PEG模拟干旱胁迫下藜麦萌发期抗旱性评价

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.09.003

新疆农业科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 56 ›› Issue (9): 1588-1596.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2019.09.003

• 作物遗传育种·种质资源·分子生物学 • 上一篇下一篇

PEG模拟干旱胁迫下藜麦萌发期抗旱性评价

姚庆¹, 秦培友², 苗昊翠³, 陈晓露¹, 张学超¹, 崔宏亮¹

1.新疆伊犁州农业科学研究所,新疆伊宁 835000;
2.中国农业科学院作物科学研究所,北京 100081;
3.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091

收稿日期:2019-06-25 发布日期:2019-10-30
通信作者: 崔宏亮(1981-),男,助理研究员,研究方向为作物栽培及生理,(E-mail)chl8129@126.com
秦培友(1982-),副研究员,博士,研究方向为作物品质分析及评价,(E-mail)qinpeiyou@caas.cn
作者简介:姚庆(1986-),男,研究实习员,研究方向为作物栽培,(E-mail)452760959@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2018D01B35)

Drought Resistance Evaluation of Quinoa during Germination under PEG Simulated Drought Stress

YAO Qing¹ , QIN Pei-you², MIAO Hao-cui³ , CHEN Xiao-lu¹, ZHANG Xue-chao¹, CUI Hong-liang¹

1.Institute of Agricultural Sciences of Ili Prefecture,Yining, Xinjiang 835000,China;
2.Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
3.Institute of Crop Germplasm Resources, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2019-06-25 Published:2019-10-30
Correspondence author: CUI Hong-liang(1981-),liang, male, assistant researcher, mainly engaged in crop cultivation and physiological research,(E-mail)chl8129@126.com
QIN Pei-you(1982-), associate researcher, doctor, mainly engaged in crop quality analysis and evaluation, (E-mail) qinpeiyou@caas.cn
Supported by:
Supported by the Natural Science Foundation Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region of China (2018D01B35)

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】研究与评价PEG模拟干旱胁迫下10个藜麦品种的萌芽期抗旱性。【方法】采用5%~30%不同浓度PEG-6000溶液模拟干旱胁迫条件。【结果】低浓度PEG-6000对藜麦种子萌发及根长具有促进作用,对茎长有一定的抑制作用。随着PEG-6000浓度增大,所有抗旱指标均下降。【结论】利用隶属函数分析得出,10个藜麦品种萌发期抗旱性强弱顺序为:YL2＞YL1＞YL7＞YL3＞YL9＞YL5＞YL10＞YL6＞YL8＞YL4。为较好的反映藜麦品种在不同胁迫程度的耐受能力,将10个藜麦品种划分为三个抗旱级别:YL1、YL2、YL7为强耐旱品种; YL3、YL9为中等耐旱品种;YL4、YL5、YL6、YL8、YL10为弱耐旱品种。

关键词: 藜麦; 萌发期; 干旱胁迫

Abstract: 【Objective】 Study the drought resistance of 10 quinoa varieties in germination stage. 【Method】In this experiment, PEG-6000 solution with different concentrations of 5%-30% were used to simulate drought stress conditions.【Result】 The results showed that the low concentrations of PEG-6000 promoted seed germination and root length of quinoa and inhibited stem length. 【Conclusion】 According to the analysis of membership function, drought resistance of 10 quinoa varieties at germination stage was: YL2＞YL1＞YL7＞YL3＞YL9＞YL5＞YL10＞YL6＞YL8＞YL4. The quinoa varieties were divided into three drought resistance levels: YL1 , YL2 and YL7 were drought-tolerant varieties,YL3 and YL9 were medium drought-tolerant varieties,YL4, YL5, YL6, YL8 and YL10 were weak drought-tolerant varieties.

Key words: quinoa; seeds germination; drought-resistance

中图分类号:

S519

姚庆, 秦培友, 苗昊翠, 陈晓露, 张学超, 崔宏亮. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下藜麦萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(9): 1588-1596.

YAO Qing , QIN Pei-you, MIAO Hao-cui , CHEN Xiao-lu, ZHANG Xue-chao, CUI Hong-liang. Drought Resistance Evaluation of Quinoa during Germination under PEG Simulated Drought Stress[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 56(9): 1588-1596.

