不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株生长、抗病及产量的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.011

新疆农业科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 1127-1133.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.011

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇下一篇

不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株生长、抗病及产量的影响

朱宝国¹(), 匡恩俊², 滕占林³, 孟庆英¹, 王囡囡¹, 冯浩原¹, 邱磊¹, 高雪冬¹, 张春峰¹()

1.黑龙江省农业科学院佳木斯分院,黑龙江佳木斯 154007
2.黑龙江省农业科学院土壤肥料与环境资源研究所,哈尔滨 150086
3.佳木斯市绿色食品发展中心,黑龙江佳木斯 154002

收稿日期:2022-09-29 出版日期:2023-05-20 发布日期:2023-05-22
通信作者: 张春峰(1965-),男,黑龙江汤原人,研究员,博士,研究方向为土壤肥料与作物营养,(E-mail)chunfeng-1@163.com
作者简介:朱宝国(1982-),男,黑龙江依兰人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为土壤肥料与作物营养,(E-mail)zhubaoguo82@163.com
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项'黑土地保护与利用科技创新工程专项(XDA28010403);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项'黑土地保护与利用科技创新工程专项(XDA28100202)

Effects of different bio-organic fertilizers application combined with conventional fertilization on growth, disease resistance and yield of soybean

ZHU Baoguo¹(), KUANG Enjun², TENG Zhanglin³, MENG Qingying¹, WANG Nannan¹, FENG Haoyuan¹, QIU Lei¹, GAO Xuedong¹, ZHANG Chunfeng¹()

1. Jiamusi Branch, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jiamusi Heilongjiang 154007, China
2. Institute of Soil Fertilizer and Environment Resources, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China
3. Jiamusi Green Food Development Center, Jiamusi Heilongjiang 150002,China

Received:2022-09-29 Online:2023-05-20 Published:2023-05-22
Correspondence author: ZHANG Chunfeng (1965-), male,Tangyuan Heilongjiang Province, Researcher, research field: Soil fertilizer and crop nutrition, (E-mail)Chunfeng-1@163.com
Supported by:
Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA28010403);Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA28100202)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株性状、抗病性及产量和效益的影响。【方法】在大田条件下采用小区试验方法,设置常规施肥和不同生物有机肥配施化肥处理,研究大豆干物质、根瘤、抗病性及其产量变化。【结果】与常规施肥相比,不同生物有机肥配施化肥提高了苗期和盛花期大豆的地上部干物质、根干重和根瘤数,干物质提高幅度为5.31%~12.86%,根干重提高幅度为10.35%~20.24%,根瘤数提高幅度为12.34%~37.50%,差异均达到显著水平(P<0.05);不同生物有机肥配施化肥显著降低了苗期根腐病发病率和病情指数;显著提高大豆的株高、株荚数、株粒数及提高百粒重,提高大豆产量,2019~2020年产量提高幅度分别为7.25%~8.67%和6.50%~8.82%,与对照相比差异均达显著水平(P<0.05);与对照相比,不同生物有机肥配施化肥处理均提高了大豆的产值和效益值,效益值最高增加1 066.16元/hm²。【结论】生物有机肥配施化肥能够促进大豆植株生长,降低病害,提高产量,提高经济效益。

关键词: 大豆; 生物有机肥; 植株性状; 根腐病; 产量; 效益

Abstract:

【Objective】 To clarify the effects of different bio-organic fertilizers application combined with conventional fertilization on traits, yield and economic benefit of soybean plant.【Methods】 Dry matter, root nodule, disease resistance and yield were studied by plots field experiment in which different bio-organic fertilizers combined with conventional fertilization were determined.【Results】 Compared with conventional fertilization, aboveground dry matter, root dry weight and nodule number of soybean increased in different bio-organic fertilizer application treatments at seedling and full flowering stages by 5.31%-12.86%, 10.35%-20.24% and 12.34%-37.50%, respectively (P<0.05).Incidence rate and disease index of root rot were reduced significantly at the seedling stage in bio-organic fertilizer application treatment.Meanwhile, plant height, pod number per plant, grain number per plant and 100-grain weight of soybean were remarkably increased, which led to an improvement of soybean yield.The yields in 2019 and 2020 were lifted by 7.25%-8.67% and 6.50%-8.82%, respectively (P<0.05).Output and benefit of soybean were raised by applying bio-organic fertilizers combined with conventional fertilization compared with the control and the highest benefit addition value was 1,066.16 yuan/hm².【Conclusion】 By applying bio-organic fertilizers combined with conventional fertilization, the growth of soybean is promoted, diseases are reduced, yield is promoted and economic benefit is increased.

