新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 832-840.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.006
杨明花(), 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山
收稿日期:
2022-07-29
出版日期:
2023-04-20
发布日期:
2023-05-06
作者简介:
杨明花(1983-),女,四川威远人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为玉米遗传育种及栽培,(E-mail)xjymh123@163.com
基金资助:
YANG Minghua(), LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan
Received:
2022-07-29
Online:
2023-04-20
Published:
2023-05-06
Correspondence author:
YANG Minghua(1983-),female,Master candidate,Associate researcher,Weiyuan,Sichuan Provinae;research direction:Maize genetic breeding and cultivation,(E-mail)Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究36份玉米杂交组合产量性状与茎秆力学倒伏综合评价,筛选出抗倒伏强的品种。【方法】以 4 份玉米自交系为测验种,9 份玉米高代系为待测系,采用 NCⅡ不完全双列杂交组配设计,对其茎秆性状及产量性状进行相关性、主成分、隶属函数、聚类分析,综合评价36个杂交组合的产量因子和茎秆性状。【结果】不同玉米杂交组合单株粒重与基部第3节穿刺强度、穗下第1节穿刺强度、基部第4节弯曲强度、穗下第1节弯曲强度和茎秆抗推力表现为极显著正相关,分别为0.451**、0.588**、0.459**、0.422**和0.490**;单株粒重与茎粗均表现为负相关;株高、行粒数、单株粒重与茎秆抗推力呈显著正相关关系,分别为0.388、0.387、0.490;穗高、秃尖、穗粗、轴粗、生育期与茎秆抗推力呈负相关关系;通过主成分分析,8 个性状进行主成分分析,前5个主成分其累计贡献率达到了89.98%。【结论】结合隶属函数、贡献率计算权重、综合评价36个玉米杂交组合抗倒伏、宜机收能力的综合评价D值,并进行聚类分析,将其划分为三类,9个综合指标强的组合,14个综合指标弱的组合,13个综合指标中等的组合。
中图分类号:
杨明花, 刘强, 廖必勇, 彭云承, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 达吾来·杰克山. 不完全双列杂交玉米组合抗倒伏综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
YANG Minghua, LIU Qiang, LIAO Biyong, PEN Yuncheng, Buayxam Namat, Dawulai Jiekeshan. Comprehensive evaluation of lodging resistance of NCII maize combinations[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 832-840.
性状 Traits | 基部3粗 3rd node Stem diameter | 基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 基3穿 3rd node RPS | 穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 基4弯 4th node BS | 穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 0.975** | |||||||
穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 0.922** | 0.924** | ||||||
基3穿3rd node RPS | 0.145 | 0.081 | 0.117 | |||||
穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 0.011 | 0.062 | 0.225 | 0.890** | ||||
基4弯4th node BS | 0.671** | 0.555** | 0.561** | 0.839** | 0.635** | |||
穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 0.540** | 0.498** | 0.653** | 0.732** | 0.703** | 0.908** | ||
单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant | 0.381* | 0.411** | 0.442** | 0.511** | 0.231 | 0.573** | 0.529** | |
茎秆抗推力 The stem resists thrust | -0.182 | -0.153 | -0.105 | 0.451** | 0.588** | 0.459** | 0.422** | 0.490** |
表1 不同玉米品种茎秆抗倒性状与产量相关性
Tab.1 Correlation analysis of lodging resistance and yield in different maize varieties
性状 Traits | 基部3粗 3rd node Stem diameter | 基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 基3穿 3rd node RPS | 穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 基4弯 4th node BS | 穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基4粗 4th node Stem diameter | 0.975** | |||||||
穗下1粗 1rd node under the ear Stem diameter | 0.922** | 0.924** | ||||||
基3穿3rd node RPS | 0.145 | 0.081 | 0.117 | |||||
穗下1穿 1rd node under the ear RPS | 0.011 | 0.062 | 0.225 | 0.890** | ||||
基4弯4th node BS | 0.671** | 0.555** | 0.561** | 0.839** | 0.635** | |||
穗下1弯 1rd node under the ear BS | 0.540** | 0.498** | 0.653** | 0.732** | 0.703** | 0.908** | ||
单株粒质量 Grain weight per plant | 0.381* | 0.411** | 0.442** | 0.511** | 0.231 | 0.573** | 0.529** | |
茎秆抗推力 The stem resists thrust | -0.182 | -0.153 | -0.105 | 0.451** | 0.588** | 0.459** | 0.422** | 0.490** |
