical basis for protection measures based on synergist and reduction of pesticide. 【Methods】 34％ Ethoxyl methoxyhydrazide and 20％ chlorfenoxamide were sprayed in corn filed at heading stage by Dajiang Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) T16 to test the influence of synergists (Jijian, Huifeng, Oukesen) or gradient reduction of pesticide on utilization rates and droplets distribution on corn plants. 【Results】 In the treatment of pesticide reduction, reducing usage of 30％ pesticide treatment reached the maximum of droplets distribution and the utilization rates was 45.60％. Adding additive could significantly increase the utilization rates, and also droplets distribution on the upper layer on corn plant, but no influence on middle or lower layer. Adding synergist didn’t lead to a significant effect on utilization rates and droplets distribution. 【Conclusion】 There is no significant influence on utilization rates or droplets distribution by adding synergist; Adding plant protection specific UAV-additives could significantly increase utilization rates, droplets distribution and deposition density.

Key words: synergist; corn; plant protection specific UAV; deposition density; droplets distribution; utilization rates

摘要：

【目的】研究增效剂及药剂减施措施对玉米植株沉积分布的影响,为基于增效剂的农药减施防治手段提供理论依据。【方法】采用大疆T16型无人机在玉米抽穗期进行喷雾施药处理,以34％乙多·甲氧虫悬浮剂、20％氯虫苯甲酰胺悬浮剂为试验药剂,添加飞防助剂配合不同增效剂(激健、辉丰、欧克森)及药剂减施梯度处理,分析其对玉米植株在沉积量及沉积利用率的影响。【结果】在药剂减施处理中,减施30％处理在玉米植株上有最大沉积量且沉积利用率可达到45.60％;添加飞防助剂在玉米植株对药剂沉积利用率有显著性提高,并对上层沉积量有明显提高,但对中、下层沉积量无显著影响;添加增效剂处理在玉米植株上相比于对照对沉积量及沉积利用率无显著性影响。【结论】合理添加新型增效剂减施30％对农药利用率无显著性影响;添加无人机飞防助剂可有效提升农药利用率。

关键词: 增效剂, 玉米, 植保无人飞机, 雾滴沉积密度, 雾滴沉积量, 沉积利用率

CLC Number:

S435.112.6

FU Kaiyun, WANG Zhihui, DING Xinhua, Tursun Ahmat, WANG Xiaowu, JIA Zunzun, Arziguli Rouzi, GUO Wenchao. Influence of Pesticide Reduction and Synergist on Utilization Rates and Droplets Distribution in Corn Field[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(11): 2675-2681.

付开赟, 王志慧, 丁新华, 吐尔逊・阿合买提, 王小武, 贾尊尊, 阿尔孜姑丽・肉孜, 郭文超. 玉米田增效剂及药剂减施措施对农药沉积分布的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(11): 2675-2681.

