Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.019

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (4): 943-950.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.04.019

• Horticultural Special Local Products·Forestry·Facility Agriculture • Previous Articles Next Articles

Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants

DU Hongyan¹^,²(), PANG Shengqun¹(), MA Haixiang¹, JI Xuehua¹

1. Key Laboratory of Characteristic Fruits and Vegetables Cultivation Physiology and Germplasm Resources Utilization of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps/College of Agronomy,Shihezi University,Shihezi Xinjiang 832003,China
2. Hami Forest and Fruit Industry Technology Extension Center,Hami Xinjiang 839000,China

Received:2022-07-06 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-05-06
Correspondence author: PANG Shengqun(1970-), female, associate professor, master tutor, research direction: vegetable breeding, (E-mail)pangshqok@shzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
“Ethyl methyl sulfonate (EMS) mutagenesis Germplasm Resource innovation of Tomato”(2014AB004);University-level project“Breeding of new varieties of processed tomato with high red pigment ”(YZZX201801)

加工番茄早熟突变体农艺性状相关性及通径分析

杜红艳¹^,²(), 庞胜群¹(), 马海翔¹, 吉雪花¹

1.石河子大学农学院特色果蔬生理与种质资源利用兵团重点实验室,新疆石河子 832000
2.哈密市林果业技术推广中心,新疆哈密 839000

通讯作者: 庞胜群(1970-),女,安徽箫县人,副教授,硕士生导师,研究方向为蔬菜育种,(E-mail)pangshqok@shzu.edu.cn
作者简介:杜红艳(1994-),女,新疆石河子,硕士研究生,研究方向为园艺学,(E-mail)2419309914@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团科技支疆计划项目“甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS)诱变加工番茄突变体及种质资源创新”(2014AB004);校级项目“加工番茄高红色素新品种选育”(YZZX201801)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To determine the direct, indirect and determination coefficients of the main agronomic traits of processing tomato early-maturing mutants on early yield traits, and to provide a theoretical basis for the selection and breeding of excellent early-maturing tomato varieties. 【Methods】Correlation, regression and path analysis were performed on 11 main agronomic traits of 4 processing tomato early-maturing mutants. The larger the single fruit weight, the more the number of the first and the second ears, the higher the early yield; the earlier the budding period, the early flowering period, and the shorter the number of days from flowering to maturity, the higher the premature index. 【Results】The coefficients of variation of plant height, first flower node position, fruit transverse diameter, fruit longitudinal diameter, single fruit weight and number of the first and second ears were relatively large, which were 18.1%, 12.1%, 12.9%, 13.9%, 29.1% and 22.7%, respectively, showing that there was strong selectivity and was not difficult to be increased or improved to a large extent through breeding and cultivation. The results of correlation and variability analysis showed that the weight of a single fruit in the control group was significantly positively correlated with the previous yield, with a correlation coefficient of 0.892; the number of the first or the second ears was significantly positively correlated with the previous yield, with a correlation coefficient of 0.822; the weight of a single fruit in the treatment group, the number of the first and second ears were significantly positively correlated with the previous yield, the correlation coefficients were 0.770 and 0.958; The path analysis showed that the direct effect of single fruit weight and one and two ears results was positive on the early yield. The coefficient was a very significant positive correlation. In the selection of early maturity varieties of processing tomato, the selection should be built on the direct and indirect effects of the weight of single fruit and the number of the first and second ears. Among them, the number of the first and second ears was the decisive factor. 【Conclusion】In the process of breeding early maturity varieties of processing tomato, it is necessary to increase the early maturity index and the early yield, mainly considering the agronomic traits such as single fruit weight, number of the first and second ears, budding period, initial flowering period, and flowering to maturity days, focusing on the agronomic traits such as number of ears and fruit and weight of single fruit.

Key words: processing tomato; early-maturing mutants; agronomic traits; correlation analysis; path analysis