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 穗高 Ear height | 穗长 Ear length | 秃尖长 Bar tip length | 穗粗 Ear diameter | 穗行数 Ear row number | 行粒数 Row grain number | 轴粗 Axle diameter | 百粒重 100-grain weight | 生育期 Growth period | 单株粒重 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗高Ear height | 0.561** | ||||||||||
穗长Ear length | -0.005 | -0.215 | |||||||||
秃尖长Bar tip length | -0.261 | 0.001 | -0.200 | ||||||||
穗粗Ear diameter | 0.075 | 0.080 | 0.165 | 0.071 | |||||||
穗行数Ear row number | -0.035 | 0.194 | -0.136 | 0.245 | 0.233 | ||||||
行粒数Row grain number | 0.360* | 0.043 | 0.574** | -0.332* | 0.403* | -0.031 | |||||
轴粗Axle diameter | -0.166 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.108 | 0.258 | 0.185 | 0.062 | ||||
百粒重100-grain weight | 0.250 | 0.065 | 0.476** | -0.170 | 0.546** | -0.035 | 0.685** | 0.455** | |||
生育期 Growth period | 0.022 | 0.733** | -0.250 | 0.010 | -0.389 | 0.494** | -0.506** | -0.409* | -0.811** | ||
单株粒重Grain weight per plant | 0.326* | 0.010 | 0.493** | -0.481** | 0.183 | -0.070 | 0.509** | -0.239 | 0.277 | 0.159 | |
茎秆抗推力 Thestem resists thrust | 0.388* | -0.047 | 0.237 | -0.402* | -0.075 | -0.388* | 0.387* | -0.176 | 0.195 | -0.182 | 0.490** |
表2 不同玉米品种产量性状与茎秆抗推力的相关性
Tab.2 Correlation analysis between yield traits and stem thrust resistance of different maize varieties
性状 Traits | 株高 Plant height | 穗高 Ear height | 穗长 Ear length | 秃尖长 Bar tip length | 穗粗 Ear diameter | 穗行数 Ear row number | 行粒数 Row grain number | 轴粗 Axle diameter | 百粒重 100-grain weight | 生育期 Growth period | 单株粒重 Grain weight per plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
穗高Ear height | 0.561** | ||||||||||
穗长Ear length | -0.005 | -0.215 | |||||||||
秃尖长Bar tip length | -0.261 | 0.001 | -0.200 | ||||||||
穗粗Ear diameter | 0.075 | 0.080 | 0.165 | 0.071 | |||||||
穗行数Ear row number | -0.035 | 0.194 | -0.136 | 0.245 | 0.233 | ||||||
行粒数Row grain number | 0.360* | 0.043 | 0.574** | -0.332* | 0.403* | -0.031 | |||||
轴粗Axle diameter | -0.166 | 0.000 | 0.300 | 0.108 | 0.258 | 0.185 | 0.062 | ||||
百粒重100-grain weight | 0.250 | 0.065 | 0.476** | -0.170 | 0.546** | -0.035 | 0.685** | 0.455** | |||
生育期 Growth period | 0.022 | 0.733** | -0.250 | 0.010 | -0.389 | 0.494** | -0.506** | -0.409* | -0.811** | ||
单株粒重Grain weight per plant | 0.326* | 0.010 | 0.493** | -0.481** | 0.183 | -0.070 | 0.509** | -0.239 | 0.277 | 0.159 | |
茎秆抗推力 Thestem resists thrust | 0.388* | -0.047 | 0.237 | -0.402* | -0.075 | -0.388* | 0.387* | -0.176 | 0.195 | -0.182 | 0.490** |
主成分 Principal component | 主成分1 Factor 1 | 主成分2 Factor 2 | 主成分3 Factor 3 | 主成分4 Factor 4 | 主成分5 Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.257 | 0.115 | -0.414 | 0.045 | 0.515 |
X2 | 0.126 | -0.582 | 0.074 | -0.215 | 0.446 |
X3 | 0.383 | -0.261 | 0.018 | -0.105 | 0.021 |
X4 | 0.318 | 0.175 | 0.121 | -0.628 | 0.152 |
X5 | 0.418 | 0.090 | 0.204 | 0.156 | -0.139 |
X6 | 0.443 | 0.017 | 0.149 | 0.061 | -0.135 |
X7 | 0.419 | -0.030 | 0.138 | 0.110 | -0.142 |
X8 | 0.324 | 0.191 | -0.184 | 0.266 | -0.255 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 3.95 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
百分率 Percent (%) | 49.40 | 14.24 | 10.97 | 8.47 | 6.90 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative percentage (%) | 49.40 | 63.64 | 74.61 | 83.08 | 89.98 |
表3 S7代杂交组合主成分载荷矩阵
Tab.3 Principal component load matrix of S7 generation hybrid combination
