不同灌水定额对膜下滴灌玉米生长的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.04.008

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (4): 653-662.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.04.008

• 土壤肥料·植物保护·微生物 • 上一篇下一篇

不同灌水定额对膜下滴灌玉米生长的影响

赵经华¹, 胡建强¹, 杨磊², 胡文军³, 彭艳平²

1.新疆农业大学水利与土木工程学院,乌鲁木齐 830052;
2.中国能源建设集团新疆电力设计院有限公司,乌鲁木齐 83000;
3.新疆巴音郭楞蒙古自治州若羌县红枣科技服务中心,新疆若羌 841800

收稿日期:2020-04-15 出版日期:2021-04-20 发布日期:2021-04-25
作者简介:赵经华(1979-),男,新疆奇台人,副教授,博士,硕士生导师,研究方向为节水灌溉,(E-mail)105512275@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金面上项目(2019D01A40);“水利工程”重点学科研究项目(SLXK-YJS-2018-02)

Comparative Analysis of Different Irrigation Quotas on Maize Growth in Drip Irrigation under Mulch

ZHAO Jinghua¹, HU Jianqiang¹, YANG Lei², HU Wenjun³, PENG Yanping²

1. College of Water Conservancy and Civil Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China;
2. Xinjiang Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Energy Construction Group, Urumqi 83000, China;
3, Jujube Science and Technology Service Center, Ruoqiang County, Bayingol Mongolian Autonomous Prefecture, Ruoqiang Xinjiang 841800, China

Received:2020-04-15 Online:2021-04-20 Published:2021-04-25
Correspondence author: ZHAO Jinghua(1979-), male, Ph.D. professor. Research area: mainly engaged in water-saving irrigation technology research and teaching, (E-mail)105512275@qq.com
Supported by:
General Project of Natural Science Foundation of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2019D01A40); Key Discipline Research Project of "Water Conservancy Project" (SLXK-YJS-2018-02)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 对比分析水分利用效率法、层次分析法(AHP)和优化AHP法对灌溉制度评价的特点与优劣。【方法】 采用大田试验和膜下滴灌技术,以灌水定额为变量(30.0、37.5、45.0、52.5和60.0 mm),分析水分利用效率法以及优化前后层次分析法(AHP)确定灌水定额的合理性。【结果】 水分利用效率法能大致确定45.0~52.5 mm灌水定额范围适宜膜下滴灌玉米的生长,为追求最优的产量与水分利用率只能定性的确定52.5 mm灌水定额适宜膜下滴灌玉米的生长发育。传统AHP法的评价结果能确定最优且唯一的评价值,成对比较矩阵经本领域专家多次赋值后得到层次总排序权向量Z=(0.041,0.086,0.422,0.250,0.200),即45.0 mm灌水定额适宜膜下滴灌玉米的生长。优化AHP法不仅保留传统AHP法的优点而且结合水分利用效率法弥补了其缺点,加强因素间及层次间的联系性,规避主观判断与定性分析,52.5 mm灌水定额最适宜膜下滴灌玉米生长。【结论】 优化AHP法的评价结果与传统AHP法及水分利用效率法相比更加清晰、客观、科学。

关键词: 灌水定额; 对比分析; 膜下滴灌; 玉米

Abstract: 【Objective】 To compare and analyze the characteristics and advantages of water use efficiency method, analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and optimize the AHP method in evaluating irrigation system in the hope of seeking scientific and reasonable evaluation method. 【Methods】 Under field experiment conditions, irrigation quota was used as variables (30.0, 37.5, 45.0, 52.5 and 60.0 mm) to analyze the scientific rationality of water use efficiency method and irrigation quota determined by AHP before and after optimization. 【Results】 The water use efficiency method could approximately determine the 45.0-52.5 mm irrigation quota range suitable for the growth of drip irrigation maize under mulch, but in order to pursue the optimal yield and water use efficiency, 52.5 mm irrigation quota could be determined qualitatively suitable for the growth and development of maize under mulch drip irrigation. The evaluation results of traditional AHP method could determine the best and only evaluation value. The total hierarchy permutation weight vector Z= (0.041, 0.086, 0.422, 0.250, 0.200) was obtained through pairwise comparison matrix which experts in this field evaluated many times. That 45.0 mm irrigation quota was suitable for the growth of drip irrigation maize under mulch. Optimized AHP method not only retained the advantages of traditional AHP method, but also combined water use efficiency method to make up for its shortcomings. It strengthened the relationship between factors and levels, avoided subjective judgment and qualitative analysis. The evaluation results could scientifically and reasonably determine that the 52.5 mm irrigation quota was the most suitable for the growth of drip irrigation maize under mulch. 【Conclusion】 Compared with the traditional AHP method and the water use efficiency method, the evaluation results of the optimized AHP method are more clear, objective, and scientific. It also provides a scientific theoretical basis for the objective evaluation and decision-making of various problems in the future.

