Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (6): 1352-1360.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.06.007
• Crop Genetics and Breeding • Germplasm Resources?Molecular Genetics • Cultivation Physiology • Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
Evaluation of drought resistance of different spring wheat germplasm introduced from Kazakhstan during seedling stage under 20% PEG stress
WANG Yizhao1(), YANG Qizhi1, LIU Yuxiu1(
), Alayi Nurkamali1, Vladimir Shvidchenko2, ZHANG Zhengmao1
Received:
2023-11-01
Online:
2024-06-20
Published:
2024-08-08
Correspondence author:
LIU Yuxiu
Supported by:
20%PEG胁迫下评价引进哈萨克斯坦不同春小麦种质苗期的抗旱性
王一钊1(), 杨其志1, 刘玉秀1(
), 阿拉依·努尔卡马力1, Vladimir Shvidchenko2, 张正茂1
通讯作者:
刘玉秀
作者简介:
王一钊(1998-),男,陕西西安人,硕士研究生,研究方向为作物遗传与种质创新,(E-mail)yzwang2022@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Yizhao, YANG Qizhi, LIU Yuxiu, Alayi Nurkamali, Vladimir Shvidchenko, ZHANG Zhengmao.
Evaluation of drought resistance of different spring wheat germplasm introduced from Kazakhstan during seedling stage under 20% PEG stress [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
王一钊, 杨其志, 刘玉秀, 阿拉依·努尔卡马力, Vladimir Shvidchenko, 张正茂.
20%PEG胁迫下评价引进哈萨克斯坦不同春小麦种质苗期的抗旱性 [J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1352-1360.
性状 Parameters | 处理 Treatments | 范围 Range | 均值±标准差 Average ±SE | 变异系数CV (%) | 增减 Increase or decrease (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽率Germination rate | CK | 24.00~90.67 | 71.45±16.50a | 23.09 | |
20% PEG | 10.67~87.33 | 55.52±19.99b | 36.01 | -22.30 | |
发芽势Germination potential | CK | 40.67~94.00 | 76.81±14.53a | 18.92 | |
20% PEG | 12.67~90.00 | 61.17±20.67b | 33.79 | -20.36 | |
根鲜重Root fresh weight | CK | 0.07~0.32 | 0.19±0.07a | 35.25 | |
20% PEG | 0.02~0.19 | 0.13±0.04b | 30.48 | -31.58 | |
根干重Root dry weight | CK | 0.02~0.05 | 0.03±0.01a | 31.62 | |
20% PEG | 0.03~0.07 | 0.05±0.01b | 31.51 | 66.67 | |
苗鲜重Shoot fresh weight | CK | 0.30 ~ 0.62 | 0.46±0.09a | 19.18 | |
20% PEG | 0.13~0.32 | 0.22±0.07b | 33.50 | -52.17 | |
苗干重Shoot dry weight | CK | 0.03~0.08 | 0.06±0.01a | 24.58 | |
20% PEG | 0.03~0.06 | 0.04±0.01b | 22.19 | -33.33 | |
根长Root length | CK | 7.18 ~ 20.77 | 14.41±6.35a | 24.85 | |
20% PEG | 5.08~14.43 | 9.85±2.80b | 28.46 | -31.64 | |
苗长Seedling length | CK | 3.58 ~ 18.95 | 11.59±3.58a | 30.89 | |
20% PEG | 6.27 ~ 12.88 | 9.47±2.23b | 23.60 | -18.29 |
Tab.1 Changes of germination characteristic of wheat in Kazakhstan under simulated drought stress with 20% PEG
性状 Parameters | 处理 Treatments | 范围 Range | 均值±标准差 Average ±SE | 变异系数CV (%) | 增减 Increase or decrease (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
发芽率Germination rate | CK | 24.00~90.67 | 71.45±16.50a | 23.09 | |
20% PEG | 10.67~87.33 | 55.52±19.99b | 36.01 | -22.30 | |
发芽势Germination potential | CK | 40.67~94.00 | 76.81±14.53a | 18.92 | |
20% PEG | 12.67~90.00 | 61.17±20.67b | 33.79 | -20.36 | |
根鲜重Root fresh weight | CK | 0.07~0.32 | 0.19±0.07a | 35.25 | |
20% PEG | 0.02~0.19 | 0.13±0.04b | 30.48 | -31.58 | |
根干重Root dry weight | CK | 0.02~0.05 | 0.03±0.01a | 31.62 | |
20% PEG | 0.03~0.07 | 0.05±0.01b | 31.51 | 66.67 | |
苗鲜重Shoot fresh weight | CK | 0.30 ~ 0.62 | 0.46±0.09a | 19.18 | |
20% PEG | 0.13~0.32 | 0.22±0.07b | 33.50 | -52.17 | |
苗干重Shoot dry weight | CK | 0.03~0.08 | 0.06±0.01a | 24.58 | |
20% PEG | 0.03~0.06 | 0.04±0.01b | 22.19 | -33.33 | |
根长Root length | CK | 7.18 ~ 20.77 | 14.41±6.35a | 24.85 | |
20% PEG | 5.08~14.43 | 9.85±2.80b | 28.46 | -31.64 | |
苗长Seedling length | CK | 3.58 ~ 18.95 | 11.59±3.58a | 30.89 | |
20% PEG | 6.27 ~ 12.88 | 9.47±2.23b | 23.60 | -18.29 |
Fig.1 Correlation analysis of wheat germination indexes under simulated drought stress under 20% PEG stress Note:,* significant difference at the P <0.05, ** significant difference at the P<0.05
