Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.029

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (2): 514-520.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.02.029

• Microbes·Physiology and Biochemistry·Animal Husbandry Veterinarian • Previous Articles

Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding

YANG Cunming¹^,²(), ZHANG Xiaoxue¹, ZHANG Menghua¹, ZHAO Zhiwen¹, LI Fengjie¹, HUANG Xixia¹, LI Jie³, Aizimaiti Awuti³, HE Junmin², LI Xue¹, LI Tingting¹, TANG Li¹, ZHANG Wenjing¹, TIAN Yuezhen⁴(), TIAN Kechuan²()

1. College of Animal Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan 250100, China
3. Xingke Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Co., Ltd., Baicheng County, Aksu Xinjiang 842300, China
4. Institute of Animal Science, Xinjiang Academy of Animal Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2023-06-08 Online:2024-02-20 Published:2024-03-19
Correspondence author: TIAN Kechuan(1963-), male, from Xichun Ningxia,researcher, research direction of animal genetics and breeding,(E-mail)tiankechuan@163.com;TIAN Yuezhen(1986-), female,from Changji Xinjiang, researcher, research direction of animal genetics and breeding,(E-mail)tian306656637@126.com.
Supported by:
Outstanding Youth Fund of Xinjiang Autonomous Region(2022D01E64);National Sheep Industry Technology System for Fluff Wool(CARS-39);Special Training Project for Ethnic Minorities in Xinjiang Autonomous Region(2020D03016);Innovation Training Program for College Students(dxscx2021100)

细毛羊育种目标性状的相关关系及差异分析

杨存明¹^,²(), 张晓雪¹, 张梦华¹, 赵志文¹, 李峰洁¹, 黄锡霞¹, 李杰³, 艾孜买提·阿吾提³, 何军敏², 李雪¹, 李婷婷¹, 唐丽¹, 张文静¹, 田月珍⁴(), 田可川²()

1.新疆农业大学动物科学学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.山东省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所,济南 250100
3.拜城县兴科农牧业有限责任公司,新疆阿克苏 842300
4.新疆绒毛用羊遗传育种与繁殖重点实验室/新疆畜牧科学院畜牧研究所,乌鲁木齐 830011

通讯作者: 田可川(1963-),男,宁夏西春人,研究员,研究方向为动物遗传育种,(E-mail)tiankechuan@163.com；田月珍(1986-),女,新疆昌吉人,副研究员,研究方向为动物遗传育种,(E-mail)tian306656637@126.com
作者简介:杨存明(1998-),男,山东嘉祥人,硕士研究生,研究方向为动物遗传育种,(E-mail)yangcunming0405@163.com
基金资助:
新疆维吾尔自治区杰出青年基金项目(2022D01E64);国家绒毛用羊产业技术体系(CARS-39);新疆维吾尔自治区少数民族特培项目(2020D03016);大学生创新训练计划项目(dxscx2021100)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the correlation and difference between the breeding target traits of Subo merino sheep and Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)ewes, and to analyze the genetic rules between traits, in order to provide a theoretical basis for the breeding planning of Xinjiang fine wool sheep.【Methods】 A total of 1,546 ewes were collected, measured and sorted out(Subo merino sheep:497; Individual identification and shearing records of Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type):1,049 animals), and the laboratory completed the determination of mean fiber diameter, fiber diameter standard deviation and fiber diameter coefficient of variation.SPSS 25.0 software was used to descriptively collect the data of wool traits(mean fiber diameter, standard deviation of fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation, hair length, shearing amount), reproductive traits(birth type)and growth traits(physical score, weight at time of identification), and clarify the correlation between traits, and in addition to that, one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)was applied to compare the differences between different breeds and birth types.【Results】 There were no significant differences between birth types of Subo merino sheep and Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)and related hair traits(mean fiber diameter, standard deviation of fiber diameter, fiber diameter coefficient of variation and hair length)and growth traits(physical score and weight at identification)(P>0.05), and the body weight of Subo merino sheep and Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)were significantly correlated with the average fiber diameter, hair length and shearing amount(P<0.01), there were different degrees of correlation between the hair traits.【Conclusion】 The Subo merino sheep were better than that of the Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)in the wool traits(mean fiber diameter and fiber diameter standard deviation)and growth traits(weight at time of identification), and the average fiber diameter ranged from 16.86-19.01 μm, which was a high-quality ultra-fine wool sheep.

