Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.001

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (8): 1821-1829.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.08.001

• Crop Genetics and Breeding · Germplasm Resources · Molecular Genetics · Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton

WANG Xin¹^,²(), LIN Tao¹^,³(), CUI Jianping¹, WU Fengquan², TANG Zhixuan², CUI Laiyuan², GUO Rensong¹, WANG Liang¹, ZHENG Zipiao¹

1. Institute of Economic Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091, China
2. Cotton Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education / College of Agronomy,Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
3. Key Laboratory of Physiological Ecology and Cultivation of Desert Oasis Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Urumqi 830091, China

Received:2022-12-01 Online:2023-08-20 Published:2023-08-14
Correspondence author: LIN Tao (1981-), male, Doctor, Associate Research Fellow.Research direction: physiological and ecological study of cotton field, (E-mail)27427732@qq.com
Supported by:
National Key Research and Development Program of China(2020YFD1001005);Key Cultivation Program of Science and Technology Innovation of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjnky-2020003);Independent cultivation project of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences(xjnkyzzp-2022002);Agricultural S & T innovation platform ability construction project of Xinjiang academy of agricultural science / key laboratory of crop physiology, ecology and farming in desert oasis open project of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs(25107020-202001);Talent cultivation project Tianshan mountain of Xinjiang jointly funded

种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响

王心¹^,²(), 林涛¹^,³(), 崔建平¹, 吴凤全², 唐志轩², 崔来园², 郭仁松¹, 王亮¹, 郑子漂¹

1.新疆农业科学院经济作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
2.新疆农业大学农学院/棉花教育部工程研究中心, 乌鲁木齐 830052
3.农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室,乌鲁木齐 830091

通讯作者: 林涛(1981-),男,新疆玛纳斯人,博士,研究员,研究方向为棉田生理生态,(E-mail)27427732@qq.com
作者简介:王心(1998-),女,吉林辽源人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业资源高效利用,(E-mail)1677404357@qq.com
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFD1001005);新疆农业科学院科技创新重点培育项目(xjnky-2020003);新疆农业科学院自主培育专项(xjnkyzzp-2022002);新疆农业科学院农业科技创新平台能力提升建设专项-农业农村部荒漠绿洲作物生理生态与耕作重点实验室开放课题(25107020-202001);新疆维吾尔自治区天山英才人才培养项目

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton and provide a theoretical basis for improving the quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton.【Methods】 This study adopted a split-plot experimental design.Under the same planting density, three planting patterns were set: one film with three rows (S₃), one film with four rows (S₄), and one film with six rows (S₆).The three irrigation quotas were: 3,150 m³/hm² [W₁, severe deficit (field capacity 50%)], 4,050 m³/hm² [W₂, mild deficit (field capacity 75%)] and 4,980 m³/hm² [ W₃, slight deficit (field capacity 100%)].【Results】 Under different row spacing and irrigation quota, the accumulation of cotton dry matter conformed to the logistic growth function model.Under the same irrigation quota, with the expansion of the average row spacing, it enter the period of rapid dry matter accumulation earlier and increase Vm.The average Vm of S₃ treatment 0.62 and 0.77 g/(plant·d) higher than that of S₄ and S₆ treatments, respectively.Under the same planting mode, with the increase of irrigation quota, the dry matter accumulation rate faster and the rapid accumulation period longer.The increase of average row spacing and irrigation quota significantly improved the number of bolls per plant and the quality of bolls, and finally increased the yield.There was no significant difference between W₂ and W₃ treatments.In terms of defoliation and branch hanging, under the same irrigation quota, with the expansion of the average row spacing, the defoliation rate of long-staple cotton was significantly increased, and the hanging branch rate was significantly reduced; under the same planting mode, with the increase of irrigation quota, oth leaf rate and branch hanging rate were significantly increased.In the interaction between the production and fiber quality, the defoliation rate of S₃W₃ treatment was the highest, and the branch hanging rate of S₃W₁ treatment was the lowest.In terms of fiber quality, the half-average length, uniformity and textile parameters increased with the increase of the average row spacing; the effect of irrigation quota on fiber quality was not significant, but the W₁ treatment showed better fiber quality.【Conclusion】 The combination of equal row spacing and mild deficit irrigation (S₃W₂) is beneficial to the transfer of dry matter accumulation to reproductive organs, and the number of bolls per plant and the weight of single bolls are significantly increased, which is different from the seed cotton yield under the full irrigation treatment.And the defoliation rate is higher, the leaf hanging rate is lower, and the fiber quality is better.

