Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2024, Vol. 61 ›› Issue (9): 2160-2167.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2024.09.010
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Cultivation Physiology·Physiology and Biochemistry • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Niao1(), WANG Hui2, FENG Guojun2, Zaituniguli Kuerban2(
)
Received:
2024-03-10
Online:
2024-09-20
Published:
2024-10-09
Correspondence author:
Zaituniguli Kuerban
Supported by:
张鸟1(), 王卉2, 冯国郡2, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班2(
)
通讯作者:
再吐尼古丽·库尔班
作者简介:
张鸟(1996-),男,贵州人,硕士研究生,研究方向为农业资源与环境治理,(E-mail)2918847723@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHANG Niao, WANG Hui, FENG Guojun, Zaituniguli Kuerban. Study on the agronomic traits and quality differences of grain sorghum in Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
张鸟, 王卉, 冯国郡, 再吐尼古丽·库尔班. 不同粒用高粱品种产量和农艺性状及品质的差异性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167.
品种名称 Varieties name | 播种期 Sowing date (M/D) | 出苗期 Seeding stage (M/D) | 开花期 Flowering stage (M/D) | 成熟期 Maturity stage (M/D) | 生育期 Growth period(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 6/18 | 8/9 | 108 |
晋杂111 Jinza 111 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/2 | 8/24 | 123 |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/29 | 8/24 | 123 |
泉粱5号Quanliang5 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/2 | 9/8 | 138 |
济糯粱2号Jinuoliang 2 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/30 | 9/8 | 138 |
济粱1号Jiliang 1 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/4 | 9/8 | 138 |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/6 | 9/8 | 138 |
JN11 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/30 | 9/8 | 138 |
JN7 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/29 | 9/4 | 134 |
JN8 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/3 | 9/4 | 134 |
104 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/4 | 9/4 | 134 |
冀乡粱1号Jixiangliang 1 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/3 | 8/24 | 123 |
28A×恒纯28A × Hengchun | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/2 | 8/25 | 124 |
冀乡粱2号Jixiangliang 2 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/6 | 8/25 | 124 |
2878A×IR60 2878A×IR60 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/2 | 8/25 | 124 |
赤杂131 Chiza 131 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/29 | 8/25 | 124 |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/2 | 8/25 | 124 |
辽杂52 Liaoza 52 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/6 | 9/9 | 139 |
辽糯10 Liaonuo 10 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 6/28 | 9/8 | 138 |
辽糯11 Liaonuo 11 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/1 | 9/8 | 138 |
辽糯13 Liaonuo 13 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/3 | 8/27 | 126 |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/2 | 9/9 | 139 |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/1 | 8/26 | 125 |
晋白糯3号Jinbainuo 3 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/3 | 9/9 | 139 |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 4/24 | 4/30 | 6/14 | 7/25 | 95 |
Tab.1 Growth Period of different grain sorghum varieties
品种名称 Varieties name | 播种期 Sowing date (M/D) | 出苗期 Seeding stage (M/D) | 开花期 Flowering stage (M/D) | 成熟期 Maturity stage (M/D) | 生育期 Growth period(d) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 6/18 | 8/9 | 108 |
晋杂111 Jinza 111 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/2 | 8/24 | 123 |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/29 | 8/24 | 123 |
泉粱5号Quanliang5 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/2 | 9/8 | 138 |
济糯粱2号Jinuoliang 2 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/30 | 9/8 | 138 |
济粱1号Jiliang 1 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/4 | 9/8 | 138 |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/6 | 9/8 | 138 |
JN11 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/30 | 9/8 | 138 |
JN7 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/29 | 9/4 | 134 |
JN8 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/3 | 9/4 | 134 |
104 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/4 | 9/4 | 134 |
冀乡粱1号Jixiangliang 1 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/3 | 8/24 | 123 |
28A×恒纯28A × Hengchun | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/2 | 8/25 | 124 |