因子 Factors | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率 Contribution (%) | 累积贡献 Cumulative contribution (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.30 | 41.25 | 41.25 |
2 | 1.65 | 20.57 | 61.82 |
3 | 1.51 | 13.88 | 75.70 |
4 | 1.10 | 10.73 | 86.43 |
Tab.2 Factor eigenvalues and contribution rates
因子 Factors | 特征值 Eigenvalue | 贡献率 Contribution (%) | 累积贡献 Cumulative contribution (%) |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 3.30 | 41.25 | 41.25 |
2 | 1.65 | 20.57 | 61.82 |
3 | 1.51 | 13.88 | 75.70 |
4 | 1.10 | 10.73 | 86.43 |
主因子 Principal factor | 发芽势 Germination potential | 发芽率 Germination rate | 根鲜重 Root fresh weight | 根干重 Root dry weight | 苗鲜重 Shoot fresh weight | 苗干重 Shoot dry weight | 根长 Root length | 苗长 Seedling length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.31 | 0.22 |
2 | -0.12 | -0.31 | -0.13 | -0.05 | 0.39 | 0.57 | -0.71 | 0.41 |
3 | -0.23 | 0.27 | -0.11 | -0.36 | -0.20 | 0.20 | 0.51 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.511 | 0.517 | -0.02 | 0.064 | -0.083 | -0.01 | -0.087 | -0.078 |
Tab.3 Loading matrix of main factors
主因子 Principal factor | 发芽势 Germination potential | 发芽率 Germination rate | 根鲜重 Root fresh weight | 根干重 Root dry weight | 苗鲜重 Shoot fresh weight | 苗干重 Shoot dry weight | 根长 Root length | 苗长 Seedling length |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 0.68 | 0.74 | 0.73 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.64 | 0.31 | 0.22 |
2 | -0.12 | -0.31 | -0.13 | -0.05 | 0.39 | 0.57 | -0.71 | 0.41 |
3 | -0.23 | 0.27 | -0.11 | -0.36 | -0.20 | 0.20 | 0.51 | 0.71 |
4 | 0.511 | 0.517 | -0.02 | 0.064 | -0.083 | -0.01 | -0.087 | -0.078 |
种质名称 Varieties | 苗鲜重Shoot fresh weight | 苗干重Shoot dry weight | 苗长Seedling length | 发芽率Germination rate | D | 排名 Rank | 等级 Class | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dc | Di | Dc | Di | Dc | Di | Dc | Di | ||||
19XS001 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 1.07 | 0.81 | 1 | A |
19XS003 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.23 | 0.80 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 2 | A |
19XS009 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 1.23 | 1.52 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 3 | A |
19XS004 | 0.64 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 1.56 | 0.69 | 4 | A |
19XS005-1 | 0.6 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.64 | 5 | A |
19XS0016 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.60 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 6 | B |
19XS0022 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 2.18 | 1.79 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 7 | B |
普冰151 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 1.76 | 2.33 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.57 | 8 | B |
19XS011 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 1.48 | 0.56 | 9 | B |
19XS0014 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 10 | B |
19XS0019 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 0.77 | 1.06 | 0.55 | 11 | B |
19XS005 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 12 | B |
19XS006 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 0.6 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 0.53 | 13 | B |
19XS0017 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.78 | 0.52 | 1.33 | 1.34 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 14 | B |
19XS0024 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.96 | 1.17 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 15 | B |
19XS010 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.6 | 0.46 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 16 | B |