Key words: planting pattern; irrigation quota; machine-picked long-staple cotton; yield; fiber quality

摘要：

【目的】研究种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响,为促进机采长绒棉产量与品质协同提供理论依据。【方法】试验在田间微区控制条件下进行,采用裂区试验设计,选择同一最适密度,以机采种植模式为主区:1膜3行(S₃)、1膜4行(S₄)和1膜6行(S₆);灌溉定额为副区:3 150 m³/hm²[W₁,重度亏缺(田间持水量50%)]、4 050 m³/hm²[ W₂,轻度亏缺(田间持水量75%)]和4 980 m³/hm²[ W₃,充分灌溉(田间持水量100%)],分析种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉干物质积累、产量构成及机采品质的影响。【结果】棉花干物质的积累符合 Logistic 生长函数模型。同一灌溉定额下,随平均行距的扩大可提早进入干物质快速积累时期,S₃处理最大干物质积累速率平均分别比S₄和S₆处理增加0.62和0.77 g/(株·d)。在同一种植模式下,干物质积累速度和持续时长随着灌溉定额的增加而增加。平均行距和灌溉定额的增加,显著提高了单株结铃数与单铃质量及产量。同一灌溉定额下,随平均行距的扩大,化学脱叶效率显著提高,挂枝率显著降低,棉纤维半均长、整齐度和纺织参数得到显著改善;同一种植模式下,随着灌溉定额的增加,产量与纤维品质指标同样显著提高,但对纤维品质的影响未达到显著水平。【结论】等行距处理和轻度亏缺灌溉组合(S₃W₂),有利于干物质积累量向生殖器官的转移,单株结铃数和单铃重显著提高,且机采品质较好。

关键词: 种植模式, 灌溉定额, 机采长绒棉, 产量, 机采品质

CLC Number:

S233.75
S562

WANG Xin, LIN Tao, CUI Jianping, WU Fengquan, TANG Zhixuan, CUI Laiyuan, GUO Rensong, WANG Liang, ZHENG Zipiao. Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.

王心, 林涛, 崔建平, 吴凤全, 唐志轩, 崔来园, 郭仁松, 王亮, 郑子漂. 种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(8): 1821-1829.