Figures/Tables 5

References 19

[1]	孔令娟, 李冰. 安徽省玉米生产现状及发展趋势的探讨[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2002,(6):8-9, 12.
	KONG Lingjuan, LI Bin. Discussion on present situation and development trend of maize production in Anhui Province[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2002,(6):8-9, 12.
[2]	杨庆才. 玉米产业经济发展战略的思考[J]. 玉米科学, 2010, 18(1):135-138.
	YANG Qingcai. Thinking on economic development strategy of maize industry[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2010, 18(1):135-138.
[3]	宋海燕, 张晴晴, 李丽莉, 等. 亚洲玉米螟和桃蛀螟危害对玉米产量损失的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2019, 51(6):135-138.
	SONG Haiyan, ZHANG Qingqing, LI Lili, et al. Effects of Asian corn borer and peach borer on yield loss of maize[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 51(6):135-138.
[4]	金凤. 农药对环境的污染及防治对策[J]. 环境与发展, 2018, 30(1):49, 51.
	JIN Feng. Environmental pollution by pesticides and its prevention and control countermeasures[J]. Environment and Development, 2018, 30(1):49, 51.
[5]	倪同良, 张建波, 李少凡. 农药使用对生物多样性的影响及控制对策[J]. 山东林业科技, 2005,(1):75-77.
	NI Tongliang, ZHANG Jianbo, LI Shaofan. The Effect of the Agriculture Chemical to the Biodiversyty and the its Countermeasures[J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2005,(1):75-77.
[6]	高圆圆, 张玉涛, 赵酉城, 等. 小型无人机低空喷洒在玉米田的雾滴沉积分布及对玉米螟的防治效果初探[J]. 植物保护, 2013, 39(2):152-157.
	GAO Yuanyuan, ZHANG Yutao, ZHAO Youcheng, et al. A preliminary study on the deposition and distribution of fog drops sprayed by small unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) at low altitude in corn field and its control effect on corn borer[J]. Plant Protection, 2013, 39(2):152-157.
[7]	董红强, 赵冰梅, 李平, 等. 喷雾方式及桶混助剂对啶虫脒防治棉蚜效果的影响[J]. 农药, 2015, 54(10) :770-772.
	DONG Hongqiang, ZHAO Bingmei, LI Ping, et al. Effect of spray method and barrel mixture on control of cotton aphid by acetamiprid[J]. Agrochemicals, 2015, 54(10):770-772.
[8]	袁会珠, 郭永旺, 薛新宇, 等. 植保无人飞机的推广应用对于提高我国农药利用率的作用[J]. 农业工程技术, 2018, 38(9):46-50.
	YUAN Huizhu, GUO Yongwang, XUE Xinyu, et al. Promotion and application of plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle to improve pesticide utilization rate in China[J]. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2018, 38(9):46-50.
[9]	何玲, 王国宾, 胡韬, 等. 喷雾助剂及施液量对植保无人机喷雾雾滴在水稻植株沉积分布的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2017, 44(6):1046-1052.
	HE Ling, WANG Guobin, HU Tao, et al. Effects of spray additives and application amount on deposition and distribution of plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle spray droplets in rice plants[J]. Plant Protection, 2017, 44(6):1046-1052.
[10]	王斌, 袁洪印. 无人机喷药技术发展现状与趋势[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, (7):59-62.
	WANG Bin, YUAN Hongyin. Development status and trend of uav spraying technology[J]. Agriculture and Technology, 2016,(7):59-62.
[11]	白雪峰, 张瑞军, 李悦华, 等. 通过助剂对防治玉米螟减药增效研究[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2018,(8):100-101.
	BAI Xufeng, ZHANG Ruijun, LI Yuehua, et al. Study on reducing medicine and increasing efficiency of corn borer by auxiliaries[J]. Agricultural Science and Technology Newsletter, 2018,(8):100-101.
[12]	袁会珠, 王忠群, 孙瑞红, 等. 喷洒部件及喷雾助剂对担架式喷雾机在桃园喷雾中的雾滴沉积分布的影响[J]. 植物保护, 2010. 36(1): 106-109.
	YUAN Huizhu, WANG Zhongqun, SUN Ruihong, et al. Effects of spray components and spray additives on droplet deposition distribution of stretcher sprayer in Taoyuan Spray[J]. Plant Protection, 2010, 36(1): 106-109.
[13]	刘小英, 顾士光, 金宝根, 等. 浅谈当前农药减量增效措施[J]. 上海农业科技, 2009,(5):33-34.
	LIU Xiaoying, GU Shiguang, JIN Baogen, et al. Discussion on current measures of reducing pesticide dosage and increasing efficiency[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009,(5):33-34.
[14].	邱占奎, 袁会珠, 楼少巍, 等. 水溶性染色剂诱惑红和丽春红-G作为农药沉积分布的示踪剂研究[J]. 农药, 2007,(5):323-325, 337.
	QIU Zhankui, YUAN Huizhu, LUO Shaowei, et al. The Research of Water Soluble Dyes of Allura Red and Ponceau-G as Tracers for Determing Pesticide Spray Distribution[J]. Agrochemicals, 2007,(5):323-325, 337.
[15]	崔丽, 王金凤, 秦维彩, 等. 机动弥雾法施用70％吡虫啉水分散粒剂防治小麦蚜虫的雾滴沉积密度与防效的关系[J]. 农药学学报, 2010, 12(3): 313-318.
	CUI Li, WANG Jinfeng, QIN Weicai, et al. Relationship between droplet deposition density and control efficiency of using 70％ imidacloprid water-dispersible granule to control wheat aphid by motorized fogging method[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2010, 12(3): 313-318.
[16]	石鑫, 高赛超, 杨代斌, 等. 农药沉积利用率喷雾指示剂诱惑红的酶标仪测定方法[J]. 现代农药. 2021,(1):35-37.
	SHI Xin, GAO Saichao, YANG Daibing, et al. Pesticide deposition availability spray indicator - Determination of temptation red - microplate meter[J]. Modern Agrochemicals, 2021,(1):35-37.
[17]	2020.NY/T 3630. 1-2020. 农药利用率田间测定方法第1部分:大田作物茎叶喷雾的农药沉积利用率测定方法-诱惑红指示剂法[S].
	NY/T 3630.1-2020 Field method for determination of pesticide availability - Part 1: Determination of pesticide deposition availability by spray on stems and leaves of field crops - red indicator method[S].
[18]	简捷, 王军. AA-921农业航空喷洒助剂的应用[J]. 新疆农垦经济, 1997, (4):45-46.
	JIAN Jie, WANG Jun. Application of AA - 921 agricultural aviation spraying agent[J]. Xinjiang State Farms Economy, 1997,(4):45-46.
[19]	顾中言, 许小龙, 韩丽娟. 表面活性剂在农药使用中的作用研究[J]. 现代农药, 2003,(4):21-23.
	GU Zhongyan, XU Xiaolong, HAN Xiujuan. Study on the role of surfactants in pesticide use[J]. Modern Agrochemicals, 2003,(4):21-23.

