无人机飞防助剂和杀虫剂组合对其雾滴沉降特性及棉蚜防效的影响

doi:10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.017

新疆农业科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 62 ›› Issue (4): 929-935.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2025.04.017

• 园艺特产·林业·农产品加工工程 • 上一篇下一篇

无人机飞防助剂和杀虫剂组合对其雾滴沉降特性及棉蚜防效的影响

薛钦元¹(), 张建良², 李鹏飞¹, 冯宏祖¹, 武刚³, 王兰¹()

1.塔里木大学/南疆农业有害生物综合治理兵团重点实验室/塔里木盆地生物资源保护利用兵团重点实验室,新疆阿拉尔 843300
2.新疆生产建设兵团第一师三团农业发展服务中心,新疆阿拉尔 843300
3.新疆生产建设兵团第一师农业科学研究所,新疆阿拉尔 843300

收稿日期:2024-09-29 出版日期:2025-04-20 发布日期:2025-06-20
通信作者: 王兰(1968-),女,山东招远人,教授,博士,硕士生/博士生导师,研究方向为植物保护,(E-mail)wang-lan95@163.com
作者简介:薛钦元(2002-),男,河南焦作人,硕士研究生,研究方向为果树绿色防控,(E-mail)1185225695@qq.com
基金资助:
新疆生产建设兵团财政科技计划(2021DB008);新疆生产建设兵团科技创新人才计划(2022CB004-01);喀什地区科技计划项目(KS2024002)

Effects of different combinations of drone flight defense agents and additives on their droplet deposition parameters and field spraying control of cotton aphids

XUE Qinyuan¹(), ZHANG Jianliang², LI Pengfei¹, FENG Hongzu¹, WU Gang³, WANG Lan¹()

1. Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps in Southern Xinjiang /Key Laboratory of Protection and Utilization of Biological Resources in Tarim Basin, Tarim University, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
2. Agricultural Development Center of the Third Regiment of the First Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China
3. The Institute of Agricultural Sciences of the First Agricultural Production Division of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Aral Xinjiang 843300, China

Received:2024-09-29 Published:2025-04-20 Online:2025-06-20
Supported by:
Financial S & T Program Project of XPCC(2021DB008);S & T Innovation Talent Program Project of XPCC(2022CB004-01);Kashgar Science and Technology Plan Project(KS2024002)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】筛选新疆棉田防治棉蚜的最佳药剂与助剂组台,探究其对无人机变量施药防治效果,为无人机精准变量施药防控棉蚜提供依据。【方法】通过田间药效试验,比较不同药剂添加5种喷雾助剂后对棉蚜防效,同时依据试验地生成的处方图开展棉田无人机变量施药作业,测定20%螺虫乙酯·呋虫胺悬浮剂添加倍达通后的理化性质和无人机变量施药防治棉蚜的效果。【结果】20%螺虫乙酯·呋虫胺悬浮剂添加倍达通的防效最高,药后7 d,虫口减退率达到86%,22%噻虫·高氯氟添加倍达通次之,为81%,二者差异不显著,但与其余处理之间有明显差异(P<0.05);无人机变量喷施20%螺虫乙酯·呋虫胺悬浮剂与倍达通组合在4个蚜害等级区均有较好的防治效果,其中危害程度4级、用药量为30 L/hm²时的防效最佳,药后7 d,虫口减退率达到91.14%,其药液覆盖率、雾滴密度分布均匀度和雾滴密度分别为133%、87%和26.28个/cm²,与其他处理有显著差异(P<0.05)。【结论】无人机喷施杀虫剂防治棉蚜的药剂和助剂的最佳组合是20%螺虫乙酯·呋虫胺悬浮剂添加倍达通助剂,当危害程度达到4级、用药量30 L/hm²时的变量作业防治棉蚜的效果最佳。

关键词: 棉蚜; 助剂; 杀虫剂; 防效; 植保无人机; 变量施药

Abstract:

