Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences ›› 2023, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (5): 1170-1180.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.016
• Horticultural Special Local Products·Storage and Preservation Processing·Plant Protection • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHOU Weiquan1(), HOU Yixing1,2, LIU Chunyan1, Akejulidezi Nuergailide1, XUE Jing1, LI Shude3, ZHOU Long1()
Received:
2022-09-08
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-05-22
Correspondence author:
ZHOU Long(1976-), male, Turpan, Xinjiang, Ph. D, professor, research area: fruit germplasm resources and cultivation physiology, (E-mail)Supported by:
周伟权1(), 侯毅兴1,2, 刘春燕1, 阿克居里德孜·努尔改里得1, 薛靖1, 李树德3, 周龙1()
通讯作者:
周龙(1976-),男,新疆吐鲁番人,教授,博士生导师,研究方向为果树种质资源与栽培生理,(E-mail)作者简介:
周伟权(1992-),男,甘肃武威人,博士,研究方向为果树种质资源与栽培生理,(E-mail) zhouwq1120@163.com
基金资助:
CLC Number:
ZHOU Weiquan, HOU Yixing, LIU Chunyan, Akejulidezi Nuergailide, XUE Jing, LI Shude, ZHOU Long. Effects of hard branch grafting on root growth characteristics and anatomical structure of different grape rootstock and scion combinations[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1170-1180.
周伟权, 侯毅兴, 刘春燕, 阿克居里德孜·努尔改里得, 薛靖, 李树德, 周龙. 不同葡萄砧穗组合嫁接对根系生长特性及解剖结构的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2023, 60(5): 1170-1180.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.xjnykx.com/EN/10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2023.05.016
不同土层 深度 Different soil depth | 指标 indicators | 砧穗组合Rootstock-scion combination | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
户太8号/5BB Hutai 8/ 5BB | 户太8号/1103P Hutai 8/ 1103P | 户太8号/ 山河1号 Hutai 8/ Shanhe 1 | 苏欣1号/5BB Suxin 1/5BB | 苏欣1号/ 1103P Suxin 1/ 1103P | 苏欣1号/ 山河1号 Suxin 1/ Shanhe 1 | 红地球/5BB Red globe/5BB | 红地球/1103P Red globe/1103P | 红地球/ 山河1号 Red globe/ Shanhe 1 | ||
0~5 cm | 根系数量(条) | 2.33±0.33abc | 1.67±0.33bc | 3.33±0.33a | 3.00±0.00ab | 2.33±0.33abc | 3.67±0.67a | 2.33±0.67abc | 1.33±0.33c | 3.33±0.33a |
最大根长(cm) | 2.03±0.47d | 1.82±0.19d | 3.31±0.07b | 3.18±0.46bc | 3.17±0.24bc | 3.57±0.67ab | 2.64±0.10abc | 2.18±0.07cd | 4.46±0.14a | |
最大根粗(mm) | 0.47±0.11cde | 0.34±0.03de | 0.99±0.16ab | 0.86±0.06abc | 0.73±0.09abcd | 1.00±0.09ab | 0.67±0.04bcd | 0.25±0.02e | 1.14±0.30a | |
5~10 cm | 根系数量(条) | 4.00±0.58ab | 3.67±0.33ab | 4.67±0.58a | 4.67±0.88a | 4.33±0.58ab | 5.00±0.00a | 4.00±0.58ab | 2.67±0.88b | 4.67±0.33a |
最大根长(cm) | 3.41±0.60bc | 3.15±0.43c | 3.90±0.16abc | 3.76±0.29abc | 3.77±0.16abc | 4.38±0.15ab | 3.46±0.08bc | 2.97±0.44c | 4.77±0.27a | |
最大根粗(mm) | 0.79±0.07b | 0.75±0.02b | 1.12±0.23b | 1.12±0.08b | 1.09±0.20b | 1.92±0.34a | 0.95±0.08b | 0.73±0.06b | 1.19±0.16b | |
10~15 cm | 根系数量(条) | 7.67±1.20ab | 5.67±0.33b | 8.00±0.00ab | 8.00±0.58ab | 7.67±0.88ab | 9.33±1.20a | 7.67±0.88ab | 6.00±1.00b | 9.33±0.33a |