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

[1]	姚贺盛, 张亚黎, 易小平, 等. 海岛棉和陆地棉叶片光合特性、冠层结构及物质生产的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(2): 251-261. DOI
	YAO Hesheng, ZHANG Yali, YI Xiaoping, et al. Study onDifferences in Comparative Canopy Structure Characteristics and Photosynthetic Carbon Assimilation of Field-grown Pima Cottonand Upland Cotton[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(2): 251-261. DOI
[2]	李建峰, 梁福斌, 陈厚川, 等. 棉花机采模式下株行距配置对农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(8): 1390-1396.
	LI Jianfeng, LIANG Fubin, CHEN Houchuan, et al. Effects of row spacing on agronomic traits and yield of cotton under mechanical picking mode[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(8): 1390-1396.
[3]	孙巍, 杨宝玲, 高振江, 等. 浅析我国棉花机械采收现状及制约因素[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2013, 34(6): 9-13.
	SUN Wei, YANG Baoling, GAO Zhenjiang, et al. Analysis of the current situation and restrictive factors of cotton mechanical harvesting in my country[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Machinery, 2013, 34(6): 9-13.
[4]	梁亚军, 王俊铎, 郑巨云, 等. 不同机采棉配置生长发育动态及产量的比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科技, 2017,(4): 26-27.
	LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, ZHENG Juyun, et al. Comparative analysis of growth dynamics and yield of different machine-picked cotton configurations[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017,(4): 26-27.
[5]	李建峰. 机采模式下株行距配置对棉花冠层特征及成铃特性的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2016.
	LI Jianfeng. Effects of plant row spacing on cotton canopy characteristics and boll formation characteristics under machine picking mode[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2016
[6]	尔晨, 林涛, 张昊, 等. 行距对机采棉干物质积累及氮磷利用效率的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2020, 32(1): 77-90.
	ER Chen, LIN Tao, ZHANG Hao, et al. Effects of row spacing on dry matter accumulation and nitrogen and phosphorus use efficiency of machine-picked cotton[J]. Cotton Science, 2020, 32(1): 77-90.
[7]	杨北方, 杨国正, 冯璐, 等. 亏缺灌溉对棉花生长和水分利用效率的影响研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(3): 1112-1118. DOI
	YANG Beifang, YANG Guozheng, FENG Lu, et al. Research progress on the effects of deficit irrigation on cotton growth and water use efficiency[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2021, 32(3): 1112-1118. DOI
[8]	张丹, 罗智, 刘帅, 等. 降低灌溉和密度对棉花生长、产量和纤维品质的影响[J]. 大田作物研究, 2016, (197): 1-9.
	ZHANG Dan, LUO Zhi, LIU Shuai, et al. Effects of deficit irrigation and plant density on the growth, yield and fiber quality of irrigated cotton[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, (197): 1-9.
[9]	薛晓萍, 王建国, 郭文琦, 等. 氮素水平对初花后棉株生物量, 氮素累积特征及氮素利用率动态变化的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(11): 3631-3640.
	XUE Xiaoping, WANG Jianguo, GUO Wenqi, et al. Effects of nitrogen levels on biomass, nitrogen accumulation characteristics and dynamic changes of nitrogen use efficiency in cotton plants after first flowering[J]. 2006, 26(11): 3631-3640.
[10]	魏鑫. 种植模式对机采棉花产量形成及采收效果的影响[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2017.
	WEi Xin. Effects of Planting Mode on Yield and Harvesting Effect of Machine-picked Cotton[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2017.
[11]	李健伟, 吴鹏昊, 石洪亮, 等. 不同机采棉种植模式对棉花主要植株形态影响效应分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(5): 82-87.
	LI Jianwei, WU Penghao, SHI Hongliang, et al. Analysis on the effect of different machine-picked cotton planting modes on the main plant morphology of cotton[J]. Agricultural Research in Arid Areas, 2018, 36(5): 82-87.
[12]	李健伟, 杨培, 张巨松, 等. 机采棉株行距配置对棉花生物量和氮素累积分配及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2018, 55(8): 1406-1416.
	LI Jianwei, YANG Pei, ZHANG Jusong, et al. Effects of machine-picked cotton plant row spacing configuration on cotton biomass and nitrogen accumulation, distribution and yield[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2018, 55(8): 1406-1416.
[13]	张昊, 林涛, 尔晨, 等. 配置模式对南疆机采棉生长发育及产量形成的调控效应[J]. 新疆农业大学学报, 2018, 41(5): 307-313.
	ZHANG Hao, LIN Tao, ER Chen, et al. Regulation effect of allocation mode on growth, development and yield formation of machine-picked cotton in southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2018, 41(5): 307-313.
[14]	杜刚锋, 汪江涛, 孙雪冰, 等. 不同灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层叶铃配置的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2019, 56(7): 1177-1186. DOI
	DU Gangfeng, WANG Jiangtao, SUN Xuebing, et al. Effects of Different Irrigation Modes and Irrigation Rates on Cotton Canopy Leaf Boll Configuration[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2019, 56(7): 1177-1186.
[15]	杜刚锋. 灌溉方式和灌水量对棉花冠层结构指标及群体光合生产力的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019.
	DU Gangfeng. Effects of irrigation method and amount on cotton canopy structure index and population photosynthetic productivity[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019.