摘要：

【目的】研究加工番茄早熟突变体主要农艺性状对前期产量性状的直接作用、间接作用和决定系数,为加工番茄优良早熟品种的选育提供理论依据。【方法】对4份加工番茄早熟突变体的 11个主要农艺性状进行相关性、回归及通径分析。【结果】株高、始花节位、果实横径、果实纵径、单果重和一二穗结果数的变异系数较大,分别为 18.1%、12.1 %、12.9 %、13.9%、29.1%和22.7%,其可选择性较强,易于通过育种、栽培等方式得到较大程度的提高和改善。对照组单果重与前期产量呈极显著正相关,相关系数为0.892^**;一二穗结果数与前期产量呈显著性正相关,相关系数为0.822^*;处理组单果重和一二穗结果数与前期产量均呈极显著性正相关,相关系数为0.770^**和0.958^**;单果重越大、一二穗结果数越多、前期产量越高;现蕾期、始花期越早、开花至成熟天数越短,早熟性指数越高。单果重、一二穗结果数对前期产量的直接作用为正向,且相关系数为极显著正相关,在加工番茄早熟品种选育时,应结合单果重和一二穗果数2因素直接、间接作用进行选择,其中一二穗结果数起决定性因素。【结论】在加工番茄早熟品种选育过程中,要提高早熟性指数和前期产量,考虑单果重、一二穗结果数、现蕾期、始花期、开花至成熟天数等农艺性状,着重考虑一二穗结果数和单果重等农艺性状。

关键词: 加工番茄, 早熟突变体, 农艺性状, 相关性分析, 通径分析

CLC Number:

S641.2

DU Hongyan, PANG Shengqun, MA Haixiang, JI Xuehua. Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 943-950.

杜红艳, 庞胜群, 马海翔, 吉雪花. 加工番茄早熟突变体农艺性状相关性及通径分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(4): 943-950.

