Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2021, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (11): 2084-2093.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2021.11.015
• Plant Protection·Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing • Previous Articles Next Articles
DING Xiang1(), ZHOU Weiquan1, Maihemuti Turupu1, NIU Yingying1, FAN Guoquan2, LIAO Kang1(
)
Received:
2020-10-21
Online:
2021-11-20
Published:
2021-12-16
Correspondence author:
LIAO Kang
Supported by:
丁想1(), 周伟权1, 麦合木提·图如普1, 牛莹莹1, 樊国全2, 廖康1(
)
通讯作者:
廖康
作者简介:
丁想(1996-),女,新疆沙湾人,硕士研究生,研究方向为果树栽培与生理,(E-mail) 13150300589@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
DING Xiang, ZHOU Weiquan, Maihemuti Turupu, NIU Yingying, FAN Guoquan, LIAO Kang. Effects of Bud-notching and Branch-bending on Growth and Development of Korla Fragrant Pear[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(11): 2084-2093.
丁想, 周伟权, 麦合木提·图如普, 牛莹莹, 樊国全, 廖康. 刻芽和拉枝对库尔勒香梨生长发育的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(11): 2084-2093.
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 萌芽率 Germination rate(%) | 短枝率 Short shoot rate(%) | 中枝率 Medium shoot rate(%) | 长枝率 Long shoot rate(%) | 成枝率 Sprout rate(%) | 成花率 Flowering rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 78.76±1.66d | 7.51±0.51ab | 20.66±1.22a | 71.82±0.84d | 58.48±1.71d | 0.93±0.07f | |
萌芽前 Before germination | 1/3刻芽 | 87.72±1.50c | 1.97±0.99e | 16.70±1.81abcd | 81.33±2.53abc | 69.30±2.29ab | 5.71±0.57ab |
2/3刻芽 | 96.99±1.54a | 4.74±0.82bcd | 17.65±0.85abc | 77.61±1.73cd | 68.89±2.09ab | 3.65±0.62cd | |
环割 | 91.98±1.17bc | 2.22±1.05de | 11.17±0.71de | 86.61±1.51a | 73.69±1.64a | 1.64±0.43ef | |
萌芽期 In germination | 1/3刻芽 | 89.97±1.15bc | 6.19±1.15abc | 9.13±0.75e | 84.68±1.08ab | 73.51±1.51a | 3.03±0.54de |
2/3刻芽 | 93.96±2.09ab | 7.86±0.93a | 18.63±1.63ab | 73.51±2.50d | 65.34±1.77bc | 7.51±0.88a | |
环割 | 80.45±1.33d | 5.68±0.83abc | 13.93±2.16bcde | 80.39±1.85abc | 61.29±1.40cd | 7.35±0.71a | |
萌芽后 After germination | 1/3刻芽 | 88.96±1.78c | 4.02±0.36cde | 12.02±3.19cde | 83.96±3.40ab | 73.83±2.42a | 5.39±0.69bc |
2/3刻芽 | 90.06±1.04bc | 6.68±0.92abc | 15.31±1.35abcd | 78.00±1.97abc | 67.73±1.64b | 1.57±0.56ef | |
环割 | 89.69±0.49bc | 6.42±0.65abc | 14.66±2.01bcde | 79.22±1.92bcd | 66.54±1.02bc | 4.45±0.49bcd |
Table 1 Effects of bud-notching in different periods and width on bud germination and branching Korla fragrant pear
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 萌芽率 Germination rate(%) | 短枝率 Short shoot rate(%) | 中枝率 Medium shoot rate(%) | 长枝率 Long shoot rate(%) | 成枝率 Sprout rate(%) | 成花率 Flowering rate(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 78.76±1.66d | 7.51±0.51ab | 20.66±1.22a | 71.82±0.84d | 58.48±1.71d | 0.93±0.07f | |
萌芽前 Before germination | 1/3刻芽 | 87.72±1.50c | 1.97±0.99e | 16.70±1.81abcd | 81.33±2.53abc | 69.30±2.29ab | 5.71±0.57ab |
2/3刻芽 | 96.99±1.54a | 4.74±0.82bcd | 17.65±0.85abc | 77.61±1.73cd | 68.89±2.09ab | 3.65±0.62cd | |
环割 | 91.98±1.17bc | 2.22±1.05de | 11.17±0.71de | 86.61±1.51a | 73.69±1.64a | 1.64±0.43ef | |
萌芽期 In germination | 1/3刻芽 | 89.97±1.15bc | 6.19±1.15abc | 9.13±0.75e | 84.68±1.08ab | 73.51±1.51a | 3.03±0.54de |
2/3刻芽 | 93.96±2.09ab | 7.86±0.93a | 18.63±1.63ab | 73.51±2.50d | 65.34±1.77bc | 7.51±0.88a | |
环割 | 80.45±1.33d | 5.68±0.83abc | 13.93±2.16bcde | 80.39±1.85abc | 61.29±1.40cd | 7.35±0.71a | |
萌芽后 After germination | 1/3刻芽 | 88.96±1.78c | 4.02±0.36cde | 12.02±3.19cde | 83.96±3.40ab | 73.83±2.42a | 5.39±0.69bc |
