新疆农业科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (8): 1821-1830.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.08.001
• 作物遗传育种·分子遗传学·耕作栽培·生理生化 • 上一篇 下一篇
郑子漂(), 徐海江(), 崔建平, 林涛, 郭仁松, 王亮, 张大伟, 魏鑫, 孔繁阳
收稿日期:
2021-11-01
出版日期:
2022-08-20
发布日期:
2022-10-01
通信作者:
徐海江
作者简介:
郑子漂(1991-),男,福建尤溪人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为棉花遗传育种与高效栽培,(E-mail) zzpn001@126.com
基金资助:
ZHENG Zipiao(), XU Haijiang(), CUI Jianping, LIN Tao, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHANG Dawei, WEI Xin, KONG fanyang
Received:
2021-11-01
Online:
2022-08-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Correspondence author:
XU Haijiang
Supported by:
摘要:
【目的】研究水分胁迫对不同棉花品种生长发育的影响,筛选出抗旱种质资源,为棉花抗旱新品种选育提供依据。【方法】以11份陆地棉品种(系)为材料,设置正常灌水(3 600 m3/hm2)与水分胁迫(1 800 m3/hm2)2个处理,研究陆地棉在水分胁迫与正常灌水下生育进程、形态指标、干物质积累、抗氧化酶活性变化以及产量构成因素的差异。【结果】参试材料生育期缩短1~5 d;棉花生育期缺水抑制了棉花植株的生长,果枝量减少、单株铃数降低;水分胁迫下参试材料棉株干物质积累量在蕾期、花铃期、絮期分别下降0.70 、5.68、2.18 g/株。有效铃数减少0.89g/株,单铃重平均下降0.23 g,籽棉减产幅度达到1.93%~37.14%。水分胁迫下11个参试品种(系)的抗氧化酶活性发生变化,3个参试品种(系)的SOD、POD、CAT活性均升高。【结论】参试材料9号、2号在水分胁迫下生长发育情况较好,棉花减产不显著,为抗旱性较好的棉花品种。
中图分类号:
郑子漂, 徐海江, 崔建平, 林涛, 郭仁松, 王亮, 张大伟, 魏鑫, 孔繁阳. 水分胁迫对陆地棉生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 1821-1830.
ZHENG Zipiao, XU Haijiang, CUI Jianping, LIN Tao, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHANG Dawei, WEI Xin, KONG fanyang. Effects of Water Stress on Growth and Development in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(8): 1821-1830.
编号 Code | 品种名称 Cotton varieties | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|
1 | 新陆中75号 | 推广品种 |
2 | AW1431 | 自育品系 |
3 | J206-5 | 推广品种 |
4 | AW1443 | 自育品系 |
5 | 新陆中54号 | 推广品种 |
6 | ZJL1119 | 自育品系 |
7 | 新陆中71号 | 推广品种 |
8 | ZJL1413 | 自育品系 |
9 | 3D12003 | 引进品系 |
10 | 巴43497 | 引进品系 |
11 | MS1603 | 引进品系 |
表 1 棉花品种(系)编号及名称
Table 1 Code and name of cotton varieties(strains)
编号 Code | 品种名称 Cotton varieties | 来源 Source |
---|---|---|
1 | 新陆中75号 | 推广品种 |
2 | AW1431 | 自育品系 |
3 | J206-5 | 推广品种 |
4 | AW1443 | 自育品系 |
5 | 新陆中54号 | 推广品种 |
6 | ZJL1119 | 自育品系 |
7 | 新陆中71号 | 推广品种 |
8 | ZJL1413 | 自育品系 |
9 | 3D12003 | 引进品系 |
10 | 巴43497 | 引进品系 |
11 | MS1603 | 引进品系 |
处理 Treatments | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 播种-出苗 Sowing- Seedling (d) | 出苗-现蕾 Seedling- Budding (d) | 现蕾-开花 Budding- Flowering (d) | 开花-吐絮 Flowering- Boll opening (d) | 生育期 Growth stages (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 9 | 46 | 25 | 59 | 131 |
2 | 9 | 47 | 23 | 62 | 132 | |
3 | 10 | 46 | 24 | 59 | 129 | |
4 | 11 | 44 | 24 | 54 | 122 | |
5 | 9 | 47 | 25 | 57 | 128 | |
6 | 10 | 47 | 24 | 58 | 129 | |
7 | 10 | 48 | 24 | 66 | 138 | |
8 | 9 | 48 | 22 | 50 | 123 | |
9 | 9 | 46 | 22 | 57 | 125 | |
10 | 11 | 46 | 22 | 59 | 127 | |
11 | 8 | 48 | 21 | 61 | 130 | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 10 | 45 | 24 | 58 | 126 |
2 | 9 | 46 | 24 | 58 | 128 | |
3 | 11 | 46 | 23 | 60 | 128 | |
4 | 13 | 44 | 23 | 54 | 121 | |
5 | 10 | 46 | 23 | 56 | 125 | |
6 | 11 | 46 | 26 | 57 | 128 | |
7 | 9 | 50 | 22 | 63 | 136 | |
8 | 8 | 48 | 23 | 51 | 122 | |
9 | 8 | 46 | 22 | 55 | 123 | |
10 | 13 | 43 | 25 | 58 | 125 | |
11 | 9 | 47 | 23 | 59 | 129 |
表 2 水分胁迫下棉花生育进程变化
Table 2 Effects of water stress on the growth progress of cotton
处理 Treatments | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 播种-出苗 Sowing- Seedling (d) | 出苗-现蕾 Seedling- Budding (d) | 现蕾-开花 Budding- Flowering (d) | 开花-吐絮 Flowering- Boll opening (d) | 生育期 Growth stages (d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 9 | 46 | 25 | 59 | 131 |
2 | 9 | 47 | 23 | 62 | 132 | |
3 | 10 | 46 | 24 | 59 | 129 | |
4 | 11 | 44 | 24 | 54 | 122 | |
5 | 9 | 47 | 25 | 57 | 128 | |
6 | 10 | 47 | 24 | 58 | 129 | |
7 | 10 | 48 | 24 | 66 | 138 | |
8 | 9 | 48 | 22 | 50 | 123 | |
9 | 9 | 46 | 22 | 57 | 125 | |
10 | 11 | 46 | 22 | 59 | 127 | |
11 | 8 | 48 | 21 | 61 | 130 | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 10 | 45 | 24 | 58 | 126 |
2 | 9 | 46 | 24 | 58 | 128 | |