【Objective】 This project aims to screen the optimal combination of pesticides and adjuvants for cotton aphid control in Xinjiang cotton field and its impact on the variable application by plant protection unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). 【Methods】 Through the field efficacy experiment, the control effect of five spray auxiliaries added to different pesticides on Aphis gossypii was compared, and the physicochemical properties of 20% spirotetramat · dinotefuran suspension concentrate added with Beidatong and the control effect of UAV variable application on cotton aphids were measured. 【Results】 After adding 5 types of adjuvants, the control effect on Aphis gossypii was improved. Among them, 20% spirotetramat · dinotefuran suspension concentrate added with Beidatong had the strongest control effect, and the reduction rate of insect population reached 86% after 7 days of treatment, followed by the addition of 22% thiamethoxam·lambda-cyhalothrin suspension concentrate added with Beidatong, which was 81%. The difference between the two was not significant (P<0.05). According to the prescription map generated by the experimental site, the cotton field unmanned aerial vehicle variable spraying operation was carried out. The results showed that the combination of 20% spirotetramat · dinotefuran suspension concentrate added with Beidatong showed good control effects in four aphid infestation levels by UAV variable spraying. The optimal control effect was achieved when the level of harm was 4 and the dosage was 30 L/hm². After 7 days of treatment, the insect population reduction rate reached 91.14%, and the drug coverage rate, droplet density distribution uniformity, and droplet density were 133%, 87%, and 26.28 number/cm², respectively, with significant differences compared to other treatments (P<0.05). 【Conclusion】 The optimal combination of insecticides and adjuvants for the control of Aphis gossypii is 20% spirotetramat · dinotefuran suspension concentrate added with Beidatong by UAV. The variable operation with a hazard level of 4 has the best effect on the control of cotton aphids. The research results provide scientific basis for the precise application to control cotton aphids of variable pesticides by UAV variable spraying.

Key words: Aphis gossypii; adjuvants; pesticide; control effect; plant protection unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); variable spraying

中图分类号:

S482.3

薛钦元, 张建良, 李鹏飞, 冯宏祖, 武刚, 王兰. 无人机飞防助剂和杀虫剂组合对其雾滴沉降特性及棉蚜防效的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(4): 929-935.

XUE Qinyuan, ZHANG Jianliang, LI Pengfei, FENG Hongzu, WU Gang, WANG Lan. Effects of different combinations of drone flight defense agents and additives on their droplet deposition parameters and field spraying control of cotton aphids[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 62(4): 929-935.