2/3刻芽 | 90.06±1.04bc | 6.68±0.92abc | 15.31±1.35abcd | 78.00±1.97abc | 67.73±1.64b | 1.57±0.56ef | |
环割 | 89.69±0.49bc | 6.42±0.65abc | 14.66±2.01bcde | 79.22±1.92bcd | 66.54±1.02bc | 4.45±0.49bcd |
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 新梢长度 New shoot length(cm) | 枝长增量 Branches length incremental (cm) | 新梢粗度 Thickness of new(mm) | 枝粗增量 Branches thick incremental (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6月10日 June 10th | 7月15日 July 15th | 6月10日 June 10th | 7月15日 July 15th | ||||
CK | 34.22±1.99d | 38.82±2.08c | 4.60±0.32cd | 5.24±0.59b | 6.98±0.14c | 1.74±0.09abc | |
萌芽前 Before germination | 1/3刻芽 | 40.17±0.21abc | 45.32±1.69ab | 5.15±1.53cd | 5.66±0.10ab | 7.41±0.14bc | 1.74±0.11abc |
2/3刻芽 | 36.60±1.96c | 44.25±2.35bc | 7.65±0.48abc | 5.38±0.11a | 7.04±0.2c | 1.66±0.11bc | |
环割 | 43.63±2.26ab | 48.62±2.21ab | 4.99±0.36cd | 5.80±0.20ab | 7.23±0.22bc | 1.43±0.22c | |
萌芽期 In germination | 1/3刻芽 | 46.07±2.29a | 50.83±1.99a | 4.76±1.33cd | 5.73±0.13ab | 7.81±0.17ab | 2.08±0.06abc |
2/3刻芽 | 41.00±2.48abc | 45.45±1.75ab | 4.45±0.73d | 5.53±0.11ab | 7.22±0.17bc | 1.69±0.08bc | |
环割 | 43.21±1.81ab | 49.49±1.42ab | 6.27±0.52bcd | 5.81±0.36a | 8.09±0.19a | 2.28±0.25ab | |
萌芽后 After germination | 1/3刻芽 | 41.36±0.38abc | 49.95±1.52ab | 8.58±1.18ab | 5.73±0.02ab | 7.79±0.16ab | 2.05±0.13abc |
2/3刻芽 | 44.13±1.11ab | 51.09±2.23a | 6.96±1.23abcd | 5.48±0.11ab | 7.88±0.22ab | 2.39±0.16a | |
环割 | 38.05±2.48bc | 47.66±1.79ab | 9.61±0.79a | 5.48±0.17ab | 7.37±0.34bc | 1.89±0.45abc |
Table 2 Effects of bud-notching in different periods and width on the new shoot Korla fragrant pear
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 新梢长度 New shoot length(cm) | 枝长增量 Branches length incremental (cm) | 新梢粗度 Thickness of new(mm) | 枝粗增量 Branches thick incremental (mm) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6月10日 June 10th | 7月15日 July 15th | 6月10日 June 10th | 7月15日 July 15th | ||||
CK | 34.22±1.99d | 38.82±2.08c | 4.60±0.32cd | 5.24±0.59b | 6.98±0.14c | 1.74±0.09abc | |
萌芽前 Before germination | 1/3刻芽 | 40.17±0.21abc | 45.32±1.69ab | 5.15±1.53cd | 5.66±0.10ab | 7.41±0.14bc | 1.74±0.11abc |
2/3刻芽 | 36.60±1.96c | 44.25±2.35bc | 7.65±0.48abc | 5.38±0.11a | 7.04±0.2c | 1.66±0.11bc | |
环割 | 43.63±2.26ab | 48.62±2.21ab | 4.99±0.36cd | 5.80±0.20ab | 7.23±0.22bc | 1.43±0.22c | |
萌芽期 In germination | 1/3刻芽 | 46.07±2.29a | 50.83±1.99a | 4.76±1.33cd | 5.73±0.13ab | 7.81±0.17ab | 2.08±0.06abc |
2/3刻芽 | 41.00±2.48abc | 45.45±1.75ab | 4.45±0.73d | 5.53±0.11ab | 7.22±0.17bc | 1.69±0.08bc | |
环割 | 43.21±1.81ab | 49.49±1.42ab | 6.27±0.52bcd | 5.81±0.36a | 8.09±0.19a | 2.28±0.25ab | |
萌芽后 After germination | 1/3刻芽 | 41.36±0.38abc | 49.95±1.52ab | 8.58±1.18ab | 5.73±0.02ab | 7.79±0.16ab | 2.05±0.13abc |
2/3刻芽 | 44.13±1.11ab | 51.09±2.23a | 6.96±1.23abcd | 5.48±0.11ab | 7.88±0.22ab | 2.39±0.16a | |
环割 | 38.05±2.48bc | 47.66±1.79ab | 9.61±0.79a | 5.48±0.17ab | 7.37±0.34bc | 1.89±0.45abc |
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 叶柄长 Petiole length (mm) | 叶柄粗 Thick petiole (mm) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 百叶鲜重 Fresh weight of louver (g) | 百叶干重 Dry weight of louver (g) | 叶绿素 SPAD值 Chlorophyll SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 25.35±1.01b | 1.54±0.03a | 8.22±0.35e | 5.35±0.18b | 32.57±1.14f | 128.77±1.79e | 49.82±1.13d | 46.23±0.68e | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 24.31±0.13b | 1.54±0.05a | 9.05±0.33cde | 5.62±0.19ab | 33.80±0.18f | 134.31±1.50d | 51.74±2.14c | 51.23±0.22a |