[16]	牛玉萍, 罗宏海, 陈宗奎, 等. 有限灌溉下种植密度对棉花群体光合作用, 冠层结构及产量的影响[C]. 中国作物学会——2015 年学术年会论文摘要集,2015.
	NIU Yuping, LUO Honghai, CHEN Zongkui, et al. Effects of Planting Density on Photosynthesis, Canopy Structure and Yield of Cotton Population under Limited Irrigation[C]. Chinese Crop Society — 2015 Academic Annual Conference Abstract Collection,2015.
[17]	汪江涛. 新疆棉花不同灌溉方式对产量形成及水分利用效率的影响[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2020.
	WANG Jiangtao. Effects of different irrigation methods on cotton yield and water use efficiency in Xinjiang[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2020.
[18]	王秀媛, 马卉, 高宏云, 等. 新疆北部棉花冠层结构特征对滴灌定额的响应.[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4169-4176. DOI
	WANG Xiuyuan, MA Hui, GAO Hongyun, et al. Response of cotton canopy structure characteristics in northern Xinjiang to drip irrigation quota.[J]. Yingyong Shengtai Xuebao, 2019, 30(12): 4169-4176.
[19]	刘朋程, 孙红春, 刘连涛, 等. 限量灌溉对不同棉花品种干物质积累分配, 产量和水分利用效率的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2018, 30(4): 316-325.
	LIU Pengcheng, SUN Hongchun, LIU Liantao, et al. Effects of limited irrigation on dry matter accumulation, distribution, yield and water use efficiency of different cotton varieties[J]. Cotton Science, 2018, 30(4): 316-325.
[20]	刘素华, 彭延, 彭小峰, 等. 调亏灌溉与合理密植对旱区棉花生长发育及产量与品质的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2016, 28(2): 184-188.
	LIU Suhua, PENG Yan, PENG Xiaofeng, et al. Effects of Adjusted Deficit Irrigation and Reasonable Close Planting on Cotton Growth, Yield and Quality in Arid Areas[J]. Cotton Scienc, 2016, 28(2): 184-188.
[21]	郭景红, 赵海, 姚炎帝, 等. 机采棉不同种植模式对北疆棉花主要农艺性状、产量和品质影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(2): 20-23.
	GUO Jinghong, ZHAO Hai, YAO Yandi, et al. Effects of different planting modes of machine-picked cotton on main agronomic traits, yield and quality of cotton in northern Xinjiang[J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(2): 20-23.
[22]	罗忠, 刘宏, 李伟, 等. 减量施氮对棉花产量和氮素利用效率的影响[J]. 大田作物研究. 2018, 218: 150-157.
	LUO Zhong, LIU Hong, LI Wei, et al. Effects of reduced nitrogen rate on cotton yield and nitrogen use efficiency as mediated by application mode or plant density[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 218: 150-157. DOI URL
[23]	白岩, 毛树春, 田立文, 等. 新疆棉花高产简化栽培技术评述与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(1): 38-50. DOI
	BAI Yan, MAO Shuchun, TIAN Liwen, et al. Review and prospect of high-yield and simplified cotton cultivation techniques in Xinjiang[J]. China Agricultural Science, 2017, 50(1): 38-50.
[24]	王锋, 韩浩, 韩林, 等. 不同种植模式对棉花产量和品质的影响[J]. 农业科学学报. 2019, 18(9): 2019-2028.
	WANG Feng, HAN Hao, HAI Lin, et al. Effects of planting patterns on yield, quality, and defoliation in machine-harvested [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2019, 18(9): 2019-2028. DOI URL
[25]	李建峰, 王聪, 梁福斌, 等. 新疆机采模式下棉花株行距配置对冠层结构指标及产量的影响[J]. 棉花学报, 2017, 29(2): 157-165.
	LI Jianfeng, WANG Cong, LIANG Fubin, et al. Effects of cotton row spacing configuration on canopy structure and yield under machine-harvesting mode in Xinjiang [J]. Cotton Science, 2017, 29,(2): 157-165.
[26]	王聪. 棉花机采模式下行距变化对植株生长发育和产量形成的影响[D]. 石河子:石河子大学, 2015.
	WANG Cong. The effect of the variation of descending distance of cotton mechanical picking mode on plant growth and yield[D]. Shihezi:Shihezi University, 2015.
[27]	王刚, 刘辉, 樊庆鲁, 等. 新疆兵团机采棉脱叶剂应用状况分析[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2012,(7): 40-42.
	WANG Gang, LIU Hui, FAN Qinglu, et al. Analysis on the application of defoliants for machine-picked cotton in Xinjiang Corps [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2012,(7): 40-42.
[28]	李建峰, 梁福斌, 陈厚川, 等. 棉花机采模式下株行距配置对农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(8): 1390-1396.
	LI Jianfeng, LIANG Fubin, CHEN Houchuan, et al. Effects of row spacing configuration on agronomic traits and yield under machine-picking mode of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Science, 2016, 53(8): 1390-1396.
[29]	桑晓慧, 陈伟, 赵云雷, 等. 不同种植模式对棉花产量及纤维品质的影响[J]. 中国棉花, 2021, 48(9): 21-24.
	SANG Xiaohui, CHEN Wei, ZHAO Yunlei, et al. Effects of different planting patterns on cotton yield and fiber quality [J]. China Cotton, 2021, 48(9): 21-24.
[30]	张文, 刘铨义, 曾庆涛, 等. 不同株行距配置对机采棉成铃特性及纤维品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021(2): 147-152.
	ZHANG Wen, LIU Quanyi, ZENG Qingtao, et al. Effects of different plant row spacing on boll-forming characteristics and fiber quality of machine-picked cotton [J]. Crop, 2021(2): 147-152.
[31]	胡群, 马建江, 何建华. 不同株行距配置对棉花生长及纤维品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2016, 39(8): 6-7.
	HU Qun, MA Jianjiang, HE Jianhua. Effects of different plant row spacing on cotton growth and fiber quality[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2016, 39(8): 6-7.