3 | 11 | 46 | 23 | 60 | 128 | |
4 | 13 | 44 | 23 | 54 | 121 | |
5 | 10 | 46 | 23 | 56 | 125 | |
6 | 11 | 46 | 26 | 57 | 128 | |
7 | 9 | 50 | 22 | 63 | 136 | |
8 | 8 | 48 | 23 | 51 | 122 | |
9 | 8 | 46 | 22 | 55 | 123 | |
10 | 13 | 43 | 25 | 58 | 125 | |
11 | 9 | 47 | 23 | 59 | 129 |
处理 Treatment | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 蕾期 Seedling stage | 花铃期 Boll forming stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch (台) | 蕾数 Bud number (个) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch (台) | 花/蕾/铃数 Bud/flower/boll number(个) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch (台) | 铃数 Bud number (个) | ||
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 52.35abcd | 5.09a | 6.16a | 71.07abcd | 8.40abc | 11.42cde | 77.60ab | 8.85abcde | 5.17abcde |
2 | 45.63bcd | 4.55ab | 5.70a | 56.13ef | 8.61abcde | 10.59cde | 66.40bcdef | 9.02abcd | 4.53bcde | |
3 | 45.76bcde | 4.44ab | 5.37ab | 62.00bcdef | 8.45abcde | 15.71ab | 69.00bcdef | 8.44bcde | 5.56abcde | |
4 | 45.74bcde | 4.98a | 6.06a | 69.02abcd | 8.52abcde | 11.73bcd | 75.73ab | 9.09abcde | 5.13abcde | |
5 | 42.66bcde | 4.21abcd | 5.41abc | 62.67abcdef | 8.69abcd | 11.58cde | 71.73bcd | 9.54ab | 6.65ab | |
6 | 52.71abc | 4.59ab | 5.70a | 71.87abc | 9.59a | 17.33a | 84.13a | 9.97a | 6.34abc | |
7 | 49.40bcde | 4.81a | 5.60a | 59.60bcdef | 6.72e | 15.07abc | 68.40bcdef | 8.46abcde | 4.93abcd | |
8 | 54.36ab | 4.51ab | 5.50abc | 74.25ab | 7.41cde | 7.04fg | 83.13a | 9.31abc | 5.40abcde | |
9 | 48.45bcde | 4.64a | 5.75a | 62.47abcde | 8.21abcde | 12.48bcd | 66.07cdefg | 8.70abcde | 6.20abcd | |
10 | 37.87ef | 4.73ab | 6.64a | 51.00efgh | 7.12cde | 9.22defg | 59.13efgh | 8.74abcde | 5.20abcde | |
11 | 42.03cde | 4.63ab | 6.18a | 56.00def | 9.08ab | 11.12cde | 69.67bcde | 9.16abc | 7.06a | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 42.14bcde | 4.81ab | 6.80a | 56.87cdef | 7.88bcde | 11.01def | 65.40cdefg | 8.05cde | 4.40bcde |
2 | 38.11de | 4.81a | 6.28a | 54.00ef | 7.56cde | 11.01def | 55.83gh | 8.41bcde | 4.47bcde | |
3 | 41.36bcde | 4.21abcd | 4.78abcd | 40.53gh | 4.30f | 11.08cde | 64.87defg | 8.78abcde | 5.35abcde | |
4 | 38.34de | 3.34bcde | 3.20cd | 53.80efg | 7.33bcde | 9.79defg | 64.47defg | 8.14bcde | 3.34e | |
5 | 40.11de | 4.12abcd | 4.71abcd | 51.07efgh | 7.87bcde | 6.57fg | 57.60fgh | 8.44abcde | 5.13abcde | |
6 | 40.74de | 2.82de | 3.38bcd | 37.87h | 2.85f | 11.51def | 70.67bcd | 7.93bcde | 5.62abcd | |
7 | 38.37ef | 2.87cde | 3.07d | 52.20efgh | 7.80bcde | 8.66defg | 61.07defgh | 8.06cde | 3.95de | |
8 | 64.84a | 3.83abcde | 4.59abcd | 76.67a | 7.63cde | 7.91efg | 76.70abc | 7.90cde | 4.23cde | |
9 | 46.79bcde | 5.20a | 5.55a | 52.07efgh | 6.92de | 9.90def | 64.27defg | 7.55abcde | 5.75abcde | |
10 | 26.57f | 2.70e | 2.87d | 49.73fgh | 7.12cde | 7.96efg | 50.07h | 7.79e | 4.18cde | |
11 | 42.81bcde | 4.25abc | 5.00abcd | 62.27abcdef | 7.85bcde | 10.83def | 63.20defg | 7.63de | 6.00abcd |
表 3 水分胁迫下棉花主要农艺性状变化
Table 3 Effects of water stress on the agronomic characters of cotton
处理 Treatment | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 蕾期 Seedling stage | 花铃期 Boll forming stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch (台) | 蕾数 Bud number (个) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch (台) | 花/蕾/铃数 Bud/flower/boll number(个) | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 果枝数 Fruit branch (台) | 铃数 Bud number (个) | ||
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 52.35abcd | 5.09a | 6.16a | 71.07abcd | 8.40abc | 11.42cde | 77.60ab | 8.85abcde | 5.17abcde |
2 | 45.63bcd | 4.55ab | 5.70a | 56.13ef | 8.61abcde | 10.59cde | 66.40bcdef | 9.02abcd | 4.53bcde | |
3 | 45.76bcde | 4.44ab | 5.37ab | 62.00bcdef | 8.45abcde | 15.71ab | 69.00bcdef | 8.44bcde | 5.56abcde | |
4 | 45.74bcde | 4.98a | 6.06a | 69.02abcd | 8.52abcde | 11.73bcd | 75.73ab | 9.09abcde | 5.13abcde | |
5 | 42.66bcde | 4.21abcd | 5.41abc | 62.67abcdef | 8.69abcd | 11.58cde | 71.73bcd | 9.54ab | 6.65ab | |