冀乡粱2号Jixiangliang 2 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/6 | 8/25 | 124 |
2878A×IR60 2878A×IR60 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/2 | 8/25 | 124 |
赤杂131 Chiza 131 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 6/29 | 8/25 | 124 |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/2 | 8/25 | 124 |
辽杂52 Liaoza 52 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/6 | 9/9 | 139 |
辽糯10 Liaonuo 10 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 6/28 | 9/8 | 138 |
辽糯11 Liaonuo 11 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/1 | 9/8 | 138 |
辽糯13 Liaonuo 13 | 4/23 | 4/29 | 7/3 | 8/27 | 126 |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/2 | 9/9 | 139 |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 4/23 | 4/30 | 7/1 | 8/26 | 125 |
晋白糯3号Jinbainuo 3 | 4/23 | 4/28 | 7/3 | 9/9 | 139 |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 4/24 | 4/30 | 6/14 | 7/25 | 95 |
品种名称 Varieties name | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) |
---|---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 108±0.20k | 29.60±0.67gh |
晋杂111 Jinza 111 | 107±1.82k | 30.30±1.56fgh |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 139±2.44efg | 37.60±0.36a |
泉粱5号Quan liang 5 | 146±3.82c | 33.00±2.64cdef |
济糯粱2号Jinuoliang 2 | 144±1.50cd | 32.60±1.52defg |
济粱1号Jiliang 1 | 123±1.82h | 32.6±1.88defg |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 135±1.84g | 34.60±3.40abcde |
JN11 | 142±0.82cdef | 36.00±1.08abc |
JN7 | 143±1.82cde | 37.30±2.87ab |
JN8 | 126±3.08h | 31.60±1.37efgh |
104 | 150±2.23b | 36.60±1.30ab |
冀乡粱1号 Jixiangliang 1 | 141±3.21def | 29.60±0.67gh |
28A×恒纯 28A × Hengchun | 118±2.72i | 30.30±1.44fgh |
冀乡粱2号 Jixiangliang 2 | 124±4.86h | 28.60±0.75h |
2878A×IR60 | 191±0.70a | 34.30±2.44bcde |
赤杂131 Chiza 131 | 146±3.75c | 29.60±1.64gh |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 122±1.27h | 35.60±2.93abcd |
辽杂52 Liaoza 52 | 142±2.54def | 28.60±3.31h |
辽糯10 Liaonuo 10 | 138±2.99fg | 30.30±1.88fgh |
辽糯11 Liaonuo 11 | 152±1.63b | 31.60±1.34efgh |
辽糯13 Liaonuo 13 | 154±2.70b | 32.30±1.44efg |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 153±2.32b | 31.60±0.67efgh |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 126±3.10h | 30.30±0.79fgh |
晋白糯3号Jinbainuo 3 | 114±1.69j | 31.60±2.66efgh |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 92±2.78l | 30.00±0.78fgh |
Tab.2 Changes of gronomic characters of different grain sorghum varieties
品种名称 Varieties name | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 穗长 Ear length (cm) |
---|---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 108±0.20k | 29.60±0.67gh |
晋杂111 Jinza 111 | 107±1.82k | 30.30±1.56fgh |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 139±2.44efg | 37.60±0.36a |
泉粱5号Quan liang 5 | 146±3.82c | 33.00±2.64cdef |
济糯粱2号Jinuoliang 2 | 144±1.50cd | 32.60±1.52defg |
济粱1号Jiliang 1 | 123±1.82h | 32.6±1.88defg |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 135±1.84g | 34.60±3.40abcde |
JN11 | 142±0.82cdef | 36.00±1.08abc |
JN7 | 143±1.82cde | 37.30±2.87ab |
JN8 | 126±3.08h | 31.60±1.37efgh |
104 | 150±2.23b | 36.60±1.30ab |
冀乡粱1号 Jixiangliang 1 | 141±3.21def | 29.60±0.67gh |
28A×恒纯 28A × Hengchun | 118±2.72i | 30.30±1.44fgh |
冀乡粱2号 Jixiangliang 2 | 124±4.86h | 28.60±0.75h |
2878A×IR60 | 191±0.70a | 34.30±2.44bcde |
赤杂131 Chiza 131 | 146±3.75c | 29.60±1.64gh |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 122±1.27h | 35.60±2.93abcd |
辽杂52 Liaoza 52 | 142±2.54def | 28.60±3.31h |
辽糯10 Liaonuo 10 | 138±2.99fg | 30.30±1.88fgh |
辽糯11 Liaonuo 11 | 152±1.63b | 31.60±1.34efgh |
辽糯13 Liaonuo 13 | 154±2.70b | 32.30±1.44efg |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 153±2.32b | 31.60±0.67efgh |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 126±3.10h | 30.30±0.79fgh |
晋白糯3号Jinbainuo 3 | 114±1.69j | 31.60±2.66efgh |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 92±2.78l | 30.00±0.78fgh |
品种名称 Varieties name | 可溶性总糖 Soluble sugar |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 16.65±1.89abc |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 16.18±1.00abc |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 14.60±0.17cd |
JN7 | 13.17±0.32d |
104 | 16.86±1.87abc |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 16.93±1.82abc |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 17.34±2.18ab |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 15.02±2.01bcd |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 18.42±1.46a |
