Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2022, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (9): 2179-2185.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2022.09.011
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing·Soil Fertilizer·Water Saving Irrigation·Prataculture·Food Process Engineering • Previous Articles Next Articles
XING Yongfeng(), ZHOU Wenwei, XU Weimeng, CHEN Guoli(
), WEI Changmin, LI Guizhi, SONG Wanyou, WAN Yanwei, ZHOU Enzhong, LI Weifang
Received:
2021-11-12
Online:
2022-09-20
Published:
2023-01-16
Correspondence author:
CHEN Guoli
Supported by:
邢永锋(), 周文伟, 许卫猛, 陈国立(
), 魏常敏, 李桂芝, 宋万友, 万彦伟, 周恩忠, 李伟房
通讯作者:
陈国立
作者简介:
邢永锋(1980-),男,河南沈丘人,助理研究员,硕士,研究方向为玉米高产栽培,(E-mail)zkxingyongfeng@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
XING Yongfeng, ZHOU Wenwei, XU Weimeng, CHEN Guoli, WEI Changmin, LI Guizhi, SONG Wanyou, WAN Yanwei, ZHOU Enzhong, LI Weifang. Effects and Correlative Analysis of Slow-release Nitrogen Supply on Yield and Dry Matter of Summer Maize at Lime Concretion Black Soil[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59(9): 2179-2185.
邢永锋, 周文伟, 许卫猛, 陈国立, 魏常敏, 李桂芝, 宋万友, 万彦伟, 周恩忠, 李伟房. 缓释氮对砂姜黑土区夏玉米干物质积累和产量影响及相关分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(9): 2179-2185.
处理 Treatment | 拔节期 V6 | 抽雄期 VT | 灌浆期 R3 | 成熟期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 787.86e | 3 119.17e | 14 215.27e | 15 113.50d |
C70 | 936.75d | 3 945.02d | 15 025.27d | 17 597.07c |
C140 | 1 202.56c | 5 205.96c | 15 794.20c | 18 945.63b |
C210 | 1 381.76b | 7 655.59a | 17 323.53a | 20 565.93a |
C280 | 1 547.40a | 6 163.52b | 16 617.59b | 18 652.90b |
Table 1 Dry matter accumulation of population at different growth stages(kg/hm2)
处理 Treatment | 拔节期 V6 | 抽雄期 VT | 灌浆期 R3 | 成熟期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 787.86e | 3 119.17e | 14 215.27e | 15 113.50d |
C70 | 936.75d | 3 945.02d | 15 025.27d | 17 597.07c |
C140 | 1 202.56c | 5 205.96c | 15 794.20c | 18 945.63b |
C210 | 1 381.76b | 7 655.59a | 17 323.53a | 20 565.93a |
C280 | 1 547.40a | 6 163.52b | 16 617.59b | 18 652.90b |
处理Treatment | 拔节期 V6 | 抽雄期 VT | 灌浆期 R3 | 成熟期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 467.19e | 926.71e | 2 956.82e | 2 297.28d |
C70 | 573.24d | 1 234.87d | 3 425.81d | 2 780.45c |
C140 | 758.69c | 1 785.72c | 4 011.75c | 3 107.33b |
C210 | 924.55b | 2 878.33a | 4 637.54a | 3 681.11a |
C280 | 1 013.07a | 2 225.60b | 4 191.46b | 3 188.88b |
Table 2 Dry matter accumulation of leaves at different growth stages(kg/hm2)
处理Treatment | 拔节期 V6 | 抽雄期 VT | 灌浆期 R3 | 成熟期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 467.19e | 926.71e | 2 956.82e | 2 297.28d |
C70 | 573.24d | 1 234.87d | 3 425.81d | 2 780.45c |
C140 | 758.69c | 1 785.72c | 4 011.75c | 3 107.33b |
C210 | 924.55b | 2 878.33a | 4 637.54a | 3 681.11a |
C280 | 1 013.07a | 2 225.60b | 4 191.46b | 3 188.88b |
处理 Treatment | 拔节期 V6 | 抽雄期 VT | 灌浆期 R3 | 成熟期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 320.67d | 2 192.46e | 8 045.72a | 5 937.0945a |