6 | 52.71abc | 4.59ab | 5.70a | 71.87abc | 9.59a | 17.33a | 84.13a | 9.97a | 6.34abc | |
7 | 49.40bcde | 4.81a | 5.60a | 59.60bcdef | 6.72e | 15.07abc | 68.40bcdef | 8.46abcde | 4.93abcd | |
8 | 54.36ab | 4.51ab | 5.50abc | 74.25ab | 7.41cde | 7.04fg | 83.13a | 9.31abc | 5.40abcde | |
9 | 48.45bcde | 4.64a | 5.75a | 62.47abcde | 8.21abcde | 12.48bcd | 66.07cdefg | 8.70abcde | 6.20abcd | |
10 | 37.87ef | 4.73ab | 6.64a | 51.00efgh | 7.12cde | 9.22defg | 59.13efgh | 8.74abcde | 5.20abcde | |
11 | 42.03cde | 4.63ab | 6.18a | 56.00def | 9.08ab | 11.12cde | 69.67bcde | 9.16abc | 7.06a | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 42.14bcde | 4.81ab | 6.80a | 56.87cdef | 7.88bcde | 11.01def | 65.40cdefg | 8.05cde | 4.40bcde |
2 | 38.11de | 4.81a | 6.28a | 54.00ef | 7.56cde | 11.01def | 55.83gh | 8.41bcde | 4.47bcde | |
3 | 41.36bcde | 4.21abcd | 4.78abcd | 40.53gh | 4.30f | 11.08cde | 64.87defg | 8.78abcde | 5.35abcde | |
4 | 38.34de | 3.34bcde | 3.20cd | 53.80efg | 7.33bcde | 9.79defg | 64.47defg | 8.14bcde | 3.34e | |
5 | 40.11de | 4.12abcd | 4.71abcd | 51.07efgh | 7.87bcde | 6.57fg | 57.60fgh | 8.44abcde | 5.13abcde | |
6 | 40.74de | 2.82de | 3.38bcd | 37.87h | 2.85f | 11.51def | 70.67bcd | 7.93bcde | 5.62abcd | |
7 | 38.37ef | 2.87cde | 3.07d | 52.20efgh | 7.80bcde | 8.66defg | 61.07defgh | 8.06cde | 3.95de | |
8 | 64.84a | 3.83abcde | 4.59abcd | 76.67a | 7.63cde | 7.91efg | 76.70abc | 7.90cde | 4.23cde | |
9 | 46.79bcde | 5.20a | 5.55a | 52.07efgh | 6.92de | 9.90def | 64.27defg | 7.55abcde | 5.75abcde | |
10 | 26.57f | 2.70e | 2.87d | 49.73fgh | 7.12cde | 7.96efg | 50.07h | 7.79e | 4.18cde | |
11 | 42.81bcde | 4.25abc | 5.00abcd | 62.27abcdef | 7.85bcde | 10.83def | 63.20defg | 7.63de | 6.00abcd |
理 Treatment | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 蕾期 Seedling stage | 花铃期 Boll forming stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
营养器官 Vegetative organs (g/株) | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs (g/株) | 单株干 物质 Dry matter per plant (g/株) | 营养器官 Vegetative organs (g/株) | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs (g/株) | 单株干 物质 Dry matter per plant (g/株) | 营养器官 Vegetative organs (g/株) | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs (g/株) | 单株干 物质 Dry matter per plant (g/株) | ||
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 19.26 | 0.75 | 20.01bcd | 61.28 | 23.08 | 84.35abcde | 59.65 | 75.67 | 135.32abcde |
2 | 19.44 | 0.79 | 20.23bcd | 54.43 | 27.52 | 81.95abcde | 45.00 | 81.24 | 126.24bcde | |
3 | 18.03 | 0.38 | 18.41cde | 70.89 | 23.21 | 94.10abc | 47.80 | 89.94 | 137.74abcde | |
4 | 21.81 | 0.62 | 22.43abc | 57.88 | 23.38 | 81.26abcde | 68.84 | 102.36 | 171.21ab | |
5 | 20.30 | 0.53 | 20.84abcd | 56.01 | 17.07 | 73.08bcde | 70.05 | 112.19 | 182.24a | |
6 | 19.39 | 0.37 | 19.77bcde | 62.72 | 28.03 | 90.75ab | 62.98 | 83.16 | 146.15abc | |
7 | 18.22 | 0.52 | 18.75cde | 51.43 | 21.38 | 72.81cdef | 46.46 | 59.08 | 105.54cde | |
8 | 21.91 | 0.50 | 22.41abc | 59.94 | 31.07 | 91.01abcd | 68.54 | 74.78 | 143.32abcd | |
9 | 24.34 | 1.09 | 25.43ab | 50.14 | 26.68 | 76.83bcde | 40.73 | 54.72 | 95.45e | |
10 | 14.58 | 0.52 | 15.09de | 45.25 | 29.28 | 74.52bcde | 37.72 | 56.59 | 94.31e | |
11 | 18.72 | 0.72 | 19.45bcde | 59.96 | 21.97 | 81.93abcde | 62.54 | 96.77 | 159.31ab | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 20.00 | 0.79 | 20.79bcd | 44.92 | 24.02 | 68.93ef | 67.67 | 65.22 | 132.90bcde |
2 | 18.51 | 0.85 | 19.35cde | 46.02 | 27.36 | 73.38bcdef | 32.83 | 66.57 | 99.40de | |
3 | 18.62 | 0.69 | 19.30cde | 52.59 | 22.31 | 74.91bcde | 43.84 | 82.93 | 126.78bcde | |
4 | 19.36 | 1.01 | 20.36bcd | 35.48 | 17.29 | 52.76f | 52.98 | 87.47 | 140.45abcde | |
5 | 20.69 | 0.91 | 21.60abcd | 47.77 | 24.46 | 72.23cdef | 44.34 | 60.45 | 104.79cde | |
6 | 18.55 | 0.53 | 19.09cde | 68.14 | 26.63 | 94.77a | 63.36 | 64.65 | 128.01bcde | |
