Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (9): 2152-2162.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.009
• Crop Genetics and Breeding·Germplasm Resources·Molecular Genetics·Soil Fertilizer • Previous Articles Next Articles
WANG Lihong(), ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang(), LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru()
Received:
2022-11-23
Online:
2023-09-20
Published:
2023-09-19
Correspondence author:
FAN Zheru (1964-), male, Gansu native, researcher, mainly engaged in wheat genetics and breeding, (E-mail) Supported by:
王立红(), 张宏芝, 张跃强(), 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒()
通讯作者:
樊哲儒(1964-),男,甘肃人,研究员,研究方向小麦遗传育种,(E-mail)作者简介:
王立红(1990-),女,河南人,助理研究员,研究方向为作物高产栽培,(E-mail)1498877605@qq.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, ZHANG Yueqiang, LI Jianfeng, WANG Zhong, GAO Xin, SHI Jia, WANG Chunsheng, XIA Jianqiang, FAN Zheru. Analysis of dry matter production, transport and nitrogen fertilizer utilization caused by yield Gap at different yield levels of winter wheat[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
王立红, 张宏芝, 张跃强, 李剑峰, 王重, 高新, 时佳, 王春生, 夏建强, 樊哲儒. 不同产量水平冬小麦产量差异形成的干物质生产、转运及氮肥利用分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(9): 2152-2162.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.09.009
年份 Year | 处理 Treat- ments | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (g/kg) | 全钾 Total potassium (g/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen (mg/kg) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018~2019 | SH | 14.044 | 0.839 | 0.924 | 21.648 | 50.858 | 16.371 | 153 |
HH | 12.273 | 0.827 | 0.926 | 21.725 | 44.018 | 14.819 | 132 | |
FP | 11.352 | 0.807 | 1.004 | 22.078 | 43.311 | 14.262 | 136 | |
CK | 10.499 | 0.738 | 0.906 | 22.672 | 35.250 | 7.208 | 125 | |
2019~2020 | SH | 16.239 | 0.910 | 0.447 | 27.099 | 74.550 | 20.477 | 219 |
HH | 15.416 | 0.860 | 0.798 | 28.366 | 64.113 | 17.993 | 221 | |
FP | 14.279 | 0.800 | 0.777 | 28.670 | 61.131 | 15.156 | 212 | |
CK | 13.785 | 0.810 | 0.712 | 26.289 | 62.113 | 14.522 | 205 |
Tab.1 Soil basic fertility before sowing
年份 Year | 处理 Treat- ments | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 全磷 Total phosphorus (g/kg) | 全钾 Total potassium (g/kg) | 碱解氮 Alkaline nitrogen (mg/kg) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018~2019 | SH | 14.044 | 0.839 | 0.924 | 21.648 | 50.858 | 16.371 | 153 |
HH | 12.273 | 0.827 | 0.926 | 21.725 | 44.018 | 14.819 | 132 | |
FP | 11.352 | 0.807 | 1.004 | 22.078 | 43.311 | 14.262 | 136 | |
CK | 10.499 | 0.738 | 0.906 | 22.672 | 35.250 | 7.208 | 125 | |
2019~2020 | SH | 16.239 | 0.910 | 0.447 | 27.099 | 74.550 | 20.477 | 219 |
HH | 15.416 | 0.860 | 0.798 | 28.366 | 64.113 | 17.993 | 221 | |
FP | 14.279 | 0.800 | 0.777 | 28.670 | 61.131 | 15.156 | 212 | |
CK | 13.785 | 0.810 | 0.712 | 26.289 | 62.113 | 14.522 | 205 |
处理 Treat- ments | 基肥 Base fertilizer | 返青期 Reviving stage | 起身期 Pre- jointing stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 孕穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Filling stage | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
春3叶 Spring 3 leaves | 春4叶 Spring 4 leaves | 第一节 1.5~2 The first section 1.5-2 (cm) | 拔节后 10~12 (d) 10-12 d after jointing | 旗叶展开 Flag leaf expansion | 中部小 穗开花 Central spikelet blossom | 开花后 10~12 d 10-12d after flowering | 间隔 8~10 d Interval 8-10 d | 间隔 8~10 d Interval 8-10 d | ||||||||
有机肥+ 磷酸二铵 (kg/hm2) Organic fertilizer+ Diamine | 尿素+硫酸钾 (kg/hm2) Urea+Potassium sulfate | 尿素+磷酸二氢钾 (kg/hm2) Urea+Potassium dihydrogen phosphate | ||||||||||||||