最大根长(cm) | 4.01±0.25bc | 3.87±0.32c | 4.88±0.50bc | 4.62±0.59bc | 4.59±0.08bc | 6.28±0.16a | 4.55±0.46bc | 3.83±0.28c | 5.14±0.17b | |
最大根粗(mm) | 1.44±0.23ab | 1.34±0.25ab | 1.66±0.14a | 1.62±0.13ab | 1.57±0.33ab | 1.77±0.07a | 1.57±0.24ab | 0.95±0.21b | 1.67±0.10a |
Tab.1 Comparison of root growth of grafted seedings with different stock-scion combinations
不同土层 深度 Different soil depth | 指标 indicators | 砧穗组合Rootstock-scion combination | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
户太8号/5BB Hutai 8/ 5BB | 户太8号/1103P Hutai 8/ 1103P | 户太8号/ 山河1号 Hutai 8/ Shanhe 1 | 苏欣1号/5BB Suxin 1/5BB | 苏欣1号/ 1103P Suxin 1/ 1103P | 苏欣1号/ 山河1号 Suxin 1/ Shanhe 1 | 红地球/5BB Red globe/5BB | 红地球/1103P Red globe/1103P | 红地球/ 山河1号 Red globe/ Shanhe 1 | ||
0~5 cm | 根系数量(条) | 2.33±0.33abc | 1.67±0.33bc | 3.33±0.33a | 3.00±0.00ab | 2.33±0.33abc | 3.67±0.67a | 2.33±0.67abc | 1.33±0.33c | 3.33±0.33a |
最大根长(cm) | 2.03±0.47d | 1.82±0.19d | 3.31±0.07b | 3.18±0.46bc | 3.17±0.24bc | 3.57±0.67ab | 2.64±0.10abc | 2.18±0.07cd | 4.46±0.14a | |
最大根粗(mm) | 0.47±0.11cde | 0.34±0.03de | 0.99±0.16ab | 0.86±0.06abc | 0.73±0.09abcd | 1.00±0.09ab | 0.67±0.04bcd | 0.25±0.02e | 1.14±0.30a | |
5~10 cm | 根系数量(条) | 4.00±0.58ab | 3.67±0.33ab | 4.67±0.58a | 4.67±0.88a | 4.33±0.58ab | 5.00±0.00a | 4.00±0.58ab | 2.67±0.88b | 4.67±0.33a |
最大根长(cm) | 3.41±0.60bc | 3.15±0.43c | 3.90±0.16abc | 3.76±0.29abc | 3.77±0.16abc | 4.38±0.15ab | 3.46±0.08bc | 2.97±0.44c | 4.77±0.27a | |
最大根粗(mm) | 0.79±0.07b | 0.75±0.02b | 1.12±0.23b | 1.12±0.08b | 1.09±0.20b | 1.92±0.34a | 0.95±0.08b | 0.73±0.06b | 1.19±0.16b | |
10~15 cm | 根系数量(条) | 7.67±1.20ab | 5.67±0.33b | 8.00±0.00ab | 8.00±0.58ab | 7.67±0.88ab | 9.33±1.20a | 7.67±0.88ab | 6.00±1.00b | 9.33±0.33a |
最大根长(cm) | 4.01±0.25bc | 3.87±0.32c | 4.88±0.50bc | 4.62±0.59bc | 4.59±0.08bc | 6.28±0.16a | 4.55±0.46bc | 3.83±0.28c | 5.14±0.17b | |
最大根粗(mm) | 1.44±0.23ab | 1.34±0.25ab | 1.66±0.14a | 1.62±0.13ab | 1.57±0.33ab | 1.77±0.07a | 1.57±0.24ab | 0.95±0.21b | 1.67±0.10a |
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 相对电导率 Relative conductivity (%) | 根系活力 Roots activity [μg/(mL·g·h)] | 可溶性 蛋白含量 Soluble protein content (μg/g) | 可溶性 糖含量 Soluble sugar content (μg/g) | SOD活性 SOD avtivity (μg/g) | POD活性 POD activity (U/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
户太8号/5BB Hutai 8/5BB | 23.14±0.81ab | 11.29±1.81cd | 5.20±0.33de | 5.79±0.29de | 177.87±8.44a | 3 103.33±345.71abc |
户太8号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 24.97±0.50ab | 10.90±3.70cd | 4.43±0.30ef | 4.56±0.16ef | 169.39±10.32a | 3 364.67±397.41ab |
户太8号/山河1号 Hutai 8/Shanhe 1 | 22.74±2.74ab | 25.64±1.20ab | 7.34±0.39b | 8.21±0.42b | 196.00±29.82a | 2 417.33±457.33bcd |
苏欣1号/5BB Suxin 1/5BB | 27.19±1.45a | 23.45±1.67ab | 7.46±0.29b | 7.71±0.36bc | 190.86±16.35a | 2 580.67±142.39abcd |
