Comparative analysis of agronomic traits of different processing tomato varieties

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.11.008

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (11): 2676-2683.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.11.008

• Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Physiology and Biochemistry·Microbes • Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative analysis of agronomic traits of different processing tomato varieties

LI Chunyu¹(), TAN Zhanming²(), CHENG Yunxia², SHU Sheng³, MA Quanhui², HE Miao², DUAN Yifan¹, WU Hui⁴

1. College of Information Engineering, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
2. College of Horticulture and Forestry/South Xinjiang Facility Agriculture Brigade Key Laboratory, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300,China
3. College of Horticulture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095,China
4. College of Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China

Received:2024-04-28 Online:2024-11-20 Published:2025-01-08
Correspondence author: TAN Zhanming
Supported by:
Agricultural Key Core Technology Research Project of XPCC(NYHXGG2023AA311);2021 Tarim University College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Plan Project(2021131);The Third Division Tumushuke City Science and Technology Program Project(KY2022GG05)

不同加工番茄品种的农艺性状比较分析

李春雨¹(), 谭占明²(), 程云霞², 束胜³, 马全会², 何淼², 段轶帆¹, 吴慧⁴

1.塔里木大学信息工程学院,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.塔里木大学园艺与林学学院/南疆设施农业兵团重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300
3.南京农业大学园艺学院,南京 210000
4.新疆农业大学园艺学院,乌鲁木齐 830052

通讯作者: 谭占明
作者简介:李春雨(1992-),女,黑龙江齐齐哈尔人,讲师,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业信息化,(E-mail)1871916786@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团农业关键核心技术攻关项目(NYHXGG2023AA311);塔里木大学大学生创新创业训练计划项目(2021131);第三师图木舒克市科技计划项目(KY2022GG05)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Select suitable processing tomato varieties suitable for cultivation in Aral,Xinjiang.【Methods】 Nine processing tomato varieties were used as experimental materials.Twelve traits including plant height, stem diameter, leaf area, chlorophyll content, fruit shape index, single fruit weight, soluble solids, soluble sugar content, VC content, lycopene, total flavonoids content and soluble protein content of each variety were measured.Meanwhile, principal component analysis, membership function and cluster analysis were carried out.【Results】 Four principal components including plant height, soluble solids, VC content and soluble sugar were extracted.The comprehensive scores of principal component factors of 12 traits were calculated by weighting the eigenvalues of principal components.The order from high to low was Q020 > Zaode > Jiayi 200 > Xinyin 98-1 > American Century Red > Ruby > Hongguo No.3 > Qilin Diamond > Jiahehongyun.Among them, the comprehensive evaluation value of Q020 was the highest, which was 0.770.The comprehensive evaluation value of Jiahehongyun was the smallest, which was 0.329.【Conclusion】 Q020 has good growth indexes and good quality, which can be used as the main cultivar of processing tomato in Aral,Xinjiang.

Key words: processing tomato; principal component; membership function; agronomic traits

摘要：

【目的】筛选适合新疆阿拉尔市栽培的加工番茄品种。【方法】以9个加工番茄品种为材料,测定各加工番茄品种的株高、茎粗、叶面积、叶绿素相对含量、果形指数、单果重、可溶性固形物、可溶性糖含量、VC含量、番茄红素、总黄酮含量和可溶性蛋白含量等12项性状指标,进行主成分、隶属函数和聚类分析。【结果】提取加工番茄株高、可溶性固形物、VC含量、可溶性糖含量4个主成分,12个性状主成分因子的综合得分由高至低为Q020>早得>佳义200>新引98-1>美国世纪红>红宝石>红果三号>麒麟钻石>佳禾红运。其中Q020品种综合评价值最大,为0.770。佳禾红运品种的综合评价值最小,为0.329。【结论】Q020品种各项生长指标表现较好,品质较优,可作为新疆阿拉尔市加工番茄的主要栽培品种。

关键词: 加工番茄, 主成分, 隶属函数, 农艺性状

CLC Number:

S641.2

LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, SHU Sheng, MA Quanhui, HE Miao, DUAN Yifan, WU Hui. Comparative analysis of agronomic traits of different processing tomato varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(11): 2676-2683.

李春雨, 谭占明, 程云霞, 束胜, 马全会, 何淼, 段轶帆, 吴慧. 不同加工番茄品种的农艺性状比较分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(11): 2676-2683.