SH | 7 500+375 | 90+0 | 90+0 | 150+30 | 90+30 | 90+0 | 90+0 | 75+30 | 0+15 | 0+15 | ||||||
HH | 3 000+300 | 75+0 | 75+0 | 90+30 | 75+15 | 75+0 | 75+0 | 60+30 | 0+15 | 0+0 | ||||||
FP | 1 500+225 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 75+30 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+30 | 0+15 | 0+0 | ||||||
CK | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 |
Tab.2 Fertilization application in the field experiments
处理 Treat- ments | 基肥 Base fertilizer | 返青期 Reviving stage | 起身期 Pre- jointing stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 孕穗期 Heading stage | 开花期 Flowering stage | 灌浆期 Filling stage | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
春3叶 Spring 3 leaves | 春4叶 Spring 4 leaves | 第一节 1.5~2 The first section 1.5-2 (cm) | 拔节后 10~12 (d) 10-12 d after jointing | 旗叶展开 Flag leaf expansion | 中部小 穗开花 Central spikelet blossom | 开花后 10~12 d 10-12d after flowering | 间隔 8~10 d Interval 8-10 d | 间隔 8~10 d Interval 8-10 d | ||||||||
有机肥+ 磷酸二铵 (kg/hm2) Organic fertilizer+ Diamine | 尿素+硫酸钾 (kg/hm2) Urea+Potassium sulfate | 尿素+磷酸二氢钾 (kg/hm2) Urea+Potassium dihydrogen phosphate | ||||||||||||||
SH | 7 500+375 | 90+0 | 90+0 | 150+30 | 90+30 | 90+0 | 90+0 | 75+30 | 0+15 | 0+15 | ||||||
HH | 3 000+300 | 75+0 | 75+0 | 90+30 | 75+15 | 75+0 | 75+0 | 60+30 | 0+15 | 0+0 | ||||||
FP | 1 500+225 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 75+30 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+0 | 45+30 | 0+15 | 0+0 | ||||||
CK | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 | 0+0 |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatments | 收获穗数 Spike number (104spikes/hm2) | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 籽粒产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 与CK产量差 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018~2019 | SH | 535.67a | 42.18a | 52.39a | 9 342.80a | 6 623.40 |
HH | 502.00ab | 38.55b | 52.44a | 8 137.20b | 5 417.80 | |
FP | 494.33ab | 33.45c | 48.09b | 6 860.20c | 4 140.80 | |
CK | 474.00b | 19.07d | 44.48c | 2 719.40d | - | |
2019~2020 | SH | 585.60a | 44.55a | 50.30b | 9 854.50a | 7 103.14 |
HH | 532.60ab | 38.88b | 53.76a | 8 372.08b | 5 575.72 | |
FP | 515.00b | 32.01c | 49.21b | 6 082.02c | 3 330.66 | |
CK | 475.80b | 18.82d | 40.97c | 2 751.36d | - | |
P-value | ||||||
年份(Y) Year | 0.022 5 | 0.905 2 | 0.066 1 | 0.999 7 | ||
处理(T) Treatments | 0.000 1 | 0.000 1 | 0.000 1 | 0.000 1 | ||
年份×处理(Y×T) Year×Treatments | 0.549 5 | 0.215 5 | 0.000 4 | 0.246 0 |
Tab.3 Xinjiang winter wheat yield and yield components under different yield levels
年份 Year | 处理 Treatments | 收获穗数 Spike number (104spikes/hm2) | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 籽粒产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 与CK产量差 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018~2019 | SH | 535.67a | 42.18a | 52.39a | 9 342.80a | 6 623.40 |
HH | 502.00ab | 38.55b | 52.44a | 8 137.20b | 5 417.80 | |
FP | 494.33ab | 33.45c | 48.09b | 6 860.20c | 4 140.80 | |
CK | 474.00b | 19.07d | 44.48c | 2 719.40d | - | |
2019~2020 | SH | 585.60a | 44.55a | 50.30b | 9 854.50a | 7 103.14 |
HH | 532.60ab | 38.88b | 53.76a | 8 372.08b | 5 575.72 | |
FP | 515.00b | 32.01c | 49.21b | 6 082.02c | 3 330.66 | |
CK | 475.80b | 18.82d | 40.97c | 2 751.36d | - | |
P-value | ||||||
年份(Y) Year | 0.022 5 | 0.905 2 | 0.066 1 | 0.999 7 | ||
处理(T) Treatments | 0.000 1 | 0.000 1 | 0.000 1 | 0.000 1 | ||