种植模式 Planting patterns	灌溉定额 Irrigation quotas	R²	V_m g/(plant·d)	T(d)	t₁(d)	t₂(d)	Δt(d)	GT (g/plant)
S₃	W₁	0.999 7	2.12	99.86	66.92	123.02	40.62	97.99
	W₂	0.998 8	2.78	90.49	76.7	110.8	40.19	113.01
	W₃	0.997 5	2.89	87.02	70.18	107.12	46.32	116.31
S₄	W₁	0.993 6	1.59	88.99	65.51	112.46	42.55	74.7
	W₂	0.996	2.14	87.41	66.14	108.69	46.95	90.99
	W₃	0.994 6	2.21	88.64	65.84	111.43	45.59	100.91
S₆	W₁	0.997 3	1.74	90.74	68.43	113.05	44.62	77.79
	W₂	0.990 5	1.82	94.92	68.32	121.52	54.32	96.96
	W₃	0.988 6	1.92	94.79	67.63	121.94	53.2	104.35

种植模式 Planting patterns	灌溉定额 Irrigation quotas	R²	V_m g/(plant·d)	T(d)	t₁(d)	t₂(d)	Δt(d)	GT (g/plant)
S₃	W₁	0.999 7	2.12	99.86	66.92	123.02	40.62	97.99
	W₂	0.998 8	2.78	90.49	76.7	110.8	40.19	113.01
	W₃	0.997 5	2.89	87.02	70.18	107.12	46.32	116.31
S₄	W₁	0.993 6	1.59	88.99	65.51	112.46	42.55	74.7
	W₂	0.996	2.14	87.41	66.14	108.69	46.95	90.99
	W₃	0.994 6	2.21	88.64	65.84	111.43	45.59	100.91
S₆	W₁	0.997 3	1.74	90.74	68.43	113.05	44.62	77.79
	W₂	0.990 5	1.82	94.92	68.32	121.52	54.32	96.96
	W₃	0.988 6	1.92	94.79	67.63	121.94	53.2	104.35

种植模式 Planting patterns	灌溉定额 Irrigation quotas	单株铃数 Boll number per plant	棉铃质量 Cotton boll weight(g)	衣分 Lint percentage(%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield(kg/hm²)
S₃	W₁	7.07^a	3.17^a	32.66^a	4 311.16^d
	W₂	7.34^a	2.88^c	33.55^a	5 099.49^ab
	W₃	6.94^a	2.91^bc	32.93^a	5 244.75^a
S₄	W₁	6.49^a	3.09^ab	33.38^a	3 640.95^f
	W₂	6.42^a	3.04^ab	33.55^a	4 644.27^c
	W₃	6.59^a	2.98^bc	33.28^a	4 581.72^cd
S₆	W₁	6.27^a	2.86^c	33.78^a	4 026.71^de
	W₂	6.67^a	3.11^a	33.17^a	4 359.42^d
	W₃	6.66^a	2.99^bc	33.59^a	4 905.99^b
两因素分析Two-way ANOVA(Fvalue)
种植模式Planting patterns(S)		NS	NS	NS	^*
灌溉定额Irrigation quotas (W)		NS	^**	NS	^**
种植模式×灌溉定额(S×W) Planting patterns×Irrigation quotas		NS	^*	NS	^**