19XS007 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 17 | B |
19XS0028 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.48 | 18 | B |
19XS0018 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 19 | B |
19XS0026 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.46 | 20 | B |
19XS0015 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.8 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 21 | B |
19XS0013 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.6 | 0.49 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 0.35 | 22 | B |
19XS0025 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 23 | C |
普冰322 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.42 | 1.94 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 24 | C |
19XS008 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 25 | C |
19XS0021 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.20 | 26 | C |
洛旱7号 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 27 | C |
19XS0020 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 28 | C |
范围Range | 0.27~0.88 | 0.16~1.23 | 0.54~1.76 | 0.39~2.33 | 0.44~2.18 | 0.32~1.94 | 0.24 ~0.99 | 0.11~1.48 | 0.10~0.81 | / | / |
平均±标准差 Average±SE | 0.48±0.14 | 0.51±0.25 | 0.76±0.23 | 0.78±0.36 | 0.89±0.35 | 0.91±0.42 | 0.63 ±0.20 | 0.69±0.40 | 0.48±0.19 | / | / |
变异系数CV | 29.41 | 50.18 | 30.05 | 46.16 | 38.98 | 45.46 | 35.23 | 38.96 | 56.48 | / | / |
Tab.4 Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of spring wheat germplasm in Kazakhstan at seedling stage
种质名称 Varieties | 苗鲜重Shoot fresh weight | 苗干重Shoot dry weight | 苗长Seedling length | 发芽率Germination rate | D | 排名 Rank | 等级 Class | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dc | Di | Dc | Di | Dc | Di | Dc | Di | ||||
19XS001 | 0.61 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 1.07 | 0.81 | 1 | A |
19XS003 | 0.88 | 1.23 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.95 | 1.23 | 0.80 | 1.01 | 0.75 | 2 | A |
19XS009 | 0.60 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 1.23 | 1.52 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 0.74 | 3 | A |
19XS004 | 0.64 | 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.76 | 0.89 | 0.98 | 1.56 | 0.69 | 4 | A |
19XS005-1 | 0.6 | 0.79 | 0.81 | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.88 | 0.49 | 0.43 | 0.64 | 5 | A |
19XS0016 | 0.62 | 0.89 | 0.82 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.60 | 0.53 | 0.60 | 0.61 | 6 | B |
19XS0022 | 0.79 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 2.18 | 1.79 | 0.43 | 0.33 | 0.61 | 7 | B |
普冰151 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 1.76 | 2.33 | 0.95 | 0.84 | 0.29 | 0.11 | 0.57 | 8 | B |
19XS011 | 0.56 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.91 | 1.48 | 0.56 | 9 | B |
19XS0014 | 0.48 | 0.52 | 0.71 | 0.76 | 1.12 | 1.13 | 0.71 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 10 | B |
19XS0019 | 0.52 | 0.62 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 0.77 | 1.06 | 0.55 | 11 | B |
19XS005 | 0.42 | 0.34 | 0.84 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 12 | B |
19XS006 | 0.38 | 0.31 | 0.72 | 0.6 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.99 | 1.33 | 0.53 | 13 | B |
19XS0017 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.78 | 0.52 | 1.33 | 1.34 | 0.29 | 0.18 | 0.51 | 14 | B |
19XS0024 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.96 | 1.17 | 0.89 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 15 | B |
19XS010 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.6 | 0.46 | 0.62 | 0.41 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.50 | 16 | B |
19XS007 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.44 | 0.53 | 0.43 | 0.49 | 17 | B |