主成分 Principal component | 主成分1 Factor 1 | 主成分2 Factor 2 | 主成分3 Factor 3 | 主成分4 Factor 4 | 主成分5 Factor 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 0.257 | 0.115 | -0.414 | 0.045 | 0.515 |
X2 | 0.126 | -0.582 | 0.074 | -0.215 | 0.446 |
X3 | 0.383 | -0.261 | 0.018 | -0.105 | 0.021 |
X4 | 0.318 | 0.175 | 0.121 | -0.628 | 0.152 |
X5 | 0.418 | 0.090 | 0.204 | 0.156 | -0.139 |
X6 | 0.443 | 0.017 | 0.149 | 0.061 | -0.135 |
X7 | 0.419 | -0.030 | 0.138 | 0.110 | -0.142 |
X8 | 0.324 | 0.191 | -0.184 | 0.266 | -0.255 |
特征值 Eigenvalues | 3.95 | 1.14 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 0.55 |
百分率 Percent (%) | 49.40 | 14.24 | 10.97 | 8.47 | 6.90 |
累计贡献率 Cumulative percentage (%) | 49.40 | 63.64 | 74.61 | 83.08 | 89.98 |
No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | u(x1) | u(x2) | u(x3) | u(x4) | u(x5) | D值 | 综合评 价指数 Compreh- ensive evaluation index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1×S7-1 | -1.666 | 1.951 | 1.050 | -0.137 | 0.100 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 中 |
1×S7-2 | -2.456 | 0.564 | 0.770 | 1.551 | 0.625 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.52 | 弱 |
1×S7-3 | -2.519 | -1.023 | 1.596 | -0.308 | 0.270 | 0.94 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 中 |
1×S7-4 | -1.312 | 0.574 | 0.359 | 0.155 | 0.692 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 中 |
1×S7-5 | -1.894 | 0.429 | -0.602 | 0.586 | -0.138 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 弱 |
1×S7-6 | -4.055 | 0.360 | -1.888 | 0.149 | 0.178 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 弱 |
1×S7-7 | -1.325 | 0.321 | 0.496 | -0.008 | -0.432 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 中 |
1×S7-8 | -2.526 | 0.326 | 0.443 | 0.544 | 0.304 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 弱 |
1×S7-9 | -2.099 | 0.986 | 0.175 | -0.089 | 0.390 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 弱 |
2×S7-1 | -0.568 | 0.519 | -1.306 | 0.368 | 0.585 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 弱 |
2×S7-2 | 2.430 | 1.349 | 0.570 | -0.465 | 0.086 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 强 |
2×S7-3 | 2.192 | -1.790 | -1.428 | -1.040 | -0.111 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 中 |
2×S7-4 | 2.653 | -0.906 | -0.695 | 1.149 | -0.755 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 中 |
2×S7-5 | 1.437 | 2.514 | -1.282 | 0.711 | -0.701 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 中 |
2×S7-6 | -0.052 | -0.690 | -1.216 | 1.174 | -0.927 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 弱 |
2×S7-7 | 3.393 | 0.760 | 0.391 | -0.921 | -0.471 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 强 |
2×S7-8 | -0.769 | -0.377 | -0.672 | -0.423 | -0.255 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 弱 |
2×S7-9 | 2.765 | 0.943 | -0.223 | 1.078 | -0.154 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 强 |
3×S7-1 | -1.658 | -0.645 | 0.273 | -0.705 | -1.811 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 弱 |
3×S7-2 | 0.878 | 1.025 | 1.281 | 0.269 | -1.438 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 强 |
3×S7-3 | -0.042 | -1.150 | 0.926 | 0.773 | 0.285 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 中 |
3×S7-4 | 2.740 | -0.685 | 0.291 | 1.145 | -0.204 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-5 | 1.126 | 1.037 | 1.006 | -1.183 | -0.062 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 强 |