90° | 27.13±2.66ab | 1.52±0.08a | 9.49±0.11bcd | 5.99±0.09ab | 37.88±0.52de | 145.42±1.75bc | 61.58±1.92ab | 50.10±0.17a | |
110° | 27.37±0.74ab | 1.60±0.07a | 10.66±0.31a | 6.21±0.26a | 44.25±0.57a | 135.67±2.23d | 59.32±0.89b | 50.20±0.35a | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 30.27±2.38ab | 1.62±0.07a | 9.88±0.23abc | 6.16±0.04a | 40.56±0.35cd | 150.14±1.64b | 65.36±0.55a | 47.53±0.34d |
90° | 27.70±0.54ab | 1.50±0.09a | 8.58±0.59e | 6.33±0.38a | 41.24±1.53bc | 155.64±1.71a | 65.54±2.18a | 49.30±0.66ab | |
110° | 32.19±2.98a | 1.44±0.12a | 9.09±0.17cde | 6.09±0.25a | 36.98±1.07e | 144.37±2.32c | 58.62±0.16b | 48.20±0.10bcd | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 30.02±3.01ab | 1.49±0.06a | 10.27±0.32ab | 5.94±0.27ab | 40.77±0.77bc | 137.67±1.62d | 52.82±1.13c | 48.93±0.68abc |
90° | 30.04±1.09ab | 1.51±0.11a | 10.66±0.35a | 6.13±0.08a | 43.51±1.04ab | 159.26±1.46a | 62.33±0.96ab | 49.07±0.27abc | |
110° | 26.15±0.78b | 1.50±0.01a | 9.99±0.50abc | 6.02±0.16ab | 40.19±0.95cd | 156.53±1.96a | 60.76±1.52b | 47.73±0.33cd |
Table 3 Effects of branch-bending in different periods and stretching angles on leaf Korla fragrant pear
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 叶柄长 Petiole length (mm) | 叶柄粗 Thick petiole (mm) | 叶长 Leaf length (cm) | 叶宽 Leaf width (cm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (cm2) | 百叶鲜重 Fresh weight of louver (g) | 百叶干重 Dry weight of louver (g) | 叶绿素 SPAD值 Chlorophyll SPAD value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 25.35±1.01b | 1.54±0.03a | 8.22±0.35e | 5.35±0.18b | 32.57±1.14f | 128.77±1.79e | 49.82±1.13d | 46.23±0.68e | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 24.31±0.13b | 1.54±0.05a | 9.05±0.33cde | 5.62±0.19ab | 33.80±0.18f | 134.31±1.50d | 51.74±2.14c | 51.23±0.22a |
90° | 27.13±2.66ab | 1.52±0.08a | 9.49±0.11bcd | 5.99±0.09ab | 37.88±0.52de | 145.42±1.75bc | 61.58±1.92ab | 50.10±0.17a | |
110° | 27.37±0.74ab | 1.60±0.07a | 10.66±0.31a | 6.21±0.26a | 44.25±0.57a | 135.67±2.23d | 59.32±0.89b | 50.20±0.35a | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 30.27±2.38ab | 1.62±0.07a | 9.88±0.23abc | 6.16±0.04a | 40.56±0.35cd | 150.14±1.64b | 65.36±0.55a | 47.53±0.34d |
90° | 27.70±0.54ab | 1.50±0.09a | 8.58±0.59e | 6.33±0.38a | 41.24±1.53bc | 155.64±1.71a | 65.54±2.18a | 49.30±0.66ab | |
110° | 32.19±2.98a | 1.44±0.12a | 9.09±0.17cde | 6.09±0.25a | 36.98±1.07e | 144.37±2.32c | 58.62±0.16b | 48.20±0.10bcd | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 30.02±3.01ab | 1.49±0.06a | 10.27±0.32ab | 5.94±0.27ab | 40.77±0.77bc | 137.67±1.62d | 52.82±1.13c | 48.93±0.68abc |
90° | 30.04±1.09ab | 1.51±0.11a | 10.66±0.35a | 6.13±0.08a | 43.51±1.04ab | 159.26±1.46a | 62.33±0.96ab | 49.07±0.27abc | |
110° | 26.15±0.78b | 1.50±0.01a | 9.99±0.50abc | 6.02±0.16ab | 40.19±0.95cd | 156.53±1.96a | 60.76±1.52b | 47.73±0.33cd |
时期 Period | 处理Treatment | 枝长Branch length (cm) | 枝粗 Branch thickness (mm) | 成花率 Flowering rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 105.01±2.93a | 13.75±0.34b | 4.40±0.18e | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 91.01±1.82bcd | 14.06±0.48b | 4.90±0.33de |
90° | 85.32±1.15d | 14.08±0.15b | 5.48±0.22cd | |
110° | 87.55±1.64cd | 13.75±0.12b | 1.48±0.14f | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 96.19±2.86b | 14.70±0.56ab | 4.90±0.22de |
90° | 92.96±3.82bc | 15.13±0.46ab | 5.60±0.30cd | |
110° | 94.17±1.28bc | 14.43±0.63ab | 6.44±0.17c | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 97.65±1.42b | 15.02±0.19ab | 9.46±0.42b |