Key words: Subo merino sheep; Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type); breeding target traits; correlation analysis

摘要：

【目的】研究苏博美利奴羊和中国美利奴羊(新疆型)周岁母羊各育种目标性状间的相关及差异性,分析各性状间的遗传规律,为提高新疆细毛羊的育种进程提供科学依据。【方法】收集、测量并整理共计1 546 只周岁母羊(苏博美利奴羊497 只,中国美利奴羊(新疆型)1 049 只)的个体鉴定记录和剪毛记录,测定平均纤维直径、纤维直径标准差和纤维直径变异系数。利用SPSS 25.0软件,对毛用性状(平均纤维直径、纤维直径标准差、纤维直径变异系数、毛长、剪毛量)、繁殖性状(出生类型)以及生长性状(体格评分、鉴定时体重)数据进行描述性统计,分析各性状间相关关系,采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)不同品种以及不同类型间的差异。【结果】苏博美利奴羊和中国美利奴羊(新疆型)出生类型与相关毛用性状(平均纤维直径、纤维直径标准差、纤维直径变异系数和毛长)以及生长性状(体格评分和鉴定时体重)均无显著差异(P>0.05),苏博美利奴羊和中国美利奴羊(新疆型)两品种间鉴定时体重均与平均纤维直径、毛长以及剪毛量等毛用性状呈极显著相关(P<0.01),各毛用性状间存在不同程度的相关性。【结论】苏博美利奴羊在毛用性状(平均纤维直径和纤维直径标准差)和生长性状(鉴定时体重)均优于中国美利奴羊(新疆型),平均纤维直径的范围在16.86~19.01 μm,属优质超细型细毛羊。

关键词: 苏博美利奴羊, 中国美利奴羊(新疆型), 育种目标性状, 相关性

CLC Number:

S826

YANG Cunming, ZHANG Xiaoxue, ZHANG Menghua, ZHAO Zhiwen, LI Fengjie, HUANG Xixia, LI Jie, Aizimaiti Awuti, HE Junmin, LI Xue, LI Tingting, TANG Li, ZHANG Wenjing, TIAN Yuezhen, TIAN Kechuan. Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 514-520.

杨存明, 张晓雪, 张梦华, 赵志文, 李峰洁, 黄锡霞, 李杰, 艾孜买提·阿吾提, 何军敏, 李雪, 李婷婷, 唐丽, 张文静, 田月珍, 田可川. 细毛羊育种目标性状的相关关系及差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(2): 514-520.