苏欣1号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 26.29±1.15ab | 18.91±1.19bc | 6.51±0.08c | 6.57±0.38cd | 174.54±21.43a | 2 678.67±321.73abcd |
苏欣1号/山河1号 Suxin 1/Shanhe 1 | 22.08±0.46b | 31.10±1.13a | 9.50±0.16a | 10.95±0.43a | 205.15±27.89a | 2 025.33±376.73d |
红地球/5BB Red globe/5BB | 26.87±0.77a | 13.46±1.67cd | 5.76±0.29cd | 6.11±0.78d | 184.73±12.84a | 3 005.33±65.33abcd |
红地球/1103P Red globe/1103P | 23.26±1.78ab | 8.97±3.70d | 3.89±0.23f | 3.86±0.33f | 156.60±11.74a | 3 495.33±142.39a |
红地球/山河1号 Red globe/Shanhe 1 | 21.80±0.87b | 28.78±4.04a | 9.10±0.27a | 9.78±0.64a | 199.49±29.21a | 2 221.33±86.43cd |
Tab.2 Comparison of physiological and biochemical indexes of grafted seedings with different stock-scion combinations
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 相对电导率 Relative conductivity (%) | 根系活力 Roots activity [μg/(mL·g·h)] | 可溶性 蛋白含量 Soluble protein content (μg/g) | 可溶性 糖含量 Soluble sugar content (μg/g) | SOD活性 SOD avtivity (μg/g) | POD活性 POD activity (U/g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
户太8号/5BB Hutai 8/5BB | 23.14±0.81ab | 11.29±1.81cd | 5.20±0.33de | 5.79±0.29de | 177.87±8.44a | 3 103.33±345.71abc |
户太8号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 24.97±0.50ab | 10.90±3.70cd | 4.43±0.30ef | 4.56±0.16ef | 169.39±10.32a | 3 364.67±397.41ab |
户太8号/山河1号 Hutai 8/Shanhe 1 | 22.74±2.74ab | 25.64±1.20ab | 7.34±0.39b | 8.21±0.42b | 196.00±29.82a | 2 417.33±457.33bcd |
苏欣1号/5BB Suxin 1/5BB | 27.19±1.45a | 23.45±1.67ab | 7.46±0.29b | 7.71±0.36bc | 190.86±16.35a | 2 580.67±142.39abcd |
苏欣1号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 26.29±1.15ab | 18.91±1.19bc | 6.51±0.08c | 6.57±0.38cd | 174.54±21.43a | 2 678.67±321.73abcd |
苏欣1号/山河1号 Suxin 1/Shanhe 1 | 22.08±0.46b | 31.10±1.13a | 9.50±0.16a | 10.95±0.43a | 205.15±27.89a | 2 025.33±376.73d |
红地球/5BB Red globe/5BB | 26.87±0.77a | 13.46±1.67cd | 5.76±0.29cd | 6.11±0.78d | 184.73±12.84a | 3 005.33±65.33abcd |
红地球/1103P Red globe/1103P | 23.26±1.78ab | 8.97±3.70d | 3.89±0.23f | 3.86±0.33f | 156.60±11.74a | 3 495.33±142.39a |
红地球/山河1号 Red globe/Shanhe 1 | 21.80±0.87b | 28.78±4.04a | 9.10±0.27a | 9.78±0.64a | 199.49±29.21a | 2 221.33±86.43cd |
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 导管直径 Vessel diameter (μm) | 导管面积 Vessel area (mm2) | 导管密度 Vessel density (个/mm2) | 木质部面积 Xylem area (mm2) | 中柱面积 Stele area (mm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5BB | 0.591±0.081a | 0.027±0.002a | 5 335±115.604b | 0.007±0.000c | 0.037±0.003c |
红地球/5BB Red globe/5BB | 1.017±0.086a | 0.035±0.001a | 6 592±166.515a | 0.010±0.000b | 0.134±0.001a |
户太8号/5BB Hutai 8/5BB | 1.068±0.287a | 0.036±0.005a | 6 025±364.008ab | 0.013±0.001a | 0.113±0.007b |
苏欣1号/5BB Suxin 1/5BB | 0.936±0.102a | 0.036±0.010a | 6 063±101.950ab | 0.013±0.000a | 0.106±0.005b |
山河1号 Shanhe 1 | 0.953±0.103a | 0.034±0.002a | 5 948±389.425b | 0.010±0.001b | 0.157±0.004c |