Key words: comparative analysis; evaluation method; drip irrigation under mulch; maize

中图分类号:

S274.1
S513

赵经华, 胡建强, 杨磊, 胡文军, 彭艳平. 不同灌水定额对膜下滴灌玉米生长的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(4): 653-662.

ZHAO Jinghua, HU Jianqiang, YANG Lei, HU Wenjun, PENG Yanping. Comparative Analysis of Different Irrigation Quotas on Maize Growth in Drip Irrigation under Mulch[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(4): 653-662.

参考文献 29

[1]	强小嫚, 张凯, 米兆荣, 等. 黄淮海平原地区深松和灌水次数对冬小麦-夏玉米节水增产的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(3): 491-502.QIANG Xiaoman, ZHANG Kai, MI Zhaorong, et al. The effect of deep loosening and irrigation times on water saving and yield increasing of winter wheat summer maize in Huang Huaihai Plain [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(3): 491-502.
[2]	杨应迪, 程建圣, 秦汝祥. 基于主观赋值法评价的数据处理对比分析研究[J]. 矿业安全与环保, 2008,(4):63-65, 68.YANG Yingdi, CHENG Jiansheng, QIN Ruxiang. Comparative analysis of data processing based on the evaluation of subjective evaluation method [J]. Mining Safety and Environmental Protection, 2008,(4): 63-65, 68
[3]	张发明, 刘志平. 组合评价方法研究综述[J]. 系统工程学报, 2017,32(4):557-569.ZHANG Faming, LIU Zhiping. Review of combinatorial evaluation methods [J].Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(4): 557-569.
[4]	李美娟, 徐林明, 陈国宏. 基于一致性的动态组合评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(10):149-155.LI Meijuan, XU Linming, CHEN Guohong. Research on dynamic combination evaluation method based on consistency [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(10): 149-155.
[5]	李柏洲, 尹士. 基于一致性的制造业企业伙伴选择多属性决策模型研究—合作创新视角[J]. 运筹与管理, 2018,27(6):6-13.LI Bozhou, YIN Shi. Consistency-based Multi-attribute Decision-making Model for Partner Selection in Manufacturing Enterprises: Perspective of Cooperative Innovation [J]. Operational Research and Management Science, 2018, 27(6): 6-13.
[6]	彭张林, 张强, 王素凤, 等. 基于评价结论的二次组合评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016,24(9):156-164.PENG Zhanglin, ZHANG Qiang, WANG Sufeng, et al. Study on the second combination evaluation method based on the evaluation conclusion [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(9): 156-164.
[7]	秦海霞, 张玉顺, 邱新强, 等. 灌水定额对夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2019,(4):62-68.QIN Haixia, ZHANG Yushun, QIU Xinqiang, et al. Effects of irrigation quota on growth and yield of summer maize [J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2019,(4): 62-68.
[8]	刘信, 何沛祥. 基于权函数的桥梁结构有限元模型修正[J]. 工业建筑, 2018,48(2):95-99, 68.LIU Xin, HE Peixiang. Modification of finite element model of bridge structure based on weight function [J]. Industrial Construction, 2018, 48(2): 95-99, 68.
[9]	李静, 张富仓, 方栋平, 等. 水氮供应对滴灌施肥条件下黄瓜生长及水分利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014,47(22):4475-4487.LI Jing, ZHANG Fuchang, FANG Dongping, et al. Effects of water and nitrogen supply on cucumber growth and water use under drip irrigation and fertilization [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(22): 4475-4487.
[10]	李娟, 李军, 程科, 等. 渭北旱塬玉米田保护性轮耕土壤固碳效果与增产增收效应[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(5):104-111.LI Juan, LI Jun, CHENG Ke, et al. Carbon sequestration effect and yield-increasing and income-increasing effect of conservation rotation tillage in maize field in Weibei dryland [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(5): 104-111.
[11]	陈丽娜, 方沩, 司海平, 等. 国家农作物种质资源平台服务绩效评价体系构建[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(13):2459-2468.CHEN Lina, FANG Wei, SI Haiping, et al. Construction of service performance evaluation system of National Crop Germplasm Resources Platform [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(13): 2459-2468.
[12]	邱瑞瑾, 陈静, 雷翔, 等. 引入核心指标集概念构建中医临床疗效模糊综合评价方法[J]. 中药新药与临床药理, 2018,29(4):528-534.QIU Ruijin, CHEN Jing, LEI Xiang, et al. Introduced the concept of core indicator set to construct a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine [J]. Traditional Chinese Drug Research and Clinical Pharmacology, 2018, 29(4): 528-534.
[13]	王元放, 俞晓安, 薛阳, 等. 基于层次分析法的信息化项目评估模型[J]. 计算机工程, 2007,(8):68-70.WANG Yuanfang, YU Xiaoan, XUE Yang, et al. Information project evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process [J]. Computer Engineering, 2007,(8): 68-70.
[14]	李旭辉, 胡笑梅, 汪鑫. 高校创新创业教育效果评价体系研究—基于群组G1法的分析[J]. 教育发展研究, 2016,36(21):29-36.LI Xuhui, HU Xiaomei, WANG Xin. Research on the Evaluation System of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Education in Colleges and Universities Based on Group G1 Method [J]. Research in Education Development, 2016, 36(21): 29-36.