Figures/Tables 8

References 27

[1]	徐鹤林, 李景富. 中国番茄[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
	XU Helin, LI Jingfu. China Tomato[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.
[2]	单淑玲. 加工番茄花药培养愈伤组织诱导和分化研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019.
	SHAN Shu Ling. Study on Induction and Differentiation of Processed Tomato Anther Culture Callus[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019.
[3]	李凯, 谭丹. 新疆番茄产业国际竞争力分析[J]. 现代商业, 2018,(35):65-68.
	LI Kai, TAN Dan. Analysis on the International Competitiveness of Xinjiang Tomato Industry[J]. Modern Business, 2018,(35):65-68.
[4]	刘晓坤. 多目标加工番茄种植规划研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆大学, 2019.
	LIU Xiaokun. Research on Planting Planning of Multi-Object Processing Tomato[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang University, 2019.
[5]	刘超. 新疆番茄加工产业的现状及发展前景分析[J]. 现代食品, 2018,(13):4-5, 9.
	LIU Chao. Analysis of the status quo and development prospects of Xinjiang tomato processing industry[J]. Modern Food, 2018,(13):4-5, 9.
[6]	李守明, 王建江, 王诚军, 等. 2013. 我国加工番茄产业发展中的技术瓶颈与对策[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2013,(7):6-8.
	LI Shouming, WANG Jianjiang, WANG Chengjun, et al. Technical bottlenecks and countermeasures in the development of my country's processing tomato industry[J]. China Vegetables, 2013,(7): 6-8.
[7]	李荣霞, 刘伟, 张爱萍. 早熟加工番茄新品种新番72号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2017,(1):66-68.
	LI Rongxia, LIU Wei, ZHANG Aiping. The breeding of a new early-maturing tomato variety Xinfan 72[J]. China Vegetables, 2017,(1):66-68.
[8]	洪伟, 马野平, 张军, 等. 早熟加工番茄新品种新番71号的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2016,(12):72-74.
	HONG Wei, MA Yeping, ZHANG Jun, et al. The breeding of a new early-maturing tomato variety Xinfan 71[J]. China Vegetables, 2016,(12):72-74.
[9]	刘磊, 李君明, 郑峥, 等. 早熟加工番茄新品种IVF1305的选育[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2018,(6):70-73.
	LIU Lei, LI Junming, ZHENG Zheng, et al. The breeding of a new early-maturing tomato variety IVF1305[J]. China Vegetables, 2018,(6):70-73.
[10]	周长海, 潘凤英, 肖人鹏, 等. 扬稻6号早熟突变体扬6早的特征特性鉴定[J]. 南方农业学报, 2013, 44(11):1800-1805.
	ZHOU Changhai, PAN Fengying, XIAO Renpeng, et al. Characteristics identification of early maturity mutant Yangdao 6[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2013, 44(11):1800-1805.
[11]	Serrat X, Esteban Roger, Guibourt N, et al. EMS mutagenesis in mature seed-derived rice calli as a new method for rapidly obtaining TILLING mutant populations[J]. Plant Methods, 2014, 10:5(3): 467-475. DOI URL
[12]	张晓勤, 薛大伟, 周伟辉, 等. 用甲基磺酸乙酯(EMS)诱变的大麦浙农的3号突变体的筛选和鉴定[J]. 浙江大学学报, 2011, 37(2):37-52.
	ZHANG Xiaoqin, XUE Dawei, ZHUO Weihui, et al. Screening and identification of No. 3 mutant of barley Zhenong mutagenized with ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS)[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University, 2011, 37(2):37-52.
[13]	佟星, 赵波, 金文林, 等. 理化诱变小豆京农 6 号突变体的鉴定[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36 (4):565-573. DOI
	TONG Xing, ZHAO Bo, JIN Wenlin, et al. 2010. Identification of Mutants from Azuki Bean (Vigna angularisi) Jingnong 6 Seed Induced by Physical and Chemical Agents[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(4): 565-573. DOI
[14]	Shiwa Y, Fukushima-Tanaka S, Kasahara K, et al. Whole-Genome Profiling of a Novel Mutagenesis Technique Using Proofreading-Deficient DNA Polymerase δ[J]. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2012, 2012(1):860797.
[15]	Sabetta W, Alba V, Blanco A, et al. sunTILL: a TILLING re-source for gene function analysis in sunflower[J]. Plant Methods, 2011, 7(1):20-20. DOI PMID
[16]	卢银, 刘梦洋, 赵建军, 等. 大白菜突变体库的构建及 M 2 叶片表型变异的研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(8):1609-1619.
	LU Yin, LIU Mengyang, ZHAO Jiianjun, et al. Construction of Chinese Cabbage Mutant Library and Study on Phenotypic Variation of M 2 Leaves[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(8):1609-1619.
[17]	刘根忠, 王云飞, 孟祥飞, 等. EMS诱变的‘里格尔87-5’番茄M2群体突变体表型及其抗坏血酸研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(1):120-130. DOI
	LIU Genzhong, WANG Yunfei, MENG Xiangfei, et al. Study on the phenotype and ascorbic acid of'Riger 87-5' tomato M2 population mutant induced by EMS[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(1):120-130. DOI
[18]	张萍, 姜景彬, 杨欢欢, 等. 番茄EMS突变体库的构建及表型分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2019,(7):1-9.
	ZHANG Ping, JIANG Jingbin, YANG Huabhuan, et al. Construction and phenotype analysis of tomato EMS mutant library[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(7):1-9.
[19]	尚娜. EMS诱变番茄突变体库的构建及表型分析[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2017.
	SHANG Na. Construction and phenotype analysis of tomato mutant library induced by EMS[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2017.
[20]	余庆辉, 张勇, 杨生保, 等. 加工番茄叶片与产量的相关性及叶内生理性酶活性比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2007, 44(3):259-263.
	YU Qinghui, ZHANG Yong, YANG Shengbao, et al. The correlation between processed tomato leaves and yield and comparative analysis of physiological enzyme activities in leaves[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 44(3):259-263.
[21]	王永飞, 王鸣, 王雷, 等. 加工番茄丰产性状和品质性状的典型相关分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 1999, 32(1):20-25.
	Wang Yongfei, WANG Ming, WANG Lei, et al. Canonical correlation analysis of high-yield traits and quality traits of processed tomato[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1999, 32(1): 20-25.
[22]	武路广, 霍梅俊, 刘思奇, 等. 白羊草干草产量与主要农艺性状的多元回归及通径分析[J]. 草地学报, 2013, 21(4):697-701. DOI
	WU Luguang, HUO Meijun, LIU Siqi, et al. Multivariate regression and path analysis of hay yield and main agronomic traits of White Leymus chinensis[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(4): 697-701.
[23]	杜家菊, 陈志伟. 使用SPSS线性回归实现通径分析的方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2010, 45(2):4-6.
	DU Jiaju, CHEN Zhiwei. A method of path analysis using SPSS linear regression[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2010, 45(2):4-6.
[24]	庞胜群, 郑群, 辛建华, 等. 加工番茄主要农艺性状与产量的相关及通径分析[J]. 长江蔬菜, 2010,(22):26-28.
	PANG Shengqun, ZHENG Qun, XIN Jianhua, et al. Correlation and Path Analysis of the Main Agronomic Characters and Yield of Processing Tomato[J]. Journal of Changjiang Vegetables, 2010,(22):26-28.
[25]	贾晓军, 陈芳, 兰创业. 鲜食番茄农艺性状和产量的相关性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2017,(5):27-30.
	JIA Xiaojun, CHEN Fang, LAN Chuangye. Correlation Analysis of Agronomic Characters and Yield of Fresh Tomato[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2017,(5):27-30.
[26]	杨荣昌, 徐鹤林. 番茄早熟性构成及遗传相关分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 1992,(2):48-50.
	YANG Rongchang, XU Helin. The composition and genetic correlation analysis of tomato early maturity[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 1992,(2):48-50.
[27]	明道绪. 通径分析[M]. 雅安: 四川农业大学学报编辑部, 1990.
	MING Daoxu. Path analysis[M]. Ya'an: Editorial Department of Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 1990.

