Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 1855-1863.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.005
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
QI Tong1(), HUANG Jian1, XU Fei1, HAN Dengxu2
Received:
2021-10-16
Online:
2022-08-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Correspondence author:
QI Tong
Supported by:
通讯作者:
祁通
作者简介:
祁通(1982-),甘肃武威人,副研究员,研究方向为盐碱土改良与利用,(E-mail) tong1982nn@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
QI Tong, HUANG Jian, XU Fei, HAN Dengxu. Effects of Compound Salt Stress on Germination of 7 Maize Varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1855-1863.
祁通, 黄建, 徐菲, 韩登旭. 复合盐胁迫对7个玉米品种萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1855-1863.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.005
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 3±1.3b | 2±0.7b | 1.3±0.3c | 1.1±0c | 1.2±0.3c |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 5.1±0.7a | 3.3±0.1b | 3.0±0.4ab | 3.0±0.4a | 2.3±0a |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 4.5±1.0ab | 3.5±0.4ab | 2.4±0.4bc | 2.1±0.8abc | 2.0±0.2ab |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 4.1±0.5ab | 4.6±0.4a | 3.6±0.2a | 2.6±0.5a | 2.3±0.1a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 4.1±0.5ab | 3.3±0.2b | 2.3±0.6bc | 2.3±0.3ab | 1.5±0.4abc |
KWS9384 | 4.4±0.2ab | 2.7±0.4bc | 2.4±0.3bc | 2.3±0.4ab | 1.5±0.3bc |
KWS3376 | 2.8±0.1b | 2.0±0.3b | 2.0±0.6bc | 1.6±0.2bc | 1.1±0.5c |
均值 Mean value | 4.0±1.0 | 3.1±0.9 | 2.4±0.8 | 2.3±0.7 | 1.7±0.5 |
F值 | 3.554* | 15.619** | 9.273** | 9.542** | 9.613** |
Table 2 Effects of salt concentration on radicle length of different maize varieties(cm)
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 3±1.3b | 2±0.7b | 1.3±0.3c | 1.1±0c | 1.2±0.3c |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 5.1±0.7a | 3.3±0.1b | 3.0±0.4ab | 3.0±0.4a | 2.3±0a |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 4.5±1.0ab | 3.5±0.4ab | 2.4±0.4bc | 2.1±0.8abc | 2.0±0.2ab |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 4.1±0.5ab | 4.6±0.4a | 3.6±0.2a | 2.6±0.5a | 2.3±0.1a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 4.1±0.5ab | 3.3±0.2b | 2.3±0.6bc | 2.3±0.3ab | 1.5±0.4abc |
KWS9384 | 4.4±0.2ab | 2.7±0.4bc | 2.4±0.3bc | 2.3±0.4ab | 1.5±0.3bc |
KWS3376 | 2.8±0.1b | 2.0±0.3b | 2.0±0.6bc | 1.6±0.2bc | 1.1±0.5c |
均值 Mean value | 4.0±1.0 | 3.1±0.9 | 2.4±0.8 | 2.3±0.7 | 1.7±0.5 |
F值 | 3.554* | 15.619** | 9.273** | 9.542** | 9.613** |
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 2.6±0.4a | 2.0±0.2a | 1.8±0.5bc | 1.2±0.1b | 0.7±0.3c |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 2.5±0.3a | 1.6±0.8a | 2.3±0.4b | 2.1±0.2a | 1.4±0.3bc |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 2.6±0.3a | 1.9±0.4a | 1.9±0.3bc | 1.7±0.2bc | 1.1±0.3bc |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 2.7±0.2a | 2.6±0.4a | 2.5±0.2a | 2.2±0.3a | 2.0±0.5a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 2.3±0.8a | 1.4±0.4a | 1.6±0.5bc | 1.3±0.2bc | 1.1±0.2bc |
KWS9384 | 2.8±0.2a | 2.5±1.2a | 1.8±0.7bc | 1.6±0.4bc | 1.7±0.1b |
KWS3376 | 2.3±0.4a | 1.7±0.4a | 1.5±0.3bc | 1.8±0.2bc | 1.5±0.2b |
