Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (10): 2402-2410.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.008
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Cultivation Physiology·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics • Previous Articles Next Articles
WU Minhua(), WU Jiaying, YU Xinhua, ZHANG Kaixuan, LU Haibo, ZHAO Haichao, LIU Zigang, HUANG Zhihong()
Received:
2021-12-02
Online:
2022-10-20
Published:
2022-12-21
Correspondence author:
HUANG Zhihong
Supported by:
武敏桦(), 武佳颖, 俞新华, 张凯旋, 卢海博, 赵海超, 刘子刚, 黄智鸿()
通讯作者:
黄智鸿
作者简介:
武敏桦(1994-),女,河北张家口人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物高产栽培,(E-mail)206304575@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WU Minhua, WU Jiaying, YU Xinhua, ZHANG Kaixuan, LU Haibo, ZHAO Haichao, LIU Zigang, HUANG Zhihong. Effects of Yuhuangjin on Microstructure and Bending Strength of Spring Maize Stem[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(10): 2402-2410.
武敏桦, 武佳颖, 俞新华, 张凯旋, 卢海博, 赵海超, 刘子刚, 黄智鸿. 玉黄金对春玉米茎秆显微结构及抗折强度的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(10): 2402-2410.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.10.008
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 氨氮 Ammonia nitrogen (mg/kg) | 总氮 Total nitrogen (mg/kg) | 溶解性无机磷 Soluble inorganic phosphorus(mg/kg) | 总磷 Total phosphorus (mg/kg) | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 容重 Bulk density (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.56 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.65 | 17.61 | 0.82 |
20~40 | 7.57 | 0.68 | 0.95 | 0.48 | 19.81 | 0.83 |
Table 1 soil physical and chemical properties of experimental base of Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences
土层 Soil layer (cm) | 氨氮 Ammonia nitrogen (mg/kg) | 总氮 Total nitrogen (mg/kg) | 溶解性无机磷 Soluble inorganic phosphorus(mg/kg) | 总磷 Total phosphorus (mg/kg) | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 容重 Bulk density (g/cm3) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0~20 | 8.56 | 0.71 | 0.97 | 0.65 | 17.61 | 0.82 |
20~40 | 7.57 | 0.68 | 0.95 | 0.48 | 19.81 | 0.83 |
处理Handle | N(个) | Smax(μm2) | Smin(μm2) | Smean(μm2) | Rmax(μm) | Sx(μm2) | Sb(μm2) | E(μm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1M1T1 | 30±0.1h | 37 285±27e | 6 581±101c | 21 933±26e | 186±23c | 14 190±26c | 23 095±79e | 72±0.3d |
P1M1T2 | 37±0.2bc | 22 036±82i | 4 422±32i | 13 229±103i | 166±11f | 8 189±34i | 13 847±29i | 62±1.7f |
P2M1T1 | 32±0.1g | 30 307±37f | 5 613±23e | 17 960±58f | 186±10c | 13 684±57d | 16 623±111h | 69±1.1e |
P2M1T2 | 36±0.1cd | 18 756±103l | 3 797±38k | 11 277±37k | 149±12i | 6 833±22k | 11 923±102l | 60±0.1g |
P1M2T1 | 26±0.1j | 67 523±56a | 23 053±12a | 45 288±24a | 200±17a | 16 734±99a | 50 789±69a | 159±10a |
P1M2T2 | 35±0.2de | 57 841±131c | 5717±17d | 31 779±36c | 168±22e | 8 472±23g | 49 369±105b | 77±1.5c |
P2M2T1 | 28±0.3i | 60 173±113b | 7 374±23b | 33 773±105b | 194±11b | 15 887±130b | 44 286±101c | 150±13b |
P2M2T2 | 38±0.4b | 50 633±34d | 4 698±32g | 27 666±112d | 166±13f | 8 211±112h | 42 422±204d | 63±11f |
P1M3T1 | 34±0.3ef | 30 063±46g | 4 606±34h | 17 334±88g | 172±19d | 10 310±110e | 19 753±201f | 58±1.3h |