年份×处理(Y×T) Year×Treatments | 0.549 5 | 0.215 5 | 0.000 4 | 0.246 0 |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatments | 开花期Flowering stage | 成熟期Mature stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆+叶鞘 Stem+sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 颖壳+穗轴 Spike+glumes | 茎秆+叶鞘 Stem+sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 籽粒 Grain | 颖壳+穗轴 Spike+glumes | |||
2018~2019 | SH | 8 229.49a | 4 056.30a | 3 479.29a | 7 417.06a | 1 636.29a | 9 342.80a | 2 735.71a | |
HH | 7 235.67b | 3 628.00b | 2 589.53b | 6 306.76b | 1 191.83b | 8 137.20b | 2 293.38b | ||
FP | 6 768.56b | 3 458.43b | 1 359.31c | 5 011.23c | 852.60c | 6 860.20c | 2 148.20c | ||
CK | 2 634.18c | 1 412.86c | 984.31d | 2 196.19d | 392.10d | 2 719.40d | 923.95d | ||
2019~2020 | SH | 9 521.45a | 3 684.97a | 3 090.17a | 8 200.06a | 1 437.96a | 9 854.50a | 3 330.89a | |
HH | 7 556.44b | 2 624.14b | 2 424.70b | 5 782.20b | 1 056.32a | 8 372.08b | 2 599.80b | ||
FP | 5 645.06c | 2 057.03c | 1 385.61c | 3 432.12c | 751.04b | 6 082.02c | 2 057.25c | ||
CK | 2 949.10d | 946.73d | 691.20d | 1 700.50d | 415.63c | 2 751.36d | 803.94d |
Tab.4 Differences in dry matter distribution of winter wheat at different yield levels(kg/hm2)
年份 Year | 处理 Treatments | 开花期Flowering stage | 成熟期Mature stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎秆+叶鞘 Stem+sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 颖壳+穗轴 Spike+glumes | 茎秆+叶鞘 Stem+sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 籽粒 Grain | 颖壳+穗轴 Spike+glumes | |||
2018~2019 | SH | 8 229.49a | 4 056.30a | 3 479.29a | 7 417.06a | 1 636.29a | 9 342.80a | 2 735.71a | |
HH | 7 235.67b | 3 628.00b | 2 589.53b | 6 306.76b | 1 191.83b | 8 137.20b | 2 293.38b | ||
FP | 6 768.56b | 3 458.43b | 1 359.31c | 5 011.23c | 852.60c | 6 860.20c | 2 148.20c | ||
CK | 2 634.18c | 1 412.86c | 984.31d | 2 196.19d | 392.10d | 2 719.40d | 923.95d | ||
2019~2020 | SH | 9 521.45a | 3 684.97a | 3 090.17a | 8 200.06a | 1 437.96a | 9 854.50a | 3 330.89a | |
HH | 7 556.44b | 2 624.14b | 2 424.70b | 5 782.20b | 1 056.32a | 8 372.08b | 2 599.80b | ||
FP | 5 645.06c | 2 057.03c | 1 385.61c | 3 432.12c | 751.04b | 6 082.02c | 2 057.25c | ||
CK | 2 949.10d | 946.73d | 691.20d | 1 700.50d | 415.63c | 2 751.36d | 803.94d |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 花前干物质 Dry matter assimilation before anthesis | 花后干物质 Dry matter assimilation after anthesis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
转运量 Translocation amount (kg/hm2) | 转运率 Translocation ratio(%) | 贡献率 Contribution ratio to grain (%) | 积累量 Assimilation amount (kg/hm2) | 贡献率 CG/(%) | ||
2018~2019 | SH | 3 976.02a | 25.22b | 42.56b | 5 366.78a | 57.44a |
HH | 3 661.23ab | 27.21ab | 44.99b | 4 475.97b | 55.01ab | |
FP | 3574.27ab | 30.85a | 52.10a | 3 285.93c | 47.90b | |
CK | 1 519.11b | 30.19a | 55.86a | 1 200.29d | 44.14c | |
2019~2020 | SH | 3 327.68a | 20.42d | 33.77c | 6 526.82a | 66.23a |
HH | 3 166.96ab | 25.12c | 37.83c | 5 205.12b | 62.17ab | |
FP | 2 847.29b | 31.33b | 46.81b | 3 234.73c | 53.19b | |
CK | 1 666.96c | 36.34a | 60.59a | 1 084.40d | 39.41c |
Tab.5 Differences of dry matter transport in vegetative organs and contributions to grain yield of winter wheat at different yield levels
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 花前干物质 Dry matter assimilation before anthesis | 花后干物质 Dry matter assimilation after anthesis | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
转运量 Translocation amount (kg/hm2) | 转运率 Translocation ratio(%) | 贡献率 Contribution ratio to grain (%) | 积累量 Assimilation amount (kg/hm2) | 贡献率 CG/(%) | ||
2018~2019 | SH | 3 976.02a | 25.22b | 42.56b | 5 366.78a | 57.44a |