处理 Treatment	药剂名称 Insecticide	施药剂量 Dosage of insecticide (mL/hm²)	用水量 Amount of water (L/hm²)	飞防助剂用量 Dosage of additive (mL/hm²)	增效剂种类和用量 Types and dosage of synergist (mL/hm²)
1	20％氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	150.00	15.00	225.00	/
2	20％氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	150.00	15.00	/	/
3	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	525.00	15.00	225.00	/
4	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	446.25	15.00	225.00	/
5	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	/
6	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	增效剂1 225.00
7	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	增效剂2 150.00
8	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	增效剂3 450.00
9	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	525.00	15.00	/	/

处理 Treatment	药剂名称 Insecticide	施药剂量 Dosage of insecticide (mL/hm²)	用水量 Amount of water (L/hm²)	飞防助剂用量 Dosage of additive (mL/hm²)	增效剂种类和用量 Types and dosage of synergist (mL/hm²)
1	20％氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	150.00	15.00	225.00	/
2	20％氯虫苯甲酰胺SC	150.00	15.00	/	/
3	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	525.00	15.00	225.00	/
4	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	446.25	15.00	225.00	/
5	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	/
6	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	增效剂1 225.00
7	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	增效剂2 150.00
8	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	367.50	15.00	225.00	增效剂3 450.00
9	34％乙多·甲氧虫SC	525.00	15.00	/	/

处理 Treatment	沉积量 Deposition distribution (μg/cm²)			沉积利用率 Utilization rate (％)
处理 Treatment	上层 Upper	中层 Middle	下层 Lower	沉积利用率 Utilization rate (％)
1	0.409±0.123^b	0.222±0.019^b	0.112±0.070^b	53.75±27.33^a
2	0.353±0.172^b	0.184±0.065^b	0.101±0.032^b	43.72±10.33^b
3	0.556±0.255^b	0.283±0.077^b	0.164±0.087^b	53.99±18.57^a
4	0.485±0.132^ab	0.231±0.043^b	0.124±0.024^b	48.49±11.91^ab
5	0.820±0.436^a	0.553±0.144^a	0.329±0.045^a	50.60±6.57^ab
6	0.460±0.260^b	0.171±0.008^b	0.097±0.011^b	54.37±14.90^a
7	0.380±0.071^b	0.177±0.011^b	0.106±0.009^b	53.25±7.16^a
8	0.498±0.051^ab	0.221±0.037^b	0.099±0.043^b	52.83±13.66^ab
9	0.223±0.090^b	0.198±0.136^b	0.137±0.077^b	42.96±7.12^b

处理 Treatment	沉积量 Deposition distribution (μg/cm²)			沉积利用率 Utilization rate (％)
处理 Treatment	上层 Upper	中层 Middle	下层 Lower	沉积利用率 Utilization rate (％)
1	0.409±0.123^b	0.222±0.019^b	0.112±0.070^b	53.75±27.33^a
2	0.353±0.172^b	0.184±0.065^b	0.101±0.032^b	43.72±10.33^b
3	0.556±0.255^b	0.283±0.077^b	0.164±0.087^b	53.99±18.57^a
4	0.485±0.132^ab	0.231±0.043^b	0.124±0.024^b	48.49±11.91^ab
5	0.820±0.436^a	0.553±0.144^a	0.329±0.045^a	50.60±6.57^ab
6	0.460±0.260^b	0.171±0.008^b	0.097±0.011^b	54.37±14.90^a
7	0.380±0.071^b	0.177±0.011^b	0.106±0.009^b	53.25±7.16^a
8	0.498±0.051^ab	0.221±0.037^b	0.099±0.043^b	52.83±13.66^ab
9	0.223±0.090^b	0.198±0.136^b	0.137±0.077^b	42.96±7.12^b