C70 | 363.51c | 2 710.15d | 7 362.25c | 5 912.1304a |
C140 | 443.86b | 3 420.24c | 7 075.75d | 5 889.5537a |
C210 | 457.21b | 4 777.27a | 7 015.02d | 5 541.6406a |
C280 | 534.33a | 3 937.92b | 7 622.94b | 5 528.5225a |
Table 3 Dry matter accumulation of stem and sheath at different growth stages(kg/hm2)
处理 Treatment | 拔节期 V6 | 抽雄期 VT | 灌浆期 R3 | 成熟期 R6 |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 320.67d | 2 192.46e | 8 045.72a | 5 937.0945a |
C70 | 363.51c | 2 710.15d | 7 362.25c | 5 912.1304a |
C140 | 443.86b | 3 420.24c | 7 075.75d | 5 889.5537a |
C210 | 457.21b | 4 777.27a | 7 015.02d | 5 541.6406a |
C280 | 534.33a | 3 937.92b | 7 622.94b | 5 528.5225a |
处理 | 轴+苞叶BCW(kg/hm2) | 籽粒GW(kg/hm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | 灌浆期R3 | 成熟期R6 | 灌浆期R3 | 成熟期R6 |
C0 | 1 445.724 2e | 1 099.415 2b | 1 766.996 2c | 5 797.934 1d |
C70 | 2 118.598 1d | 1 272.630 5a | 2 118.598 1a | 7 631.844 7c |
C140 | 2 588.684 8c | 1 287.832 9a | 2 118.015a | 8 678.327 1b |
C210 | 3 686.131 3a | 1 278.271 2a | 1 984.84b | 10 128.562 2a |
C280 | 2 881.915 5b | 1 344.211 3a | 1 921.277 1b | 8 628.726 9b |
Table 4 Dry matter accumulation of panicle at different growth stages(kg/hm2)
处理 | 轴+苞叶BCW(kg/hm2) | 籽粒GW(kg/hm2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | 灌浆期R3 | 成熟期R6 | 灌浆期R3 | 成熟期R6 |
C0 | 1 445.724 2e | 1 099.415 2b | 1 766.996 2c | 5 797.934 1d |
C70 | 2 118.598 1d | 1 272.630 5a | 2 118.598 1a | 7 631.844 7c |
C140 | 2 588.684 8c | 1 287.832 9a | 2 118.015a | 8 678.327 1b |
C210 | 3 686.131 3a | 1 278.271 2a | 1 984.84b | 10 128.562 2a |
C280 | 2 881.915 5b | 1 344.211 3a | 1 921.277 1b | 8 628.726 9b |
处理 Treatment | 穗行数 Row number | 行粒数(粒)Grain Number Per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 产量 Actual yield/ (t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 12.73b | 22.95c | 307.61c | 3 713.69d |
C70 | 13.16b | 29.17b | 307.86c | 5 068.28c |
C140 | 14.99a | 28.58b | 313.63b | 6 812.29b |
C210 | 15.62a | 31.55a | 316.53ab | 8 531.65a |
C280 | 14.86a | 29.03b | 309.53bc | 6 965.91b |
Table 5 Analysis of Yield character
处理 Treatment | 穗行数 Row number | 行粒数(粒)Grain Number Per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 产量 Actual yield/ (t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
C0 | 12.73b | 22.95c | 307.61c | 3 713.69d |
C70 | 13.16b | 29.17b | 307.86c | 5 068.28c |
C140 | 14.99a | 28.58b | 313.63b | 6 812.29b |
C210 | 15.62a | 31.55a | 316.53ab | 8 531.65a |
C280 | 14.86a | 29.03b | 309.53bc | 6 965.91b |
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 穗行数 Rows number | 行粒数 Grain Number Per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight |
---|---|---|---|
V6叶LWV6 | 0.89** | 0.73* | 0.58* |
VT叶LWVT | 0.94** | 0.81* | 0.84** |
R3叶LWR3 | 0.98** | 0.87** | 0.84** |
R6叶LWR6 | 0.95** | 0.91** | 0.86** |
V6茎+鞘SSWV6 | 0.84* | 0.65* | 0.44 |
VT茎+鞘SSWVT | 0.95** | 0.83* | 0.84** |
R3茎+鞘SSRW3 | -0.74* | -0.86** | -0.79* |
R6茎+鞘SSWR6 | -0.75* | -0.63* | -0.53 |
R3轴+苞叶BCWR3 | 0.94** | 0.89** | 0.85** |