均值 Mean value | 2.6±0.4 | 1.9±0.7 | 1.9±0.6 | 1.7±0.4 | 1.4±0.6 |
F值 | 0.637ns | 1.669ns | 2.830* | 3.433* | 10.837** |
Table 3 Effects of salt concentration on germ length of different maize varieties(cm)
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 2.6±0.4a | 2.0±0.2a | 1.8±0.5bc | 1.2±0.1b | 0.7±0.3c |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 2.5±0.3a | 1.6±0.8a | 2.3±0.4b | 2.1±0.2a | 1.4±0.3bc |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 2.6±0.3a | 1.9±0.4a | 1.9±0.3bc | 1.7±0.2bc | 1.1±0.3bc |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 2.7±0.2a | 2.6±0.4a | 2.5±0.2a | 2.2±0.3a | 2.0±0.5a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 2.3±0.8a | 1.4±0.4a | 1.6±0.5bc | 1.3±0.2bc | 1.1±0.2bc |
KWS9384 | 2.8±0.2a | 2.5±1.2a | 1.8±0.7bc | 1.6±0.4bc | 1.7±0.1b |
KWS3376 | 2.3±0.4a | 1.7±0.4a | 1.5±0.3bc | 1.8±0.2bc | 1.5±0.2b |
均值 Mean value | 2.6±0.4 | 1.9±0.7 | 1.9±0.6 | 1.7±0.4 | 1.4±0.6 |
F值 | 0.637ns | 1.669ns | 2.830* | 3.433* | 10.837** |
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 2.59±0.11a | 1.08±0.08cd | 0.8±0.03b | 0.46±0.01c | 0.55±0.03c |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 3.48±0.01a | 2.57±0.05ab | 2.12±0.17ab | 1.78±0.1ab | 1.47±0.03ab |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 2.58±0.12a | 2.74±0.03ab | 1.58±0.18b | 1.83±0.07ab | 0.88±0.07bc |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 3.37±0.22a | 3.2±0.12a | 3.01±0.02a | 2.16±0.12a | 1.83±0.04a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 2.98±0.1a | 1.52±0.08bcd | 0.93±0.05b | 1.18±0.02abc | 0.61±0.02c |
KWS9384 | 3.13±0.06a | 2.26±0.14abc | 1.99±0.02ab | 1.27±0.06abc | 0.74±0.04bc |
KWS3376 | 2.27±0.02a | 0.81±0.05d | 0.8±0.06b | 0.76±0.04bc | 0.49±0.08c |
均值 Mean value | 2.91±0.12 | 2.03±0.16 | 1.69±0.17 | 1.35±0.11 | 0.94±0.09 |
F值 | 1.292ns | 9.301** | 7.387** | 6.155* | 9.019** |
Table 4
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 2.59±0.11a | 1.08±0.08cd | 0.8±0.03b | 0.46±0.01c | 0.55±0.03c |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 3.48±0.01a | 2.57±0.05ab | 2.12±0.17ab | 1.78±0.1ab | 1.47±0.03ab |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 2.58±0.12a | 2.74±0.03ab | 1.58±0.18b | 1.83±0.07ab | 0.88±0.07bc |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 3.37±0.22a | 3.2±0.12a | 3.01±0.02a | 2.16±0.12a | 1.83±0.04a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 2.98±0.1a | 1.52±0.08bcd | 0.93±0.05b | 1.18±0.02abc | 0.61±0.02c |
KWS9384 | 3.13±0.06a | 2.26±0.14abc | 1.99±0.02ab | 1.27±0.06abc | 0.74±0.04bc |
KWS3376 | 2.27±0.02a | 0.81±0.05d | 0.8±0.06b | 0.76±0.04bc | 0.49±0.08c |
均值 Mean value | 2.91±0.12 | 2.03±0.16 | 1.69±0.17 | 1.35±0.11 | 0.94±0.09 |
F值 | 1.292ns | 9.301** | 7.387** | 6.155* | 9.019** |
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 3.43±0.09a | 2.23±0.03a | 1.87±0.12b | 1.19±0.03b | 0.61±0.05b |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 2.94±0.04a | 1.72±0.19a | 2.21±0.02ab | 1.93±0.04ab | 1.31±0.05b |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 2.49±0.06a | 1.87±0.07a | 1.68±0.04b | 1.66±0.04ab | 1.05±0.04bc |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 3.27±0.11a | 2.88±0.12a | 3.06±0.03a | 2.16±0.1a | 2.04±0.06a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 2.87±0.14a | 1.42±0.05a | 1.67±0.06b | 1.54±0.05ab | 1.21±0.01bc |