P1M3T2 | 33±0.2fg | 19 160±33j | 3 976±15j | 11 568±97j | 163±12g | 6 881±103j | 12 279±118h | 30±1.9i |
P2M3T1 | 29±0.1hi | 26 759±19h | 5 555±54f | 16 157±19h | 169±11e | 9 264±15f | 17 495±77g | 57±0.1h |
P2M3T2 | 42±0.1a | 19 035±23k | 3 249±16l | 11 142±59l | 154±13h | 6 698±89l | 12 337±89j | 29±0.1i |
平均值 Average value | 33 | 36 631 | 6 554 | 21 592 | 173 | 10 446 | 26 185 | 74 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 2.50 | 20 506.52 | 1 698.87 | 2.50 | 11 102.69 | 15.48 | 4 503.09 | 16 003.43 |
变异系数(%) Coefficient of variation | 7.50 | 55.98 | 25.92 | 7.50 | 51.42 | 8.96 | 43.11 | 61.12 |
T1平均值 T1 Average value | 30 | 42 018 | 8797 | 25 408 | 185 | 13 345 | 28 674 | 94 |
T2平均值 T2 Average value | 37 | 31 243 | 4 310 | 17 777 | 161 | 7 540 | 23 696 | 54 |
Table 2 Effect of "Yuhuangjin" on related characters of stem vascular bundle of Spring Maize
处理Handle | N(个) | Smax(μm2) | Smin(μm2) | Smean(μm2) | Rmax(μm) | Sx(μm2) | Sb(μm2) | E(μm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P1M1T1 | 30±0.1h | 37 285±27e | 6 581±101c | 21 933±26e | 186±23c | 14 190±26c | 23 095±79e | 72±0.3d |
P1M1T2 | 37±0.2bc | 22 036±82i | 4 422±32i | 13 229±103i | 166±11f | 8 189±34i | 13 847±29i | 62±1.7f |
P2M1T1 | 32±0.1g | 30 307±37f | 5 613±23e | 17 960±58f | 186±10c | 13 684±57d | 16 623±111h | 69±1.1e |
P2M1T2 | 36±0.1cd | 18 756±103l | 3 797±38k | 11 277±37k | 149±12i | 6 833±22k | 11 923±102l | 60±0.1g |
P1M2T1 | 26±0.1j | 67 523±56a | 23 053±12a | 45 288±24a | 200±17a | 16 734±99a | 50 789±69a | 159±10a |
P1M2T2 | 35±0.2de | 57 841±131c | 5717±17d | 31 779±36c | 168±22e | 8 472±23g | 49 369±105b | 77±1.5c |
P2M2T1 | 28±0.3i | 60 173±113b | 7 374±23b | 33 773±105b | 194±11b | 15 887±130b | 44 286±101c | 150±13b |
P2M2T2 | 38±0.4b | 50 633±34d | 4 698±32g | 27 666±112d | 166±13f | 8 211±112h | 42 422±204d | 63±11f |
P1M3T1 | 34±0.3ef | 30 063±46g | 4 606±34h | 17 334±88g | 172±19d | 10 310±110e | 19 753±201f | 58±1.3h |
P1M3T2 | 33±0.2fg | 19 160±33j | 3 976±15j | 11 568±97j | 163±12g | 6 881±103j | 12 279±118h | 30±1.9i |
P2M3T1 | 29±0.1hi | 26 759±19h | 5 555±54f | 16 157±19h | 169±11e | 9 264±15f | 17 495±77g | 57±0.1h |
P2M3T2 | 42±0.1a | 19 035±23k | 3 249±16l | 11 142±59l | 154±13h | 6 698±89l | 12 337±89j | 29±0.1i |
平均值 Average value | 33 | 36 631 | 6 554 | 21 592 | 173 | 10 446 | 26 185 | 74 |
标准差 Standard deviation | 2.50 | 20 506.52 | 1 698.87 | 2.50 | 11 102.69 | 15.48 | 4 503.09 | 16 003.43 |
变异系数(%) Coefficient of variation | 7.50 | 55.98 | 25.92 | 7.50 | 51.42 | 8.96 | 43.11 | 61.12 |
T1平均值 T1 Average value | 30 | 42 018 | 8797 | 25 408 | 185 | 13 345 | 28 674 | 94 |
T2平均值 T2 Average value | 37 | 31 243 | 4 310 | 17 777 | 161 | 7 540 | 23 696 | 54 |
处理Handle | 吐丝期 Tasseling | 花后16 d 16 days after pollination | 花后32 d 32 days after pollination | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆穿刺强度 Puncture strength | 茎秆压碎强度 Crushing strength | 茎秆穿刺强度 Puncture strength | 茎秆压碎强度 Crushing strength | 茎秆穿刺强度 Puncture strength | 茎秆压碎强度 Crushing strength | |
P1M1T1 | 28.45±2.13c | 223.93±8.21c | 50.95±14.71c | 331.55±10.05d | 36.17±15.31cd | 347.32±49.63e |