处理 Treat ment	雾滴密度 Deposition density (μg/cm²)
处理 Treat ment	上层 Upper	中层 Middle	下层 Lower
1	40.23±5.80^a	49.83±10.74^a	48.95±10.00^a
2	31.01±3.60^b	35.21±3.50^b	33.89±1.07^b
3	44.36±3.87^a	53.21±12.01^a	51.14±5.50^a
4	46.25±8.12^a	50.48±7.50^a	47.58±5.96^a
5	35.86±7.95^ab	47.95±5.06^a	46.06±7.24^a
6	56.24±16.68^a	73.20±20.95^a	57.19±14.04^a
7	51.65±7.69^a	56.62±6.27^a	51.22±22.32^a
8	45.83±11.49^a	62.54±8.56^a	53.09±9.87^a
9	33.90±6.51^b	38.07±3.56^b	34.33±6.48^b

Influence of Pesticide Reduction and Synergist on Utilization Rates and Droplets Distribution in Corn Field

玉米田增效剂及药剂减施措施对农药沉积分布的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 5

References 19

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

[1]	WANG Ting, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Fanfan, HUANG Rongzheng, LI Xiao, ZHANG Yulin, CHEN Yongcheng, ZHAO Jiantao, MA Chunhui. Poduction performance screening and nutritional value evaluation of corn varieties suitable for silage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[2]	LAN Chenyihang, YAO Yubo, ZHOU Junxiang, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, YIN Xiaohui, LIU Wen, WANG Na, GUO Wenchao, DENF Jianyu. Research progress on sex pheromone identification and application of Asian corn borer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1614-1622.
[3]	ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie, LIU Changwen. Effects of combined application of nitrogen enhancer and nitrogen reduction on leaf physiology and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325.
[4]	HOU Liangzhong, GUO Tongjun, ZHANG Junyu, SU Lingling, Guzalnur Amat, WEN Xiaoyan, ZHU Xiaofang, YANG Jianzhong, WANG Wenqi. Effect Evaluation of Mixed Storage of Different Proportions of Seed Pumpkin Waste and Corn Straw [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 567-573.
[5]	ZHANG Wei, JIN Fan, LI Qianxu, ZHANG Junsan, ZHAI Xiuping, WANG Shanbo. Design and experiment of cleaning device for corn grain combine harvester [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 3102-3112.
[6]	WEI Yong, GAO Yu, YANG Min, XU Zihao, REN Wanping. Effects of feeding steam-pressed corn on meat performance and liver nutrient metabolism of Xinjiang brown cattle [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2583-2589.
[7]	WANG Ting, ZHANG Fanfan, HUANG Hua, YANG Guangwei, CHENG Weiguo, ZHANG Li, MA Chunhui. Evaluation of the Whole-Plant Corn Silage Quality of Large-Scale Pastures Based on Fuzzy Similarity Priority Ratio Method [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 215-225.
[8]	QI Tong, HUANG Jian, XU Fei, HAN Dengxu. Effects of Compound Salt Stress on Germination of 7 Maize Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1855-1863.
[9]	WANG Yan, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, MA Xiaoyan, CHEN Ruigang, HUANGFU Beijiong, KONG Depeng, GAO Haifeng. Assessment of Synergism of Florasulam Halauxifen-methyl Added with Three Synergists on Controlling Broad Leaf Weeds in Spring Wheat Field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1450-1457.
[10]	YUAN Jie, DING Xinhua, JIA Zun, FU Kaiyun, Tursun Ahemat, HE Jiang, GUO Wenchao. Effects of Different Nitrogen Contents on Population Proliferation of Asian Corn Borer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(6): 1458-1465.
[11]	LI Yali, Harihash Yibati, YU Jinli, LI Qingjun. Application of Chemical Fertilizer Combined with Manure Improves Maize Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Grain Zinc Content [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1077-1083.
[12]	YUAN Jie, DING Xinhua, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, Aerziguli Ruo, Tursun Ahemat, GUO Wenchao. Effects of Different Nitrogen Contents on Population Proliferation of Asian Corn Borer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(5): 1196-1202.
[13]	WANG Zhenguo, MA Yuanyuan, WANG Xina, LIU Shaoquan, GU Chaofeng, JI Qiang. Effects of Biochar Input on Soil Organic Carbon and Maize Growth [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 818-826.
[14]	SONG Zishuo, YANG Jie, DING Xinhua, FU Kaiyun, Tuerxun Ahemati, HE Jiang, GUO Wenchao. Occurrence and Damage Analysis of Corn Stalk Rot Desert Oasis Ecological Region [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(4): 950-956.
[15]	XU Haitao, FENG Xiaoxi, XU Bo, GUO Haibin, ZHANG Jungang, WANG Chengye. Effects of Nitrogen and Water Collaborative Supply on Accumulation and Distribution of Dry Matter and Nitrogen, Nitrogen Transport and Use Efficiency of corn [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(12): 2957-2968.