7 | 17.25 | 0.34 | 17.59cde | 50.45 | 20.05 | 70.50def | 57.13 | 48.72 | 105.85cde | |
8 | 18.03 | 0.42 | 18.45cde | 65.13 | 31.77 | 96.90a | 70.65 | 58.59 | 129.24bcde | |
9 | 25.98 | 1.03 | 27.01a | 50.05 | 28.20 | 78.25bcde | 40.09 | 53.58 | 93.67e | |
10 | 12.34 | 0.66 | 13.00e | 43.60 | 26.99 | 70.59def | 39.30 | 61.54 | 100.84de | |
11 | 18.99 | 0.81 | 19.80bcd | 63.35 | 22.27 | 85.62abcde | 74.14 | 82.42 | 156.56ab |
表 4 水分胁迫下棉花干物质积累变化
Table 4 Effects of water stress on the dry matter accumulation of cotton
理 Treatment | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 蕾期 Seedling stage | 花铃期 Boll forming stage | 吐絮期 Boll opening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
营养器官 Vegetative organs (g/株) | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs (g/株) | 单株干 物质 Dry matter per plant (g/株) | 营养器官 Vegetative organs (g/株) | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs (g/株) | 单株干 物质 Dry matter per plant (g/株) | 营养器官 Vegetative organs (g/株) | 生殖器官 Reproductive organs (g/株) | 单株干 物质 Dry matter per plant (g/株) | ||
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 19.26 | 0.75 | 20.01bcd | 61.28 | 23.08 | 84.35abcde | 59.65 | 75.67 | 135.32abcde |
2 | 19.44 | 0.79 | 20.23bcd | 54.43 | 27.52 | 81.95abcde | 45.00 | 81.24 | 126.24bcde | |
3 | 18.03 | 0.38 | 18.41cde | 70.89 | 23.21 | 94.10abc | 47.80 | 89.94 | 137.74abcde | |
4 | 21.81 | 0.62 | 22.43abc | 57.88 | 23.38 | 81.26abcde | 68.84 | 102.36 | 171.21ab | |
5 | 20.30 | 0.53 | 20.84abcd | 56.01 | 17.07 | 73.08bcde | 70.05 | 112.19 | 182.24a | |
6 | 19.39 | 0.37 | 19.77bcde | 62.72 | 28.03 | 90.75ab | 62.98 | 83.16 | 146.15abc | |
7 | 18.22 | 0.52 | 18.75cde | 51.43 | 21.38 | 72.81cdef | 46.46 | 59.08 | 105.54cde | |
8 | 21.91 | 0.50 | 22.41abc | 59.94 | 31.07 | 91.01abcd | 68.54 | 74.78 | 143.32abcd | |
9 | 24.34 | 1.09 | 25.43ab | 50.14 | 26.68 | 76.83bcde | 40.73 | 54.72 | 95.45e | |
10 | 14.58 | 0.52 | 15.09de | 45.25 | 29.28 | 74.52bcde | 37.72 | 56.59 | 94.31e | |
11 | 18.72 | 0.72 | 19.45bcde | 59.96 | 21.97 | 81.93abcde | 62.54 | 96.77 | 159.31ab | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 20.00 | 0.79 | 20.79bcd | 44.92 | 24.02 | 68.93ef | 67.67 | 65.22 | 132.90bcde |
2 | 18.51 | 0.85 | 19.35cde | 46.02 | 27.36 | 73.38bcdef | 32.83 | 66.57 | 99.40de | |
3 | 18.62 | 0.69 | 19.30cde | 52.59 | 22.31 | 74.91bcde | 43.84 | 82.93 | 126.78bcde | |
4 | 19.36 | 1.01 | 20.36bcd | 35.48 | 17.29 | 52.76f | 52.98 | 87.47 | 140.45abcde | |
5 | 20.69 | 0.91 | 21.60abcd | 47.77 | 24.46 | 72.23cdef | 44.34 | 60.45 | 104.79cde | |
6 | 18.55 | 0.53 | 19.09cde | 68.14 | 26.63 | 94.77a | 63.36 | 64.65 | 128.01bcde | |
7 | 17.25 | 0.34 | 17.59cde | 50.45 | 20.05 | 70.50def | 57.13 | 48.72 | 105.85cde | |
8 | 18.03 | 0.42 | 18.45cde | 65.13 | 31.77 | 96.90a | 70.65 | 58.59 | 129.24bcde | |
9 | 25.98 | 1.03 | 27.01a | 50.05 | 28.20 | 78.25bcde | 40.09 | 53.58 | 93.67e | |
10 | 12.34 | 0.66 | 13.00e | 43.60 | 26.99 | 70.59def | 39.30 | 61.54 | 100.84de | |
11 | 18.99 | 0.81 | 19.80bcd | 63.35 | 22.27 | 85.62abcde | 74.14 | 82.42 | 156.56ab |
品种(系) Cotton varieties(strains) | 相对SOD活性 The relative value of SOD activity | 相对POD活性 The relative value of POD activity | 相对CAT活性 The relative value of CAT activity |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.81cd | 1.00bcd | 1.09a |
2 | 1.07bc | 1.02bcd | 1.26a |
3 | 1.02bc | 1.04bcd | 1.27a |
4 | 1.58a | 1.76a | 0.87a |
5 | 0.64d | 0.65d | 1.40a |
6 | 0.86cd | 1.37abc | 1.34a |
7 | 0.96c | 0.85cd | 1.21a |
8 | 0.85cd | 2.05a | 1.11a |
9 | 1.27ab | 1.02bcd | 1.23a |
10 | 0.95c | 0.79d | 1.26a |
11 | 1.45a | 1.51ab | 0.99a |
表 5 水分胁迫下棉花抗氧化酶活性变化
Table 5 Effects of water stress on the antioxidant enzyme activity of cotton
品种(系) Cotton varieties(strains) | 相对SOD活性 The relative value of SOD activity | 相对POD活性 The relative value of POD activity | 相对CAT活性 The relative value of CAT activity |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.81cd | 1.00bcd | 1.09a |
2 | 1.07bc | 1.02bcd | 1.26a |