19XS0028 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.76 | 0.85 | 0.78 | 0.63 | 0.74 | 0.79 | 0.48 | 18 | B |
19XS0018 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.67 | 0.57 | 0.82 | 0.73 | 0.67 | 0.72 | 0.48 | 19 | B |
19XS0026 | 0.54 | 0.65 | 0.88 | 1.12 | 0.85 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.74 | 0.46 | 20 | B |
19XS0015 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.8 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.42 | 21 | B |
19XS0013 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.6 | 0.49 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 1.07 | 0.35 | 22 | B |
19XS0025 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.64 | 0.77 | 0.76 | 0.73 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.25 | 23 | C |
普冰322 | 0.35 | 0.28 | 0.62 | 0.66 | 1.42 | 1.94 | 0.24 | 0.10 | 0.24 | 24 | C |
19XS008 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.64 | 0.56 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.38 | 0.23 | 25 | C |
19XS0021 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.61 | 0.63 | 0.62 | 0.57 | 0.57 | 0.53 | 0.20 | 26 | C |
洛旱7号 | 0.27 | 0.16 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.73 | 0.69 | 0.58 | 0.42 | 0.11 | 27 | C |
19XS0020 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 0.39 | 0.56 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.30 | 0.10 | 28 | C |
范围Range | 0.27~0.88 | 0.16~1.23 | 0.54~1.76 | 0.39~2.33 | 0.44~2.18 | 0.32~1.94 | 0.24 ~0.99 | 0.11~1.48 | 0.10~0.81 | / | / |
平均±标准差 Average±SE | 0.48±0.14 | 0.51±0.25 | 0.76±0.23 | 0.78±0.36 | 0.89±0.35 | 0.91±0.42 | 0.63 ±0.20 | 0.69±0.40 | 0.48±0.19 | / | / |
变异系数CV | 29.41 | 50.18 | 30.05 | 46.16 | 38.98 | 45.46 | 35.23 | 38.96 | 56.48 | / | / |
等级 Classes | 发芽势 Germination potential | 发芽率 Germination rate | 根鲜重 Root fresh weight | 苗鲜重 Shoot fresh weight | 根干重 Root dry weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 98.17±4.02a | 92.19±10.22a | 0.17±0.03a | 0.28±0.03a | 0.04±0.01a |
B | 95.89±15.08a | 79.83±7.94b | 0.13±0.04b | 0.21±0.04b | 0.05±0.01a |
C | 78.56±28.77a | 54.70±6.08c | 0.12±0.04b | 0.17±0.04b | 0.05±0.01a |
等级Classes | 苗干重 Shoot dry weight | 根长 Root length | 苗长 Seedling length | / | / |
A | 0.04±0.00a | 9.83±1.16a | 11.09±1.27a | / | / |
B | 0.04±0.01a | 10.22±2.30a | 9.07±1.62b | / | / |
C | 0.03±0.01a | 8.33±2.10a | 8.41±1.25b | / | / |
Tab.5 Changes of differenceofeachindexamongdrought-resistantpopulations
等级 Classes | 发芽势 Germination potential | 发芽率 Germination rate | 根鲜重 Root fresh weight | 苗鲜重 Shoot fresh weight | 根干重 Root dry weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 98.17±4.02a | 92.19±10.22a | 0.17±0.03a | 0.28±0.03a | 0.04±0.01a |
B | 95.89±15.08a | 79.83±7.94b | 0.13±0.04b | 0.21±0.04b | 0.05±0.01a |
C | 78.56±28.77a | 54.70±6.08c | 0.12±0.04b | 0.17±0.04b | 0.05±0.01a |
等级Classes | 苗干重 Shoot dry weight | 根长 Root length | 苗长 Seedling length | / | / |
A | 0.04±0.00a | 9.83±1.16a | 11.09±1.27a | / | / |
B | 0.04±0.01a | 10.22±2.30a | 9.07±1.62b | / | / |
C | 0.03±0.01a | 8.33±2.10a | 8.41±1.25b | / | / |
[1] | 赵海燕, 张文千, 邹旭恺, 等. 气候变化背景下中国农业干旱时空变化特征分析[J]. 中国农业气象, 2021, 42(1): 69-79. |
ZHAO Haiyan, ZHANG Wenqian, ZOU Xukai, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of drought in China under climate change[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2021, 42(1): 69-79. | |
[2] | 王利民, 刘佳, 张有智, 等. 我国农业干旱灾害时空格局分析[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2021, 42(1): 96-105. |
WANG Limin, LIU Jia, ZHANG Youzhi, et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of agricultural drought disaster in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2021, 42(1): 96-105. | |
[3] | 张棋, 许德合, 丁严. 基于SPEI和时空立方体的中国近40年干旱时空模式挖掘[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(3): 194-201. |