Figures/Tables 6

References 16

[1]	赵美佳, 邹通, 汤泽君, 等. 番茄营养成分以及国内外加工现状[J]. 食品研究与开发, 2016, 37(10): 215-218.
	ZHAO Meijia, ZOU Tong, TANG Zejun, et al. Nutritional ingredient of tomato and processing status in domestic and overseas[J]. Food Research and Development, 2016, 37(10): 215-218.
[2]	杨玉珍, 孟超然, 张新疆, 等. 氮、钾肥用量对膜下滴灌加工番茄产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017,(1): 61-67.
	YANG Yuzhen, MENG Chaoran, ZHANG Xinjiang, et al. Effect of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of processing tomato under drip irrigation with plastic film mulching[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017,(1): 61-67.
[3]	杨进, 严海欧, 张东, 等. 加工番茄农艺性状的主成分分析与综合评价[J]. 种子, 2020, 39(12): 80-84.
	YANG Jin, YAN Haiou, ZHANG Dong, et al. Principal component analysis(PCA) and comprehensive evaluation of agronomic traits of processed tomato[J]. Seed, 2020, 39(12): 80-84.
[4]	王亮, 李艳, 刘志刚, 等. 新疆加工番茄自交系产量与主要农艺性状关系的研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(6): 2517-2523.
	WANG Liang, LI Yan, LIU Zhigang, et al. Study on correlations between yield of processing tomato inbred lines and major characters in Xinjiang[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 27(6): 2517-2523.
[5]	李永清, 邱胤晖, 曾绍贵. 27份加工型番茄种质资源的聚类分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(3): 56-58.
	LI Yongqing, QIU Yinhui, ZENG Shaogui. Cluster analysis of 27 processing tomato germplasm resources[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(3): 56-58.
[6]	吕跃强. 温度对温室番茄生长产量和品质的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021.
[17]	李有福, 张欢欢, 段惠敏, 等. 河西荒漠绿洲区加工番茄果实品质综合评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 50(10): 125-134.
	LI Youfu, ZHANG Huanhuan, DUAN Huimin, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of processing tomato lines quality in Hexi Desert-oasis ecosystem region[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 50(10): 125-134.
[6]	LYU Yueqiang. The Influence of Temperature on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Tomato in Greenhouse[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2021.
[7]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI Hesheng. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[8]	陈刚, 李胜. 植物生理学实验[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2016.
	CHEN Gang, LI Sheng. Plant physiology experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2016.
[9]	Luo H, Li F S. Tomato yield, quality and water use efficiency under different drip fertigation strategies[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 235: 181-188.
[10]	张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导(3版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
	ZHANG Zhiliang, QU Weijing. The experimental guide for plant physiology(3rd ed)[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003.
[11]	张倩男. 基于表型性状及SSR、SNP标记的樱桃番茄种质资源遗传多样性分析[D]. 银川: 宁夏大学, 2018.
	ZHANG Qiannan. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Cherry Tomato Germplasm Resources Based on Morphological、SSR and SNP Markers[D]. Yinchuan: Ningxia University, 2018.
[12]	郑金凤, 米少艳, 婧姣姣, 等. 小麦代换系耐低磷生理性状的主成分分析及综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(10): 1984-1993. DOI
	ZHENG Jinfeng, MI Shaoyan, JING Jiaojiao, et al. Principal component analysis and comprehensive evaluation on physiological traits of tolerance to low phosphorus stress in wheat substitution[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(10): 1984-1993. DOI
[13]	于崧, 郭潇潇, 梁海芸, 等. 不同基因型绿豆萌发期耐盐碱性分析及其鉴定指标的筛选[J]. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(9): 1629-1639.
	YU Song, GUO Xiaoxiao, LIANG Haiyun, et al. Analysis of saline-alkaline tolerance and screening of identification indicators at the germination stage among different mung bean genotypes[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(9): 1629-1639.
[14]	程云霞, 谭占明, 熊仁次, 等. 南疆不同砧木组合对黄瓜生长发育及品质的影响[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(3): 80-89.
	CHENG Yunxia, TAN Zhanming, XIONG Renci, et al. Effects of different rootstock combinations on growth and quality of cucumbers in southern Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 42(3): 80-89.
[15]	程远, 万红建, 刘超超, 等. 十六个樱桃番茄品种果实风味品质相关指标比较分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(11): 1859-1869. DOI
	CHENG Yuan, WAN Hongjian, LIU Chaochao, et al. Comparative analysis of flavor/nutrient determination parameters in 16 different cherry tomato varieties[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(11): 1859-1869. DOI
[16]	黄敏, 布卡·欧尔娜, 宋梅, 等. 新疆奎屯垦区加工番茄品种多性状综合评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(19): 25-29. DOI
	HUANG Min, Buka Ouerna, SONG Mei, et al. Multiple traits of processing tomato varieties in Kuitun of Xinjiang: comprehensive evaluation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(19): 25-29. DOI