Tab.3 Changes of soluble sugar content of different grain sorghum varieties (g/kg)
品种名称 Varieties name | 可溶性总糖 Soluble sugar |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 16.65±1.89abc |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 16.18±1.00abc |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 14.60±0.17cd |
JN7 | 13.17±0.32d |
104 | 16.86±1.87abc |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 16.93±1.82abc |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 17.34±2.18ab |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 15.02±2.01bcd |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 18.42±1.46a |
品种名称 Varieties name | 淀粉含量 Starch content |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 333.76±70.39c |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 608.51±44.84a |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 564.57±49.10ab |
JN7 | 510.11±4.18b |
104 | 497.41±69.41b |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 388.66±62.27c |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 360.10±11.90c |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 376.68±40.99c |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 377.50±28.00c |
Tab.4 Changes of starch content of different grain sorghum varieties (g/kg)
品种名称 Varieties name | 淀粉含量 Starch content |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 333.76±70.39c |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 608.51±44.84a |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 564.57±49.10ab |
JN7 | 510.11±4.18b |
104 | 497.41±69.41b |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 388.66±62.27c |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 360.10±11.90c |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 376.68±40.99c |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 377.50±28.00c |
品种名称 Varieties name | 单宁含量 Tannin content |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 3.44±1.47ab |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 3.58±0.72a |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 0.81±0.69d |
JN7 | 2.27±0.28bc |
104 | 0.79±1.13d |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 2.78±0.26ab |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 3.99±0.21a |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 1.17±0.07cd |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 0.66±0.18d |
Tab.5 Changes of tannin content of different grain sorghum varieties (g/kg)
品种名称 Varieties name | 单宁含量 Tannin content |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 3.44±1.47ab |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 3.58±0.72a |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 0.81±0.69d |
JN7 | 2.27±0.28bc |
104 | 0.79±1.13d |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 2.78±0.26ab |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 3.99±0.21a |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 1.17±0.07cd |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 0.66±0.18d |
品种名称 Varieties name | 赖氨酸含量 Lysine cotent |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 0.86±0.39c |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 0.48±0.02c |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 0.55±0.66c |
JN7 | 0.24±0.09c |
104 | 0.58±59.70c |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 2.13±1.36b |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 0.37±0.27c |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 0.15±0.12c |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 3.26±0.08a |
Tab.6 Changes of lysine cotent of different grain sorghum varieties (g/kg)
品种名称 Varieties name | 赖氨酸含量 Lysine cotent |
---|---|
晋糯103 Jinnuo 103 | 0.86±0.39c |
济粱3号Jiliang 3 | 0.48±0.02c |
济粱4号Jiliang 4 | 0.55±0.66c |
JN7 | 0.24±0.09c |
104 | 0.58±59.70c |
平试16 Pingshi 16 | 2.13±1.36b |
辽糯18 Liaonuo 18 | 0.37±0.27c |
晋白糯1号Jinbainuo 1 | 0.15±0.12c |
龙杂20 Longza 20 | 3.26±0.08a |
[1] | 郭敏, 保玉心, 黄永光, 等. 不同高粱品种酿造酱香型白酒发酵特性的研究[J]. 中国酿造, 2018, 37(1): 102-107. |
GUO Min, BAO Yuxin, HUANG Yongguang, et al. Study on fermentation characteristics of Maotai-flavor liquor brewed by different sorghum varieties[J]. China Brewing, 2018, 37(1): 102-107. | |
[2] | 田晓红, 谭斌, 谭洪卓, 等. 20种高粱淀粉特性[J]. 食品科学, 2010, 31(15): 13-20. |