HH | 3 661.23ab | 27.21ab | 44.99b | 4 475.97b | 55.01ab | |
FP | 3574.27ab | 30.85a | 52.10a | 3 285.93c | 47.90b | |
CK | 1 519.11b | 30.19a | 55.86a | 1 200.29d | 44.14c | |
2019~2020 | SH | 3 327.68a | 20.42d | 33.77c | 6 526.82a | 66.23a |
HH | 3 166.96ab | 25.12c | 37.83c | 5 205.12b | 62.17ab | |
FP | 2 847.29b | 31.33b | 46.81b | 3 234.73c | 53.19b | |
CK | 1 666.96c | 36.34a | 60.59a | 1 084.40d | 39.41c |
年份 Year | 处理 Treat- ment | 营养器官氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation amount of vegetative organs(kg/hm2) | 花前氮素 Nitrogen before anthesis | 花后氮素 Nitrogen after anthesis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
开花期 Anthesis stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 转运量 Translocation amount (kg/hm2) | 转运效率 Translocation rate(%) | 贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg/hm2) | 贡献率 Contribution rate/(%) | ||
2018~ 2019 | SH | 252.76a | 60.93a | 191.83a | 75.89a | 78.80b | 51.62a | 21.20b |
HH | 173.06b | 43.06b | 130.00b | 75.12a | 77.72a | 37.27b | 22.28b | |
FP | 109.92c | 31.47c | 78.45c | 71.37a | 73.94a | 27.65c | 26.06b | |
CK | 36.74d | 11.81d | 24.93d | 67.86b | 64.25c | 13.87d | 35.75a | |
2019~ 2020 | SH | 233.84a | 68.51a | 165.33a | 70.70a | 75.53b | 53.58a | 24.47b |
HH | 149.39b | 40.68b | 108.72b | 72.77a | 71.59a | 43.15b | 28.41b | |
FP | 91.82c | 23.55c | 68.26c | 74.35a | 66.94a | 33.71c | 33.06a | |
CK | 30.77d | 8.99d | 21.78d | 70.78a | 62.88b | 12.85d | 37.12a |
Tab.6 Nitrogen transport to grain and its contribution rate to grain in wheat
年份 Year | 处理 Treat- ment | 营养器官氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation amount of vegetative organs(kg/hm2) | 花前氮素 Nitrogen before anthesis | 花后氮素 Nitrogen after anthesis | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
开花期 Anthesis stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 转运量 Translocation amount (kg/hm2) | 转运效率 Translocation rate(%) | 贡献率 Contribution rate(%) | 积累量 Accumulation amount (kg/hm2) | 贡献率 Contribution rate/(%) | ||
2018~ 2019 | SH | 252.76a | 60.93a | 191.83a | 75.89a | 78.80b | 51.62a | 21.20b |
HH | 173.06b | 43.06b | 130.00b | 75.12a | 77.72a | 37.27b | 22.28b | |
FP | 109.92c | 31.47c | 78.45c | 71.37a | 73.94a | 27.65c | 26.06b | |
CK | 36.74d | 11.81d | 24.93d | 67.86b | 64.25c | 13.87d | 35.75a | |
2019~ 2020 | SH | 233.84a | 68.51a | 165.33a | 70.70a | 75.53b | 53.58a | 24.47b |
HH | 149.39b | 40.68b | 108.72b | 72.77a | 71.59a | 43.15b | 28.41b | |
FP | 91.82c | 23.55c | 68.26c | 74.35a | 66.94a | 33.71c | 33.06a | |
CK | 30.77d | 8.99d | 21.78d | 70.78a | 62.88b | 12.85d | 37.12a |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 需氮量 Nitrogen requirement (kg/mg) | 氮素吸收效率 Nitrogen uptake efficiency (kg/kg) | 氮素利用效率 Nitrogen use efficiency (kg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力 Nitrogen partial factor productivity (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018~2019 | SH | 32.579a | 0.640a | 30.695c | 19.648c |
HH | 25.849b | 0.629a | 38.687c | 24.326b | |
FP | 20.053c | 0.629a | 49.867b | 31.368a | |
CK | 16.610d | / | 53.735a | / | |
2019~2020 | SH | 29.166a | 0.605a | 34.287c | 20.725c |
HH | 22.999b | 0.578b | 43.481b | 25.029b | |
FP | 20.639b | 0.574b | 48.451b | 27.810a | |
CK | 15.855c | / | 63.072a | / |
Tab.7 Difference of nitrogen use efficiency
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 需氮量 Nitrogen requirement (kg/mg) | 氮素吸收效率 Nitrogen uptake efficiency (kg/kg) | 氮素利用效率 Nitrogen use efficiency (kg/kg) | 氮肥偏生产力 Nitrogen partial factor productivity (kg/kg) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018~2019 | SH | 32.579a | 0.640a | 30.695c | 19.648c |