品种名称 Cultivar	单果重(g) Weight of single fruit	熟性 Maturity
里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5	53.52	早熟
里格尔87-5系1(TH11-2) Rigel 87-5 Series 1 (TH11-2)	60.63	早熟
里格尔87-5系2(TY11-1) Rigel 87-5 Series 2(TY11-1)	63.77	早熟
JW9	96.8	中熟
JW9系1(TH12-6) JW9 series 1 (TH12-6)	98.73	早熟
JW9系2(TH12-7) JW9 series 2(TH12-7)	101.42	早熟

品种名称 Cultivar	单果重(g) Weight of single fruit	熟性 Maturity
里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5	53.52	早熟
里格尔87-5系1(TH11-2) Rigel 87-5 Series 1 (TH11-2)	60.63	早熟
里格尔87-5系2(TY11-1) Rigel 87-5 Series 2(TY11-1)	63.77	早熟
JW9	96.8	中熟
JW9系1(TH12-6) JW9 series 1 (TH12-6)	98.73	早熟
JW9系2(TH12-7) JW9 series 2(TH12-7)	101.42	早熟

性状 Character	里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5	TH11-2	TY11-1	JW9	TH12-6	TH12-7	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation	变异系数 Coefficient of Variation
株高 Plant height (cm, X₁)	36.07	37.09	43.68	48.43	50.05	52.94	44.79	8.11	0.181
叶面积 Leaf area (cm², X₂)	21.20	23.00	27.99	33.17	33.08	31.18	28.27	5.166	0.183
茎粗 Stem thickness (mm, X₃)	11.85	12.79	12.22	11.58	11.55	12.36	11.71	1.17	0.100
始花节位 First flower node position (individual,X₄)	8.50	7.50	7.00	9.00	8.00	7.25	7.88	0.95	0.121
现蕾期 Budding period (d,X₅)	60.00	57.00	58.00	64.00	62.00	57.00	59.67	2.68	0.045
始花期 Initial flowering (d,X₆)	74.17	68.75	71.00	85.25	74.75	70.25	74.17	5.65	0.076
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity (d,X₇)	47.00	42.00	43.75	51.00	47.75	42.75	45.70	3.86	0.084
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm, X₈)	45.11	38.91	43.11	46.81	52.20	50.35	46.08	5.93	0.129
果实纵径 Fruit length (mm,X₉)	55.07	46.94	52.57	63.03	65.88	64.32	57.97	8.06	0.139
单果重 Single fruit weight (kg,X₁₀)	0.05	0.06	0.06	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.08	0.02	0.291
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit (individual,X₁₁)	8.50	7.25	9.75	8.75	7.50	8.75	8.42	1.91	0.227
前期产量 Early production (kg,X₁₂)	0.46	0.43	0.61	0.85	0.75	0.88	0.66	0.23	0.348

性状 Character	里格尔87-5 Rigel 87-5	TH11-2	TY11-1	JW9	TH12-6	TH12-7	平均值 Average value	标准差 Standard deviation	变异系数 Coefficient of Variation
株高 Plant height (cm, X₁)	36.07	37.09	43.68	48.43	50.05	52.94	44.79	8.11	0.181
叶面积 Leaf area (cm², X₂)	21.20	23.00	27.99	33.17	33.08	31.18	28.27	5.166	0.183
茎粗 Stem thickness (mm, X₃)	11.85	12.79	12.22	11.58	11.55	12.36	11.71	1.17	0.100
始花节位 First flower node position (individual,X₄)	8.50	7.50	7.00	9.00	8.00	7.25	7.88	0.95	0.121
现蕾期 Budding period (d,X₅)	60.00	57.00	58.00	64.00	62.00	57.00	59.67	2.68	0.045
始花期 Initial flowering (d,X₆)	74.17	68.75	71.00	85.25	74.75	70.25	74.17	5.65	0.076
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity (d,X₇)	47.00	42.00	43.75	51.00	47.75	42.75	45.70	3.86	0.084
果实横径 Fruit diameter (mm, X₈)	45.11	38.91	43.11	46.81	52.20	50.35	46.08	5.93	0.129
果实纵径 Fruit length (mm,X₉)	55.07	46.94	52.57	63.03	65.88	64.32	57.97	8.06	0.139
单果重 Single fruit weight (kg,X₁₀)	0.05	0.06	0.06	0.10	0.10	0.10	0.08	0.02	0.291
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit (individual,X₁₁)	8.50	7.25	9.75	8.75	7.50	8.75	8.42	1.91	0.227
前期产量 Early production (kg,X₁₂)	0.46	0.43	0.61	0.85	0.75	0.88	0.66	0.23	0.348