Figures/Tables 4

References 30

[1]	张沅. 家畜育种学(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018.
	ZHANG Yuan. Livestock Breeding (2nd ed)[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2018.
[2]	张文广. 内蒙古绒山羊开放核心群优化育种规划的研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2004.
	ZHANG Wenguang. Research on optimal breeding planning of open core group of cashmere goats in Inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2004.
[3]	赵晓平. 敖汉细毛羊遗传参数估计及核心群育种效果分析研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2008.
	ZHAO Xiaoping. Estimation of genetic parameters and analysis of breeding effect of Aohan fine wool sheep[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2008.
[4]	王鹏宇. 青海细毛羊封闭与开放核心群育种规划效果评估[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2012.
	WANG Pengyu. Evaluation of breeding effect of closed and open core group breeding plan of Qinghai fine wool sheep[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2012.
[5]	努尔比亚·吾布力. 应用MTDFREML法和动物模型BLUP对中国美利奴羊(新疆型)遗传参数估计和遗传评定[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2012.
	Nuerbiya Wubuli. Estimation and genetic evaluation of genetic parameters of Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)using MTDFREML method and animal model BLUP[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2012.
[6]	赵永璋, 王玉琴. 现代中国养羊[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
	ZHAO Yongzhang, WANG Yuqin. Sheep farming in modern China[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2005.
[7]	Hatcher S, Preston J. Genetic relationships of breech cover, wrinkle and wool coverage scores with key production traits in Australian Merino sheep[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2018, 164:48-57. DOI URL
[8]	Dominik S, Swan A A. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for reproduction, production and bodyweight traits in Australian fine-wool Merino sheep[J]. Animal Production Science, 2018, 58(2):207-212. DOI URL
[9]	Mortimer S I, Hatcher S, Fogarty N M, et al. Genetic parameters for wool traits, live weight, and ultrasound carcass traits in Merino sheep[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 95(5):1879-1891. DOI PMID
[10]	Mortimer S I, Hatcher S, Fogarty N M, et al. Genetic correlations between wool traits and carcass traits in Merino sheep[J]. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, 95(6):2385-2398. DOI PMID
[11]	关鸣轩, 魏趁, 佀博学, 等. 苏博美利奴羊主要经济性状的遗传参数估计[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2022, 58(1):97-101.
	GUAN Mingxuan, WEI Chen, SI Boxue, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters of main economic traits of Subo Merino sheep[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2022, 58(1):97-101.
[12]	柏妍, 田可川, 田月珍, 等. 中国美利奴羊(新疆型)羊毛纤维直径与鉴定性状的相关分析[J]. 现代畜牧兽医, 2015(9):6-12.
	BAI Yan, TIAN Kechuan, TIAN Yuezhen, et al. Correlation analysis between fiber diameter and identification traits of Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)[J]. Modern Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2015(9):6-12.
[13]	王浩, 徐新明, 石刚, 等. 非遗传因素对多胎细毛羊初生重和断奶重的影响[J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2021, 53(1):19-23.
	WANG Hao, XU Xinming, SHI Gang. Effects of non-genetic factors on birth weight and weaning weight of multiple fine-haired sheep[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2021, 53(1):19-23.
[14]	魏趁, 陈胜磊, 关鸣轩, 等. 苏博美利奴羊育种目标经济价值的计算[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2022, 43(4):26-32.
	WEI Chen, CHEN Shengli, GUAN Minghon, et al. Calculation of Economic Value of Subo Merinoi Sheep Breeding Target[J]. Chinese Journal of Livestock Ecology, 2022, 43(4):26-32.
[15]	古丽努尔·马哈提, 玛尔孜亚·亚森, 努力古丽·塔力甫汗, 等. 中国美利奴羊周岁母羊羊毛纤维直径及其变异分析[J]. 草食家畜, 2017, (2):27-31.
	Gulinuer Mahati, Maerziya Yasen, Nuliguli Talifuhen, et al. Fiber diameter and variation analysis of wool of one-year-old ewes of merino sheep in China[J]. Herbivorous Livestock, 2017, (2):27-31.
[16]	孙丽敏, 杨雨江, 姜怀志, 等. 乾华肉用美利奴羊主要经济性状遗传参数的估计[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2018, 54(3):37-40.
	SUN Limin, YANG Yujiang, JIANG Huaizhi, et al. Estimation of genetic parameters of main economic traits of merino sheep for Qianhua meat[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 54(3):37-40.
[17]	Bangar YC, Magotra A, Yadav AS. Estimates of covariance components and genetic parameters for growth, average daily gain and Kleiber ratio in Harnali sheep[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2020, 52(5):2291-2296. DOI PMID
[18]	Ambreen H D, Nazir A.Ganai, Nusrat N.Khan, et al. Estimation of genetic, heritability, and phenotypic trends for weight and wool traits in Rambouillet sheep[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2019, 177:133-140 DOI URL
[19]	张漫, 范雪, 曾伟丹, 等. 优质超细毛羊纤维直径选育效果分析[J]. 家畜生态学报, 2020, 41(9):30-33.
	ZHANG Man, FAN Xue, ZENG Weidan, et al. Analysis of diameter selection effect of high-quality ultra-fine wool sheep fiber[J]. Chinese Journal of Livestock Ecology, 2020, 41(9):30-33.
[20]	NY/T 1236-2006. 绵、山羊生产性能测定技术规范[S].
	NY/T 1236-2006. Technical specification for determination of production performance of cotton and goat[S].
[21]	拉扎特·艾尼瓦尔, 玛尔孜娅·亚森, 热比古丽·萨吾特别克, 等. 中国美利奴超细型羊单羔和双羔生长发育及生产性能的比较研究[J]. 今日畜牧兽医, 2021, 37(4):9-10.
	Lazhate Ainiwaer, Maerziya Yasen, Rebiguli Sawutebieke, et al. Comparative study on growth, development and production performance of Chinese merino ultrafine sheep single lamb and double lamb[J]. Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine Today, 2021, 37(4):9-10.
[22]	赵冰茹, 付雪峰, 于丽娟, 等. 中国美利奴羊(新疆型)各品系间毛性状的差异分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(11):2135-2141.
	ZHAO Bingru, FU Xuefeng, YU Lijuan, et al. Differences in hair traits between strains of Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(11):2135-2141.
[23]	Safari E, Fogarty N M, Gilmour A R, et al. Genetic correlations among and between wool, growth and reproduction traits in Merino sheep[J]. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2007, 124(2):65-72. PMID
[24]	李桂英, 张军. 影响高寒牧区细毛羊繁殖力的主要因素及应对措施[J]. 养殖与饲料, 2014,(7):25-27.
	LI Guiying, ZHANG Jun. Main factors affecting the fertility of fine wool sheep in alpine pastoral areas and their countermeasures[J]. Aquaculture and Feed, 2014,(7):25-27.
[25]	李彦飞, 黄锡霞, 田可川, 等. 中国美利奴羊(新疆型)毛纤维直径与弯曲数分析[J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2014, 50(15):15-18.
	LI Yanfei, HUANG Xixia, TIAN Kechuan, et al. Analysis of hair fiber diameter and bending number of Chinese merino sheep(Xinjiang type)[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2014, 50(15):15-18.
[26]	Wei C, Luo H, Zhao B, et al. The effect of integrating genomic information into genetic evaluations of chinese Merino sheep[J]. Animals, 2020, 10(4):569. DOI URL
[27]	Baba MA, Ahanger SA, Hamadani A, et al. Factors affecting wool characteristics of sheep reared in Kashmir[J]. Trop Anim Health Prod., 2020; 52(4):2129-2133. DOI PMID
[28]	Rather M A, Shanaz S, Ganai N A, et al. Genetic evaluation of wool traits of Kashmir Merino sheep in organized farms[J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2019, 177:14-17. DOI URL
[29]	Atav R, Gürkan Ünal P, Soysal MĪ. Investigation of the quality characteristics of wool obtained from Karacabey Merino sheep grown in Thrace region-Turkey[J]. Journal of Natural Fibers, 2022, 19(3):1107-1114. DOI URL
[30]	Islamov E I, Kulmanova G A, Kulataev B T, et al. Enhancement of the Reliability of Animal Genotyping Regarding the Betterment of Wool Productivity in South-Kazakh Merino Sheep in Kazakhstan[J]. Archives of Razi Institute, 2021, 76(6):1703-1714. DOI PMID