图/表 8

参考文献 21

[1]	胡春雷, 李孝华, 王瑞霞, 等. 2023年棉花加工行业产业发展报告(下) [J]. 中国棉花加工, 2024, (2):4-11.
	HU Chunlei, LI Xiaohua, WANG Ruixia, et al. Report on Industrial Development of Cotton Processing Industry in 2023 (below)[J]. China Cotton Processing, 2024,(2):4-11.
[2]	张永孝, 赵之刚, 曹赤阳. 棉蚜为害损失与防治指标的研究[J]. 植物保护学报, 1982(4):229-236.
	ZHANG Yongxiao, ZHAO Zhigang, CAO Chiyang. Studies on the damage of cotton caused by Aphis gossypii Glover and the threshold for control[J]. Acta Phytophylacica Ainica, 1982(4):229-236
[3]	陈文静, 李海江, 吴文忠, 等. 苦参碱与常规化学农药对棉蚜的综合防控效果比较[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(6):1081-1089. DOI
	CHEN Wenjing, LI Haijiang, WU Wenzhong. et al. Comparison of comprehensive control effects of matrine and conventional chemical pesticides on Aphis gossypii Glover in northern Xinjiang[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(6):1081-1089. DOI
[4]	裴娟, 宋荣, 李晓旭. 5种新型农药对棉蚜的田间防效[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2024, 47(2):51-53.
	PEI Juan, SONG Rong, LI Xiaoxu. Field control effect of five new pesticides on cotton aphid[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Reclamation Science and Technology, 2024, 47(2):51-53.
[5]	朱九生, 乔雄梧, 樊建斌, 等. 新农药防治抗性棉蚜试验[J]. 山西农业科学, 1996,(2):44-47.
	ZHU Jiusheng, QIAO Xiongwu, FAN Jianbin, et al. Experiment on new pesticides to control resistant cotton aphid[J]. Shanxi Agricultural Science, 1996,(2):44-47.
[6]	叶树才, 董易之, 柳浩. 植保无人机喷施纳米农药制剂对水稻害虫的防效研究[J]. 现代农业科技, 2024(1):67-68,71.
	YE Shucai, DONG Yizhi, LIU Hao. Study on the effectiveness of nano-pesticide spraying on rice pests[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2024(1):67-68,71.
[7]	蒋小新. 植保无人机在农业生产中的推广应用[J]. 现代农机, 2023(3):3-5.
	JIANG Xiaoxin. Popularization and application of plant protection UAV in agricultural production[J]. Modern Agricultural Machinery, 2023(3):3-5.
[8]	李胜, 郭瑞俊. 无人机精准喷施技术在农业植保病虫草害防治方面的应用[J]. 农业工程技术, 2023, 43(26):40-41.
	LI Sheng, GUO Ruijun. The application of UAV precision spraying technology in the control of agricultural plant protection diseases and insect pests[J]. Agricultural Engineering Information, 2023, 43(26):40-41.
[9]	李鸿鹄. 无人机在农业植保中的应用研究[J]. 农场经济管理, 2023,(7):52-53.
	LI Honghu. Research on the application of UAV in agricultural plant protection[J]. Nongchang Jingji Guanli, 2023,(7):52-53.
[10]	王正宝. 农业机械智能化技术在农业生产中的应用策略[J]. 南方农机, 2024, 55(2):85-87.
	WANG Zhengbao. Application strategy of intelligent technology of agricultural machinery in agricultural production[J]. Agricultural Machinery and Agronomy, 2024, 55(2):85-87.
[11]	兰玉彬, 单常峰, 王庆雨, 等. 不同喷雾助剂在植保无人机喷施作业中对雾滴沉积特性的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2021, 37(16):31-38.
	LAN Yubin, DAN Changfeng, WANG Qingyu, et al. Effects of different spray additives on droplet deposition characteristics during plant protection UAV spraying operations[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2021, 37(16):31-38.
[12]	田志伟, 薛新宇, 崔龙飞, 等. 植保无人机昼夜作业的雾滴沉积特性及棉蚜防效对比[J]. 农业工程报, 2020, 36(5):69-77.
	TIAN Zhiwei, XUE Xinyu, CUI Longfei. Comparison of droplet deposition characteristics and Cotton aphid control effect of plant protection UAV working during the day and night[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE), 2020, 36(5): 69-77.
[13]	鹿秀云, 商俊燕, 邵美琪, 等. 棉铃疫病人工接种方法优化及应用[J]. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(1):1-12. DOI
	LU Xiuyun, SHANG Junyan, SHAO Meiqi, et al. Optimization and application of an artificial inoculation method for Cotton boll blight[J]. Cotton Science, 2021, 33(1):1-12.
[14]	华登科, 郑晓斌, 张友军, 等. 六种杀虫剂在保护地黄瓜冠层的沉积分布及其对蚜虫防治效果的影响[J]. 农药学学报, 2020, 22(2):353-361.
	Hua Dengke, Zheng Xiaobin, Zhang Youjun, et al. Deposition and distribution of six insecticides in greenhouse cucumber canopies and the impact on the control efficacy to Aphis gossypii[J]. Chinese Journal of Pesticide Science, 2020, 22(2):353-361.
[15]	于宁, 沙帅帅, 李国君. FR-200型植保无人机施药防治棉蚜效果试验[J]. 新疆农垦科技, 2019, 42(5):19-20.
	YU Ning, SHA Shuaishuai, LI Guoojun. Experimental study on the effect of FR-200 plant protection drone spraying pesticides to control cotton aphid[J]. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology, 2019, 42(5):19-20.
[16]	沙帅帅, 王喆, 肖海兵, 等. P20植保无人机作业参数优化及其施药对棉蚜防效评价[J]. 中国棉花, 2018, 45(1):6-8. DOI
	SHA Shuaishuai, WANG Zhe, XIAO Haibing, et al. Optimizing operation parameters of an unmanned aerial vehicle P20 and its application effects for spaying insecticides to control Cotton aphid[J]. China Cotton, 2018, 45(1):6-8. DOI
[17]	吴金龙, 冯宏祖, 马小艳, 等. 棉田棉蚜飞防药剂筛选及农药减量增效药效分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2020, 57(1):167-172. DOI
	WU Jinlong, FENG Hongzu, MA Xiaoyan, et al. Screening of fly control agents for cotton aphid in cotton fields in Xinjiang and preliminary report of pesticide reduction and efficiency improvement[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 57(1):167-172. DOI
[18]	刘明云, 魏书艳, 纪莲莲, 等. 无人机喷雾防治棉蚜药剂筛选及助剂增效作用研究[J]. 中国棉花, 2020, 47(2):9-12,17. DOI
	LIU Mingyun, WEI Shuyan, JI Lianlian, et al. Study on synergistic effect and efficacy of insecticides for controlling cotton aphids using unmanned aerial vehicle[J]. China Cotton, 2020, 47(2):9-12,17. DOI
[19]	王昌陵, 曾爱军, 何雄奎, 等. 风洞条件下植保无人机喷雾单元雾滴飘移特性试验[J]. 农业工程技术, 2020, 40(33):85.
	WANG Changling, ZENG Aijun, HE Xiongkui, et al. Spray drift characteristics test of unmanned aerial vehicle spray unit under wind tunnel conditions[J]. Int J Agric & Biol Eng, 2020; 13(3): 13-21.
[20]	张靖. 喷雾助剂提高农药对靶沉积性能与增效作用研究[D]. 甘肃农业大学, 2015.
	ZHANG Jing. Research on mechanism of enhancing deposition and synergistic effect of the spray adjuvants on pesticide[D]. Gansu Agricultural University, 2015.
[21]	资乐, 臧禹, 黄俊浩, 等. 植保无人机飞防助剂与杀虫剂配伍方式对其防治稻纵卷叶螟效果的影响[J]. 植物保护学报, 2023, 50(2):538-544.
	ZI Le, ZANG Yu, HUANG Junhao, et al. Effect of the compatibility of the flying control adjuvant and insecticide on the control effect of rice leaf roller[J]. Acta Plant Protection, 2023, 50(2):538-544.