Key words: soybean; bio-organic fertilizer; plant traits; root rot; yield; benefit

中图分类号:

S144

朱宝国, 匡恩俊, 滕占林, 孟庆英, 王囡囡, 冯浩原, 邱磊, 高雪冬, 张春峰. 不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株生长、抗病及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1127-1133.

ZHU Baoguo, KUANG Enjun, TENG Zhanglin, MENG Qingying, WANG Nannan, FENG Haoyuan, QIU Lei, GAO Xuedong, ZHANG Chunfeng. Effects of different bio-organic fertilizers application combined with conventional fertilization on growth, disease resistance and yield of soybean[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1127-1133.

图/表 6

参考文献 22

[1]	沈永哲. 东北黑土地保护利用问题与对策[J]. 农业科技与装备, 2021,(1):71-72.
	SHEN Yongzhe. Problems on protection and utilization of black land in northeast China and its countermeasure[J]. Agricultural Science&Technology and Equipment, 2021,(1):71-72.
[2]	姜宁, 王斌, 谢永刚. 黑龙江省黑土地质量评价指标体系构建[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(33):98-104. DOI
	JIANG Ning, WANG Bi, XIE Yonggang. Construction of black soil quality evaluation index system in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2021, 37(33):98-104. DOI
[3]	徐新良, 陈建洪, 张雄一. 我国农田面源污染时空演变特征分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(12):157-165.
	XU Xinliang, CHEN Jianghong, ZHANG Xiongyi. Analysis on the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of agricultural non-point source pollution China[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(12):157-165.
[4]	Ruan W B, Ren T, Chen Q, et al. Effects of conventional and reduced N inputs on nematode communities and plant yield under intensive vegetable production[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2013, 66(2): 48-55. DOI URL
[5]	郝小雨, 马星竹, 周宝库. 长期单施有机肥黑土大豆产量和土壤理化性质演变特征[J]. 土壤与作物, 2018, 7(2):222-228.
	HAO Xiaoyu, MA Xingzhu, ZHOU Baoku. Variation characteristics of soybean yield and soil physicochemical properties after long-term organic fertilizer application in black soil[J]. Soils and Crops, 2018, 7(2):222-228.
[6]	匡恩俊, 李梓瑄, 迟凤琴, 等. 耕地方式与有机肥配施对大豆产量及土壤养分特征的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2020, 39(1):108-115.
	KUANG Enjun, LI Zixuan, CHI Fengqin, et al. Effect of different plough and organic fertilizer on characteristics of soybean yield and soil nutrients[J]. Soybean Science, 2020, 39(1):108-115.
[7]	胡可, 李华兴, 卢维盛, 等. 生物有机肥对土壤微生物活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 18(2):303-306.
	HU Ke, LI Huaxing, LU Weisheng, et al. Effect of microbial organic fertilizer application on soil microbial activity[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2011, 18(2):303-306.
[8]	Shiomi Y, Masaya N, Tomoko O, et al. Comparison of bacterial community structure in the rhizosphere of tomato plants grown in soils suppressive and conducive towards bacterial wilt[J]. Appl Environ Microb, 1999, 65:3996-4001. DOI PMID
[9]	孙炜, 樊雪梅. 生物有机肥料对大豆生育性状和产量的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2009,(5):63-64.
	SUN Wei, FAN Xuemei. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on growth traits and yield of soybean[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2009,(5):63-64.
[10]	路宪春, 于文清, 刘文志, 等. 生物有机肥与化肥配施对大豆生物性状及产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2014,(1):17-19.
	LU Xianchun, YU Wenqing, LIU Wenzhi, et al. Effects of combined application of bio-organic fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on biological characters and yield of soybean[J]. Modern Agriculture, 2014,(1):17-19.