红地球/山河1号 Red globe/Shanhe 1 | 0.573±0.036c | 0.026±0.001c | 5 687±351.691b | 0.011±0.001b | 0.203±0.003b |
户太8号/山河1号 Hutai 8/Shanhe 1 | 0.646±0.086bc | 0.028±0.002bc | 4 508±245.094c | 0.010±0.000b | 0.088±0.007d |
苏欣1号/山河1号 Suxin 1/Shanhe 1 | 0.865±0.087ab | 0.033±0.002ab | 7 597±232.305a | 0.014±0.000a | 0.311±0.006 a |
1103P | 0.958±0.102b | 0.034±0.002b | 6 702±182.392a | 0.009±0.001b | 0.126±0.005b |
红地球/1103P Red globe/1103P | 1.30±0.022a | 0.040±0.000a | 6 429±298.960a | 0.012±0.000a | 0.181±0.006a |
户太8号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 0.757±0.128b | 0.030±0.003b | 5 414±258.057b | 0.009±0.001b | 0.075±0.001c |
苏欣1号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 0.149±0.014c | 0.012±0.001c | 5 325±123.163b | 0.003±0.000c | 0.085±0.003c |
Tab.3 Comparison of anatomical parameters of root system of three rootstocks and different combinations of rootstocks and scions
砧穗组合 Rootstock-scion combination | 导管直径 Vessel diameter (μm) | 导管面积 Vessel area (mm2) | 导管密度 Vessel density (个/mm2) | 木质部面积 Xylem area (mm2) | 中柱面积 Stele area (mm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5BB | 0.591±0.081a | 0.027±0.002a | 5 335±115.604b | 0.007±0.000c | 0.037±0.003c |
红地球/5BB Red globe/5BB | 1.017±0.086a | 0.035±0.001a | 6 592±166.515a | 0.010±0.000b | 0.134±0.001a |
户太8号/5BB Hutai 8/5BB | 1.068±0.287a | 0.036±0.005a | 6 025±364.008ab | 0.013±0.001a | 0.113±0.007b |
苏欣1号/5BB Suxin 1/5BB | 0.936±0.102a | 0.036±0.010a | 6 063±101.950ab | 0.013±0.000a | 0.106±0.005b |
山河1号 Shanhe 1 | 0.953±0.103a | 0.034±0.002a | 5 948±389.425b | 0.010±0.001b | 0.157±0.004c |
红地球/山河1号 Red globe/Shanhe 1 | 0.573±0.036c | 0.026±0.001c | 5 687±351.691b | 0.011±0.001b | 0.203±0.003b |
户太8号/山河1号 Hutai 8/Shanhe 1 | 0.646±0.086bc | 0.028±0.002bc | 4 508±245.094c | 0.010±0.000b | 0.088±0.007d |
苏欣1号/山河1号 Suxin 1/Shanhe 1 | 0.865±0.087ab | 0.033±0.002ab | 7 597±232.305a | 0.014±0.000a | 0.311±0.006 a |
1103P | 0.958±0.102b | 0.034±0.002b | 6 702±182.392a | 0.009±0.001b | 0.126±0.005b |
红地球/1103P Red globe/1103P | 1.30±0.022a | 0.040±0.000a | 6 429±298.960a | 0.012±0.000a | 0.181±0.006a |
户太8号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 0.757±0.128b | 0.030±0.003b | 5 414±258.057b | 0.009±0.001b | 0.075±0.001c |
苏欣1号/1103P Hutai 8/1103P | 0.149±0.014c | 0.012±0.001c | 5 325±123.163b | 0.003±0.000c | 0.085±0.003c |
相关指标 Relevant indicators | 根系数量 Number of roots | 最大根长 Maximum root length | 最大根粗 Maximum root crude | 相对 电导率 Relative condu ctivity | 根系活力 Roots activity | 可溶性 蛋白 Soluble protein | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | SOD活性 Activity of SOD | POD活性 Activity of POD | 成活率 Survival rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系数量 Number of roots | 1.000 | |||||||||
最大根长 Maximum root length | 0.925** | 1.000 | ||||||||
最大根粗 Maximum root crude | 0.965** | 0.943** | 1.000 | |||||||