3 | 1.02bc | 1.04bcd | 1.27a |
4 | 1.58a | 1.76a | 0.87a |
5 | 0.64d | 0.65d | 1.40a |
6 | 0.86cd | 1.37abc | 1.34a |
7 | 0.96c | 0.85cd | 1.21a |
8 | 0.85cd | 2.05a | 1.11a |
9 | 1.27ab | 1.02bcd | 1.23a |
10 | 0.95c | 0.79d | 1.26a |
11 | 1.45a | 1.51ab | 0.99a |
处理 Treatments | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 收获株数 Plant number (104株/hm2) | 有效铃数 Boll number per plant (个/株) | 单铃重 Single boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed Cotton yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 21.45 | 5.17 | 5.60 | 43.37 | 4 328.52cdefg |
2 | 21.60 | 4.53 | 5.67 | 48.13 | 4 195.56cdefg | |
3 | 22.95 | 5.56 | 6.50 | 46.91 | 5 822.55abcd | |
4 | 21.90 | 5.13 | 4.79 | 43.39 | 3 756.96fg | |
5 | 22.95 | 6.65 | 5.96 | 47.11 | 6 242.92ab | |
6 | 21.90 | 6.34 | 5.85 | 47.41 | 5 929.75abc | |
7 | 22.80 | 4.93 | 6.45 | 46.36 | 5 052.83abcdef | |
8 | 23.10 | 5.40 | 5.59 | 43.85 | 4 467.71cdefg | |
9 | 23.10 | 6.20 | 5.24 | 43.85 | 4 599.47abcdefg | |
10 | 21.90 | 5.20 | 5.64 | 48.08 | 4 033.47efg | |
11 | 21.60 | 7.06 | 5.94 | 44.09 | 6 384.65a | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 23.10 | 4.40 | 5.47 | 42.58 | 3 786.77fg |
2 | 22.80 | 4.47 | 5.34 | 48.93 | 3 861.00fg | |
3 | 23.25 | 5.35 | 6.35 | 46.65 | 5 379.13abcdef | |
4 | 23.10 | 3.34 | 4.62 | 42.08 | 3 197.01g | |
5 | 22.80 | 5.13 | 5.94 | 46.48 | 3 924.56fg | |
6 | 22.80 | 5.62 | 5.67 | 46.33 | 5 324.68abcdef | |
7 | 23.25 | 3.95 | 6.43 | 46.26 | 4 652.52abcdefg | |
8 | 22.05 | 4.23 | 5.35 | 42.95 | 4 226.53defg | |
9 | 22.65 | 5.75 | 4.72 | 42.74 | 4 510.47bcdefg | |
10 | 22.35 | 4.18 | 5.12 | 47.57 | 3 930.36fg | |
11 | 22.65 | 6.00 | 5.67 | 44.55 | 5 587.43abcde |
表 6 水分胁迫下棉花产量及其构成因素变化
Table 6 Effects of water stress on the yield and yield components of cotton
处理 Treatments | 品种(系) Cotton varieties (strains) | 收获株数 Plant number (104株/hm2) | 有效铃数 Boll number per plant (个/株) | 单铃重 Single boll weight (g) | 衣分 Lint percentage (%) | 籽棉产量 Seed Cotton yield (kg/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
正常灌水 Normal irrigation | 1 | 21.45 | 5.17 | 5.60 | 43.37 | 4 328.52cdefg |
2 | 21.60 | 4.53 | 5.67 | 48.13 | 4 195.56cdefg | |
3 | 22.95 | 5.56 | 6.50 | 46.91 | 5 822.55abcd | |
4 | 21.90 | 5.13 | 4.79 | 43.39 | 3 756.96fg | |
5 | 22.95 | 6.65 | 5.96 | 47.11 | 6 242.92ab | |
6 | 21.90 | 6.34 | 5.85 | 47.41 | 5 929.75abc | |
7 | 22.80 | 4.93 | 6.45 | 46.36 | 5 052.83abcdef | |
8 | 23.10 | 5.40 | 5.59 | 43.85 | 4 467.71cdefg | |
9 | 23.10 | 6.20 | 5.24 | 43.85 | 4 599.47abcdefg | |
10 | 21.90 | 5.20 | 5.64 | 48.08 | 4 033.47efg | |
11 | 21.60 | 7.06 | 5.94 | 44.09 | 6 384.65a | |
水分胁迫 Water stress | 1 | 23.10 | 4.40 | 5.47 | 42.58 | 3 786.77fg |
2 | 22.80 | 4.47 | 5.34 | 48.93 | 3 861.00fg | |
3 | 23.25 | 5.35 | 6.35 | 46.65 | 5 379.13abcdef | |
4 | 23.10 | 3.34 | 4.62 | 42.08 | 3 197.01g | |
5 | 22.80 | 5.13 | 5.94 | 46.48 | 3 924.56fg | |
6 | 22.80 | 5.62 | 5.67 | 46.33 | 5 324.68abcdef | |
7 | 23.25 | 3.95 | 6.43 | 46.26 | 4 652.52abcdefg | |
8 | 22.05 | 4.23 | 5.35 | 42.95 | 4 226.53defg | |
9 | 22.65 | 5.75 | 4.72 | 42.74 | 4 510.47bcdefg | |
10 | 22.35 | 4.18 | 5.12 | 47.57 | 3 930.36fg | |
11 | 22.65 | 6.00 | 5.67 | 44.55 | 5 587.43abcde |
[1] | 何平如, 张富仓, 范军亮, 等. 土壤水分调控对南疆滴灌棉花生长、品质及水分利用的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2020, 38(4):39-46. |
HE Pingru, ZHANG Fucang, FAN Junliang, et al. Effects of soil moisture regulation on growth,quality and water use of cotton under drip irrigation in Southern Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2020, 38(4):39-46. | |
[2] | 孙丰磊, 张玻, 曲延英, 等. 花铃期干旱胁迫对不同棉花品种光合特性影响及抗旱性评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(5):7-13+20. |
SUN Fenglei, ZAHNG Bo, QU Yanying, et al. Effects of drought stress during the blooming period on photosynthetic characteristics and assessment drought resistance of different cotton varieties[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(5):7-13+20. | |
[3] |