指标 Indexes	分量来源 Component source	主成分 Principal component
指标 Indexes	分量来源 Component source	主成分1 Principal component 1	主成分2 Principal component 2	主成分3 Principal component 3	主成分4 Principal component 4
特征值Eigen alue		4.225	2.551	2.117	1.436
贡献率Contribution rate(%)		35.208	21.261	17.638	11.968
累计贡献率The contribution rate(%)		35.208	56.47	74.108	86.076
特征向量 Eigenvector	株高	-0.449	0.016	0.074	-0.229
	茎粗	-0.259	0.248	0.326	0.219
	叶面积	0.311	-0.282	0.181	-0.411
	叶绿素相对含量	0.394	-0.183	0.016	0.338
	果形指数	-0.384	0.149	0.354	-0.002
	单果重	-0.333	-0.334	-0.255	0.068
	可溶性固形物	0.104	0.478	0.169	-0.438
	可溶性糖含量	0.015	0.475	-0.108	0.520
	VC含量	0.228	0.152	0.460	-0.001
	番茄红素	0.283	-0.131	0.410	0.238
	总黄酮含量	0.232	0.359	-0.304	-0.296
	可溶性蛋白含量	0.156	0.262	-0.389	0.066

指标 Indexes	分量来源 Component source	主成分 Principal component
指标 Indexes	分量来源 Component source	主成分1 Principal component 1	主成分2 Principal component 2	主成分3 Principal component 3	主成分4 Principal component 4
特征值Eigen alue		4.225	2.551	2.117	1.436
贡献率Contribution rate(%)		35.208	21.261	17.638	11.968
累计贡献率The contribution rate(%)		35.208	56.47	74.108	86.076
特征向量 Eigenvector	株高	-0.449	0.016	0.074	-0.229
	茎粗	-0.259	0.248	0.326	0.219
	叶面积	0.311	-0.282	0.181	-0.411
	叶绿素相对含量	0.394	-0.183	0.016	0.338
	果形指数	-0.384	0.149	0.354	-0.002
	单果重	-0.333	-0.334	-0.255	0.068
	可溶性固形物	0.104	0.478	0.169	-0.438
	可溶性糖含量	0.015	0.475	-0.108	0.520
	VC含量	0.228	0.152	0.460	-0.001
	番茄红素	0.283	-0.131	0.410	0.238
	总黄酮含量	0.232	0.359	-0.304	-0.296
	可溶性蛋白含量	0.156	0.262	-0.389	0.066

品种 Varieties	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	U(F₁)	U(F₂)	U(F₃)	U(F₄)	D值 D value	排名 Ranking
佳禾红运 Jiahehongyun	-3.113	-1.002	-0.074	1.446	0.000	0.340	0.516	1.000	0.329	9
Q020	3.419	0.086	0.363	0.688	1.000	0.529	0.594	0.779	0.770	1
早得 Zaode	1.838	2.783	-0.135	0.407	0.758	1.000	0.505	0.697	0.757	2
美国世纪红 American Century Red	-1.861	1.504	-0.236	1.406	0.192	0.777	0.487	0.988	0.508	5
新引98-1 Xinyin 98-1	-0.686	0.229	2.648	-0.877	0.371	0.555	1.000	0.322	0.539	4
红宝石 Ruby	-0.486	0.108	-0.496	-1.978	0.402	0.533	0.441	0.000	0.387	6
红果三号 Hongguo No.3	-1.282	0.031	0.131	-1.250	0.280	0.520	0.552	0.213	0.386	7
麒麟钻石 Qilin Diamond	0.426	-0.790	-2.975	-0.434	0.542	0.377	0.000	0.451	0.377	8
佳义200 Jiayi 200	1.744	-2.949	0.774	0.593	0.744	0.000	0.667	0.751	0.545	3
权重 Weights					0.409	0.247	0.205	0.139