相对电导率 Relative conductivity | -0.279 | -0.374 | -0.229 | 1.000 | ||||||
根系活力 Roots activity | 0.925** | 0.961** | 0.953** | -0.349 | 1.000 | |||||
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 0.964** | 0.982** | 0.973** | -0.325 | 0.979** | 1.000 | ||||
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.968** | 0.968** | 0.976** | -0.398 | 0.970** | 0.991** | 1.000 | |||
SOD活性 Activity of SOD | 0.964** | 0.884** | 0.949** | -0.287 | 0.908** | 0.934** | 0.952** | 1.000 | ||
POD活性 Activity of POD | -0.970** | -0.969** | -0.982** | 0.316 | -0.982** | -0.988** | -0.983** | -0.929** | 1.000 | |
成活率 Survival rate | 0.917** | 0.920** | 0.943** | -0.296 | 0.983** | 0.966** | 0.961** | 0.923** | -0.957** | 1.000 |
Tab.4 Correlation analysis of grafting survival rate, root growth, physiological and biochemical indexes of different stock-scion combinations
相关指标 Relevant indicators | 根系数量 Number of roots | 最大根长 Maximum root length | 最大根粗 Maximum root crude | 相对 电导率 Relative condu ctivity | 根系活力 Roots activity | 可溶性 蛋白 Soluble protein | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | SOD活性 Activity of SOD | POD活性 Activity of POD | 成活率 Survival rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根系数量 Number of roots | 1.000 | |||||||||
最大根长 Maximum root length | 0.925** | 1.000 | ||||||||
最大根粗 Maximum root crude | 0.965** | 0.943** | 1.000 | |||||||
相对电导率 Relative conductivity | -0.279 | -0.374 | -0.229 | 1.000 | ||||||
根系活力 Roots activity | 0.925** | 0.961** | 0.953** | -0.349 | 1.000 | |||||
可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | 0.964** | 0.982** | 0.973** | -0.325 | 0.979** | 1.000 | ||||
可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 0.968** | 0.968** | 0.976** | -0.398 | 0.970** | 0.991** | 1.000 | |||
SOD活性 Activity of SOD | 0.964** | 0.884** | 0.949** | -0.287 | 0.908** | 0.934** | 0.952** | 1.000 | ||
POD活性 Activity of POD | -0.970** | -0.969** | -0.982** | 0.316 | -0.982** | -0.988** | -0.983** | -0.929** | 1.000 | |
成活率 Survival rate | 0.917** | 0.920** | 0.943** | -0.296 | 0.983** | 0.966** | 0.961** | 0.923** | -0.957** | 1.000 |
[1] | 贺普超. 葡萄学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999. |
HE Chaopu. Enology[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1999. | |
[2] | 新疆维吾尔自治区统计局. 新疆统计年鉴[J]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021. |
Statistics Bureau of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Xinjiang Statistical Yearbook[J]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021. | |
[3] | Reinhard, Topfer, Ludger, et al. New Horizons for Grapevine Breeding[J]. Fruit, Vegetable and Cereal Science and Biotechnology, 2011, 5(1): 79-100. |
[4] | Ken M, Jules J, Steven S, et al. A history of grafting[J]. Horticultural Reviews, 2009: 437-493. |
[5] |
付晴晴, 孙鲁龙, 翟衡, 等. 葡萄种间杂交砧木育种F1代植株耐盐性分析[J]. 植物学报, 2017, 52(6): 733-743.