P1M1T2 | 20.35±12.31f | 193.53±17.20h | 38.88±11.23g | 316.23±21.37h | 34.00±10.07efg | 246.55±51.01k |
P2M1T1 | 25.10±7.61d | 216.98±51.37d | 56.75±21.03b | 345.83±16.35b | 44.33±22.01a | 435.57±20.09a |
P2M1T2 | 19.45±10.31f | 189.93±12.31i | 36.45±20.30h | 307.75±56.37i | 33.50±9.34fg | 427.48±83.51b |
P1M2T1 | 36.43±4.10a | 237.90±47.51a | 59.03±10.01a | 378.13±27.31a | 38.23±14.01b | 367.23±15.37c |
P1M2T2 | 20.35±2.31f | 200.58±13.01j | 45.55±21.03e | 321.90±67.01g | 34.40±15.36def | 296.37±67.21h |
P2M2T1 | 34.13±9.31b | 231.18±42.51b | 57.45±9.31ab | 337.20±23.79c | 37.37±8.37bc | 350.47±46.88d |
P2M2T2 | 22.23±1.21e | 187.58±12.41j | 42.53±7.34f | 326.45±15.1f | 31.70±10.02hi | 256.93±11.32i |
P1M3T1 | 24.18±1.11d | 203.05±32.417f | 49.00±21.01d | 336.25±16.30c | 32.57±11.31gh | 341.62±57.30f |
P1M3T2 | 19.10±0.23f | 180.00±13.71k | 35.55±1.21hi | 296.83±32.71j | 30.70±10.21ij | 249.52±49.31j |
P2M3T1 | 20.65±3.01ef | 207.18±31.01e | 46.93±21.03e | 329.78±24.30e | 35.50±11.07de | 334.15±63.27g |
P2M3T2 | 17.25±1.21g | 170.13±10.08l | 34.20±2.31i | 291.35±11.34k | 29.17±2.01j | 239.72±45.67l |
T1平均值 T1 Average value | 28.15 | 220.03 | 53.35 | 343.12 | 37.37 | 362.73 |
T2平均值 T2 Average value | 19.78 | 186.97 | 38.87 | 310.08 | 32.25 | 286.10 |
Table 3 Effect of "Yuhuangjin" on stem bending strength of spring maize (N/mm2)
处理Handle | 吐丝期 Tasseling | 花后16 d 16 days after pollination | 花后32 d 32 days after pollination | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆穿刺强度 Puncture strength | 茎秆压碎强度 Crushing strength | 茎秆穿刺强度 Puncture strength | 茎秆压碎强度 Crushing strength | 茎秆穿刺强度 Puncture strength | 茎秆压碎强度 Crushing strength | |
P1M1T1 | 28.45±2.13c | 223.93±8.21c | 50.95±14.71c | 331.55±10.05d | 36.17±15.31cd | 347.32±49.63e |
P1M1T2 | 20.35±12.31f | 193.53±17.20h | 38.88±11.23g | 316.23±21.37h | 34.00±10.07efg | 246.55±51.01k |
P2M1T1 | 25.10±7.61d | 216.98±51.37d | 56.75±21.03b | 345.83±16.35b | 44.33±22.01a | 435.57±20.09a |
P2M1T2 | 19.45±10.31f | 189.93±12.31i | 36.45±20.30h | 307.75±56.37i | 33.50±9.34fg | 427.48±83.51b |
P1M2T1 | 36.43±4.10a | 237.90±47.51a | 59.03±10.01a | 378.13±27.31a | 38.23±14.01b | 367.23±15.37c |
P1M2T2 | 20.35±2.31f | 200.58±13.01j | 45.55±21.03e | 321.90±67.01g | 34.40±15.36def | 296.37±67.21h |
P2M2T1 | 34.13±9.31b | 231.18±42.51b | 57.45±9.31ab | 337.20±23.79c | 37.37±8.37bc | 350.47±46.88d |
P2M2T2 | 22.23±1.21e | 187.58±12.41j | 42.53±7.34f | 326.45±15.1f | 31.70±10.02hi | 256.93±11.32i |
P1M3T1 | 24.18±1.11d | 203.05±32.417f | 49.00±21.01d | 336.25±16.30c | 32.57±11.31gh | 341.62±57.30f |
P1M3T2 | 19.10±0.23f | 180.00±13.71k | 35.55±1.21hi | 296.83±32.71j | 30.70±10.21ij | 249.52±49.31j |
P2M3T1 | 20.65±3.01ef | 207.18±31.01e | 46.93±21.03e | 329.78±24.30e | 35.50±11.07de | 334.15±63.27g |
P2M3T2 | 17.25±1.21g | 170.13±10.08l | 34.20±2.31i | 291.35±11.34k | 29.17±2.01j | 239.72±45.67l |
T1平均值 T1 Average value | 28.15 | 220.03 | 53.35 | 343.12 | 37.37 | 362.73 |
T2平均值 T2 Average value | 19.78 | 186.97 | 38.87 | 310.08 | 32.25 | 286.10 |
项目Item | N(个) | Smax(mm2) | Smin(mm2) | Smean(mm2) | Rmax(mm) | Sx(mm2) | Sb(mm2) | E(mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穿刺强度 Puncture strength | -0.760** | 0.661* | 0.657* | 0.703* | 0.951** | 0.970** | 0.524 | 0.829** |