FENG L, DAI J L, TIAN L W, et al. Review of the technology for high-yielding and efficient cotton cultivation in the northwest inland cotton-growing region of china[J]. Field Crops Research, 2017, 208: 18-26.
DOI URL |
[4] | 刘光辉, 陈全家, 吴鹏昊, 等. 棉花花铃期抗旱性综合评价及指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(1):53-62.69. |
LIU Guanghui, CHEN Quanjia, WU Penghao, et al. Screening and comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance indices of cotton at blossing and boll-forming stages[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2016, 17(1):53-62.69. | |
[5] | 李海明, 刘绍东, 张思平, 等. 陆地棉种质资源花铃期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱指标筛选[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(3):583-597. |
LI Haiming, LIU Shaodong, ZHANG Siping, et al. Identification and indices screening of drought tolerance at flowering and boll setting stage in upland cotton germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(3):583-597. | |
[6] | 杜传莉, 黄国勤. 棉花主要抗旱鉴定指标研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(9):17-20. |
DU Chuanli, HUANG Guoqin. Research progress of major identification indicators in the cotton drought-resistance[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(9): 17-20. | |
[7] | 南建福, 刘恩科, 王计平, 等. 苗期干旱和施肥对棉花生长发育的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2005, 17(6):339-342. |
NAN Jianfu, LIU Enke, WANG Jiping, et al. Effect of drought duration and fertilizer at seedling period on cotton development[J]. Cotton Science, 2005, 17(6):339-342. | |
[8] | 韩会玲, 康凤君. 水分胁迫对棉花生产影响的试验研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2001, 17(3):37-40. |
HAN Huiling, KANG Fengjun. Experiment and study on effect of moisture coerce on cotton producing[J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2001, 17(3):37-40. | |
[9] | 田又升, 王志军, 于航, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性棉花品种抗氧化酶活性及基因表达的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(12):2483-2490. |
TIAN Yousheng, WANG Zhijun, YU Hang, et al. Response of antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression in different drought resistance cotton varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(12): 2483-2490. | |
[10] | 冯春晓, 郝志军, 高健民, 等. 干旱胁迫下NaCl对棉花幼苗抗氧化酶活性及水分特征的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6):98-103. |
FENG Chunxiao, HAO Zhijun, GAO Jianmin, et al. Effect of NaCl on antioxidant enzyme activities and water status in cotton seedling under drought stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6): 98-103. | |
[11] | 万华龙, 刘朋程, 刘连涛, 等. 早期适度干旱对棉花产量、纤维品质及水分利用效率影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(6):464-472. |
WAN Hualong, LIU Pengcheng, LIU Liantao, et al. Effect of moderate drought in the early stage on cotton yield, fiber quality and water use efficiency[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(6): 464-472. | |
[12] | 李平, 张永江, 刘连涛, 等. 水分胁迫对棉花幼苗水分利用和光合特性的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(2):113-121. |
LI Ping, ZHANG Yongjiang, LIU Liantao, et al. Effects of water stress on water utilization and leaf photosynthetic characteristics in cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) seedlings[J]. Cotton Science, 2014, 26(2):113-121. | |
[13] | 田又升, 叶春秀, 张国丽, 等. 棉花蕾期至初花期抗旱性评价及指标筛选[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(2):306-312. |
TIAN Yousheng, YE Chunxiu, ZHANG Guoli, et al. Drought resistance evaluation and indexes screening of cotton during bud stage to flowering stage[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 31(2): 306-312. | |
[14] | 张宪政. 植物生理学实验技术[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁科技出版社, 1994: 89-98. |
ZHANG Xianzheng. Experimental techniques of plant physiology [M]. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and technology Publishing House, 1994:89-98. | |
[15] |
WANG Y, WU W H. Plant sensing and signaling in response to K-deficiency[J]. Molecular Plant, 2010, 3: 280-287.