ZHANG Qi, XU Dehe, DING Yan. Spatio-temporal pattern mining of the last 40 years of drought in China based on SPEI index and spatio-temporal cube[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(3): 194-201. | |
[4] | 白金顺, 王雪翠, 王艳秋. 箭筈豌豆种质资源萌发期抗旱指标筛选及抗旱性评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2253-2263. |
BAI Jinshun, WANG Xuecui, WANG Yanqiu. Screening of drought-resistance index and drought-resistance evaluation of common vetch(Vicia sativa L.) germplasms at germination stage[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2253-2263. | |
[5] |
李龙, 毛新国, 王景一, 等. 小麦种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 作物学报, 2018, 44(7): 988-999.
DOI |
LI Long, MAO Xinguo, WANG Jingyi, et al. Drought tolerance evaluation of wheat germplasm resources[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2018, 44(7): 988-999.
DOI |
|
[6] | 任毅, 颜安, 张芳, 等. 国内外301份小麦品种(系)种子萌发期抗旱性鉴定及评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(3): 1-14. |
REN Yi, YAN An, ZHANG Fang, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought tolerance of 301 wheatvarieties (lines) at germination stage[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(3): 1-14. | |
[7] | 王兰芬, 武晶, 彭琳, 等. 绿豆种质资源抗旱性鉴定评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(5): 1141-1150. |
WANG Lanfen, WU Jing, PENG Lin, et al. Evaluation for drought-tolerance germplasm resource in mungbean[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(5): 1141-1150.
DOI |
|
[8] | 王秀华, 于鸿翔, 孙福来, 等. 小麦萌发期抗旱和耐盐性状的QTL分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2020, 40(2): 240-251. |
WANG Xiuhua, YU Hongxiang, SUN Fulai, et al. QTL mapping of drought and salt tolerant traits in wheat at germination stage[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2020, 40(2): 240-251. | |
[9] | 王优信, 延荣, 蔺明月, 等. 冀中北小麦品种抗旱性筛选研究[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(1): 74-82. |
WANG Youxin, YAN Rong, LIN Mingyue, et al. Screening for drought-resistant wheat varieties in northern central area of Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(1): 74-82. | |
[10] | Sallam A, Alqudah A M, Dawood M F A, et al. Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(13): 3137. |
[11] | 孙可蒙, 隋晓青, 王玉祥, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫下12份新疆野生无芒雀麦种质萌发期抗旱性评价[J]. 草原与草坪, 2020, 40(6): 102-107, 117. |
SUN Kemeng, SUI Xiaoqing, WANG Yuxiang, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance for 12 Bromus inermis germplasms in Xinj iang under PEG stress at germination stage[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2020, 40(6): 102-107, 117. | |
[12] | 施成晓, 陈婷, 王昌江, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同抗旱性小麦种子萌发及幼苗根芽生物量分配的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(4): 483-490. |
SHI Chengxiao, CHEN Ting, WANG Changjiang, et al. Effect of drought stress on seed germination and biomass allocation of root and shoot of different drought resistant wheat cultivars[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(4): 483-490. | |
[13] | 冯举伶, 姚立蓉, 汪军成, 等. 119份春小麦种质萌发期抗旱性鉴定及抗旱相关基因表达特性分析[J/OL]. 麦类作物学报 2022, (3), 2021: 1-11. (2021-11-23). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1359.S.20211123.1132.026.html. |
FENG Juling, YAO Lirong, WANG Juncheng, et al.Drought resistance identification and drought-resistance related gene expression analysis of 119 spring wheat germplasms at germination stage[J/OL]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021: 1-11. (2021-11-23). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/61.1359.S.20211123.1132.026.html. | |
[14] |
王敬东, 马斯霜, 白海波, 等. PEG胁迫下春小麦萌发期抗旱指标的遗传力[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(28): 6-12.