R6轴+苞叶重BCWR6 | 0.71* | 0.85* | 0.35 |
R3籽粒重GWR3 | 0.33 | 0.68* | 0.28 |
R6籽粒重GWR6 | 0.94** | 0.94** | 0.85** |
Table 6 Correlation analysis of dry matter accumulation and Componets of yield
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 穗行数 Rows number | 行粒数 Grain Number Per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight |
---|---|---|---|
V6叶LWV6 | 0.89** | 0.73* | 0.58* |
VT叶LWVT | 0.94** | 0.81* | 0.84** |
R3叶LWR3 | 0.98** | 0.87** | 0.84** |
R6叶LWR6 | 0.95** | 0.91** | 0.86** |
V6茎+鞘SSWV6 | 0.84* | 0.65* | 0.44 |
VT茎+鞘SSWVT | 0.95** | 0.83* | 0.84** |
R3茎+鞘SSRW3 | -0.74* | -0.86** | -0.79* |
R6茎+鞘SSWR6 | -0.75* | -0.63* | -0.53 |
R3轴+苞叶BCWR3 | 0.94** | 0.89** | 0.85** |
R6轴+苞叶重BCWR6 | 0.71* | 0.85* | 0.35 |
R3籽粒重GWR3 | 0.33 | 0.68* | 0.28 |
R6籽粒重GWR6 | 0.94** | 0.94** | 0.85** |
相关关系 Correlation coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t检验值 T test value | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y,X3) | 0.981 8 | 5.172 1 | 0.121 6 |
r(y,X9) | -0.951 7 | 3.101 | 0.198 6 |
r(y,X10) | -0.884 9 | 1.899 5 | 0.308 5 |
Table 7 The value of partial correlation of row number and organ dry matter quality
相关关系 Correlation coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t检验值 T test value | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y,X3) | 0.981 8 | 5.172 1 | 0.121 6 |
r(y,X9) | -0.951 7 | 3.101 | 0.198 6 |
r(y,X10) | -0.884 9 | 1.899 5 | 0.308 5 |
相关关系 Correlation coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t检验值 T test value | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y,X1) | 0.879 0 | 1.843 9 | 0.316 4 |
r(y,X3) | -0.938 2 | 2.711 5 | 0.224 9 |
r(y,X12) | -0.970 0 | 3.988 3 | 0.156 4 |
Table 8 The value of partial correlation of grain number and organ dry matter quality
相关关系 Correlation coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t检验值 T test value | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y,X1) | 0.879 0 | 1.843 9 | 0.316 4 |
r(y,X3) | -0.938 2 | 2.711 5 | 0.224 9 |
r(y,X12) | -0.970 0 | 3.988 3 | 0.156 4 |
相关关系 Correlation coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t检验值 T test value | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y,X4)= | 0.972 3 | 4.161 1 | 0.150 1 |
r(y,X9)= | -0.946 3 | 2.925 9 | 0.209 7 |
r(y,X10)= | -0.986 3 | 5.973 5 | 0.105 6 |
Table 9 The value of partial correlation of 1000-grain weight and organ dry matter quality
相关关系 Correlation coefficient | 偏相关 Partial correlation | t检验值 T test value | P值 |
---|---|---|---|
r(y,X4)= | 0.972 3 | 4.161 1 | 0.150 1 |
r(y,X9)= | -0.946 3 | 2.925 9 | 0.209 7 |
r(y,X10)= | -0.986 3 | 5.973 5 | 0.105 6 |
因子 Factor | 直接作用 Direct action | 间接作用 Lndirect effect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X3→Y | X9→Y | X10→Y | ||
X3 | 2.514 1 | -1.381 2 | -0.157 6 | |
X9 | -1.398 4 | 2.483 2 | -0.148 1 | |
X10 | -0.206 8 | 1.916 | -1.001 6 |
Table 10 Dry matter correlation and row number analysis
因子 Factor | 直接作用 Direct action | 间接作用 Lndirect effect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X3→Y | X9→Y | X10→Y | ||