品种 Varieties	F₁	F₂	F₃	F₄	U(F₁)	U(F₂)	U(F₃)	U(F₄)	D值 D value	排名 Ranking
佳禾红运 Jiahehongyun	-3.113	-1.002	-0.074	1.446	0.000	0.340	0.516	1.000	0.329	9
Q020	3.419	0.086	0.363	0.688	1.000	0.529	0.594	0.779	0.770	1
早得 Zaode	1.838	2.783	-0.135	0.407	0.758	1.000	0.505	0.697	0.757	2
美国世纪红 American Century Red	-1.861	1.504	-0.236	1.406	0.192	0.777	0.487	0.988	0.508	5
新引98-1 Xinyin 98-1	-0.686	0.229	2.648	-0.877	0.371	0.555	1.000	0.322	0.539	4
红宝石 Ruby	-0.486	0.108	-0.496	-1.978	0.402	0.533	0.441	0.000	0.387	6
红果三号 Hongguo No.3	-1.282	0.031	0.131	-1.250	0.280	0.520	0.552	0.213	0.386	7
麒麟钻石 Qilin Diamond	0.426	-0.790	-2.975	-0.434	0.542	0.377	0.000	0.451	0.377	8
佳义200 Jiayi 200	1.744	-2.949	0.774	0.593	0.744	0.000	0.667	0.751	0.545	3
权重 Weights					0.409	0.247	0.205	0.139

Comparative analysis of agronomic traits of different processing tomato varieties

不同加工番茄品种的农艺性状比较分析

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 16

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

[1]	TIAN Haiyan, ZHANG Zhanqin, XIE Jianhui, WANG Jianjiang, YANG Xiangkun. Study on the relationship between Lycopene and main quality characters of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2197-2202.
[2]	Areziguli Tuxun, GAO Jie. Effects of drought stress and planting density on physiological characteristics and yield of onion bulblets [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2211-2222.
[3]	CHEN Yong, ZHOU Lei, SUI Chun, LIN Caixia. The characteristics of 32 cultivated germplasms of Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus in Xinjiang production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314.
[4]	MIAO Yu, CHEN Cuixia, MA Yanming, XING Guofang, DONG Yusheng, CHEN Zhijun, WANG Xian, XIANG Li. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of 276 Central Asian barley germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895.
[5]	LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581.
[6]	YE Pingyi, LONG Yilei, TANG Yanping, DU Xiao, AN Mengjie, TAO Zhixin, LIANG Farui, AI Xiantao, HU Shoulin. Identification and evaluation of fruit branch angle and machine-picked agronomic traits in Gossypium hirsutum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1318-1327.
[7]	WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao. Evaluation of drought resistance of different Kazakhstan spring wheat at seeding stage under PEG-6000 stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
[8]	LIU Yue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, YU Yuehua, WANG Runqi, LI Dandan, SHI Shubing. Comparison of peanut varieties with different high oleic acid under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1361-1367.
[9]	GAO Mutian, XIAO Yanmei, LIAO Zhijie, HUANG Cheng. Comprehensive evaluation of kernel and quality traits in maize-teosinte introgression line population [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(4): 885-891.
[10]	YANG Minghua, LIAO Biyong, LIU Qiang, FENG Guorui, Dawulai Jiekeshan, Buayixiamu Namanti, LIU Qi, Aierjuma Tuluhan, PENG Yuncheng. Comprehensive evaluation of dehydration of maize hybrid combinations based on principal component analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 318-325.
[11]	YANG Xiangbo, CHEN Liangyu, YANG Songnan, CHEN Xifeng, XING Weiming, LI Xueying, CONG Weixuan, ZANG Zhenyuan, ZANG Yuanbo, ZHANG Jun. Phenotype analysis and comprehensive evaluation of spring soybean germplasm resources from northeast China [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2921-2933.
[12]	WANG Jianin, MAO Hongyan, YUE Li, Zulipiya Maimaiti, LYU Yuping, YU Ming. Principal component analysis and comparison of starch functional properties of rice cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2943-2953.
[13]	LI Chunyu, TAN Zhanming, CHENG Yunxia, GAO Yuan, MA Quanhui, LI Zhiguo, MA Xing. Effects of water and fertilizer coupling on diurnal changes of chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of sand-cultivated tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3006-3013.
[14]	LI Yali, Halihashi , TANG Yali, DUAN jingjing, LI Qingjun. Effect of NP reduction and K synergism on yield and nutrient absorption of processing tomato [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3014-3019.
[15]	XU Bin, WANG Zheng, SONG Zhanteng, Merhaba Paerhati, ZHU Jingrong, CHE Fengbin, LI Yonghai, WU Fengyan, MIAO Fuhong. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of the fruit quality of 11 wild seabuckthorn germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 3020-3031.