DOI |
WANG Jingdong, MA Sishuang, BAI Haibo, et al. Genetic ability of drought resistance indexes of spring wheat at germination stage under PEG stress[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(28): 6-12.
DOI |
|
[15] | 王志恒, 邹芳, 杨秀柳, 等. PEG-6000模拟干旱对春小麦种子萌发的影响[J]. 种子, 2019, 38(7): 12-17. |
WANG Zhiheng, ZOU Fang, YANG Xiuliu, et al. Effects of PEG-6000 on seed germination of spring wheat under simulated drought conditions[J]. Seed, 2019, 38(7): 12-17. | |
[16] | 田又升, 谢宗铭, 吴向东, 等. 水稻种质资源萌发期抗旱性综合鉴定[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015, 33(4): 173-180. |
TIAN Yousheng, XIE Zongming, WU Xiangdong, et al. Identification of drought tolerance of rice germplasm during germination period[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2015, 33(4): 173-180. | |
[17] | 成锴, 苏晓慧, 栗建枝, 等. PEG-6000胁迫下玉米品种萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 玉米科学, 2017, 25(5): 85-90. |
CHENG Kai, SU Xiaohui, LI Jianzhi, et al. Identification and evaluation of maize drought resistance under PEG-6000 stress at germination stage[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2017, 25(5): 85-90. | |
[18] | 柏晓玲, 周青平, 陈仕勇, 等. PEG模拟干旱胁迫对6种燕麦品种种子萌发的影响[J]. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 41(2): 133-137. |
BAI Xiaoling, ZHOU Qingping, CHEN Shiyong, et al. Effects of PEG simulated drought stress on seed germination of six oat cultivars[J]. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 41(2): 133-137. | |
[19] | 郝俊峰, 张玉霞, 贾玉山, 等. PEG-6000胁迫下苜蓿萌发期抗旱性鉴定与评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(11): 23-32. |
HAO Junfeng, ZHANG Yuxia, JIA Yushan, et al. Identification and evaluation of drought resistance of alfalfa at germination stage under PEG-6000 stress[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 48(11): 23-32. | |
[20] | 张芳, 颜安, 任毅, 等. 新疆冬小麦萌发期抗旱性综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(1): 100-112. |
ZHANG Fang, YAN An, REN Yi, et al. Evaluation on drought resistance of winter wheat cultivars in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(1): 100-112. | |
[21] | 张树林, 刘玉玲, 田丽, 等. 不同小麦新品系萌发期抗旱性的筛选与鉴定[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(21): 7138-7147. |
ZHANG Shulin, LIU Yuling, TIAN Li, et al. Screening and identification of drought resistance of different new wheat lines during germination period[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(21): 7138-7147. | |
[22] |
赵佳佳, 乔玲, 武棒棒, 等. 山西省小麦苗期根系性状及抗旱特性分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4): 714-727.
DOI |
ZHAO Jiajia, QIAO Ling, WU Bangbang, et al. Seedling root characteristics and drought resistance of wheat in Shanxi Province[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(4): 714-727.