X3 | 2.514 1 | -1.381 2 | -0.157 6 | |
X9 | -1.398 4 | 2.483 2 | -0.148 1 | |
X10 | -0.206 8 | 1.916 | -1.001 6 |
因子 Factor | 直接作用 Direct action | 间接作用 Lndirect effect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X3→Y | X9→Y | X10→Y | ||
X1 | 0.772 2 | -2.762 5 | 2.715 4 | |
X3 | -3.009 5 | 0.708 8 | 3.165 2 | |
X12 | 3.233 8 | 0.648 4 | -2.945 6 |
Table 11 Dry matter distribution and yield path analysis
因子 Factor | 直接作用 Direct action | 间接作用 Lndirect effect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X3→Y | X9→Y | X10→Y | ||
X1 | 0.772 2 | -2.762 5 | 2.715 4 | |
X3 | -3.009 5 | 0.708 8 | 3.165 2 | |
X12 | 3.233 8 | 0.648 4 | -2.945 6 |
因子 Factor | 直接作用 Direct action | 间接作用 Lndirect effect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X3→Y | X9→Y | X10→Y | ||
X4 | 4.489 4 | -2.991 1 | -0.639 4 | |
X9 | -3.00 4 | 4.470 1 | -0.612 5 | |
X10 | -0.855 3 | 3.356 4 | -2.151 5 |
Table 12 Dry matter distribution and yield path analysis
因子 Factor | 直接作用 Direct action | 间接作用 Lndirect effect | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
X3→Y | X9→Y | X10→Y | ||
X4 | 4.489 4 | -2.991 1 | -0.639 4 | |
X9 | -3.00 4 | 4.470 1 | -0.612 5 | |
X10 | -0.855 3 | 3.356 4 | -2.151 5 |
[1] | 薛豫宛, 李太魁, 张玉亭, 等. 砂姜黑土农田土壤障碍因子消减技术浅析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2013, 42(10):66-69. |
XUE Yuwan, LI Taikui, ZHANG Yuting, et al. Analysis on the technology of reducing the obstacle factors of farmland soil in Black Soil[J]. Henan Agricultural Science, 2013, 42(10):66-69. | |
[2] | 查理思, 吴克宁, 李玲, 等. 河南省砂姜黑土土属的耕作障碍因素研究[J]. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(2):280-286. |
CHA lisi, WU Kenning, LI Ling, et al. Study on the cultivation obstacle factors of the soil genus of Black Soil in Henan Province[J]. Soil Bulletin, 2015, 46(2):280-286. | |
[3] | 姜涛. 缓释氮运筹对夏玉米产量、品质及植株养分含量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(3):559-565. |
JIANG Tao. Effects of slow release nitrogen fertilizer on yield,quality and nutrient content of Summer Maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(3):559-565. | |
[4] | 司东霞, 崔振岭, 陈新平, 等. 不同控释缓释氮对夏玉米同化物积累及氮平衡的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(6):1745-1751. |
SI Dong xia, CUI Zhenling, CHEN Xinping, et al. Effects of different controlled release and slow release nitrogen fertilizers on the accumulation of assimilates and nitrogen balance in summer maize[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2014, 25(6):1745-1751. | |
[5] | 周进宝, 杨国航, 孙世贤, 等. 黄淮海夏播玉米区玉米生产现状和发展趋势[J]. 作物杂志, 2008,(2):4-7. |
ZHOU Jinbao, YANG Guohang, SUN Shixian, et al. Current situation and development trend of maize production in summer sowing maize area of Huang Huai Hai[J]. Crop Magazine, 2008,(2):4-7. | |
[6] |
Dordas C A, Lithourgidis A S, Matsi T, et al. Application of liquid cattle manure and inorganic fertilizers affect dry matter,nitrogen accumulation,and partitioning in maize[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2008, 80(3):283-296.