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

阅读次数

全文

HTML			PDF

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版	最新录用	在线预览	正式出版
0	0	4	0	0	5

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	6	3
比例	67%	33%

摘要

最新录用	在线预览	正式出版

0	0	37

来源	本网站	其他网站

次数	13	24
比例	35%	65%

助剂名称 Name of additives	类型 Type	生产厂家 Manufacturer of a product
倍达通 Beidatong	甲基化植物油	河北明顺农业科技有限公司
农健飞 Nongjianfei	超支化聚合物	桂林集琦生化有限公司
奇功 Qigong	基于聚氧乙烯醚改性三硅氧烷	桂林集琦生化有限公司
倍倍加 Beibeijia	脂肪胺	桂林集琦生化有限公司
混合橙精油助剂 Mixed orange essential oil additive	高效植物精油	福建路易达孚公司

助剂名称 Name of additives	类型 Type	生产厂家 Manufacturer of a product
倍达通 Beidatong	甲基化植物油	河北明顺农业科技有限公司
农健飞 Nongjianfei	超支化聚合物	桂林集琦生化有限公司
奇功 Qigong	基于聚氧乙烯醚改性三硅氧烷	桂林集琦生化有限公司
倍倍加 Beibeijia	脂肪胺	桂林集琦生化有限公司
混合橙精油助剂 Mixed orange essential oil additive	高效植物精油	福建路易达孚公司

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂和助剂组合 Combinations of test chemicals and additives	用量 Dosage (mL/L)
1	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+农建飞	0.225+6
2	噻虫·高氯氟+农建飞	1.15+6
3	螺虫·呋虫胺+农建飞	0.45+6
4	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+倍达通	0.225+15
5	螺虫·呋虫胺+倍达通	0.45+15
6	噻虫·高氯氟+倍达通	1.15+15
7	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+奇功	0.225+0.33
8	噻虫·高氯氟+奇功	1.15+0.33
9	螺虫·呋虫胺+奇功	0.45+0.33
10	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+倍倍加	0.225+0.33
11	噻虫·高氯氟+倍倍加	1.15+0.33
12	螺虫·呋虫胺+倍倍加	0.45+0.33
13	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+ 混合橙精油助剂	0.225+1
14	噻虫·高氯氟+混合橙精油助剂	1.15+1
15	螺虫·呋虫胺+混合橙精油助剂	0.45+1
16	噻虫·高氯氟+水	1.15
17	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+水	0.225
18	螺虫·呋虫胺+水	0.45