[11]	张奇, 张振华, 陈雅玲, 等. 施用生物有机肥对土壤特性、作物品质及产量影响的研究进展[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(15):71-76.
	ZHANG Qi, ZHANG Zhenhua, CHEN Yaling, et al. Research progress on effects of bio-organic fertilizer application on soil characteristics, crop quality and yield[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(15):71-76.
[12]	胡英宏, 任泽广, 杨姝钰, 等. 生物有机肥对菠萝心腐病发生和土壤细菌群落结构的影响[J/OL]. 应用与环境生物学报,1-12[2021-12-24].
	HU Yinghong, REN Zeguang, YANG Shuyu, et al. Effects of bio-organic fertilizers on pineapple heart rot and bacterial community structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 1-12[2021-12-24]
[13]	苏煜, 黄劭理. 增施生物有机肥对烤烟光合特性及根际土壤微生物的影响[J/OL]. 中国农业科技,1-8[2021-12-24].
	SU Yi, HUANG Shaoli. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on flue-cured tobacco photosynthetic characteristics and rhizosphere soil microorganism[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology,1-8[2021-12-24].
[14]	李远明, 姜妍, 王浩, 等. 重迎茬大豆应用生物有机肥效果研究[J]. 大豆科技, 2013,(6):3-7,10
	LI Yuanming, JIANG Yan, WANG Hao, et al. Application of bio-organic fertilizer in continuous and alternate cropping soybeans[J]. Soybean Science and Technology, 2013,(6):3-7,10.
[15]	中国土壤学会. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版, 2000.
	The Chinese Society of Soil. Soil agricultural chemical anaylysis methods[M]. Beijing: China’s Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000.
[16]	辛惠普, 马汇泉, 刘静茹, 等. 大豆根腐病发生与防治的初步研究[J]. 大豆科学, 1987,(3):189-196.
	XIN Huipu, MA Huiquan, LIU Jingru, et al. A preliminary study on epidemiology and control of disease[J]. Soybean Science, 1987,(3):189-196.
[17]	杨晓贺, 张瑜, 丁俊杰, 等. 黑龙江省东部地区大豆根腐病调查研究初报[J]. 大豆科学, 2015, 34(6):1093-1096.
	YANG Xiaohe, ZHANG Yu, DING Junjie, et al. Preliminary investigation report on Soybean root rot in the eastern of Heilongjiang Province[J]. Soybean Science, 2015, 34(6):1093-1096.
[18]	张静, 杨江舟, 胡伟, 等. 生物有机肥对大豆红冠腐病及土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2012, 31(3):548-554.
	ZHANG Jing, YANG Jiangzhou, HU Wei, et al. Effect of biological organic fertilizer on soybean red crown rot and soil enzyme activities[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2012, 31(3):548-554.
[19]	台莲梅, 郭永霞, 张亚玲, 等. 木霉生防菌对大豆幼苗的促生作用及对根腐病的防治效果[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(11):4820-4821.
	TAI Lianmei, GUO Yongxia, ZHANG Yaling, et al. The promoting Effects and Control of root rot on soybean by trichoderma biocontrol strains[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 41(11):4820-4821.
[20]	朱宝国, 于忠和, 王囡囡, 等. 有机肥和化肥不同比例配施对大豆产量和品质的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2010, 29(1):97-100.
	ZHU Baoguo, YU Zhonghe, WANG Nannan, et al. Effect of different proportion combined application of organic and chemical fertilizer on soybean yield and quality[J]. Soybean Science, 2010, 29(1):97-100.
[21]	田艳洪, 赵晓锋, 刘玉娥, 等. 不同有机肥用量对大豆植株生长及产量的影响[J]. 大豆科学, 2018, 37(4):578-584.
	TIAN Yanhong, ZHAO Xiaofeng, LIU Yue, et al. Effects of different dosages of organic fertilizer on the growth and yield of soybean[J]. Soybean Science, 2018, 37(4):578-584.
[22]	李鸣雷, 谷洁, 高华, 等. 不同有机肥对大豆植株性状、品质和产量的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,(9):67-72.
	LI Minglei, GU Jie, GAO Hua, et al. Effects of different organic fertilizer on plant character quality and yield of soybean[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University, 2007,(9):67-72.