TIAN Xiaohong, TAN Bin, TAN Hongzhuo, et al. Properties of Sorghum starches from twenty varieties in China[J]. Food Science, 2010, 31(15): 13-20. | |
[3] | 康健, 李云, 王健, 等. 20个高粱品种在冀东地区的适应性比较[J]. 河北科技师范学院学报, 2022, 36(3): 29-33, 39. |
KANG Jian, LI Yun, WANG Jian, et al. The adaptive screening of 20 Sorghum varieties in eastern Hebei Province[J]. Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology, 2022, 36(3): 29-33, 39. | |
[4] | 章洁琼, 赵小敏, 雷文权, 等. 不同酒用高粱品种丰产稳产性及主要品质特性分析[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(20): 130-137. |
ZHANG Jieqiong, ZHAO Xiaomin, LEI Wenquan, et al. Analysis of high and stable yield and main quality characteristics of different sorghum cultivars for wine[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(20): 130-137. | |
[5] | 宋高友, 张纯慎, 苏益民, 等. 高粱籽粒品质对出酒率影响的初步探讨[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1986, (5): 6-8. |
SONG Gaoyou, ZHANG Chunshen, SU Yimin, et al. Preliminary study on the effect of sorghum grain quality on liquor yield[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 1986, (5): 6-8. | |
[6] | 赵小敏, 章洁琼, 胡朝凤, 等. 遵义8个酒用高粱品种的产量及酿酒品质[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2022, 50(5): 120-125. |
ZHAO Xiaomin, ZHANG Jieqiong, HU (Chao|Zhao)(Feng), et al. Yield and brewing quality of 8 Sorghum varieties for liquor[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(5): 120-125. | |
[7] | 毛祥, 温雪瓶, 黄丹, 等. 5种常用酿酒高粱的主要成分及淀粉特性差异分析[J]. 中国酿造, 2020, 39(3): 57-62. |
MAO Xiang, WEN Xueping, HUANG Dan, et al. Difference analysis on main components and starch properties in five commonly used liquor-making sorghum[J]. China Brewing, 2020, 39(3): 57-62. | |
[8] | 陆平. 高粱种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. |
LU Ping. Descriptors and data standard for sorghum[sorghum bicolor (L.) moench][M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. | |
[9] | 宁正祥. 食品成分分析手册[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2001. |
NING Zhengxiang. Manual of Food Composition Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Light Industry Press, 2001. | |
[10] | 余桂红, 吴勇华, 马鸿翔, 等. 小麦籽粒赖氨酸含量的测定与评价[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(2): 372-377. |
YU Guihong, WU Yonghua, MA Hongxiang, et al. Determination and evaluation of lysine content in harvested wheat grain[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 25(2): 372-377. | |
[11] | 徐雨亲, 谢珊, 汪思昊, 等. 播期对江西地区不同高粱品种产量及主要农艺性状的影响[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2023, (5): 15-19. |
XU Yuqin, XIE Shan, WANG Sihao, et al. Effects of sowing date on yield and main agronomic traits of different Sorghum varieties in Jiangxi Region[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, (5): 15-19. | |
[12] | 马强强, 汪星宇, 崔阔澍, 等. 不同饲用麦类品种农艺性状、生产性能和营养品质比较[J]. 草学, 2023, (4): 16-26. |
MA Qiangqiang, WANG Xingyu, CUI Kuashu, et al. Comparison of agronomic traits, performance and Nutritional quality of Different forage wheat varieties[J]. Journal of Agronomy, 2023, (4): 16-26. | |
[13] | 王怡, 刘守渠, 郭峰, 等. 山西省不同生态区玉米品种主要农艺性状遗传分析及大斑病抗性评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(14): 76-83. |
WANG Yi, LIU Shouqu, GUO Feng, et al. Genetic analysis of main agronomic characters of maize varieties in different ecological regions of Shanxi Province and evaluation of resistance to northern leaf blight[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 51(14): 76-83. | |
[14] | 李资文, 李志刚, 周伟, 等. 高粱品系的主要农艺性状评价与综合分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(19): 6503-6511. |
LI Ziwen, LI Zhigang, ZHOU Wei, et al. Comprehensive analysis and evaluation of main agronomic traits of Sorghum[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(19): 6503-6511. | |
[15] | 彭泽, 胡明文, 白立伟, 等. 不同辣椒品种的农艺性状与品质指标综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2023, (1): 1-10. |
PENG Ze, HU Mingwen, BAI Liwei, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic characters and quality indexes of different pepper varieties[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2023, (1): 1-10. | |
[16] | 申瑞玲, 陈明, 任贵兴. 高粱淀粉的研究进展[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2012, 27(7): 123-128. |
SHEN Ruiling, CHEN Ming, REN Guixing. Research progress of the Sorghum starch[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2012, 27(7): 123-128. | |
[17] | 闫松显, 吕云怀, 王莉, 等. 西南区酿酒高粱的种质形成和发展[J]. 中国酿造, 2017, 36(5): 17-21. |
YAN Songxian, LYU Yunhuai, WANG Li, et al. Germplasm formation and development of Baijiu-making sorghum in the southwest of China[J]. China Brewing, 2017, 36(5): 17-21. | |