处理 Treat- ments	供试药剂和助剂组合 Combinations of test chemicals and additives	用量 Dosage (mL/L)
1	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+农建飞	0.225+6
2	噻虫·高氯氟+农建飞	1.15+6
3	螺虫·呋虫胺+农建飞	0.45+6
4	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+倍达通	0.225+15
5	螺虫·呋虫胺+倍达通	0.45+15
6	噻虫·高氯氟+倍达通	1.15+15
7	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+奇功	0.225+0.33
8	噻虫·高氯氟+奇功	1.15+0.33
9	螺虫·呋虫胺+奇功	0.45+0.33
10	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+倍倍加	0.225+0.33
11	噻虫·高氯氟+倍倍加	1.15+0.33
12	螺虫·呋虫胺+倍倍加	0.45+0.33
13	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+ 混合橙精油助剂	0.225+1
14	噻虫·高氯氟+混合橙精油助剂	1.15+1
15	螺虫·呋虫胺+混合橙精油助剂	0.45+1
16	噻虫·高氯氟+水	1.15
17	氟啶虫酰胺·联苯菊酯+水	0.225
18	螺虫·呋虫胺+水	0.45

处理 Treatments	防效Control effect(%)
处理 Treatments	药后1 d	药后3 d	药后7 d	药后14 d
1	(19.26±1.43)^fg	(45.74±1.85)^fg	(64.43±1.44)^f	(58.17±1.18)^e
2	(30.72±0.75)^cde	(53.04±1.68)^de	(73.16±2.18)^cd	(64.12±2.76)^cd
3	(16.11±1.92)^g	(49.83±3.03)^efg	(72.30±2.05)^cde	(65.31±2.80)^bcd
4	(38.31±1.60)^b	(68.48±0.64)^b	(77.25±1.59)^bc	(70.63±0.71)^b
5	(45.61±1.94)^a	(83.38±0.88)^a	(86.98±2.22)^a	(81.97±1.46)^a
6	(34.34±1.50)^bc	(80.59±0.37)^a	(81.39±0.23)^ab	(79.64±0.63)^a
7	(24.00±2.19)^ef	(52.56±1.86)^de	(73.31±2.28)^cd	(68.94±1.57)^bcd
8	(24.76±2.40)^def	(59.01±1.50)^c	(73.29±2.75)^cd	(70.86±1.32)^b
9	(27.21±2.27)^de	(56.31±1.78)^bc	(69.82±1.73)^def	(68.61±1.55)^bcd
10	(30.17±1.22)^cde	(49.50±2.23)^efg	(67.34±2.25)^def	(65.64±1.78)^bcd
11	(30.30±2.72)^cde	(50.73±2.27)^def	(71.63±3.30)^cdef	(70.19±2.20)^b
12	(31.08±2.91)^cd	(59.66±1.57)^c	(72.39±2.19)^cde	(69.79±1.32)^bc
13	(30.82±1.67)^cde	(52.61±1.61)^de	(66.50±1.91)^def	(64.92±1.52)^bcd
14	(30.37±1.51)^cde	(44.61±2.14)^g	(65.68±2.10)^ef	(63.30±1.75)^de
15	(19.39±3.12)^fg	(55.92±1.71)^bc	(67.26±2.54)^def	(63.34±2.27)^de

无人机飞防助剂和杀虫剂组合对其雾滴沉降特性及棉蚜防效的影响

Effects of different combinations of drone flight defense agents and additives on their droplet deposition parameters and field spraying control of cotton aphids