压碎强度 Crushing strength | -0.672* | 0.385 | 0.520 | 0.443 | 0.659* | 0.759** | 0.260 | 0.632* |
Table 4 Correlation between vascular bundle and stem breaking strength
项目Item | N(个) | Smax(mm2) | Smin(mm2) | Smean(mm2) | Rmax(mm) | Sx(mm2) | Sb(mm2) | E(mm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穿刺强度 Puncture strength | -0.760** | 0.661* | 0.657* | 0.703* | 0.951** | 0.970** | 0.524 | 0.829** |
压碎强度 Crushing strength | -0.672* | 0.385 | 0.520 | 0.443 | 0.659* | 0.759** | 0.260 | 0.632* |
项目Item | N | Smin | Rmax | Sx | Sb | E |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
压碎强度直接系数 SCS Direct coefficient | -14.848 | 0.003 | 13.694 | 0.084 | 0.004 | 0.754 |
穿刺强度直接系数 RPR Direct coefficient | -0.614 | 0.001 | 0.046 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.029 |
Table 5 path analysis of correlation and node strength of stem vascular bundle
项目Item | N | Smin | Rmax | Sx | Sb | E |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
压碎强度直接系数 SCS Direct coefficient | -14.848 | 0.003 | 13.694 | 0.084 | 0.004 | 0.754 |
穿刺强度直接系数 RPR Direct coefficient | -0.614 | 0.001 | 0.046 | 0.005 | 0.003 | 0.029 |
[1] | 杨文飞, 贾艳艳, 文廷刚, 等. 新型调节剂稀施保对玉米植株性状的影响和增产效果[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(17): 100-103. |
YANG Wenfei, JIA Yanyan, WEN Tinggang, et al. Effect of new regulator on plant characters and yield increase of maize[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(17): 100-103. | |
[2] | 田晓东. 乙烯利对夏玉米抗倒伏能力的影响研究[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2014. |
TIAN Xiaodong. Effect of Ethephon on Lodging Resistance of Summer Maize[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[3] | 付华, 李猛, 刘兴舟, 等. 不同种植密度下玉米品种倒伏与产量的相关分析[J]. 作物研究, 2019, 33(6): 534-537. |
FU Hua, LI Meng, LIU Xingzhou, et al. Correlation analysis between lodging and yield of Maize Varieties under different planting densities[J]. Crop Research, 2019, 33(6): 534-537. | |
[4] | 许莹莹, 马青美, 宋希云, 等. 不同玉米品种倒伏抗性与产量相关性状的聚类和相关分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(5): 15-21. |
XU Yingying, MA Qingmei, SONG Xiyun, et al. Cluster analysis and correlation analysis of lodging resistance and Yield Related Traits in Different Maize Varieties[J]. Corn Science, 2019, 27(5): 15-21. | |
[5] | 宋朝玉, 张继余, 张清霞, 等. 玉米倒伏的类型、原因及预防、治理措施[J]. 作物杂志, 2006,(1): 36-38. |
SONG Chaoyu, ZHANG Jiyu, ZHANG Qingxia, et al. Types, causes, prevention and control measures of maize lodging[J]. Crop Magazine, 2006,(1): 36-38. | |
[6] | 唐玉凤, 陈平平, 易镇邪, 等. 玉米倒伏影响因素及其化学调控研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2020, 34(2): 183-189. |
TANG Yufeng, CHEN Pingping, YI Zhenxie, et al. Research Progress on influencing factors and chemical regulation of maize lodging[J]. Crop Research, 2020, 34(2): 183-189. | |
[7] | 刘志铭, 盖旭东, 李宝玉, 等. 化控对高密度春玉米抗倒伏能力及产量的影响[J]. 东北农业科学, 2019, 44(6): 1-5. |
LIU Zhiming, GAI Xudong, LI Baoyu, et al. Effect of chemical control on lodging resistance and yield of high density Spring Maize[J]. Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 44(6): 1-5. | |