90° | 84.54±2.63d | 15.51±0.40a | 15.48±0.48a | |
110° | 91.03±3.20bcd | 14.95±0.43ab | 4.66±0.46de |
Table 4 Effects of branch-bending in different periods and stretching angles on branches and flowering rate of Korla fragrant pear
时期 Period | 处理Treatment | 枝长Branch length (cm) | 枝粗 Branch thickness (mm) | 成花率 Flowering rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 105.01±2.93a | 13.75±0.34b | 4.40±0.18e | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 91.01±1.82bcd | 14.06±0.48b | 4.90±0.33de |
90° | 85.32±1.15d | 14.08±0.15b | 5.48±0.22cd | |
110° | 87.55±1.64cd | 13.75±0.12b | 1.48±0.14f | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 96.19±2.86b | 14.70±0.56ab | 4.90±0.22de |
90° | 92.96±3.82bc | 15.13±0.46ab | 5.60±0.30cd | |
110° | 94.17±1.28bc | 14.43±0.63ab | 6.44±0.17c | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 97.65±1.42b | 15.02±0.19ab | 9.46±0.42b |
90° | 84.54±2.63d | 15.51±0.40a | 15.48±0.48a | |
110° | 91.03±3.20bcd | 14.95±0.43ab | 4.66±0.46de |
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 净光合速率Pn (μmol/(m2·s) | 气孔导度Gs (mol/(m2·s) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci(μL/L) | 蒸腾速率Tr (mol/m2·s) | 水分利用效率EWU (mmol/mol) | 气孔限制值 Ls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5.04±0.42e | 0.05±0.00b | 201.25±3.95a | 1.92±0.35a | 2.78±0.26de | 0.49±0.24f | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 6.94±0.38cd | 0.05±0.01b | 170.29±3.32c | 1.95±0.05a | 3.57±0.13c | 0.65±0.01abc |
90° | 7.54±0.21bc | 0.06±0.01a | 153.80±1.65d | 2.10±0.04a | 3.59±0.09c | 0.57±0.01de | |
110° | 6.37±0.18d | 0.05±0.01b | 139.67±3.42e | 2.16±0.03a | 2.94±0.05d | 0.62±0.03bcd | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 5.21±0.08e | 0.05±0.01b | 179.57±3.06b | 2.02±0.02a | 2.59±0.05e | 0.54±0.02ef |
90° | 7.37±0.13bc | 0.06±0.01a | 165.17±2.72c | 2.11±0.04a | 3.51±0.08c | 0.58±0.03de | |
110° | 7.72±0.11b | 0.05±0.01b | 114.55±1.50f | 1.97±0.01a | 3.92±0.05b | 0.71±0.03a | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 6.36±0.17d | 0.05±0.00b | 162.26±1.97c | 1.90±0.03a | 3.35±0.07c | 0.59±0.02cde |
90° | 9.55±0.11a | 0.06±0.00a | 133.49±2.92e | 2.09±0.03a | 4.59±0.11a | 0.66±0.01ab | |
110° | 6.88±0.27cd | 0.05±0.00b | 132.38±2.78e | 1.87±0.02a | 3.67±0.13bc | 0.66±0.02ab |
Table 5 Effects of branch-bending in different periods and stretching angles on photosynthetic characteristics of Korla fragrant pear leaves
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 净光合速率Pn (μmol/(m2·s) | 气孔导度Gs (mol/(m2·s) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci(μL/L) | 蒸腾速率Tr (mol/m2·s) | 水分利用效率EWU (mmol/mol) | 气孔限制值 Ls |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5.04±0.42e | 0.05±0.00b | 201.25±3.95a | 1.92±0.35a | 2.78±0.26de | 0.49±0.24f | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 6.94±0.38cd | 0.05±0.01b | 170.29±3.32c | 1.95±0.05a | 3.57±0.13c | 0.65±0.01abc |
90° | 7.54±0.21bc | 0.06±0.01a | 153.80±1.65d | 2.10±0.04a | 3.59±0.09c | 0.57±0.01de | |
110° | 6.37±0.18d | 0.05±0.01b | 139.67±3.42e | 2.16±0.03a | 2.94±0.05d | 0.62±0.03bcd | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 5.21±0.08e | 0.05±0.01b | 179.57±3.06b | 2.02±0.02a | 2.59±0.05e | 0.54±0.02ef |
90° | 7.37±0.13bc | 0.06±0.01a | 165.17±2.72c | 2.11±0.04a | 3.51±0.08c | 0.58±0.03de | |
110° | 7.72±0.11b | 0.05±0.01b | 114.55±1.50f | 1.97±0.01a | 3.92±0.05b | 0.71±0.03a | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 6.36±0.17d | 0.05±0.00b | 162.26±1.97c | 1.90±0.03a | 3.35±0.07c | 0.59±0.02cde |