在线阅读

PDF下载

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 21

相关文章 15

编辑推荐 0

Metrics

危害程度 Degree of harm	用药量 Dosage (L/hm²)	虫口减退率Decrease rate(%)
危害程度 Degree of harm	用药量 Dosage (L/hm²)	药后1 d	药后3 d	药后7 d	药后14 d
1级Level 1	18	(28.18±0.63)^a	(61.70±1.98)^a	(76.34±0.41)^a	(67.27±0.63)^a
2级Level 2	21	(31.33±0.56)^b	(69.65±1.22)^b	(81.92±0.24)^b	(71.55±0.40)^b
3级Level 3	25.5	(33.91±0.58)^c	(76.86±0.74)^c	(88.03±0.53)^c	(80.27±0.73)^c
4级Level 4	30	(39.44±0.27)^d	(80.71±0.45)^d	(91.14±0.13)^d	(84.03±0.24)^d

[1]	高国文, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 孙健博, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 李克梅, 丁新华, 郭文超. 基于不同种衣剂的玉米茎腐病优势致病菌拟轮枝镰孢菌室内毒力测定与防效评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 373-378.
[2]	张旭艳, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 付开赟, 丁新华, 李亚文, 郭文超, 牙森·沙力. 4种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾的室内毒力测定及田间防效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2025, 62(2): 386-392.
[3]	张帅, 高国文, 吴莉莉, 赵海燕, 王小武, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 丁新华, 李克梅, 郭文超. 增效剂及微肥与种衣剂协同施用评价玉米茎腐病的防效[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 19-27.
[4]	袁梓涵, 赵雯慧, 王小武, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 丁新华, 张帅, 付开赟, 贾尊尊, 郭文超. 玉米茎腐病生防菌的筛选及生防效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(S1): 35-48.
[5]	沈煜洋, 洪高洁, 范贵强, 陈利, 雷钧杰, 李广阔, 高海峰. 杀虫剂减施和添加助剂对红枣-小麦间作麦田蚜虫防效的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2257-2268.
[6]	安哲, 牛瑞昌, 朱香镇, 王丽, 张开心, 李东阳, 姬继超, 牛林, 高雪珂, 雒珺瑜, 崔金杰, 马德英. 棉田不同菌型棉蚜体内微生物多样性分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(9): 2277-2284.
[7]	吐尔逊·阿合买提, 刘旭坤, 赵雯慧, 朱晓峰, 阿尔孜姑丽·肉孜, 帕丽达姆·塔依尔, 付开赟, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 阿地力·沙塔尔, 郭文超. 10种杀虫剂对桃小食心虫防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(6): 1447-1453.
[8]	王文窈, 施万斌, 芦屹, 图尔荪托合提·阿卜杜拉, 叶尔胜·哈尔肯, 马荣. 两种助剂在核桃腐烂病化学防控中的减药增效分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(3): 672-680.
[9]	王伟, 张仁福, 刘海洋, 丁瑞丰, 梁革梅, 姚举. 不同抗性遗传背景棉蚜氟啶虫胺腈及啶虫脒抗性品系转录组分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2024, 61(12): 3078-3088.
[10]	薛正轩, 蔡志平, 张智健, 彭天祥, 黄志伟, 黄恩泽, 王佩玲, 陆宴辉. 基于铷元素标记技术分析多异瓢虫在甘草带与棉田间的迁移范围[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(7): 1741-1747.
[11]	李耀发, 安静杰, 窦亚楠, 孙小诺, 张谦, 柳春红, 党志红, 高占林. 播期对黄河流域棉花苗蚜种群动态和棉花产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(10): 2496-2500.
[12]	王小丽, 韩睿, 张全成, 赵鹏程, 王俊刚. 不同地理种群棉蚜三种关键性酶活差异及其与抗性相关性[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(8): 2007-2013.
[13]	付开赟, 李爱梅, 丁新华, 贾尊尊, 吐尔逊·阿合买提, 冯宏祖, 郭文超. 10 种杀虫剂对番茄潜叶蛾防治效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1165-1172.
[14]	李艳兵, 郭小虎, 努尔什瓦克·阿达力别克, 帕提玛·乌木尔汗, 马德英. 人工助迁多异瓢虫和化防2种模式对棉蚜的防效及天敌种群动态影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(5): 1173-1179.
[15]	张栋海, 魏俊梅, 陈兵, 吉光鹏, 王凡, 牛蛉磊. 无人机播前喷施除草剂防除棉田杂草效果评价[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(12): 3022-3029.