DOI |
FU Qingqing, SUN Lulong, ZHAI Heng, et al. Salt Tolerant Evaluation of F1-generation Hybrids in Grape[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2017, 52(6): 733-743. | |
[6] | 钟海霞, 潘明启, 张付春, 等. 7种砧木对克瑞森无核葡萄生长及产量品质的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2016, 53(10): 1786-1793. |
ZHONG Haixia, PAN Mingqi, ZHANG Fuchun, et al. Effects of Seven Rootstocks on Growth,Yield and Quality of Crimson Seedless Grapes[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 53(10): 1786-1793. | |
[7] |
牛锐敏, 黄小晶, 沈甜, 等. 砧木对霞多丽和美乐葡萄生长、果实产量和品质的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(1): 116-123.
DOI |
NIU Ruimin, HUANG Xiaojing, SHEN Tian, et al. Effects of Different Rootstock on the Growth,Yield and Fruit Quality of Chardonnay and Merlot Grapes[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(1): 116-123. | |
[8] | Zhang F C, Zhong H X, Zhou X M, et al. Grafting with rootstocks promotes phenolic compound accumulation in grape berry skin during development based on integrative multi-omics analysis[J]. Horticulture Research, 2022, 9. |
[9] |
Cookson S J, Ollat N. Grafting with rootstocks induces extensive transcriptional re-programming in the shoot apical meristem of grapevine[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2013, 13(1): 1-14.
DOI URL |
[10] | 陶建敏, 李小红, 蒋爱丽, 等. 不同葡萄砧木对矢富罗莎嫁接苗根系形态变化的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2007,(2): 82-84. |
TAO Jianmin, LI Xiaohong, JIANG Aili, et al. Effects of different grape rootstocks on the morphological changes of root system of grafted seedlings of ‘Shifuluosha’[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2007,(2): 82-84. | |
[11] | 王家民, 王学山, 郭兆林. 葡萄接穗对砧木根系生理活性的影响[J]. 宁夏科技, 2002,(1): 45. |
WANG Jiaming, WANG Xueshan, GUO Zhaolin, et al. Effect of grape scion on root physiological activity of rootstock[J]. Ningxia Science and Technology, 2002,(1): 45. | |
[12] | 黄曼娜, 孙华丽, 宋健坤, 等. 杏叶梨/杜梨嫁接愈合过程的解剖学与生理学研究[J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 31(3): 177-182. |
HUANG Manna, SUN Huali, SONG Jiankun, et al. Study on Anatomy and Physiology of Graft Healing Process in ‘P.armeniaeaefolia/P.betulaefolia’[J]. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University (Natural Science Ed.), 2014, 31(3): 177-182. | |
[13] | 汤丹. 不同中间砧嫁接‘富有’甜柿的亲和性研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2016. |
TANG Dan. The Affinity of Diospyros kaki Thunb ‘Fuyu’ Grafted onto Different Inter-stocks[D]. Beijing: China Academy of Forestry Sciences, 2016. | |
[14] | 兖攀, 彭方仁, 张瑞, 等. 美国山核桃嫁接愈合过程的组织细胞学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2): 202-206. |
YAN Pan, PENG Fangren, ZHANG Rui, et al. Histo-cytological observation on the graft union formation in Carya illinoinensis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Ed.) 2018, 42(2): 202-206. | |
[15] | 高展, 尤佳辉, 高林, 等. ‘贝达’砧木与9个酿酒葡萄接穗枝条解剖结构观察[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2020,(3): 20-23. |
GAO Zhan, YOU Jiahui, GAO Lin, et al. Anatomical structure studies on branches of ‘Beta’ rootstock and nine wine grape scions[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2020,(3): 20-23. | |
[16] |
何文, 潘鹤立, 潘腾飞, 等. 果树砧穗互作研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(9): 1645-1657.
DOI |
HE Wen, PAN Heli, PAN Tengfei, et al. Research Progress on the Interaction Between Scion and Rootstock in Fruit Trees[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(9): 1645-1657.
DOI |
|
[17] |
Melnyk C W, Schuster C, Leyser O, et al. A developmental framework for graft formation and vascular reconnection in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. Current Biology, 2015, 25(10): 1306-1318.