90° | 9.55±0.11a | 0.06±0.00a | 133.49±2.92e | 2.09±0.03a | 4.59±0.11a | 0.66±0.01ab | |
110° | 6.88±0.27cd | 0.05±0.00b | 132.38±2.78e | 1.87±0.02a | 3.67±0.13bc | 0.66±0.02ab |
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 初始荧光Fo | 最大荧光Fm | PSⅡ最大光能 转化效率Fv/Fm | PSⅡ潜在光化学 活性Fv/Fo | PSⅡ实际光化学 效率ΦPSⅡ | 光化学淬灭 系数qP | 非光化学淬灭 系数NPQ | 表观光合电子 传递效率RET |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 101.75±0.63de | 660.25±4.28d | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.79±0.27cd | 0.62±0.03a | 0.90±0.05ab | 1.55±0.08ab | 1.98±0.05b | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 115.25±0.48bc | 676.25±4.72c | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.87±0.05cd | 0.46±0.02cde | 0.84±0.06bc | 1.70±0.12a | 2.09±0.03b |
90° | 99.25±2.06e | 658.50±5.78de | 0.85±0.01a | 5.64±0.15ab | 0.34±0.04f | 0.44±0.04e | 0.44±0.05e | 1.90±0.09bc | |
110° | 102.00±0.71de | 697.50±1.50b | 0.85±0.01a | 5.84±0.03a | 0.60±0.02a | 0.89±0.01ab | 1.05±0.09d | 3.01±0.02a | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 123.75±3.47a | 682.00±7.15c | 0.82±0.01b | 4.52±0.12d | 0.52±0.02bc | 0.97±0.01a | 1.56±0.08ab | 2.02±0.04b |
90° | 119.75±1.84ab | 707.25±5.34b | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.97±0.32cd | 0.40±0.01ef | 0.66±0.01d | 1.35±0.04bcd | 1.47±0.05e | |
110° | 113.00±2.42bc | 667.50±7.96cd | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.92±0.18cd | 0.48±0.01bcd | 0.82±0.03bc | 1.43±0.05abc | 1.73±0.07cd | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 113.25±3.35bc | 705.00±2.89b | 0.84±0.02ab | 5.25±0.21bc | 0.49±0.01bc | 0.79±0.03c | 1.37±0.01bc | 1.60±0.07de |
90° | 108.50±3.97cd | 646.00±3.34e | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.98±0.20cd | 0.54±0.03b | 0.95±0.01a | 1.58±0.20ab | 1.77±0.09cd | |
110° | 115.75±1.65bc | 725.75±3.07a | 0.84±0.01bc | 5.27±0.08bc | 0.42±0.02de | 0.63±0.02d | 1.17±0.10cd | 1.67±0.07d |
Table 6 Comparison of fluorescence parameters of Korla pear leaves with different stretching angles in different periods
时期 Period | 处理 Treatment | 初始荧光Fo | 最大荧光Fm | PSⅡ最大光能 转化效率Fv/Fm | PSⅡ潜在光化学 活性Fv/Fo | PSⅡ实际光化学 效率ΦPSⅡ | 光化学淬灭 系数qP | 非光化学淬灭 系数NPQ | 表观光合电子 传递效率RET |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 101.75±0.63de | 660.25±4.28d | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.79±0.27cd | 0.62±0.03a | 0.90±0.05ab | 1.55±0.08ab | 1.98±0.05b | |
6月3日 June 3 rd | 70° | 115.25±0.48bc | 676.25±4.72c | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.87±0.05cd | 0.46±0.02cde | 0.84±0.06bc | 1.70±0.12a | 2.09±0.03b |
90° | 99.25±2.06e | 658.50±5.78de | 0.85±0.01a | 5.64±0.15ab | 0.34±0.04f | 0.44±0.04e | 0.44±0.05e | 1.90±0.09bc | |
110° | 102.00±0.71de | 697.50±1.50b | 0.85±0.01a | 5.84±0.03a | 0.60±0.02a | 0.89±0.01ab | 1.05±0.09d | 3.01±0.02a | |
6月13日 June 13 th | 70° | 123.75±3.47a | 682.00±7.15c | 0.82±0.01b | 4.52±0.12d | 0.52±0.02bc | 0.97±0.01a | 1.56±0.08ab | 2.02±0.04b |
90° | 119.75±1.84ab | 707.25±5.34b | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.97±0.32cd | 0.40±0.01ef | 0.66±0.01d | 1.35±0.04bcd | 1.47±0.05e | |
110° | 113.00±2.42bc | 667.50±7.96cd | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.92±0.18cd | 0.48±0.01bcd | 0.82±0.03bc | 1.43±0.05abc | 1.73±0.07cd | |
6月23日 June 23 rd | 70° | 113.25±3.35bc | 705.00±2.89b | 0.84±0.02ab | 5.25±0.21bc | 0.49±0.01bc | 0.79±0.03c | 1.37±0.01bc | 1.60±0.07de |
90° | 108.50±3.97cd | 646.00±3.34e | 0.83±0.01ab | 4.98±0.20cd | 0.54±0.03b | 0.95±0.01a | 1.58±0.20ab | 1.77±0.09cd | |
