大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定与评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.01.008

新疆农业科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (1): 65-71.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.01.008

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定与评价

严勇亮¹, 张金波¹, 路子峰¹, 赵晓玲², 刘海军², 赵康², 丛花¹

1.新疆农业科学院农作物品种资源研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091;
2.新疆农业大学科学技术学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2020-04-09 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-20
通信作者: 丛花(1962-),女,新疆博乐人,研究员,博士,研究方向为小麦遗传育种,( E-mail)huacong0924@163.com
作者简介:严勇亮(1982-),男,新疆喀什人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为农作物种质资源创新利用,(E-mail)yanliang198279@163.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区青年基金(2016D01B038)

Salt Tolerance Evaluation of Soybean Germplasm

YAN Yongliang¹, ZHANG Jinbo¹, LU Zifeng¹, ZHAO Xiaoling², LIU Haijun², ZHAO Kang², CONG Hua¹

1. Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources , Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China;
2. College of Science and Technology, Xinjiang Agricultural University , Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2020-04-09 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-20
Correspondence author: CONG Hua (1962-), female, Xinjiang Bole, Researcher, Mainly engaged in wheat genetic and breeding, (E-mail)huacong0924@126.com
Supported by:
Youth Fund Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (2016D01B038)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 研究120份大豆种质资源芽期和苗期耐盐特性,筛选大豆耐盐资源,为新疆大豆耐盐新品种选育提供参考。【方法】 120份供试材料按照农业部《大豆耐盐性鉴定评价技术规范》 NY/PZ001-2002的标准,在萌发期设置2个不同NaCl(1.2%和1.5%)溶液处理,测定萌发期发芽率;大豆苗期用1.5% NaCl溶液对5 d的幼苗进行处理15 d后,测定株高、根长、植株鲜重、根鲜重、植株干重和根干重。【结果】 在1.2% NaCl浓度处理下,筛选出高耐盐品种2份,分别是中黄30号和FtC099,占参试材料的1.67%,相对盐害率为20.1%～40.0%的2级耐盐材料有10份,占8.33%;芽期在1.5%NaCl浓度处理下,筛选出2级耐盐材料为来自日本的FtC099,占参试验材料的0.83%。苗期中筛选出高耐盐材料有1份(日本引进品种S11-5),占0.83%。苗期2级耐盐材料有12份,占10%。【结论】 大豆种质资源芽期和苗期耐盐性表现不同,在盐胁迫条件下,盐敏感品种比耐盐品种受盐胁迫影响更大。

关键词: 大豆; 种质资源; 芽期; 苗期; 耐盐性

Abstract: 【Objective】 The salt tolerance characteristics of 120 soybean germplasm resources in germination and seedling stage were studied in order to screen the salt tolerance resources of soybean and provide reference for the breeding of new soybean varieties with strong salt tolerance in Xinjiang.【Method】 The technical criterion for appraisal and assessment of salt tolerance of soybean cultivars(NY/PZT001 - 2002) of Ministry of Agriculture was referred in this study and 1.2% and 1.5% NaCl solution were treated at the germination stage to test the germination rate. Plant height, root length, fresh weight of plants, fresh weight of roots, dry weight of plants and dry weight of roots were measured in the seedling stage using 1.5% NaCl solution.【Result】 At germination stage, under the 1.2% NaCl concentration treatment, two high salt resistance (grade 1) varieties were screened out, accounting for 1.67% , which were Zhonghuang 30 and FtC099, and ten salt resistance (grade 2) varieties were screened out, accounting for 8.33% . Under the 1.5% NaCl concentration treatment, one salt resistant material (grade 2) was screened, accounting for 0.83%, and the variety was FtC099 from Japan. At seedling stage, one high salt resistance material was selected, accounting for 0.83%, which was the imported variety S11-5 from Japan. There were 12 salt-resistant materials of grade 2 in seedling stage, accounting for 10%.【Conclusion】 The salt tolerance mechanism at soybean germination stage and seedling stage were different. Under salt stress, salt-sensitive varieties were more affected by salt stress than salt-tolerant varieties.