参数 Parameter		处理组 Treatment group
参数 Parameter		X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈	X₉	X₁₀	X₁₁	X₁₂
对照组 Control group	X₁		0.128	0.334^*	0.301	0.412	0.500^*	0.375	0.527^*	0.700^**	0.736^**	0.653^**	0.682^**
	X₂	-0.242		0.055	0.078	-0.314	-0.091	-0.319	0.173	0.101	-0.078	0.552^*	0.465
	X₃	0.4	0.325		0.225	0.358	0.49	0.526^*	0.635^**	0.602^**	0.382	0.557^*	0.532^*
	X₄	0.644	-0.295	0.743^*		0.550^*	0.780^**	0.4	0.365	0.428	0.107	0.14	0.213
	X₅	0.850^**	-0.561	0.678	0.577		0.891^**	0.922^**	0.341	0.452	0.363	0.011	0.135
	X₆	0.904^**	-0.632	0.636	0.601	0.991^**		0.822^**	0.462	0.593^*	0.341	0.249	0.323
	X₇	0.906^**	-0.628	0.639	0.646	0.987^**	0.995^**		0.444	0.576^*	0.496	0.113	0.236
	X₈	-0.27	0.119	-0.201	-0.592	-0.441	-0.449	-0.487		0.818^**	0.47	0.489	0.540^*
	X₉	-0.585	0.474	-0.228	-0.559	-0.764^*	-0.768^*	-0.811^*	0.783^**		0.799^**	0.675^**	0.782^**
	X₁₀	0.811^*	-0.481	0.659	0.498	0.976^**	0.968^**	0.956^**	-0.405	-0.71		0.632^**	0.770^**
	X₁₁	0.551	-0.191	0.396	0.646	0.43	0.474	0.515	-0.602	-0.557	0.506		0.958^**
	X₁₂	0.793^*	-0.383	0.619	0.688	0.848^**	0.868^**	0.884^**	-0.609	-0.77	0.892^**	0.822^*

Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants

加工番茄早熟突变体农艺性状相关性及通径分析

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

性状 Character	早熟性指数 Precocity index	始花节位 First flower node	现蕾期 Budding period	始花期 Initial flowering	开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity	单果重 Single fruit weight	一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit	前期产量 Early production
早熟性指数 Precocity index	1	-0.1980	-0.358	-0.209	-0.306	0.457^*	0.590^**	0.723^**
始花节位 First flower node	-0.198	1	0.651^**	0.671^**	0.572^**	0.18	0.006	0.202
现蕾期 Budding period	-0.358	0.651^**	1	0.917^**	0.876^**	0.361	-0.023	0.314
始花期 Initial flowering	-0.209	0.671^**	0.917^**	1	0.888^**	0.294	0.122	0.354
开花至成熟天数 Days from flowering to maturity	-0.306	0.572^**	0.876^**	0.888^**	1	0.224	0.082	0.265
单果重 Single fruit weight	0.457^*	0.18	0.361 0	0.294	0.224	1	-0.067	0.822^**
一二穗果数 One or two ears of fruit	0.590^**	0.006 0	-0.023	0.122	0.082	-0.067	1	0.492^*
前期产量 Early production	0.723^**	0.202 0	0.314	0.354	0.265	0.822^**	0.492^*	1

偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient	t检验值 t test value	显著性水平P Significance level P	方程 Equation
r(Y,X₁)=-0.084	-0.001	0.999 0	相关系数R=0.990,F值=65.482
r(Y,X₁₀)=0.819	5.253	0.006 0	显著水平P=0.001,调整后的相关系数Ra=0.965
r(Y,X₁₁)=0.669	5.851	0.004 0	Durbin-Watson统计量 d=2.576