DOI |
|
[23] | Li L, Mao X G, Wang J Y, et al. Genetic dissection of drought and heat-responsive agronomic traits in wheat[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2019, 42(9): 2540-2553. |
[24] | 汪妤, 李红霞, 张畅通. 小麦种质资源苗期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国科技论文, 2017, 12(12): 1364-1370. |
WANG Yu, LI Hongxia, ZHANG Changtong. Drought-resistance evaluation on wheat germplasm at seedling stage[J]. China Sciencepaper, 2017, 12(12): 1364-1370. | |
[25] | 陈卫国, 张政, 史雨刚, 等. 211份小麦种质资源抗旱性的评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020,(4): 53-63. |
CHEN Weiguo, ZHANG Zheng, SHI Yugang, et al. Drought-tolerance evaluation of 211 wheat germplasm resources[J]. Crops, 2020,(4): 53-63. | |
[26] |
王永刚, 张胜军, 刘亚丽, 等. 新疆冬小麦品种资源萌发期耐旱性鉴定与筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2024-2034.
DOI |
WANG Yonggang, ZHANG Shengjun, LIU Yali, et al. Identification and screening of drought tolerance in winter wheat cultivars in Xinjiang during germination period[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2024-2034.
DOI |
|
[27] |
张一铎, 胡立芹, 张明, 等. 405份CIMMYT引进小麦种质的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(5): 961-967.
DOI |
ZHANG Yiduo, HU Liqin, ZHANG Ming, et al. Genetic diversity of 405 wheat lines from CIMMYT[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(5): 961-967.
DOI |
|
[28] | 曾潮武, 梁晓东, 李建疆. 中亚引进春小麦种质资源主要农艺性状的遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017,(2): 67-71. |
ZENG Chaowu, LIANG Xiaodong, LI Jianjiang. Genetic diversity analysis on main characters of spring wheat germplasms in central Asia[J]. Crops, 2017,(2): 67-71. | |
[29] |
Shavrukov Y, Zhumalin A, Serikbay D, et al. Expression level of the DREB2-type gene, identified with amplifluor SNP markers, correlates with performance, and tolerance to dehydration in bread wheat cultivars from northern Kazakhstan[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 1736.
PMID |
[30] | 张达斌, 黄文凤, 惠蕾, 等. PEG胁迫下旱地油菜绿肥苗期抗旱性筛选和评价[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(1): 168-180. |
ZHANG Dabin, HUANG Wenfeng, HUI Lei, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of Brassica green manure crops using seedling growth indices[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(1): 168-180. | |
[31] | 聂志刚, 任新庄, 李广, 等. 基于APSIM的甘肃春小麦干旱致灾风险评价[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(6): 194-200. |
NIE Zhigang, REN Xinzhuang, LI Guang, et al. Assessment of drought risk on spring wheat in Gansu using APSIM[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(6): 194-200. | |
[32] |
齐月, 王鹤龄, 张凯, 等. 气候变化对黄土高原半干旱区春小麦生长和产量的影响——以定西市为例[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(7): 1313-1321.
DOI |
QI Yue, WANG Heling, ZHANG Kai, et al. Effects of climate change on growth and yield of spring wheat in semi-arid region of the Loess Plateau: a case study of Dingxi city[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(7): 1313-1321. | |
[33] | 祁嘉郁, 巴特尔·巴克. 基于水分亏缺指数的北疆春小麦不同生育阶段干旱时空特征[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(4): 171-178. |
QI Jiayu, Bteer Bake. Temporal and spatial characteristics of drought in different growth stages of spring wheat in northern Xinjiang based on crop water deficit index[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39(4): 171-178. | |
[34] |
张龑, 王永刚, 肖菁, 等. 引进春小麦品种(系)芽期抗旱性评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(12): 2186-2196.
DOI |
ZHANG Yan, WANG Yonggang, XIAO Jing, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of introduced spring wheat varieties (lines) at bud stage[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(12): 2186-2196.
DOI |
|
[35] |
Qayyum A, Al Ayoubi S, Sher A, et al. Improvement in drought tolerance in bread wheat is related to an improvement in osmolyte production, antioxidant enzyme activities, and gaseous exchange[J]. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2021, 28(9): 5238-5249.