HH | 25.849b | 0.629a | 38.687c | 24.326b | |
FP | 20.053c | 0.629a | 49.867b | 31.368a | |
CK | 16.610d | / | 53.735a | / | |
2019~2020 | SH | 29.166a | 0.605a | 34.287c | 20.725c |
HH | 22.999b | 0.578b | 43.481b | 25.029b | |
FP | 20.639b | 0.574b | 48.451b | 27.810a | |
CK | 15.855c | / | 63.072a | / |
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 籽粒产量 Grain yield | 收获穗数 Spike number | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 花前干物质 量转运量 Pre flowering dry matter mass transport capacity | 花后干物质 量积累量 Accumulation of dry matter quality after flowering | 花前氮素 转运量 Nitrogen transport capacity before flowering | 花后氮素 积累量 Nitrogen accumulation after flowering | 需氮量 Nitrogen requirement | 氮素吸收效率 Nitrogen uptake efficiency | 氮素利用效率 Nitrogen utilization efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
收获穗数 Spike number | 0.84** | ||||||||||
穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 1.00** | 0.85** | |||||||||
千粒重 1000-grain weight | 0.89** | 0.64 | 0.90** | ||||||||
花前干物质量转运量 Pre flowering dry matter mass transport capacity | 0.92** | 0.59 | 0.91** | 0.85** | |||||||
花后干物质量积累量 Accumulation of dry matter quality after flowering | 0.98** | 0.91** | 0.98** | 0.86** | 0.82** | ||||||
花前氮素转运量 Nitrogen transport capacity before flowering | 0.92** | 0.84** | 0.91** | 0.76* | 0.80** | 0.93** | |||||
花后氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation after flowering | -0.03 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.15 | -0.12 | -0.32 | ||||
需氮量 Nitrogen requirement | 0.93** | 0.78* | 0.93** | 0.81** | 0.86** | 0.91** | 0.97** | -0.10 | |||
氮素吸收效率 Nitrogen uptake efficiency | 0.89** | 0.62 | 0.90** | 0.86** | 0.95** | 0.81** | 0.68* | 0.33 | 0.76* | ||
氮素利用效率 Nitrogen utilization efficiency | -0.97** | -0.78* | -0.97** | -0.89** | -0.92** | -0.94** | -0.93** | -0.04 | -0.98** | -0.87** | |
氮肥偏生产力 Nitrogen partial factor productivity | 0.74* | 0.46 | 0.75* | 0.76* | 0.84** | 0.65 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.96** | -0.69* |
Tab.8 Correlation analysis
相关系数 Correlation coefficient | 籽粒产量 Grain yield | 收获穗数 Spike number | 穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 花前干物质 量转运量 Pre flowering dry matter mass transport capacity | 花后干物质 量积累量 Accumulation of dry matter quality after flowering | 花前氮素 转运量 Nitrogen transport capacity before flowering | 花后氮素 积累量 Nitrogen accumulation after flowering | 需氮量 Nitrogen requirement | 氮素吸收效率 Nitrogen uptake efficiency | 氮素利用效率 Nitrogen utilization efficiency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
收获穗数 Spike number | 0.84** | ||||||||||
穗粒数 Grain number per spike | 1.00** | 0.85** | |||||||||
千粒重 1000-grain weight | 0.89** | 0.64 | 0.90** | ||||||||
花前干物质量转运量 Pre flowering dry matter mass transport capacity | 0.92** | 0.59 | 0.91** | 0.85** | |||||||
花后干物质量积累量 Accumulation of dry matter quality after flowering | 0.98** | 0.91** | 0.98** | 0.86** | 0.82** | ||||||
花前氮素转运量 Nitrogen transport capacity before flowering | 0.92** | 0.84** | 0.91** | 0.76* | 0.80** | 0.93** | |||||
花后氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation after flowering | -0.03 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 0.19 | 0.15 | -0.12 | -0.32 | ||||
需氮量 Nitrogen requirement | 0.93** | 0.78* | 0.93** | 0.81** | 0.86** | 0.91** | 0.97** | -0.10 | |||
氮素吸收效率 Nitrogen uptake efficiency | 0.89** | 0.62 | 0.90** | 0.86** | 0.95** | 0.81** | 0.68* | 0.33 | 0.76* | ||