DOI URL |
[7] | 赵霞, 刘京宝, 土振华, 等. 缓、控释肥对夏玉米生长及产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008,(6):247-249. |
ZHAO Xia, LIU Jingbao, TU Zhenhua, et al. Effects of slow and controlled release fertilizers on growth and yield of Summer Maize[J]. Chinese Agronomy Bulletin, 2008,(6):247-249. | |
[8] | 周宝元, 孙雪芳, 丁在松, 等. 土壤耕作和施肥方式对夏玉米干物质积累与产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(11):2129-2140. |
ZHOU Yuanbao, SUN Xuefang, DING Zaisong, et al. Effects of soil tillage and Fertilization on dry matter accumulation and yield of Summer Maize[J]. Agricultural Science in China, 2017, 50(11):2129-2140. | |
[9] | 易镇邪, 王璞, 申丽霞. 不同类型缓释氮对夏玉米氮肥累积、转运与缓释氮利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006,(32):772-778. |
YI Zhengxie, WANG Pu, SHEN Lixia. Effects of different types of slow release nitrogen fertilizer on accumulation,transportation and utilization of nitrogen fertilizer in summer maize[J]. Acta Crop, 2006,(32):772-778. | |
[10] |
Gu B, Ge Y, Chang S X, Luo W, Chang J. Nitrate in groundwater of China:Sources and driving forces[J]. Global Environmental Change, 2013, 23(5):1112-1121.
DOI URL |
[11] | 李广浩, 赵斌, 董树亭, 等. 控释尿素水氮耦合对夏玉米产量和光合特性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(9):1406-1415. |
LI Guang hao, ZHAO Bin, DONG Shu ting, et al. Effects of coupling of controlled release urea in water and nitrogen on Yield and photosynthetic characteristics of Summer Maize[J]. Acta Crop, 2015, 41(9):1406-1415. | |
[12] | 王寅, 冯国忠, 张天山, 等. 控释氮肥与尿素混施对连作春玉米产量、 氮素吸收和氮素平衡的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(3):518-528. |
WANG Y, FENG G Z, ZHANG T S, et al. Effects of mixed application of controlled-release N fertilizer and common urea on grain yield,N uptake and soil N balance in continuous spring maize production[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(3):518-528. | |
[13] | 衣文平, 朱国梁, 武良, 等. 不同量的包膜控释尿素与普通尿素配施在夏玉米上的应用研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16 (6):1497-1502. |
YI Wenping, ZHU Guoliang, WU Liang, et al. Study on the application of different amounts of coated controlled release urea combined with common urea in summer maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2010, 16 (6):1497-1502. | |
[14] | 杨恒山, 张玉芹, 徐寿军, 等. 超高产春玉米干物质及养分积累与转运特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(2):315-323. |
YANG Hengsan, ZHANG Yuqin, XU Shoutao, et al. Characteristics of dry matter and nutrient accumulation and transport in Super High Yield Spring Maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2012, 18(2):315-323. | |
[15] | 李宗新, 陈源泉, 王庆成, 等. 密植条件下种植方式对夏玉米群体根冠特性及产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(23):7391-7401. |
LI Zong xin, CHEN Yuanquan, WANG Qingcheng, et al. Effects of planting patterns on root and shoot characteristics and yield of summer maize under high planting density[J]. Acta Ecologca Sinica 2012, 32(23):7391-7401. | |
[16] | 赵洪祥, 边少锋, 孙宁, 等. 缓释氮运筹对玉米氮肥动态变化和缓释氮肥利用的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2012, 20(3):122-129. |
ZHAO Hongxiang, BIAN Shaofeng, SUN Ning, et al. Effects of slow release nitrogen fertilizer application methods on dynamic change of nitrogen fertilizer and slow release nitrogen utilization in Maize[J]. Corn Science, 2012, 20(3):122-129. | |
[17] |
Maddonni G A, Otegui M E, Cirilo A G. Plant population density,row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2001, 71(3):183-193.