参考文献

[1] Antonio Vega-Gálvez, Miranda, M. , Vergara, J. , Uribe, E. , Puente, L. , & Enrique A Martínez. (2010). Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (chenopodium quinoa willd.), an ancient andean grain: a review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 90(15):2,541-2,547..
[2] Zurita-Silva, A., Fuentes, Francisco, Zamora, Pablo, Jacobsen, Sven-Erik, & Schwember, Andrés R. (2014). Breeding quinoa (chenopodium quinoawilld.): potential and perspectives. Molecular Breeding, 34(1):13-30.
[3] Oelke, E. A,Putnam, D. H,Teynor, T. M.,et al. (1992). Altemative field crops manual. Madison:Center for Alternative Plant and Animal Products,University of Wisconsin Cooperative Extension Service.
[4] 刘锁荣,范文虎.促进山西黎麦种植规模化及产业链形成的建议[J].山西农业科学,2011,29(7):767-769.
    LIU Suo-rong, FAN Wen-hu. (2011). Suggestions on promoting the large-scale planting and industrial chain formation of Shanxi Limai [J]. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences 29 (7): 767-769. (in Chinese)
[5] 王可玢,许春辉,赵福洪,等.水分胁迫对小麦旗叶某些体内体内叶绿素A荧光参数的影响[J].生物物理学报,1997,13(2):273-278.
   WANG Ke-fen, XU Chun-hui, ZHAO Fu-hong, et al. (1997). Effects of water stress on chlorophyll A fluorescence parameters in wheat flag leaves [J]. Acta Biophysics Sinica, 13(2): 273-278. (in Chinese)
[6] 鹏珂珊,徐宣斌,胡普辉,等.干旱是西部地区生态系统受损的关键因素[J].石家庄经济学院学报,2002,25(3):257-262.
   PENG Ke-shan, XU Xuan-bin, HU Pu-hui, et al. (2002). Drought is the key factor of ecosystem damage in western China [J]. Journal of Shijiazhuang University of Economics, 25(3): 257-262. (in Chinese)
[7] Jarvis, D., E, Lightfoot. D/ J, et al. (2017). The genome of Chenopodium quinoa. Nature, 542(7641): 307-312.
[8] Jianxia, L. , Runmei, W. , Wenying, L. , Hongli, Z. , Yaodong, G. , & Riyu, W. (2018). Genome-wide characterization of heat-shock protein 70s from chenopodium quinoa and expression analyses of cqhsp70s in response to drought stress. Genes, 9(2):35.
[9] 黄杰,刘文瑜,魏玉明,等.4个藜麦品种在陇东旱作区幼苗生长量及生理生化指标分析[J].甘肃农业科技,2017,(10):35-38.
   HUANG Jie, LIU Wen-yu, WEI Yu-ming, et al. (2017). Analysis of seedling growth and physiological and biochemical indexes of four quinoa varieties in Longdong dry farming area [J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, (10): 35-38. (in Chinese)
[10] 崔宏亮,姚庆,苗昊翠,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下花生品种萌发特性与抗旱性评价[J].核农学报,2017,31(7):1 412-1 418.
   CUI Hong-liang, YAO Qing, MIAO Hao-cui, et al. (2017). Evaluation of germination characteristics and drought resistance of peanut varieties under PEG simulated drought stress [J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica, 31(7): 1,412-1,418. (in Chinese)
[11] 肖亮,易自立,段楚青,等.水分胁迫对芒草种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].中国草地学报,2014,36(3):41-46.
   XIAO Liang, YI Zi-li, DUAN Chu-qin, et al. (2014). Effects of water stress on seed germination and seedling growth of miscanem [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 36(3): 41-46. (in Chinese)
[12] 李培英,孙宗玖,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下29份偃麦草种质种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J].中国草地学报,2010,32(1):32-38.
   LI Pei-ying, SUN Zong-jiu, et al. (2010).Evaluation of drought resistance of 29 germplasm seeds of agropyridinium under simulated drought stress [J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 32(1): 32-38. (in Chinese)
[13] 齐淑艳,段继鹏,郭婷婷,等.入侵植物牛膝菊种子萌发对PEG模拟干旱胁迫的响应[J].生态学杂志,2014,33(5):1 190-1 194.
    QI Shu-yan, DUAN Ji-peng, GUO Ting-ting, et al. (2014). Response of seed germination of invasive plant cyperus bidentata to PEG simulated drought stress [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 33(5): 1,190-1,194. (in Chinese)
[14] 吕亚慈,郭晓丽,石丽冉,等.不同藜麦品种萌发期抗旱性研究[J].种子,2018,37(6):86-89.
   LÜ Ya-ci, GUO Xiao-li, SHI Li-ran, et al. (2018). Study on drought resistance of different quinoa varieties during germination [J]. Seed, 37(6): 86-89. (in Chinese)