3×S7-6 | 1.580 | -2.195 | 0.888 | -0.969 | -0.389 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-7 | 1.382 | -0.507 | 0.317 | 0.561 | 0.317 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 强 |
3×S7-8 | 0.539 | -1.238 | 0.224 | 1.901 | 0.512 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 中 |
3×S7-9 | 3.318 | 0.556 | 1.235 | -0.202 | 1.396 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 强 |
4×S7-1 | 0.067 | -0.053 | -0.844 | -0.988 | 1.878 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 弱 |
4×S7-2 | 1.129 | 0.648 | -2.456 | -1.059 | 0.477 | 0.22 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 弱 |
4×S7-3 | -0.834 | 0.199 | -0.490 | -0.867 | -1.274 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 弱 |
4×S7-4 | 0.286 | -0.257 | 0.159 | -0.305 | -0.265 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-5 | 1.465 | -0.790 | 0.002 | -0.049 | 0.472 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-6 | -2.003 | -0.253 | 0.257 | -0.694 | 0.515 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 弱 |
4×S7-7 | 1.132 | -0.705 | -0.060 | -0.514 | 1.039 | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 中 |
4×S7-8 | -2.735 | -2.273 | -0.164 | -0.097 | -0.178 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 弱 |
4×S7-9 | -1.997 | 0.477 | 0.619 | -1.089 | -0.556 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 中 |
权重Weight | - | - | - | - | - | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - |
表4 杂交组合主成分分析得分、隶属函数值
Tab.4 Principal componentanalysis scores and membership function values of hybrid combinations
No. | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | u(x1) | u(x2) | u(x3) | u(x4) | u(x5) | D值 | 综合评 价指数 Compreh- ensive evaluation index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1×S7-1 | -1.666 | 1.951 | 1.050 | -0.137 | 0.100 | 0.63 | 0.90 | 0.61 | 0.43 | 0.08 | 0.61 | 中 |
1×S7-2 | -2.456 | 0.564 | 0.770 | 1.551 | 0.625 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.12 | 0.00 | 0.17 | 0.52 | 弱 |
1×S7-3 | -2.519 | -1.023 | 1.596 | -0.308 | 0.270 | 0.94 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.60 | 中 |
1×S7-4 | -1.312 | 0.574 | 0.359 | 0.155 | 0.692 | 0.69 | 0.62 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.24 | 0.57 | 中 |
1×S7-5 | -1.894 | 0.429 | -0.602 | 0.586 | -0.138 | 0.46 | 0.50 | 0.44 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.41 | 弱 |
1×S7-6 | -4.055 | 0.360 | -1.888 | 0.149 | 0.178 | 0.00 | 0.40 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.04 | 0.40 | 弱 |
1×S7-7 | -1.325 | 0.321 | 0.496 | -0.008 | -0.432 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.59 | 中 |
1×S7-8 | -2.526 | 0.326 | 0.443 | 0.544 | 0.304 | 0.63 | 0.58 | 0.20 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.49 | 弱 |
1×S7-9 | -2.099 | 0.986 | 0.175 | -0.089 | 0.390 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 弱 |
2×S7-1 | -0.568 | 0.519 | -1.306 | 0.368 | 0.585 | 0.45 | 0.59 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 0.57 | 0.45 | 弱 |
2×S7-2 | 2.430 | 1.349 | 0.570 | -0.465 | 0.086 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.87 | 强 |
2×S7-3 | 2.192 | -1.790 | -1.428 | -1.040 | -0.111 | 0.60 | 0.06 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.90 | 0.56 | 中 |
2×S7-4 | 2.653 | -0.906 | -0.695 | 1.149 | -0.755 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.95 | 0.25 | 0.82 | 0.67 | 中 |