性状 Traits	品种 Breed	样本量 Sample size	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV(%)	范围 Min-Max
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter(μm)	苏博美利奴羊	497	17.16	1.06	6.17	13.90~19.92
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter(μm)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	19.74	1.38	6.97	17.80~23.90
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation(%)	苏博美利奴羊	497	3.68	0.48	13.02	2.51~5.09
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation(%)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	4.22	0.49	11.60	2.87~5.80
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance(%)	苏博美利奴羊	497	21.42	2.54	11.88	15.09~30.05
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance(%)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	21.41	2.18	10.18	14.63~28.66
毛长 Staple length(cm)	苏博美利奴羊	497	10.24	0.85	8.27	8.00~12.50
毛长 Staple length(cm)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	10.31	0.91	8.80	8.00~13.00
体格评分 Body size	苏博美利奴羊	497	4.12	0.61	14.73	3.00~5.00
体格评分 Body size	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	4.18	0.63	15.07	3.00~5.00
鉴定时体重 Body weight(Kg)	苏博美利奴羊	497	37.09	6.12	16.50	25.00~55.00
鉴定时体重 Body weight(Kg)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	36.34	5.83	16.04	23.00~54.00
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight(Kg)	苏博美利奴羊	497	3.59	0.62	17.19	1.70~5.50
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight(Kg)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	3.56	0.70	19.71	1.50~5.80

性状 Traits	品种 Breed	样本量 Sample size	平均值 Mean	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV(%)	范围 Min-Max
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter(μm)	苏博美利奴羊	497	17.16	1.06	6.17	13.90~19.92
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter(μm)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	19.74	1.38	6.97	17.80~23.90
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation(%)	苏博美利奴羊	497	3.68	0.48	13.02	2.51~5.09
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation(%)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	4.22	0.49	11.60	2.87~5.80
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance(%)	苏博美利奴羊	497	21.42	2.54	11.88	15.09~30.05
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance(%)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	21.41	2.18	10.18	14.63~28.66
毛长 Staple length(cm)	苏博美利奴羊	497	10.24	0.85	8.27	8.00~12.50
毛长 Staple length(cm)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	10.31	0.91	8.80	8.00~13.00
体格评分 Body size	苏博美利奴羊	497	4.12	0.61	14.73	3.00~5.00
体格评分 Body size	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	4.18	0.63	15.07	3.00~5.00
鉴定时体重 Body weight(Kg)	苏博美利奴羊	497	37.09	6.12	16.50	25.00~55.00
鉴定时体重 Body weight(Kg)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	36.34	5.83	16.04	23.00~54.00
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight(Kg)	苏博美利奴羊	497	3.59	0.62	17.19	1.70~5.50
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight(Kg)	中国美利奴羊(新疆型)	1 049	3.56	0.70	19.71	1.50~5.80