偏相关系数 Partial correlation coefficient	t检验值 t test value	显著性水平P Significance level P	方程 Equation
r(Y,X₁)=0.252	-0.904	0.384 0	相关系数R=0.982,F值=108.224
r(Y,X₁₀)=0.734	3.743	0.003 0	显著水平P=0.000,调整后的相关系数Ra=0.955
r(Y,X₁₁)=0.952	10.739	0.000 0	Durbin-Watson统计量 d=2.181

自变量 Independent variable	与Y的简单相关系数 Simple correlation coefficient with Y	通径系数 (直接作用) Path coefficient (Direct action)	间接通径系数 (间接作用) Indirect diameter coefficient (indirect action)
自变量 Independent variable	与Y的简单相关系数 Simple correlation coefficient with Y	通径系数 (直接作用) Path coefficient (Direct action)	X₁₀	X₁₁
X₁₀	0.905	0.639		0.323 3
X₁₁	0.705	0.499	0.252

[1]	TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202.
[2]	CHEN Yong, ZHOU Lei, SUI Chun, LIN Caixia. The characteristics of 32 cultivated germplasms of Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus in Xinjiang production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314.
[3]	MIAO Yu, CHEN Cuixia, MA Yanming, XING Guofang, DONG Yusheng, CHEN Zhijun, WANG Xian, XIANG Li. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of 276 Central Asian barley germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895.
[4]	YE Pingyi, LONG Yilei, TANG Yanping, DU Xiao, AN Mengjie, TAO Zhixin, LIANG Farui, AI Xiantao, HU Shoulin. Identification and evaluation of fruit branch angle and machine-picked agronomic traits in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1318-1327.
[5]	LIU Yue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, YU Yuehua, WANG Runqi, LI Dandan, SHI Shubing. Comparison of peanut varieties with different high oleic acid under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1361-1367.
[6]	Mahemuti Abulaiti, Muhetaer zhare, Mireguli Waili, Hadier Yishake. Correlation and regression analysis between leaf margin scorch diseases and leaf nutrient content of walnut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 945-953.
[7]	WANG Jijiao, PAN Yue, WANG Shiwei, HAN Zhengwei, MA Yong, HU Haifang, WANG Baoqing. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients and the quality of Beibinghong grape juice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 355-364.
[8]	YANG Cunming, ZHANG Xiaoxue, ZHANG Menghua, ZHAO Zhiwen, LI Fengjie, HUANG Xixia, LI Jie, Aizimaiti Awuti, HE Junmin, LI Xue, LI Tingting, TANG Li, ZHANG Wenjing, TIAN Yuezhen, TIAN Kechuan. Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 514-520.
[9]	YANG Xiangbo, CHEN Liangyu, YANG Songnan, CHEN Xifeng, XING Weiming, LI Xueying, CONG Weixuan, ZANG Zhenyuan, ZANG Yuanbo, ZHANG Jun. Phenotype analysis and comprehensive evaluation of spring soybean germplasm resources from northeast China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933.
[10]	LI Yali, Halihashi , TANG Yali, DUAN jingjing, LI Qingjun. Effect of NP reduction and K synergism on yield and nutrient absorption of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3014-3019.
[11]	LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, SHU Sheng, MA Quanhui, HE Miao, DUAN Yifan, WU Hui. Comparative analysis of agronomic traits of different processing tomato varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2676-2683.
[12]	CUI Yujiang, GONG Zhaolong, WANG Junduo, ZHENG Juyun, SANG Zhiwei, YANG Ni, LIANG Yajun, LI Xueyuan, QU Yanying. Comprehensive evaluation of basic agronomic traits and yield components of 245 Gossypium hirsutum L. varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2358-2365.
[13]	SHAO Jiang, ZHAO Yun, HU Xiangwei, LIU Jie, Nasirula Keremu, SHI Shubing, FENG Guojun. Effects of drought stress on foxtail millet yield and dry matter accumulation in different periods [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(10): 2388-2395.
[14]	OUYANG Danhua, ZHAO Kang, SONG Dongbo, LIU Ziqing, GUO Wangzhen, LIU Yan, GU Aixing, Azhatiguli Maimaitituer, Alikaerjiang Amaier. Identification and comprehensive analysis of Verticillium wilt resistance in 35 cotton strains [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 9-18.
[15]	WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, GAO Wenju, LONG Yilei, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090.