处理 Treatment	地上干重 Dry matter accumulation per plant(g)	根干重 Root dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤干重 Nodule dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤个数 Number of root nodule per plant	根腐病发病率 Incidence rate of root rot (%)	病情指数 Disease index (%)
T₁	1.07±0.03^b	0.20±0.02^b	0.02±0.01^b	12.56±0.42^b	58.87±3.50^b	33.83±2.60^b
T₂	1.16±0.02^a	0.23±0.02^a	0.03±0.01^a	14.67±0.44^a	52.60±3.24^a	28.27±2.35^a
T₃	1.21±0.03^a	0.24±0.02^a	0.04±0.01^a	15.92±0.45^a	51.07±3.27^a	27.83±3.53^a
T₄	1.20±0.03^a	0.22±0.03^a	0.04±0.01^a	15.72±0.43^a	52.40±3.10^a	27.90±3.50^a
T₅	1.19±0.02^a	0.23±0.02^a	0.03±0.01^a	14.11±0.42^a	49.30±3.65^a	27.33±2.12^a

处理 Treatment	地上干重 Dry matter accumulation per plant(g)	根干重 Root dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤干重 Nodule dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤个数 Number of root nodule per plant	根腐病发病率 Incidence rate of root rot (%)	病情指数 Disease index (%)
T₁	1.07±0.03^b	0.20±0.02^b	0.02±0.01^b	12.56±0.42^b	58.87±3.50^b	33.83±2.60^b
T₂	1.16±0.02^a	0.23±0.02^a	0.03±0.01^a	14.67±0.44^a	52.60±3.24^a	28.27±2.35^a
T₃	1.21±0.03^a	0.24±0.02^a	0.04±0.01^a	15.92±0.45^a	51.07±3.27^a	27.83±3.53^a
T₄	1.20±0.03^a	0.22±0.03^a	0.04±0.01^a	15.72±0.43^a	52.40±3.10^a	27.90±3.50^a
T₅	1.19±0.02^a	0.23±0.02^a	0.03±0.01^a	14.11±0.42^a	49.30±3.65^a	27.33±2.12^a

处理 Treatment	地上干物质 Dry matter accumulation per plant(g)	根干重 Root dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤干重 Nodule dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤个数 Number of root nodule per plant
T₁	5.27±0.15^b	0.78±0.02^b	0.12±0.02^b	19.20±0.62^cB
T₂	5.73±0.15^a	0.88±0.04^a	0.17±0.03^a	25.60±0.83^aA
T₃	5.79±0.17^a	0.89±0.06^a	0.18±0.03^a	26.40±0.75^aA
T₄	5.75±0.13^a	0.86±0.06^a	0.15±0.02^a	23.20±0.65^abA
T₅	5.72±0.14^a	0.87±0.05^a	0.14±0.02^ab	21.60±0.54^bB

处理 Treatment	地上干物质 Dry matter accumulation per plant(g)	根干重 Root dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤干重 Nodule dry weight per plant(g)	根瘤个数 Number of root nodule per plant
T₁	5.27±0.15^b	0.78±0.02^b	0.12±0.02^b	19.20±0.62^cB
T₂	5.73±0.15^a	0.88±0.04^a	0.17±0.03^a	25.60±0.83^aA
T₃	5.79±0.17^a	0.89±0.06^a	0.18±0.03^a	26.40±0.75^aA
T₄	5.75±0.13^a	0.86±0.06^a	0.15±0.02^a	23.20±0.65^abA
T₅	5.72±0.14^a	0.87±0.05^a	0.14±0.02^ab	21.60±0.54^bB