Key words: soybean; germplasm; germination stage; seedling stage; salt tolerance

中图分类号:

S321
S565.1

严勇亮, 张金波, 路子峰, 赵晓玲, 刘海军, 赵康, 丛花. 大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(1): 65-71.

YAN Yongliang, ZHANG Jinbo, LU Zifeng, ZHAO Xiaoling, LIU Haijun, ZHAO Kang, CONG Hua. Salt Tolerance Evaluation of Soybean Germplasm[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(1): 65-71.

参考文献

[1]Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59(1):651-681.
[2]Mark T, Romola D. Na+ Tolerance and Na+ Transport in Higher Plants [J]. Annals of Botany, 2003,(5):5.
[3]Foyer C. H. Oxygen processing in photosynthesis [J]. Biochemical Society Transactions, 1996, 24(2):427-433.
[4]张彦威,张礼凤,李伟,等. 大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性的隶属函数分析[J]. 山东农业科学,2016,48(1):21-25.
ZHANG Yan wei, ZHANG Lifeng, LI Wei, et al. Evaluation on Salt Tolerance of Soybean at Germination and Seedling Stages Using Membership Function[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 48(1):21-25.
[5]郭蓓,邱丽娟,邵桂花,等. 大豆耐盐性种质的分子标记辅助鉴定及其利用研究[J]. 大豆科学, 2002, 21(1):56-61.
GUO Bei, QIU Lijuan, SHAO Guihua, et al. Markers-Assisted Identification of the Salt Tolerant Accessions in Soybean [J]. Soybean Science, 2002, 21(1):56-61.
[6]Abel G. H. Inheritance of the capacity for chloride inclusion and chloride exclusion by soybean [J]. Crop Science, 1969, 9(6): 697-698.
[7]Tuyen D. D, Lal S. K, Xu D. H. Identification of a major QTL allele from wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc.) for increasing alkaline salt tolerance in soybean[J]. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 2010, 121(2):229-236.
[8]邵桂花,常汝镇,陈一舞,等. 大豆耐盐性遗传的研究[J].作物学报,1994,20(6):721-726.
SHAO Guihua, CHANG Ruzhen, CHEN Yiwu, et al. Study on Inheritance of Salt Tolerance in Soybean [J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1994, 20(6):721-726.
[9]陈德明. 盐渍环境中的植物耐盐性及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学研究进展,1994,22(5):22-29.
CHEN Deming. Salinity tolerance of plants in saline environment and its influencing factors [J]. Progress in Soil Science, 1994, 22(5):22-29.
[10]李娜娜,蒲艳艳,宫永超,等. 大豆农家品种资源芽期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐品种筛选[J]. 中国农学通报,2018,34(9):15-23.
LI Nana, PU Yanyan, GONG Yongchao, et al. Identification and Selection of Salt Tolerant Varieties in Germination Stage of Native Soybean Varieties [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(9):15-23.
[11]NY/PZT001-2002.大豆耐盐鉴定评价技术规范[S].
NY/PZT001-2002.The test of salt tolerance index at soybean seedling stage[S].
[12]罗庆云,於丙军,刘友良. 大豆苗期耐盐性鉴定指标的检验[J]. 大豆科学,2001,20(3):177-182.
LUO Qingyun, YU Bingjun, LIU Youliang. The test of salt tolerance index at soybean seedling stage [J]. Soybean Science, 2001, 20(3):177-182.
[13]张国伟,路海玲,张雷,等. 棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价及耐盐指标筛选[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(8):2045-2053.
ZHANG Guowei, LU Hailing, ZHANG Lei, et al. Salt tolerance evaluation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) at its germinating and seedling stages and selection of related indices [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(8):2045-2053.
[14]孔令功. 大豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定与耐盐材料筛选[J]. 大豆科技,2019,9(5):1-9.
KONG Linggong. Identification of Salt Tolerance in Seedling Stage of Soybean Germplasm Resources Screening of Salt Tolerant Materials [J]. Soybean Science ＆ Technology, 2019,9(5):1-9.
[15]刘光宇. 耐盐大豆文丰7号苗期耐盐性的生理特性分析及耐盐基因精细定位[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2011.
LIU Guangyu. Analysis of Soybean Physiological Responses to Salinity Stress and Mapping of Salt Tolerance Gene at Seedling Stage [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2011.
[16]盖如玉. 大豆种质资源的耐盐性鉴定和多样性分析[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2007.
GAI Ruyu. Salt-tolerance Evaluation and Genetic Diversity Analysis on Soybean Germplasm Resources [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2007.
[17]杨燕. 大豆幼苗期耐盐QTL的定位及候选基因的克隆[D]. 南京:南京农业大学,2013.
YANG Yan. Mapping QTL Conferring Salt Tolerance at Seedling Stage and Cloning of Candidate Genes in Soybean [D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013.
[18]牛远,杨修艳,戴存凤,等. 大豆芽期和苗期耐盐性评价指标筛选[J]. 大豆科学,2018,3(2):215-223.
NIU Yuan, YANG Xiuyan, DAI Cunfeng, et al. Related Indices Selection of Soybean Salt Tolerance at Germination and Seedling Stages [J]. Soybean Science, 2018, 3(2):215-223.

