Effects of Different Rootstock Grafting on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Flame Seedless

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.010

Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (1): 79-85.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.01.010

• Horticultural Special Local Products • Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Different Rootstock Grafting on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Flame Seedless

DING Xiang¹^,²(), XIAN He³, ZHOU Xiaoming², ZHANG Fuchun², HU Xin¹^,², PAN Mingqi², ZHONG Haixia²(), ZENG Bin¹(), WU Xinyu²

1. College of Forestry & Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2. Institute of Horticultural Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830091,China
3. Comprehensive Experiment Station of Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830000, China

Received:2022-06-03 Online:2023-01-20 Published:2023-03-07
Correspondence author: ZHONG Haixia (1988-), female, associate research fellow, master, research direction: Viticulture Physiology and quality control,(E-mail)zhonghaixia1@sina.cn;ZENG Bin (1970-), male, professor, doctoral supervisor, whose research interest covers fruit germplasm resources and fruit cultivation physiology, (E-mail)zbxnd@163.com
Supported by:
National Natural Science Foundation of China(31960575);Excellent Young Scientific and Technological Talents Training Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region(2020Q028);China Agriculture Research System(CARS-29-ZP-08)

不同砧木对火焰无核葡萄生长、产量及品质的影响

丁祥¹^,²(), 仙鹤³, 周晓明², 张付春², 胡鑫¹^,², 潘明启², 钟海霞²(), 曾斌¹(), 伍新宇²

1.新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院,乌鲁木齐 830052
2.新疆农业科学院园艺作物研究所,乌鲁木齐 830091
3.新疆农业科学院综合试验场,乌鲁木齐 830000

通讯作者: 钟海霞(1988-),女,河南人,副研究员,硕士,研究方向为葡萄栽培生理与品质调控,(E-mail)zhonghaixia1@sina.cn;曾斌(1970-),男,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向为果树种质资源及果树栽培生理,(E-mail)zbxnd@163.com
作者简介:丁祥(1997-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向为葡萄栽培生理与品质调控,(E-mail)dingxiang08@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(31960575);自治区优秀青年科技人才培养(2020Q028);现代农业产业技术体系专项资金(CARS-29-ZP-08)

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To study the effects of different rootstocks on the growth, yield and quality of flame-seedless grape and provide a scientific basis for the dominant flame-seedless grafting combination in Xinjiang cultivation. 【Methods】 5 kinds of grafting the scion of 6 a flame seedless grapes 5BB, 11R, 101-14MG, SO4 and the 188-08 were taken as test materials, flame seedless self-roots were used as a control to determine such quality indicators as the fruit grain weight, spike weight, color, soluble solids content, titratable acid during the whole growth cycle in the field development and production. 【Result】 The results showed that the growth, yield and fruit quality of different grafting combinations were significantly or extremely significantly improved compared with the flame seedless self-rooted seedlings.Flame seedless/101-14MG promoted the early ripening of Flame seedless grape and its fruit weight was the largest, the fruit color the best, the soluble solid content and the ratio of solid to acid the highest. 【Conclusion】 The 101-14MG rootstock grafted with flame-seedless grape has the advantages of early maturity, high yield, good coloring and high soluble solid content, and is the best rootstock for flame-seedless grape among the five kinds of rootstock and ear combinations.

Key words: rootstock; Flame seedless; growth; yield; fruit quality

摘要：

【目的】研究不同砧木对火焰无核葡萄生长、产量和品质的影响,为新疆地区栽培优势火焰无核嫁接组合提供科学依据。【方法】以5BB、110R、101-14MG、SO4、188-08等5种砧木嫁接的6a生火焰无核葡萄为试材,火焰无核自根为对照,分析其在田间整个生长周期中树体的生长、产量及发育状况,测定果实色差、粒重、穗重、可滴定酸、可溶性固形物含量等品质指标。【结果】不同嫁接组合葡萄相较于火焰无核自根苗在生长、产量和果实品质均显著或极显著提高。其中火焰无核/101-14MG 更能促进火焰无核葡萄早熟。且果实粒重最大,果实着色最好,可溶性固形物含量,固酸比最高。【结论】以101-14MG为砧木嫁接的火焰无核葡萄具有成熟期早、着色好、产量高、可溶性固形物含量高等优点,是5种砧穗组合中最适宜火焰无核葡萄的优良砧木。

关键词: 砧木, 火焰无核, 生长, 产量, 果实品质

CLC Number:

S663.1

DING Xiang, XIAN He, ZHOU Xiaoming, ZHANG Fuchun, HU Xin, PAN Mingqi, ZHONG Haixia, ZENG Bin, WU Xinyu. Effects of Different Rootstock Grafting on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Flame Seedless[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 79-85.