2×S7-5 | 1.437 | 2.514 | -1.282 | 0.711 | -0.701 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.38 | 0.69 | 0.59 | 中 |
2×S7-6 | -0.052 | -0.690 | -1.216 | 1.174 | -0.927 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.58 | 0.13 | 0.72 | 0.42 | 弱 |
2×S7-7 | 3.393 | 0.760 | 0.391 | -0.921 | -0.471 | 0.98 | 0.68 | 1.00 | 0.83 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 强 |
2×S7-8 | -0.769 | -0.377 | -0.672 | -0.423 | -0.255 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.47 | 弱 |
2×S7-9 | 2.765 | 0.943 | -0.223 | 1.078 | -0.154 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.81 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 0.78 | 强 |
3×S7-1 | -1.658 | -0.645 | 0.273 | -0.705 | -1.811 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 弱 |
3×S7-2 | 0.878 | 1.025 | 1.281 | 0.269 | -1.438 | 0.91 | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.83 | 强 |
3×S7-3 | -0.042 | -1.150 | 0.926 | 0.773 | 0.285 | 0.87 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.39 | 0.65 | 中 |
3×S7-4 | 2.740 | -0.685 | 0.291 | 1.145 | -0.204 | 0.87 | 0.53 | 0.88 | 0.40 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-5 | 1.126 | 1.037 | 1.006 | -1.183 | -0.062 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.90 | 0.52 | 0.77 | 强 |
3×S7-6 | 1.580 | -2.195 | 0.888 | -0.969 | -0.389 | 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 强 |
3×S7-7 | 1.382 | -0.507 | 0.317 | 0.561 | 0.317 | 0.86 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 0.45 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 强 |
3×S7-8 | 0.539 | -1.238 | 0.224 | 1.901 | 0.512 | 0.71 | 0.55 | 0.33 | 0.20 | 0.52 | 0.58 | 中 |
3×S7-9 | 3.318 | 0.556 | 1.235 | -0.202 | 1.396 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.46 | 0.88 | 强 |
4×S7-1 | 0.067 | -0.053 | -0.844 | -0.988 | 1.878 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.21 | 0.82 | 0.40 | 0.49 | 弱 |
4×S7-2 | 1.129 | 0.648 | -2.456 | -1.059 | 0.477 | 0.22 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.82 | 0.74 | 0.41 | 弱 |
4×S7-3 | -0.834 | 0.199 | -0.490 | -0.867 | -1.274 | 0.44 | 0.40 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.50 | 0.48 | 弱 |
4×S7-4 | 0.286 | -0.257 | 0.159 | -0.305 | -0.265 | 0.82 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.42 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-5 | 1.465 | -0.790 | 0.002 | -0.049 | 0.472 | 0.80 | 0.39 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 中 |
4×S7-6 | -2.003 | -0.253 | 0.257 | -0.694 | 0.515 | 0.56 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 0.14 | 0.46 | 弱 |
4×S7-7 | 1.132 | -0.705 | -0.060 | -0.514 | 1.039 | 0.77 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.65 | 中 |
4×S7-8 | -2.735 | -2.273 | -0.164 | -0.097 | -0.178 | 0.63 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.13 | 0.49 | 0.40 | 弱 |
4×S7-9 | -1.997 | 0.477 | 0.619 | -1.089 | -0.556 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.42 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.61 | 中 |
权重Weight | - | - | - | - | - | 0.55 | 0.16 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.08 | - |
[1] | 赵久然, 王荣焕, 史洁慧, 等. 国内外玉米动态及展望[J]. 作物杂志, 2008,(5):5-9. |
ZHAO Jiuran, WANG Ronghuan, SHI Jiehui, et al. Corn trends and prospects at home and abroad[J]. Crops, 2008,(5):5-9. | |
[2] |
薛军, 王克如, 谢瑞芝, 等. 玉米生长后期倒伏研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(10): 1845-1854.