KWS9384 | 2.99±0.08a | 2.13±0.14a | 1.67±0.03b | 1.62±0.04ab | 1.59±0.01ab |
KWS3376 | 3.08±0.07a | 1.73±0.04a | 1.32±0.03b | 1.57±0.05ab | 1.1±0.01bc |
均值 Mean value | 3.01±0.09 | 2±0.12 | 1.92±0.1 | 1.67±0.07 | 1.27±0.08 |
F值 | 0.937ns | 1.696ns | 8.263** | 2.630ns | 9.989** |
Table 5
品种 Variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 3.43±0.09a | 2.23±0.03a | 1.87±0.12b | 1.19±0.03b | 0.61±0.05b |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 2.94±0.04a | 1.72±0.19a | 2.21±0.02ab | 1.93±0.04ab | 1.31±0.05b |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 2.49±0.06a | 1.87±0.07a | 1.68±0.04b | 1.66±0.04ab | 1.05±0.04bc |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 3.27±0.11a | 2.88±0.12a | 3.06±0.03a | 2.16±0.1a | 2.04±0.06a |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 2.87±0.14a | 1.42±0.05a | 1.67±0.06b | 1.54±0.05ab | 1.21±0.01bc |
KWS9384 | 2.99±0.08a | 2.13±0.14a | 1.67±0.03b | 1.62±0.04ab | 1.59±0.01ab |
KWS3376 | 3.08±0.07a | 1.73±0.04a | 1.32±0.03b | 1.57±0.05ab | 1.1±0.01bc |
均值 Mean value | 3.01±0.09 | 2±0.12 | 1.92±0.1 | 1.67±0.07 | 1.27±0.08 |
F值 | 0.937ns | 1.696ns | 8.263** | 2.630ns | 9.989** |
品种 variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 4.5±0.3a | 3.2±0.2b | 3±0a | 2.4±0.2b | 1.9±0.2b |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 4.5±0.3a | 4.7±0.4a | 3.5±0.3a | 3.2±0.2a | 2.9±0.2a |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 4.5±0.6a | 4±0.4ab | 3.5±0.3a | 2.4±0.3b | 2.1±0.4ab |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 4.6±0.7a | 3.5±0.4b | 3±0.2a | 2.8±0.3ab | 2.6±0.2ab |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 4.5±0.3a | 4±0.5ab | 2.9±0.6a | 2.7±0.2ab | 2.1±0.4ab |
KWS9384 | 4.8±0.4a | 4.1±0.4ab | 3.6±1.2a | 3.2±0.4a | 2.2±0.2ab |
KWS3376 | 4.1±0.6a | 3.2±0b | 3.1±0.1a | 2±0.2b | 1.8±0.4b |
均值 Mean value | 4.5±0.5 | 3.8±0.6 | 3.2±0.5 | 2.7±0.5 | 2.2±0.5 |
F值 | 0.490ns | 6.121** | 0.774ns | 7.393* | 4.782* |
Table 6
品种 variety | 盐分浓度Salt concentration | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0.6% | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.5% | |
KWS2564 | 4.5±0.3a | 3.2±0.2b | 3±0a | 2.4±0.2b | 1.9±0.2b |
新玉110号 Xinyu 110 | 4.5±0.3a | 4.7±0.4a | 3.5±0.3a | 3.2±0.2a | 2.9±0.2a |
新玉54号 Xinyu 54 | 4.5±0.6a | 4±0.4ab | 3.5±0.3a | 2.4±0.3b | 2.1±0.4ab |
新玉102号 Xinyu 102 | 4.6±0.7a | 3.5±0.4b | 3±0.2a | 2.8±0.3ab | 2.6±0.2ab |
新玉29号 Xinyu 29 | 4.5±0.3a | 4±0.5ab | 2.9±0.6a | 2.7±0.2ab | 2.1±0.4ab |
KWS9384 | 4.8±0.4a | 4.1±0.4ab | 3.6±1.2a | 3.2±0.4a | 2.2±0.2ab |
KWS3376 | 4.1±0.6a | 3.2±0b | 3.1±0.1a | 2±0.2b | 1.8±0.4b |
均值 Mean value | 4.5±0.5 | 3.8±0.6 | 3.2±0.5 | 2.7±0.5 | 2.2±0.5 |
F值 | 0.490ns | 6.121** | 0.774ns | 7.393* | 4.782* |
[1] |
Shabala S. Learning from halophytes: physiological basis and strategies to improve abiotic stress tolerance in crops[J]. Annals of Botany, 2013, 112( 7):1209-1221.