种植模式 Planting patterns	灌溉定额 Irrigation quotas	单株铃数 Boll number per plant	棉铃质量 Cotton boll weight(g)	衣分 Lint percentage(%)	籽棉产量 Seed cotton yield(kg/hm²)
S₃	W₁	7.07^a	3.17^a	32.66^a	4 311.16^d
	W₂	7.34^a	2.88^c	33.55^a	5 099.49^ab
	W₃	6.94^a	2.91^bc	32.93^a	5 244.75^a
S₄	W₁	6.49^a	3.09^ab	33.38^a	3 640.95^f
	W₂	6.42^a	3.04^ab	33.55^a	4 644.27^c
	W₃	6.59^a	2.98^bc	33.28^a	4 581.72^cd
S₆	W₁	6.27^a	2.86^c	33.78^a	4 026.71^de
	W₂	6.67^a	3.11^a	33.17^a	4 359.42^d
	W₃	6.66^a	2.99^bc	33.59^a	4 905.99^b
两因素分析Two-way ANOVA(Fvalue)
种植模式Planting patterns(S)		NS	NS	NS	^*
灌溉定额Irrigation quotas (W)		NS	^**	NS	^**
种植模式×灌溉定额(S×W) Planting patterns×Irrigation quotas		NS	^*	NS	^**

种植模式 Planting patterns	灌溉定额 Irrigation quotas	上半均长 Upper halfaverage	整齐度 Uniformity	比强度 Specific strength(CN/tex)	伸长率 Elongation	马克隆值 Micronaire	纺织参数 Textilepa rameter
S₃	W₁	40.22^a	89.11^a	46.70^a	9.66^c	4.46^a	223.83^a
	W₂	39.09^bc	88.10^bc	45.03^bc	9.87^bc	4.63^a	211.17^b
	W₃	39.69^ab	88.62^ab	45.49^abc	10.33^a	4.69^a	215.09^b
S₄	W₁	39.20^bc	88.00^bc	44.68^bc	9.86^bc	4.48^a	211.67^b
	W₂	39.37^bc	88.04^bc	45.67^ab	9.78^bc	4.64^a	215.82^b
	W₃	38.97^c	88.19^bc	43.90^c	10.07^ab	4.55^a	209.70^b
S₆	W₁	37.85^d	87.77^c	44.97^bc	10.06^ab	4.50^a	212.33^b
	W₂	39.03^bc	88.28^bc	45.03^bc	10.08^ab	4.54^a	213.17^b
	W₃	38.86^c	87.96^c	44.78^bc	10.13^ab	4.59^a	212.14^b
两因素分析Two-way ANOVA(Fvalue)
种植模式Planting patterns(S)		^**	^**	^*	NS	NS	^*
灌溉定额Irrigation quotas (W)		NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS
种植模式×灌溉定额(S×W) Planting patterns×Irrigation quotas		^**	^**	NS	^*	NS	NS

Effects of planting mode and irrigation quota on yield and fiber quality of machine-picked long-staple cotton

种植模式与灌溉定额对机采长绒棉产量及纤维品质形成的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

[1]	LI Junhua, MAO Jiancai, YANG Junyan, WANG Haojie. Analysis of the Current Situation of the Jiashi Melon Industry and discussion of Development Countermeasures [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 101-105.
[2]	GONG Xuehua, WANG Xiaowu, FU Kaiyun, JIA Zunzun, TURSUN Ahmat, QIAO Xiaoyan, YE Xiaoqin, GUO Wenchao, DING Xinhua. Effects of weed seeds bank and environmental factors on weed seeds germination in oasis irrigation areas of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 49-59.
[3]	FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80.
[4]	ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[5]	CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[6]	HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[7]	ZHANG Tingjun, LI Zihui, CUI Yujiang, SUN Xiaogui, CHEN Fang. Effects of microbial agents on cotton growth and soil physico-chemical properties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2269-2276.
[8]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[9]	ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[10]	HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of organic and inorganic combined application on yield, soil nutrients and enzyme activities of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.
[11]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860.
[12]	YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871.
[13]	NIU Tingting, MA Mingsheng, ZHANG Jungao. Effects of straw returning and plastic film mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and spring maize yield in rain-fed upland farmland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906.
[14]	ZHAO Minhua, SONG Bingxi, ZHANG Yupeng, GAO Zhihong, ZHU Yongyong, CHEN Xiaoyuan. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen partial factor productivity under dry farming conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915.
[15]	ZHANG Caihong, WANG Guoqiang, JIANG Luyan, LIU Tao, DE Xianming. Variation of environmental factors and analysis of tomato traits in low-energy assembly-type deep-winter production solar greenhouse [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 2043-2053.