DOI |
XUE Jun, WANG Keru, XIE Ruizhi, et al. Research progress on lodging in late growth stage of maize[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(10): 1845-1854.
DOI |
|
[3] |
王夏青, 宋伟, 张如养, 等. 玉米茎秆抗倒伏遗传的研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学 2021, 54(11):2261-2272.
DOI |
WANG Xiaqing, SONG Wei, ZHANG Ruyang, et al. Research progress on lodging resistance inheritance of maize stalk[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(11): 2261-2272. | |
[4] | 胡建东, 鲍雅萍, 罗福和, 等. 作物茎秆抗倒伏强度测定技术研究[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2000, 34(1):77-80. |
HU Jiandong, BAO Yaping, LUO Fuhe, et al. Study on determination technology of lodging resistance of crop stems[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2000, 34(1): 77-80. | |
[5] | 王恒亮, 吴仁海, 朱昆, 等. 玉米倒伏成因与控制措施研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(10): 1-5. |
WANG Hengliang, WU Renhai, ZHU Kun, et al. Research progress on Causes and control measures of maize lodging[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 40(10): 1-5. | |
[6] | 汪黎明, 姚国旗, 穆春华, 等. 玉米抗倒性的遗传研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2011, 19(4): 1-4. |
WANG Liming, YAO Quoqi, MU Chunhua, et al. Genetic research progress of lodging resistance in maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2011, 19(4): 1-4. | |
[7] | 靳英杰, 李鸿萍, 安盼盼, 等. 玉米抗倒性研究进展[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(2): 94-98. |
JIN Yingjie, LI Hongping, AN Panpan, et al. Research progress on Lodging Resistance of maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(2): 94-98. | |
[8] | 勾玲, 赵明, 黄建军, 等. 玉米茎秆弯曲性能与抗倒能力的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(4): 653-661. |
GOU Ling, ZHAO Ming, HUANG Jianjun, et al. Study on bending property and lodging resistance of maize stalk[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34 (4): 653-661.
DOI URL |
|
[9] | Hu H X, Liu W X, Fu Z Y, et al. QTL mapping of stalk bending strength in a recombinant inbred line maize population[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2013, 126(9):2257-2266. |
[10] |
Li K, Yan J, Li J, et al. Genetic architecture of rind penetrometer resistance in two maize recombinant inbred line populations[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2014, 14(1): 152.
DOI URL |
[11] | 许莹莹, 马青美, 宋希云, 等. 不同玉米品种倒伏抗性与产量相关性状的聚类和相关分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2019, 27(5):15-21. |
XU Yingying, MA Qingmei, SONG Xiyun, et al. Clustering and correlation analysis of lodging Resistance and yield related traits of different maize varieties[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2019, 27(5): 15-21. | |
[12] | 王峥, 张宾, 李华伟. 2013 年倒伏对夏玉米产量影响试验报告[J]. 河南农业, 2016,(2):19-21. |
WANG Zheng, ZHANG Bin, LI Huawei. Experimental report on the impact of lodging on summer maize yield in 2013[J]. Agriculture of Henan, 2016,(2): 19-21. | |
[13] |
李树岩, 马玮, 彭记永, 等. 大喇叭口及灌浆期倒伏对夏玉米产量损失的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(19): 3952-3964.
DOI |
LI Shuyan, MA Wei, PENG Jiyong, et al. Study on yield loss of summer maize caused by large bell mouth and lodging during grain filling period[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(19): 3952-3964.