氮素利用效率 Nitrogen utilization efficiency | -0.97** | -0.78* | -0.97** | -0.89** | -0.92** | -0.94** | -0.93** | -0.04 | -0.98** | -0.87** | |
氮肥偏生产力 Nitrogen partial factor productivity | 0.74* | 0.46 | 0.75* | 0.76* | 0.84** | 0.65 | 0.46 | 0.46 | 0.54 | 0.96** | -0.69* |
[1] | 石雄高, 裴雪霞, 党建友, 等. 小麦微喷(滴)灌水肥一体化高产优质高效生态栽培研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2022,(1):1-10. |
SHI Xionggao, PEI Xuexia, DANG Jianyou, et al. Research progress on high-yield, high-quality, high-efficiency and ecology cultivation of wheat micro-sprinkling and drip fertigation[J]. Crops, 2022, (1): 1-10. | |
[2] | 吴芬, 徐萍, 郭海谦, 等. 冬小麦产量差和资源利用效率差及调控途径研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2020, 28(10):1551-1567. |
WU Fen, XU Ping, GUO Haiqian, et al. Advances in research regarding the yield gap and resource use efficiency of winter wheat cultivation and the related regulatory approaches[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecological Agriculture, 2020, 28 (10): 1551-1567. | |
[3] | Kedruk A C, Kiriziy D A, Sokolovska-Sergienko O G, et al. Response of the photosynthetic apparatus of winter wheat varieties to the combined action of drought and high temperature[J]. Fiziol.rast.genet, 2021, 53: 387-405. |
[4] |
Meier E A, Hunt J R, Hochman Z. Evaluation of nitrogen bank, a soil nitrogen management strategy for sustainably closing wheat yield gaps[J]. Field Crops Research, 2021, 261: 108017.
DOI URL |
[5] |
方辉, 范贵强, 高永红, 等. 施氮对不同小麦品种光合荧光特性及产量的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2022, 59(1):55-62.
DOI |
FANG Hui, FAN Guiqiang, GAO Yonghong, et al. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Photosynthetic fluorescence and yield of different wheat varieties[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 59 (1): 55-62.
DOI |
|
[6] | 范婷, 赵凯敏, 周仪佳, 等. 稻茬小麦不同栽培模式产量差异形成的群体结构分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(5):594-603. |
FAN Ting, ZHAO Kaimin, ZHOU Yijia, et al. Analysis of population structure for yield gap of wheat after rice under different cultivation modes[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41 (5): 594-603. | |
[7] | 段剑钊. 黄淮南部冬小麦缩差增效技术途径及生理机制研究[D]. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2018. |
DUAN Jianzhao. Studies on physiological mechanism and technical approach of reducing yield gap and increasing efficiency in the south of Huang-Huai wheat-producing area[D]. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2018. | |
[8] | 马小龙, 王朝辉, 曹寒冰, 等. 黄土高原旱地小麦产量差异与产量构成及氮磷钾吸收利用的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(5): 1135-1145. |
MA Xiaolong, WANG Zhaohui, CAO Hanbing, et al. Yield variation of winter wheat and its relation to yield components, NPK uptake and utilization in drylands of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23 (5): 1135-1145. | |
[9] | 魏海燕, 凌启鸿, 张洪程, 等. 作物群体质量及其关键调控技术[J]. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 39(2):1-9. |
WEI Haiyan, LING Qihong, ZHANG Hongcheng, et al. The quality of crop population and its key regulation technology[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University (Agriculture and Life Sciences Ed.), 2018, 39 (2): 1-9. | |
[10] |
王妍, 徐俊, 游蕊, 等. 稻茬小麦不同光效型群体的光合物质生产积累及转运差异分析[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(17):7-15.
DOI |
WANG Yan, XU Jun, YOU Rui, et al. Photosynthetic Material Production, Accumulation and Transport Characteristics of Different Photosynthetic Efficiency Wheat Population in Rice-Wheat Rotation[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36 (17): 7-15.