丁祥, 仙鹤, 周晓明, 张付春, 胡鑫, 潘明启, 钟海霞, 曾斌, 伍新宇. 不同砧木对火焰无核葡萄生长、产量及品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(1): 79-85.

Figures/Tables 9

References 19

[1]	王爱玲, 蔡军社, 白世践, 等. 喷施不同浓度油菜素内酯对"火焰无核"葡萄生理特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2019, (5): 61-64.
	WANG Ailing, CAI Junshe, BAI Shijian, et al. Effects of different concentrations of brassinolide on physiological characteristics of "Flame-seedless" grape[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2019,(5): 61-64.
[2]	Pinillos V, Sonia Ibáez, Jéssica M,. Cunha J M, et al. Postveraison Deficit Irrigation Effects on Fruit Quality and Yield of "Flame Seedless" Table Grape Cultivated under Greenhouse and Net[J]. Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, 9(11):1437. DOI URL
[3]	Khalil H. Improved Yield, Fruit Quality, and Shelf Life in ‘Flame Seedless’ Grapevine with Pre-Harvest Foliar Applications[J]. Journal of Horticultural Research, 2020, 28(1):77-86. DOI URL
[4]	牛铁荃, 郭雯岩, 李雪雪, 等. 葡萄砧木实生苗的抗寒性评价[J]. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40 (6): 29-37.
	NIU Tiequan, GUO Wenyan, LI Xuexue, et al. Evaluation of cold resistance of grape rootstock seedlings[J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2020, 40 (6): 29-37.
[5]	孙茜, 任磊, 马文婷, 等. 四种葡萄砧木抗旱性的鉴定[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(3): 623-626.
	SUN Qian, REN Lei, MA Wengting, et al. Identification of drought resistance of four grape rootstocks[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 54(3): 623-626.
[6]	付晴晴, 孙鲁龙, 翟衡, 等. 葡萄种间杂交砧木育种F₁代植株耐盐性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52 (6): 733-743. DOI
	FU Qinqin, SUN Lulong, ZHAI Heng, et al. Analysis of salt tolerance of F₁ generation grape interspecific hybrid rootstock breeding[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(6): 733-743.
[7]	牛锐敏, 许泽华, 黄小晶, 等. 砧木对‘赤霞珠’葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2020, 35(1): 124-129.
	NIU Ruiming, XU Zehua, HUANG Xiaojing, et al. Effects of rootstocks on grape growth and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2020, 35 (1): 124-129.
[8]	范宗民, 孙军利, 赵宝龙, 等. 不同砧木‘赤霞珠’葡萄枝条抗寒性比较[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(2): 215-225.
	FAN Zongmin, SUN Junli, ZHAO Baolong, et al. Comparison of cold resistance of different rootstocks' Cabernet Sauvignon 'grape branches[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(2): 215-225.
[9]	刘竞择, 曹柠, 张艳霞, 等. 葡萄砧木冬季抗抽干能力及抗旱性综合评价[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37 (3): 339-349.
	LIU Jinze, CAO Ning, ZHANG Yanxia, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of winter drought-resistance and drought-resistance of grape rootstocks[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37 (3): 339-349.
[10]	于昕, 岳倩宇, 于梦, 等. 复合盐碱处理下葡萄砧木SA15、SA17和1103P的生理响应分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56 (1): 57-65.
	YU Xin, YUE Qianyu, YU Meng, et al. Physiological response analysis of grape rootstocks SA15, SA17 and 1103P under combined saline-alkali treatment[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2020, 56(1): 57-65.
[11]	魏灵珠, 沈碧薇, 程建徽, 等. 砧木对‘新雅’葡萄生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37 (9): 1346-1357.
	WEI Linzhu, SHEN Biwei, CHENG Jianhui, et al. Effects of rootstock on growth and fruit quality of 'Xinya' grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(9): 1346-1357.
[12]	刘崇怀, 沈育杰, 陈俊. 葡萄种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
	LIU Chonghuai, SHEN Yujie, CHEN Jun. Specification and data standard of grape germplasm resources description[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006.
[13]	龚林忠, 刘勇, 何华平, 等. SO4和贝达砧木对申丰葡萄的影响[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015,(4): 77-79.
	GONG Linzhong, LIU Yong, HE Huaping, et al. Effects of SO4 and Beida rootstocks on Shenfeng grape[J]. Fruit Science in South China, 2015,(4): 77-79.
[14]	崔鹏飞, 魏灵珠, 程建徽, 等. 不同砧木对天工翠玉葡萄生长和果实品质的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2021, 33 (1): 52-61. DOI
	CUI Pengfei, WEI Lingzhu, CHENG Jianhui, et al. Effects of different rootstocks on growth and fruit quality of Tiangong Cuiseyu grape[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2021, 33 (1): 52-61. DOI
[15]	钟海霞, 潘明启, 张付春, 等. 7种砧木对克瑞森无核葡萄生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53 (10): 1786-1793.
	ZHONG Haixia, PAN Mingqi, ZHANG Fuchun, et al. Effects of 7 rootstocks on growth, yield and quality of Krishen seedless grape[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(10): 1786-1793.
[16]	Jin X, Sun H, Sun T Y, et al. Modifications of 'Gold Finger' grape berry quality as affected by the different rootstocks[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 210(21): 130-137. DOI URL
[17]	Suriano S, Alba V, Gennaro D D, et al. Genotype/ rootstocks effect on the expression of anthocyanins and flavans in grapes and wines of Greco Neron.(Vitis vinifera L.)[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2016, 209: 309-315. DOI URL
[18]	Dahal S. Rootstock-Scion Relationship in Fruit Crops[J]. Science for Agriculture and Allied Sector, 2021, 2(11): 10-16.
[19]	张向前, 解新明. 颇具争议的获得性遗传及其对生物学教学的启示[J]. 生物学教学, 2018, 43 (9): 74-75.
	ZHANG Xiangqian, XIE Xinming. The controversial acquired heredity and its implications for biology teaching[J]. Biology Teaching, 2018, 43(9): 74-75.