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height (cm)	单株荚数 Valid pod per plant	单株粒数 Grain number per plant	百粒重 100-grain weight (g)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	增产 Yield increase rate(%)
T₁	98.42±2.12^bB	33.14±1.87^bB	68.43±1.58^bB	22.19±0.19^a	2 358.21±16.21^bB	—
T₂	106.56±2.27^aA	36.57±2.01^aA	73.29±1.74^aA	23.69±0.25^a	2 538.77±20.17^aA	7.11
T₃	107.25±2.65^aA	38.77±2.23^aA	75.45±1.83^aA	23.78±0.23^a	2 562.72±22.36^aA	8.67
T₄	105.73±2.48^aA	36.80±1.98^aA	72.73±1.76^aA	23.59±0.26^a	2 529.18±21.14^aA	7.25
T₅	106.32±2.23^aA	37.13±1.94^aA	73.41±1.85^aA	23.70±0.23^a	2 542.53±20.23^aA	7.82

不同生物有机肥配施化肥对大豆植株生长、抗病及产量的影响

Effects of different bio-organic fertilizers application combined with conventional fertilization on growth, disease resistance and yield of soybean

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 22

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

处理 Treatment	株高 Plant height (cm)	单株荚数 Valid pod per plant	单株粒数 Seed number per plant	百粒重 100-seed weight (g)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	增产 Yield increase rate(%)
T₁	97.67±2.53^bB	32.22±1.91^bB	78.43±2.17^bB	18.19±0.06^a	2 258.47±19.88^bB	—
T₂	101.63±1.96^aA	37.57±2.10^aA	83.29±1.98^aA	18.69±0.31^a	2 446.77±23.09^aA	8.34
T₃	103.30±3.26^aA	41.77±2.25^aA	85.45±1.94^aA	18.78±0.13^a	2 457.72±28.04^aA	8.82
T₄	102.33±2.95^aA	35.80±1.90^aA	82.73±1.80^aA	18.59±0.36^a	2 405.18±26.15^aA	6.50
T₅	101.37±2.40^aA	38.13±1.86^aA	83.41±2.68^aA	18.70±0.43^a	2 438.98±28.17^aA	7.99

处理 Treatments	肥料成本 Cost of fertilizer				大豆产值 Soybean production value		效益值 (元/hm²) Benefit value (yuan/hm²)
处理 Treatments	生物肥用量 Dosage of bio-fertilizer (kg/hm²)	生物肥成本 (元/hm²)Cost of bio-fertilizer (yuan/hm²)	化肥成本 (元/hm²) Cost of chemical fertilizer (yuan/hm²)	肥料成本总和 (元/hm²) Total cost of fertilizer (yuan/hm²)	产量 Yield (kg/hm²)	产值 (元/hm²) Production value (yuan/hm²)	效益值 (元/hm²) Benefit value (yuan/hm²)
T₁	—	—	885	885	2 358.21	13 677.62	12 792.62
T₂	30	120	885	1 005	2 538.77	14 724.87	13 719.87
T₃	30	120	885	1 005	2 562.72	14 863.78	13 858.78
T₄	30	120	885	1 005	2 529.18	14 669.24	13 664.24
T₅	30	135	885	1 020	2 542.53	14 746.67	13 726.67

[1]	陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108.
[2]	杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145.
[3]	陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151.
[4]	王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
[5]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[6]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[7]	杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188.
[8]	马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313.
[9]	王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.
[10]	董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857.
[11]	李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872.
[12]	张永强, 陈传信, 聂石辉, 徐其江, 赛力汗·赛, 雷钧杰. 矮壮素滴施时期对冬小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力的调控分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878.
[13]	张超, 白云岗, 郑明, 肖军, 丁平. 极端干旱区葡萄水肥协同效应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939.
[14]	王挺, 张力, 张凡凡, 黄嵘峥, 李肖, 张玉琳, 陈永成, 赵建涛, 马春晖. 适合青贮的玉米品种生产性能筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1596-1605.
[15]	时晓磊, 丁孙磊, 丛花, 张金波, 曲可佳, 王兴州, 韩岱, 严勇亮. 夏播大豆产量相关性状灰色关联度分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1641-1652.