DOI URL |
[18] | 陈国平, 王荣焕, 赵久然. 玉米高产田的产量结构模式及关键因素分析[J]. 玉米科学, 2009, 17(4):89-93. |
CHEN Guoping, WANG Ronghuan, ZHAO Jiuran. Analysis on yield structure model and key factors of maize high yield field[J]. Corn Science, 2009, 17(4):89-93. | |
[19] | 于亚利, 贾文凯, 等. 春玉米叶片 SPAD 值与氮含量及产量的相关性研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2011, 19(4):89-92. |
YU Yali, JIA Wenkai, et al. Correlation between SPAD value of spring maize leaves and nitrogen content and yield[J]. Corn Science, 2011, 19(4):89-92. | |
[20] | 张学林, 徐钧, 安婷婷, 等. 不同氮肥水平下玉米根际土壤特性与产量的关系[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(14):2687-2699. |
ZHANG Xueling, XU Jun, AN Tingting, et al. Relationship between characteristics of maize rhizosphere soil and yield under different nitrogen application levels[J]. Agricultural Science in China, 2016, 49(14):2687-2699. |
[1] | FANG Hui, DING Yindeng, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, HUANG Tianrong. Research report on the development status of wheat industry in southern Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 75-80. |
[2] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[3] | CHEN Ruijie, LUO Linyi, RUAN Xiangyang, YE Jun. Effects of humic acid on soil nutrients, cotton yield and quality in cotton fields under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2112-2121. |
[4] | HUANG Boxuan, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, SHAO Jingjing, FENG Weina, PANG Chaoyou, XU Wenxiu, DONG Helin. Effects of different nitrogen inhibitors on growth, nitrogen utilization and yield of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2122-2131. |
[5] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, SUNXiaogui , ZHANG Tingjun. Different dosage of microbial agents on the yield and quality of processed tomatoes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2285-2289. |
[6] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[7] | HOU Lili, WANG Wei, CUI Xinju, ZHOU Dawei. Effects of organic and inorganic combined application on yield, soil nutrients and enzyme activities of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1845-1852. |
[8] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[9] | YUAN Yingying, ZHAO Jinghua, Dilimulati Simayi, YANG Tingrui. Study on physiological indexes and yield analysis of spring wheat in pots based on apriori algorithm [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1861-1871. |
[10] | NIU Tingting, MA Mingsheng, ZHANG Jungao. Effects of straw returning and plastic film mulching on soil physical and chemical properties and spring maize yield in rain-fed upland farmland [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1896-1906. |
[11] | ZHAO Minhua, SONG Bingxi, ZHANG Yupeng, GAO Zhihong, ZHU Yongyong, CHEN Xiaoyuan. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction on rice yield and nitrogen partial factor productivity under dry farming conditions [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1907-1915. |
[12] | ZHANG Caihong, WANG Guoqiang, JIANG Luyan, LIU Tao, DE Xianming. Variation of environmental factors and analysis of tomato traits in low-energy assembly-type deep-winter production solar greenhouse [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 2043-2053. |
[13] | YANG Mei, ZHAO Hongmei, Dilireba Xiamixiding, YANG Weijun, ZHANG Jinshan, HUI Chao. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and biochar application on population structure, photosynthetic characteristics and yield of spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1582-1589. |
[14] | LU Weidan, ZHOU Yuanhang, MA Xiaolong, GAO Jianglong, FAN Xiaoqin, GUO Jianfu, LI Jianqiang, LIN Ming. Effects of replacing chemical fertilizer with organic fertilizer in different proportions and plant nutrients and sugar beet yield [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1631-1639. |
[15] | GAO Jun, HOU Xianfei, MIAO Haocui, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, WANGH Tianling, HNU Yi, CHENG Xiaolu, LI Qiang. Effect of cotton-peanut crop rotation pattern on the distribution of dry matter accumulation and yield of peanut [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(7): 1648-1656. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 52
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 280
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||