性状 Traits	出生类型 Body type	平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter	纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation	纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance	毛长 Staple length	体格评分 Body size	鉴定时体重 Body weight	剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight
出生类型 Body type	1	0.075	0.006	-0.033	-0.048	-0.011	0.028	0.005
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter	0.001	1	0.428^**	-0.048	0.036	0.099^*	0.321^**	0.142^**
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation	-0.026	0.494^**	1	0.880^**	0.010	0.087	0.091^*	-0.103*
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance	-0.034	-0.109^**	0.806^**	1	-0.011	0.043	-0.058	-0.186^**
毛长 Staple length	0.017	0.061^*	0.005	-0.031	1	0.399^**	0.127^**	0.005
体格评分 Body size	0.018	0.072^*	-0.041	-0.091^**	0.333^**	1	0.545^**	0.049
鉴定时体重 Body weight	0.052	0.124^**	-0.090^**	-0.181^**	0.203^**	0.721^**	1	0.360^**
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight	0.091^**	0.041	-0.145^**	-0.188^**	0.090^**	0.195^**	0.357^**	1

性状 Traits	出生类型 Body type	平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter	纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation	纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance	毛长 Staple length	体格评分 Body size	鉴定时体重 Body weight	剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight
出生类型 Body type	1	0.075	0.006	-0.033	-0.048	-0.011	0.028	0.005
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter	0.001	1	0.428^**	-0.048	0.036	0.099^*	0.321^**	0.142^**
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation	-0.026	0.494^**	1	0.880^**	0.010	0.087	0.091^*	-0.103*
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance	-0.034	-0.109^**	0.806^**	1	-0.011	0.043	-0.058	-0.186^**
毛长 Staple length	0.017	0.061^*	0.005	-0.031	1	0.399^**	0.127^**	0.005
体格评分 Body size	0.018	0.072^*	-0.041	-0.091^**	0.333^**	1	0.545^**	0.049
鉴定时体重 Body weight	0.052	0.124^**	-0.090^**	-0.181^**	0.203^**	0.721^**	1	0.360^**
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight	0.091^**	0.041	-0.145^**	-0.188^**	0.090^**	0.195^**	0.357^**	1

品种 Breed	出生类型 Body type	平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter	纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation	纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance	毛长 Staple length	体格评分 Body size	鉴定时体重 Body weight	剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight
苏博美利奴羊 Subo merino sheep	单羔	17.13±1.07^ns	3.68±0.47^ns	21.46±2.54^ns	10.25±0.84^ns	4.12±0.62^ns	37.02±6.10^ns	3.59±0.62^ns
苏博美利奴羊 Subo merino sheep	双羔	17.36±0.98^ns	3.68±0.51^ns	21.21±2.61^ns	10.13±0.89^ns	4.10±0.55^ns	37.52±6.30^ns	3.60±0.58^ns
中国美利奴羊 (新疆型) Chinese merino sheep (Xinjiang type)	单羔	19.74±1.36^ns	4.23±0.50^ns	21.43±2.22^ns	10.30±0.92^ns	4.17±0.63^ns	36.23±5.71^ns	3.54±0.69^Bb
中国美利奴羊 (新疆型) Chinese merino sheep (Xinjiang type)	双羔	19.75±1.48^ns	4.19±0.45^ns	21.21±1.89^ns	10.35±0.82^ns	4.21±0.63^ns	37.14±6.58^ns	3.73±0.74^Aa

Analysis of correlation and difference of target traits in fine wool sheep breeding