[18] | 刘娟, 李鲜花, 赵欢蕊, 等. 不同品种高粱淀粉、赖氨酸和单宁含量的比较[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2019, 65(3): 5-9, 16. |
LIU Juan, LI Xianhua, ZHAO Huanrui, et al. Comparison of starch, lysine and tannin contents in different Sorghum varieties[J]. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 65(3): 5-9, 16. | |
[19] | 高旭, 徐建霞, 丁延庆, 等. 酿酒高粱籽粒理化品质及蒸煮特性分析[J]. 食品科技, 2023, 48(1): 159-166. |
GAO Xu, XU Jianxia, DING Yanqing, et al. Analysis of physicochemical quality and cooking characteristics of brewer Sorghum grains[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2023, 48(1): 159-166. |
[1] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[2] | NIU Tingting, MA Mingsheng, ZHANG Jungao. Effects of straw returning and plastic film mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and spring maize yield in rain-fed upland farmland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
[3] | ZHONG Huili, WU Jun, LU Xiangsheng. Effects of different growth stage application combinations of amendments on secondary salinized soil properties and sweet corn yield in Hexi Corrido [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1615-1625. |
[4] | LU Weidan, ZHOU Yuanhang, MA Xiaolong, GAO Jianglong, FAN Xiaoqin, GUO Jianfu, LI Jianqiang, LIN Ming. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer in different proportions and plant nutrients and sugar beet yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1631-1639. |
[5] | HOU Xianfei, LI Qiang, MIAO haocui, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, Maimaiyiming Simayi, CUI Fuyang. Effects of cotton-peanut rotation on the soil physicochemical properties and the yield of crop [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1657-1665. |
[6] | ZHANG Zhao, ZHANG Guilong, TANG Qiuxiang, YAN Xueying, ZHANG Yanjun. Effects of combination of organic and inorganic fertilizers on fertility and yield of winter wheat in fluvo-aquic soil [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(5): 1067-1076. |
[7] | Zaituniguli Kuerban, Tuerxun Tuerhong, Yisilayi Dawuti, WANG Hui, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer topdressing methods on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of sweet sorghum [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 326-335. |
[8] | WANG Jijiao, PAN Yue, WANG Shiwei, HAN Zhengwei, MA Yong, HU Haifang, WANG Baoqing. Canonical correlation analysis of soil nutrients and the quality of Beibinghong grape juice [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(2): 355-364. |
[9] | SUN Chen, HUAI Guolong, WANG Bin, SUN Jiusheng, YANG Zhiying, SHAN Nana. Effects of reducing fertilizer and applying fulvic acid on soil nutrients and peanut growth [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(12): 2934-2942. |
[10] | FENG Mei, XIAO Lijuan, ZHANG Shiqing, WANG Jingjing. Effects of soil nutrients on amino acids in junzao jujube orchard [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 136-147. |
[11] | DENG Yonghui, ZHENG Qiangqing, YAN Pan, WANG Wenjun, CHEN Qiling, WANG Jingjing, ZHANG Jinqiang, WANG Zhendong. Research on the relationship between root distribution characteristics of Jun-jujube and soil nutrient in arid area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(1): 156-164. |
[12] | YUE Li, WANG Hui, Shanqimike , Zaituniguli Kuerban, TU Zhendong. Microbial diversity analysis of sweet sorghum silage using High-Throughput sequencing [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2742-2750. |
[13] | LYU Liangyu, FAN Guanghui, FU Quan, SU Caifeng, LI Fayi. Effects of bio-organic fertilizer on growth and soil properties of Lycium barbarum L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(11): 2779-2789. |
[14] | ZUO Xiaoxiao, YAN An, NING Songrui, YANG Li, SUN Meng, LU Qiancheng. Study on the effect of Bio-Organic fertilizer on promoting growth and increasing yield in saline alkali wheat field [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(10): 2532-2540. |
[15] | SHI Xueping, ZHANG Qian, WANG Yan, DONG Ming, QI Hong, FENG Guoyi, SUN Hongchun, WANG Shulin. Effects of Manure Replacing Part Chemical Fertilizers on Soil Nutrient Contents, Cotton Yields and Returns of Fertilizer Inputs [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(1): 192-196. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||