DOI URL |
[16] |
CAKMAK I, MARSCHNER H. Magnesium deficiency and high light intensity activities of dismutase ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase in bean leaves[J]. Plant Physiology, 1992, 98: 1222-1227.
DOI URL |
[17] | 李志博, 林海荣, 魏亦农, 等. 北疆主栽棉花抗旱性生育期差异评价及鉴定体系的初步建立[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3):84-90. |
LI Zhibo, LIN Hairong, WEI Yinong, et al. Primary evaluation of drought resistance and construction of identification system of cotton at different growth stages in Northern Xinjiang[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(3): 84-90. | |
[18] | 戴茂华, 刘丽英, 庞昭进, 等. 花铃期干旱胁迫对棉花生理生化指标的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2015, 27(7):19-21. |
DAI Maohua, LIU Liying, PANG Zhaojin, et al. Effects of drought stress at flowering and boll-forming stages on physiological and biochemical indexes of cotton[J]. Acta Agricultural Jiangxi, 2015, 27(7): 19-21. | |
[19] | 雷成霞, 王振华, 魏闯, 等. 新疆地下滴灌无膜移栽棉花干物质积累与需水量关系[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2012, 31(6):94-97.102. |
LEI Chengxia, WANG Zhenhua, WEI Chuang, et al. relationship between dry matter accumulation and water requirement in cotton transplantation without film under subsurface drip irrigation in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2012, 31(6): 94-97.102. | |
[20] | 孙红春, 任新茂, 李存东, 等. 水分胁迫对棉花不同部位主茎叶14C同化、分配的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2011, 23(3):247-252. |
SUN Hongchun, REN Xinmao, LI Cundong, et al. Effects of water stress on assimilation and partitioning of 14C of different leaves on the main stem of cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2011, 23(3): 247-252. | |
[21] | 汪昌树, 杨鹏年, 姬亚琴, 等. 不同灌水下限对膜下滴灌棉花土壤水盐运移和产量的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(2) :232-238. |
WANG Changshu, YANG Pengnian, JI Yaqin, et al. Effects of different irrigation lower limits on soil water-salt transport and yield of cotton under mulched drip-irrigation[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(2): 232-238. | |
[22] | 申孝军, 张寄阳, 刘祖贵, 等. 膜下滴灌条件下不同水分处理对棉花产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2012, 30(2):118-124. |
SHEN Xiaojun, ZHANG Jiyang, LIU Zugui, et al. Effects of different water treatments on yield and water use efficiency of cotton with drip irrigation under film mulch[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(2): 232-238. | |
[23] |
WANG R S, KANG Y H, WANG S Q. Salt distribution and the growth of cotton under different drip irrigation regimes in a saline area[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2011, 100(1):58-69.
DOI URL |
[24] | 李忠旺, 陈玉梁, 罗俊杰, 等. 棉花抗旱品种筛选鉴定及抗旱性综合评价方法[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(1):240-247. |
LI Zhongwang, CHEN Yuliang, LUO Junjie, et al. Screening and evaluation for drought resistance of cotton varieties[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2017, 35(1): 240-247. | |
[25] | 刘素华, 彭延, 彭小峰, 等. 调亏灌溉与合理密植对旱区棉花生长发育及产量与品质的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(2):184-188. |
LIU Suhua, PENG Yan, PENG Xiaofeng, et al. Effects of Regulated Deficit Irrigation and Plant Density on Plant Growth and Yield and Fiber Quality of Cotton in Dry Land Area[J]. Cotton Science, 2016, 28(2): 184-188. | |
[26] | 刘郁娜, 陈飞虎, 胥新强, 等. 杏棉间作田间配置对棉花生长发育及棉铃时空分布的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2013, 25(1):37-44. |
LIU Yuna, CHEN Feihu, XU Xinqiang, et al. Effect of field arrangement in apricot-cotton intercropping on cotton plant growth and tempo-spatial distribution of boll[J]. Cotton Science, 2013, 25(1): 37-44. | |
[27] |
BANGE M P, MILROY S P. Growth and dry matter partitioning of diverse cotton genotypes[J]. Field Crop Research, 2004, 87(1):73-87.