细毛羊育种目标性状的相关关系及差异分析

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 4

References 30

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

性状Traits	平方和SS Sum of squares SS	自由度DF Degree of freedom DF	均方MS Mean square MS	F值 F value
平均纤维直径 Mean fiber diameter	2 248.565	1	2 248.565	1 367.153^**
纤维直径标准差 Fiber diameter standard deviation	101.062	1	101.062	427.413^**
纤维直径变异系数 Fiber diameter coefficient of variance	0.083	1	0.083	0.016
毛长 Staple length	1.701	1	1.701	2.156
体格评分 Body size	1.044	1	1.044	2.690
鉴定时体重 Body weight	189.266	1	189.266	5.393*
剪毛量 Greasy fleece weight	0.371	1	0.371	0.812

[1]	Mahemuti Abulaiti, Muhetaer zhare, Mireguli Waili, Hadier Yishake. Correlation and regression analysis between leaf margin scorch diseases and leaf nutrient content of walnut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 945-953.
[2]	WANG Jijiao, PAN Yue, WANG Shiwei, HAN Zhengwei, MA Yong, HU Haifang, WANG Baoqing. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients and the quality of Beibinghong grape juice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 355-364.
[3]	OUYANG Danhua, ZHAO Kang, SONG Dongbo, LIU Ziqing, GUO Wangzhen, LIU Yan, GU Aixing, Azhatiguli Maimaitituer, Alikaerjiang Amaier. Identification and comprehensive analysis of Verticillium wilt resistance in 35 cotton strains [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 9-18.
[4]	WANG Peng, ZHENG Kai, ZHAO Jieyin, GAO Wenju, LONG Yilei, CHEN Quanjia, QU Yanying. Evaluation and index screening of heat resistance of Gossypium hirsutum germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2081-2090.
[5]	ZHAO Lianjia, LI Gan, XU Lin, YAN Guorong, LIU Ning, WANG Fan, DENG Chaohong, Abudukeyoumu Abudurezike, WANG Cong, WANG Wei. Analysis of the main characters of soybean varieties in Xinjiang and their correlation with yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1663-1670.
[6]	HUANG Qiannan, Maerheba Aisibaier, ZOU Hui, WANG Cairong, Ailimaimaiti Kuerban, SUN Na, LEI Junjie. Genetic diversity of main agronomic traits in Xinjiang winter wheat germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1050-1058.
[7]	SANG Zhiwei, LIANG Yajun, GONG Zhaolong, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, CHEN Quanjia. Analysis of mechanical harvesting characters of germplasm resources of different upland cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1088-1098.
[8]	LU Tao, ZENG Qingtao, ZHANG Wen, WANG Wenbo, WANG Zhengyang, YANG Rui, SUN Yuyan. Comprehensive evaluation of cotton yield and quality by principal component analysis and grey correlation analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1099-1109.
[9]	LI Shuo, WANG Juan, Nigary Yadikar, ZHU Jinfang, FENG Zuoshan, Parhat Ainiwaer. Functional components changes of different apricot cultivars in different development stages [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1200-1207.
[10]	DU Hongyan, PANG Shengqun, MA Haixiang, JI Xuehua. Correlation and path analysis of agronomic traits of processing tomato early maturity mutants [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 943-950.
[11]	MA Xu, ZHAO Ying, HAN Wei, WU Shengli, HAN Xiaoyan. Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis of Amino Acids in Seabuckthorn Fruit [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 378-388.
[12]	HOU Zhixiong, JING Changqing, CHEN Chen, WANG Gongxin, GUO Wenzhang, ZHAO Weikang. Spatiotemporal Variation of Vegetation Coverage of Natural Grassland in Northern Xinjiang in Recent 20 Years and Its Relationship with Meteorological Factors [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(2): 464-471.
[13]	HE Yawen, ZENG Bin, LI Mingkun, ZHONG Haixia, ZHANG Wen, ZHANG Chuan, WANG Min, WU Xinyu, ZHANG Fuchun. Study on fruit quality variation during ripening process of Thompson Seedless grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(12): 2982-2992.
[14]	ZHAO Yun, FENG Guojun, HU Xiangwei, LI Cuimei, LI Pengbing, Akbota Muheyati, BAI Ling. Analysis of main agronomic characters and yield of different replanted millet varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2453-2460.
[15]	YANG Minghua, WANG Qian, ZHOU Xinli, Aihemaitijiang Mahemuti, PEN Yuncheng, Aierjuma Tuluhan, Buayxam Namat, HOU Lili, LIU Qiang. Multiple Analysis on Character and Yield of Maize Hybrid Combinations [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2114-2122.