[8] | 郑迎霞, 陈杜, 魏鹏程, 等. 种植密度对贵州春玉米茎秆抗倒伏性能及籽粒产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020,(7): 1-15. |
ZHENG Yingxia, CHEN Du, WEI Pengcheng, et al. Effects of planting density on stem lodging resistance and grain yield of Spring Maize in Guizhou[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020,(7): 1-15. | |
[9] | Integrative Agriculture; New Findings in Integrative Agriculture Described from Shihezi University (Key Indicators Affecting Maize Stalk Lodging Resistance of Different Growth Periods Under Different Sowing Dates)[J]. Agriculture Week, 2020. |
[10] |
Qwa B, Jx B, Jlc C, et al. Key indicators affecting maize stalk lodging resistance of different growth periods under different sowing dates[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(10):2419-2428.
DOI |
[11] | 魏湜, 杨振芳, 顾万荣, 等. 化控剂玉黄金对玉米品种东农253穗部和抗倒性影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2015, 46(12): 1-15. |
WEI Shi, YANG Zhenfang, GU Wanrong, et al. Effect of chemical control agent Yuhuangjin on ear and lodging resistance of maize variety Dongnong 253[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2015, 46(12): 1-15. | |
[12] | 席凯鹏, 席吉龙, 杨娜, 等. 玉黄金化控对玉米抗倒性及产量的影响[J]. 山西农业科学, 2017, 45(6): 993-995. |
XI Kaipeng, XI Jilong, YANG Na, et al. Effect of chemical control of Yuhuangjin on lodging resistance and yield of Maize[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(6): 993-995. | |
[13] | 李彦昌, 侯现军, 张文波, 等. 不同时期与种植密度化控对夏玉米的影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(19): 15-20. |
LI Yanchang, HOU Xianjun, ZHANG Wenbo, et al. Study on the effect of different period and planting density on Summer Maize[J]. Chinese Agronomy Bulletin, 2019, 35(19): 15-20. | |
[14] | 田再民, 黄智鸿, 赵海超, 等. 玉黄金化控对不同种植密度下玉米抗倒伏性和产量构成因素的影响[J]. 河北农业科学, 2019, 23(5): 51-82. |
TIAN Zimin, HUANG Zhihong, ZHAO Haichao, et al. Effects of Yuhuangjin chemical control on lodging resistance and yield components of Maize under different planting densities[J]. Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 23(5): 51-82. | |
[15] | 姚敏娜. 不同耐密型玉米品种群体光分布与茎秆形态解剖结构及抗倒伏关系的研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2013. |
YAO Minna. Study on the relationship between population light distribution, stem morphology, anatomical structure and lodging resistance of different density tolerant maize varieties[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2013. | |
[16] | 王立新, 郭强, 苏青, 等. 玉米抗倒性与茎秆显微结构的关系[J]. 植物学通报, 1990,(3): 34-36. |
WANG Lixin, GUO Qiang, SU Qing, et al. Relationship between lodging resistance and stem microstructure in Maize[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1990,(3): 34-36. | |
[17] | 杜宇茜. 玉米茎秆维管束相关性状QTL定位[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2018. |
DU Yuxi. QTL mapping of stem vascular bundle related traits in Maize[D]. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[18] | 冯海娟. 夏玉米维管束系统结构与功能特性对种植密度的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014. |
FENG Haijuan. Effects of vascular system structure and functional characteristics on planting density of Summer Maize[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[19] | 冯素伟, 姜小苓, 胡铁柱, 等. 不同小麦品种茎秆显微结构与抗倒强度关系研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(36): 57-62. |