110° | 115.75±1.65bc | 725.75±3.07a | 0.84±0.01bc | 5.27±0.08bc | 0.42±0.02de | 0.63±0.02d | 1.17±0.10cd | 1.67±0.07d |
[1] | 马建江, 张萍, 薛根生. 库尔勒香梨生产现状与发展对策[J]. 北方园艺, 2015,(16):170-173. |
MA Jianjiang, ZAHNG Ping, XUE Gensheng. Productive status and developing countermeasure of Korla fragrant pears[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2015,(16):170-173. | |
[2] | 李雪薇, 李丙智, 刘富庭, 等. 刻芽、扭枝和去顶梢对富士苹果枝条导水率、激素含量和花芽形成的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(17):3643-3650. |
LI Xuewei, LI Bingzhi, LIU Futing, et al. Effects of bud-notching, twisting shoot and removing terminal shoot on branches hydraulic conductivity, hormone content and flower bud formation of Fuji apple[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(17):3643-3650. | |
[3] | 韩明玉, 李永武, 范崇辉, 等. 拉枝角度对富士苹果树生理特性和果实品质的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2008,(9):1345-1350. |
HAN Mingyu, LI Yongwu, FAN Chonghui, et al. Effects of branch bending angle on physiological characteristics and fruit quality of Fuji apple[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008,(9):1345-1350. | |
[4] | 吴鲜亮, 何志爱, 杨勇. 拉枝对苹果梨幼树生长发育的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业科技, 2008,(1):54-55,57. |
WU Xianliang, HE Zhiai, YANG Yong. The effect of pulling branches on the growth and development of young apple pear trees[J]. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2008,(1):54-55,57. | |
[5] | 张建光, 张江红, 许建锋, 等. 刻芽对黄冠梨高接树萌芽和成枝的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2010,(4):26-28. |
ZHANG Jianguang, ZHANG Jianghong, XU Jianfeng, et al. The effect of carving buds on the budding and branching of Huangguan pear trees[J]. China Fruits, 2010,(4):26-28. | |
[6] | 于祎飞, 滕慧颖, 刘雯斐, 等. 红国光苹果拉枝和刻芽的树体整形效应[J]. 河北农业科学, 2019, 23(1):37-40. |
YU Yifei, TENG Huiying, LIU Wenfei, et al. Effects of branch-bending and bud-notching on red Guoguang apple[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 23(1):37-40. | |
[7] | 苏艳丽, 李秀根, 杨健, 等. 刻芽与扭枝对梨不同优系成枝力和成花数的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2017, 35(2):105-109. |
SU Yanli, LI Xiugen, YANG Jian, et al. Effects of bud-notching and shoot-twisting on branching ability and flower number in different superior pear lines[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2017, 35(2):105-109. | |
[8] | 张雲慧, 李文胜, 周文静, 等. 修剪技术对分层纺锤形红富士苹果树体生长发育及果实品质的影响[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2018, 41(7):13-16. |
ZAHNG Yunhui, LI Wensheng, ZHOU Wenjing, et al. Effects of pruning techniques on the growth and development and fruit quality of the layered spindle-shaped Red Fuji apple[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2018, 41(7):13-16. | |
[9] | 位杰, 蒋媛, 马建江, 等. 拉枝角度对库尔勒香梨枝叶生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(3):111-116. |
WEI Jie, JIANG Yuan, MA Jianjiang, et al. Effects of branch bending angle on the branch and leaf growth and fruit quality of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(3):111-116. | |
[10] | 徐贵轩, 李宏建, 宋哲, 等. 不同拉枝角度对“望山红”苹果果实品质和枝类特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2011,(20):24-26. |
XU Guixaun, LI Hongjian, SONG Zhe, et al. Effects of branch bending angle on fruit quality and branch character of 'Wangshanhong' apple[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011,(20):24-26. | |
[11] | 廖立安, 李志光, 曹建明. 翠冠梨引种试验及整形拉枝对其经济性状的影响[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003, (2):79-81. |