DOI URL |
[28] | 刘朋程, 孙红春, 刘连涛, 等. 限量灌溉对不同棉花品种干物质积累分配、产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(4):316-325. |
LIU Pengcheng, SUN Hongchun, LIU Liaotao, et al. Effects of limited irrigation on accumulation and distribution of dry matter, yield, and water use efficiency of different cotton varieties[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(4): 316-325. | |
[29] |
PAPASTYLIANOU P T, ARGYROKASTRITIS I G. Effect of limited drip irrigation regime on yield, yield components, and fiber quality of cotton under Mediterranean conditions[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2014, 142:127-134.
DOI URL |
[30] | 姚青青, 杨涛, 马兴旺, 等. 水肥调控策略对膜下滴灌棉花冠层结构和产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2013, 25(1):73-80. |
YAO Qingqing, YANG Tao, MA Xingwang W, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer regulation strategies on cotton canopy structure and yield under mulch drip irrigation[J]. Cotton Science, 2013, 25(1): 73-80. | |
[31] |
ZHANG M, Jin Z Q, Zhao J, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses to drought stress in cultivated and Tibetan wild barley[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2015, 75(2): 567-574.
DOI URL |
[32] | 马文涛, 樊卫国. 贵州野生柑橘的抗旱性及其活性氧代谢对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 果树学报, 2014, 31(3): 394-400. |
MA Wentao, FAN Weiguo. Drought resistance and response of active oxygen metabolism of wild citrus seedlings of Guizhou under drought stress[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2014, 31(3): 394-400. | |
[33] | 王俊娟, 王帅, 陆许可, 等. 棉花幼苗对低温胁迫的响应及抗冷机制初步研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(2):147-156. |
WANG Junjuan, WANG Shuai, LU Xuke, et al. The Effect of Low Temperature Stress on the Growth of Upland Cotton Seedlings and a Preliminary Study of Cold-Resistance Mechanisms[J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29(2): 147-156. | |
[34] | 董合忠, 毛树春, 张旺锋, 等. 棉花优化成铃栽培理论及其新发展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(3):441-451. |
DONG Hezhong, MAO Shuchun, ZHANG Wangfeng, et al. On boll-setting optimization theory for cotton cultivation and its new development[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(3): 441-451. | |
[35] | 卢合全, 代建龙, 李振怀, 等. 出苗期遇雨对不同播种方式棉花出苗及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(1):60-70. |
LU Hequan, DAI Jianlong, LI Zhenhuai, et al. Effects of rainfall at emergence on stand establishment and yield of cotton under different seeding patterns[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018, 51(1): 60-70. | |
[36] | 蔡红涛, 汤一卒, 刁品春, 等. 棉花花铃期土壤持续干旱胁迫对产量形成的调节效应[J]. 棉花学报, 2008, 20(4):300-305. |
CAI Hongtao T, TANG Yizu, DIAO Pinchun, et al. Regulation effect of soil progressive drought on yield of cotton during blooming and bolling periods[J]. Cotton Science, 2008, 20(4): 300-305. |
[1] | 王朋, 郑凯, 赵杰银, 高文举, 龙遗磊, 陈全家, 曲延英. 陆地棉种质资源材料的耐热性评价及指标筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090. |
[2] | 刘海军, 张昊, 王一帆, 陈茂光, 吴凤全, 林涛, 汤秋香. 不同覆盖材料和灌溉量对机采棉产量形成及有效积温生产效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[3] | 陈茂光, 林涛, 张昊, 刘海军, 王一帆, 汤秋香. 地膜类型对棉花生长的影响及自身降解和回收特性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2101-2108. |
[4] | 王辉, 郭金成, 宋佳, 张庭军, 何良荣. 高温胁迫下陆地棉GhCIPK6转基因后代生理生化分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2109-2119. |
[5] | 杨国江, 陈云, 林祥群, 何江勇, 刘盛林, 曲永清. 氮肥减施下有机肥替代对滴灌棉花产量、氮素吸收利用及土壤硝态氮的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2138-2145. |
[6] | 陈传信, 张永强, 聂石辉, 孔德鹏, 赛力汗·赛, 徐其江, 雷钧杰. 生物质炭施用量对滴灌冬小麦生长发育和产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[7] | 王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162. |
[8] | 王晓雨, 王小平, 史文宇, 刘美艳, 马健, 郭云鹏, 宋瑞欣, 王清涛. 拔节期冬小麦光合特性、干物质积累和产量对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[9] | 向莉, 王仙, 董裕生, 郭小玲, 方伏荣, 陈智军, 马艳明, 苗雨. 外源丁酸对干旱胁迫下大麦产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2173-2181. |
[10] | 杨红梅, 张跃强, 史应武, 吾买尔江·库尔班, 林青, 王宁, 楚敏, 曾军. 不同类型叶面肥喷施对冬小麦籽粒产量和品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[11] | 马明杰, 赵经华, 李冬民, 杨胜春, 王克贤, 李池. 不同灌溉方式对苜蓿土壤水分与灌溉水利用效率的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2306-2313. |
[12] | 王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829. |
[13] | 马青山, 杜霄, 陶志鑫, 韩万里, 龙遗磊, 艾先涛, 胡守林. 陆地棉种质材料机采农艺性状鉴定分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1830-1839. |
[14] | 董艳雪, 贾永红, 张金汕, 李丹丹, 王凯, 罗四维, 王润琪, 石书兵. 不同生态区环境下春小麦干物质积累及产量形成分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[15] | 李怀胜, 艾洪玉, 孟玲, 王贺亚, 张磊, 艾海峰. 减氮下运筹养分吸收高峰期追施比例对春小麦的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||