FENG Suwei, JIANG Xiaoling, HU Tiezhu, et al. Relationship between stem microstructure and lodging resistance of Different Wheat Varieties[J]. Chinese Agricultural Bulletin, 2012, 28(36): 57-62. | |
[20] | 杨霞, 王红娟, 徐文静, 等. 不同抗倒性小麦品种的茎秆结构及其化学成分和力学特性分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2012, 46(4): 370-373. |
YANG Xia, WANG Hongjuan, XU Wenjing, et al. Analysis of stem structure, chemical composition and mechanical properties of wheat varieties with different lodging resistance[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2012, 46(4): 370-373. | |
[21] | 刘唐兴, 官春云, 黎移新. 甘蓝型油菜主茎显微结构与抗倒性关系的初步研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(5): 139-143. |
LIU tangxing, GUAN Chunyun, LI Yixin. Preliminary study on the relationship between microstructure of main stem and lodging resistance in Brassica napus L[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(5): 139-143. | |
[22] | 杨艳华, 朱镇, 张亚东, 等. 水稻茎秆解剖结构与抗倒伏能力的研究[J]. 广西植物, 2012, 32(6): 834-839. |
YANG Yanhua, ZHU Zhen, ZHANG Yadong, et al. Anatomical structure and lodging resistance of rice stem[J]. Guangxi Plants, 2012, 32(6): 834-839. | |
[23] | 陈建辉. 玉米防倒增产化学调控技术研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2014. |
CHEN Jianhui. Study on chemical control technology of maize lodging control and yield increase[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2014. | |
[24] | 马延华, 孙德全, 李绥艳, 等. 玉米茎皮抗穿刺强度与形态性状和化学成分含量间的相关分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2012,(4): 1-4. |
MA Yanhua, SUN Dequan, LI Suiyan, et al. Correlation analysis between puncture resistance and morphological characters and chemical composition content of maize stem Bark[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2012,(4): 1-4. | |
[25] | 徐艳荣, 仲义, 代秀云, 等. 东北地区玉米育种存在问题及解决方法[J]. 东北农业科学, 2020, 45(4): 21-24. |
XU Yanrong, ZHONG Yi, DAI Xiuyun, et al. Problems and solutions of Maize Breeding in Northeast China[J]. Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 45(4): 21-24. | |
[26] | 王昕. 乙烯利-胺鲜酯(玉黄金)对春玉米不同器官的调节效应[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019. |
WANG Xin. Regulatory effects of ethephonprochloraz (Yuhuangjin) on different organs of Spring Maize[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019. | |
[27] | 杨振芳. 玉黄金对不同密度下春玉米调控效应的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2016. |
YANG Zhenfang. Study on regulation effect of Yuhuangjin on Spring Maize under different density[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2016. | |
[28] | 杨德光, 马德志, 于乔乔, 等. 玉米倒伏的影响因素及抗倒伏性研究进展[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(7): 28-38. |
YANG Deguang, MA Dezhi, YU Qiaoqiao, et al. Research Progress on influencing factors and lodging resistance of Maize[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2020, 25(7): 28-38. | |
[29] |
任佰朝, 李利利, 董树亭, 等. 种植密度对不同株高夏玉米品种茎秆性状与抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(12): 1864-1872.
DOI |
REN Baichao, LI Li, DONG Shuting, et al. Effects of planting density on stem traits and lodging resistance of summer maize varieties with different plant height[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(12): 1864-1872.