[15] 姚玉波.不同品种亚麻种子萌发期抗旱性鉴定[J].核农学报,2015,29(10):2 033-2 039.
   YAO Yu-bo. (2015). identification of drought resistance of flax seeds during germination [J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica , 29(10): 2,033-2,039. (in Chinese)
[16] 徐振朋,宛涛,蔡萍,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫对罗布麻种子萌发及生理特性的影响[J].中国草地学报,2015,37(5):75-80.
   XU Zhen-peng, WAN Tao, CAI Ping, et al. (2015). Effects of PEG simulated drought stress on seed germination and physiological characteristics of p. chinensis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica,37(5): 75-80. (in Chinese)
[17] 吴伟,陈学珍,谢皓,等.干旱胁迫下大豆抗旱性鉴定[J].分子植物育种,2005,3(2):188-194.
   WU Wei, CHEN Xue-zhen, XIE Hao, et al. (2005). Identification of drought resistance of soybean under drought stress [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 3(2): 188-194. (in Chinese)
[18] 王学志,曹敏建,蒋文春.抗旱剂处理对玉米种子的萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J].玉米科学,2005,13(2):82-84.
    WANG Xue-zhi, CAO Min-jian, JIANG Wen-chun. (2005). Effects of drought-resistant treatment on seed germination and seedling growth of maize [J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 13(2): 82-84. (in Chinese)
[19] 周伟,侯建华,高志军.玉米芽苗期抗旱性鉴定指标的选取[J].玉米科学,2008,16(5):66-69.
   ZHOU Wei, HOU Jian-hua, GAO Zhi-jun. (2008). Selection of drought resistance evaluation indexes for maize sprouts and seedlings [J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 16(5): 66-69. (in Chinese)
[20] 牛瑞明,王艳,吴桂丽,等.裸燕麦种子萌发对模拟干旱胁迫的响应及耐旱性综合评价[J].麦类作物学报,2011,31(4):753-756.
    NIU Rui-ming, WANG Yan, WU Gui-li, et al. (2011). Response of naked oat seed germination to simulated drought stress and comprehensive evaluation of drought tolerance [J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 31(4): 753-756. (in Chinese)
[21] 吴桂丽,郜玉珍,马素峰,等.不同亚麻品种萌发期抗旱性研究[J].河南农业科学,2012,41(12):52-55.
   WU Gui-li, GAO Yu-zhen, MA Su-feng, et al. (2012). Drought resistance of different flax varieties during germination [J]. Henan Agricultural Sciences, 41(12): 52-55. (in Chinese)
[22] 秦文静,梁宗锁.四种豆科牧草萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J].草业学报,2010,19(4):61-70.
   QIN Wen-jing, LIANG Zong-suo. (2010). Response to drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance of four leguminous herbage during germination [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 19(4): 61-70. (in Chinese)
[23] 孙艳茹,石屹,陈国军,等.PEG模拟干旱胁迫下8种绿肥作物萌发特性与抗旱性评价[J].草业学报,2015,24(3):89-98.
   SUN Yan-ru, SHI Yi, CHEN Guo-jun, et al. (2015). Evaluation of germination characteristics and drought resistance of 8 green manure crops under simulated drought stress by PEG [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 24 (3):89-98. (in Chinese)
[24] 罗永忠,李广.土壤水分胁迫对新疆大叶苜蓿的生长及生物量的影响[J].草业学报,2014,23(4):213-219.
   LUO Yong-zhong, LI Guang. (2014). Effects of soil water stress on growth and biomass of alfalfa in Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 23(4): 213-219.
[25] 杨景宁,王彦荣.PEG模拟干旱胁迫对四种荒漠植物种子萌发的影响[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):23-29.
   YANG Jing-ning, WANG Yan-rong. (2012). Effects of PEG on seed germination of four desert plants under simulated drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 21(6): 23-29. (in Chinese)
[26] 罗俊杰,欧巧明,叶春雷,等.主要胡麻品种抗旱相关指标分析及综合评价[J].核农学报,2014,28(11):2 015-2 125.
   LUO Jun-jie, OU Qiao-ming, YE Chun-lei, et al. (2014). Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of drought-resistant indexes of main flax varieties [J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica, 28 (11): 2,015-2,,125. (in Chinese)
[27]李志博,章杰,魏亦农,等.覆膜高密度下棉花抗旱性产量和品质指标的特征分析[J].核农学报,2011,25(3):576-581.
   LI Zhi-bo, ZHANG Jie, WEI Yi-nong, et al. (2011). Characteristic analysis of cotton drought resistance yield and quality index under high density mulching [J]. Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica, 25(3): 576-581. (in Chinese)