DOI URL |
[18] | 张蜀秋. 植物生理学实验技术教程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011. |
ZHANG Shuqiu. A course on experimental techniques of Plant Physiology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011. | |
[19] | 严毅, 李贤忠, 张南新, 等. 葡萄柚不同砧穗组合的嫁接亲和性[J]. 经济林研究, 2012, 30(1): 103-107. |
YAN Yi, LI Xianzhong, ZHANG Nanxin, et al. Grafting affifinity of different rootstock and scion combinations in grapefruit[J]. Non-wood Forest Research, 2012, 30(1): 103-107. | |
[20] |
李桦, 梁春强, 吕茳, 等. 草酸对冷藏“华优”猕猴桃果实木质化及相关酶活性的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(6): 1085-1093.
DOI |
LI Hua, LIANG Chunqiang, LV Jiang, et al. Effects of Oxalic Acid Treatment on Lignification and Related Enzymes Activities in ‘Huayou’ Kiwifruit During Cold Storage[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(6): 1085-1093.
DOI |
|
[21] | 马绍英, 刘元卫, 苏李维, 等. 葡萄离体嫁接部位的生理生化变化[J]. 果树学报, 2016, 33(2): 179-186. |
MA Shaoying, LIU Yuanwei, SU Liwei, et al. Physiological and biochemical changes in the graft site after in vitro grafting in grape[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2016, 33(2): 179-186. | |
[22] | Edelstein M, Burger Y, Horev C, et al. Assessing the effect of genetic and anatomical variation of Cucurbita rootstocks on vigour,survival and yield of grafted melons[J]. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2004, 79(3): 370-374. |
[23] | 侯毅兴, 阿克居里德孜·努尔改里得, 薛靖, 等. 鲜食葡萄砧穗组合生理指标及亲和力分析[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2022,(2): 33-37. |
HOU Yixing, Nuergailide Akejulidezi, XUE Jing, et al. Physiological indexes and affinity analysis of table grapes stock-scion combinations[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2022,(2): 33-37. | |
[24] | 李娜, 朱培林, 丰采, 等. 青钱柳嫁接愈合过程中砧穗生理特性及其与亲和性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1): 13-20. |
LI Na, ZHU Peilin, FENG Cai, et al. Variations in physiological characteristics of rootstock-scion and its relationship to graft compatibility during the grafting union process of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Ed.), 2021, 45(1): 13-20. | |
[25] | 王忠. 植物生理学(第二版)[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010. |
WANG Zhong. Plant Physiology (Second Ed.)[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2010. | |
[26] | 王少华, 邵文胜, 孙静, 等. 葡萄砧穗组合嫁接亲和性研究[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(4): 80-82,87. |
WANG Shaohua, SHAO Wensheng, SUN Jing, et al. Study on grafting compatibility of grape rootstock and scion combinations[J]. South China Fruits, 2015, 44(4): 80-82,87. | |
[27] |
Koepke T, Dhingra A. Rootstock scion somatogenetic interactions in perennial composite plants[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2013, 32(9): 1321-1337.
DOI PMID |
[28] | 王淑杰, 王家民, 王连君, 等. 葡萄接穗对砧木生理特性的影响[J]. 中外葡萄与葡萄酒, 2001,(4): 30-31. |
WANG Shujie, WANG Jiamin, WANG Lianjun, et al. Effect of grape scion on physiological characteristics of rootstock[J]. Sino-Overseas Grapevine & Wine, 2001,(4): 30-31. | |
[29] | 王燕, 王韶仲, 董雪云, 等. 胡桃楸和黄波椤根尖导水率及影响因子[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(9): 6-9, 22. |
WANG Yan, WANG Shaozhong, DONG Xueyun, et al. Hydraulic Conductivity of Root Tips and Related Anatomical Traits in Juglans mandshurica and Phellodendron amurense[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(9): 6-9, 22. | |
[30] | 郑芳奕, 杨志坚, 陈辉, 等. 接穗对油茶砧木根生理特性及解剖结构的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2020, 40(6): 636-642. |
ZHENG Fangyi, YANG Zhijian, CHEN Hui, Effects of scions on the physiological characteristics and anatomical structure of the root tip of Camellia oleifera rootstock[J]. Journal of Forest and Environment, 2020, 40(6): 636-642. | |
[31] | 曹建华, 林位夫, 陈俊明. 砧木与接穗嫁接亲合力研究综述[J]. 热带农业科学, 2005, 25(4): 68-73. |
CAO Jianhua, LIN Weifu, CHEN Junming. A review on the study of grafting affinity between rootstock and scion[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 25(4): 68-73. | |
[32] | 袁军伟, 李敏敏, 刘长江, 等. 不同砧木与红地球葡萄硬枝嫁接亲和力评价及遗传背景分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(7): 104-109. |