DOI PMID |
[36] | 吴妍, 张岁岐, 刘小芳, 等. 水分胁迫及复水条件下外源Ca2+对玉米幼苗根系水力导度及生长的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2010, 36(6): 1044-1049. |
WU Yan, ZHANG Suiqi, LIU Xiaofang, et al. Effect of calcium on maize seedling root hydraulic conductivity and growth under water stress and rehydration conditions[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2010, 36(6): 1044-1049. |
[1] | CHEN Hui, ZHANG Yongqiang, BI Haiyan, TANJun , CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, YU Jianxin, LU Dong, LEI Junjie. Yield formation characteristics of different spring wheat varieties in dryland farming area of Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 13-20. |
[2] | WANG Zijian, LI Liulong, ZHAO Yanhui, XU Linfeng, QIU Zhizhong, LI Zhaofeng, LEI Junjie, WANG Xiao, WAN Wenliang, JIANG Dong. Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on canopy structure and photosynthetic rate of slope drip irrigated spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 75-86. |
[3] | LI Na, LYU Caixia, Xin Huinan, LI Yongfu, LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on the characteristics and root zone soil nutrients of drip irrigation wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(1): 87-94. |
[4] | GAO Min, SUN Zhaozhan, ZHAO Xiaomeng, HU Lingling, Jiayina , KONG Fanyang, LIU yuan, YANG Haoran, GUO Chunmiao, YAO Yanling. Practice and reflection on cultivating high level talents to enhance the technological innovation capability of agricultural research institutes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 191-195. |
[5] | WANG Chunsheng, LI Jianfeng, ZHANG Yueqiang, FAN Zheru, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, XIA Jianqiang, WANG Fangping, ZHAO Qi. Study on genotypic differences of anther culture ability in mainly cultivated spring wheat varieties in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2081-2086. |
[6] | ZENG Wanying, GENG Hongwei, CHENG Yukun, LI Sizhong, QIAN Songting, GAO Weishi, ZHANG Liming. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance during the rapid growth stage of sugar beet cultivars [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2140-2151. |
[7] | CHEN Yong, ZHOU Lei, SUI Chun, LIN Caixia. The characteristics of 32 cultivated germplasms of Isatis tinctoria Linnaeus in Xinjiang production area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2307-2314. |
[8] | LI Jinyao, XU Guiqing, WANG Lisheng, LU Ping, SHI Dongfang, ZHENG Weihua. Study on the effect of N fertilization on drought resistance of Calligonum caput-medusae seedlings [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2330-2340. |
[9] | YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[10] | YUAN Yilin, YAN An, ZUO Xiaoxiao, HOU Zhengqing, ZHANG Zhenfei, XIAO Shuting, SUN Zhe, MA Mengqian, ZHAO Yuhang. Impact of reduced nitrogen fertilization combined with bio-organic fertilizer on spring wheat yield enhancement and soil enrichment [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1872-1882. |
[11] | LIU Xuhuan, YU Shan, LIU Yue, SHI Shubing. Comparative on the vigor differences of spring wheat seeds of different sizes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1883-1887. |
[12] | MIAO Yu, CHEN Cuixia, MA Yanming, XING Guofang, DONG Yusheng, CHEN Zhijun, WANG Xian, XIANG Li. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of 276 Central Asian barley germplasm resources [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1888-1895. |
[13] | LIU Huijie, WANG Junhao, GONG Zhaolong, LIANG Yajun, WANG Junduo, LI Xueyuan, ZHENG Juyun, WANG Jichuan. Identification of salt tolerance of 197 upland cotton varieties at germination stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1574-1581. |
[14] | YANG Mei, ZHAO Hongmei, Dilireba Xiamixiding, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Jinshan, HUI Chao. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
[15] | ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Lihong, SHI Jia, KONG Depeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, LI Jianfeng, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru, ZHANG Yueqiang. Effects of soil moisture on leaf protective enzyme activities and yield of spring wheat cultivars with different drought resistance [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1041-1047. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 57
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 208
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||