DOI PMID |
[2] | 田长彦, 买文选, 赵振勇. 新疆干旱区盐碱地生态治理关键技术研究[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(22):7064-7068. |
TIAN Changyan, MAI Wenxuan, ZHAO Zhenyong. Study on key technologies of ecological management of saline alkali land in arid area of Xinjiang[J]. ActaEcologica Sinica, 2016, 36(22):7064-7068. | |
[3] | 姜奇彦, 胡正, 张辉, 等. 大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定与研究[J] .植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(5):726-732. |
Jiang Qiyan, Hu Zheng, Zhang Hui, et al. Evaluation for salt tolerance in soy-bean cultivars[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2012, 13(5):726-732. | |
[4] | 袁海, 何鹏飞, 武君洁, 等. 盐胁迫对耐盐和盐敏感玉米幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(19):86-89 |
YUAN Hai, HE Pengfei, WU Junjie, et al. Effects of salt stress on growth and biological traits of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize seedlings[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(19):86-89 | |
[5] | 李文阳, 胡秀娟, 王长进, 等. 盐胁迫对不同品种玉米苗期生长与叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 生态科学, 2019, 38(2): 51-55. |
LI Wenyang, HU Xiujuan, WANG Changjin, et al. Effect of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in the seedling stage of different maize cultivars[J]. Ecological Science, 2019, 38(2): 51-55. | |
[6] | 邓杰, 孙丽芳, 王霞, 等. 89份玉米自交系萌发期耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4):15-21. |
DENG Jie, SUN Lifang, WANG Xia, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Alkalinity of 89 Maize Inbred Lines during Germination[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(4):15-21. | |
[7] | 刘燕, 杨伟, 马晖玲, 等. 盐胁迫对6种草地早熟禾幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(5):140-150,162. |
LIU Yan, YANG Wei, MA Huiling, et al. Effects of salt stress on seedling physiological characteristics of six kentucky bluegrass[J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2019, 54(5):140-150,162. | |
[8] | 王志恒, 魏玉清, 邹芳, 等. PEG-6000和盐碱胁迫对甜高粱种子萌发影响研究[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(5):39-43. |
WANG Zhiheng, WEI Yuqing, ZOU Fang, et al. Study on Effects of PEG-6000 and Saline-alkali Stress on Seed Germination of Sweet Sorghum[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(5):39-43. | |
[9] | 李源, 刘贵波, 高洪文, 等. 紫花苜蓿种质耐盐性综合评价及盐胁迫下的生理反应[J]. 草业学报. 2010, 19(4):79-86. |
LI Yuan, LIU Guibo, GAO Hongwen, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of salt-tolerance and the physiological response of medicago sativa at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(4): 79-86. | |
[10] | 张毅, 侯维海, 冯西博, 等. 有色大麦种质芽期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019,(20):1-10. |
ZHANG Yi, HOU Weihai, FENG Xibo, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance of colored barley germplasm during germination[J]. Journal of Plant Ge-netic Resources, 2019,(20): 1-10. | |
[11] | 高英波, 张慧, 薛艳芳, 等. 不同夏玉米品种耐盐性综合评价与耐盐品种筛选[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(2):33-40. |
GAO Yingbo, ZHANG Hui, XUE Yanfango, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Salt Tolerance and Screening for Salt Tolerance Accessions of Different Summer Maize Varieties[J]. Journalof Maize Sciences. 2020, 28(2):33-40. | |
[12] | 景宇鹏, 李跃进, 蔺亚莉, 等. 玉米耐Na2CO3胁迫的生理响应及耐盐碱性综合评价[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,(5):179-186. |
JING Yupeng, LI Yuejin, LIN Yali, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of physiological response and saline-alkali resistance of maize to Na2CO3 stress[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019,(5):179-186. | |
[13] | 刘丽丽, 乔梓启, 杜明, 等. 一种基于综合指标的耐盐方程式准确预测玉米耐盐性[J]. 植物生理学报, 2022, 58(2):458-468. |
LIU Lili, QIAO Ziqi, DU Ming, et al. A salt tolerance equation based on comprehensive indexes accurately predicts salt tolerance of maize inbred lines[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2022, 58(2):458-468. | |
[14] | 杨书华, 张春宵, 朴明鑫, 等. 69份玉米自交系的苗期耐盐碱性分析[J]. 种子, 2011, 30(3):1-6. |
YANG Shuhua, ZHANG Chunxiao, PIAO Mingxin, et al. Analysis on salt and alkaline tolerance of sixty-nine maize inbred lines at seedling stage[J]. Seed, 2011, 30(3): 1-6. | |