DOI |
|
[14] | 曹庆军, 曹铁华, 杨粉团, 等. 灌浆期风灾倒伏对玉米子粒灌浆特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(9):1107-1113. |
CAO Qingjun, CAO Tiehua, YANG Fengtuan, et al. Effects of wind disaster lodging on Grain Filling Characteristics and quality of maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2013, 21(9): 1107-1113. | |
[15] | 勾玲, 黄建军, 张宾, 等. 群体密度对玉米茎秆抗倒力学和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2007,(33):1688-1695. |
GOU Ling, HUANG Jianjun, ZHANG Bin, et al. Effects of population density on lodging resistance and agronomic characters of maize stems[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007,(33):1688-1695. | |
[16] | 李永忠. 玉米茎秆和根系的研究概况[J]. 国外农学:玉米, 1990, 1(2) :5-9. |
LI Yongzhong. Research overview of maize stem and root system[J]. Foreign Agronomy: Maize, 1990, 1(2): 5-9. | |
[17] | 孙世贤, 戴俊英, 顾慰连. 氮、磷、钾肥对玉米倒伏及其产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 1989, 22(3) :28-33. |
SUN Shixian, DAI Junying, GU Weiliang. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers on Maize lodging and yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1989, 22(3): 28-33. | |
[18] | 张芳魁, 霍仕平, 张健, 等. 玉米茎秆性状与抗折断力的相关和通径分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2006, 14(6) : 46-49. |
ZHANG Fankui, HUO Shiping, ZHANG Jian, et al. Correlation and path analysis between maize stem traits and breaking resistance[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2006, 14(6): 46-49. | |
[19] | Martin S A, Darrah L L, Hibbard B E. Divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance and its effects on Europe-an corn borer damage and stalk traits in corn[J]. Crop Science, 2004. |
[20] | 王雅楠, 鉴军帅, 贾凯. 等. 不同玉米品种青贮收获期茎秆抗倒力学特性比较分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(5):77-85, 92. |
WANG Yanan, JIAN Junshuai, JIA Kai, et al. Comparative analysis of stem lodging resistance of Different Maize Varieties during silage harvest[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020, 28(5): 77-85, 92. | |
[21] | 刘卫星, 王晨阳, 王强, 等. 不同玉米品种茎秆抗倒特性及其与产量的关系[J]. 河南农业科学, 2015, 44(7):17-21. |
LIU Weixin, WANG Chenyang, WANG Qiang, et al. Stem lodging resistance of different maize varieties and its relationship with yield[J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 44(7): 17-21. | |
[22] | 郝玉波, 于洋, 钱春荣, 等. 不同熟期玉米品种茎秆抗倒伏特性研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2020,(12):14-18. |
HAO Yubo, YU Yang, QIAN Chunrong, et al. Study on stem lodging resistance of maize varieties at different maturity[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020,(12): 14-18. | |
[23] | 杨青华, 冉午玲, 李蕾蕾, 等. 玉米茎秆性状与倒伏的相关性及通经分析[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2016, 50(2):167-170. |
YANG Qinghua, RAN Wuling, LI Leilei, et al. Correlation and general analysis of maize stem traits and lodging[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2016, 50(2): 167-170. | |
[24] | 赵仁全, 张启东, 蹇淑红, 等. 玉米抗倒能力的差异及倒伏对穗部性状的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2004,(3) : 20. |
ZHAO Renquan, ZHANG Qidong, JIAN Shuhong, et al. Differences in lodging resistance of maize and effects of lodging on ear traits[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2004,(3): 20. | |
[25] | 李雁, 肖植文, 伏成秀, 等. 云南28个玉米杂交组合主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 西南农业学报, 2015, 28(1): 34-40. |