DOI |
|
[30] | 姚敏娜, 施志国, 薛军, 等. 种植密度对玉米茎秆皮层结构及抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(11): 2006-2014. |
YAO Minna, SHI Zhiguo, XUE Jun, et al. Effects of planting density on stem cortex structure and lodging resistance of maize[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 50(11): 2006-2014. | |
[31] | 穆春华, 张发军, 李文才, 等. 玉米自交系茎秆显微结构及其与茎节抗折强度的相关与通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(5): 71-75. |
MU Chunhua, ZHANG Fajun, LI Wencai, et al. Correlation and path analysis between stem microstructure and stem node bending strength of Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Jouirnal of Maize Science, 2012, 20(5): 71-75. | |
[32] | 杨硕, 郑云霄, 黄亚群, 等. 不同玉米自交系茎秆上部维管束数目的差异分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 24(5): 1-14. |
YANG Shuo, ZHENG Yunxiao, HUANG Yaqun, et al. Analysis on the difference of the number of vascular bundles in the upper stem of Different Maize Inbred Lines[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 24(5): 1-14. | |
[33] | 王庭杰, 张亮, 韩琼, 等. 玉米茎秆细胞壁和组织构建对抗压强度的影响[J]. 植物科学学报, 2015, 33(1): 109-115. |
WANG Tingjie, ZHANG Liang, HAN Qiong, et al. Effect of cell wall and tissue construction on compressive strength of corn stalk[J]. Acta Botanica Sinica, 2015, 33(1): 109-115. | |
[34] | 王群瑛, 胡昌浩. 玉米茎秆抗倒特性的解剖研究[J]. 作物学报, 1991, 17(1):70-75. |
WANG Qunying, HU Changhao. Anatomical study on Lodging Resistance of corn stalk[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1991, 17(1):70-75. | |
[35] |
Kong E Y, Liu D C, Guo X L, Anatomical and chemical characteristics associated with lodging resistance in wheat[J]. The Crop Journal, 2013, 1(1): 43-49.
DOI URL |
[36] | 刘明, 齐华, 张卫建, 等. 深松方式与施氮量对玉米茎秆解剖结构及倒伏的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2013, 21(1): 57-63. |
LIU Ming, QI Hua, ZHANG Weijian, et al. Effects of subsoiling methods and nitrogen application rate on anatomical structure and lodging of maize stalk[J]. Jouirnal of Maize Science, 2013, 21(1): 57-63. |
[1] | WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, GAO Wenju, LONG Yilei, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[3] | CAO Yijie, Aishajiang maimaiti, Xianmisiya Tayifu, SHI Zhiyong, Yusufu Abulitifu. Comparison of fruit stalk difference between different types of Korla fragrant pear [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1442-1450. |
[4] | HUANG Qiannan, Maerheba Aisibaier, ZOU Hui, WANG Cairong, Ailimaimaiti Kuerban, SUN Na, LEI Junjie. Genetic diversity of main agronomic traits in Xinjiang winter wheat germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1050-1058. |
[5] | SANG Zhiwei, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, CHEN Quanjia. Analysis of mechanical harvesting characters of germplasm resources of different upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098. |
[6] | LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109. |
[7] | LI Shuo, WANG Juan, Nigary Yadikar, ZHU Jinfang, FENG Zuoshan, Parhat Ainiwaer. Functional components changes of different apricot cultivars in different development stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1200-1207. |
[8] | DU Hongyan, PANG Shengqun, MA Haixiang, JI Xuehua. Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 943-950. |
[9] | MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[10] | HOU Zhixiong, JING Changqing, CHEN Chen, WANG Gongxin, GUO Wenzhang, ZHAO Weikang. Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Coverage of Natural Grassland in Northern Xinjiang in Recent 20 Years and Its Relationship with Meteorological Factors [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 464-471. |
[11] | WANG Jiayong, LI Chunmei, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHANG Na, LI Ling, MA Yunzhen, WANG Fang. Effects of planting density on canopy structure, canopy temperature and humidity and yield of 76 cm machine-picked cotton with equal row spacing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2609-2617. |
[12] | WANG Haitao, LIU Cunjing, TANG Liyuan, ZHANG Sujun, CAI Xiao, LI Xinghe, MA Wenna, HAN Junwei, ZHANG Xiangyun, ZHANG Jianhong. The influence of different planting densities on agronomic traits, yield and quality of machine-picked cotton varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2638-2645. |
[13] | ZHAO Yun, FENG Guojun, HU Xiangwei, LI Cuimei, LI Pengbing, Akbota Muheyati, BAI Ling. Analysis of main agronomic characters and yield of different replanted millet varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2453-2460. |
[14] | YANG Minghua, WANG Qian, ZHOU Xinli, Aihemaitijiang Mahemuti, PEN Yuncheng, Aierjuma Tuluhan, Buayxam Namat, HOU Lili, LIU Qiang. Multiple Analysis on Character and Yield of Maize Hybrid Combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122. |
[15] | LI Yueyan, LI Yushan, WANG Fan, GUO Yawen, WANG Feiyan, GAO Jie, SONG Yu. Genetic Diversity and Cluster Analysis of Tomato Fruit Characters in Different Varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2147-2157. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||