大豆种质资源耐盐性鉴定与评价

Salt Tolerance Evaluation of Soybean Germplasm

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	黄幸磊, 王为然, 王萌, 朱家辉, 林峰, 秦国礼, 杨静, 阿里甫·艾尔西, 吴全忠, 孔杰. 海岛棉种质资源机采农艺性状相关性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 1-8.
[2]	汪天玲, 侯献飞, 施俊杰, 孙全喜, 贾东海, 顾元国, 单世华, 苗昊翠, 李强. 67份匍匐型花生种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(1): 42-54.
[3]	宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.
[4]	冯国郡, 胡相伟, 赵云, 于明, 张述功, 周道良. 新疆谷子种质资源评价及产业研究进展[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1887-1893.
[5]	时晓磊, 丁孙磊, 丛花, 张金波, 曲可佳, 王兴州, 韩岱, 严勇亮. 夏播大豆产量相关性状灰色关联度分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1641-1652.
[6]	严勇亮, 张恒, 曲可佳, 时晓磊, 王兴州, 张金波, 丛花. 大豆不同品种农艺性状及产量的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1653-1662.
[7]	赵连佳, 李淦, 徐麟, 颜国荣, 刘宁, 王帆, 邓超宏, 阿布都克尤木·阿不都热孜克, 王聪, 王威. 不同大豆品种在新疆生态区主要农艺性状表现及产量的相关分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670.
[8]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[9]	陈艳, 黄璐瑶, 邓昌蓉, 张彦君, 侯全刚, 邵登魁. 冷害对多茸毛型线辣椒幼苗生理水平的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1492-1498.
[10]	张燕红, 侯天钰, 巴音花, 赵彩月, 吕玉平, 布哈丽且木·阿不力孜, 赵志强, 李冬, 杜孝敬, 袁杰, 王奉斌. 水稻重组自交系群体芽期和苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1041-1049.
[11]	黄倩楠, 马尔合巴·艾司拜尔, 邹辉, 王彩荣, 艾力买买提·库尔班, 孙娜, 雷钧杰. 新疆冬小麦种质资源主要农艺性状遗传多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1050-1058.
[12]	桑志伟, 梁亚军, 龚照龙, 郑巨云, 王俊铎, 李雪源, 陈全家. 不同陆地棉种质资源机采性状分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[13]	逯涛, 曾庆涛, 张文, 王文博, 王政洋, 杨芮, 孙玉岩. 主成分分析及灰色关联度分析综合评价棉花产量与品质[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.
[14]	哈力旦·依克热木, 刘娜, 刘联正, 周安定, 姜奇彦, 达买力江·合孜尔, 曹俊梅, 张新忠. 小麦近缘种芽期和苗期的耐盐性鉴定与评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1118-1126.
[15]	朱宝国, 匡恩俊, 滕占林, 孟庆英, 王囡囡, 冯浩原, 邱磊, 高雪冬, 张春峰. 不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株生长、抗病及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1127-1133.