YUAN Junwei, LI Minmin, LIU Changjie, et al. Evaluation of Grafting Affinity and Genetic Background Analysis of Different Rootstocks and Hard Branches of Red Globe Grape[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(7): 104-109. |
[1] | ZHANG Liguo, GUO Chungui, CHANG Lichun, GUO Xinlei, ZHANG Tao, WU Jian, LIANG Jianli, GAO Jie, WANG Xiaowu. Development of molecular markers for clubroot resistance and identification of germplasm resources for Brassica rapa [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(9): 2281-2290. |
[2] | HAN Shouan, WANG Min, Maihemuti Turupu, XIE Hui, Aiermaike Caikasimu, LIU Jiale, ZHANG Wen, PAN Mingqi. Effects of different light quality treatments on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and fruit quality of Cabernet Sauvignon grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1894-1903. |
[3] | ZHU Xuehui, ZHANG Wen, MA Yunlong, HE Pengfei, HAN Shouan, WANG Min, TIAN Jia, XIE Hui. Effects of high temperature stress on photosynthetic characteristics of grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1913-1921. |
[4] | WANG Man, ZHANG Zheng, Yilidana Dilixiati, WU Bin. Cloning and bioinformatics analysis of VvGST1 from Munage tab.grapes [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1922-1930. |
[5] | ZHANG Chao, BAI Yungang, ZHENG Ming, XIAO Jun, DING Ping. Synergistic effect of water and fertilizer on grape in extreme arid area [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(8): 1931-1939. |
[6] | LUO Siwei, JIA Yonghong, ZHANG Jinshan, WANG Kai, LI Dandan, WANG Runqi, DONG Yanxue, SHI Shubing. Effects of drip irrigation capillary spacing and emitter spacing on the spatial distribution of soil water, root morphology and yield of uniformly sown winter wheat [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1344-1352. |
[7] | WEI Wei, SHAN Shouming, XU Wendi, LI Guangzong. Transcriptome analysis of callus at rooting stage in tissue culture of vitis amurensis 'shuangyou' [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1451-1459. |
[8] | HU Jinge, BAI Shijian, CHEN Guang, CAI Junshe. Effects of different rootstocks on the composition and content of anthocyanin in Marselan wine grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1466-1475. |
[9] | ZHANG Guoxin, SONG Danbo, LIU Baojun, WANG Quan, BAI Jianyu, GUO Qingyuan. Biological characteristics and screening of fungicides of Xanthoceras sorbifolium bunge root rot in the lab [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(6): 1523-1530. |
[10] | ZHU Baoguo, KUANG Enjun, TENG Zhanglin, MENG Qingying, WANG Nannan, FENG Haoyuan, QIU Lei, GAO Xuedong, ZHANG Chunfeng. Effects of different bio-organic fertilizers application combined with conventional fertilization on growth, disease resistance and yield of soybean [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1127-1133. |
[11] | CHANG Xuehua, YAN Bowen, ZHAI Rongzhen, ZHANG Zheng, WU Bin, WEI Jia. Effects of sulfur dioxide on sugar content and sugar metabolism pathway in Munage grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(5): 1216-1225. |
[12] | GAO Fan, MA Zhongjie, XU Guishan, WANG Yan, PENG Wanwan, FENG Xinwei, YUAN Guohong. Effects of different proportion of grape seeds in diet on intestinal bacterial flora structure of Duolang sheep [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 1020-1027. |
[13] | ZHANG Chen, LIANG Yue, YIN Hao, ZHANG Yingrong, CHEN Bolang. Effects of nitrogen forms and varieties on root morphology and nitrogen accumulation of cotton [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 823-831. |
[14] | WANG Yong, Sulaiman Aizezi, LI Yuling, SUN Feng, WU Guohong, YANG Tao, GUO Pingfeng. Genetic analysis of nuclear characters of hybrids of ruby seedless and hongqitezao grape [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 872-879. |
[15] | CHEN Liliang, LU Qianjun, MA Yuanyuan, LIU Ying, ZHAO Baolong, SUN Junli. Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant enzyme content and malondialdehyde content in grape cultivars leaves [J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 60(4): 880-888. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||