[15]	刘大海, 宫伟, 邢文秀, 等. 基于AHP-熵权法的海岛海岸带脆弱性评价指标权重综合确定方法[J]. 海洋环境科学, 2015,34(3):462-467.LIU Dahai, GONG Wei, XING Wenxiu, et al. A comprehensive method for determining the weights of vulnerability evaluation indexes of island and coastal zone based on AHP-entropy weight method [J].Marine Environmental Science, 2015, 34(3): 462-467.
[16]	杨灯, 杨永清. 基于改进AHP法的桥梁加固方案灰关联度优选分析[J]. 四川建筑, 2017,37(6):148-150.YANG Deng, YANG Yongqing. Grey relational degree optimization analysis of bridge reinforcement schemes based on improved AHP method [J]. Sichuan Architecture, 2017, 37(6): 148-150.
[17]	金成. 基于主观度的双组合评价方法及应用[J]. 统计与决策, 2018,34(19):76-79.JIN Cheng. Bi-combination evaluation method based on subjectivity and its application [J]. Statistics and Decision, 2018, 34(19): 76-79.
[18]	LI Changling, MIAO Xujuan, ZHANG Chao, et al. Research on benefit evaluation method of integrated energy system project based on combination weight[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2019, 227(4).
[19]	Salari M, Shariat S M, Rahimi R, et al. Land capability evaluation for identifying industrial zones: combination multi-criteria decision-making method with geographic information system[J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2019, 16(10).
[20]	胡建强, 赵经华, 马英杰, 等. 不同灌水定额对膜下滴灌玉米的生长、产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2018, 29(5):249-254.HU Jianqiang, ZHAO Jinghua, MA Yingjie, et al. Effects of different irrigation quotas on growth, yield and water use efficiency of drip irrigation maize under mulch [J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2018, 29(5): 249-254.
[21]	胡建强, 赵经华, 马英杰, 等. 不同灌水定额对膜下滴灌玉米耗水及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2018,41(1):67-71.HU Jianqiang, ZHAO Jinghua, MA Yingjie, et al. Effects of different irrigation quotas on water consumption and yield of drip irrigation maize under mulch [J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018, 41(1): 67-71.
[22]	叶霜, 熊博, 邱霞, 等. 果实品质综合评价体系的建立及其在黄果柑果实上的应用[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2017, 29(12):2038-2050.YE Shuang, XIONG Bo, QIU Xia, et al. Establishment of a comprehensive evaluation system for fruit quality and its application in Huangguo citrus fruit [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2017, 29(12): 2038-2050.
[23]	李发永, 劳东青, 孙三民, 等. 滴灌对间作枣棉光合特性与水分利用的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016,47(12):119-129.LI Fayong, LAO Dongqing, SUN Sanmin, et al. Effects of drip irrigation on Photosynthetic Characteristics and water use of intercropped jujube and cotton [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2016, 47(12): 119-129.
[24]	张忠学, 陈帅宏, 陈鹏, 等. 基于稳定碳同位素的寒地黑土区玉米水分利用效率研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018,49(8):265-274.ZHANG Zhongxue, CHEN Shuaihong, CHEN Peng, et al. Study on water use efficiency of Maize in cold black soil region based on s Table carbon isotope [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(8): 265-274.
[25]	曾爱国. 灌水量对全膜垄作沟灌玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(2):207-212.ZENG Aiguo. Effects of irrigation amount on Yield and water use efficiency of Maize under full-film ridge furrow irrigation [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(2): 207-212.
[26]	王俊岭, 吴宾, 徐怡, 等. 改进AHP法优化供水绩效指标权重研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2019,39(9):49-55.WANG Junling, WU Bin, XU Yi, et al. Research on Improving AHP Method to Optimize Weight of Water Supply Performance Indicators [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2019, 39(9): 49-55.
[27]	杨帆, 杨士林. 层次分析法的改进及其在环境空气质量评价中的应用[J]. 环境工程, 2016,34(S1):887-889, 930.YANG Fan, YANG Shilin. Improvement of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Application in Environmental Air Quality Assessment [J]. Environmental Engineering, 2016, 34(S1): 887-889, 930.
[28]	王晓峰, 王纪红, 赵璐. 基于AHP法的区域经济影响定量评价—以南水北调中线陕西水源区为例[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,40(1):136-140.WANG Xiaofeng, WANG Jihong, ZHAO Lu. Quantitative Evaluation of Regional Economic Impact Based on AHP Method - Taking Shaanxi Water Source Area of the Middle Route of South-to-North Water Transfer as an Example [J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Ed.), 2010, 40(1): 136-140.
[29]	王伟明, 徐海燕. 考虑决策者风险规避的学术期刊选定评价模型[J]. 情报杂志, 2019,38(8):159-164, 187.WANG Weiming, XU Haiyan. Academic Journal Selection Evaluation Model Considering Risk Avoidance of Policymakers [J]. Journal of Information, 2019, 38(8): 159-164, 187.