类型 Type	新梢成熟节位 Mature node position of shoot	枝条粗度 (纵径/横径) Branch thickness (Longituclinal cliameter/ Transverse diameter)	大小脚现象 Feet pheno menon	单株果穗数 Ears per plant
5BB	9.25±1.37^aA	0.94±0.24^aA	有	41
110R	3.83±0.42^bB	1.01±0.35^aA	无	25
101-14MG	9.67±0.44^aA	0.93±0.05^aA	无	36
SO4	5.13±0.69^bB	1.05±0.54^aA	有	23
188-08	11.83±1.58^aA	1.00±0.03^aA	有	16
自根苗 Self rooted seedling	8.74±0.13^aA	0.89±0.22^aA	无	21

类型 Type	新梢成熟节位 Mature node position of shoot	枝条粗度 (纵径/横径) Branch thickness (Longituclinal cliameter/ Transverse diameter)	大小脚现象 Feet pheno menon	单株果穗数 Ears per plant
5BB	9.25±1.37^aA	0.94±0.24^aA	有	41
110R	3.83±0.42^bB	1.01±0.35^aA	无	25
101-14MG	9.67±0.44^aA	0.93±0.05^aA	无	36
SO4	5.13±0.69^bB	1.05±0.54^aA	有	23
188-08	11.83±1.58^aA	1.00±0.03^aA	有	16
自根苗 Self rooted seedling	8.74±0.13^aA	0.89±0.22^aA	无	21

砧木 Rootstock	穗重 Panicle weight (g)	果穗纵径 Ear longitudinal diameter(mm)	果穗横径 Ear diameter (mm)	穗形指数 Ear shape index
5BB	461.76±17.53^aA	304.98±7.45^abA	201.93±16.39^abcAB	1.53±0.09^aAB
110R	471.63±20.19^aA	286.06±20.12^abA	186.90±8.82^bcAB	1.54±0.15^aA
101-14MG	518.31±51.26^aA	304.12±10.47^abA	209.16±6.19^abAB	1.45±0.03^aAB
SO4	515.24±27.17^aA	316.65±29.32^aA	214.23±10.55^abAB	1.48±0.15^aAB
188-08	431.57±21.87^aA	238.37±21.27^bA	229.60±3.93^aA	1.04±0.08^bB
自根苗Self rooted seedling	423.71±38.36^aA	244.79±30.34^abA	171.11±13.55^cB	1.42±0.06^aAB