DOI |
|
[11] | 吕广德, 亓晓蕾, 张继波, 等. 中、高产型小麦干物质和氮素累积转运对水氮的响应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9):1534-1547. |
LYU Guangde, QI Xiaolei, ZHANG Jibo, et al. Response of nitrogen and dry matter accumulation in middle and highyield wheat cultivars to water and nitrogen supply[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27 (9): 1534-1547. | |
[12] | 樊玉参, 石玉, 于振文, 等. 不同产量潜力小麦品种氮素积累与转运的差异[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2021,(12):1-7. |
FAN Yucan, SHI Yu, YU Zhenwen, et al. Difference of nitrogen accumulation and translocation of wheat varieties with different yield potential[J]. Journal of Wheat Crops, 2021, (12): 1-7. | |
[13] | 张晶晶. 不同产量水平麦田下氮素利用及其产量形成的差异[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021. |
ZHANG Jingjing. Differences of Nitrogen Utilization and Yield Formation in Wheat Fields with Different Yield Levels[D]. Tai’an: Shandong Agricultural University, 2021. | |
[14] | 王立红, 张宏芝, 王重, 等. 新疆冬小麦不同产量水平群体特性分析[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(5):594-600. |
WANG Lihong, ZHANG Hongzhi, WANG Zhong, et al. Population characteristics of different yield levels of winter wheat in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2020, 40 (5): 594-600. | |
[15] |
何刚, 王朝辉, 李富翠, 等. 地表覆盖对旱地小麦氮磷钾需求及生理效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(9): 1657-1671.
DOI |
HE Gang, WANG Zhaohui, LI Fucui, et al. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium requirement and their physiological efficiency for winter wheat affected by soil surface managements in dryland[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49 (9): 1657-1671.
DOI |
|
[16] | 赵全志, 黄丕生, 凌启鸿. 水稻群体光合速率和茎鞘贮藏物质与产量关系的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34(3):304-310. |
ZHAO Quanzhi, HUANG Pisheng, LING Qihong. Relations between canopy apparent photosynthesis and store matter in stem and sheath between and yield nitrogen regulations in rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2001, 34 (3): 304-310. | |
[17] | 杨磊, 孙敏, 林文, 等. 群体结构对旱地小麦土壤耗水与物质生产形成的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(5):1356-1365 |
YANG Lei, SUN Min, LIN Wen, et al. Effects of population structure on soil water consumption and dry matter production of dryland wheat[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40 (5): 1356-1365. | |
[18] | 牛俊义. 地膜春小麦根系生长、物质分配及叶片衰老研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2002. |
NIU Junyi. Research on root growth, material distribution and leaf senescence of spring wheat with plastic film[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2002. | |
[19] | 郑成岩, 于振文, 马兴华, 等. 高产小麦耗水特性及干物质的积累与分配[J]. 作物学报, 2008,(8):1450-1458. |
ZHENG Chengyan, YU Zhenwen, Ma Xinghua, et al. Water consumption characteristics and dry matter accumulation and distribution of high-yielding wheat[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,(8): 1450-1458. | |
[20] | 王玉杰, 王永华, 韩磊, 等. 不同栽培管理模式对冬小麦花后干物质积累与分配特征及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(5):894-900. |
WANG Yujie, WANG Yonghua, HAN Lei, et al. Effect of different cultivation and management mode on the characteristics of accumulation and distribution of dry matter and the yield of winter wheat after anthesis[J]. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2011, 31 (5): 894-900. | |
[21] | 盖盼盼, 马尚宇, 耿兵婕, 等. 渍水和增温对小麦根系形态、生理和地上部物质积累的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报:1-14[2022-03-16]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1148.S.20220207.1051.002.html. |
GAI Panpan, MA Shangyu, GENG Bingjie, et al. Effects of waterlogging and increasing temperature on the morphology, physiology and above-ground matter accumulation of wheat roots[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 1-14 [2022-03-16] http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/32.1148.S.20220207.1051.002.html. | |
[22] | 丁彤彤, 李朴芳, 曹丽, 等. 干旱胁迫下不同基因型小麦干物质转运对产量形成的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2021, 39(6):62-72. |
DING Tongong, LI Pufang, CAO Li, et al. Effects of dry matter translocation on yield formation of wheat with different genotypes under drought stress[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2021, 39 (6): 62-72. | |
[23] |
杨舒蓉, 付路平, 费帅鹏, 等. 北部冬麦区主栽品种光合产物贮运特性研究[J]. 核农学报, 2021, 35(8):1740-1750.