不同灌水定额对膜下滴灌玉米生长的影响

Comparative Analysis of Different Irrigation Quotas on Maize Growth in Drip Irrigation under Mulch

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 29

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[2]	陈占辉, 孙强, 任姣姣, 黄博文, 许加波, 杨杰, 吴鹏昊. 玉米叶宽的QTL定位及全基因组选择分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1606-1613.
[3]	蓝陈仪航, 姚禹博, 周俊祥, 付开赟, 丁新华, 尹晓辉, 刘文, 王娜, 郭文超, 邓建宇. 亚洲玉米螟性信息素鉴定及其应用研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1614-1622.
[4]	邵盘霞, 赵准, 邵武奎, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 李建平, 胡文冉, 黄全生. 玉米ZmCDPK22基因在干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1372-1378.
[5]	陆晏天, 桑志勤, 徐灿, 张力, 夏春兰, 王友德, 李伟, 陈树宾. 历年新疆和宁夏审定玉米品种主要性状的演化及品种审定现状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1379-1388.
[6]	江柱, 张江辉, 白云岗, 杨鹏年, 刘洪波, 肖军, 刘旭辉. 膜下咸水滴灌水肥盐调控对棉花生长及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1389-1397.
[7]	杨明花, 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山. 不完全双列杂交玉米组合抗倒伏综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
[8]	周广威, 韩登旭, 朱琦, 张少民. 耐低磷新疆春玉米基因型筛选及其磷效率[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 847-856.
[9]	陈果, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 胡文冉, 赵准, 黄全生. 玉米钙依赖蛋白激酶全基因组鉴定及抗旱表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 857-864.
[10]	董秀丽, 韩登旭, 杨杰, 阿布来提·阿布拉, 戴爱梅, 李俊杰, 王业建, 刘俊, 郗浩江, 梁晓玲, 李铭东. 密植条件下玉米主要农艺性状的综合性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 865-871.
[11]	侯良忠, 郭同军, 张俊瑜, 苏玲玲, 古再丽努尔·艾麦提, 温小燕, 朱晓芳, 杨建中, 王文奇. 不同比例籽用西葫芦皮瓤与玉米秸秆混贮效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 567-573.
[12]	段燕燕, 胡静, 祁炳琴, 潘志远, 吴昊楠, 勾玲. 正反交对玉米杂交种茎秆抗倒伏性能及种植密度的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 2949-2961.
[13]	张伟, 靳范, 李谦绪, 张俊三, 翟修萍, 王善博. 玉米籽粒联合收获机清选装置优化设计与试验[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(12): 3102-3112.
[14]	唐怀君, 谢小清, 张磊, 孙宝成, 杨杰, 刘成. 283份玉米田间抗旱性鉴定与筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2687-2693.
[15]	丁宇, 张江辉, 白云岗, 赵经华, 郑明, 刘洪波, 肖军, 韩政宇. 不同水分处理干播湿出水热盐效应对棉花出苗率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2380-2389.