[15] | 张海艳, 赵海军. 不同品种玉米萌发期和苗期耐盐性综合评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2016, 24(5):61-67. |
ZHANG Haiyan, ZHAO Haijun. Comprehensive evaluation of salt toleranceof different corn varieties at the germination and seedling stages[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2016, 24(5): 61-67. |
[1] | SONG Bingmei, JIANG Yan, CHEN Xin, ZHANG Yu, CHENG Wannan, PAN Hongsheng. Evaluation of saline/alkali tolerance of new transgenic High-Yield cotton at germination and seedling stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247. |
[2] | JU Le, QI Juncang, CHEN Peiyu, NIU Yinting, YIN Zhigang. Effects of drought stress on seed germination, seedling growth and physiological characteristics of barley [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1879-1886. |
[3] | WANG Yan, WU Xingbao, QIN Xinhui, ZHANG Yongjiu, YANG Li, ZHAO Halin. Ecological stoichiometry of soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in farmland salinization in arid oasis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1996-2005. |
[4] | WANG Ting, ZHANG Li, ZHANG Fanfan, HUANG Rongzheng, LI Xiao, ZHANG Yulin, CHEN Yongcheng, ZHAO Jiantao, MA Chunhui. Poduction performance screening and nutritional value evaluation of corn varieties suitable for silage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605. |
[5] | LAN Chenyihang, YAO Yubo, ZHOU Junxiang, FU Kaiyun, DING Xinhua, YIN Xiaohui, LIU Wen, WANG Na, GUO Wenchao, DENF Jianyu. Research progress on sex pheromone identification and application of Asian corn borer [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1614-1622. |
[6] | XIAO Jing, LIU Ning, XU Minghai, ZHANG Jinbo, MA Yanming, WANG Li, XU Lin. Effect of NaCl stress on seed germination of Panicum miliaceum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1623-1629. |
[7] | LAI Hanlin, SHEN Yuyang, CHEN Li, YANG Hong, LI Yue, LEI Junjie, LI Guangkuo, GAO Haifeng. Effects of temperature and salt stress on seed germination characteristics of Descurainia sophia [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1326-1334. |
[8] | WANG Xingzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362. |
[9] | YAO Qing, Aribelegan Hazzetti, YANG Minghua, LI Qiang, MIAO Haocui, CUI Hongliang. Response of quinoa seeds to germination temperature and identification of germination ability under low temperature stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149. |
[10] | HOU Liangzhong, GUO Tongjun, ZHANG Junyu, SU Lingling, Guzalnur Amat, WEN Xiaoyan, ZHU Xiaofang, YANG Jianzhong, WANG Wenqi. Effect Evaluation of Mixed Storage of Different Proportions of Seed Pumpkin Waste and Corn Straw [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 567-573. |
[11] | LIU Wenhao, JIN Guili, WU Xueer, GONG Ke, HAN Wanqiang. Seed Morphology and Germination Characteristics of Bromus inermis at Different Seed Shattering Times [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(3): 727-734. |
[12] | FENG Caijun, SONG Ruijiao, SONG Lingyu, ZHANG Song, QI Juncang. Effects of 2, 4-Epbrassinolide Soaking on Seed Germination and Physiological Characteristics of Barley Seedlings under Drought Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 309-316. |
[13] | SONG Lingyu, QI Juncang, ZHANG Song, QIU Ying, SHANG Jifei, FENG Caijun. Effects of Different Silicon Treatments on Barley Germination under Drought Stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 317-325. |
[14] | YANG Jinyu, QIAO Xiaoyan, WANG Xihe, SUN Jiusheng. Effects of NaCl Stress on Seed Germination of Three Varieties of Forage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 448-453. |
[15] | ZHOU Xiaoyun, ZHANG Jungao, ZHOU Jiayu, LI Jin, QIN Bingshuang, LIANG Jing, GONG Jingyun, LEI Bin. Preliminary study on the effects of three plant extracts on cotton seed germination and seedling growth [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2902-2910. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||