PEG模拟干旱胁迫下藜麦萌发期抗旱性评价

Drought Resistance Evaluation of Quinoa during Germination under PEG Simulated Drought Stress

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172.
[2]	向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181.
[3]	宋冰梅, 姜岩, 陈鑫, 张宇, 程宛楠, 潘洪生. 新型转基因高产棉花萌发期和苗期耐盐性与耐碱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2239-2247.
[4]	米尔扎提·木塔力甫, 石秀楠, 柏军兵, 祖拜代·阿布都克日木, 吾勒加勒哈斯·阿扎提, 石书兵. 不同脱绒方式及PEG胁迫下对棉花种子活力及幼苗性状的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1561-1568.
[5]	王兴州, 时晓磊, 张恒, 曲可佳, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. 引进春小麦品种萌发期耐盐性鉴定及评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362.
[6]	曲可佳, 时晓磊, 张恒, 王兴州, 耿洪伟, 丁孙磊, 张金波, 严勇亮. PEG处理下引进春小麦品种苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1363-1371.
[7]	邵盘霞, 赵准, 邵武奎, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 李建平, 胡文冉, 黄全生. 玉米ZmCDPK22基因在干旱胁迫下的表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1372-1378.
[8]	汤东, 安玉光, 程平, 李宏, 杨建军, 王凯. 天山北坡前山带典型灌木光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(6): 1531-1539.
[9]	姚庆, 阿里别里根·哈孜太, 杨明花, 李强, 苗昊翠, 崔宏亮. 藜麦种子对萌发温度的响应及低温胁迫萌发能力鉴定[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1141-1149.
[10]	陈果, 郝晓燕, 高升旗, 胡文冉, 赵准, 黄全生. 玉米钙依赖蛋白激酶全基因组鉴定及抗旱表达分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 857-864.
[11]	冯彩军, 宋瑞娇, 宋凌宇, 张松, 齐军仓. 2,4-表芸苔素内酯浸种对干旱胁迫下大麦种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 309-316.
[12]	宋凌宇, 齐军仓, 张松, 邱英, 尚纪霏, 冯彩军. 不同硅处理方式对干旱胁迫下大麦萌发的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(2): 317-325.
[13]	单莹, 李越, 徐敏, 刘艳珍, 李冉, 陈捷胤, 王子胜, 朱鹤. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下辽棉系列品种种子萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(11): 2653-2660.
[14]	祖力皮牙·买买提, 毛红艳, 岳丽, 王佳敏, 于明. 三色藜麦抗氧化活性及体外消化特性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2461-2469.
[15]	郑子漂, 徐海江, 崔建平, 林涛, 郭仁松, 王亮, 张大伟, 魏鑫, 孔繁阳. 水分胁迫对陆地棉生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1821-1830.