LIAO Lian, LI Zhiguang, CAO Jianming. Introduction experiment of Cuiguan pear and effect of trimming the branches on its economic properties[J]. Journal of Central South Forestry University, 2003,(2):79-81. | |
[12] | 李晓龙, 王超, 李甲明, 等. 拉枝处理对‘翠冠’梨成花的影响及其调控机制[J]. 西北植物学报, 2015, 35(1):89-97. |
LI Xiaolong, WANG Chao, LI Jiaming, et al. Effect and regulation mechanism of branch-drooping on flower bud formation of Cuiguan pear[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2015, 35(1):89-97. | |
[13] | 王涛, 徐小菊, 张一晨. 翠冠梨幼树拉枝试验[J]. 浙江柑桔, 2004, 21(3):36-37. |
WANG Tao, XU Xiaoju, ZHANG Yichen. Branch pull test of Cuiguan pear young tree[J]. Zhejiang Ganju, 2004, 21(3):36-37. | |
[14] | 田长平, 张福兴, 孙庆田, 等. 普洛马林和刻芽处理对2年生樱桃幼树分枝特性的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(2):75-77. |
TIAN Changping, ZAHNG Fuxing, SUN Qingtian, et al. Influence of promalin and bud-notching treatment on branching character of 2-Year-Old cherry trees[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 45(2):75-77. | |
[15] | 柴全喜, 宋素智, 张彦武. 红铃铛山楂幼树刻芽发枝效果试验[J]. 落叶果树, 2016, 48(6):15-16. |
CHAI Quanxi, SONG Suzhi, ZHANG Yanwu. Test on the effect of cutting buds and branches of young red bell hawthorn trees[J]. Deciduous Fruits, 2016, 48(6):15-16. | |
[16] | 姜英林, 冯霄汉. 刻芽与药剂处理对三季梨萌芽成枝的影响[J]. 中国园艺文摘, 2017, 33(9): 54,87. |
JIANG Yinglin, FENG Xiaohan. Effects of carving bud and applyingchemical on germination and branching ability of Dr. Jules. Guyot [J]. Chinese Horticulture Abstracts, 2017, 33(9): 54,87. | |
[17] | 冯毓琴, 张永茂, 李翠红, 等. 拉枝角度对‘烟富6号’苹果树生长、生理特性及果实品质的影响[J]. 中国果树, 2016,(6):1-7. |
FENG Yuqin, ZHANG Yongmao, LI Cuihong, et al. Effect of branch angle on the growth, physiological characteristics and fruit quality of apple tree 'Yanfu 6'[J]. China Fruits, 2016,(6):1-7. | |
[18] | 李美美, 马华冰, 任俊杰, 等. 修剪方式对核桃生理特性影响的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(1):108-115. |
LI Meimei, MA Huabing, REN Junjie, et al. Effects of pruning methods on physiological characteristics of walnut[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2015, 30(1):108-115. | |
[19] | 蔡华成, 王芸芸, 杨廷桢, 等. 拉枝角度对‘SH1’矮化中间砧‘富士’苹果幼树生长和结果的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(10):78-82. |
CAI Huacheng, WANG Yunyun, YANG Tingzhen, et al. Effect of branch angle on growth and fruit of 'Fuji' apple trees in 'SH1' dwarfing interstock[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(10):78-82. | |
[20] | Zhang B B, Xu J L, Zhou M, et al. Effect of light quality on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of peach (Prunus persica L. Batch)[J]. Photosynthetica, 2018. |
[21] | 高建国. 红富士苹果树生长季修剪关键技术[J]. 西北园艺(果树), 2005,(2):44. |
GAO Jianguo. Key pruning techniques of Red Fuji apple tree in growing season[J]. Northwest Horticulture, 2005,(2):44. | |
[22] | 罗达, 宋锋惠, 史彦江, 等. 不同年龄枝条修剪对平欧杂种榛生长、光合及结实特性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(5):87-93. |
LUO Da, SONG Fenghui, SHI Yanjiang, et al. Effects of the pruning the branches with different ages on the growth, photosynjournal and fruiting characteristics of Corylus heterophylla×Corylus avellana[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(5):87-93. | |
[23] | Asada T, Arakawa O. The analysis of light interception and leaf area index (LAI) in central Leader‘Fuji/M26’and Jonagold/26 apple orchards producing high yields and quality fruit[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2000, 525:421-423. |
[24] |
Mierowska A, Keutgen N, Huysamer M, et al. Photosynthetic acclimation of apple spur leaves to summer-pruning[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2002, 92(1):9-27.