LI Yan, XIAO Zhiwen, FU Chenxiu, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation of 28 maize hybrid combinations in Yunnan[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 28(1): 34-40. | |
[26] | 丁璐, 刘海学, 王聿双, 等. 26个玉米杂交组合农艺性状的相关性与主成分分[J/OL]. 分子植物育种:1-8[2019-12-11]. |
DING Lu, LIU Haixue, WANG Yushuang, et al. Correlation and principal component analysis of agronomic characters of 26 maize hybrids[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding: 1-8 [December 11, 2019]. | |
[27] | 李帅, 刘长华, 曹士亮, 等. 30个玉米杂交组合主要农艺性状鉴定与综合评价研究[J]. 黑龙江大学(自然科学学报), 2019, 36(6):703-712. |
LI Shuai, LIU Changhua, CAO Shiliang, et al. Identification and comprehensive evaluation of main agronomic characters of 30 maize hybrid combinations[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Heilongjiang University, 2019, 36(6): 703-712. | |
[28] | 王平, 徐加利, 闫保罗, 等. 基于主成分-聚类-逐步回归分析的夏玉米品种光温利用能力综合评价[J]. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):71-77. |
WANG Ping, XU Giali, YAN Baoluo, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of light and temperature utilization capacity of summer maize varieties based on principal component cluster stepwise regression analysis[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 52(10): 71-77. |
[1] | 张永强, 陈传信, 聂石辉, 徐其江, 赛力汗·赛, 雷钧杰. 矮壮素滴施时期对冬小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力的调控分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878. |
[2] | 赵连佳, 李淦, 徐麟, 颜国荣, 刘宁, 王帆, 邓超宏, 阿布都克尤木·阿不都热孜克, 王聪, 王威. 不同大豆品种在新疆生态区主要农艺性状表现及产量的相关分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670. |
[3] | 张景灿, 张永强, 雷钧杰, 陈传信, 徐其江, 聂石辉, 徐文修. 不同调节剂对滴灌冬小麦茎秆特征及其抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1067-1074. |
[4] | 姚庆, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 杨明花, 李强, 苗昊翠, 崔宏亮. 藜麦种子对萌发温度的响应及低温胁迫萌发能力鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149. |
[5] | 刘敏, 靳娟, 阿布都卡尤木·阿依麦提, 樊丁宇, 郝庆, 杨磊, 赵晓梅, 耿文娟. 新疆3个鲜食枣品种的抗寒性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 916-924. |
[6] | 郭阳, 郭俊先, 史勇, 刘丽, 方文艳, 刘彦岑. 特征波长筛选结合PCA-LSSVM对甜瓜叶片SPAD值的预测[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(3): 616-623. |
[7] | 马旭, 赵英, 韩炜, 武胜利, 韩晓燕. 14种沙棘果实中氨基酸组成的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 378-388. |
[8] | 曹艺洁, 史智勇, 玉苏甫·阿不力提甫, 艾沙江·买买提. 库尔勒香梨粗皮果矿质元素和氨基酸的含量分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 407-415. |
[9] | 马辉, 戴路, 李星星, 阿布都艾尼·阿布都维力, 艾麦尔江·阿布力提甫, 田立文, 欧欢. 不同化学药剂处理对长绒棉封顶效果的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2601-2608. |
[10] | 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 张燕红, 袁杰, 赵志强, 文孝荣, 杜孝敬, 王奉斌, 吕玉平, 阿曼古丽·艾孜子. 新疆优质丰产香型水稻品种筛选与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2694-2703. |
[11] | 柳萍, 张凯, 马超, 张慧, 杨川. 有机物料对不同磷肥用量条件下棉田综合效益评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2521-2531. |
[12] | 窦子微, 杨璐, 程平, 张志刚, 李宏. 不同品种桑葚营养品质分析及综合评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 127-139. |
[13] | 杨明花, 王倩, 周新丽, 艾合买提江·马合木提, 彭云承, 艾尔居玛·吐卢汗, 布阿依夏木·那曼提, 侯丽丽, 刘强. 玉米杂交组合性状及产量的多重分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122. |
[14] | 李春雨, 谭占明, 程云霞, 束胜, 何涛, 靳钰婕, 马新超, 杜佳庚, 张婧. 水肥耦合对沙培番茄生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2158-2169. |
[15] | 由佳辉, 高林, 冯琳骄, 买迪妮阿依·买买提, 周龙, 李树德. 17个葡萄砧木品种叶片解剖结构与抗旱性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1896-1906. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||