DOI |
YANG Shurong, FU Luping, FEI Shuaipeng, et al. Accumulation and partitioning characteristics of photosynthetic product of 7 Main Cultivars in Northern Winter Wheat Zone[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture Sciences, 2021, 35 (8): 1740-1750. | |
[24] | 张丽霞, 杨永辉, 尹钧, 等. 水肥一体化对小麦干物质和氮素积累转运及产量的影响[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(2):275-282. |
ZHANG Lixia, YANG Yonghui, YIN Jun, et al. Effects of Drip Fertigation on Accumulation and Translocation of Dry Matter and Nitrogen together with Yield in Wheat[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52 (2): 275-282. | |
[25] | 于振文. 小麦产量与品质生理及栽培技术[M], 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. |
YU Zhenwen. Wheat yield and quality physiology and cultivation techniques[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006. |
[1] | LIU Haijun, ZHANG Hao, WANG Yifan, CHEN Maoguang, WU Fengquan, LIN Tao, TANG Qiuxiang. Effects of different mulching materials and irrigation on yield formation and effective accumulated temperature production efficiency of machine-picked cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2091-2100. |
[2] | CHEN Chuanxin, ZHNAG Yongqiang, NIE Shihui, KONG Depeng, Sailihan Sai, XU Qijiang, LEI Junjie. Effects of biomass charcoal application rate on the growth, development, and yield of winter wheat under drip irrigation [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2146-2151. |
[3] | WANG Xiaoyu, WANG Xiaoping, SHI Wenyu, LIU Meiyan, MA Jian, GUO Yunpeng, SONG Ruixin, WANG Qingtao. Responses of photosynthetic characteristics, dry matter accumulation and yield to drought stress in winter wheat at jointing stage [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2163-2172. |
[4] | YANG Hongmei, ZHANG Yueqiang, SHI Yingwu, Omarjan Kurban, LIN Qing, WANG Ning, CHU Min, ZENG Jun. Effects of different types of foliar fertilizers on grain yield and 1uality of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2182-2188. |
[5] | DONG Yanxue, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, LI Dandan, WANG Kai, LUO Siwei, WANG Runqi, SHI Shubing. Effects of different ecological conditions on dry matter accumulation and yield of spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1848-1857. |
[6] | FENG Mei, LIU Chaoqin, CHEN Jie, LIU Wenlong, YANG Zhigang, TIAN Jieying, HUANG Xin. Analysis of character variation and heterosis of F1 generation of different crosses in wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1858-1865. |
[7] | LI Huaisheng, AI Hongyu, MENG Ling, WANG Heya, ZHANG Lei, AI Haifeng. Effects of chasing rate during peak nutrient uptake of transport under n Reduction on spring wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1866-1872. |
[8] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, NIE Shihui, XU Qijiang, Sailihan Sai, LEI Junjie. Regulation of chlormequat on lodging resistance of winter wheat stem during the period of drip application of CCC [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1873-1878. |
[9] | YANG Jinyu, WANG Xihe, SUN Jiusheng. Effect of hydroponic culture on amino acid composition of whole plant barley and wheat seedlings and comparative analysis [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(7): 1589-1595. |
[10] | TIAN Wenqiang, DONG Yanxue, SHI Yongqing, LEI Junjie, SUN Ganggang, WANG Hongyi, NIE Lingfan, GOU Fei, AI Hongyu, SHI Shubing, ZHANG Jinshan. Effects of sowing date on stem traits and population dynamics of ultra late winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1301-1307. |
[11] | DONG Deyu, CHENG Yukun, WANG Rui, LEI Junjie, WANG Wei, CHEN Chuanxin, ZHENG Yongqiang, GENG Hongwei. Retrieval of wheat photosynthetic parameters at different growth stages based on UAV multispectral images [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1308-1318. |
[12] | ZHANG Yongqiang, CHEN Chuanxin, XU Qijiang, NIE Shihui, LEI Junjie, LIU Changwen. Effects of combined application of nitrogen enhancer and nitrogen reduction on leaf physiology and yield of winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1319-1325. |
[13] | LAI Ning, GENG Qinglong, LI Yongfu, LI Na, XIN Huinan, BU Shengbing, CHEN Shuhuang. Effects of organic manure application combined with chemical fertilizer on yield, nitrogen, phosphorus uptake and utilization, and soil fertility of the extremely-late winter sown wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1335-1343. |
[14] | LUO Siwei, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, WANG Kai, LI Dandan, WANG Runqi, DONG Yanxue, SHI Shubing. Effects of drip irrigation capillary spacing and emitter spacing on the spatial distribution of soil water, root morphology and yield of uniformly sown winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1344-1352. |
[15] | WANG Xingzhou, SHI Xiaolei, ZHANG Heng, QU Kejia, GENG Hongwei, DING Sunlei, ZHANG Jinbo, YAN Yongliang. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance at germination stage of introduced spring wheat varieties [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1353-1362. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||