DOI URL |
[25] | 王强, 张茂君, 闫兴凯, 等. 秋季不同时期秋子梨品种及野生类型叶绿素荧光特性研究[J]. 北方园艺, 2011,(17):1-3. |
WANG Qiang, ZHANG Maojun, YAN Xingkai, et al. Study of chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics on the pear cultivars and wild type of pyrus ussuriensis during different periods in autumn[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2011,(17):1-3. | |
[26] |
Rohacek K. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: the definitions, photosynthetic meaning, and mutual relationships[J]. Photosynthetica, 2002, 40(1):13-29.
DOI URL |
[27] | 艾沙江·买买提, 阿布都外力·木米尼, 王晶晶, 等. 富士苹果短截、拉枝对当年生新梢叶片光合特性的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(6):126-131. |
Maimaiti Aishajiang, Mumini Abuduwaili, WANG Jingjing, et al. Effects of cutting back and branch-bending on photosynthetic characteristics of new shoots[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2013, 18(6):126-131. |
[1] | JIN Juan, LI lili, YANG Lei, FAN Dingyu, HAO Qing. Analysis on the Development status of Xinjiang Jujube Industry [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 106-110. |
[2] | ZHANG Zheng, WEI Jia, GUO Wenli, XU Mingqiang, MA Yan, XU Bin, ZHAO Zhixia, YUAN Yuyao, MENG Xintao, WEI Nan, WU Bin. Development Status and Demand of Preservation and Processing Industry of Prunes in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 111-115. |
[3] | SHEN Xiaohe, ZHU Zhanjiang, YANG Liling, LIU Jia, Abulizi Basiti. Current situation and development suggestions of wine grape mechanization in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 147-152. |
[4] | YAN Manman, JIANG Tingting, ZHENG Feng. Practice and discussion on education and training of young managers in agricultural research institutes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 181-185. |
[5] | XU Le, XIAO Hailong, ZHA Zhihao, YANG Haoran, LIU Tingting, CHEN Keke, DING Wanyue, WANG Penghao, Renaguli Yunusi. Analysis of the current situation of cooperation between research institutes and universities [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 186-190. |
[6] | WANG Fang, ZHANG Qiong, YUE Rongqiang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. On the construction of characteristic brands of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 251-255. |
[7] | YUE Rongqiang, ZHANG Qiong, WANG Fang, DENG Wenwen, CHEN Yu, Maiwulanjiang Mamut, Nurmanquli Batur. Improve the academic quality and influence of agricultural academic journals [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(S1): 256-260. |
[8] | ZHANG Zehua, YE Hanchun, WANG Zhenhua, LI Wenhao, LI Haiqiang, LIU Jian. Effects of equal nitrogen applied with urease inhibitor on cotton growth, yield, and quality under mulched drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2103-2111. |
[9] | WANG Chao, XU Wenxiu, LI Pengcheng, ZHENG Cangsong, SUN Miao, FENG Weina, SHAO Jingjing, DONG Helin. Response of cotton seedling growth and development to soil available potassium levels [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2132-2139. |
[10] | ZHANG Niao, WANG Hui, FENG Guojun, Zaituniguli Kuerban. Study on the agronomic traits and quality differences of grain sorghum in Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2160-2167. |
[11] | ZHANG Fan, CHEN Xiaolu, WANG Jie, HOU Xianfei, JIA Donghai, GU Yuanguo, MIAO Haocui, LI Qiang. Effects of mixed salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of peanut seed [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(9): 2168-2182. |
[12] | ZHANG Chengjie, HU Haoran, DUAN Songjiang, WU Yifan, ZHANG Jusong. Effects of nitrogen-dense interaction on growth, development, yield and quality of Gossypium barbadense L. [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1821-1830. |
[13] | CHEN Fang, LI Zihui, WANG Bingyue, SUN Xiaogui, ZHANG Tingjun. Effects of microbial inoculants on growth and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1853-1860. |
[14] | WANG Qingpeng, YAN Chengcai, WANG Zhe, GOU Changqing, WANG Lan, FENG Hongzu, HAO Haiting. Anther bacterial diversity of Korla Fragrant Pear before and after flowering [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 1976-1982. |
[15] | LAI Chengxia, YANG Yanlong, LI Chunping, Mayila Yusuyin, WANG Yan, YANG Dong, YANG Ni, GE Fengwei, WANG Penglong, MA Jun. Biological characteristics and chemical control of defoliating cotton Verticillium wilt [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 61(8): 2034-2042. |
Viewed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full text 64
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Abstract 109
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||