砧木 Rootstock	穗重 Panicle weight (g)	果穗纵径 Ear longitudinal diameter(mm)	果穗横径 Ear diameter (mm)	穗形指数 Ear shape index
5BB	461.76±17.53^aA	304.98±7.45^abA	201.93±16.39^abcAB	1.53±0.09^aAB
110R	471.63±20.19^aA	286.06±20.12^abA	186.90±8.82^bcAB	1.54±0.15^aA
101-14MG	518.31±51.26^aA	304.12±10.47^abA	209.16±6.19^abAB	1.45±0.03^aAB
SO4	515.24±27.17^aA	316.65±29.32^aA	214.23±10.55^abAB	1.48±0.15^aAB
188-08	431.57±21.87^aA	238.37±21.27^bA	229.60±3.93^aA	1.04±0.08^bB
自根苗Self rooted seedling	423.71±38.36^aA	244.79±30.34^abA	171.11±13.55^cB	1.42±0.06^aAB

砧木 Rootstock	单粒重 Single grain weight(g)	果粒纵径 Vertical diameter of grain(mm)	果粒横径 Fruit grain diameter(mm)	果形指数 Fruit shape index
5BB	3.31±0.11^bAB	17.57±0.43^bB	16.12±0.20^cBC	1.09±0.03^abAB
110R	3.46±0.26^bAB	18.89±0.11^aA	17.13±0.43^bAB	1.10±0.02^aA
101-14MG	3.92±0.06^aA	19.25±0.12^aA	18.70±0.19^aA	1.03±0.02^bcAB
SO4	3.39±0.03^bAB	18.47±0.26^aAB	18.40±0.32^aA	1.00±0.01^cB
188-08	3.66±0.15^abAB	16.53±0.40^cC	18.63±0.15^aA	0.88±0.02^dC
自根苗Self rooted seedling	3.18±0.13^bB	16.03±0.23^cC	15.59±0.26^cBC	1.03±0.01^bcAB

Effects of Different Rootstock Grafting on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Flame Seedless

不同砧木对火焰无核葡萄生长、产量及品质的影响

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 19

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

类型Type	DE	L	a	b
5BB/火焰无核 5BB/Flame	8.67±1.16^aAB	2.33±0.32^bB	7.98±1.13^aA	1.98±0.47^abA
110R/火焰无核 110R/Seedless	11.36±0.91^aA	2.86±0.42^bB	10.74±0.87^aA	2.04±0.29^abA
101-14MG/火焰无核 101-14MG/Seedless	11.43±1.32^aA	5.00±0.66^aA	8.79±1.45^aA	2.86±1.36^aA
SO4/火焰无核 SO4/Seedless	5.16±0.56^bBC	2.48±0.63^bB	3.74±0.79^bB	0.5±0.32^bA
188-08/火焰无核 188-08/Seedless	4.06±0.56^bC	1.62±0.40^bB	3.05±0.61^bB	0.8±0.55^bA
火焰无核自根苗Flame seedless self-rooted seedling	12.48±0.25^aA	2.08±0.31^bB	5.37±0.74^aA	1.87±0.55^aA

[1]	JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110.
[2]	YAN Manman, JIANG Tingting, ZHENG Feng. Practice and discussion on education and training of young managers in agricultural research institutes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 181-185.
[3]	FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80.
[4]	ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111.
[5]	CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121.
[6]	HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131.
[7]	WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139.
[8]	ZHANG Niao, WANG Hui, FENG Guojun, Zaituniguli Kuerban. Study on the agronomic traits and quality differences of grain sorghum in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
[9]	ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182.
[10]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289.
[11]	ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830.
[12]	HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of organic and inorganic combined application on yield, soil nutrients and enzyme activities of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852.
[13]	CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860.
[14]	YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871.
[15]	NIU Tingting, MA Mingsheng, ZHANG Jungao. Effects of straw returning and plastic film mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and spring maize yield in rain-fed upland farmland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906.